By Denis Wise
The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Saturday, July 14, 2018
Thursday, July 12, 2018
Organised Crime vs. National-Socialism
Inspired by
Hitler’s success at restoring Germany’s pre-eminence and learning from Hitler’s
success in burying the effects of the recession, America’s white community in
the 1930s created over 100 pro-National Socialist organisations.
May 17, 1934
Ring-fenced by the First Amendment,
they held public rallies, paraded in uniforms, carried the German Worker’s
Party banners, and published anti-Bolshevik periodicals.
Organised crime in the United States
was largely under Jewish control. Free from constitutional legalities, the
mobsters confronted the workers who supported Hitler’s genuine non-Jewish
socialism.
May 17, 1934, Madison
Square, New York
National Socialist Bund rallies in
New York City created a dilemma for the city’s Jewish leaders. With 20,000
members, the Bund was the largest anti-Bolshevik group in the United States.
Jewish leaders wanted the rallies
stopped, but could not do so legally. Nathan Perlman, a former Republican
congressman, believed that the Jews should demonstrate more combativeness. In 1935,
he furtively contacted Meyer Lansky, a leading organised crime figure, and
asked him to help. Lansky related what followed.
Meyer Lansky:
Notorious Jewish Gangster
The Jewish lawmaker assured Meyer
Lansky that a blank cheque and legal assistance would be put at his disposal.
Lansky, dubbed ‘the mob’s accountant’, was the most notorious of America’s
mobsters; the gangster ran an international syndicate.
The mobster referred to Germany’s
Communists as “my brothers”. Lansky refused the judge’s offer of money and
assistance, but he did make one request. He asked Perlman to ensure that after
he went into action he would not be criticised by the Jewish press. The judge
promised to do what he could.
May 17, 1934, Madison
Square, NY
Lansky rounded up his mobsters who
disrupted National Socialist meetings. Young Jews not connected to him or the
rackets also volunteered to help. Meyer Lansky and others taught them how to
use their fists and handle themselves in a fight. Lansky’s crews worked very
professionally. The arms, legs and ribs of American workers were broken and
heads cracked and the Jewish mobster earned quite a reputation for doing this
work.
Lansky later described to an Israeli
journalist one of the onslaughts in Yorkville, the German neighbourhood in
northeast Manhattan:
“We got there in the evening and
found several hundred people dressed in their brown shirts. The stage was
decorated with a swastika and pictures of Hitler. The speaker started ranting.
There were only 15 of us, but we went into action. We attacked them in the hall
and threw some of them out the windows. There were fist fights all over the
place.
Most of the Nazis panicked and ran
out. We chased them and beat them up, and some of them were out of action for
months. Yes it was violence. We wanted to teach them a lesson.”
Reflecting on his role in these
episodes to me, Lansky fumed that he helped the Jewish community but was met
with abuse. He believed the city’s Jewish leaders were pleased with his
actions, but they failed to stop the Jewish press from condemning him. When the
newspapers reported on the anti-Bund incidents, they referred to Lansky and his
friends as ‘the Jewish gangsters’, which infuriated him.
Judd Teller, a reporter for a New
York Jewish daily, relates how he met one day with several men who said they
were from ‘Murder, Incorporated’. They wanted a list of ‘Nazi bastards who
should be rubbed out.’
Afraid of the consequences of the
casual murder of worker socialists the Jewish community was disinterested in
the extreme violence proposed by their mercenary mobster.
Lansky replied, “Tell them to keep
their shirts on. We won’t ice (murder) the bodies; only marinate them.”
According to Teller the attacks by the Jewish mobsters was sufficient
“marination” to drastically reduce attendance at Nazi Bund meetings, and
discouraged Bundists “from appearing in uniform singly in the streets.”
After a series of attacks, the
Bundists protested at having their meetings violently broken up and asked Mayor
Fiorello La Guardia for protection from the Jewish mobsters.
La Guardia agreed under certain
conditions. The Bundists could not wear their uniforms, sing their songs,
display the swastika and workers flag, and could not march to beating drums.
The Bundists agreed to his terms. La Guardia confined their parades to
Yorkville and assigned Jewish and African-American policemen to patrol the
route.
The Bund was also active across the
river in Newark, New Jersey, which had a large German-American community. As a
Jew, Abner Zwillman, who controlled the rackets in that city, was unwilling to
allow the workers to operate with impunity in ‘his territory’. In 1934, he
turned to Nat Arno, a Jewish ex-prize-fighter, and asked him to organise
against the socialists.
The Jewish gang’s most infamous
action occurred in Schwabbenhalle on Springfield Avenue bordering the German
neighbourhood in Irvington. According to Hinkes:
“The Nazi scumbags were meeting one night on
the second floor. Nat Arno and I went upstairs and threw stink bombs into the
room where the creeps were. As they came out of the room, running from the
horrible odour of the stink bombs and running down the steps to escape to go
into the street to escape, our boys were waiting with bats and iron bars.
It was like running a gauntlet. Our
boys were lined up on both sides and we started hitting, aiming for their heads
or any other parts of their bodies with our bats and iron bars. The Nazis were
screaming blue murder. It was one of the happiest moments of my life. It was
too bad we didn’t kill them all. In other places we couldn’t get inside, so we
smashed windows and destroyed their cars, which were parked outside. The Nazis
begged for police help and protection, however, the police favoured us.”
Heshie Weiner, another participant
in the fracas, remembers that one of the Nazis who came running down the
stairs, had the indiscretion to shout “Heil” and was met by a chorus of iron
pipes. Weiner claims that after this attack, “I never heard any more of Bund
meetings by the Nazis in our area.”
In Chicago, Herb Brin, who worked as
a crime reporter for the City Press, joined the local Bund as a spy for the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of the B’nai B’rith. He told me, “I joined the
Nazi party at the Hausfaterland on Western Avenue across from Riverview Park.
It was a hotbed of Nazi activity,” he recalled. From 1938 through 1939, Brin
kept the ADL informed about Nazi activities. What the ADL did not know was that
he fed information about Nazi marches and rallies to Jewish gangsters. “I
marched with the Nazis,” said Brin, “but I came back later with Jewish gangs
and we beat them up good.”
Monday, July 9, 2018
Friday, July 6, 2018
Irving on Churchill
By Theodore J. O'Keefe
Published: 1986-12-01
World-class historian David Irving is no stranger to readers of the JHR.
His address to the 1983 International Revisionist Conference, which appeared in
the Winter 1984 Journal of Historical Review ("On Contemporary
History and Historiography"), was something of a primer on Irving's
Revisionist historiographical method. It was spiced as well with tantalizing
hints of new directions in Irving's research and new book possibilities arising
from them.
Not the least among Irving's
revelations were those that touched on Winston Churchill, descendant of one of
England's greatest families and leader of his nation and its empire (as he
still thought it) at what many of his countrymen and many abroad still regard
as Britain's "finest hour." Readers will recall that Irving exposed
several instances of Churchill's venality, cowardice, and hypocrisy, including
Churchill's poltroonish posturing at the time of the German air raid against
Coventry and the facts of Churchill and his cronies' secret subvention by the
Czech government.
It will also be recalled that in his
lecture Irving spoke of his projected book on Winston Churchill, which at the
time was to be published in the U.S. by Doubleday and in Great Britain by
MacMillan, two great firms entirely worthy of an author who has been churning
out meticulously researched historical bestsellers for a quarter of a century.
As has been pointed out in recent issues of the IHR Newsletter,
Irving's challenges to the reigning orthodoxy have become so unbearable to the
Establishment that both the major houses refused to print the books as written.
The task has now been undertaken by a Revisionist operation in Australia.
Nearing completion, the new Irving book, Churchill's War, is slated to
be available from the IHR by the end of this year.
Last year David Irving made a
world-wide speaking tour, visiting North America (the U.S. and Canada),
Australia, South Africa, and Europe. He lectured on a wide range of topics
pertaining to the troubled history of our century, with his customary flair for
the pointed phrase and the telling anecdote. During one of his lectures,
delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia on March 31, 1986, Irving offered a
series of mordant new facts and insights on the life and career of Winston
Churchill.
At the outset of his lecture, Irving
remarked that the late Harold MacMillan (Lord Stockton), recently targeted by
Nikolai Tolstoy (The Minister and the Massacres) for his role in the forcible
deportation of tens of thousands of anti-Communist Cossacks, Byelorussians,
Ukrainians, and others to the U.S.S.R. after World War II, had stated that
Irving's Churchill book would "not be published by his company, over his
dead body." Clearly Lord Stockton's recent demise didn't alter things at
MacMillan, however.
Then Irving let out an electrifying
piece of information:
The details which I will tell you today, you will not find published in
the Churchill biography. For example, you won't even find them published in
Churchill's own biography because there were powers above him who were so
powerful that they were able to prevent him publishing details that even he
wanted to publish that he found dirty and unscrupulous about the origins of the
Second World War.
For example, when I was writing my Churchill biography, I came across a
lot of private papers in the files of the Time/Life organization in New York.
In Columbia University, there are all the private papers of the chief editor of
Time/Life, a man called Daniel Longwell. And in there, in those papers we find
all the papers relating to the original publication of the Churchill memoirs in
1947, 1949, the great six-volume set of Churchill memoirs of the Second World
War. And I found there a letter from the pre-war German chancellor, the man who
preceded Hitler, Dr. Heinrich Brüning, a letter he wrote to Churchill in August,
1937. The sequence of events was this: Dr. Brüning became the chancellor and
then Hitler succeeded him after a small indistinguishable move by another man.
In other words, Brüning was the man whom Hitler replaced. And Bruning had the
opportunity to see who was backing Hitler. Very interesting, who was financing
Hitler during all his years in the wilderness, and Brüning knew.
Brüning wrote a letter to Churchill after he had been forced to resign
and go into exile in England in August 1937, setting out the names and
identities of the people who backed Hitler. And after the war, Churchill
requested Brüning for permission to publish this letter in his great world
history, the six-volume world history. And Brüning said no. In his letter,
Brüning wrote, "I didn't, and do not even today for understandable
reasons, wish to reveal from October, 1928, the two largest regular
contributors to the Nazi Party were the general managers of two of the largest
Berlin banks, both of Jewish faith and one of them the leader of Zionism in
Germany."
Now there is a letter from Dr. Heinrich Brüning to Churchill in 1949,
explaining why he wouldn't give permission to Churchill to publish the August,
1937 letter. It was an extraordinary story, out of Churchill's memoirs, even
Churchill wanted to reveal that fact, you begin to sense the difficulties that
we have in printing the truth today.
Churchill, of course, knew all about lies. He was an expert in lying
himself. He put a gloss on it. He would say to his friends, "The truth is
such a fragile flower, the truth is so precious, it must be given a bodyguard
of lies." This is the way Churchill put it.
Irving went on to describe several
sources of secret financial support enjoyed by Churchill. In addition to money
supplied by the Czech government, Churchill was financed during the
"wilderness years" between 1930 and 1939 by a slush fund emanating
from a secret pressure group known as the Focus.
Irving on the Focus:
The Focus was financed by a slush fund set up by some of London's
wealthiest businessmen. Principally, businessmen organized by the Board of
Jewish Deputies in England, whose chairman was a man called Sir Bernard Waley
Cohen. Sir Bernard Waley Cohen held a private dinner party at his apartment on
July 29, 1936. This is in Waley Cohen's memoirs... The 29th of July, 1936,
Waley Cohen set up a slush fund of 50,000 pounds for The Focus, the Churchill
pressure group. Now, 50,000 pounds in 1936, multiply that by ten, at least, to
get today's figures. By another three or four to multiply that into Canadian
dollars. So, 40 times 50,000 pounds... about $2 million in Canadian terms was
given by Bernard Waley Cohen to this secret pressure group of Churchill in
July, 1936. The purpose was, the tune that Churchill had to play was, fight
Germany. Start warning the world about Germany, about Nazi Germany. Churchill,
of course, one of our most brilliant orators, a magnificent writer, did
precisely that.
For two years, The Focus continued to militate, in fact, right through
until 1939. And I managed to find the secret files of The Focus, I know the
names of all the members. I know all their secrets. I know how much money they
were getting, not just from The Focus, but from other governments. I use the
word "other governments" advisedly because one of my sources of
information for my Churchill biography is, in fact, the Chaim Weizmann Papers
in the State of Israel. Israel has made available to me, all Churchill's secret
correspondence with Chaim Weizmann, all his secret conferences. It is an
astonishing thing, but I, despite my reputation, in a kind of negative sense
with these people, am given access to files like that, just the same as the
Russian Government has, given me complete access to all of the Soviet records
of Churchill s dealings with Ivan Maisky, Joseph Stalin, Molotov and the rest
of them. I am the only historian who has been given access to these Russian
records. It is a kind of horse trading method that I use when I want access to
these files, because it is in these foreign archives we find the truth about
Winston Churchill.
When you want the evidence about his tax dodging in 1949 and
thereabouts, you are not going to look in his own tax files, you're going to
look in the files of those who employed him, like the Time/Life Corporation of
America. That s where you look. And when you're looking for evidence about who
was putting money up for Churchill when he was in the wideness and who was
funding this secret group of his, The Focus, you're not going to look in his
files, again you're going to look in the secret files, for example, of the
Czech government in Prague, because that is where much of the money was coming
from.
Irving then revealed further details
of Churchill's financing by the Czechs, as well as the facts of Churchill's
financial rescuer by a wealthy banker of Austro-Jewish origins, Sir Henry
Strakosch, who, in Irving's words, emerged "out of the woodwork of the
City of London, that great pure international financial institution." When
Churchill was bankrupted overnight in the American stock market crash of l938,
it was Strakosch, who was instrumental in setting the central banks of South
Africa and India, who bought up all
Churchill's debts. When Strakosch
died in 1943, the details of his will, published in the London Times included a
bequest of £20,000 to the then Prime Minister, eliminating the entire debt.
Irving dealt with Churchill's
performance as a wartime leader, first as Britain's First Lord of the Admiralty
and then as Prime Minister. The British historian adverted to Churchill's
"great military defeat in Norway, which he himself engineered and pioneered,"
and mentioned the suspicion of Captain Ralph Edwards, who was on Churchill's
staff at the time, that Churchill had deliberately caused the fiasco to bring
down Neville Chamberlain and replace him as prime minister, which subsequently
happened.
Irving spoke of Dunkirk:
In May, 1940, Dunkirk, the biggest Churchill defeat of the lot. It
wasn't a victory, it wasn't a triumph, nothing for the British to be proud of.
Dunkirk? If you look at the Dunkirk files in the British archives now, you will
find, too, you're given only photocopies of the premier files on Dunkirk with
mysterious blank pages inserted.
And you think, at first, how nice of them to put these blank pages in to
keep the documents apart. Not so. The blank pages are the ones that you really
want to be seeing. In some cases, of course, the blank pages are genuinely
censored with intelligence matters. But the other blank pages are letters
between Churchill and the French Prime Minister, Paul Reynaud, which revealed
the ugly truth that Churchill, himself, gave the secret order to Lord Gort, the
British General in command of the British expeditionary force at Dunkirk,
"Withdraw, fall back," or as Churchill put it, "Advance to the
coast." That was Churchill's wording. "And you are forbidden to tell any
of your neighboring allies that you are pulling out." The French and the
Belgians were left in the dark that we were pulling out.
I think it's the most despicable action that any British commander could
have been ordered to carry out, to pull out and not tell either his allies on
his left and right flanks that he was pulling out at Dunkirk. The reason I knew
this is because, although the blanks are in the British files, I got permission
from the French Prime Minister Paul Reynaud's widow. His widow is still alive.
A dear old lady about 95, living in Paris. And guiding her trembling hand, I
managed to get her to sign a document releasing to me all the Prime Minister's
files in the French National Archives in Paris. And there are documents, the
originals of the documents which we're not allowed to see in London and there
we know the ugly truth about that other great Churchill triumph, the retreat to
Dunkirk. If peace had broken out in June of 1940, Churchill would have been
finished. No brass statue in Parliament Square for Mr. Winston Churchill. He
would have been consigned to the dustbin of oblivion, forgotten for all time
and good riddance I say, because the British Empire would have been preserved.
We would, by now, have been the most powerful race, can we dare use the word,
the British race, the most powerful race on Earth.
Irving pointed out that Churchill
rejected Hitler's peace offers in 1939,1940, and 1941 (Irving supports the
thesis that Rudolf Hess’s flight to Scotland was ordered by the Führer). Irving
pinpointed one critical moment, and supplied the background:
The crucial moment when he managed to kill this peace offensive in
England was July, 1940. If we look at the one date, July the 20th, this I think
was something of a watershed between the old era of peace, the greatness of the
British Empire and the new era, the new era of nuclear deterrent and the
holocaust, the nuclear holocaust, July 20, 1940. Mr. Churchill is lying in bed
that Sunday out in Checkers when he gets a strange message. It's an intercept
of a German ambassador's telegram in Washington to Berlin. It's only just been
revealed, of course, that we were reading all of the German codes, not only the
German Army, Air Force and Navy Codes, but also the German embassy codes. And
if you're silly enough to believe everything that's written in the official
history of British Intelligence, you will understand that the only reason that
they released half of the stories is to prevent us from trying to find out the
other half. And what matters is that we are reading the German diplomatic codes
as well. On July 20th, the German ambassador in Washington sent an message to
Berlin saying that the British ambassador in Washington had asked him very
quietly, very confidentially, just what the German peace terms were. This, of
course, was the one thing that Churchill could never allow to happen, that the
British find out what Hitler’s peace terms are. He sends an immediate message
to the foreign office, to Lord Halifax, saying, "Your ambassador in Washington
is strictly forbidden to have any further contacts with the German ambassador,
even indirectly. " They were communicating through a Quaker intermediary.
Now, on the same day, Churchill sent a telegram to Washington ordering
Lord Lothian, the British ambassador in Washington, to have nothing to do with
the German ambassador. And the same day, he takes a third move to insure that
the peace moves in Britain are finally strangled at birth. He orders Sir
Charles Portal to visit him at Checkers, the country residence of British prime
ministers. Sir Charles Portal was Commander in Chief of Bomber Command. Now
what is the significance? Well, the significance is this. Up to July, 1940, not
one single German bomb has fallen on British towns. Hitler had given orders
that no British towns are to be bombed and, above all, the bombing of London is
completely forbidden and embargoed. Churchill knows this, because he's reading
the German codes, he's reading the German Air Force signals, which I can now
read in the German files. Churchill is reading the signals and he knows that
Hitler is not doing him the favor.
Hitler is still hoping that this madman in England will see reason or
that he will be outvoted by his cabinet colleagues. So he's not doing Churchill
the favor of bombing any English towns. Churchill is frantic because he thinks
he's being outsmarted by Hitler. On July the 20th he sends for Sir Charles
Portal, the Chief of Bomber Command, and he says to Sir Charles Portal, as we
know from records from Command to the Air Ministry, "When is the earliest
that you could launch a vicious air attack on Berlin?" Sir Charles Portal
replies to
Winston, "I'm afraid we can't do it now, not until September
because the nights aren't long enough to f1y from England to Berlin and back in
the hours of darkness. September, perhaps, and in September we will have the
first hundred of the new Sterling bombers..." But he also says, "I
warn you, if you do that, the Germans will retaliate. At present they're not
bombing English targets, they're not bombing civilian targets at all and you
know why. And if you bomb Berlin, then Hitler will retaliate against English
civilian targets." And Churchill just twinkles when he gets this reply
because he knows what he wants.
We know what he wants because he's told Joe Kennedy, the American
Ambassador, Joseph P. Kennedy, father of the late President, "I want the
Germans to start bombing London as early as possible because this will bring
the Americans into the war when they see the Nazis' frightfulness and above all
it will put an end to this awkward and inconvenient peace movement that's afoot
in my own Cabinet and among the British population." I've opened Kennedy's
diary, I've also read Kennedy's telegrams back to the State Department in Washington.
They're buried among the files. You can't find them easily, but they are worth
reading and you see in detail what Churchill was telling him. What cynicism.
Churchill deliberately provoking the bombing of his own capital in order to
kill the peace movement. He‘s been warned this would be the consequence, but he
needs it. And still Hitler doesn't do him the favor.
Irving then gave a detailed account
of the cynical maneuvering of Churchill to escalate the aerial campaign against
Germany’s civilian population to the point at which Hitler was driven to strike
back against Britain's cities, supplying the spurious justification for the
R.A.F.'s (and later the U.S. Army Air Force's) monstrous terror attacks against
centuries-old citadels of culture and their helpless inhabitants.
The British historian further
expanded on a theme he had touched on in his address to the IHR's 1983
conference: Churchill the drunkard. Irving substantiated his accusation with
numerous citations from diaries and journals, the originals of which often
differ from heavily laundered published editions. He concluded his address with
an anecdote of a ludicrous incident which found Churchill pleading with William
Lyon Mackenzie King, wartime prime minister of Canada, to shift production in
his countries’ distilleries from raw materials for the war effort to whiskey
and gin, twenty-five thousand cases of it. According to Mackenzie King’s
private diary, the Canadian prime minister tore up Churchill’s memorandum on
the subject at precisely twenty-five minutes to eight on August 25, 1943, and
Sir Winston had to soldier on through the war with liquid sustenance from other
lands and climes. As Irving emphasized, Churchill's drunken rantings, often
during cabinet meetings, disgusted many of his generals, as when, at a meeting
on July 6,1944, the prime minister told his commanders to prepare to drop two
million lethal anthrax bombs on German cities. Of this meeting Britain's First
Sea Lord, Admiral Cummingham wrote, according to Irving: "There's no doubt
that P.M. is in no state to discuss anything, too tired, and too much
alcohol."
Irving's demolition of the Churchill
myth, based on a wealth of documentary evidence, most of which has been
studiously avoided by the keepers of the Churchill flame, may constitute his
most important service to Revisionism. The legendary V-for-victory-waggling,
cigar-puffing "Winnie" is for many of a centrist or conservative bent
the symbol and guarantee that Britain and America fought and "won"
the Second World War for traditional Western values rather than to bleed Europe
white and secure an enormous geopolitical base for Communism.
Irving's Churchill biography
promises to make trash of authorized studies as that of Martin Gilbert (which
has already been described in private by one Establishment historian as
"footnotes to Churchill's war memoirs"). The publication of the first
volume of Churchill' s War later this year should be an
historiographical event of the first importance.
Tuesday, July 3, 2018
The (((Biblical))) US Immigration Policy
Somewhere in
the world, a little brown baby is crying. According to the jews and their
insane rabbinical logic, this means Whites everywhere should meekly surrender
their homelands, dig their own graves, and die. Please don’t have any White
babies, because those might lead to a future for the White race; and that is
precisely what the jews fear most. Instead, vapidly gaze into the talmudvision
and watch the endless, insipid images showing the natural consequences of the
r-selection reproductive strategy pursued by the dark, nightmare creatures
whose 80 IQ and underdeveloped frontal lobes hamper their capacity for drawing
cause-and-effect associations. They are your equals, say the jews; they’re just
as good as the children you didn’t have because they would have gotten in the
way of all that empty materialism and careerism. Keep watching the greasy tears
pouring down the fat, screaming face of that brown, vaguely human cowbird,
goyim. Then trust the sanctimonious, rat-faced man when he tells you that
flooding your homeland with a few billion of these sullen, hostile genetic
aliens is The Right Thing To DoTM.
If shamelessly preying upon the
empathy and altruism that are uniquely part of the White genetic inheritance
doesn’t convince you, the jew is ready with its old standby for persuading
Whites to act against their best interests: the (((Wholly Babble))).
Cucktianity is a perverse religion that was originally dreamed up by an unhinged
jewish subversive, and then purposefully weaponized by his tribal brethren as a
tool for destabilizing and destroying White societies. To this day, the
Christian branch of Judaism continues to be a spiritual sickness in many Whites
that causes otherwise functional people to enthusiastically support the
extinction of their own race through embarrassingly trite, but suicidal mantras
such as “love thy enemy” and “turn the other cheek.” As befits a weapon
designed by rootless jews, the universalist nature of JUDEO-Christianity was
intended from the beginning to provide a religious excuse for the foolish
belief that radically disparate and incompatible races could be “equal” (except
for Whites who are bad, and jews who are “g*d’s” favorites). This is a kosher
con-game that has consistently tricked Whites for 2,000 years, has done
immeasurable damage to the character and quality of the White racial lineage,
and has advanced the talmudic imperative to extinguish the White race into a
swamp of brown genetic sewage through miscegenation. It is spiritual cuckolding
that encourages racial cuckolding. It has been so successful, that the jews can
openly boast about it, as did (((Marcus Eli Ravage))) all the way back in 1928.
In the intervening 90 years since Ravage made it plain that “good cucktians”
were really dupes who had ill-advisedly swallowed kosher spiritual poison, the
brazen jewish arrogance has only gotten increasingly shrill. A rabbi in the
California failed-state is openly basking in the (((Biblical))) nature of U.S.
immigration policy.
Last week [Rabbi Jill Jacobs]
visited McAllen, Texas, with a group of clergy – including 10 rabbis – to bear
witness to the situation on the border, where new policies are forcing the
detention and separation of families and the refusal to hear asylum claims from
victims of gang and domestic violence.”
The Sanhedrin that truly rules
Weimerica heads to the world’s most porous, pathetic excuse for a border to
ensure that not even the most mild and ineffectual efforts are being made to
prevent a formerly safe and prosperous White homeland from being inundated by
the brown tide from the Central American cesspool. According to the jews, every
piece of worthless, welfare-seeking flotsam should be entitled to an “asylum
claim” just because they’re not White and want to pick carrion from the corpse
of the USSA. The legalistic jews knowingly fail to mention that being the
victim of crime, being impoverished, or simply crying crocodile tears does not
make one eligible for asylum. Did anyone notice the deafening silence from the
jews (who are so self-righteous and vocally aggressive in advocating for
non-White immigration of all kinds) when the question of whether the US should
consider the legitimate asylum claims from White South Africans?
We did…spend time with some of the
luckier families – those who were not detained at entry but instead were
granted a “credible fear” interview (the first step in the asylum process) and
released wearing ankle monitors. These families hoped to reunite with family
elsewhere in the country and pursue asylum claims in their new communities.”
How does our dysfunctional, corrupt,
and (according to a rabbi) JUDEO-Christian immigration system determine which
foreign invader to detain, and which to release into the heartland of our
ostensible “country”? We hire a bunch of patriotards to conduct “credible fear”
interviews! If a Mestizo is sober enough to mumble out, “Dey is goin’ to git
me, manng!” then he has a credible fear, and gets a free pass to join the
swelling colonies of his co-ethnics who are busily draining the precious
vitality from what was once a White nation with a future. The only ones that
get detained are the incompetent drug mules, notorious repeat offenders, and
likely anyone doesn’t look quite brown enough.
[Attorney General Jeff] Sessions
found a convenient justification for demanding obedience to an immoral law. Too
bad he didn’t look a bit earlier, to the story of Sodom…While Sessions probably
believes that the sin of Sodom concerns homosexuality, the Bible and rabbinic
tradition think otherwise. Per the Prophet Ezekiel, “This was the sin of your
sister Sodom: arrogance! She and her daughters had plenty of bread and
untroubled tranquility; yet she did not support the poor and the needy”
(Ezekiel 16:49).”
Hypocrisy and deceit come as easily
to the jew as breathing. The most arrogant species that has ever plagued the
face of the earth has the temerity to shriek at us about how politely asking
the most blatant violations of our sovereignty to stop is “arrogant” to an
extent that requires a visitation of divine wrath. The rotten rabbi Jacobs must
be very worried about her fellow tribe members in Israel who are deporting
all those poor and needy blacks seeking asylum. Just like in their
obscene religious texts, the jews will slander you if you resist their
open-border depredations; if the jews win, their slanders become history.
The Talmud goes on to imagine a
series of deceptive and violent practices that the people of Sodom would employ
to maim and starve any foreigners who dared enter their land… The ancient rabbis understood
that immoral societies such as Sodom justify themselves through the
establishment of unjust and immoral laws. So the Talmud identifies the four
judges of Sodom, whose names roughly translate as “Liar,” “Habitual Liar,”
“Forger” and “Perverter of Justice.”
Could those “foreigners who dared
enter their land” perhaps have been amoral, rootless merchants peddling filth,
pornography, and any other kind of hedonistic perversion that only a semitic
mind could fathom? Could the authors of the (((Wholly Babble))) and the toxic
talmud be describing a healthy reaction (one that has happened over a hundred
times in more recent history) to expel the nation-wrecking jews from a city or
country they had infested? Who would suspect “g*d’s chosen people” of a
relentless propaganda campaign to vilify a people who tried to unsuccessfully
resist their depredations?
We’re repeatedly bombarded by a
babble of broken pidgin English, spewing forth from angry, ugly brown faces,
ungratefully demanding our largess, our labor, and our land for their benefit.
We must not lose sight of the fact that this bombardment is being directed at
us by the jews. The non-White hordes deserve our resistance, our contempt, and
a show of our racial strength and pride for their opportunistic attacks on our
homelands; but it remains the jews who are ultimately culpable for
orchestrating their actions against us, and organizing them to have such a
concerted and devastating effect on White communities. We must not abrogate our
duty to protect our homelands, our people, and our future because some jews
will hurl invective at us. Whether we resist them or not, the jews will spit
their venom at us. If we allow the jews to dictate our immigration policy, we
will end up as hated minorities in our own lands, and vanish into the
deracinated mass of miscegenated morons over whom the jews wish to rule. We
must expose the JUDEO-Christian insanity for what it is: a shamefully
successful jewish ploy to manipulate Whites to their immense detriment. We need
to expose the fact that jews are openly using the (((Wholly Babble))) to
promote the continuing invasion of White homelands, and hopefully awaken our
race to the existential dangers of believing anything said by any jew (even
jewsus). We must stop the jewish-orchestrated White genocide.
Saturday, June 30, 2018
Wednesday, June 27, 2018
High Finance - Part II
Part II
„The responsibility for the last World War [WW I] rests solely upon the
shoulders of the international financiers. It is upon them that rests the blood
of millions of dead and millions of dying.“ (Congressional
Record, 67th Congress, 4th Session, Senate Document No. 346)
„How then was it that this Government [American], several years after
the war was over, found itself owing in London and Wall Street several hundred
million dollars to men who never fought a battle, who never made a uniform,
never furnished a pound of bread, who never did an honest day’s work in all
their lives?...The facts is, that billions owned by the sweat, tears and blood
of American laborers have been poured into the coffers of these men for absolutely
nothing. This ‘sacred war debt’ was only a gigantic scheme of fraud, concocted
by European capitalists and enacted into American laws by the aid of American
Congressmen, who were their paid hirelings or their ignorant dupes. That this
crime has remained uncovered is due to the power of prejudice which seldom
permits the victim to see clearly or reason correctly: ‘The money power
prolongs its reign by working on prejudices. ‘Lincoln said.“ (Mary
E. Hobard, The Secrets of the Rothschilds).
„If this mischievous financial policy [the United States Government
issuing interest-free and debt-free money] which had its origin in the North
American Republic during the war (1861-65) should become indurated down to a
fixture, then that Government will furnish its money without cost. It will pay
off its debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to
carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the
history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all
countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it
will destroy every Monarch on the globe!“ (London
Times Editorial, 1865)
„[The world] forgets, in its ignorance and narrowness of heart, that
when we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers
of the revolutionary party; when we rise, there rises also the terrible power
of the purse.“ (The Jewish State, New York, 1917)
„I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the
banks can, and do, create money...And they who control the credit of the nation
direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the
destiny of the people.“ (Reginald McKenna, former
Chancellor of the Exchequer, January 24, 1924)
„Five men meet in London twice daily and decide the world price of gold.
They represent Mocatta & Goldsmid, Sharps, Pixley Ltd., Samuel Montagu
Ltd., Mase Wespac Ltd. and M. Rothschild & Sons.“ (L.A.
Times-Washington Post, 12/29/86)
„The division of the United States into two federations of equal force
was decided long before the Civil War by the High [Jewish] Financial Powers of
Europe. These bankers were afraid of the United States, if they remained in one
block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence,
which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the
Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw tremendous booty if they could
substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the Jewish financiers, to the
vigorous Republic, confident and self-providing. Therefore, they started their
emissaries to work in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus to dig
an abyss between the two parts of the Republic...’“ (La
Vieille France, No. 216, March, 1921)
Walther Rathenau, the Jewish banker behind the Kaiser, writing in the
German Weiner Frei Presse, December 24th, 1912, said: „Three hundred men, each
of whom knows all the other, govern the fate of the European continent, and
they elect their successors from their entourage.“ Confirmation of Rathenau’s
statement came twenty years later in 1931 when Jean Izoulet, a prominent member
of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universelle, wrote in his Paris la Capitale
des Religions: „The meaning of the history of the last century is that today
300 Jewish financiers, all Masters of Lodges, rule the world.“ (Waters
Flowing Eastward, p. 108)
„From the strictly financial point of view, the most disastrous events
of history, wars or revolutions, never produce catastrophes, the manipulators
of money can make profit out of everything provided that they are well-informed
before-hand...It is certain that the Jews scattered over the whole surface of
the globe are particularly well placed in this respect.“ (G.
Batault, Le problème juif; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 136)
„I know of nothing more cynical than the attitude of European statesmen
and financiers towards the Russian muddle. Essentially it is their purpose, as
laid down at Genoa, to place Russia in economic vassalage and give political
recognition in exchange. American business is asked to join in that helpless,
that miserable and contemptible business, the looting of that vast domain, and
to facilitate its efforts, certain American bankers engaged in mortgaging the
world are willing to sow among their own people the fiendish, anti-democratic
propaganda of Bolshevism, subsidizing, buying, intimidating, cajoling. There
are splendid and notable exceptions but the great powers of the
American-Anglo-German financing combinations have set their faces towards the
prize displayed by a people on their knees. Most important is the espousal of
the Bolshevist cause by the grope of American, Anglo-German bankers who like to
call themselves international financiers to dignify and conceal their true
function and limitation. Specifically the most important banker in this group
and speaking for this group, born in Germany as it happens, has issued orders
to his friends and associates that all must now work for Soviet recognition.“ (Article
by Samuel Gompers, New York Times, May 7, 1922; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 133)
„The mode of government which
is the most propitious for the full development of the class war, is the
demagogic regime which is equally favorable to the two fold intrigues of
Finance and Revolution. When this struggle is let loose in a violent form, the
leaders of the masses are kings, but money is god: the demagogues are the
masters of the passions of the mob, but the financiers are the master of the
demagogues, and it is in the last resort the widely spread riches of the
country, rural property, real estate, which, for as long as they last, must pay
for the movement.
When the demagogues prosper
amongst the ruins of social and political order, and overthrown traditions,
gold is the only power which counts, it is the measure of everything; it can do
everything and reigns without hindrance in opposition to all countries, to the
detriment of the city of the nation, or of the empire which are finally ruined.
In doing this do not
financiers work against themselves? It may be asked: in destroying the
established order do not they destroy the source of all riches? This is perhaps
true in the end; but whilst states which count their years by human
generations, are obliged in order to insure their existence to conceive and
conduct a far-sighted policy in view of a distant future, Finance which gets
its living from what is present and tangible, always follows a short-sighted
policy, in view of rapid results and success without troubling itself about the
morrows of history.“ (G. Batault, Le problème juif, p. 257; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 135-136)
„The full history of the interlocking participation of the Imperial
German Government and international finance in the destruction of the Russian
Empire is not yet written...It is not a mere coincidence that at the notorious
meeting held at Stockholm in 1916, between the former Russian Minister of the
Interior, Protopopoff, and the German Agents, the German Foreign Office was
represented by Mr. Warburg, whose two brothers were members of the
international banking firm, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, of which the late Mr. Jacob
Schiff was a senior member.“ (The World at the Cross Roads, by
Boris Brasol, pp. 70-71; Rulers of Russia, Rev. Denis Fahey, p. 7)
„The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timeliness today, for the
real menace of our republic is this Invisible Government which like a Giant
Octopus sprawls its slimy length over the city, STATE AND NATION. Like the
octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self-created screen. It
seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our
legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency
created for the public protection. It squirms in the jaws of darkness and thus
is the better able to clutch the reins of government, secure enactment of the
legislation favorable to corrupt business, violate the law with impunity,
smother the press and reach into the courts. To depart from mere
generalizations, let say that at the head of this octopus are the
Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses
generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful
international bankers virtually run the United States Government for their own
selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, write political
platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private
organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high
public office only such candidates as well be amenable to the dictates of
corrupt big business. They connive at centralization of government on the
theory that a small group of hand-picked, privately controlled individuals in
power can be more easily handled than a larger group among whom there will most
likely be men sincerely interested in public welfare. These international
bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of the
newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers
to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to
do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible
government.“ (Former New York City Mayor John Haylan
speaking in Chicago and quoted in the March 27, 1927 New York Times)
In „Washington Dateline,“ the president of The American Research
Foundation, Robert H. Goldsborough, writes that he was told personally by Mark
Jones {one-time financial advisor to the late John D. Rockefeller, Jr., and
president of the National Economic Council in the 1960s and 1970s} „that just four men, through their interlocking directorates on boards
of large corporations and major banks, controlled the movement of capital and
the creation of debt in America. According to Jones, Sidney Weinberg, Frank
Altshul and General Lucius Clay were three of those men in the 1930s, ‘40s, ‘50s,
and ‘60s. The fourth was Eugene Meyer, Jr. whose father was a partner in the
immensely powerful international bank, Lazard Freres...Today the Washington
Post {and Newsweek} is controlled by Meyer Jr.’ daughter Katharine Graham.“
WALTER CRICK, British Manufacturer, in the NORTHAMPTON DAILY ECHO, March
19. 1925): „Jews can destroy by means of finance. Jews
are International. Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of
the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the British Empire
ever had to face.“
This startling piece of prediction is particularly impressive to those
who have observed the Soviet scene and notice its strange relationship with
capitalist financiers - overwhelmingly Jewish - since the revolution. The line
runs from Olof Aschberg, self-described „Bolshevik banker“ who ferried to
Trotsky the huge sums raised for the revolution by financiers in Europe and
America, to Armand Hammer in the 1970s, who has specialized in
multimillion-dollar trade concessions with the now supposedly ‘anti-Semitic’
commissars.
PRIMO DE RIVERA, JOSE. 20th century Spanish political reformer
(assassinated by the Communists). He stressed that the
instruments of Jewish domination in the modern world are money and the press,
and that communism is an instrument of international Jewish capitalism used to
smash and afterwards rule the nations. (El
Estado Nacional)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)