The Secret Masonic Victory of WW2 - Part 19 - Why did the NS leadership believe Jesus was not Jewish?

New Documentary: The Holocaust – Proven at Nuremberg?

 

Source: https://codoh.com/library/document/new-documentary-the-holocaust-proven-at-nuremberg/

 

by Germar Rudolf

September 12, 2025

 

Germar Rudolf, The Holocaust – Proven at Nuremberg? Reviewing the Evidence Presented at the International Military Tribunal, documentary published by Armreg Ltd, London, September 2025, 1 hr 11 min. 37sec.

 

Late last year, Jake Shields had me over in Las Vegas for a debate with mainstream historian Prof. Dr. Michael Vann. It was then that I realized that we revisionist do not have any resource which succinctly lays out revisionist arguments why the findings of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal of 1945/46 cannot be regarded as a reliable, trustworthy historical source for any claims made during these proceedings. So, I sat down and wrote a book about it – which is about to be released in its second edition – and roughly a month ago, when having some breathing room from other projects, I tackled the challenge to turn the essence of this book into a documentary.

The 16-th Martyrs of November 9th, 1923

 

At half-past twelve in the afternoon of November 9th, 1923, those whose names are given below fell in front of the Feldherrnhalle and in the forecourt of the former War Ministry in Munich for their loyal faith in the resurrection of their people:

 

Alfarth, Felix, Merchant, born July 5th, 1901

Bauriedl, Andreas, Hatmaker, born May 4th, 1879

Casella, Theodor, Bank Official, born August 8th, 1900

Ehrlich, Wilhelm, Bank Official, born August 19th, 1894

Faust, Martin, Bank Official, born January 27th, 1901

Hechenberger, Anton, Locksmith, born September 28th, 1902

Koerner, Oskar, Merchant, born January 4th, 1875

Kuhn, Karl, Head Waiter, born July 25th, 1897

Laforce, Karl, Student of Engineering, born October 28th, 1904

Neubauer, Kurt, Waiter, born March 27th, 1899

Pape, Claus von, Merchant, born August 16th, 1904

Pfordten, Theodor von der, Councillor to the Superior Provincial Court, born May 14th, 1873

Rickmers, Johann, retired Cavalry Captain, born May 7th, 1881

Scheubner-Richter, Max Erwin von, Dr. of Engineering, born January 9th, 1884

Stransky, Lorenz Ritter von, Engineer, born March 14th, 1899

Wolf, Wilhelm, Merchant, born October 19th, 1898

 

So-called national officials refused to allow the dead heroes a common burial. So I dedicate the first volume of this work to them as a common memorial, that the memory of those martyrs may be a permanent source of light for the followers of our Movement.

 

The Fortress, Landsberg am Lech,
October 16th, 1924

Adolf Hitler

Jewish Invention Myths: The Discovery and Isolation of the Bacteria that Causes Tetanus (Clostridium tetani)

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-invention-myths-the-discovery-and-isolation-of-the-bacteria-that-causes-tetanus-clostridium-tetani/

 

by Karl Radl

 

One of the ‘jewish inventions’ that I found cited in Arnold Zweig’s book ‘Insulted and Exiled’ is one that I haven’t seen anywhere else but still needs to be addressed.

 

Zweig writes as follows lauding ‘jewish achievement’:

 

‘Rosenbach was the first to recognise the tetanus bacillus.’ (1)

 

Now once again it took me a little while to work out who Zweig is referring to here, but he is referring to the nineteenth century German doctor named Ottomar Rosenbach from Krappitz in Silesia who was indeed jewish. (2)

 

However, Rosenbach didn’t discover or isolate the tetanus bacteria at all, but rather he worked on the aspects of the blood-borne disease tetanus (3) after the disease’s toxin had been isolated by the German doctor Arthur Nicolaier – who was actually jewish – in 1884 although he shares that credit independently with two Italian physiologists Antonio Carle and Giorgio Rattone who did achieved similar findings and also identified the transmission matrix for tetanus. (4) Although the disease had been known about since at least the fifth century B.C. so neither Nicolaier, Carle nor Rattone can be really credited with its discovery. (5)

 

The person who actually isolated the bacteria that causes tetanus (Clostridium tetani) was Baron Kitasato Shibasaburo of Japan while studying at the University of Berlin in 1889 (6) and in 1890 with the German physiologist Emil von Behring came up with the first treatment for tetanus based on his work.

 

Thus, we can see that Zweig is quite wrong in that jews certainly did not discover tetanus nor the bacteria that causes tetanus.

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.

---

References

 

(1) Arnold Zweig, 1937, ‘Insulted and Exiled: The Truth about the German Jews’, 1^st Edition, John Miles: London, p. 152

 

(2) https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/12837-rosenbach-ottomar-ernst-felix

 

(3) https://www.indianpediatrics.net/oct2015/oct-881-882.htm; N. Y. Academy of Medicine – Acute Traumatic Tetanus – Cerebral Syphilis – New Hospitals – Extra-uterine Foetus Delivered through the Rectum, 1889, ‘Letter from New York’, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 12, No. 2, p. 65

 

(4) https://web.archive.org/web/20150213010501/http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/tetanus.html

 

(5) Ibid.

 

(6) https://web.archive.org/web/20150213010501/http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/tetanus.html

 

(7) W. F. Bynum, 2007, ‘Derek S. Linton’s ‘Emil von Behring: Infectious Disease, Immunology, Serum Therapy’’, The American Historical Review, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 605–606

 

via Karl Radl’s Substack

Jewish Invention Myths: Public Health Nursing

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-invention-myths-public-health-nursing/

 

by Karl Radl

 

Another ‘jewish invention’ myth that gets bandied about a fair amount is the claim that jews originated the concept of ‘Public Health Nursing’ – basically nurses getting out into the community to offer basic medical advice and help as well as try to engage in preventative medicine – with the claim being that it was created by the jewess Lillian Wald in 1893 in New York City. (1)

 

The usual story is well explained by the University of Pennsylvania when we read on their website how in 1895:

 

‘Lillian Wald establishes the Henry Street Settlement House in New York City

 

Wald’s insistence that sickness should be considered in its social and economic context led to innovative and pragmatic reforms in health care, industry, education, recreation, and housing. She coined the term public health nurse and originated the ideas that eventually led to the establishment of the Children’s Bureau, the provision of school nurses in primary and secondary schools, insurance coverage for home care, and the first national nursing service: the Red Cross Town and Country Nursing Service.’ (2)

 

This was then preceded by Wald and her non-jewish friend and fellow nurse Mary Brewster setting up the ‘Visiting Nurse Service’ in 1893 which Wald styled ‘public health nursing’. (3)

 

This seems solid until we realise that while Wald was the first person to call what she and Brewster were doing ‘public health nursing’; they were most certainly not the first people to be doing it.

 

For example, the ‘New York Mission and Tract Society’ had been doing home evangelization visits in the city since the 1830s, (4) but in 1877 they added in what amounts to public health nursing as part of their evangelization campaign to the poor and the destitute across the cites of Boston, Buffalo, Chicago, Philadelphia and New York as the University of Pennsylvania also explains:

 

‘Women’s Branch of the New York Mission and Tract Society sends the first trained nurses into the homes of the poor to care for the sick

 

These missionary nurses were followed in the 1880s by visiting nurses sponsored by organizations in Buffalo, Boston, Philadelphia, and Chicago. By 1909, there were nearly 600 visiting nurse organizations across the country to save the poor from illness.’ (5)

 

Now this means that nursing of the kind later proposed and performed by Brewster and Wald was in fact already being done circa sixteen years before they started their own work in 1893 and the only thing that Wald actually ‘invented’ was the term ‘public health nursing’ in order to describe this already extant profession!

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.

---

References

 

(1) https://www.reddit.com/r/Jewish/comments/18q24ls/what_are_some_things_that_were_invented_by_jews/

 

(2) https://www.nursing.upenn.edu/nhhc/nursing-through-time/1870-1899/

 

(3) https://jwa.org/womenofvalor/wald

 

(4) https://www.britannica.com/topic/New-York-City-Mission-and-Tract-Society

 

(5) https://www.nursing.upenn.edu/nhhc/nursing-through-time/1870-1899/

 

via Karl Radl’s Substack

The True and Only Nature of the Jew!

Adolf Hitler About the Peasant New Nobility

There is no rise, which does not begin at the root of national, folkish and economic life, the peasant.

Speech of May 1, 1933 in Berlin

---

Salvation of the peasantry means salvation of the German nation.

„Adolf Hitler’s Program”, appeal for the election of July 31, 1932

---

The last decision over the success or failure of our work depends on the success of the salvation of the peasantry.

Speech of October 2, 1933 in Hameln

---

All fluctuations are in the end bearable, all blows of fate can be overcome, if a healthy peasantry is present.

Speech of April 5, 1933 in Berlin

---

The destruction of this peasantry in our folk would lead to the most severe consequences thinkable. The restoration of the profitability of agricultural enterprises may be difficult for the consumer. But the fate, which would strike the whole German folk, if the German peasant was ruined, would not be comparable to these difficulties.

Speech of March 23, 1933 in Berlin

---

We were convinced that the salvation of the German folk must proceed from the salvation of the peasantry. For if any other person must leave his work place or himself loses his business, he can one day find a new place again, found a new business through industriousness and ability; the peasant, however, who has once lost his farm, is usually lost forever. But woe, if this stratum is destroyed in a folk! One can more easily master any distress, but one alone can destroy a folk: When the daily bread is lacking, all experiments and theories stop!

Speech of March 21, 1934 in Unterhaching

---

Any government, which overlooks the significance of such a supportive fundament (the peasantry), can only be a government for the moment. It can indeed rule and administer for a few years, but it will never achieve long-term or even eternal successes.

Speech of April 5, 1933 in Berlin

---

While I fight for the German future, I must for German soil and must fight for the German peasant. He gives us the people in the cities. He has been the eternal spring for millennia, and he must be preserved!

Speech of February 10, 1930 in Berlin

---

It was necessary for the salvation of the peasantry facing total ruin to take trade and price policy measures, through law, however, to again give the peasant a strong and indestructible support.

Speech of January 30, 1934 in Berlin

---

The salvation of German peasantry through safeguarding the German farm.

Speech of May 1, 1934 in Berlin

---

Tremendous sums of millions will serve to reduce payments as well as lower agricultural land tax.

Speech of March 21, 1934 in Unterhaching

---

Every billion, which, instead of going to a foreign country, flows to the German peasant, as a result gives five or six billion in salaries and wages, which benefit the German worker.

„Adolf Hitler’s Program”, appeal for the election of July 31, 1932

---

As long as a folk can pull back to a strong peasantry, it will again and again draw new strength from it.

Speech of April 5, 1933 in Berlin

---

I see... in the preservation and promotion of a healthy peasantry the best protection against social ills as well as against the racial degeneration of our folk.

„Adolf Hitler’s Program’’, appeal for the election of July 31, 1932

---

When I look across all the economic individual manifestations of the time, across all the political fluctuations, at the end always essentially remains the question of the preservation of the folkdom in itself. It will only be able to be favorably answered, if the problem of the preservation of the peasantry is solved.

Speech of April 5, 1933 in Berlin

---

The first and deepest representative of the folk... is that portion, which from the fertility of the earth feeds the people and from the fertility of the family propagates the nation. Just as liberalism and democratic Marxism denied the peasant, so does the National Socialist revolution consciously affirm it as the most secure bearer of the present, the sole guarantor for the future.

Speech of October 2, 1933 in Hameln

---

If a government already fights for the preservation of the German folkdom and thus also for the preservation of the German peasant, then precisely this German folkdom must unconditionally affirm the wants and the deeds of the government.

Speech of April 5, 1933 in Berlin

---

My German peasants!.. .You must not only be the stratum of nourishers, rather you must also be the stratum of will in the German lands!

Speech of October 2, 1933 in Hameln

---

I believe...that this government, while is sees its mission in the preservation of the German folkdom, which is in turn dependent in its interests on the preservation of the German peasant, will never make wrong decisions. It can perhaps here or there err in its means, but it will never do in the principle things.

Speech of April 5, 1933 in Berlin

---