Caricatures from "Der Stürmer" - translated in English and colourized - The Year 1940 – Part 8!

The Year 1940 – Part 8

November 7th 1917: The Holodomor’s Horrors

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/november-7th-1917-part-one-the-holodomors-horrors/

 

On this day, November 7th, 107 years ago, the October Revolution erupted. It was spearheaded by the Bolshevik Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov, known as Lenin (he was of JEWISH ancestry). The consequences of this Revolution were catastrophic for the entire world. A new totalitarian regime was established in Russia, which was renamed the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). This marked the beginning of a dark era. Millions of ethnic Russians were killed, and the government became infiltrated by individuals with Jewish backgrounds, with 28 out of 30 Party representatives being Jewish. COMMUNISM KILLS!!! Today, few dare to acknowledge its horrors, and the 100 million victims of the Gulag are largely forgotten. The narrative often focuses solely on “the 6 million Jews who perished in the Holocaust”, placing the blame on the Germans.

 

I will reveal the truth about the murderous machinery of the Communist regime.

 

The Holodomor was a man-made famine in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic during 1932 and 1933, inflicted by Stalin’s regime on Soviet Ukraine and primarily Ukrainian regions in the Northern Caucasus, resulting in the deaths of 6 million people. The current Putinist regime denies this event, which I refer to as the Red Revolutionary Holocaust. During Soviet times, anyone who attempted to highlight this tragedy faced suppression through propaganda. For many years, the great famine was only known through limited pamphlets published by Ukrainian organizations and remained largely unrecognized until the late 1980s. Literature about the Ukrainian famine was censored, and authors faced arrest.

 

During the Holodomor, people lived in fear of what was known as the Ear law. Those condemned under this law faced severe penalties for merely taking a few ears of corn or rye from the fields, with some receiving the death penalty for such acts. They were trapped, unable to leave, and no one was allowed in. The GPU implemented a strict ban on the movement of peasants from Ukraine and the Northern Caucasus, viewing it as a direct threat to collectivization efforts and the authority of the Soviet government. Railway services were halted, and barricades were erected to prevent escape. In a desperate attempt to protect their children, many parents sent them to nearby cities, hoping someone will care for them while they return to their villages, often to face death. However, the streets were monitored by Dvorniki, who rounded up these children and any peasants attempting to flee starvation, delivering them to the police station. There, a medical team conducted a selection process; those who have not yet shown signs of severe malnutrition are sent to the Holodnaya Gora buildings, where countless individuals lied dying on straw beds. Those already exhibiting signs of swelling were taken approximately 40 miles away and left to perish out of sight.

 

The population was not only battling hunger but also the threat of typhus, an infectious disease caused by rickettsiae, marked by a purple rash, severe headaches, fever, and often delirium. Historically, typhus has claimed many lives during times of war and famine.

 

Disturbingly, some bodies were discovered with their livers excised through a slit in the abdomen. Authorities apprehended individuals involved in these gruesome acts, who confessed to using human liver as a filling for meat pies sold in local markets.

 

Farmers were subjected to brutal torture to extract their remaining supplies. In a desperate bid to protect their grain from state confiscation, some farmers attempted to bury it. However, the authorities employed various methods to uncover these hidden reserves. One method involved stripping the worker naked and leaving them exposed to the freezing cold in a hangar.

 

Another horrific technique involved dousing the feet and skirts of female workers with gasoline and igniting them, only to extinguish the flames and repeat the process, inflicting unimaginable pain.

 

Death permeated every aspect of life, leading many to resort to cannibalism. Countless fatalities went unrecorded, extortion became a norm, children were left to fend for themselves, and banditry surged. The peasantry faced a new, insidious form of slavery. In a desperate plea, Sholokhov reached out to Joseph Stalin, urging him to send “real communists” who would not exploit their authority and to halt the torment inflicted on farmers in the name of grain collection.

 

Stalin’s response included a stark warning: “Workers in your district, and in many others, have gone on strike, engaged in sabotage, and were ready to deprive Red Army soldiers of bread! This sabotage, though seemingly peaceful and bloodless, is a blatant attempt to undermine the Soviet state. It is a fight to the death, Comrade Sholokhov! While this does not excuse the abuses committed by our personnel, those responsible will be held accountable. However, it is evident that our esteemed workers are far from the innocent victims you portray in your letters.”

 

This situation starkly illustrates the harsh reality under Communist rule, where individuals are rendered insignificant and subjected to relentless labour, only to have everything stripped away. Starvation is a weapon wielded by the communists, as evidenced not only by the catastrophic famine in Ukraine but also by other historical instances of oppression. These are not mere echoes of the past; they are warnings of what could recur if society fails to recognize the underlying issues.

 

The Holodomor genocide famine in Ukraine from 1932 to 1933 resulted in the deaths of millions due to starvation. This mass food confiscation initiative, orchestrated by the Judeo-Communist regime, was designed to crush Ukrainian resistance to its tyranny.

Heroine Ursula Haverbeck Will Live on in Our Hearts

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/heroic-heroine-ursula-haverbeck-will-live-on-in-our-hearts/

 

Ursula Haverbeck recently died at the age of 96. At the time, she was appealing an “incitement to hatred” conviction.

 

Enemy propaganda outlet DW reports:

 

Haverbeck, who was married for many years to a former member of the Nazi organizations SA and SS, was convicted several times since 2004 for her comments denying that the Holocaust — which she once called the “most tenacious lie of history” — ever took place.

 

She previously served two years in prison for Holocaust denial and was appealing another prison sentence of a year and four months handed down by the court in Hamburg when her death occurred.

 

Because she lived in an occupied country, the truth is no defense, and free speech is completely banned in Germany. Yet Ursula was undeterred by her repeated convictions. She would continue to use every opportunity possible to advocate for her German people against the vicious defamation they have faced since WWII ended.

 

Ursula’s unwavering conviction and compelling presentations made her a threat to the powers that rule over Germany, and they felt truly threatened by her. When the truth is spoken by heroic people such as Ursula, the reality our enemies have constructed with decades of lies quickly shatters.

 

Here is one of Ursula’s most famous presentations.

 

Ursula Haverbeck’s work will not be in vain. She has inspired many people with her courage, and they will continue to advocate for the truth and justice for Germany.

Ursula Haverbeck (ᛉ 08.11.1928 – 20.11.2024 ᛣ)

 

“Prepare yourself for the day of truth. It is near and unstoppable.”

 

Ursula Haverbeck

(ᛉ 08.11.1928 – 20.11.2024 ᛣ)

Adolf Hitler on the German Revolution of 1918

Source: Hitler on the Jews by Thomas Dalton

 

Marxism – whose final objective was, is, and will continue to be the destruction of all non-Jewish national states – saw in those days of July 1914 how the German working classes were aroused by a national spirit, and rapidly entered the service of the Fatherland. Within a few days, the deceptive smoke-screen of that infamous national betrayal vanished into thin air, and the gang of Jewish bosses suddenly found themselves alone and deserted. It was as if no vestige remained of the folly and madness that was foisted upon the mass of the German people for 60 years. That was a bad day for the betrayers of the German working class. The moment, however, that the leaders recognized the danger that threatened them, they pulled the magic cap of deceit over their ears, and insolently mimicked the national awakening.

 

The time had come for taking action against these Jewish poisoners of the people. That was the time to deal with them, regardless of any whining or protestation. At one stroke, in August of 1914, all the empty nonsense about international solidarity was knocked out of the heads of the German working classes. A few weeks later, instead of this stupid talk ringing in their ears, they heard the noise of American-made shrapnel bursting over the heads of the marching columns; there was your ‘international brotherhood.’ Now that the German worker had rediscovered the road to nationhood, it should have been the duty of any caring government to mercilessly root out the agitators who were misleading the nation.

 

If the best were dying at the front, the least we could do is to exterminate the vermin.

 

Instead, His Majesty the Kaiser held out his hand to these old criminals, thus sparing these treacherous murderers of the nation and allowing them to regain their composure.

 

And so the viper could begin his work again – this time, more carefully than before, but even more destructively. While honest people dreamt of reconciliation, these perjured criminals were organizing a revolution. (MK1: 5.7)

 

* * *

 

While the Jew was busy robbing the nation and tightening the screws of his despotism, incitement against ‘the Prussians’ increased. And just as at the front, nothing was done to stop this poisonous propaganda. No one seemed capable of understanding that the collapse of Prussia could never bring about the rise of Bavaria. On the contrary, the collapse of the one would necessarily drag the other down into the abyss.

 

This kind of behaviour affected me very deeply. I could see in it only a clever Jewish trick for diverting public attention from themselves to others. While Prussians and Bavarians were squabbling, the Jews were taking away the sustenance of both from under their very noses. While Prussians were being abused in Bavaria, the Jew organized the revolution, and with one stroke smashed both Prussia and Bavaria. (MK1: 7.5)

 

* * *

 

Then one day, disaster broke upon us suddenly and without warning. Sailors came in trucks and proclaimed the revolution. A few Jewish youth were the ‘leaders’ in that combat for the ‘Liberty, Beauty, and Dignity’ of our national being. Not one of them saw active service at the front. By way of a so-called ‘hospital for venereal disease,’ these three Orientals had been sent back home. Now their red rags were being raised here. (MK1: 7.11)

 

* * *

 

The real organizer of the Revolution and its actual wire-puller, the international Jew, had correctly sized up the situation. The German people were not yet ripe to be drawn into the bloody swamp of Bolshevism, as happened in Russia. This was because there was a closer racial union between the German intellectual classes and the manual workers. Also, the broad social strata were permeated with cultured people, such as was the case also in the other Western European countries, but was completely lacking in Russia. (MK2: 9.4)

 

* * *

 

The Jew was far too shrewd not to understand that the infamous campaign that he had organized, under the cloak of war societies, for plundering the German nation would, and eventually must, arouse opposition. But as long as it didn’t jump directly at his own throat, he had no reason to fear it. Hence he decided that the best way to forestall an explosion by the despairing and indignant masses was to cause their rage to flare up elsewhere and thus to divert it.

 

Let Bavaria fight as much as it liked with Prussia, and Prussia with Bavaria; the more the better! The bitterest struggle between the two meant the securest peace for the Jew. Thus public attention was completely diverted from this international maggot of peoples; indeed, he was all but forgotten. Then if there came a danger that level-headed people – of whom there are many to be found in Bavaria, as elsewhere – might call for understanding, reflection, and restraint, thus calming the outrage, the Jew in Berlin simply had to stage a new provocation and await results. In an instant, all those who profiteered from the conflict between North and South once again fanned the flames of indignation until they blazed.

 

It was a shrewd and expert game played by the Jew, to occupy and distract the different branches of the German people, in order to plunder them all the more completely.

 

Then came the Revolution. (MK2: 10.1)

 

* * *

 

Before the Revolution, the Jew was successful in distracting attention from himself and his war societies by inciting the masses, and especially the Bavarians, against Prussia. After the Revolution, he had to camouflage his new, and ten-times greater, campaign of plunder. And again he succeeded, in this case by provoking the so-called ‘national’ elements against one another: the conservative Bavarians against the equally conservative-minded Prussians. And again he acted with extreme cunning, inasmuch as he who held the reins of the Reich’s destiny provoked such crude and tactless aggressions that they set the blood boiling of those who were affected. Never against the Jew, but always against the German brother. The Bavarian didn’t see the Berlin of 4,000,000 industrious and efficient workers, but only the rotten, decadent Berlin of the vilest West Side! And his hatred wasn’t directed against this West Side but against the ‘Prussian’ city. (MK2: 10.5)

What Books Did the ‘Nazis’ Burn?

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/what-books-did-the-nazis-burn

 

by Karl Radl

 

We are often shown the photos of the members of the NSDAP and the SA ‘burning books’ on Berlin’s Opernplatz (lit. ‘Opera Square’) on 10th May 1933 along with trite warnings that ‘those who burn books end up burning people’ – which forgets that the Allied authorities compiled a list of circa 30,000 ‘Nazi books’ to be confiscated and destroyed in 1946 and acted on it – (1) but few have asked the question: what books did the Nazis burn?

 

To understand that we have to go back to four days before the famous book burning on 10th May 1933 to something that happened on 6th May 1933: the student raid on the ‘Institute for Sexual Research’ in Berlin which was a homosexual and sexual deviancy advocacy organization created and run by a jewish member of the Social Democratic Party named Magnus Hirschfeld. (2)

 

This was part of a broader campaign by the just elected NSDAP – after winning two general elections in 1932 and being denied power by a ‘conservative’ military dictatorship for over a year – against homosexual advocacy groups and pro-homosexual publications which began almost immediately after Adolf Hitler became German chancellor on 30th January 1933 and outlawed abortion on 15th February 1933 (3) and both pornography and homosexual rights organizations on 23rd February 1933. (4)

 

As it happens Hirschfeld’s ‘Institute for Sexual Research’ violated all three of these laws as well as the famous Paragraph 175 of the Prussian Legal Code which had officially forbade (male) homosexuality for decades, but the so-called ‘conservative’ German authorities had turned a blind eye to it since the eighteenth century. (5)

 

This is because despite the focus on its well-known promotion of homosexuality; Hirschfeld’s institute was also paid by successive German and Prussian governments to promote contraception and abortion (6) (as well as wanted to promote it for its own sake) (7) as well as also having a substantial collection of tens of thousands of ‘sexual photographs’ (i.e., homosexual/degenerate pornography) and ‘phallic objects’ (i.e., historic dildos) which were exhibited to anyone who wanted to see them in Hirschfeld’s ‘Museum of Sex’ but which were particularly promoted to young men and boys. (8)

 

Nor was this limited to Hirschfeld’s institute given that homosexuality and deviant sexual practices were commonly openly advertised seen on the streets of Berlin in 1932 with the famous American anti-Nazi journal Edgar Mowrer testifying in disgust in 1933 that:

 

‘Berlin in July 1932. In the window of a book store near the most central street-corner of the city, the following books on display (titles translated):

 

The Witches’ Love-Kettle.

 

Eroticism in Photography.

 

Sexual Errors.

 

Flagellantism and Jesuit Confessions.

 

The Labyrinth of Eroticism.

 

Sadism and Masochism (fifty cents, reduced from a dollar).

 

The Whip in Sexuality.

 

Sappho and Lesbos.

 

The Cruel Female.

 

Massage Institutes (for adults only).

 

A Magazine, The Third Sex.

 

The Venal Female.

 

Venal Love among Civilised Peoples.

 

Places of Prostitution in Berlin.

 

Around the purely German products were the “love classics” of two continents. While I stood and wrote down the titles, a crowd of adolescents gathered and made remarks about “lustful foreigners”. To them it was all an old story. Other book stores exhibited a similar line.

 

Somehow the unhampered exhibit and sale of these works was a symbol of German democracy and the “freest Republic in the world”.’ (9)

 

And the jewish Marxist and homosexual activist Richard Plant later wrote that:

 

‘During the Weimar Republic, the homosexual subculture had managed an uneasy coexistence with the larger heterosexual society surrounding it. Of course, those in the spotlight – famous actors, designers, dancers, doctors, politicians, directors, and lawyers – had to live with a certain amount of abuse. But many had acquired power, money, and even connections to the Weimar government, which served as protection. The average gay man could live unnoticed and undisturbed unless he fell victim to police entrapment or blackmail. The average lesbian enjoyed a kind of legal immunity. During the Weimar years, organized lesbian costume balls were held; luxurious lesbian bars and nightclubs flourished. Their owners never feared a police raid. The reason: neither the Second German Empire nor the Weimar Repubic had ever promulgated laws forbidding or punishing sexual acts between women. Lesbian magazines enjoyed healthy circulations, some even featuring personal ads, and a few lesbian plays achieved widespread popularity.’ (10)

 

In essence homosexuality and sexual degeneracy were widespread and it thus should not a surprise that Hirschfeld’s institute and its similarly jewish promoters of homosexuality like the publisher Bernhard Zack (11) and the anarchistic homosexual sexologist (and friend of Hirschfeld’s) Benedict Friedlander who also helped fund the publication of pro-homosexual and pro-pederast leaflets were among the first to be targeted. (12)

 

Therefore, it should be no shock that the NSDAP – and especially Goebbels – referred to Hirschfeld’s institute ‘an unparalleled breeding ground of dirt and filth’ (13) and the SA spent the summer of 1933 going around Germany smashing up gay bars and beating up those who patronised them. (14)

 

This is the historical context to what then happened on 10th May 1933 on the Opernplatz in Berlin and also why the institute was raided by National Socialist students – with SA, SS and police support – on the 6th and once again on 10th May 1933 which is recounted without the required historical context by Dose:

 

‘On May 6, 1933, the institute was plundered by a horde of National Socialist physical education students. Portions of the library were thrown on a bonfire on the Opernplatz (Opera Square) on May 10, including Hirschfeld’s bust, which had been skewered on a stick.’ (15)

 

And with some of the necessary historical context by Evans:

 

‘On the morning of 6 May 1933, a group of vans pulled up outside Dr Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science in the smart Tiergarten district of Berlin. Out of them leapt students from the Berlin School for Physical Education, members of the National Socialist German Students’ League. They drew up in military formation, then, while some of them took out their trumpets and tubas and started to play patriotic music, the other marched into the building. Their intentions were clearly unfriendly. Hirschfeld’s Institute was well known in Berlin, not only for its championing of causes such as the legalization of homosexuality and abortion, and for its popular evening classes in sexual education, but also for its comprehensive collection of books and manuscripts on sexual topics, built up by the director since before the turn of the century. By 1933 it housed between 12,000 and 20,000 books – estimates vary – and an even larger collection of photographs on sexual subjects. The Nazi students who stormed into the Institute on 6 May 1933 proceeded to pour red ink over books and manuscripts, played football with framed photographs, leaving the floor covered in shards of broken glass, and ransacked the cupboards and drawers throwing their contents onto the floor. Four days later, more vans arrived, this time with stormtroopers carrying baskets, into which they piled as many books and manuscripts as they could and took them out onto the Opera Square. Here they stacked them up in a gigantic heap and set light to them. About 10,000 books are said to have been consumed in the conflagration. As the fire burned on into the evening, the students carried a bust of the Institute’s director into the Square and threw into the flames.’ (16)

 

Put another way: the NSDAP student members ransacked and vandalized the institute on 6th May 1933, but then on 10th May the SA, SS and police arrived to take away the institute’s pornography (the photograph/magazine collection), degenerate books (including the works of the Marquis de Sade for example) and the ‘phallic object’ collection (i.e., the historic dildo collection exhibited in Hirschfeld’s ‘Museum of Sex’) which they then took away in vans to the Opernplatz where they proceeded to burn them that evening.

 

So, the common meme is right: in essence the NSDAP actually burnt Magnus Hirschfeld’s gay porn and sex toy collection not the books of history and philosophy people tried to imply they were burning on 10th May 1933.

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies. This post is public so feel free to share it.

---

References

 

(1) For example, see: https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/denazified-library

 

(2) Ralf Dose, 2014, ‘Magnus Hirschfeld and the Origins of the Gay Liberation Movement’, 1st Edition, Monthly Review Press: New York, p. 7

 

(3) Cf. Henry David, Jochen Fleischhacker, Charlotte Hohn, 1981, ‘Abortion and Eugenics in Nazi Germany’, Population and Development Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 81-112

 

(4) Richard Plant, 1986, ‘The Pink Triangle: The Nazi War against Homosexuals’, 1st Edition, Henry Holt: New York, p. 50

 

(5) Ibid., p. 40

 

(6) Robert Beachy, 2014, ‘Gay Berlin: Birthplace of a Modern Identity’, 1st Edition, Knopf Doubleday: New York, p. 182

 

(7) Richard Evans, 2004, ‘The Coming of the Third Reich’, 1st Edition, Penguin: London, p. 375

 

(8) Beachy, Op. Cit., pp. xii; xiv; 162-164

 

(9) Edgar Ansel Mowrer, 1937, ‘Germany Puts the Clock Back’, 2nd Edition, Penguin: London, p. 149

 

(10) Plant, Op. Cit., p. 27

 

(11) Friedrich Dobe, 1987, ‘John Henry Mackay als Mensch’, 1st Edition, Edition Plato: Koblenz, pp. 18-19

 

(12) Ibid., p. 17

 

(13) Plant, Op. Cit., p. 51

 

(14) Ibid.

 

(15) Dose, Op. Cit., p. 65

 

(16) Evans, Op. Cit., p. 375

 

via Karl Radl’s Substack

Caricatures from "Der Stürmer" - translated in English and colourized - The Year 1940 – Part 7!

 The Year 1940 – Part 7