Monday, October 12, 2026

The “Miracle of Dunkirk”

 

Source: https://codoh.com/library/document/the-miracle-of-dunkirk/

 

The Battle of Dunkirk occurred from May 26, 1940 to June 4, 1940. Approximately 338,000 British Expeditionary Force (BEF) and other Allied troops were evacuated from Dunkirk, France to England as German forces closed in on them. This massive military operation, which involved hundreds of naval and civilian vessels, became known as the “Miracle of Dunkirk.” This largely successful evacuation of most of Britain’s trained troops proved to be a key moment in the victorious Allied war effort.[1]

 

Germany’s offensive against Dunkirk was halted by Adolf Hitler’s order on May 24, 1940. A controversy has developed as to why Hitler issued this order which enabled so many British troops to escape to England. Many historians claim that Hitler issued this order solely because of his military incompetence. Other historians state that Hitler halted his troops as a peace offering to prevent an irreparable breach between Britain and Germany.

 

This article discusses the evidence as to why Hitler ordered the German offensive at Dunkirk stopped, thereby allowing hundreds of thousands of British troops to be evacuated from Dunkirk.

 

Hitler’s Alleged Military Incompetence

 

Most mainstream historians state that military incompetence was the reason Hitler ordered his troops to halt before reaching Dunkirk. For example, German historian Volker Ullrich writes about Hitler’s decision:[2]

 

“What is certain is that his order to halt the advance was not his decision alone, but rather came after an intensive discussion with Colonel-General von Rundstedt. During the morning of 24 May, the dictator met with the commander of Army Group A in his headquarters in Charleville to discuss how to proceed. There, he learned that Rundstedt had already ordered German troops to halt so that motorized units and infantry divisions could catch up with the battle-worn tank groups.

 

Hitler agreed with Rundstedt about the situation. The dictator was already looking ahead to the next phase of the campaign and wanted to conserve his tank force for coming operations. To this end, he explicitly left it up to Rundstedt when the advance would continue. Thus, Hitler’s actions were guided by military considerations. A few days later, however, when it became clear that he had made a serious error, he cited an ex post facto political reason, claiming that he had purposely let the British expeditionary corps escape so as to preserve the possibility of a peace settlement with Britain.”

 

Ullrich writes that there is no truth in the idea that Hitler wanted to take it easy on the British. On the contrary, Ullrich writes that Hitler trusted Göring’s assurances that the Luftwaffe would easily be able to stop an evacuation of the BEF by sea.[3]

 

British historian Ian Kershaw writes:[4]

 

“Post-war suggestions that Hitler was deliberately allowing the British troops to get away as an act of generosity to encourage Britain to come to the peace table with its armies intact are far-fetched. Hitler himself was alleged to have told his entourage a fortnight or so later that ‘the army is the backbone of England and the Empire. If we smash the invasion corps, the Empire is doomed. Since we neither want to nor can inherit it, we must leave it the chance. My generals haven’t grasped that.’ Such sentiments, if they were indeed expressed in those terms, were no more than a self-justification for a military mistake. For the decision not to move on Dunkirk was taken for military reasons, and on military advice.”

 

German Gen. Heinz Guderian wrote about Dunkirk:[5]

 

“Winston Churchill, in his memoirs of the Second World War, says that some of the German generals suggested that by holding up his tanks outside Dunkirk Hitler was hoping either to give the English an opportunity to sue for peace or to increase Germany’s chances of negotiating a settlement. Neither then nor at any later period did I ever hear anything to substantiate this suggestion. Churchill’s guess that Rundstedt may have himself decided to hold up the armor is also wide of the mark. As the commander on the spot, I am able, moreover, definitely to state that the heroic defense of Calais, although worthy of the highest praise, yet had no influence on the development of events outside Dunkirk. Churchill assumes, quite correctly, that Hitler and above all Goering believed German air supremacy to be strong enough to prevent the evacuation of the British forces by sea. This belief was a mistake pregnant with consequence, for only the capture of the British Expeditionary Force could have influenced the English towards making peace with Hitler or could have created the conditions necessary for a successful German invasion of Great Britain.”

 

Hitler explained his Dunkirk decision at Brussels, where Gen. Fedor von Bock had assembled his senior generals:[6]

 

“Gentlemen, you will have wondered why I stopped the armored divisions outside Dunkirk. The fact was I could not afford to waste military effort. I was anxious lest the enemy launch an offensive from the Somme and wipe out the Fourth Army’s weak armored force, perhaps even going so far as Dunkirk. Such a military rebuff might have had intolerable effects in foreign policy.”

 

After Hitler ordered his tank forces to hold back on May 24, 1940, Hermann Göring announced that his Luftwaffe would take care of the British: “Our air force is to mop up the British. I’ve persuaded the Führer to hold the army back.” Göring stated to German Gen. Erhard Milch, “The Führer wants us to give them a lesson they’ll never forget.”[7]

 

Historian Hans-Adolf Jacobsen writes about Dunkirk:[8]

 

“Frequently in the earlier literature one finds the idea put forward that Hitler issued the ‘Halt-Order’ intentionally to give Britain ‘a golden bridge’ so that parts of the British army could escape. A ‘chivalrous’ gesture of that kind would contribute to a quicker peaceable understanding with Churchill. This contention belongs in the realm of numerous untrue postwar legends.”

 

Hitler’s Alleged Desire for Peace

 

Hitler had never wanted war with Great Britain. To Hitler, Great Britain was the natural ally of Germany and the nation he admired most. Hitler had no ambitions against Britain or her Empire, and all of the captured records solidly bear this out.[9]

 

After Germany’s conquest of Poland, Hitler made a peace offer to Britain and France that was quickly rejected. Included in Hitler’s peace offer was the evacuation of Poland by the Wehrmacht, except for Danzig and the “Corridor.”[10]

 

Hitler’s desire to make peace with Great Britain continued throughout the war. Numerous sources state that Hitler’s desire to make peace with Great Britain was the reason Hitler ordered his troops to halt before reaching Dunkirk.

 

For example, Gerard Menuhin in his book Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil states that he asked Dr. Gerhard Frey why Hitler had allowed the evacuation of the British army at Dunkirk, when Hitler had the opportunity of capturing the entire British army. Dr. Frey replied:[11]

 

“It had been a last gambit to gain some understanding with Britain…In fact, Hitler had been duped since the Munich Agreement in September 1938 into believing that there existed in Britain a strong movement for appeasement and against war with Germany, a movement led by Chamberlain, which would outweigh in importance and effect Churchill’s warmongering faction. This illusion had been fostered by banker Kurt von Schroder, who backed the ‘Anglo-American Fellowship’ (an organization to which many leading British industrialists and companies belonged). Hence, Hitler’s reluctance to attack the British Expeditionary Force in its hopeless position on the beaches.”

 

German Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt insisted that his hands were tied by Hitler’s instructions to halt the offensive against Dunkirk. Hitler talked to Rundstedt and two key men of his staff, Gen. Georg von Sodenstern and Gen. Günther Blumentritt. As Gen. Blumentritt tells the story:[12]

 

“He [Hitler] then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. […] He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s lost colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in any difficulties anywhere. He [Hitler] concluded by saying that his aim was to make peace with Britain on a basis that she would regard as compatible with her honor to accept.”

 

Blumentritt often thought about this conversation in his subsequent reflections on the course of events at Dunkirk. Blumentritt felt that Hitler had ordered the halt for more than military reasons, and that it was part of his political plan to make peace easier to reach. If the BEF had been captured at Dunkirk, Hitler thought the British might have felt that their honor had suffered a stain that must be eliminated. Hitler had hoped to conciliate the British by letting the BEF escape.[13]

 

There is also evidence that the Luftwaffe was not used as fully or as vigorously as it could have been. Some of the German air chiefs say that Hitler put the brake on here as well.[14]

 

British historian F.J.P. Veale wrote about the evacuation of British troops at Dunkirk:[15]

 

“That the bulk of the troops succeeded in escaping at all was due entirely to Hitler’s delusion that the dark menace of Asia overshadowing Europe would induce Great Britain to come to an understanding with Germany in self-protection.”

 

Hitler told his friend Frau Troost:[16]

 

“The blood of every single Englishman is too valuable to be shed. Our two people belong together, racially, and traditionally – this is and always has been my aim even if our generals can’t grasp it.”

 

Hitler stated in his Testament on February 26, 1945:[17]

 

“Churchill was quite unable to appreciate the sporting spirit of which I had given proof by refraining from creating an irreparable breach between the British and ourselves. We did, indeed, refrain from annihilating them at Dunkirk. We ought to have been able to make them realize that the acceptance by them of the German hegemony established in Europe, a state of affairs to the implementation of which they had always been opposed, but which I had implemented without any trouble, would bring them inestimable advantages.”

 

Having been given the gift of Dunkirk by Hitler, Churchill refused to acknowledge it. Churchill instead described the evacuation of British troops off the beaches of Dunkirk as a heroic miracle accomplished by the British navy. Churchill became even more bellicose in his determination to continue the war.[18]

 

What is the Truth?

 

There is little question that Hitler’s order to halt the offensive against Dunkirk allowed the British troops to escape. In an interview after the war, German Gen. Ewald von Kleist stated:[19]

 

“We could have wiped out the British army completely or taken the whole army as captive if it weren’t for the stupid order of Hitler.”

 

It is also generally recognized that Hitler’s order to halt his troops before reaching Dunkirk hurt the German war effort. German Gen. Erich von Manstein wrote:[20]

 

“Dunkirk was one of Hitler’s most devastating mistakes. It hampered him in attempting the invasion of Britain and subsequently enabled the British to fight in Africa and Italy.”

 

So, why did Hitler order his troops to halt before reaching Dunkirk?

 

In this author’s opinion, Hitler had hoped to make peace with the British and preserve the British Empire. Hitler’s desire to preserve the British Empire was expressed on another occasion when the military fortunes of the Allies were at their lowest ebb. When France appealed for an armistice, German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop gave the following summary of Hitler’s attitude toward Great Britain in a strictly private talk with the Italian Foreign Minister Count Galeazzo Ciano:[21]

 

“He [Ribbentrop] said that in the Führer’s opinion the existence of the British Empire as an element of stability and social order in the world is very useful. In the present state of affairs, it would be impossible to replace it with another, similar organization. Therefore, the Führer – as he has also recently stated in public – does not desire the destruction of the British Empire. He asks that England renounce some of its possessions and recognize the fait accompli. On these conditions Hitler would be prepared to come to an agreement.”

 

After Dunkirk, Ribbentrop wrote that Hitler was enthused with making a quick peace with England. Hitler outlined the peace terms he was prepared to offer the British:[22]

 

“It will only be a few points, and the first point is that nothing must be done between England and Germany which would in any way violate the prestige of Great Britain. Secondly, Great Britain must give us back one or two of our old colonies. That is the only thing we want.”

 

Ribbentrop told Rep. Hamilton Fish that cooperation between England and Germany was essential for the maintenance of peace. Hitler had even “offered to place 15 German army divisions and the entire fleet at the disposal of the British government to support her empire in case of war anywhere in the world.” Fish did not believe this statement from Ribbentrop at the time, but it was substantiated years later.[23]

 

On June 25, 1940, Hitler telephoned Joseph Goebbels to lay out the terms of an agreement with Great Britain. Goebbels wrote in his diary:[24]

 

“The Führer […] believes that the [British Empire] must be preserved if at all possible. For if it collapses, then we shall not inherit it, but foreign and even hostile powers take it over. But if England will have it no other way, then she must be beaten to her knees. The Führer, however, would be agreeable to peace on the following basis: England out of Europe, colonies and mandates returned. Reparations for what was stolen from us after [World War I].”

 

Hitler took the initiative to end the war after the fall of France in June 1940. In a victory speech on July 19, 1940, Hitler declared that it had never been his intention to destroy or even harm the British Empire. Hitler made a general peace offer in the following words:[25]

 

“In this hour I feel it to be my duty before my conscience to appeal once more to reason and commonsense in Great Britain as much as elsewhere. I consider myself in a position to make this appeal, since I am not the vanquished, begging favors, but the victor, speaking in the name of reason. I can see no reason why this war must go on.”

 

This speech was followed by private diplomatic overtures to Great Britain through Sweden, the United States, and the Vatican. There is no question that Hitler was eager to end the war. But Churchill was in the war with the objective of destroying Germany. Churchill was not concerned with saving the British Empire from destruction. British Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax also wanted the war to continue, and brushed aside what he called Hitler’s “summons to capitulate at his will.”[26] Hitler’s peace offer was officially rejected on July 22, 1940.[27]

 

Hitler’s desire to preserve the British Empire was expressed on numerous other occasions. For example, on August 14, 1940, during the Battle of Britain, Hitler called his field marshals into the Reich Chancellery to impress upon them that victory over Britain must not lead to the collapse of the British Empire:[28]

 

“Germany is not striving to smash Britain because the beneficiaries will not be Germany, but Japan in the east, Russia in India, Italy in the Mediterranean, and America in world trade. This is why peace is possible with Britain – but not so long as Churchill is prime minister. Thus, we must see what the Luftwaffe can do, and wait a possible general election.”

 

Conclusion

 

For the Allies, Hitler’s order to halt his troops before reaching Dunkirk was an astonishingly well-timed mercy. German generals such as Heinz Guderian, Franz Halder and many others were furious with Hitler for preventing them from capturing the British soldiers at Dunkirk.[29]

 

However, Hitler’s order to halt his troops before reaching Dunkirk was not made primarily for military reasons. Hitler’s mistake was to assume that Churchill would ever enter into a peace agreement with Germany. On January 20, 1943, Joseph E. Davies disclosed that Hitler offered to retire from office if by doing so Great Britain would make peace with Germany. Churchill and other British leaders refused Hitler’s offer.[30]

 

Churchill never once attempted to make peace with Germany. In a January 1, 1944, letter to Stalin, Churchill said:[31]

 

“We never thought of peace, not even in that year when we were completely isolated and could have made peace without serious detriment to the British Empire, and extensively at your cost. Why should we think of it now, when victory approaches for the three of us?”


Endnotes

 

A version of this article was originally published in the July/August 2026 issue of The Barnes Review.

 

[1] Miracle of Dunkirk History.com https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/dunkirk.

 

[2] Ullrich, Volker, Hitler: Downfall 1939-1945, New York: Alfred A. Knoph, 2020, pp. 103f.

 

[3] Ibid., p. 104.

 

[4] Kershaw, Ian, Hitler 1936-1945: Nemesis, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000, p. 295.

 

[5] Guderian, Heinz, Panzer Leader, London: Michael Joseph Ltd., 1952, p. 120.

 

[6] Irving, David, Hitler’s War, New York: The Viking Press, 1977, p. 125.

 

[7] Irving, David, Göring: A Biography, Hammersmith, London: Grafton Books, 1991, p. 290.

 

[8] Jacobsen, Hans-Adolf, Dunkirk: German Operations in France 1940, Havertown, Penn.: Casemate Publishers, 2019, p. 194.

 

[9] Irving, David, Hitler’s War, op. cit., p. 3.

 

[10] Schultze-Rhonhof, Gerd, 1939 – The War that Had Many Fathers: The Long Run-Up to the Second World War, 6th edition, München, Germany: Olzog Verlag GmbH, 2011, p. 667.

 

[11] Menuhin, Gerard, Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2015, p. 296.

 

[12] Hart, B. H. Liddell, The Other Side of the Hill, London: Papermac, 1970, pp. 200f.; Hart, B. H. Liddell, History of the Second World War, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1970, p. 83; see also Chamberlain, William Henry, America’s Second Crusade, Chicago: Regnery, 1950, p. 76.

 

[13] Hart, B. H. Liddell, History of the Second World War, op. cit., p. 83.

 

[14] Ibid., p. 82.

 

[15] Veale, Frederick J. P., Advance to Barbarism, Newport Beach, Cal.: Institute for Historical Review, 1993, p. 332.

 

[16] Hart, B. H. Liddell, The Other Side of the Hill, op. cit., pp. 200f.

 

[17] Fraser, L. Craig, The Testament of Adolf Hitler: The Hitler-Bormann Documents, pp. 72f.

 

[18] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, Bloomington, Ind.: AuthorHouse, 2012, p. 369.

 

[19] Goldensohn, Leon, (Robert Gellately editor), The Nuremberg Interviews, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2004, p. 342.

 

[20] Von Manstein, Erich, Lost Victories, Novato, Cal.: Presidio Press, 1994, p. 124.

 

[21] Ciano, Count Galeazzo, Ciano’s Diplomatic Papers, London: Odhams Press, 1948, p. 373.

 

[22] Hinsley, F. H., Hitler’s Strategy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951, p. 81.

 

[23] Fish, Hamilton, FDR The Other Side of the Coin: How We Were Tricked into World War II, New York: Vantage Press, 1976, p. 87.

 

[24] Ferguson, Niall, Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Power Order and the Lessons of Global Power, New York: Basic, 2003, pp. 330f.

 

[25] Hitler, Adolf, My New Order, Edited with commentary by Raoul de Roussy de Sales, New York: Reynal and Hitchcock, 1941, p. 837.

 

[26] Chamberlain, William Henry, America’s Second Crusade, Chicago: Regnery, 1950, p. 84.

 

[27] Hinsley, F. H., Hitler’s Strategy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951, p. 82.

 

[28] Denman, Roy, Missed Chances: Britain and Europe in the Twentieth Century, London: Indigo, 1997, p. 130.

 

[29] Gelb, Norman, Dunkirk: The Complete Story of the First Step in the Defeat of Hitler, New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1989, pp. 129, 131.

 

[30] Walsh, Michael, The Battle for Europe: Hidden Truths About the Second World War, United Kingdom: The Historical Review Press, 2012, p. 15.

 

[31] Walendy, Udo, The Methods of Reeducation, Vlotho/Weser, Germany: Verlag für Volkstum und Zeitgeschichtsforschung, 1979, p. 3.

Tuesday, October 6, 2026

Jewish Invention Myths: The Infomercial

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-invention-myths-the-infomercial/

 

by Karl Radl

 

Another one of the ‘jewish invention’ myths propounded by Marnie Winston-Macauley’s is the claim that jews invented the bane of married men with stay-at-home wives everywhere: the infomercial.

 

Now while some would prefer to leave this one to the jews: the truth is that her claim to the infomercial having a jewish origin simply isn’t true.

 

She writes at ‘Aish’ that:

 

‘Losing a little hair on your pate? No problem for Ron “Ronco” Popeil, who invented spray-on hair — GLH-9 Hair in a Can Spray. In the 1950s, before celebs were hawking on home shopping channels, Popeil, inventor, and TV marketer supreme, saw the potential of TV to sell, sell, sell, cheaply, and in quantity. He introduced viewers to the Ronco Spray Gun, Veg-O-Matic, and Pocket Fisherman with an unscripted presentation. His products, such as Mr. Microphone, a Solid Flavor Injector, and Electric Food Dehydrator, have made over $2 billion – and kicked off a new M.O. for media selling: The infomercial!’ (1)

 

The problem is that once again even a little bit of research shows this up as utter nonsense as while Ron Popeil was an early ‘frontman’ for Infomercials – he began his career in them in 1956 – (2) they substantially predate him. Since the first true infomercial – as in a dedicated filmed-for-television segment – was ‘Home Miracles for the 1950s’ that was produced and screened in 1949 by Ray Culley – who owned and operated ‘Cinecraft Productions’ – in order to promote a new Vitamix blender that featured the founder of Vitamix’s (William Barnard Jr.) father William Barnard Sr. as the frontman (William Barnard Sr. had been a salesman since he founded his own sales in company in 1921). (3)

 

Culley’s work – along with Barnard’s fronting – became the origin point and basis for all future infomercials and Popeil was simply copying this new trend started by Culley and Barnard Snr six to seven years later.

 

So, no; jews did not invent the infomercial!

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.


References

 

(1) https://aish.com/91795029/

 

(2) https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/tv/story/2021-08-10/ron-popeil-ronco-infomercial-appreciation

 

(3) https://case.edu/ech/articles/v/vita-mix-corporation

 

via Semitic Controversies

Saturday, October 3, 2026

Jewish Invention Myths: The Digital Printing Press

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-invention-myths-the-digital-printing-press/

 

by Karl Radl

 

Another of Suzanne Downing’s ‘jewish invention’ claims is that jews invented the digital printing press the successor to traditional and computerized type setting. She claims that this was first invented by an Israeli jew named Ben Zion ‘Benny’ Landa in 1993 writing that:

 

‘Digital printing press – 1993: Revolutionary printing press invented by Benny Landa, founder of Indigo Digital Press’ (1)

 

This is also regurgitated by ‘Journalism.University’ who wrongly claim that:

 

‘And in 1993, Benny Landa developed the digital printing press, which revolutionised commercial printing by making short print runs affordable and enabling variable data printing.’ (2)

 

Both Michael Dillon (3) and Ann O’Brien (4) are better; dating the digital printing press and digital printing to around 1990 – three years before Landa is claimed to have ‘invented’ it – but don’t state who invented it.

 

The truth is that digital printing and the digital printing press was invented by an American computer programmer named David Coons in the late 1980s (5) which then inspired one of his early clients named Graham Nash – a musician by profession – to launch the digital printing company ‘Nash Editions’ between 1989 and 1991 to print material digitally and which was a very successful commercially. (6)

 

Thus, we can see that all Landa did was take an existing non-jewish invention (by Coons) and the digital printing business model (pioneered by Nash) several years after they had invented and apparently claimed their work as his own and presented himself as the ‘father of digital printing’ (7) which – as we have seen – is a complete and utter bald-faced lie.

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.


References

 

(1) https://mustreadalaska.com/beyond-uzis-and-iron-dome-75-israeli-inventions-and-four-palestinian-innovations-that-changed-the-world/

 

(2) https://journalism.university/print-media/gutenberg-digital-revolution-printing-press/

 

(3) https://meyers.com/meyers-blog/the-history-of-digital-printing-a-comprehensive-timeline/

 

(4) https://www.publishingxpress.com/blog/history-of-the-printing-press-and-how-books-got-here/

 

(5) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Coons#Digital_printing

 

(6) https://digitaljournalist.org/issue0105/nash_intro.htm

 

(7) https://www.haaretz.com/2012-06-14/ty-article/.premium/prophet-of-print-benny-landa-hopes-to-strike-nano-gold/0000017f-f797-ddde-abff-fff724c30000

Sunday, September 27, 2026

Jews and Non-Jews


„Years of observation and thought have given increasing strength to the belief that we Jews stand apart from you gentiles, that a primal duality breaks the humanity I know into two distinct parts; that this duality is a fundamental, and that all differences among you gentiles are trivialities compared with that which divided all of you from us.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 12)


„You may even have Jews in your midst who did not learn their way of life from us, and did not inherit it from a Jewish forebear. We may have authentic gentiles in our midst: these single protests are of no account; they are extreme and irrelevant variations.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 21).


„I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 23).


„You have your way of life, we ours. In your system of life we are essentially without ‘honor.’ In our system of life you are essentially without morality. In your system of life we must forever appear graceless; to us you must forever appear godless.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 34).


„According to Jewish belief, the Jewish People constitutes a species of their its own...i.e., a special, separate act of Creation by the Almighty. ‘The thought of creating the Jewish People preceded every other thought’ of the Almighty when creating the Universe according to the teaching of Rabbi Samuel bar Isaac.“ (Bereshith Rabba 1,5)


„When Germany and England and America will long have lost their present identity or purpose, we shall still be strong in ours.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 111).


„Judaism, which was destroyed politically (as a result of the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D.), went forth into the great world. It adapted its possessions to its wanderings. I once compared it to an army going to war, a ‘movable State.’

Jews were compelled to smuggle their goods across from frontier to frontier; so they chose abstract wares, easy to stubble; and this gave them ability, despite ghettos and restrictions, to enter everywhere; and so it is that the Hebrew people have penetrated everywhere.

The argument is that Judaism, by penetrating among the Gentiles (IN CHRISTIANS GUISE or otherwise), has gradually undermined the remnants of paganism. Such penetration has not been without deliberate Jewish conniving in the shape of assistance bestowed in a thousand ways, devices and disguises. It has been affected in great measure by crypto-Jews, who have permeated Christianity and spoken through the mouth of Christianity.

By these devices of their Jewish blood; and owing to an instance for ‘requital,’ they have gradually induced Christianity to accept what was left in it of pagan elements as their own; and it is they who, in principle (even though they are called by great Gentile names), of Democracy, of Socialism, and of Communism. All this achievement...has come about chiefly through unknown anonymous Jews, Jews in secret, either crypto-Jews who mingled among the Gentiles and nurtured great thinkers from among them; or, through the influence of Jews, who, in the great crises of liberty and freedom, have stood behind the scenes; or through Jewish teachers and scholars from the time of the Middle Ages.

It was disciples of Jewish teachers who headed the Protestant movements. These dogs, these haters of the Jews have a keen nose. In truth, Jewish influence in Germany is powerful. It is impossible to ignore it. Marx was a Jew. His manner of thought was Jewish. His keenness of intellect was Jewish; and one of his forebears was a most distinguished rabbi endowed with a powerful mind. The newspapers, under Jewish control, obviously served as an auxiliary in all movements in favor of freedom. Not in vain have Jews been drawn toward journalism. In their hands it became a weapon highly fitted to meet their needs...

The Gentiles have at last realized this secret, that Judaism has gradually penetrated them like a drug. The Gentile nature is in revolt, and is trying to organize the final battle. Christianity is trying to organize its last war against Judaism. And there is no doubt that this warfare...is being waged specifically against Democracy, against Socialism. This is another world wide warfare again against the forces of Judaism. I venture to think that Socialism in its highest form is the fruit of the Jewish spirit, and the fruit of the world outlook of the prophets. It is they who were the first Socialists.

War is now being waged against us {but unknown to most of Christianity. Because God’s People refuse to accept knowledge and recognize the enemy}, against Judaism, not in our own land, but in the great outer world where we are scattered. They would ‘smoke us out’ of all the cracks and crannies where we have hidden. They would exterminate us like bacilli, and be rid of us.“ (N.H. Bialik, in an address delivered at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, May 11, 1933, which appeared in Lines of Communication, Palestine, July, 1933)


„The Western mind is incapable of thinking religiously.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, a Jew, p. 185).


„The Universal Israelite Alliance...addresses itself to every type of worship. It wishes to penetrate all religions, as it has found access to all countries...Let all men of enlightenment, without distinction of sec, find a means of union in the Universal Israelite Association, whose aims are so noble, so broad, and so highly civilizing...To reach out a friendly hand to all who, although born in a different worship from ours, offer us the hand of fellowship, acknowledging that all religions which are based on morality and acknowledge God ought to be friendly towards one another: thus to destroy the barriers separating what is destined one day to be united, that is the grand supreme object of our Alliance...I summon to our Association our brethren of every form of worship. Let them come to us...Our grand mission is to put the Jewish population in touch with the authorities in every country...to make our voices heard in the cabinets of ministers and in the ears of princes, whatever be the religion that is despised, persecuted, or attacked.“ (Archives Israelites Universelle, tom. xxv, pp. 511-520 (1861). Quoted in Rev. S.J. Deschamps, Les Sociétés Secrètes et la Société, p. 24).


„For fifty years I have been a resolute partisan of assimilation of the Jews, and have believed in it. Today I confess my error. The American melting-pot will never produce the fusion of one Jew. Fifty years ago we were near to assimilating ourselves to the Americans. But since then two millions of our brother (or three) have arrived from the East, keeping their ancient traditions, bringing with them their old ideal. This army has submerged us. It is the hand of God. The Jew must differentiate himself from his neighbor; he must know it; he must be conscious of it; he must be proud of it.“ (The Jewish Chronicle, April 28, 1911, M. Schindler, an American Rabbi).


„We are hostile to strangers, guests in all countries, and at the same time we find ourselves at home in all countries when we are masters there.“ (Isaac Blumchen, Le Droit de la Race Supérieure).


„I do not intend,“ declares Herzl, „to provoke a softening of opinion in our favor. It would be idle, and would lack dignity. I am content to ask the Jews if, in the countries where we are numerous, it is true that the position of advocates, doctors, engineers, professors, and employees of all kinds, belonging to our race (people), is becoming more and more intolerable.“ (Le Droit de la Race Supérieure, Isaac Blumehen).


„[The Jews] fill in proportion, thanks to their insistence, more posts than the other communities, Catholic and Protestant. Their disastrous influence makes itself felt above all in affairs which have most weight in the fortune of the country; there is no enterprise in which the Jews have not their large share, no public loan which they do not monopolize, no disaster which they have not prepared and by which they do not profit. It is therefore, ill-considered to complain, as they always do, they who have all the favors and who make all the profits!“ (Les Juifs (1847), Cerfberr de Medelsheim; also quoted by Gougenot des Mousseaux in Le Juif, (1869).


„More than ever the study of the Jewish problem is a pressing reality, but...the Jewish question is also more than ever ‘taboo’; one must not speak of it, still less study it. At most the right to deny its existence is recognized. Those even who should be most interested in finding a solution pretend to solve the problem by abstention or silence which is considered both a sane method and a high humanitarian idea...Judaism in its origins and expansions presents an ensemble of sentiments, notions, and ideas which are the source of veritable systems, religious, political and social; one has the right to discuss and contest these systems.“ (Le Problème Juic, (1921), Georges Batault).


„The dispersion of the Jews has rendered them a cosmopolitan people. They are the only cosmopolitan people, and in this capacity must act, and are acting, as a solvent of national and racial differences. The great Ideal of Judaism is not that Jews shall be allowed to flock together one day in some hole-and-corner fashion, for, if not tribal, at any rate separatist objects; but that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a Universal Brotherhood of Nations, a great Judaism, in fact, all the separate races and religions shall disappear...The new Constitution of the [Jewish] Board of Deputies marks an epoch in the history of that important institution...The real importance of the new Constitution is...that it provides a machinery for enabling the Jews of England to work together when the occasion requires, that in short it organizes the Jews of the whole Empire, and renders their aggregate force available in cases of emergency.“ (Jewish World, February 9 and 16, 1883).


„...We aspire to corrupt in order to attain to govern...We have corrupted too much...I begin to fear that we will not be able to stem the torrent we have let loose. There are insatiable passions of which I did not guess, unknown appetites, savage hatreds which ferment around and under us...It has been very easy to pervert; will it also always be easy to muzzle the perverts?...I am disturbed, for I am getting old, I have lost my illusions, I do not wish, poor and deluded of everything to assist as a theatrical supernumerary in the triumph which I have created and which would repudiate me by confiscating my fortune and taking off my head. We have gone too much to the extreme in many things. We have taken from the people all the gods of heaven and earth which had their homage. We have torn from them their religious faith, their faith in monarchy, their honesty and their family virtues, and we hear in the distance their sinister roarings. We tremble, for the monster may devour us...The world is cinched on the declivity of democracy, and for some time for me democracy has meant demagogy.

 „It is true that there is a distinct ‘Jewish idea’ in business and professional life which has eaten away the traditional principles of honor on which Anglo-Saxon life was erected. Every Jew knows that, every non-Jew knows it...It is true that beneath all the network of trivializing influences in literature, art, politics, economics, fashion, and sports, is Jewish influence controlled by Jewish groups. Their Orientalism has served as a subtle poison to dry up the sound serum of Anglo-Saxon morality on which this country thrived in its formative years.“ (The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem, Vol. IV, pp. 224-225).


„...the original mixed ancestry of the Jews and their subsequent history of intermixture with every people among whom they have lived and continue to live...“ (Ashley Montagu, Man’s Most Dangerous Myth, (1974) , p. 375).


„The word ‘ghetto’ is synonymous with the Jews: ‘ghetto, section of a city in which Jews lived. In the early Middle Ages their segregation in separate streets or localities was voluntary...The reason generally given for compulsory ghettos was that the faith of Christians would be weakened by the presence of Jews. Within the ghetto the inhabitants were usually autonomous, with their own courts of law and their own culture.“ (The Columbia Encyclopedia, 2nd Ed., (1950), p. 772).


„London became after Waterloo the money market and the clearing house of the world ...Every new economic enterprise of the British state appealed to the Jewish genius for commerce and especially for negotiation in its most abstract form - finance...The two things dovetailed one into the other and fitted exactly, and all subsidiary activities fitted in as well. The Jewish news agencies of the nineteenth century favored England in all her policy, political as well as commercial; they opposed those of her rivals and especially of her enemies. The Jewish knowledge of the East was at the service of England (Opium Wars, Indian Conquest). His international penetration of the European governments was also at her service, so was his secret information...The Jew might almost be called a British agent upon the Continent of Europe and still more in the Near and Far East...He was admitted to every institution in the State, a prominent member of his nation became chief officer of the English executive, and, an influence more subtle and penetrating, marriages began to take place, wholesale, between what had once been the aristocratic territorial families of this country and the Jewish commercial fortunes. After two generations of this, with the opening of the twentieth century those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception. In nearly all of them was the stain more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English name and the tradition those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family were taken for Jews whenever they travelled in countries where the gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed the admixture.“ (Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, pp. 222-223)


„There are two life-forces in the world I know: Jewish and gentile (non-Jewish), ours and yours...I do not believe that this primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York, 1924, pp. 19, 23).


„...don’t kill the farmer, he’s too valuable to us.“ (Jewish Motto).


„We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.“ (Goldwin Smith, Jewish Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, October, 1981)


„We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.“ (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).


„But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim.“ (Statement reported in a French Newspaper in 1773 after a meeting in the Rothschild home).


In an article by the Jew Victor Berger, one of the national leaders of the Socialist Party, wrote, in the Social Democratic Herald: „There can be no doubt that the Negroes and Mulattos constitute a lower race.“


Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels said Blacks: „...were people who ought to be eradicated and swept from the earth.“ (Karl Marx, by Nathaniel Weyl).


„Jews may adopt the customs and language of the countries where they live; but they will never become part of the native population.“ (The Jewish Courier, January 17, 1924).


„We are neither German, English or French. We are Jews and your Christian mentality is not ours.“ (Max Nordrow, a German Zionist Leader, in The Jewish World)


„The chief difficulty in writing about the Jewish Question is the super-sensitiveness of Jews and non-Jews concerning the whole matter. There is a vague feeling that even to openly use the word ‘Jew,’ or expose it nakedly to print is somehow improper. Polite evasions like ‘Hebrew’ and ‘Semite,’ both of which are subject to the criticism of inaccuracy, are timidly essayed, and people pick their way gingerly as if the whole subject were forbidden, until some courageous Jewish thinker comes straight out with the old old word ‘Jew,’ and then the constraint is relieved and the air cleared...A Jew is a Jew and as long as he remains within his perfectly unassailable traditions, he will remain a Jew. And he will always have the right to feel that to be a Jew, is to belong to a superior race. No one knows better than the Jew how widespread the notion that Jewish methods of business are all unscrupulous. No existing Gentile system of government is ever anything but distasteful to him. The Jew is against the Gentile scheme of things.

He is, when he gives his tendencies full sway, a Republican as against the monarchy, a Socialist as against the republic, and a Bolshevik as against Socialism. Democracy is all right for the rest of the world, but the Jew wherever he is found forms an aristocracy of one sort or another.“ (Henry Ford, Dearborn Independent)


„We are interested in just the opposite...in the diminution, the killing out of the Goyim.“ (Reportedly spoken by a Jewish speaker in the Rothschild home in 1773)


„We intend to remake the Gentiles -- what the Communists are doing in Russia.“ (Rabbi Lewish Brown in How Odd of God, New York, 1924)


„Let us recognize that we Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, or shade of belief, is necessarily a member. Organize, organize, until every Jew must stand up and be counted with us, or prove himself wittingly or unwittingly, of the few who are against their own people.“ (Louis B. Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1916-1939)


„I would willingly disenfranchise every Zionist. I would almost be tempted to proscribe the Zionist organizations as illegal and against the national interests...I have always recognized the unpopularity, much greater than some people think of my community. We [Jews] have obtained a far greater share of this country’s [England] goods and opportunities than we are numerically entitled to. We reach, on the whole, maturity earlier, and therefore with people of our own age we compete unfairly. Many of us have been exclusive in our friendships, and intolerable in our attitude, and I can easily understand that many a non-Jew in England wants to get rid of us.“ (Jewish-American Ambassador to India, Edwin Montague, The Zionist Connection, p. 737)


„You cannot be English Jews. We are a race, and only as a race can we perpetuate. Our mentality is of Edomitish character, and differs from that of an Englishman. Enough subterfuges! Let us assert openly that we are International Jews.“ (From the manifesto of the „World Jewish Federation,“ January 1, 1935, through its spokesperson, Gerald Soman).


„No one pretends that a Japanese or Indian child is English because it was born in England. The same applies to Jews.“ (Jewish World, London September 22, 1915)


„A Jew remains a Jew. Assimilalation is impossible, because a Jew cannot change his national character. Whatever he does, he is a Jew and remains a Jew. The majority has discovered this fact, but too late. Jews and Gentiles discover that there is no issue. Both believed there was an issue. There is none.“ (The Jews, Ludwig Lewisohn, in his book „Israel,“ 1926)


„When some Jews say that they consider themselves as a religious sect, like Roman Catholics or Protestants, they do not analyze correctly their own attitude and sentiments...Even if a Jew is baptized or, that which is not necessarily the same thing, sincerely converted to Christianity, it is rare if he is not still regarded as a Jew; his blood, his temperament and his spiritual particularities remain unchanged.“ (The Jew and the Nation, Ad. Lewis, the Zionist Association of West London; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 187)


„An energetic, lively and extremely haughty people, considering itself superior to all other nations, the Jewish race wished to be a Power. It had an instinctive taste for domination, since, by its origin, by its religion, by its quality of a chosen people which it had always attributed to itself [since the Babylonian Captivity], it believed itself placed above all others. To exercise this sort of authority the Jews had not a choice of means, gold gave them a power which all political and religious laws refuse them, and it was the only power which they could hope for. By holding this gold they became the masters of their masters, they dominated them and this was the only way of finding an outlet for their energy and their activity...The emancipated Jews entered into the nations as strangers...They entered into modern societies not as guests but as conquerors. They had been like a fenced-in herd. Suddenly the barriers fell and they rushed into the field which was opened to them. But they were not warriors...They made the only conquest for which they were armed, that economic conquest for which they had been preparing themselves for so many years...The Jew is the living testimony to the disappearance of the state which had as its basis theological principles, a State which anti-Semitic Christians dream of reconstructing. The day when a Jew occupied an administrative post the Christian State was in danger: that is true and the anti-smites who say that the Jew has destroyed the idea of the state could more justly say that the entry of Jews into society has symbolized the destruction of the state, that is to say the Christian State.“ (Bernard Lazare, L’Antisémitisme, pp. 223, 361; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 221-222)


„The most important and pregnant tenet of modern Jewish belief is that the Ger {goy - goyim}, or stranger, in fact all those who do not belong to their religion, are brute beasts, having no more rights than the fauna of the field.“ (Sir Richard Burton, The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam, p. 73)


„Jew and Gentile are two worlds, between you Gentiles and us Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf...There are two life forces in the world Jewish and Gentile...I do not believe that this primal difference between Gentile and Jew is reconcilable...The difference between us is abysmal...You might say: ‘Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.’ But the misfortune is that the two are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, pages 2, 19, 23, 30 and 95)


„The Jewish people, Rabbi Judah Halevy (the famous medieval poet and philosopher) explains in his ‘Kuzari,’ constitutes a separate entity, a species unique in Creation, differing from nations in the same manner as man differs from the beast or the beast from the plant...although Jews are physically similar to all other men, yet they are endowed [sic] with a ‘second soul’ that renders them a separate species.“ (Zimmer, Uriel, Torah- Judaism and the State of Israel, Congregation Kehillath Yaakov, Inc., NY, 5732 (1972), p. 12)


Actually it seems to serve their twisted purpose! The basis of this belief is All non Jews are subhuman and are to be exploited (milked or beeved). When these folks get Irate and try to fight back they naturally see the enemy as being all „Jews“ and not merely their Corrupt leaders.. Thus these leaders would use IaHUeH’s people as a shield to further their wicked ends. When attacked, the people tend to stick closer together.. According to what they are told to believe for a non-jew to confront a Jew is like Blasphemy... this makes it harder to Isolate the very Serious problem! It turns into a vicious cycle of destruction. And has caused the unnecessary Suffering and Death to Millions upon Millions of People...all for the benefit of a few.

It seems that the only effective Solution must come from the „Jewish“ people themselves.. but they still aren’t listening.. because they are told that whenever someone even so much as mentions „Multi-national Banker“ that it is because that person is an anti-semite and wants to Murder all „Jews“ everywhere! I wonder how many millions of dollars have been spent by the ADL to keep people from talking bad about these „Multi-National (Power hungry, moneygrabbing, slimball, Lying, Thieving, Murderous, Sons of Belial) Bankers“!!!

 ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937: „There is nothing else in Communism - a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a „paradise on earth.“

Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and what it means. It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is - a Jewish scheme invented by Jews - that it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string-puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews.“

The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht ...(„not wanted.“) „I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish...“


„The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability.“ (Minority Report: H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks)