Source:
http://www.renegadetribune.com/when-truth-fears-investigation-on-august-5th-we-honor-the-life-of-ernst-zundel/
By John Wear
August 5, 2018 marks
the one-year anniversary of Ernst Zündel’s passing. He was essentially
kidnapped from the U.S. and forced to remain in Germany. His wife, Ingrid
Rimland, was unable to leave the U.S. to be with him. She risked jail time in
Germany despite having no previous criminal convictions.
His crime? Ernst Zündel was deemed a “security
threat.” Not because he was ever violent or ever incited violence, but because
he created a legal precedent in which:
For the first time ever, “Holocaust” survivors
and “Holocaust” historians were closely and critically questioned under oath
about their claims and views.
Few Canadians realize that Zündel did them “a
favor by wiping off the books [the] disgraceful False News laws” strangling
free-speech.
What They Do Not Tell You About the Life and Work of Ernst Zündel
Ernst Zündel (1939-2017) was a German-born publisher, author and civil
rights activist, who emigrated to Canada at the age of 19. He became a
successful graphic artist, with his work appearing, for example, on the front
cover of Canada’s national news magazine, Maclean’s. Setting aside
his thriving career, he dedicated himself to the great task, as he saw it, of
redeeming the sullied reputation of his fellow Germans.
For seven years he was held behind bars, first in Canada and then in
Germany, solely for the peaceful expression of non-conformist views. For some
time he was the most prominent political prisoner in the western world.
Zündel was an outgoing, good-humored man who was blessed with a rare
combination of unflagging optimism and practical ability. He was perhaps best
known as the defiant defendant in the much-publicized “Holocaust Trials” of
1985 and 1988. He was brought to court in Toronto on a charge of “publishing
false news,” and specifically for publishing a reprint edition of a booklet
entitled Did Six Million Really Die?
Zündel’s two lengthy trials were something close to full scale debates on
the Holocaust issue.
For the first time ever, “Holocaust” survivors and “Holocaust” historians
were closely and critically questioned under oath about their claims and views.
To wage the legal battle that was forced upon him, he brought together an
impressive international team of researchers, legal specialists, scholars, and
many others. From numerous libraries and archives in North America and Europe,
this group assembled at the “Zündelhaus” in Toronto one of the most extensive
collections of evidence anywhere on this chapter of history.
Among those who testified on Zündel’s behalf in the trials were Robert
Faurisson, David Irving, Mark Weber, William Lindsey, Udo Walendy, and Bradley
Smith. As a result of the two trials, an enormous quantity of evidence and
testimony challenging the prevailing Holocaust narrative was presented to the
court and thereby was made part of the permanent public record. Perhaps the
most important evidence was the historic testimony of American gas chamber
expert Fred Leuchter concerning his on-site forensic examination of the alleged
extermination gas chambers in Poland.
Zündel was found guilty in the 1985 trial, but the verdict was set aside by
the provincial appeals court. It ruled that the judge in that trial had, among
other things, given improper instructions to the jury, and had improperly
excluded defense evidence. At the conclusion of the second Zündel trial in May
1988, a jury declared him guilty. A few days later, he was sentenced to nine
months imprisonment.
French scholar Robert Faurisson wrote at the time:
Zündel may once again go to prison for his
research and beliefs or be threatened with deportation. All this is
possible. Anything may happen when there is an intellectual crisis and
a realignment of historical concepts of such a dimension. Revisionism
is the great intellectual adventure of the end of this century. Whatever
happens, Ernst Zündel is already the victor.”
On appeal, Canada’s Supreme Court threw out the 1988 conviction, declaring
on August 27, 1992, that the archaic “false news” law under which Zündel had
been tried and convicted was a violation of the country’s Charter of Rights.
This was more than a personal vindication by Canada’s highest court; Ernst Zündel
secured an important victory for the rights of all Canadians.
His next great legal battle was fought before the Canadian Human Rights
Tribunal [which operates outside of normal legal standards] in
Toronto. The charges, instigated by Jewish groups, accused Zündel of promoting
“hatred or contempt” against Jews through the “Zündelsite” website operated by
Ingrid Rimland from the United States. In this legal action, as the Tribunal’s
presiding Commissioner declared, the truth or validity of the supposedly
“hateful” items was not a consideration. (Ultimately the Tribunal declared the
“Zündelsite” to be unlawful, but because it is based in the U.S., the ruling
has been unenforceable).
During the 42 years he lived in Canada (1958-2000), Ernst Zündel was never
convicted of a crime. He was, however, repeatedly a victim of violence and
hate. He survived three assassination attempts, including by arson and pipe
bomb. Even Irv Rubin, the American Jewish Defence League leader, was caught
breaking into Zündel’s home with a member of the “Jewish Armed Resistance
Movement” who had previously claimed responsibility for one of the arson
attacks. He also endured years of legal harassment and repeated imprisonment.
After more than four decades in Canada, including a failed effort to
acquire Canadian citizenship, Zündel moved to the United States. On February 5,
2003, Ernst Zündel was arrested at home in the mountain region of eastern
Tennessee. U.S. authorities seized him on the pretext that he had violated
immigration regulations, or had missed an interview date with U.S. immigration
authorities, even though he had entered the U.S. legally, was married to Ingrid
Rimland, an American citizen, had no criminal record, and was acting
diligently, and in full accord with the law, to secure status as a permanent
legal resident.
After being held for two weeks, he was deported to Canada. For two years —
from mid-February 2003 to March 1, 2005 — he was held in solitary confinement
in the Toronto West Detention Centre as a supposed threat to national security.
His arrest and detention generated widespread media attention. A few
Canadian newspapers and several independent analysts acknowledged the injustice
of his incarceration. The country’s most prestigious daily, the Toronto
Globe and Mail, affirmed in an editorial (“Zündel doesn’t warrant a
security certificate,” March 6, 2004) that he posed no risk to
people or property, and that he was being held unjustly on a bogus “guilt by
association” pretext.
He has never been charged with a violent crime
and does not urge others to commit violence,” the editorial noted. “The real
danger to Canadians,” it concluded, comes not from individuals like Zündel,
“but from a government that casually discards their most precious rights.”
In another editorial (“The Zündel Case,” Oct. 23, 2004) the influential
paper called Canada’s treatment of Zündel an “abuse of the secret-trial
legislation.”
Bill Dunphy, a veteran investigative journalist and editor for the
daily Hamilton Spectator, also protested the injustice. He spent
six years probing Canada’s “white supremacist” movement, and got to know Zündel
well. Although he has no sympathy for Zündel’s views, in a hard-hitting column
(Hamilton Spectator, May 14, 2003) he told readers:
Our government has seized and branded Ernst
Zündel, stripped him of his human rights, tried him in secret and found him
wanting, and will now hand him over to a foreign government anxious to throw
him in jail …
… Zündel – who did this country a favor by
wiping off the books our disgraceful False News laws – has never once been
convicted of a criminal offense in this country, never once found to have
violated the hate crime laws that rest snugly around the throat of free
expression in this country.
Calculating correctly that there was no
political cost, no ‘down side’ to slipping on the jackboots to kick a reviled
old man out of our country, our government cobbled together their best insults
and innuendo, and Lord knows what secret ‘evidence,’ and branded Ernst Zündel a
threat to national security.
I know this man, his local and international
contacts and I know this movement. And after reading the 58-page ‘unclassified’
summary of the government’s case, I can assure you there is no justice here.
Their ‘evidence’ is riddled with errors and misinformation, hearsay and
inflammatory innuendo. Dead men walk again, and the shattered bits of shoddy
secret networks long since collapsed under the weight of their own ineptitude
are made whole and menacing once again. It is a shameful piece of dishonest,
unreliable tripe.”
Zündel was held in Canada not because his views are unpopular, or because
he was a “security risk.” He was in prison because Jewish groups wanted him
there, and because he promoted views that the Jewish-Zionist lobby considers
harmful to its interests.
This lobby was the decisive, critical factor in the decades-old campaign to
silence him. The only sustained and institutionalized effort in Canada to
imprison Zündel came from this lobby, which includes the Simon Wiesenthal
Center, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance
Association, and the League for Human Rights of B’nai B’rith (Canada’s
counterpart to the U.S.-based “Anti-Defamation League”).
On March 1, 2005, Zündel was deported to Germany, just as Jewish groups had
been demanding. Upon his arrival at Frankfurt airport, he was immediately
arrested and taken to Mannheim prison to await trial for the “thought crime” of
“denying the Holocaust.”
A few months later the public prosecutor in Mannheim formally charged
Zündel with inciting “hatred” by having written or distributed texts that
“approve, deny or play down” genocidal actions carried out by Germany’s wartime
regime, and which “denigrate the memory of the [Jewish] dead.” …. The 14
specific violations cited by the court included postings on the U.S.-based “Zündelsite”
website. The court thus upheld efforts by German authorities to punish
individuals for writings that are legal in the country where they are
published. Jewish groups quickly, and predictably, expressed approval of the
verdict.
Zündel was released from prison on March 1, 2010 — five years after his
deportation to Germany, and three years after his conviction by a court in
Mannheim. Banned from returning to either Canada or the U.S., he went to his
family home in Germany’s Black Forest region, where he resided until his death.
Unable to leave the U.S. and be with him, his wife Ingrid Rimland died two
months later.
