The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Tuesday, September 30, 2025
Saturday, September 27, 2025
Jews and Germany
„Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the aged! Kill every German -- wipe them out!“ (Llya Ehrenburg, Glaser, p. 111).
„The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end.“ (The Jewish newspaper, Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939)
„Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child.“ (Jewish professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937)
„Our fight against Germany must be carried to the limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us, therefore, defend Israel! Against the awakened Germany, we put an awakened Israel. And the world will defend us.“ (Jewish author Pierre Creange in his book Epitres aux Juifs, 1938)
„Judea declares War on Germany.“ (Daily Express, March 24, 1934)
„Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30-year War.“ (Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Dairy, p. 11).
„The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany...“ (Valadimir Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934)
„In fact, about 600 news-papers were officially banned during 1933. Others were unofficially silenced by street methods. The exceptions included Judische Rundschau, the ZVfD’s Weekly and several other Jewish publications. German Zionism’s weekly was hawked on street corners and displayed at news stands. When Chaim Arlosoroff visited Zionist headquarters in London on June 1, he emphasized, ‘The Rundschau is of crucial Rundschau circulation had in fact jumped to more than 38,000 -- four to five times its 1932 circulation. Although many influential Aryan publications were forced to restrict their page size to conserve newsprint, Judische Rundschau was not affected until mandatory newsprint rationing in 1937.
And while stringent censorship of all German publications was enforced from the outset, Judische Rundschau was allowed relative press freedoms. Although two issues of it were suppressed when they published Chaim Arlosoroff’s outline for a capital transfer, such seizures were rare. Other than the ban on anti-Nazi boycott references, printing atrocity stories, and criticizing the Reich, Judische Rundschau was essentially exempt from the so-called Gleichschaltung or ‘uniformity’ demanded by the Nazi Party of all facets of German society. Juedische Rundschau was free to preach Zionism as a wholly separate political philosophy -- indeed, the only separate political philosophy sanction by the Third Reich.“ (This shows the Jewish Zionists enjoyed a visibly protected political status in Germany, prior to World War II).
„...In Germany the Jews occupy the principal rìles and are first-rate revolutionaries. They are writers, philosophers, poets, orators, publicists, and bankers, and on their heads and in their hearts all the weight of ancient ignominy! They will one day be terrible for Germany...probably followed by a morrow terrible for them.“ (Rougeyron, 1861; Metternich, 1849; The Trail of the Serpent, Inquire Within, Miss Stoddard, p. 93).
„That German Jewry could raise the Star of David -- Emblazoned Zionist Flag...“ (Nuremburg Laws of 1935)
„I know in expressing with this frankness my ultimate opinion of the Jews, I expose myself to enormous danger. Many people share it, but very few dare to express it publicly, for the Jewish sect... constitutes today a veritable power in Europe. It reigns despotically in commerce, in the banks, and it has invaded three-quarters of German journalism, and a very considerable portion of the journalism of other countries. Woe, then, to him who has the clumsiness to displease it!“ (Study of the German Jews, (1869).
„In no place so much as in Germany do the Jews [in finance, industries and commerce] hold such an important, almost preponderant part. Therefore it might easily be said that all the newly-rich and war- profiteer, is an ancient of a thousand years...The immense majority of the influentials in Austrian Socialism were and are still Jews (1921) ...finally, in a certain sense the Jews oppose themselves to non-Jews, above all in the rìle they play as initiators and actors in the extreme-left parties as internationalism opposed to nationalism.“ (Le Probläme Juic, (1921), Georges Batault).
„The German revolution is the achievement of the Jews; the Liberal Democratic parties have a great number of Jews as their leaders, and the Jews play a predominant role in the high government offices.“ (The Jewish Tribune, July 5, 1920)
„I hope every German west of the Rhine River and wherever we attack, will be destroyed.“ (R.F. Keeling). (Rabbi Rabinovich’s Speech of January 12th, 1952)
„The story I shall unfold in these pages is the story of Germany’s two faces, the one turned towards Western Europe, the other turned towards Soviet Russia...It can be said, without any exaggeration, that from 1921 till the present day Russia has been able, thanks to Germany, to equip herself with all kinds of arms, munitions, and the most up-to-date war material for an army of several millions; and that, thanks to her factories manufacturing war material in Russia, Germany has been able to assure herself not only of secret supplies of war material and the training of officers and other ranks in the use of this material, but also, in the event of war, the possession of the best stocked arsenals in Russia...The firm of Krupp’s of Essen, Krupp the German Cannon-King (Kanonenkoenig), deserves a chapter to itself in this review of German war-industries in Russia.
It deserves a separate chapter...because its activity upon Soviet territory has grown to tremendous proportions...The final consolidation of the dominating position Krupp’s occupy in Russia, was the formation of a separate company ‘Manych’ to which the Soviet Government granted a liberal concession...Negotiations concerning these concessions for the company were conducted in Moscow, for several months...Gradually there was formed in Russia a chain of experimental training camps, and artillery parks (ostensibly eliminated by the Treaty of Versailles).
These are under the management of German officers, and they are invariably teeming with Germans either arriving to undergo a course of training, or leaving after the completion of the course...At the time of writing (1932) interest is growing in the rising star of Herr Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Leader. Herr Hitler is regarded as the protagonist par excellence of the Right against the Left in Germany, and, as a Hitlerist regime is anticipated before long, it may perhaps be argued that the Third Reich of the Nazis, the sworn enemies of Communism, would not tolerate the Reichswehr-Red Army connection. Such a conclusion would be inaccurate to the last degree ...Stalin, the realist, would have no qualms in collaboration with the Hitlerist Germany. But more important than this are the following facts: The Reichswehr Chiefs and their political allies amongst the civilian politicians and officials have succeeded in nursing their Eastern orientation, their underground military collaboration with the Soviets, in spite of all the changes of political regime in Germany since the end of the war. It has made little or no difference to them whether the Reich Government has been composed of men of the Right, the Center, or the Left. They have just continued their policy uninfluenced by political change. There is no reason to suppose that they would change their course under a Hitlerist regime, especially when it is remembered that most of the aims, in external policy, of the Nazi leaders, are identical with those of the Nationalists and the military leaders themselves. Furthermore, there are the great German industrialists, of Nationals color, who are amongst the principal collaborators, on the war material side, with the Reichswehr Chiefs, and who are, therefore, hand in glove with the directors of the ‘Abmachungen’ (Agreements) plot. Many of these great industrialists are contributors on a big scale to the Nazi party funds. A hitlerist Germany would, therefore, have no qualms in continuing the collaboration with Soviet Russia...The Reichswehr chiefs who are conducting the Abmachungen delude themselves that they can use Bolshevist Russia to help them in their hoped-for war of revenge against Europe, and then, in the hour of victory, hold the Bolshevists at bay, and keep them in their place. The more subtle psychologists at the Kremlin, of course, know better, but are wise enough to keep their knowledge to themselves. The fact, however, that this German-Russian plot will, in the end, bring about the destruction of Germany, will not in any way reconcile Europe to its own destruction at the hands of Germany and Russia together.“ (The Russian Face of Germany, Cecil F. Melville, pp. 4, 102, 114, 117, 120, 173-174, 176).
„In [pre-WW II] Berlin, for example, when the Nazis came to power, 50.2% of the lawyers were Jews...48% of the doctors were Jews. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and made great inroads on the educational system.“ (The House That Hitler Built, by Stephen Roberts, 1937).
„...Each of you, Jew and gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in the sacred war should do so now...“ (Samuel Undermeyer, Radio Broadcast, New York City, August 6, 1933)
„All Jews world wide -- declared war on the Third Reich.“ (The London Daily Express, Front Page Story, 3/24/1933).
„...Jabotinsky insisted that all energies be expended to force the Congress to join the boycott movement. Nothing less than a ‘merciless fight’ would be acceptable, cried Jabotinsky. ‘The present Congress is duty bound to put the Jewish problem in Germany before the entire world...(We [Jews] must) destroy, destroy, destroy them, not only with the boycott, but politically, supporting all existing forces against them to isolate Germany from the civilized world...our enemy [Germany] must be destroyed.“ (Speech by Vladimir Jabotinsky, a Polish Jews, on June 16, 1933)
„German Jewry, which found its temporary end during the Nazi period, was one of the most interesting and for modern Jewish history most influential centers of European Jewry. During the era of emancipation, i.e. in the second half of the nineteenth and in the early twentieth century, it had experienced a meteoric rise...It had fully participated in the rapid industrial rise of Imperial Germany, made a substantial contribution to it and acquired a renowned position in German economic life. Seen from the economic point of view, no Jewish minority in any other country, not even that in America could possibly compete with the German Jews. They were involved in large scale banking, a situation unparalled elsewhere, and, by way of high finance, they had also penetrated German industry.
A considerable portion of the wholesale trade was Jewish. They controlled even such branches of industry which is generally not in Jewish hands. Examples are shipping or the electrical industry, and names such as Ballin and Rathenau do confirm this statement.
I hardly know of any other branch of emancipated Jewry in Europe or the American continent that was as deeply rooted in the general economy as was German Jewry. American Jews of today are absolutely as well as relative richer than the German Jews were at the time, it is true, but even in America with its unlimited possibilities the Jews have not succeeded in penetrating into the central spheres of industry (steel, iron, heavy industry, shipping), as was the case in Germany.
Their position in the intellectual life of the country was equally unique. In literature, they were represented by illustrious names. The theater was largely in their hands. The daily press, above all its internationally influential sector, was essentially owned by Jews or controlled by them. As paradoxical as this may sound today, after the Hitler era, I have no hesitation to say that hardly any section of the Jewish people has made such extensive use of the emancipation offered to them in the nineteenth century as the German Jews! In short, the history of the Jews in Germany from 1870 to 1933 is probably the most glorious rise that has ever been achieved by any branch of the Jewish people.
The majority of the German Jews were never fully assimilated and were much more Jewish than the Jews in other West European countries.“ (Feuerzeichen, Ingid Weckert, Tubingen 1981, p. 52-54, with reference to Nation Europa 10/1962, pp. 116-120)
„We became aware of the propaganda in your country about alleged cruelties against the Jews in Germany. We therefore consider it our duty, not only in our own interest as German patriots, but also for the sake of truth, to comment on these incidents. Mistreatment and excesses have indeed occurred, and we are far from glossing these over. But this is hardly avoidable in any kind of revolution. We attach great significance to the fact that the authorities where it was at all possible to interfere, have done so against outrages that have come to our knowledge. In all cases, these deeds were committed by irresponsible elements who kept in hiding. We know that the government and all leading authorities most strongly disapprove of the violations that occurred.
But we also feel that now is the time to move away from the irresponsible agitation on the part of so-called Jewish intellectuals living abroad. These men, most of whom never considered themselves German nationals, but pretended to be champions for those of their own faith, abandoned them at a critical time and fled the country. They lost, therefore, the right to speak out on German-Jewish affairs. The accusations which they are hurling from their safe hiding places, are injurious to German and German Jews; their reports are vastly exaggerated. We ask the U.S. Embassy to forward this letter to the U.S. without delay, and we are accepting full responsibility for its content. Since we know that a large-scale propaganda campaign is to be launched next Monday, we would appreciate if the American public be informed of this letter by that date [Of course we know that the Jewish owned American News Media did not so inform the American Public -- just another of the traitorous actions which they have repeated time after time over the years]...The atrocity propaganda is lying. The Originators are politically and economically motivated. The same Jewish writers who allow themselves to be misused for this purpose, used to scoff at us veterans in earlier years.“ (Feuerzeichen, Ingid Weckert, Tubingen 1981, p. 52-54, with reference to Nation Europa 10/1962 p. 7f)
„...Each of you, Jew and gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in the sacred war should do so now...“ (Samuel Untermeyer, a radio broadcast August 6, 1933)
ROBERTS, STEPHEN H. 20th century Australian historian. Though hostile on almost every point to National Socialism, his The House that Hitler Built does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany: „It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany. The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin, for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and they had made great inroads on the educational system.“
Wednesday, September 24, 2025
Jewish and Zionist Influence in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2009 to 2025)
by Karl Radl
On 1st October 2009 a new institution was created in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland which aped the constitutional structure of its one-time colony: the United States of America.
Interestingly there is a significant aspect to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (hereafter Supreme Court) that needs to be documented that is how jewish it has been and continues to be.
When the Supreme Court was first established on 1st October 2009 it had twelve justices which has continued to be the case since.
The original twelve justices were:
Nicholas Phillips, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers (President)
David Hope, Lord Hope of Craigshead (Deputy President)
Mark Saville, Lord Saville of Newdigate
Alan Rodger, Baron Rodger of Earlsferry
Robert Walker, Baron Walker of Gestingthorpe
Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond
Simon Brown, Baron Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood
Jonathan Mance, Baron Mance
Lawrence Collins, Baron Collins of Mapesbury
Brian Kerr, Baron Kerr of Tonaghmore
Tony Clarke, Baron Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony
John Dyson, Lord Dyson
Of these twelve justices, a whopping four were jewish: Nicholas Phillips (the President), (1) Simon Brown, (2) Lawrence Collins (3) and John Dyson. (4) In addition to this Brenda Hale was – and is – a big supporter of Israel and has even been a lecturer at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. (5)
Thus 33.3% of the members of the Supreme Court at its inception were jewish, while jews are 0.5% of the population of Britain, which illustrates they are represented at roughly 66 times their relative representation on the original Supreme Court.
If we add in Hale – as known supporter of jewish and Israeli interests – then we get 41.6% of the members of the Supreme Court are known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests, which is pretty scary: isn’t it?
If we look at the current Supreme Court as of September 2024, we have the following justices:
Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir (President)
Patrick Hodge, Lord Hodge (Deputy President)
David Lloyd Jones, Lord Lloyd-Jones
Michael Briggs, Lord Briggs of Westbourne
Philip Sales, Lord Sales
Nicholas Hamblen, Lord Hamblen of Kersey
George Leggatt, Lord Leggatt
Andrew Burrows, Lord Burrows
Ben Stephens, Lord Stephens of Creevyloughgare
Vivien Rose, Lady Rose of Colmworth
David Richards, Lord Richards of Camberwell
Ingrid Simler, Lady Simler
Of these twelve justices, two are still jewish: Vivien Rose (6) and Ingrid Simler. (7) In additional to this Andrew Burrows is a big supporter of Israel and guest lectures at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem on occasion, (8) while Patrick Hodge is also a confirmed Christian philo-Semite and proponent of a ‘Judeo-Christian’ alliance (with Christians firmly as the subservient partner in that relationship). (9)
Thus 20% of the current members of the Supreme Court are jewish, while jews are 0.5% of the population of Britain, which illustrates they are represented at roughly 40 times their relative representation on the current Supreme Court.
If we add in Andrew Burrows and Patrick Hodge – as known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests – then we get 33.3% of the members of the Supreme Court are known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests, which is also pretty scary: isn’t it?
If take the Supreme Court over its entire existence from October 2009 to present (September 2025) then it has had the following members:
Nicholas Phillips, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers (1st October 2009 to 30th September 2012)
David Hope, Lord Hope of Craigshead (1st October 2009 to 26th June 2013)
Mark Saville, Lord Saville of Newdigate (1st October 2009 to 30th September 2010)
Alan Rodger, Baron Rodger of Earlsferry (1st October 2009 to 26th June 2011)
Robert Walker, Baron Walker of Gestingthorpe (1st October 2009 to 17th March 2013)
Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond (1st October 2009 to 10th January 2020)
Simon Brown, Baron Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood – (1st October 2009 to 9th April 2012)
Jonathan Mance, Baron Mance (1st October 2009 to 6th June 2018)
Lawrence Collins, Baron Collins of Mapesbury (1st October 2009 to 7th May 2011)
Brian Kerr, Baron Kerr of Tonaghmore (1st October 2009 to 30th September 2020)
Tony Clarke, Baron Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony (1st October 2009 to 30th September 2017)
John Dyson, Lord Dyson (1st October 2009 to 1st October 2012)
Nicholas Wilson, Lord Wilson of Culworth (26th May 2011 to 9th May 2020)
Jonathan Sumption, Lord Sumption (11th January 2012 to 9th December 2018)
Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir (6th February 2012 to Present)
Robert Carnwath, Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill (17th April 2020 to 15th March 2020)
David Neuberger, Baron Neuberger of Abbotsbury (1st October 2012 to 4th September 2017)
Anthony Hughes, Lord Hughes of Ombersley (9th April 2013 to 11th August 2018)
Roger Toulson, Lord Toulson (9th April 2013 to 22nd September 2016)
Patrick Hodge, Lord Hodge (1st October 2013 to Present)
Jill Black, Lady Black of Derwent (2nd October 2017 to 10th January 2021)
David Lloyd Jones, Lord Lloyd-Jones (2nd October 2017 to 13th January 2020 then 30th August 2020 to Present)
Michael Briggs, Lord Briggs of Westbourne (2nd October 2017 to Present)
Mary Arden, Lady Arden of Heswall (1st October 2018 to 24th January 2022)
David Kitchin, Lord Kitchin (1st October 2018 to 29th September 2023)
Philip Sales, Lord Sales (11th January 2109 to Present)
Nicholas Hamblen, Lord Hamblen of Kersey (13th January 2020 to Present)
George Leggatt, Lord Leggatt (21st April to Present)
Andrew Burrows, Lord Burrows (2nd June 2020 to Present)
Ben Stephens, Lord Stephens of Creevyloughgare (1st October 2020 to Present)
Vivien Rose, Lady Rose of Colmworth (13th April 2021 to Present)
David Richards, Lord Richards of Camberwell (3rd October 2022 to Present)
Ingrid Simler, Lady Simler (14th November 2023 to Present)
Of these seven out of a total 47 Supreme Court justices were/are jewish: Nicholas Phillips, Simon Brown, Lawrence Collins, John Dyson, David Neuberger, (10) Rose and Simler, while Brenda Hale, Patrick Hodge and Andrew Burrows are strongly supportive of jewish and/or Israeli interests.
Thus 14.9% of all members of the Supreme Court have been jewish, while jews are 0.5% of the population of Britain, which illustrates they are represented at roughly 30 times their relative representation on the current Supreme Court.
If we add in Hale, Hodge and Burrows – as known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests – then we get 25.5% of the members of the Supreme Court are known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests, which is rather frightening: isn’t it?
Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.
References
(1) https://www.thejc.com/how-jewish-is-lord-chief-justice-phillips-n30w2gn8
(2) https://www.thejc.com/news/obituary-lord-brown-of-eaton-under-heywood-dz4xbotw
(4) https://www.jewishrenaissance.org.uk/blog/john-dyson
(6) https://www.thejc.com/news/lady-justice-rose-to-join-supreme-court-p08pa604
(7) https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/uk-supreme-court-female-judge-lady-justice-simler-rrf3mtxb9
(8) https://www.bfhu.org/product/lecture-by-lord-andrew-burrows/
(10) https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/desert-island-books-lord-david-neuberger/
Monday, September 22, 2025
Saturday, September 20, 2025
The Jewish Gold Rush
By Dr. William Pierce
A subject we’ve discussed often enough for many of you to be tired of hearing about it is the continuing - make that the escalating - Jewish effort to extort reparations from the rest of the world for claimed injuries done to Jews of past generations by Gentiles of past generations. I would drop the subject, except that every week Jewish leaders make new demands which surpass all previous bounds for greed and arrogance. You wouldn’t believe the arrogance and pushiness of these Jews when they smell gold - except that it’s all documented, all in your daily newspaper for you to read. Therefore, this Great Jewish Gold Hunt makes a wonderful educational tool for helping others to understand the nature of the Jews, and I cannot resist using it.
You remember, this current gold hunt began early last year, when Jewish leaders came up with the idea of expanding their claim for reparations from the 1930s and 1940s to include countries besides Germany. They already had bled Germany for $60 billion since 1948, most of which went to Israel. That averages out to about $60,000 for every Jewish family of four now in Israel. Getting that money from Germany was relatively easy, because the Allied governments had an occupation army in Germany that was ready to squeeze the Germans whenever the Jews gave the word. All they had to do to keep the Germans from complaining about these massive extortion payments was step up their whining about gas chambers and about the soap and lampshades supposedly manufactured from the corpses of gassed Jews. When they really wanted to shut up the doubters and the questioners, they would have Steven Spielberg crank out a new Hollywood dramatization of the so-called „Holocaust,“ which would have the effect of making anyone so „insensitive“ as to think of denying the poor, persecuted Jews anything they demanded seem like a real heel to the public.
A few years ago they added a new twist to their racket by implying that it was not just the Germans who owed them reparations for having run Aunt Sarah and Uncle Abe through a crematorium at Auschwitz: everybody owed them for permitting the wicked Germans to „Holocaust“ Sarah and Abe. The United States and the other Western countries who fought against Germany during the Second World War could have stopped the „Holocaust“ if they really had wanted to, the Jews complained. The Allies could have bombed the rail lines leading to the German concentration camps, but they didn’t, the Jews complained. The Allies could have taken in many Jewish refugees fleeing from Germany before the war, but they didn’t: they turned the refugee ships back, and the Jews aboard them consequently perished in the „Holocaust,“ the Jews complained. „You could have saved millions of us if you really had wanted to, but you didn’t want to. It was your anti-Semitism which made you insensitive to our needs back in the 1930s and 1940s. So now you owe us.“
After a good, long whine along this line intended to soften up and „sensitize“ the Gentile world, and after a law prohibiting negative comments about identifiable ethnic groups was passed in Switzerland, the Jews became much more specific in their complaints. They claimed that many Jews who had stashed their money in secret, numbered Swiss bank accounts during the 1930s and early 1940s in anticipation of difficulties with the German authorities, subsequently died during the war, and their money still remained in the secret accounts. The Swiss had not done all they could to try to locate heirs of the depositors. They owed all of that money in dormant accounts to the Jews - plus interest, of course. The head of the World Jewish Congress, Edgar Bronfman, who also belongs to the family who owns the world’s biggest liquor company, Seagram, took charge of the effort to force the Swiss to pay up. Bronfman estimated that the amount owed to the Jews by the Swiss is $7 billion. Later the Jews expanded their claims to include insurance policies held by Jews who disappeared during the war and also gold used by the Germans to pay the Swiss for various commodities imported by Germany during the war. The Swiss should have known, claim the Jews, that some of that gold had come from confiscated Jewish assets. „Giff it back to us,“ the Jews now demand.
Of course, every large bank does have some dormant accounts, and in the case of Swiss banks, which always have taken pride in the confidentiality they offer to their customers, it is understandable that today Izzy and Rebecca may not have been able to get their hands on or even find the money that they believe Uncle Abe may have stashed in a secret account 60 years ago.
The Swiss bankers pointed out that they always have treated their Jewish customers just like everyone else, and that any heirs who establish their claims in the normal manner would receive whatever was in Abe’s account. The Jews feigned outrage at this response and accused the Swiss of being „insensitive“ for failing to take into account the fact that there were no death certificates or other documents for many of the Jews who disappeared during the war. Of course, with the widespread destruction that occurred during the war, the same is true for non-Jews.
A few Swiss officials recognized these Jewish claims for the shameless extortion effort that they are and publicly denounced them as such. Most Swiss politicians and bankers, however, were more concerned with not jeopardizing their public image by having the Jews unleash their media weapon, and so they took a conciliatory approach to the Jews. They made a special search of their accounts and then took the unprecedented step of publishing the names of all their depositors whose accounts had been dormant since the Second World War, so that Jews could more easily file claims. It turned out that only a very tiny percentage of these dormant accounts belonged to Jews. Of course, this was largely ignored by the media. And of course the Jews continued to whine about how the Swiss had wronged them. They added to their list of grievances the fact that the Swiss had interned Jews who came across the Swiss border during the war in their effort to avoid being arrested by the Germans. The Swiss put them into work camps for the duration of the war. One might think that the Jews would be grateful to the Swiss for this, but if you thought that then you don’t understand the Jewish mentality. Instead of being grateful to the Swiss for saving them from the Germans the Jews publicly lamented the fact that the Swiss made them work for their room and board. The media only occasionally mention that all able-bodied Swiss citizens were also forced to work during the war.
The Swiss are a bit naive when it comes to dealing with Jews, and so they have continued to try to appease them, even as the Jewish demands have escalated. The Swiss bankers and politicians got together recently, estimated the most the Jewish assets they might be holding could amount to is in the neighborhood of $150 million, multiplied that figure by four, and then offered to pay the Jews $600 million to settle all of their claims.
Now, if you understand the Jewish mentality, then you don’t have to be told how Bronfman and the other Jewish leaders responded to this offer. The Jews simply escalated their demands again. They feigned shock and outrage that the Swiss offered them only $600 million. Liquor czar and World Jewish Congress boss Edgar Bronfman scoffed at the $600 million offer and said that the Swiss owe his people billions of dollars, not millions. Israeli spokesman Yoram Dori called the Swiss offer „offensive“ and said: „If we were not dealing with such a tragic story, this would be laughable.“ Bronfman’s colleague in the World Jewish Congress, Israel Singer, claimed to be „pained“ by the Swiss offer and said that the offer had been made in a „shabby“ manner. Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles said of the Swiss offer: „We consider it a lack of seriousness on their part.“ He added that the offer „will be unanimously refused.“ New York Jewish lawyer Edward Fagan, who is representing more than 30,000 Jews claiming to be heirs to dormant accounts, called the Swiss offer „insulting“ and said, „My 31,000 clients will not stand for this... A billion dollars is not enough.“
Behind all of this pretended outrage and these claims of feeling insulted by the Swiss offer of $600 million is a lot of very cold-blooded calculation by the Jews. They simply believe that by using their media power and their virtually total control of the Clinton administration, the U.S. Congress, and several state legislatures they can squeeze substantially more than $600 million out of the Swiss. The Jews’ number-one step’n’fetchit in the Congress is New York Republican Senator Alphonse D’Amato, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. He is running for re- election in November and is counting heavily on Jewish support. After the Jews let their displeasure with the latest Swiss offer be known, D’Amato threatened to use the Senate Banking Committee for reprisals against Swiss banks operating in the United States. He said: „If they continue to proceed in this manner, whereby they are ducking their responsibilities, we have no other course in the Congress of the United States than to go forward.“
New Jersey state Assemblyman Joel Weingarten has introduced legislation to bar New Jersey from investing state funds in Swiss banks, and similar measures are moving forward in New York City and in the New York state legislature. In California, the Chinese State Treasurer, Matt Fong, also is eager to prove his loyalty to the Jews.
So confident are the Jews that ultimately they can pressure the Swiss into yielding to their demands that World Jewish Congress boss Edgar Bronfman already is talking publicly about other countries on the Jews’ hit list. „It’s not just the Swiss banks,“ he said in a published telephone interview with the New York Jewish newspaper Forward. „We still have problems with the Poles, with the French, the Dutch, the Belgians, the other neutrals.“ It’s pretty clear that after the Jews have sucked the Swiss dry they will be looking for blood from a long line of other countries they believe haven’t done enough for them recently.
A new line of attack which the Jews are using is that the European countries which claimed neutrality during the Second World War and refused to join the Jewish-American-Soviet crusade against Germany weren’t really neutral: they provided aid to the Germans, and so now they owe reparations to the Jews. Switzerland also had business dealings with the Allies, but this is ignored. A Jewish official in the Clinton administration, Stuart Eizenstat, has been especially active in pushing the idea that the neutral countries were guilty of not doing enough for the Jews. He has prepared a report for the U.S. State Department in which he strongly criticizes Sweden, Spain, and other neutral countries. Eizenstat concludes: „It is clear that these countries were committing unneutral acts, even by the standards of the times.“
The arrogance of Eizenstat’s complaint is really breathtaking, considering the fact that under Jewish pressure the Roosevelt administration, in 1939, 1940, and 1941, at a time when the United States was officially „neutral,“ was committing unneutral acts against Germany which dwarfed into insignificance anything the Swedes and the Spaniards might have been doing to help Germany. Not only was the Roosevelt government supplying first Britain, and later the Soviet Union, with vast supplies of war materiel, but Roosevelt was trying everything he could to provoke the Germans into some action that would give him an excuse to enter the war on the Jewish side. In September 1941, three months before the official entry of the United States into the war, he went so far as to order the U.S. Navy to shoot on sight at any German naval vessel encountered in the Atlantic.
Unfortunately, the historical facts of the behavior of all the parties involved in the Second World War are not presented to the American public by the mass media, but just the facts the Jews want the public to know about. The average citizen listens to the complaints of the Jews about the unneutral behavior of Switzerland, Sweden, and Spain and believes that there may be some justification to the Jewish demands for reparations. It never occurs to the average couch potato to ask, „Hey, what about reparations for all of the other peoples who were looted during the war?
Why are the Jews the only ones entitled to reparations? And if the Jews are entitled to reparations for losses that occurred 60 years ago, why shouldn’t the Palestinians be entitled to reparations for what the Jews stole from them much more recently?“
No, unfortunately, it doesn’t occur to the average American to ask such questions. He just accepts at face value whatever he reads in his newspaper or sees on his television screen. And as long as his newspaper and his television screen are controlled by the Jews, he’s not likely to see anything which would cause him to question the current Jewish demands for gold from the rest of the world.
You might wonder how anyone could possibly be as arrogant as the Jews are in their quest for reparations. I think that the best explanation for that is to be found in the Jews’ view of themselves and their relationship to the non-Jewish peoples of the world. This view is best expressed in documents the Jews themselves have written: documents such as their Talmud and their Old Testament. I understand, of course, that most Jews today are entirely secular and do not regard such documents with any special reverence or awe. Nevertheless, they provide wonderful insight into the Jewish mentality.
More than 3,000 years ago, when the immigrant Jew Joseph managed to become the most powerful bureaucrat in the Egyptian government by claiming to be able to interpret dreams for the superstitious pharaoh, according to the Old Testament book of Genesis, he acquired a monopoly control over the Egyptian grain market and doled out grain to the hungry Egyptian people or withheld it, according to his policy - although he invoked the name of the pharaoh in exercising his policy. He then invited his fellow Jews to come into Egypt and to „eat the fat of the land.“ Not surprisingly, this policy caused resentment toward the Jews by the Egyptians, and eventually the Egyptians, under a new pharaoh, threw the Jews out.
Now, it’s not really important whether or not this account in Genesis is historically accurate. What’s important is the Jews’ attitude toward this account, and their attitude is that it was right and proper for them to exploit the Egyptians, and that the Egyptians were persecuting them in expelling them. It was the Jews’ right to exploit the Egyptians, because whatever the Egyptians had really belonged to the Jews as God’s Chosen People.
One sees this attitude of „what’s yours is really mine, because I am a member of the Chosen People“ expressed over and over again in the Old Testament. In the book of Isaiah it is perhaps most explicit. Isaiah presents to his fellow Jews a vision of the future in which the Gentiles of the world will deliver all of their wealth to the Jews and will become the servants of the Jews. And anyone who refuses to pay reparations to the Jews will be punished severely: „The nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish.“ This is spelled out in detail in the sixtieth and sixty-first chapters of Isaiah.
Observant Jews focus their consciousness of their Jewishness on this assumed obligation of the Gentile world to turn its wealth over to them. They have a custom of attaching a little box to one of their doorposts, with a piece of parchment, called a mezuzah, in the little box. The parchment is inscribed in Hebrew characters with 22 lines from the Old Testament which epitomize to them what it means to be a Jew: that is, with the 22 lines they regard as the most important in all of their religious writings. These 22 lines are from the fifth book of Moses, also known as Deuteronomy. They stress the importance of Jews adhering to the contract they have with their tribal god. The interesting thing is that immediately following these 22 lines in Deuteronomy is spelled out what their god will give to them as his obligation under the contract. And what is promised to the Jews is essentially all the wealth of the world: specifically, all the wealth now in the hands of non-Jews. „Thy god shall . . . give thee great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not, and houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells digged which thou diggedst not, and vineyards and olive trees which thou plantedst not... Every place whereon the soles of your feet shall tread shall be yours.“ Remember, religious Jews regard this promise, this contract, as the core of their religion.
As you know, it is not my custom to bring religion into these broadcasts. I certainly don’t want to start any religious arguments among my readers. But I do think that a consideration of the nature of Jewish religious belief, as expressed in their religious writings, can shed some useful light on their attitudes today. Whether they are religious Jews or non-religious Jews they all seem to have the attitude that they have some God-given right to exploit the rest of us. If there are Jews who dissent from this policy of collecting reparations from the rest of the world, I would like to hear them speak up. So far they seem to be rather unanimous in their support of the notion that the Swiss owe them billions of dollars - and the Swedes and the Spaniards and, in fact, all the rest of us.