Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Bishop Tikhon speaks on possible ritual element in Romanov murders

Moscow, December 1, 2017

Even after his abdication, Tsar Nicholas II remained a symbolic, sacred figure, and therefore his murder could have a very specific ritualist meaning in many senses, His Grace Bishop Tikhon (Shevkunov) of Egorievsk, abbot of Moscow’s Sretensky Monastery and Secretary of the patriarchal commission tasked with studying the remains believed to belong to the Royal Martyrs, told RIA-Novosti.

“No one will deny that the emperor, even after his abdication, undoubtedly remained a symbolic, sacred figure. The murder of the tsar and his family, putting the final stamp on the existence of the hatred of the 300-year Romanov dynasty by the new authorities, was a matter bearing very special ritualistic, symbolic meaning for many,” Bp. Tikhon stated.

To the objection, “What ritualistic meanings could there be for the Bolsheviks?” Bp. Tikhon responded with his own question: “Isn’t Lenin’s mausoleum a sacred, symbolic, and ritualistic phenomenon?” The Bolsheviks and their associates, he added, were by no means strangers to a variety of ritualistic symbolism.

“Many people involved in the shooting, whether in Moscow or in Ekaterinburg, saw in the murder of the prostrate Russian autocrat a special ritual of retribution,” the patriarchal commission secretary added. Many different kinds of people surrounded the event, he stated, from sadistic criminals who wanted to personally torture the tsar and his family, to Yurovsky, the leader of the band of regicides, who later boasted of his role in the murders and felt himself to be someone “who performed a sacred historical mission.”

His Grace’s explanation comes on the heels of his statement at Monday’s conference “On the Murder of the Royal Family: New Evaluations and Materials. Discussion,” devoted to the various studies on the remains, that the majority of those involved in the ongoing scientific examinations believe there is evidence of ritual elements in the murder of Tsar Nicholas II and his family. He stated then that according to Yurovsky, all the victims were divided up between the shooters, but that the tsar’s remains show more bullet holes because “everyone wanted to be regicides,” that is, “for many it was a special ritual.”

His statement sparked controversy in both Russian and outside media, which tied his use of the phrase “ritual murder” to anti-Semitic accusations of previous centuries. Yurovsky himself, an atheist, was ethnically Jewish, while all the other perpetrators were Russian.

The Speaker of the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia Baruch Gorin, for example, was shocked to hear of Vladyka Tikhon’s statement. “For us it is all an absolute absurdity, for a number of reasons… It is shocking,” he told Interfax-Religion on Tuesday.

While stories of ritualistic murders are tied to various cults and religions, Gorin acknowledged, in Russian history and in the history surrounding the Royal Family, the notion of a ritual murder is “absolutely an anti-Semitic myth,” he stated, adding that the killers in question were, in fact, atheists—although, this is certainly a fact of which Bp. Tikhon is aware.

Western media, such as ABC News, picked up on Gorin’s concern, commenting that, “Some Christians in medieval Europe believed that Jews murdered Christians to use their blood for ritual purposes, something which historians say has no basis in Jewish religious law or historical fact and instead reflected anti-Jewish hostility in Christian Europe.” The article does, however, note that Bp. Tikhon himself said nothing about Jews or Judaism.

[A guilty conscience needs no accuser.]: The Jerusalem Post ran an article entitled, “Russian bishop claims last tsar murdered by Jews for ritual purposes,” also quoting from Gorin, and others, while not producing any quotes from Bp. Tikhon himself to back up the strongly worded title.

The Sretensky abbot addressed the topic again today at a press briefing during a break in the working sessions of the Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church which is currently meeting in Christ the Savior Cathedral, explaining that “ritual murder” in the case of the Royal Family is understood exclusively as “revolutionary, Bolshevistic retribution.”

Matters have been worked out with the local Jewish community as well, Bp. Tikhon explained: “I had a conversation with the head of the largest Jewish community in Russia, Alexander Moiseevich Boroda. He called me, I explained our position to him, and, as far as I understood, he was absolutely satisfied by this conversation and explanation—that it had all just been distorted.”

He added that the entire expert commission was “deeply outraged by the disgusting attempts to accuse us of xenophobia and anti-Semitism.” “No one mentioned anything about the nationality or religious affiliation of the shooters,” he said, adding that of the eight shooters, only Yurovsky was non-Russian, but he was not religiously Jewish, according to Interfax-Religion.

The Federation of Jewish Communities even agrees with Bp. Tikhon that the execution of the Royal Martyrs was a symbolic act, but rejects the use of the specific phrase “ritual murder” in relation to this event.

“It is obvious that the execution of the prisoners of the Ipatiev House was carried out by the godless Bolsheviks as a significant symbolic massacre,” Boroda stated today. However, “it is totally unacceptable to use in these processes the historically and ideologically-charged phrasing ‘ritual murder,’ evoking the obvious connotations,” he added.

It was announced today that the Russian Orthodox Church hopes to see the end of the examinations on the Ekaterinburg remains and to come to a decision on their authenticity or lack therefore sometime next year.

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

The New World Order

This video shows the New World Order that our chosen overlords have brought to fruition after destroying Europe’s best and brightest.

Narrated by Truth Media Films and Edited by The Impartial Truth. Check out the new site: www.impartialtruth.com/

Sunday, December 3, 2017

Jewish Religion, Jewish Politics, White Ruination

Jewish duplicity and flimflam are evident to even the most casual of observers who are willing to trust their eyes instead of unsupported, obviously wrong kosher lies. It is the omnipresent propaganda that turns the despicable, immoral, and hideously alien jewry into a collective patron saint of victimhood, immune not just from criticism but from the very thought of criticism in our debased era. The jews’ endemic use of double-meanings, connotation, and false dichotomies should be not at all surprising, given that a foundational belief of the two-faced chosenites is to have one rule for themselves and another for the goyim. The rat-faced men assure us that they’re just looking out for our best interests, and that it’s The Right Thing To DoTM.  Never mind the fact that the jews consider all non-jews to be nothing more than soulless animals, and if you’ve ever seen the horrors of a kosher slaughter you’ll understand how the “light of the world” feel about cruelty toward animals. One of the classic kosher cons is the conflation of the term “jew” as a reference to a race or a religion or an ethnicity. While keeping a straight face, the men in the weird little hats will bloviate about the jewish religion, only later to claim it is a race once it becomes more expedient to do so. If one points out this inconsistent usage the shrieking and wailing begins, followed by holohoax rants, the 6 gazillion, electric belts, German shepherds with poison teeth, and bedroom furniture.

Recently, many of the jewish groups that seem to spring up like poisonous mushrooms across USSA have begun crying out about the separation of church and state. This initially seemed odd, since the jews have burrowed their way deeply into every aspect of Weimerican government. But in this particular context, the jews will simply deny being a religion and claim to be a race or ethnicity instead; just pay no attention to the synagogues, the “g*d’s chosen people” moniker, and chicken sacrifices. The result will be a continuation of jewish groups receiving taxpayer funding, engaging in political activities, and being treated as tax-exempt organizations. The same goes for the cuck-o-licks and other kosher approved Christ-cuck institutions. If a “religion” advocates the surrender of White nations to the endless hordes of sewage colored proto-sapiens from the blackest parts of the globe, it will get a pass. What this seemingly odd and sudden semitic push for promoting the Establishment Clause of the CONstitution is really all about is selective enforcement against any purportedly religious group that resists the jewish agenda of White genocide. Rest assured, there will be no separation of the ZOG and state.

Jewish organizations nationwide, including at least one from the Bay Area, have gone on record saying they prefer the wall of separation between church and state to remain as high and impenetrable as possible.”

Funny how these conniving jewish organizations were conspicuously silent about the separation of synagogue and state when they were receiving $800 million in government grants and $2 billion from government payments for services. The cuck-o-lick branch of judaism swindled the taxpayers for another $1.6 billion at least. Of course both of these odious, government funded religious groups are heavily involved with saturating White homelands (and only White homelands) with the most primitive and savage humanoids from the darkest corners of the world. How many sullen, hostile, low-IQ aliens can completely immoral jews and JUDEO-cucktians import into a formerly safe White nation for $4.4 billion? Enough to commit White genocide.

As a minority group, Jewish interests have always been served by a strong separation of religion and state.”

If we are to believe that the jews, taken as a group, supposedly have a high verbal IQ, then the frequent use of imprecise diction by g*d’s chosen people must be intentional. Doesn’t the jewish state of Israel serve jewish interests without a strong separation of religion and state? What at first appears to be an idiotic and glaring omission is actually an example of the blatant Hebraic double standards that the jews use to further their pernicious nation-wrecking. The purpose of this sudden jewish interest in having a “big beautiful wall” between the state and religion is likely twofold. First, it allows the ZOG to deny funding to religious organizations that are not subservient to jewish interests. Second, and more importantly, it furthers the jewish efforts in subverting, destabilizing, and subjugating their hosts by divorcing them from their religion.  It is a tool to replace healthy, folkish religious beliefs that should inform the cultural and governmental practices of a people (a people free of jewish parasitism that is), with empty materialism and guilt-based jew worship.

[Senior Rabbi Jonathan] Singer has talked about immigration issues, for example, even protesting at the airport when the president’s travel ban against Muslims went into effect in late January. He also advocates for gay and lesbian rights, pointing out, “These are not Democrat or Republican issues. People can profoundly disagree, and they do. That’s a dialogue based in values.””

The hollowness of words uttered by lying jewish mouths is on full display. We need an impenetrable separation of religion and state, and politics and religion shouldn’t mix claims the jew. Then in the next breath, the rat-faced men explain how it’s perfectly fine for rabbis to promote the foreign invasion of White homelands, moose-limb rights, and the sodomite sickness. Just because the toxic talmud gives a religious imprimatur for abusing and enslaving the goyim doesn’t make them nonpolitical issues. Of course, the repulsive rabbi mixes in a little truth to make his lies more palatable: these issues truly are not grounded in the fake Democrat-Republican dialectic. They are issues of sovereignty, racial survival, and whether rootless, self-serving jews belong in White nations.

Rabbi David Booth of Congregation Kol Emeth, a Conservative synagogue in Palo Alto, and Rabbi Joel Landau of San Francisco’s Modern Orthodox Adath Israel, speak from the bimah about such issues as gun control, euthanasia, homosexuality and health care.”

In the “conservative” synagogue, the jews who want a total separation of religion and politics preach about such holy and spiritual topics as disarming the goyim, killing off Whites who are no longer useful consumer units, sodomy, and making your health decisions subordinate to government power.

The government should not commandeer the religious square in an attempt to dominate it,” he [Senior Rabbi Jonathan Singer] opines. “We are not a Christian, Jewish, Muslim or secular country. We are the American people.”

The term “American people” used to be synonymous with White people, but not any longer. Now there is no such thing as the American people. A people are protected by borders, we have none. A people are united by a common language and culture and religion, we have none. A people are motivated by shared racial and genetic interests, we have none. Instead the American people (we are told by the ZOG) are a “proposition nation” which, like a prostitute, has no virtue and will sell itself to the highest bidder. The American people, if such a thing can be said to exist, are now defined by empty materialism, instant gratification, a slavish belief in equalitarianism, an insipid and sciolistic celebration of any non-White culture, and a willingness to be ruled by jews in furtherance of ignorant shiftlessness.

The jewish nation-wreckers ruin White homelands by deracinating the people.  This is done, in part, by marginalizing their native religion. A people’s native religion is part of their culture, which, in turn, is an expression of the race-soul.  The America of today is the end product of two thousand years of religious subversion; a people who have been without the spiritual guidance of their native religion since it was supplanted by the JUDEO-cucktian mind virus those long millennia ago. In the absence of a spiritualism that is compatible with the White race and soul, there was no effective defense against the jewish poisons of hedonism, nihilism, degeneracy, and miscegenation that are being used to destroy the intellect, creativity, distinctiveness, and future of the White race. We must rekindle the belief in the gods of our forefathers, and the guidance we receive from those gods should be brought to bear on how our communities govern themselves. We cannot restore healthy and prosperous White homelands with someone else’s religion, particularly the religion of our implacable racial enemy. We must embrace the traditional European pantheon if we are to stop White genocide.

Monday, November 27, 2017

„Anti-Semitism” - Part III

Boston: A Harvard Divinity School professor, John Strugnell, was removed this week as chief editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls not only because of his poor health, but because of a tirade against Israel and Judaism, his colleagues said. The remarks, in which he called Judaism „a horrible religion“ that „should have disappeared,“ came as a surprise to some colleagues working with him to decipher the ancient texts of the Old Testament. Strugnell made the remarks in a recent interview published in Haaretz, a Tel Aviv news-paper. In the Haaretz interview, Strugnell, 60, said he was not against Jews but their religion, according to an account soon to be published in the Biblical Archaeology Review. „I can’t allow the word anti-Semitism to be used,“ he is quoted as saying, „Anti-Judaist, that’s what I am.“

In other words... what you are about to read are other people’s strong and often quite inflammatory Reactions... to a Hateful and very destructive Belief System... The believers of which, intent upon World Dominion and enslaving the masses, are following a carefully planned and systematic scheme... seemingly unconcerned about the Reproach and often Violent anger brought down upon the Whole of their people as a Consequence.

BTW: The ADL will not be able to defend you from IaHUeH on that soon coming day!... And if you would start reading the TORAH more instead of your Tragically Twisted Talmudic Traditions.. you would quickly redifine „anti-semite“ not to mention your whole way of thinking and relating with your Neighbors!!

POPE CLEMENT VIII: „All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor. Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live.“

THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees ordered that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the colony without authorization „use their endeavors that the said Jews may be removed from the Colony of Georgia, as the best and only satisfaction that they can give to the Trustees for such an indignity offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty’s Charter.“ (C. Jones, HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923: „The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which is increasing.“

JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316): „Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.“

PIUS VII. Known generally as an ‘anti-Semite’ by Jewish writers.

„A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict.“ (Letter of November 11, 1933)

„Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the Jews by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of them in my kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the most vile nation in the world.“ (Letter to his brother Jerome, King of Westphalia, March 6, 1808)

COMMUNITY OF STRASBOURG, FRANCE. In an address to the ASSEMBLEE in 1790, the city’s revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews, because: „Everyone knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one doubted they were foreigners... Let the ‘enlighteners’ stop defaming the Gentiles by blaming them for what is wrong with the Jews. Their conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the Jews might eventually give up every aspect of their separation and all the characteristics of their nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we might them judge them to be worthy of equality. (Tres Humble Adresse qui Presente la Commune de la Ville Strasbourg)

H. H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 - November 1, 1937: „In 1848 the word „anti-Semitic“ was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word „Jew.“ The right word for them is „Jew“...
„I implore all of you to be accurate - call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. No he has got you absolutely by the throat - that is your reward.“

CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate: „The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a national and patriotic duty - not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical and holy to react against them.“ (New York Herald Tribune, August 17, 1937)