Saturday, February 27, 2021

Jews and Non-Jews

„Years of observation and thought have given increasing strength to the belief that we Jews stand apart from you gentiles, that a primal duality breaks the humanity I know into two distinct parts; that this duality is a fundamental, and that all differences among you gentiles are trivialities compared with that which divided all of you from us.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 12)

„You may even have Jews in your midst who did not learn their way of life from us, and did not inherit it from a Jewish forebear. We may have authentic gentiles in our midst: these single protests are of no account; they are extreme and irrelevant variations.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 21).

„I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 23).

„You have your way of life, we ours. In your system of life we are essentially without ‘honor.’ In our system of life you are essentially without morality. In your system of life we must forever appear graceless; to us you must forever appear godless.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 34).

„According to Jewish belief, the Jewish People constitutes a species of their its own...i.e., a special, separate act of Creation by the Almighty. ‘The thought of creating the Jewish People preceded every other thought’ of the Almighty when creating the Universe according to the teaching of Rabbi Samuel bar Isaac.“ (Bereshith Rabba 1,5)

„When Germany and England and America will long have lost their present identity or purpose, we shall still be strong in ours.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 111).

„Judaism, which was destroyed politically (as a result of the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D.), went forth into the great world. It adapted its possessions to its wanderings. I once compared it to an army going to war, a ‘movable State.’

Jews were compelled to smuggle their goods across from frontier to frontier; so they chose abstract wares, easy to stubble; and this gave them ability, despite ghettos and restrictions, to enter everywhere; and so it is that the Hebrew people have penetrated everywhere.

The argument is that Judaism, by penetrating among the Gentiles (IN CHRISTIANS GUISE or otherwise), has gradually undermined the remnants of paganism. Such penetration has not been without deliberate Jewish conniving in the shape of assistance bestowed in a thousand ways, devices and disguises. It has been affected in great measure by crypto-Jews, who have permeated Christianity and spoken through the mouth of Christianity.

By these devices of their Jewish blood; and owing to an instance for ‘requital,’ they have gradually induced Christianity to accept what was left in it of pagan elements as their own; and it is they who, in principle (even though they are called by great Gentile names), of Democracy, of Socialism, and of Communism. All this achievement...has come about chiefly through unknown anonymous Jews, Jews in secret, either crypto-Jews who mingled among the Gentiles and nurtured great thinkers from among them; or, through the influence of Jews, who, in the great crises of liberty and freedom, have stood behind the scenes; or through Jewish teachers and scholars from the time of the Middle Ages.

It was disciples of Jewish teachers who headed the Protestant movements. These dogs, these haters of the Jews have a keen nose. In truth, Jewish influence in Germany is powerful. It is impossible to ignore it. Marx was a Jew. His manner of thought was Jewish. His keenness of intellect was Jewish; and one of his forebears was a most distinguished rabbi endowed with a powerful mind. The newspapers, under Jewish control, obviously served as an auxiliary in all movements in favor of freedom. Not in vain have Jews been drawn toward journalism. In their hands it became a weapon highly fitted to meet their needs...

The Gentiles have at last realized this secret, that Judaism has gradually penetrated them like a drug. The Gentile nature is in revolt, and is trying to organize the final battle. Christianity is trying to organize its last war against Judaism. And there is no doubt that this being waged specifically against Democracy, against Socialism. This is another world wide warfare again against the forces of Judaism. I venture to think that Socialism in its highest form is the fruit of the Jewish spirit, and the fruit of the world outlook of the prophets. It is they who were the first Socialists.

War is now being waged against us {but unknown to most of Christianity. Because God’s People refuse to accept knowledge and recognize the enemy}, against Judaism, not in our own land, but in the great outer world where we are scattered. They would ‘smoke us out’ of all the cracks and crannies where we have hidden. They would exterminate us like bacilli, and be rid of us.“ (N.H. Bialik, in an address delivered at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, May 11, 1933, which appeared in Lines of Communication, Palestine, July, 1933)

„The Western mind is incapable of thinking religiously.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, a Jew, p. 185).

„The Universal Israelite Alliance...addresses itself to every type of worship. It wishes to penetrate all religions, as it has found access to all countries...Let all men of enlightenment, without distinction of sec, find a means of union in the Universal Israelite Association, whose aims are so noble, so broad, and so highly civilizing...To reach out a friendly hand to all who, although born in a different worship from ours, offer us the hand of fellowship, acknowledging that all religions which are based on morality and acknowledge God ought to be friendly towards one another: thus to destroy the barriers separating what is destined one day to be united, that is the grand supreme object of our Alliance...I summon to our Association our brethren of every form of worship. Let them come to us...Our grand mission is to put the Jewish population in touch with the authorities in every make our voices heard in the cabinets of ministers and in the ears of princes, whatever be the religion that is despised, persecuted, or attacked.“ (Archives Israelites Universelle, tom. xxv, pp. 511-520 (1861). Quoted in Rev. S.J. Deschamps, Les Sociétés Secrètes et la Société, p. 24).

„For fifty years I have been a resolute partisan of assimilation of the Jews, and have believed in it. Today I confess my error. The American melting-pot will never produce the fusion of one Jew. Fifty years ago we were near to assimilating ourselves to the Americans. But since then two millions of our brother (or three) have arrived from the East, keeping their ancient traditions, bringing with them their old ideal. This army has submerged us. It is the hand of God. The Jew must differentiate himself from his neighbor; he must know it; he must be conscious of it; he must be proud of it.“ (The Jewish Chronicle, April 28, 1911, M. Schindler, an American Rabbi).

„We are hostile to strangers, guests in all countries, and at the same time we find ourselves at home in all countries when we are masters there.“ (Isaac Blumchen, Le Droit de la Race Supérieure).

„I do not intend,“ declares Herzl, „to provoke a softening of opinion in our favor. It would be idle, and would lack dignity. I am content to ask the Jews if, in the countries where we are numerous, it is true that the position of advocates, doctors, engineers, professors, and employees of all kinds, belonging to our race (people), is becoming more and more intolerable.“ (Le Droit de la Race Supérieure, Isaac Blumehen).

„[The Jews] fill in proportion, thanks to their insistence, more posts than the other communities, Catholic and Protestant. Their disastrous influence makes itself felt above all in affairs which have most weight in the fortune of the country; there is no enterprise in which the Jews have not their large share, no public loan which they do not monopolize, no disaster which they have not prepared and by which they do not profit. It is therefore, ill-considered to complain, as they always do, they who have all the favors and who make all the profits!“ (Les Juifs (1847), Cerfberr de Medelsheim; also quoted by Gougenot des Mousseaux in Le Juif, (1869).

„More than ever the study of the Jewish problem is a pressing reality, but...the Jewish question is also more than ever ‘taboo’; one must not speak of it, still less study it. At most the right to deny its existence is recognized. Those even who should be most interested in finding a solution pretend to solve the problem by abstention or silence which is considered both a sane method and a high humanitarian idea...Judaism in its origins and expansions presents an ensemble of sentiments, notions, and ideas which are the source of veritable systems, religious, political and social; one has the right to discuss and contest these systems.“ (Le Problème Juic, (1921), Georges Batault).

„The dispersion of the Jews has rendered them a cosmopolitan people. They are the only cosmopolitan people, and in this capacity must act, and are acting, as a solvent of national and racial differences. The great Ideal of Judaism is not that Jews shall be allowed to flock together one day in some hole-and-corner fashion, for, if not tribal, at any rate separatist objects; but that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a Universal Brotherhood of Nations, a great Judaism, in fact, all the separate races and religions shall disappear...The new Constitution of the [Jewish] Board of Deputies marks an epoch in the history of that important institution...The real importance of the new Constitution is...that it provides a machinery for enabling the Jews of England to work together when the occasion requires, that in short it organizes the Jews of the whole Empire, and renders their aggregate force available in cases of emergency.“ (Jewish World, February 9 and 16, 1883).

„...We aspire to corrupt in order to attain to govern...We have corrupted too much...I begin to fear that we will not be able to stem the torrent we have let loose. There are insatiable passions of which I did not guess, unknown appetites, savage hatreds which ferment around and under us...It has been very easy to pervert; will it also always be easy to muzzle the perverts?...I am disturbed, for I am getting old, I have lost my illusions, I do not wish, poor and deluded of everything to assist as a theatrical supernumerary in the triumph which I have created and which would repudiate me by confiscating my fortune and taking off my head. We have gone too much to the extreme in many things. We have taken from the people all the gods of heaven and earth which had their homage. We have torn from them their religious faith, their faith in monarchy, their honesty and their family virtues, and we hear in the distance their sinister roarings. We tremble, for the monster may devour us...The world is cinched on the declivity of democracy, and for some time for me democracy has meant demagogy.

 „It is true that there is a distinct ‘Jewish idea’ in business and professional life which has eaten away the traditional principles of honor on which Anglo-Saxon life was erected. Every Jew knows that, every non-Jew knows it...It is true that beneath all the network of trivializing influences in literature, art, politics, economics, fashion, and sports, is Jewish influence controlled by Jewish groups. Their Orientalism has served as a subtle poison to dry up the sound serum of Anglo-Saxon morality on which this country thrived in its formative years.“ (The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem, Vol. IV, pp. 224-225).

„...the original mixed ancestry of the Jews and their subsequent history of intermixture with every people among whom they have lived and continue to live...“ (Ashley Montagu, Man’s Most Dangerous Myth, (1974) , p. 375).

„The word ‘ghetto’ is synonymous with the Jews: ‘ghetto, section of a city in which Jews lived. In the early Middle Ages their segregation in separate streets or localities was voluntary...The reason generally given for compulsory ghettos was that the faith of Christians would be weakened by the presence of Jews. Within the ghetto the inhabitants were usually autonomous, with their own courts of law and their own culture.“ (The Columbia Encyclopedia, 2nd Ed., (1950), p. 772).

„London became after Waterloo the money market and the clearing house of the world ...Every new economic enterprise of the British state appealed to the Jewish genius for commerce and especially for negotiation in its most abstract form - finance...The two things dovetailed one into the other and fitted exactly, and all subsidiary activities fitted in as well. The Jewish news agencies of the nineteenth century favored England in all her policy, political as well as commercial; they opposed those of her rivals and especially of her enemies. The Jewish knowledge of the East was at the service of England (Opium Wars, Indian Conquest). His international penetration of the European governments was also at her service, so was his secret information...The Jew might almost be called a British agent upon the Continent of Europe and still more in the Near and Far East...He was admitted to every institution in the State, a prominent member of his nation became chief officer of the English executive, and, an influence more subtle and penetrating, marriages began to take place, wholesale, between what had once been the aristocratic territorial families of this country and the Jewish commercial fortunes. After two generations of this, with the opening of the twentieth century those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception. In nearly all of them was the stain more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English name and the tradition those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family were taken for Jews whenever they travelled in countries where the gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed the admixture.“ (Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, pp. 222-223)

„There are two life-forces in the world I know: Jewish and gentile (non-Jewish), ours and yours...I do not believe that this primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York, 1924, pp. 19, 23).

„...don’t kill the farmer, he’s too valuable to us.“ (Jewish Motto).

„We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.“ (Goldwin Smith, Jewish Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, October, 1981)

„We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.“ (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

„But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim.“ (Statement reported in a French Newspaper in 1773 after a meeting in the Rothschild home).

In an article by the Jew Victor Berger, one of the national leaders of the Socialist Party, wrote, in the Social Democratic Herald: „There can be no doubt that the Negroes and Mulattos constitute a lower race.“

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels said Blacks: „...were people who ought to be eradicated and swept from the earth.“ (Karl Marx, by Nathaniel Weyl).

„Jews may adopt the customs and language of the countries where they live; but they will never become part of the native population.“ (The Jewish Courier, January 17, 1924).

„We are neither German, English or French. We are Jews and your Christian mentality is not ours.“ (Max Nordrow, a German Zionist Leader, in The Jewish World)

„The chief difficulty in writing about the Jewish Question is the super-sensitiveness of Jews and non-Jews concerning the whole matter. There is a vague feeling that even to openly use the word ‘Jew,’ or expose it nakedly to print is somehow improper. Polite evasions like ‘Hebrew’ and ‘Semite,’ both of which are subject to the criticism of inaccuracy, are timidly essayed, and people pick their way gingerly as if the whole subject were forbidden, until some courageous Jewish thinker comes straight out with the old old word ‘Jew,’ and then the constraint is relieved and the air cleared...A Jew is a Jew and as long as he remains within his perfectly unassailable traditions, he will remain a Jew. And he will always have the right to feel that to be a Jew, is to belong to a superior race. No one knows better than the Jew how widespread the notion that Jewish methods of business are all unscrupulous. No existing Gentile system of government is ever anything but distasteful to him. The Jew is against the Gentile scheme of things.

He is, when he gives his tendencies full sway, a Republican as against the monarchy, a Socialist as against the republic, and a Bolshevik as against Socialism. Democracy is all right for the rest of the world, but the Jew wherever he is found forms an aristocracy of one sort or another.“ (Henry Ford, Dearborn Independent)

„We are interested in just the the diminution, the killing out of the Goyim.“ (Reportedly spoken by a Jewish speaker in the Rothschild home in 1773)

„We intend to remake the Gentiles -- what the Communists are doing in Russia.“ (Rabbi Lewish Brown in How Odd of God, New York, 1924)

„Let us recognize that we Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, or shade of belief, is necessarily a member. Organize, organize, until every Jew must stand up and be counted with us, or prove himself wittingly or unwittingly, of the few who are against their own people.“ (Louis B. Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1916-1939)

„I would willingly disenfranchise every Zionist. I would almost be tempted to proscribe the Zionist organizations as illegal and against the national interests...I have always recognized the unpopularity, much greater than some people think of my community. We [Jews] have obtained a far greater share of this country’s [England] goods and opportunities than we are numerically entitled to. We reach, on the whole, maturity earlier, and therefore with people of our own age we compete unfairly. Many of us have been exclusive in our friendships, and intolerable in our attitude, and I can easily understand that many a non-Jew in England wants to get rid of us.“ (Jewish-American Ambassador to India, Edwin Montague, The Zionist Connection, p. 737)

„You cannot be English Jews. We are a race, and only as a race can we perpetuate. Our mentality is of Edomitish character, and differs from that of an Englishman. Enough subterfuges! Let us assert openly that we are International Jews.“ (From the manifesto of the „World Jewish Federation,“ January 1, 1935, through its spokesperson, Gerald Soman).

„No one pretends that a Japanese or Indian child is English because it was born in England. The same applies to Jews.“ (Jewish World, London September 22, 1915)

„A Jew remains a Jew. Assimilalation is impossible, because a Jew cannot change his national character. Whatever he does, he is a Jew and remains a Jew. The majority has discovered this fact, but too late. Jews and Gentiles discover that there is no issue. Both believed there was an issue. There is none.“ (The Jews, Ludwig Lewisohn, in his book „Israel,“ 1926)

„When some Jews say that they consider themselves as a religious sect, like Roman Catholics or Protestants, they do not analyze correctly their own attitude and sentiments...Even if a Jew is baptized or, that which is not necessarily the same thing, sincerely converted to Christianity, it is rare if he is not still regarded as a Jew; his blood, his temperament and his spiritual particularities remain unchanged.“ (The Jew and the Nation, Ad. Lewis, the Zionist Association of West London; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 187)

„An energetic, lively and extremely haughty people, considering itself superior to all other nations, the Jewish race wished to be a Power. It had an instinctive taste for domination, since, by its origin, by its religion, by its quality of a chosen people which it had always attributed to itself [since the Babylonian Captivity], it believed itself placed above all others. To exercise this sort of authority the Jews had not a choice of means, gold gave them a power which all political and religious laws refuse them, and it was the only power which they could hope for. By holding this gold they became the masters of their masters, they dominated them and this was the only way of finding an outlet for their energy and their activity...The emancipated Jews entered into the nations as strangers...They entered into modern societies not as guests but as conquerors. They had been like a fenced-in herd. Suddenly the barriers fell and they rushed into the field which was opened to them. But they were not warriors...They made the only conquest for which they were armed, that economic conquest for which they had been preparing themselves for so many years...The Jew is the living testimony to the disappearance of the state which had as its basis theological principles, a State which anti-Semitic Christians dream of reconstructing. The day when a Jew occupied an administrative post the Christian State was in danger: that is true and the anti-smites who say that the Jew has destroyed the idea of the state could more justly say that the entry of Jews into society has symbolized the destruction of the state, that is to say the Christian State.“ (Bernard Lazare, L’Antisémitisme, pp. 223, 361; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 221-222)

„The most important and pregnant tenet of modern Jewish belief is that the Ger {goy - goyim}, or stranger, in fact all those who do not belong to their religion, are brute beasts, having no more rights than the fauna of the field.“ (Sir Richard Burton, The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam, p. 73)

„Jew and Gentile are two worlds, between you Gentiles and us Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf...There are two life forces in the world Jewish and Gentile...I do not believe that this primal difference between Gentile and Jew is reconcilable...The difference between us is abysmal...You might say: ‘Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.’ But the misfortune is that the two are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, pages 2, 19, 23, 30 and 95)

„The Jewish people, Rabbi Judah Halevy (the famous medieval poet and philosopher) explains in his ‘Kuzari,’ constitutes a separate entity, a species unique in Creation, differing from nations in the same manner as man differs from the beast or the beast from the plant...although Jews are physically similar to all other men, yet they are endowed [sic] with a ‘second soul’ that renders them a separate species.“ (Zimmer, Uriel, Torah- Judaism and the State of Israel, Congregation Kehillath Yaakov, Inc., NY, 5732 (1972), p. 12)

Actually it seems to serve their twisted purpose! The basis of this belief is All non Jews are subhuman and are to be exploited (milked or beeved). When these folks get Irate and try to fight back they naturally see the enemy as being all „Jews“ and not merely their Corrupt leaders.. Thus these leaders would use IaHUeH’s people as a shield to further their wicked ends. When attacked, the people tend to stick closer together.. According to what they are told to believe for a non-jew to confront a Jew is like Blasphemy... this makes it harder to Isolate the very Serious problem! It turns into a vicious cycle of destruction. And has caused the unnecessary Suffering and Death to Millions upon Millions of People...all for the benefit of a few.

It seems that the only effective Solution must come from the „Jewish“ people themselves.. but they still aren’t listening.. because they are told that whenever someone even so much as mentions „Multi-national Banker“ that it is because that person is an anti-semite and wants to Murder all „Jews“ everywhere! I wonder how many millions of dollars have been spent by the ADL to keep people from talking bad about these „Multi-National (Power hungry, moneygrabbing, slimball, Lying, Thieving, Murderous, Sons of Belial) Bankers“!!!


ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937:There is nothing else in Communism - a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a „paradise on earth.“

Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and what it means. It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is - a Jewish scheme invented by Jews - that it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string-puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews.“

The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht ...(„not wanted.“) „I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish...“

„The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability.“ (Minority Report: H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks)

Wednesday, February 24, 2021

David Duke: Racial Realities Forbidden to the Goyim; Goldman Sachs Criminal Banksters


Dr. Duke was joined by Patrick Slattery for a discussion of the reality of race. Then they discussed the malfeasance of the criminal bankster organization Goldman Sachs.

Saturday, February 20, 2021

Storm, Break Loose!

by Dr. William Pierce

American Dissident Voices broadcast of April 8, 2000


Let’s talk more today about a question that listeners have raised repeatedly: What can I do for my people? What can I do to fight my people’s enemies?


If you’ve been listening to these American Dissident Voices programs for a while, you know that more than anything else I have urged people to stop being spectators and become participants in the historical process. If you don’t like what’s being done to our society, to our world, then get off the sidelines and get out on the field. Don’t just sit there and complain quietly to your friends. Do something!


The fact that not as many people as I would like have responded to this urging is not entirely due to cowardice or laziness. Most Americans are very much constrained by their need to earn a living. Relatively few have complete freedom of action. If they are to join the fight they need specific and practical suggestions about what they can do – and still earn a living. So today I want to make one or two such suggestions.


First, I want to warn everyone as strongly as possible: whatever you do, be certain that it is legal. There is very little in the way of illegal activity that is likely to be productive at this time anyway. Believe me, I understand the frustration, especially in our young men, when we see what’s happening around us and feel an almost irresistible urge to strike back. But for now, let’s stay away from the bombs and machine guns. There’s much else that must be done first. We don’t need those things quite yet. Conditions are not such that we can use those weapons effectively, so let’s just forget about them for the time being. If you want to collect weapons or to practice   with weapons, keep your weapons legal. There are plenty of legal things that can be done now that are effective, and very few illegal things. And when we make a decision about what to do, it should be based on considerations of effectiveness, not on how big a splash it’ll make on the evening news.


As I said a moment ago, the biggest constraint on most of our people is their need to earn a living. Anyone who is employed by a company that is determined to stay on the good side of the government and the media is in an especially delicate position. Even those of our people who are in business for themselves often are dependent on good relations with the public and can be driven into bankruptcy if attacked by the media. The first thing for every person to do is make a realistic evaluation of his situation. If you’re a policeman or an employee of a big insurance company, then there may be a concerted effort to have you fired if you say or do anything Politically Incorrect. You may get the John Rocker treatment by the media.


Of course, you may have the law on your side. You may be able to sue your employer if he tries to fire you. The way the judicial system works in this country, however, that may be a frustrating and disappointing endeavor. It is set up to favor the litigant who has the most money to spend on lawyers, not the litigant who’s in the right. You may want to go ahead and sue anyway, but most people would prefer not to be obliged to take that course.


So, the thing to do is either arrange to have an income that can’t be threatened by the self- appointed guardians of Political Correctness, in which case you can do whatever you want to do, or you can remain under the thumb of the system and act with circumspection. But regardless of which choice you make, the important thing is to act.


I’ve been looking for ways to facilitate the first choice: giving people who want to be activists an opportunity to do so by making it possible for them to support themselves independently of the system. Here’s a specific example: I recently bought a couple of record companies that specialize in what is known as „resistance music.“ That’s music that has a pro-White or pro-European- American message – or an anti-system message. It’s been essentially „underground“ music for a long time, composed and performed and distributed by amateurs on a part-time basis. The Jewish media bosses would like to keep it that way, but my aim is to professionalize it and mainstream it. I want to distribute enough of it so that the people who compose it and perform it can become professionals, can actually make a living at it. I believe that there’s a huge, untapped market for resistance music. Most Americans have never heard any resistance music. They’ve heard it denounced as „hate music“ by the Jewish media, but they’ve not actually heard it performed. I believe that many White Americans will like it when they hear it. If you’d like to hear some of it yourself, go to my web site at


Anyway, if I’m successful in mainstreaming resistance music, it has the potential for becoming a substantial industry employing at least a few thousand people. And that’s just one example of what I have in mind. As discontent with the government in America grows, as discontent with uncontrolled immigration and other government policies grows, as discontent with the bias and lies of the controlled media grows, there will be many other opportunities for new industries that are independent of the system. And if these new industries have a policy of employing people who are willing to be activists in the cause of freeing America and preserving the future of White Americans, they can open up possibilities for many other people. And I hardly need to tell you, I’m not the only one who can do this sort of thing. In fact, I’ve never thought of myself as a businessman or an entrepreneur. If I can do it, anybody can do it. A lot of you ought to be thinking along these lines. If you believe that you were cut out to be an entrepreneur, then be an entrepreneur for a worthwhile cause, and help free others to do what they ought to do.


That’s one side of the coin. The other side – and at this time it’s the more important side – is what you can do, with circumspection, right where you are. And let me tell you, there’s no one, and I mean, no one, who can’t take some effective action on behalf of our people, no matter how sensitive his position. I don’t care whether you work inside the White House with a Top Secret security clearance, or you’re on the staff of the rottenest politician in the Congress, or even if you’re the token Gentile in some Jewish law firm: if you’re really concerned about your people, about your race, you can take effective action without your family ending up starving on the street. All you really need, in addition to average intelligence and an average amount of initiative, is to have your priorities right – to understand that there is nothing more important than the future of our people, nothing – and to feel a sense of personal responsibility for what is happening to our world, to our civilization, to our race.


Now a few specific suggestions: I believe that the most important thing for responsible people to do is to speak out, to stop being silent. Many of our people are afraid that if they let it be known what they are thinking, their lives will be ruined. In most cases that isn’t true. What each of us must do is evaluate his own situation realistically, to think about only the real dangers and not the imaginary dangers, and then to speak out just as strongly as he can in his circumstances. In order to survive it is not necessary, in most cases, to persuade everyone around us that we are Politically Correct. We can say things that are not Politically Correct and still survive. We always should use good judgment, of course, and consider the effect of our words on others. But when we believe that we are right, we must not let ourselves be intimidated into silence. It is our responsibility to push the envelope, to take a chance on saying too much rather than saying too little.


And taking a chance does not mean talking just to your personal friends who already agree with you. It does not mean raging anonymously in some Internet discussion group. It means standing up and saying to the public: „This is my name. This is what I believe.“


I’ll read you a letter that was published just a few days ago in the Russellville, Arkansas, Courier, the local newspaper there. The writer of the letter, Billy Roper, is a personal friend of mine and a member of my organization, the National Alliance. He also is a high school history teacher in Russellville. He wrote his letter in response to an editorial by the typically liberal editor of the newspaper. The liberal editor had criticized Atlanta Braves pitcher John Rocker for expressing his distaste for the „diversity“ of New York City. In response Billy Roper wrote:


In his editorial of March 4, the editor writes that John Rocker should read Jewess Emma Lazarus’ paean to the colonization of America by the Third World: ‘send me your tired, your poor, your wretched refuse’ yearning for their first welfare check. In reality the United States was founded by White men for the express purpose of securing the blessings of liberty for themselves and their offspring, not the offspring of Africa or Asia or Mexico. What Mr. Rocker failed to realize but the editor clearly illustrates is that Whites are not allowed to criticize the new multicultural wonderland of diversity so long as Ms. Lazarus’ tribe dominates the mass media and government of this country. Instead, Whites are ordered to be tolerant of the fact that, as President Clinton bragged in his recent State of the Union address, we will be a minority in this country within a generation.


The country is being turned over to those who never could have created it. Is an America which is more like Mexico or Ethiopia a better America? Is an America where those who created this country have become a minority a worthy destiny? Is John Rocker the only American who is upset by the fact that the United States is becoming just another Third World cesspool?


Not by a long shot. We have enough tired and enough poor and enough wretched refuse already. It’s time to tear down Emma Lazarus’ sign and put up a fence instead.


Well, that was my friend Billy Roper’s letter, which was printed in the Russellville Courier last month. He could have said a lot more, of course. He could have expressed himself much more strongly. But in view of the very general, mainstream, brainwashed nature of his audience, he chose his words pretty well – well enough, anyway, to provide encouragement to many other White men and women who believe as we do but who have been too timid to speak out. The editor of the Russellville Courier hated him for it, of course, and responded to Billy’s letter with a snide remark. All of the other liberals who read the Courier also hated him for expressing himself as he did. These days a man cannot act honorably and responsibly without being hated for it. Any man who is not hated is a shirker; he’s not doing what he should be doing.


Anyway, the important thing is that my friend Billy Roper expressed himself – he spoke out – and he’s still a high school history teacher, still earning a living. The people who would like to see Billy unemployed, who would like to see him fired from his teaching position, are themselves afraid of exposing their beliefs to the public. What they believe is that anyone who is Politically Incorrect should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve.


They are intolerant, narrow-minded, bigoted, vicious, hateful people. And they are cowards. They attack only in gangs. They expose themselves only when they are sure that they will have overwhelming support. And they understand that many ordinary citizens in Arkansas don’t believe that a history teacher should be fired for writing a letter to a newspaper saying the things Billy said in his letter. And they know that Billy is a fighter, that he won’t go quietly, and so they leave him alone.


What Billy Roper did is what thousands of other high school teachers also can do and should do. It’s what thousands of attorneys and businessmen and factory workers and clerical workers and engineers can and should be doing. And they can do this without destroying their lives or their careers or their families if they use reasonably good judgment. And you know, when you speak out, it doesn’t have to be in the form of a letter to your newspaper. There are thousands of ways of speaking out.


The next time you go to a PTA meeting, don’t just sit there with your mouth shut because you’re sure that no one else will agree with you. Speak out, and speak out strongly on the school policies you disagree with, or make suggestions for new policies you believe the school needs. And sure, some Politically Correct lemming will disagree with you and will criticize you for not being Politically Correct yourself. They are bold because they have become accustomed to speaking out without opposition. Put up a little real opposition, and they will run for cover. And don’t be afraid to use your head and to plan your opposition like a military tactician. Get together with four or five other people who share your views and have them go to the meeting with you. Plan what each of you will say. Provide the liberals with some organized and determined opposition. It’ll be a new experience for them.


If you’re a little shy about speaking in public, just get a small group of people together and have them listen to one of these American Dissident Voices broadcasts in your living room. That’s a very effective way of helping to spread the word. There are millions of our people in America who agree with us – or who are ready to agree, if we help them organize their thoughts. They share our feelings, share our disgust and our horror at what is being done to our world, but they just haven’t thought it all out and reached any conclusions about what they should do. They haven’t put it all together yet. Their biggest obstacle is that they believe they’re all alone. They’ve been so intimidated and beaten down by the controlled media that they are sure no one else shares their feelings. So they try to suppress their feelings and just blend in. They need to be told that they’re not alone.


There’s a storm getting ready to break loose in America. America’s internal enemies have managed to keep the lid on this storm for a long time. They have managed to keep the millions of people who don’t agree with them or who are agreeing with them now only because they are confused and misled – they have managed to keep these millions of White Americans silent and disorganized and demoralized only because they control the mass media. They have managed to maintain an illusion of unanimous agreement with their policies through their media control. But the illusion is wearing thin. The Jews are flooding America with non-White immigrants from Mexico and the Caribbean and Asia and trying to maintain the illusion that most White Americans agree with this policy, that it would be un-Christian or racist to disagree.


Actually, they’re doing a pretty good job of maintaining that illusion. They are succeeding in keeping most White Americans quiet about the immigration disaster, afraid to complain about it. They use their control of television effectively. But that doesn’t mean that most White Americans are happy about the destruction of their country just because they’re staying quiet. And it’s not just the flood of immigrants that has White Americans seething quietly. The Jews and their allies have been bragging about how their media propaganda has gotten more Americans to accept racial intermarriage, and how the rate of miscegenation has climbed dramatically as a result.


That’s true enough. But for every couch potato who has let himself be persuaded that it’s all right for his grandchildren to be mulattos, there is a White American who is angry enough to do some serious killing of the people putting out that poisonous propaganda.


And that’s not all, by any means. The storm is brewing. The pressure is building. The Jews and the politicians may believe that they can keep the lid on. They may believe that by getting laws in the United States like they already have in Canada and Britain and many other countries, making it illegal to write or say anything Politically Incorrect – that is, anything that they can label    as „hate speech“ – they can delay the storm until it is too late for us to save ourselves. They may be right, but I don’t think so. I think that storm will come soon enough to allow our people to redeem ourselves. I also think that when it comes it will be violent enough to blow every last member of their tribe to hell – and also everyone who has collaborated with them. At least, I hope so.


But you know we mustn’t base our future on hope alone. We must act as well. We must do whatever we can to keep the pressure building. That’s why it’s important for all of us to speak out. We don’t want just a blind, undirected storm. We want a purposeful storm. We must help our people understand what is being done to them and who is doing it and why. And we must give them a target for their rage. Above all, we must give them courage and hope now: hope that it is possible after all for our people to survive and the courage to do whatever is necessary to make that possibility become reality.


And it’s not really so difficult for us to do that. All that we really have to do is speak out, to let others know that they are not alone and then to help them straighten out their thoughts. We need to show them just a little bit of courage, to let them know that they too can speak out without being punished for it. We need more people to write forceful but intelligent letters to their local newspapers, more people to bring their friends and neighbors and colleagues into their living rooms to listen to one of these broadcasts. And gradually the understanding will dawn in the minds of that portion of our people that is still healthy, that portion which still is uncorrupted, that we are stronger than all of our enemies. And then the storm – the great, cleansing storm – will break loose.

Wednesday, February 17, 2021

Inside the Gas Chambers


The Extermination of Mainstream Holocaust Historiography




By Carlo Mattogno




Second, slightly revised edition of 2016. Since the early 1990s, critical historians have published a steadily growing number of carefully investigated studies on the so-called “Holocaust.” Hence the orthodox historians, usually paid by the government, were compelled to do something against the rising tide of revisionist arguments. Therefore, after a conference had been held in Germany to discuss the matter, an anthology appeared in early 2011 under the aegis of the German historians Günter Morsch and Bertrand Perz. It claims to refute the arguments of critical historians.


Indicative for this study is, however, that revisionist arguments are basically ignored. Hardly any of the many revisionist works which have appeared over the past 20 years is even mentioned.


In the present book, Italian scholar Carlo Mattogno mercilessly exposes the egregious superficiality and dogmatic ignorance of these historians. Over and over it becomes clear that their claims are in part utterly unfounded or are frequently based on the distorted and disfigured use of sources. Based on his unparalleled knowledge of the source material, Mattogno aptly reduces the theses of the court historians to absurdity. This book summarizes the arguments for and against every single gas chamber claim made for any of the German wartime camps: Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Dachau, Majdanek, Mauthausen, Natzweiler, Neuengamme, Ravensbrück, Sachsenhausen, Sobibor, Stutthof and Treblinka. Even the mystical “Gas Vans” are covered plus the euthanasia centers at Bernburg, Brandenburg, Grafeneck, Hadamar, Hartheim and Sonnenstein. This is the most comprehensive and up-to-date summary of revisionist knowledge.


By means of this book, mainstream Holocaust historiography has suffered a defeat which comes close to its intellectual extermination – literally every alleged “homicidal gas chamber” is shown to be a fraud!

Friday, February 12, 2021

David Irving – The Eichmann Papers


  By David Irving

Published: 2021-01-21


In this one hour and 45 minute long video, the brilliant revisionist writer and researcher, David Irving, is featured. A short introduction by Mark Weber of the Institute of Historical Review details his extra-ordinary career. Beginning with his “Destruction of Dresden” a best seller, to his monumental “Hitler’s War”, David has continually and fearlessly written the truth, regardless of other bogus historians, by incredible and painstaking research. It was David who exposed the so-called Hitler Diaries, for which Rupert Murdoch paid millions of pounds, and which had been “authenticated” by Trevor-Roper, a “leading” historian.


Here David speaks at length about the increasing Zionist harassment to prevent him undertaking historical research and giving speeches across the world. David talks about Hitler’s doctors, all said he was sane. How the RAF killed 17,500 German civilians in 20 minutes in a raid on one town. David talks about his harassment by the newspapers in Britain. David talks about his efforts to obtain the Goebbels diary, which was recorded on glass plates, and ended up in an archive in Russia. Later, David talks about the Eichmann Papers, which he came across, when he was in Argentina. David reveals a great deal about Adolf Eichmann, who learnt Hebrew and studied the Jews. Adolf Eichmann later organised the evacuation of the Jews to concentration camps. David also answers questions at the end of his speech.

Saturday, February 6, 2021

Israel Cracks the Whip




By Philip Giraldi


Anyone who persists in believing that the United States is not Israel’s poodle should pay attention to the comedy that is playing out right now. Joe Biden was president for less than a week when the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu government announced that he would soon be receiving a possibly unwelcome visitor in the form of the Israeli foreign intelligence service Mossad’s chief Yossi Cohen, who will be flying to Washington in February to explain the correct policy when dealing with Iran. And lest there be any confusion on the issue, the Israel Defense Force chief of staff Lieutenant General Aviv Kochavi also announced that any Biden attempt to mend fences with the Islamic Republic will have to meet certain conditions or Israel will exercise other options. He said “In light of this fundamental analysis, I have instructed the Israel Defense Forces to prepare a number of operational plans, in addition to those already in place. It will be up to the political leadership, of course, to decide on implementation but these plans need to be on the table.” Another government minister clarified that the options would include “an attack” on Iran, though there has been no indication whether or not Israel would possibly contemplate deploying its tactical nuclear weapons to prevent retaliation by Iranian forces.


There is no limit to Israeli hubris. A leading Rabbi in Israel is predicting that as the United States is in decline it is up to the Jewish state to take over the role of “guiding civilization forward.” And that kind of thinking shapes how Israel treats the United States with condescension, acting as if it is the knowledgeable elder statesman whose guidance must be respected. In this case the Zionist solution to the Iran problem will by design be unpalatable for the government in Tehran if it intends to remain sovereign. For Israel the correct policy for dealing with Iran is to effectively disarm it and make it impossible to establish any sphere of influence in the countries adjacent to it, to include Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. That would be to concede Israeli dominance over the entire region and if the Iranians do not play ball the next step would be to convince the United States to attack it on some pretext, possibly to include an Israeli “false flag” to start the process going.


The Times of Israel sums up the Israeli official position as “…Iran must halt the enriching of uranium; stop producing advanced centrifuges; cease supporting terror groups, foremost Lebanon’s Hezbollah; end its military presence in Iraq, Syria and Yemen; stop terror activity against Israeli targets overseas; and grant full access to the IAEA on all aspects of its nuclear program.” Completing the disarming of Iran would also include requiring Tehran to abandon its ballistic missile program.


The irony is, of course, that it is Israel that has a secret nuclear arsenal that it created by stealing uranium and triggers from the United States and it is also the leading regional supporter of terrorist groups, to include al-Qaeda and ISIS. Iran’s presence in Syria is due to its lending assistance to the Damascus government’s resistance to the insurgencies supported by Israel and the United States. And Iran has not targeted Israeli citizens and groups overseas, but Israel and the U.S. have assassinated Iranian officials while also bombing both government and civilian targets in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon. And all of the kinetics occur in a context where Israel continues its illegal occupation of Palestine and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people replete with both war crimes and crimes against humanity. Iran is also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Israel is not, so who is the rogue state?


Biden will likely fold like a cheap suit when confronted by the force majeure of Cohen. The new American president has assembled a national security team for dealing with the Middle East that is nearly all Jewish and all Zionist, an affliction that he himself claims to suffer from. The Biden nominee for secretary of state Tony Blinken said at a confirmation hearing last week that the new administration would “consult with Israel” before any possible return to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action (JCPOA) nuclear deal and he also made clear that there would be additional conditions for Iran. It was an odd comment for a government official who is supposed to support American interests, but it was predictably what Congress wanted to hear. As Iran has already indicated that it is unwilling to abandon its defenses and its role in the region, the Biden proposal will be a non-starter in any case, though Israel will be prepared to apply its own veto if anything undertaken by the State Department moves beyond the talking stage.


Currently there is credible speculation that Israeli intelligence has been able to compromise most if not all of the U.S. government’s information systems as well as those of major corporations. As the Jewish state is the most active in spying against the United States, that should surprise no one. For Israel to interfere in U.S. politics or government blatantly is not exactly new, though it is rare to have anyone in the mainstream media or in government say anything about. That is because Israel’s ability to wage war against critics is second to none, having at its back nearly unlimited financial resources and easy access to the media as well as active supporters from among the nearly six hundred Jewish organizations that exist in the United States.


Indeed, Israel has been involved in American politics frequently, one might even argue incessantly, even if it is predictably never held accountable. To cite only one well known example, it has been suggested that Russiagate was really Israelgate based on what actually took place shortly after the 2016 election. The contact with Russia was set up by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was at the time seeking to kill an anti-Israeli vote in the United Nations. He sought to do so by lobbying Donald Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner on the matter shortly after the 2016 election. Netanyahu was particularly close to the Kushner family, having on at least one occasion slept overnight at their mansion in Manhattan.


Prompted by Netanyahu, Kushner dutifully contacted Trump National Security Advisor-designate Michael Flynn and asked him to privately call Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak to lobby Moscow to vote against the bill. There were two phone calls but Kislyak refused to cooperate. It should be noted that while all of this was taking place Barack Obama was still president and his intention to abstain on a vote on Israel’s illegal settlements is what provoked Netanyahu to act, so Netanyahu-Kushner-Flynn were subverting their own elected government and were definitely in the wrong. Flynn was subsequently thrown under the bus by his Jewish friends without any mention in the media of the Israeli role, thereby becoming the first casualty of “Russiagate.” He was subsequently forced to resign from his post in disgrace in February 2017.


The whole issue of the U.S.-Israel relationship constitutes one of the most formidable “red lines” in American politics as part of its power comes from the fact that the media and political classes pretend that it does not even exist. Israel’s power was poisonous enough prior to the election of Donald Trump, but Trump, “advised” by a gaggle of orthodox Jews, dramatically shifted the playing field to favor Israel in ways that will define the relationship for years to come. Biden’s team is little better and the president will be taking his orders from Jerusalem and saluting as long as he stays in the White House. Will it lead to a totally unnecessary and unwinnable war with Iran? That is what Israel demands above all, and Israel always gets what it wants.

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is