Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Validating the Alexander Solzhenitsyn “Bolsheviks were not Russians” Quote

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/validating-the-alexander-solzhenitsyn-bolsheviks-were-not-russians-quote/

 

by Karl Radl

 

Recently I was asked to validate the following Alexander Solzhenitsyn quote that is often found in – and cited by – various anti-jewish memes seeking to raise the awareness about the historical reality of Judeo-Bolshevism and the strong jewish historical relationship (and association) with communism internationally.

 

I was able to give my initial observations, but I didn’t properly validate it which I will do here.

 

The quote as given in memes such as the ones below is as follows:

 

The quote from Solzhenitsyn is that:

 

‘You must understand. The Ieading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.’

 

The origin of this quote is from the introduction to David Duke’s 2013 book ‘The Secret Behind Communism’ where he gives the quote, and its context as follows:

 

‘”You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse.

 

The October Revolution was not what you call in America the ‘Russian Revolution.’

 

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people.

 

More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history.

 

It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time.

 

The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.”!

 

— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

 

These were startling words, spoken to me by the famous Russian writer and philosopher Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn when I had the privilege of meeting him in Moscow in 2002.’ (1)

 

Now clearly the meme quote has been substantially altered with the first and the last two paragraphs put together with Solzhenitsyn comments in the middle removed. This is understandable as it doesn’t significantly alter Solzhenitsyn’s meaning and if anything, actually tones it down with Solzhenitsyn’s original quote being both more lengthy and more extended.

 

So far so good but is this quote actually from Solzhenitsyn given that we only have Duke’s word that he stated this to him when Duke was in Ukraine in 2002. This means that Solzhenitsyn’s having said it is hearsay and while Duke’s authority is in my opinion insufficient by itself to believe it to be a correct and true representation of Solzhenitsyn’s comments to him (and specific views).

 

We do thankfully have two reasons to believe it to be accurate.

 

Firstly, we have the fact that Solzhenitsyn has never denied he said this despite the prevalence of the quote in the English-speaking world and Solzhenitsyn also speaks English. We would reasonably suspect had this quote be inaccurate then Solzhenitsyn would have publicly denied it and this would have been at least somewhat trumpeted round the world as an attack on David Duke and used as ‘another example’ of why ‘anti-Semites are liars’ and not to be trusted.

 

Secondly, we have Solzhenitsyn’s own works which argue pretty much the same thing.

 

For example, in his famous ‘The Gulag Archipelago’ he implies that the Bolshevik revolution was in fact a jewish and not a Russian revolution when he states that:

 

‘The names of the six principal lieutenants of Stalin and Yagoda, the chief overseers of Belomor, six hired murderers each of whom accounted for thirty thousand lives: Firin – Berman – Frenkel – Kogan – Rappoport – Zhuk.’ (2)

 

Similarly, decades later Solzhenitsyn writes in his ‘Two Hundred Years Together’ concerned jewish involvement in the Bolshevik revolution that:

 

‘What about the Jewish renegades? As we have seen, during the year 1917, there was no particular attraction for the Bolsheviks that manifested among the Jews. But their activism has played its part in the revolutionary upheavals. At the last Congress of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) (London, 1907), which was, it is true, common with the Mensheviks, of 302- 305 delegates, 160 were Jews, more than half—it was promising. Then, after the April 1917 Conference, just after the announcement of the explosive April Theses of Lenin, among the nine members of the new Central Committee were G. Zinoviev, L. Kamenev, la. Sverdlov. At the Vlth summer Congress of the RKP (b) (the Russian Communist Party of the Bolsheviks, the new name of the RSDLP), eleven members were elected to the Central Committee, including Zinoviev, Sverdlov, Trotsky, Uritsky. Then, at the “historic meeting” in Karpovka Street, in the apartment of Himmer and Flaksermann, on 10 October 1917, when the decision to launch the Bolshevik coup was taken, among the twelve participants were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Uritsky, Sokolnikov. It was there that was elected the first “Politburo” which was to have such a brilliant future, and among its seven members, always the same: Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sokolnikov. Which is already a lot. D. S. Pasmanik clearly states: “There is no doubt that the Jewish renegades outnumbered the normal percentage…; they occupied too great a place among the Bolshevik commissioners.”’ (3)

 

Given that Solzhenitsyn published the second and last volume of ‘Two Hundred Years Together’ in 2002 at roughly the same time that he allegedly uttered the words that Duke is quoting and that Solzhenitsyn’s thesis in ‘Two Hundred Years Together’ is extremely close to Duke’s thesis albeit Solzhenitsyn’s contains significant caveats to it that Duke’s own does not.

 

We thus have every reason to believe that while Duke is an imperfect vehicle for transmission of the quote; the quote he gives is never-the-less extremely likely to be genuine.

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies. This post is public so feel free to share it.


References

 

(1) David Duke, 2013, ‘The Secret Behind Communism: The Ethnic Origins of the Russian Revolution & The Greatest Holocaust in the History of Mankind’, 1st Edition, Free Speech Press: Mandeville, p. 11

 

(2) Alexander Solzhenitsyn, 1986, ‘The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956: An Experiment in Literary Investigation’, 1st Edition, The Harvill Press: London, pp. 205-208

 

(3) Alexander Solzhenitsyn, 2017, [2002], ‘Two Hundred Years Together’, 1st Edition, The Incorrect Library: Internet, p. 435

 

via Karl Radl’s Substack

Sunday, November 3, 2024

Interview with Gauleiter Ludwig Ruckdeschel

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/ss-obersturmbannfuhrer-ludwig-ruckdeschel/

 

This is an interview with Ludwig Ruckdeschel, former Gauleiter, member of the Reichstag, Waffen-SS, company commander in the 12. SS Division Hitlerjugend and member of the SA (Sturmabteilung).

 

What was your impression of the Third Reich, and living through the war?

 

Ruckdeschel: That question could take days to answer. To sum it up for you, I grew up when Germany was ruled by a king. He was a good ruler that helped grow Germany into a world power. WW1 brought much hardship and misery to us, causing many to lose faith in what they were fighting for. In came the communist agitators, led by jews, who helped cause the downfall of this monarchy. The Weimar era was nothing but the jews in Germany having a heyday, getting friends into very high places, and bringing more and more jews from the east to take good jobs.

 

Ludwig Ruckdeschel

 

I saw such immorality while I was a student; young girls were forced to use their bodies in ways that brought shame to them. Sex was the watchword of the Weimar era, foreigners were coming to Germany (many from non-European lands) to feed upon our people for their perverse pleasure. I was even approached by several homosexual men, I was so angry to see this I started looking for solutions. Germany was in a state of decay that seemed to just keep getting worse. I grew up a christian and knew this was not what God or nature intended.

 

I saw a foreign people who settled in my country, now starting to take it over. There were cases of Germans being thrown out of businesses just so the new jewish owner could bring in more friends and family. Sadly, this was a common occurrence, as during the war, most jews stayed on the home front combining their money to buy businesses where the owners had gone to the front to fight.

 

German business’s now became the instrument of jewish power and influence, most ill gotten by preying on war widows and children who only saw the money and not the future of their nation being bought up. So basically Germany was becoming a country of slaves, who owed their existence to a foreign race, who was working to make money off of us, while slowly destroying us.

 

The average German was on their knees, humbling themselves and praying to the God of our fathers to save them from this degeneracy. That prayer was answered in the rise of one man, Adolf Hitler. Therefore, this started my career, as he took the reins of German politics.

 

I always knew things were not right with my nation, so I started to look for ways to help awaken my people from the sleep or spell they had been in. I joined right wing organizations, as they seemed to be along my same thinking. I saw for the first time how powerful the jews were, and they had only been in Germany for a few hundred years. Many organizations had jews in them, and while they pretended to be nationalistic, they seemed to work against the very idea from the inside. That is one small reason the Führer banned or incorporated many of the organizations into the NSDAP. I went to hear Hitler speak in Bayreuth and was immediately emboldened; now I knew what party to belong to.

 

Did you ever meet the Führer in person?

 

Ruckdeschel: Yes, many times. I spoke with him the very first night I heard him speak. There was not the usual leftist interruption’s that I had heard so much about. I thanked him for such an insightful talk about how to stop the decay of our nation and bring it back to God. He asked me what I did for a living. I told him I was a sales person, he laughed and said the party could use more sales people to get the word out. I accepted his offer and asked how I could help. I was introduced to some people who put me to work. That was my first meeting with the Führer, but was not my last, I saw him many times and I believe got to know him very well.

 

The Allies accused you and others of supporting a regime that murdered millions, attempted to take over the world, kill jews, and terrorize everyone. How do you respond to these claims?

 

Ruckdeschel: It’s rubbish, it is good to be the victor, you can make any rule you want, and tell any story you would like, and as long as you control what people learn, you control what people know. After the war things were very convoluted, many people were forced to say things that were not true, some people thought if they told the victors what they wanted to hear, all would be good, they could just go back to the way it used to be. I visited a few of our camps during the war, and can tell you with a good conscience nothing bad was happening in them. We are hearing more and more how jews and others were mistreated in the camps, that they were gassed, and burned alive. None of this is the truth.

 

12. SS Division Hitlerjugend receiving Iron Cross awards, 1944

 

The truth is Germany needed every able-bodied person to help with the war effort, even prisoners. I was present during meetings with Himmler, and if the plan were to kill jews, he would have brought it up. All I ever heard him mention was that the death tolls in the camps, due to dirty prisoners and sickness, had to be brought down with better medical staff and conditions. Does that sound like he was trying to kill people?

 

I witnessed very healthy jews, happily working in our camps. They had been told that they were being moved out of the Reich to the East, and they would be taken care of and reimbursed for lost property and possession’s once the war was over. Our goal was to get an alien people, who seemed to wage a secret war on our values and culture, to go back from where they came.

 

In one of our main camps, Auschwitz, there was a swimming pool, kindergarten, hospital, brothel, soccer field, and store. If people were to be killed, why go to the trouble to build all this? This camp was built around factories, and most all inmates worked in these factories, for pay. Never was it our intention to kill people, only to remove them from any position of influence over us. I will stand before my creator with a clean conscience that we did nothing wrong to these people. NS is a belief in peace, beauty, health, and honor; never would we have embarked to harm others. It was only due to unfortunate circumstances, caused by the Allies, that created the chaos at the very end that claimed so many lives in these camps due to no food or medicine.

 

When the war was over the allied interrogators, who were mostly jewish or German communists who left to serve the allied cause, beat me and threatened me with all sorts of torture. Being in the party leadership, I was expected to divulge all sorts of supposed secrets and intrigue. They wanted to know who was sleeping with who, who ordered what, and where could they find so and so. I had no answers for them and it is a wonder I was not taken out and shot, or turned over to the Russians. So in short, I do not believe that Germany committed any crimes, we acted quite correctly, and any excesses that may have occurred were only isolated and were not state policy.

 

12. SS Division Hitlerjugend insignia

 

What was it like being in the SS?

 

Ruckdeschel: You have to think of the SS as being a large, elite, bureaucratic organization. There was many branches, all with the aim of helping its members. I am one of the few political leaders to have served at the front and come under fire. I was a very early member of the SS, and joined at the request of RF Himmler, being made an officer due to my level of education. Being in the SS opened up many doors for me that took me to the Reichstag, political leadership, then a GL.

 

When war broke out, I was assigned to the Totenkopf div, then drafted into the Wehrmacht to assist their propaganda company, then sent to the LSSAH where I was placed in a front line combat unit, I was also able to help build the HJ Panzer div. I was badly wounded, losing this arm in combat. Due to this, I was again back on the home front; I was again made the GL of Bayreuth at the end of the war. Due to me being in the SS, I was labeled a war criminal, which was quite ironic as the Allies committed so many crimes against us, that if we would have won, we would have had our London, Moscow, and Washington war crimes tribunals.

 

12. SS Division Hitlerjugend

 

I am very proud of my service in the SS. I felt like this was a good way to find balance between life. It was a religious order, with a back to the ancestor’s idea, but with an eye toward a bright, hopeful future, full of life for our people and service to our creator. When I try to explain this to others, I get a blank stare that tells me our enemies have done well with their “re-education” programs. Himmler was one of the warmest and compassionate leaders I have met. The stories told about him today are far from the truth, and nothing but the victors trying to justify their war of aggression against us. They need to make it look like we were a threat to their people’s existence and actively working to destroy them, all of our leaders have been made into monsters serving absolute evil.

 

It is a good tactic to scare people from searching for answers as to what this was all about. We were the evil bad people, and the Allies were the brave saviors, that’s all the sheep need to hear. I have attended a few veterans’ meetings and am no longer appalled at the horror stories these men and their wives tell regarding treatment by these victors.

 

Who would you say was worse, the Soviets or western allies?

 

Ruckdeschel: In my mind, they were equally evil. The western allies, led by men like “bomber Harris” openly advocated, for the first time in modern war, plans to kill civilians through aerial bombings. Hundreds of thousands of civilians, all over Europe, were killed by allied bombs. The Allies started the war, started bombing cities first, targeted civilians first, and raped and looted their way through Western Europe destroying treasures that will never been seen again.

 

The Soviets perhaps were worse, where a jewish leader, Illya Ehrenburg, openly called for the rape and murder of German women, something many of his soldiers were happy to do. The Soviets were clearly ready to attack us in 1941 to wipe us out, we hit them before they could carry this out. From the outset, the Soviet soldier was cruel and devious. Killing wounded prisoners and even their own civilians.

 

Many of their commissar’s were jews, as communism owes its roots to jews like Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky. It was not uncommon for our soldiers to capture these monsters and shoot them out right after interrogation. They were pure evil, and a curse upon God’s earth. I should like to say, the Soviets claim that we killed 30 plus millions of their population, making it into another “holocaust” if you will.

 

12. SS Division Hitlerjugend

 

I was on the Russian front, fought the soviet soldier, and interacted with the Russian people. I can tell you with a clean conscience that we treated the population well. They did the same to us. Many a time did German doctor’s care for the needs of the Russian population. In addition, they hated the partisans, who were fanatical communists or jews more times than not, and preyed upon the civilian population as much as they did us.

 

Sadly, I believe, and have heard from people who escaped after the war, that the Soviets purged the civilian population of anyone who was even accused of being nice to Germans. They then blame these missing people on us as having been murdered or made slaves. As proof of our interaction with the Russians just look at a German soldier’s private photo album, you will no doubt see photos of happy, smiling, and friendly people being nice to our soldiers and vis versa.

 

Speaking of crimes, do you believe Germany did anything wrong? The vast majority of people believe Germany waged wars of aggression, killed innocents, committed all sorts of war crimes, and then brushed it off as if it never happened or was no big deal. Sorry to keep asking but this is why National Socialism has such a bad reputation.

 

Ruckdeschel: I really do hate when I have been asked this. Again, this question could take days to explain. I will try to be brief, as I need to eat and rest. I was placed in positions to where I was a witness to the war on most every front. I was a leader with ties to the military, armament’s, the home front, and close to the Führer himself. If Germany were guilty of any of these, I would have seen it, and heard about it. There were rumors passed by some, due to enemy radio propaganda that cast us as criminals, some in our General staff even believed this non-sense, and were too stupid to see it was part of the enemies’ grand strategy to justify a war that we did not want to fight. Stories were spread that we were killing jews, gypsies, homosexuals, priests, and prisoners.

 

I can’t say it enough, there was no policy to kill these people. We had to be firm, move them away from us, and punish them for crimes. The Allies had to make it seem like we were a threat to the world, so they have to fight us as hard as necessary no matter what the casualties. They claim we shot prisoners. On very few occasions, there might have been angry, battle shocked soldiers who did, however it was not policy. Civilians’ were sometimes hung due to sabotage or some other crimes, every nation has had to deal with these issues, and the outcome is the same. When we did it, it was a “crime”. We bombed cities, only because they were made front line fortresses and heavily defended.

 

In Warsaw our LW dropped warnings for the people to leave to avoid civilian casualties, which the Polish leadership refused to let people leave saying they needed them to help defend the capital. The French bombed our cites and invaded parts of our western border, destroying what they could in 1939. The English started the terror bombing well before we hit London in ’40 or any of their cities for that matter.

 

12. SS Division Hitlerjugend

 

Everything Germany did that seems “wrong” was in response to something our enemies did first. I was in the TK div and heard about the shooting of prisoners at Le Paradise, the details were sketchy, as the RF did not want to be bothered about British claims when they were clearly committing war crime after war crime against us.

 

British soldiers were accused of using the same tricks their fathers did in the first war, using bullets reversed so they caused more traumatic injuries in our soldiers. They shot and killed soldiers who were under a white flag of truce, and French civilians claimed to have been roughed up by allied soldiers as they waited for our arrival, a few being shot and killed. This is just one of hundreds of examples German soldiers found themselves in, which then caused a reaction. Our government got to the point of no longer lodging protests as they went nowhere, but let the British accuse us and we had to be front and center, often not believed. Such is the power of influence.

 

What was your impression of the Führer?

 

Ruckdeschel: I am proud to be called a National Socialist because of him. This movement he helped found will one day be the greatest blessing to this earth and all of its people. The world just does not know it yet. I may sound like an old, overzealous, and eccentric person, but I saw something in this belief that works. Hitler was one of the most kind, intelligent, and caring men I have ever met. On the outside, he always seemed focused and ready to face the fight, “historians” have called this an example of his evilness.

 

I saw his inside too; he always cared about us, our families, and made sure we had everything we needed. He cared for the poor, not just in Germany, but also in all of Europe. After the fall of Poland, one of his first acts was to set aside funds to start rebuilding Warsaw and other cities damaged. The same thing in France, a first act was to move in the Red Cross to help shelter and feed the French people. He authorized the release of some POWs to help their families, and asked for volunteers to go into these nations to help our brothers and sisters rebuild from a war forced on them by their ignorant leaders.

 

National Socialism started as a German movement, but in no way were we elitist about it; we wanted all of Europe to unite to help us secure a bright future for our whole continent. The anger from the nations we occupied is quite surprising to me. I know no one wants to have their country invaded, but we were fighting a war we didn’t ask for. We treated them very well, and I can only think that it was the Allies who drummed up all the anti-German sentiment, and human nature is to be glad an occupier is gone, even if he was good to you. Communists and others opposed to us politically really whipped up the civilians after the war to make it seem like we oppressed them all. They built up such hatred, that what was done to those young girls who’s only “crime” was having a German boyfriend is a stain on the honor of their nation. I saw on TV where some were even killed. All because of blind hate.

 

I am sorry I get carried away while talking about this, not too many people ask these questions where I am free to give an honest response. In today’s “democracies” telling the truth will get you in trouble with the government, with all the freedom they are trying to protect. 

 

 

Even at the very end, Hitler was concerned with his people. The deaths were very hard on him; he could not bring himself to see the devastation. He lamented once he felt responsible for all this since it was our attack on Poland that started things in motion. He was second guessing himself, but I think he knew the Allies wanted war and they used Poland as the means to that end. Poland was refusing to do anything about the border incursions, attacks on Germans, and made it clear they wanted to fight us to take more land. Our attack against them, which the whole Reichstag supported after being presented with the evidence, was more to protect Germany and our borders more than anything else. Even reclaiming our land stolen by Versailles was a secondary reason.

 

Hitler loved all of nature, he wouldn’t hurt a fly. He loved all animals and often liked to send us on zoo trips and to wildlife parks. He wanted to reverse some of the ravages left from the first war to our forests and set the HJ and BDM to work planting trees all over the Reich. Swamps were cleaned up, waterways made safer for wildlife and man. Health was put at the forefront of everyone’s goals. A healthy people are a happy people he always said.

 

Women were encouraged to not smoke, drinking heavily was frowned upon. Sex was turned back into something healthy that men and women in love engaged in. A woman’s body was a holy temple to be given to her mate, not a tool of jewish degeneracy. Women, for the first time were encouraged to be anything they wanted to be, with the most honorable choice being a mother to the future of our people. The Führer was loved because of this wholesomeness he brought. He was one of us, and never let us forget we are servants of our people, not lords over them.

 

What was it like being a Gauleiter?

 

Ruckdeschel: It was hard work, really. Being a GL is like being a governor in the states. I was responsible for my gau, or state. I had to deal with things like infrastructure, business, education, and anything internal with my subordinates. Laws had to be enforced, and sometimes I had to step in to act as judge. There were very many personalities to deal with, some good, some bad, but we had to make it work for the benefit of our people.

 

The war brought many hardships and derailed many of the plans we had, I saw people helping each other like never before, that helped Germany rebuild even after all we had been through. With that, my friend, I must end this, as I am tired. I hope I have given you some insight into life back then that you will take this knowledge and help make a brighter future for this world.

 

 

12. SS Division Hitlerjugend

Sunday, October 27, 2024

The Talmud - Part II

Part II


M. H.DE HEEKELINGEN, in Israel: Son Passe, Son Avenir: „The former Rabbi Drach, converted to Catholicism, says that the Talmud contains „a large number of musing, utterly ridiculous extravagancies, most revolting indecencies, and, above all, the most horrible blasphemies against everything which the Christian religion holds most sacred and most dear.“


„In the matter of the translation of the Talmud by non-Jews, we have always preferred that of Luzsensky, whose accuracy has been established by the Courts. In 1923, the Public Prosecutor of Hungary caused his Hungarian Talmud to be seized on account of „attack on public morals“ and „pornography.“ In delivering its verdict, the Court declared ‘INTER ALIA:’


„The horrors contained in the translation of Alfred Luzsensky are to be found, without exception, in the Talmud. His translation is correct, in that it renders these passages, which are actually to be found in the original text of the Talmud, after their true meaning.“


The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia states that „The Talmud is the real „bible“ of the Jews and that it supersedes the Old Testament. This volume has been condemned down through the ages for preaching hatred for Christ and all Christians. Read „THE TALMUD UNMASKED“ for the full shocking details.


NESTA WEBSTER, in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, page 370: „The Jewish conception of the Jews as the Chosen People who must eventually rule the world forms indeed the basis of Rabbinical Judaism... The Jewish religion now takes its stand on the Talmud rather than on the Bible.“


F. TROCASE, in Jewish Austria: „No obstacle discourages them; they persevere throughout the world, throughout the centuries, the unity of their race. The Talmud has given them a powerful organization which modern progress has been unable to change. Deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not Jewish stimulates them in war which they wage against Christian Society, which is too divided to be able to fight with the necessary energy.“


GREGORY IX. Condemned the TALMUD as containing „every kind of vileness and blasphemy against Christian doctrine.“


BENEDICT XIII. His Bull on the Jewish issue (1450) declared: „The heresies, vanities and errors of the TALMUD prevent their knowing the truth.“


JULIUS III. Contra Hebreos retinentes libros (1554) ordered the TALMUD burned „everywhere“ and established a strict censorship over Jewish genocidal writings - an order that has never been rescinded and which presumably is still binding upon Catholics.


SOMBART, WERNER. 20th century German economist: „Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the TALMUD and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords of Money and Lords of the World...

Thursday, October 24, 2024

Jared Kushner: A Corrupt Jewish Kleptocrat

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jared-kushner-a-corrupt-jewish-kleptocrat/

 

by Karl Radl

 

After I had originally finished my article ‘Jared Kushner: An Unelected Jewish Dictator’ a piece was published by the New York Times, which argued that Kushner was likely corrupt and engaged in shady business deals with Israel’s billionaire Steinmetz family. (1)

 

The article – which likely had to pass through a lot of fact checking and given several green lights for fear of legal repercussions from the Kushner and Steinmetz families – makes the circumstantial case that Kushner is linked to Beny Steinmetz’s ongoing woes over alleged corruption surrounding mining contracts in Guinea via Steinmetz’s nephew Raz.

 

The New York Times is careful to not make positive claims, but rather imply corruption and talk about ‘potential’ conflicts of interests for Jared Kushner and his unofficial role as the unelected dictator of the United States.

 

The argument made is simply this:

 

In 2012 Jared Kushner’s ‘Kushner Companies’ went on a $190 million spending spree buying up a large number of apartment buildings in Lower Manhattan. For the $50 million in deposits required to do this; Kushner turned to an overseas partner who wished to remain anonymous, but who turns out to have been Raz Steinmetz.

 

Raz Steinmetz was revealed by the famous Panama Papers leak to have access to his uncle Beny’s bank accounts and vice versa. Therefore – despite claims that this is ‘no longer the case’ by the Steinmetz family – it is possible (and dare I say likely) that Kushner was somewhat involved with Beny Steinmetz – who is the patriarch as far as business is concerned of the Steinmetz family – with Raz as merely the chosen representative.

 

Thus, Kushner may have been aware or benefited from the alleged corruption dealings of Beny Steinmetz in Guinea, which – as the Trump administration was supervising the investigation into Steinmetz’s dealings at the time – placed Kushner in a serious conflict of interest.

 

As it happens – as James North acerbically noted – Steinmetz’s lawyer Alan Dershowitz implied that the charges against his client are going to get thrown out soon but I cannot find any record of this beyond the initial media reports suggesting he may have been successfull. (2)

 

Perhaps it was just typical Dershowitz huff and puff, but the frightening fact is that it could very well be far more; Kushner interfering in the case to protect his one-time business partner from public embarrassment.

 

Obviously, we don’t and likely won’t even know for sure if this happened, but even the possibility looms ominously like a sword of Damocles for the domestic and international credibility of Donald Trump then as now.

 

It also didn’t (and doesn’t) bode well for the public finances if a man who may have engaged in corruption – and whose family has significant previous form for engaging in corruption-related activities – (3) has the power and influence to potentially abuse them at will.

 

It also suggests that Kushner was unfit to broker any kind of peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians, because – while he withdrew from management of ‘Kushner Companies’. He was still a named direct beneficiary of the firm and therefore has a significant source of motivation to support Israel – besides his own militant jewishness – because that is the base of the fortunes of the Steinmetz family – which necessarily affect his own through the Steinmetz stake in ‘Kushner Companies’ – rather than doing what was in America’s interests.

 

The issue of whether Beny Steinmetz engaged in corruption is more difficult, because while Frederic Cilins – who was the representative of Steinmetz’s BSG Resources in Guinea – was almost certainly guilty of engaging in bribery. (4)

 

There is no direct evidence that Steinmetz knew of or condoned Cilins’ actions, but yet it is difficult to imagine that Steinmetz wasn’t at least aware of what was going because of the noise – then as now – around corporate corruption as well as because Cilins wouldn’t have been likely to engage in such behaviour without at least tacit approval from the highest levels of management at BSG Resources.

 

So while we cannot say for sure whether Jared Kushner or Beny Steinmetz engaged in or benefited from corruption. It seems clear that there is a decent circumstantial case for thinking this might indeed have been the case.

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies. This post is public so feel free to share it.


References

 

(1) https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/us/politics/jared-kushner-beny-steinmetz.html?_r=1

 

(2) http://mondoweiss.net/2017/04/financial-partners-steinmetz/

 

(3) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/jared-kushner-convict-fraud-father-charles-new-york-property-empire-president-donald-trump-adviser-a7552496.html

 

(4) https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/us/politics/jared-kushner-beny-steinmetz.html?_r=1; https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/dec/19/israeli-tycoon-beny-steinmetz-arrested-over-guinea-bribery-claims; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/01/04/bsg-resources-beny-steinmetz-released-without-charge-guinea/

 

via Karl Radl’s Substack