Saturday, September 12, 2026

Jewish Losses During World War II

Source: https://codoh.com/library/document/jewish-losses-during-world-war-ii/

 

On the dispute between Giuseppe Fallisi and Vincent Reynouard

Last updated on September 2, 2026

 

On August 7, 2026, French revisionist Vincent Reynouard posted a video titled “The Number of Jews Who Disappeared between 1941 and 1945. A Response to my Accusers” (“Nombre de juifs disparus entre 1941 et 1945. Réponse à mes accusateurs”). In it, Reynouard discusses the Jewish death toll during the time of the alleged Holocaust, while also addressing accusation made against him by some critics, foremost among them Italian activist Guiseppe Fallisi. In the following text, Italian revisionist Carlo Mattogno discusses Reynouard’s presentation on Jewish wartime population statistics.

 

I state that I express my point of view on the issue on the express invitation of the manager of Andrea Carancini’s Blog.

 

First of all, it should be made clear that considering Reynouard a sort of “traitor” passed to the “enemy,” as Fallisi seems to have done, is frankly ridiculous. On the contrary, he should be praised and thanked for the enormous revisionist work he has produced, and in particular for the excellent, well-documented compendium SHOAH: Une synthèse après trente ans de travaux, published by him in PDF and also as a documentary, which is essentially dedicated to the demolition of the history of “extermination camps” and “gas chambers”, drawing on all the best revisionist literature available and on his own research.

 

Chart on Jewish population statistics, taken from V. Reynouard’s ebook SHOAH: Une synthèse après trente ans de travaux, p. 223.

 

The question of the “Jewish Victims of the Shoah”, which is summarized in a graph on p. 223 of his book, is in my opinion completely marginal, because – in principle – even if the number of victims were really 6 million, this would not automatically demonstrate the reality of a planned extermination plan and implemented in gas chambers. This is also explained clearly by Reynouard:

 

“’The missing 6 million in 1945 demonstrate the existence of this plan [of extermination].’ We answer: ‘No, this estimate has no relationship with reality. Between one and three million Jews died in the camps, ghettos and the East because of the Germans. The question is: have they been massacred within the framework of a systematic extermination plan, or have they been victims of circumstances related, in one way or another, to war?” (p. 228)

 

Mr Reynouard proposed the following ‘General budget (very approximate)’ of Jewish losses:

 

“– 8 million pre-war Jews in what was to be the German sphere of influence
– survivors in 1945: between 3.5 and 5 million;
– disappeared: between 3 and 4.5 million” (p. 223)

 

Much can be discussed about the distribution of these victims that appears in the above chart, and I will do so at the end of this article, but that is not the problem. The important fact is that the chart is based on a statistical study by Germar Rudolf[1] that comes precisely to the following conclusion:[2]

 

“According to our calculations, 3.46 to 5 million of them [Jews] survived the ‘Holocaust,’ and 3.1 to 4.64 million did not.”

 

He also stated:[3]

 

Consequently, the number of possible real Holocaust victims – according to official data provided by Israel – is probably less than 3 or even 2 million Jews.”

 

Reynouard distinguishes between the Shoah on the one hand, which for him is the catastrophe that Jews suffered during World War II, in practice their persecution, and the Holocaust on the other hand, which is to be understood as the claimed systematic and planned extermination.

 

In my opinion, in a possible statistic, it would be necessary to introduce the categories of “died” (for whatever cause), “murdered” and “disappeared,” all of which fall into the general category of “losses.”

 

For example, the victims of the concentration camps and ghettos fall into the category of those who simply “died,” while victims of the Einsatzgruppen were “murdered,” and deportees who passed through the camps of Action Reinhard and Chełmno have “disappeared.” In my book “The “Operation Reinhardt” Camps Treblinka, Sobibór, Bełżec: Black Propaganda, Archeological Research, Expected Material Evidence” (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, UK, 2021), I explained and demonstrated in abundance why they cannot be considered “murdered.”

 

All assessments of Jewish losses inevitably start from two data: the number of Jews present in what was to become National Socialist-occupied Europe in the pre-war (1939) and the post-war period (1945). However, these numbers are not as certain as is believed. The result of these calculations varies according to the sources used. This is striking that, for Gerald Reitlinger, Jewish losses range from a minimum of 4,194,200 to a maximum of 4,581,000,[4] while Raul Hilberg wrote about 5,100,000.[5]

 

According to Danuta Dąbrowska, Stanisław Waszak, Henryk Grynberg, 2,642,000 Jews lived in Poland in 1939; Peter-Heinz Seraphim indicated the figure of 2,719,000; Eugene Kulisher and Malcolm Proudfoot relied on that of 2,845,000;[6] Hilberg preferred the figure of 3,351,000.[7] Already these data involve a maximum difference of 709,000 people, who can be considered or not “victims” depending on the choice of the sources you adopt.

 

Regarding the losses related to Poland and the Soviet Union, Wolfgang Benz, who assumes 2,700,000 deaths for the former and 2,100,000 for the latter, recalls in the introductory paragraph “Realistic Assessments” of the book he coordinated[8] that the relative minimum and maximum figures adduced by G. Reitlinger and the Yad Vashem Institute are 2,350,000-2,600,000 and 1,211,500-1,316,500, respectively, with a minimum difference of 883,500 and a maximum of 1,238,500, which, even in this case, may or may not be considered victims. These great differences depend simply on the numerical data of departure chosen and the methods adopted.

 

The problem of the number of survivors in 1945 is even more complicated. First of all, the mythical-symbolic character of the 6-million victims should be kept in mind, as was well-documented by Thomas Dalton, who turned his attention to multiple articles published by the New York Times from 1869 to 1938, according to which the Jews of Central and Eastern Europe, invariably 6 million, always appeared threatened with extermination by hunger and disease.[9]

 

On June 25, 1940, the New York Times reported the following statement by Nahum Goldmann, President of the World Jewish Congress:[10]

 

“Six million Jews in Europe are condemned to destruction if the victory of the Nazis were to be final.”

 

This figure was repeated by Jewish propaganda throughout the war. Reynouard refers to articles of newspapers of November 1944 that informed about the publication of the Soviet Black Book, in which the figure of 6 million was consecrated (p. 218). Post-war statistics were compiled to “prove” this propaganda assumption. No statistician dared to explicitly cite the figure of 6 million victims – this would have been too brazen! ‒ but everyone approached it with considerable approximation.

 

The statistics relating to surviving Jews in the post-war period, even assuming very charitably that they were not rigged for the above reason, cannot be trusted.

 

In the article “Losses of the Jewish Population in the German Sphere of Influence during World War II,”[11] Jürgen Graf, commenting on Germar Rudolf’s above-mentioned study, put forward compelling arguments on this point:

 

“Benz’s basic assumption is that every Jew who no longer lived in 1945 in the place where s/he had lived until 1939 was murdered by the Germans.”

 

The specialists Benz coordinated did not take into account the territorial changes that occurred after the end of the Second World War. The most important cases, Graf continues, are those of Poland, Hungary and Romania:

 

“Poland lost its eastern provinces, where Jews had been particularly numerous, in favor of the Soviet Union. In return, it acquired vast German territories in the West, where few Jews lived before the war.

 

Hungary acquired Romanian, Czechoslovak and Yugoslav territories, only to lose them again in 1945. Romania was forced in 1940 to cede Bessarabia to the Soviet Union. Now, Jews who lived in these respective areas and who died during the war, really or presumably, are counted by Benz twice. Thus, 100,000 Jews from Bessarabia who, according to Benz, were exterminated by the Germans and their Romanian allies, appear twice in the statistics of the victims.

 

G. Rudolf showed that this double count yielded about 533,000 fictitious victims.

 

But the problem also concerns the survivors, as is clearly evident from the method used to determine their numbers.

 

In France, those who showed up in 1945 at the Ministry of Former Fighters were considered survivors.[12] In Poland, the general list of Jewish survivors was compiled on 15 June 1945 by the Centralny Komitet ͐Żydów Polskich (Central Committee of Polish Jews).[13] It is clear that, in order to be registered, they too had to present themselves to some ministry. And it can be considered well founded that such a practice was customary throughout Europe. But how many survivors preferred not to return to their country of origin? And how many preferred not to go and declare that they were alive?

 

Among the approximately 75,700 Jews deported from France, about 26,300 were Polish, 7,000 Germans, 4,500 Russians, 3,300 Romanians, 2,500 Austrians, 1,200 Hungarians:[14] can you imagine that the survivors of the deportations in 1945 rushed to return to France to be declared alive by the competent ministry?

 

And the surviving Polish Jews of Galicia (where Lwów/Lemberg is located), which was incorporated into the Soviet Union, went to Warsaw to be registered as being alive?

 

The changes in religion or identity of survivors, which applies in particular to the Soviet Union, should also be considered. As J. Graf found:

 

“According to the 1939 census, there were 3.02 million Jews in the Soviet Union. The first post-war census, which took place in 1959, provided a figure of just 2.26 million Jews, but all Western Zionists agree that this figure was unrealistically low. According to Soviet practice, every citizen could choose for himself which nationality to belong to, and a considerable part of Soviet Jews was already assimilated: they considered themselves as Russians, Ukrainians etc. Moreover, at that time, the political atmosphere was not particularly favorable to Jews, so many of them preferred not to be identified as such.”

 

To this is added the emigration of the immediate post-war period, especially to Palestine, the countries of Latin America, the United States and other English-speaking countries.

 

In this regard, J. Graf mentions an emblematic case:

 

“A short article that appeared on November 24, 1978 in an American newspaper The State Time (Baton Rouge, Louisiana), illustrates better than long and complicated statistics what really happened to the missing Jews:

 

‘The Steinbergs once lived in a small village in Poland. This was before the camps of Hitler’s death. Now more than 200 survivors dispersed to the world and their descendants are gathered here to share a special four-day celebration that appropriately began Thanksgiving. Relatives came Thursday from Canada, France, England, Argentina, Colombia, Israel and at least 13 U.S. cities. ‘It’s fabulous,’ said Iris Krasnow of Chicago. ‘There are five generations here – from three months of age to 85. People are celebrating and having a wonderful time. It’s almost like a World War II refugee meeting.’’”

 

To conclude, the statistics relating to Jews in 1939 are somewhat dubious, while those relating to 1945 are extremely dubious; therefore, any statistics based on this comparative method are rather unreliable.

 

Returning to Reynouard, while his absolute numbers were taken from Germar Rudolf, their breakdown is conjectural and moreover unfounded. Reynouard proposes a lower estimate of 3 million victims, and an upper one of 4 and a half million. The victims are divided into 6 identical categories, plus a seventh (1,500,000 victims), which applies only to the upper estimate and concerns “Disappeared in the East… in camps and ghettos, in pogroms…” It is unclear where this figure comes from and why he excluded it from the lower estimate.

 

The other 6 categories are:

 

1) “in the hands of the Soviets: about 1 million”. Even here it is not known where this figure comes from and what it means: how and why did these Jews die? In this regard, consider the following observation of the commander of the Einsatzgruppe C in the “Ereignismeldung” (event report) No. 81 of 12 September 1941:[15]

 

“While in the first weeks there were still Jews in large numbers, in the territories of central and eastern Ukraine it was possible to see that in many cases 70-90% of the Jewish population had fled, in some cases 100%. In this we can see an indirect result of the work of the Security Police, since the gratuitous expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Jews – for the most part, according to interrogations, beyond the Urals – represents a considerable contribution to the solution of the Jewish question in Europe.”

 

But Soviet territories were also the destination of the Jews who passed through the transit camps (see below, Point 4), more than 1,400,000 of them, so the number of Jews who passed alive “in the hands of the Soviets” should be around 2 million.

 

2) “Einsatzgruppen: 400,000.” Reynouard practically rounds up the proposed figure of Siegfried Verbeke (387,000, p. 439), but also reports my count in my study on the Einsatzgruppen: 727,871 victims, of which 274,149 are recorded in the reports without indication of place and date; from this, rounding the digits, he calculates the number of 750,000 – 270,000 = 480,000 victims, which would confirm the Verbeke’s figure (p. 443).

 

In my study, when discussing the above figure of 727,871, I stated:

 

“The unverifiable data are therefore 40.7% of the total figure! To these problems is added that of the exaggerations, because, even if the executions are reported with precise date and place, in most cases there is no certainty that the figures indicated are accurate.”

 

For this reason, I concluded, “the only way to assess the reliability of the figures in the Ereignismeldungen [the Einsatzgruppen‘s event reports] remains the examination of the findings of corpses and/or their destruction in the framework of the so-called ‘Aktion 1005,’”[16] a theme to which I have dedicated a special volume, in which I have examined in detail the alleged activity of all the “Sonderkommandos” of the alleged “Aktion 1005” (the exhumation of bodies from mass graves and their cremation on open-air pyres), eyewitness accounts, Soviet reports and photographic evidence, and I have come to the following conclusion (Point 4):[17]

 

“Between the figures of the executions proclaimed in the various German reports and the number of corpses actually found [and supposedly cremated] there is such an immense disproportion that it can reasonably be considered that they are far exaggerated.”

 

A report dated September 12, 1941 clearly shows that the Einsatzgruppen did not have as their main task the killing all the Jews they encountered, so the numerical exaggerations in these reports cannot be due to their eagerness to appear before their Berlin superiors as particularly efficient exterminators.

 

3) “Miscellaneous reasons (combats casualties, bombings, hostages…): 700,000.” This figure is disproportionate. According to the Yad Vashem Institute, about 240,000 Jewish soldiers died in battle, about 200,000 of them within the Red Army,[18] so it is not realistic to hypothesize 460,000 victims for bombing and hostage killings.

 

4) “Transit camps: 300,000.” For Reynouard, the camps of Bełżec, Sobibór, Treblinka and Chełmno were transit camps. Here the only toehold could be mainstream Holocaust historian Dieter Pohl, according to whom up to 5% of the deportees could die of hardship during the journey.[19] Since some 1,420,000 Jews were deported to these camps according to the Korherr Report, this would amount to approximately 71,000 deaths. How did Reynouard get to 300,000?

 

5) “Concentration and labor camps: 300,000.” This is another decidedly exaggerated figure. German orthodox historian Karin Orth wrote:[20]

 

“At least one-third of the more than 700,000 inmates registered in concentration camps in January 1945 died, perhaps even half, in death marches or mass mortality of the camps; the percentage of Jewish inmates among the dead was high.”

 

The death toll resulting from this would therefore have been 230,000-350,000 inmates. Even assuming that this estimate is well-founded, how many of these deaths were Jews? In this regard, there is no complete data, but some significant examples serve to give an idea of the order of magnitude.

 

In their analysis of the Sterbebücher (death records) of Auschwitz, Thomas Grotus and Jan Parcer found that, out of a total of 68,384 deaths documented between 1941 and 1943, those of Jews were 29,125, or 42.6%.[21] On 21 August 1944, 104,891 registered prisoners were in Auschwitz, 45,876 of them Jewish (43.7%).[22] In addition, there were some 30,000 unregistered Jews in the transit section (Durchgangslager). However, as a rule, they remained there only for a few days before getting transferred to other camps. Therefore, the mortality of Jewish prisoners was reasonably less than 50% of the total deaths toll, which was about 135,500.[23]

 

As noted in the Mauthausen Camp’s death records, Jewish inmates who died in this camp between 1938 and 1945 numbered 14,356 out of a total of 68,874,[24] hence about 21% of the total. It is therefore highly unlikely that the number of Jewish deaths in concentration camps reached 50% of the alleged 350,000 mentioned above, i.e. 175,000 deaths. The labor camps cannot have caused the remaining 125,000 deaths, so the 300,000 figure is also blatantly unfounded.

 

6) “Ghettos: 300,000.” It seems obvious to me that Reynouard refers to the Polish ghettos, because the Baltic and Soviet ones already fall into what I have indicated as the seventh category (“Disappeared in the East… in camps and ghettos, in pogroms…”). But, according to the orthodox Holocaust narrative, many of the Einsatzgruppen’s victims came from the ghettos, who are therefore counted twice.

 

The two largest ghettos – those of Warsaw and Lodz, which had a maximum number of about 400,000 and 160,000 residents, respectively ‒ recorded 69,355 deaths in Warsaw in the period January 1941 to June 1942,[25] and 47,372 in Lodz from 1938 to August 1944,[26] hence a total of 116,727. For the remaining ghettos ‒ very numerous but also much smaller ‒ there no data exists; most of them moreover suffered drastic population reductions in the second half of 1942 due to deportations to the eastern camps, so it is not realistic that there were about 183,000 people missing to get to 300,000. This figure therefore remains conjectural.

 

In conclusion, from a revisionist perspective, it is easy to accept (on the basis of the uncertain assumptions set out above) a death toll of 3 or 4.5 million Jews. The challenge is to explain how and where they died.


Endnotes

 

[1] In: G. Rudolf (Ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust. The Growing Critique of “Truth“Truth” and “Memory”.” Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago, 2003, pp. 181-213 (pp. 171-202 in the current, 4th edition of 2024).

 

[2] Idem, p. 210 (2024 edition: p. 199).

 

[3] Ibid.

 

[4] G. Reitlinger, La Soluzione Finale. Il tentativo di sterminio degli Ebrei d’Europa 1939-1945. Il Saggiatore, Milan, 1965, p. 612.

 

[5] R. Hilberg, La distruzione degli Ebrei d’Europa. Giulio Einaudi editore. Turin, 1995, p. 1319.

 

[6] F. Golczewski, “Polen,” in: Wolfgang Benz (edited by), Dimension des Völkersmords. Oldenbourg, Munich, 1991, p. 419.

 

[7] R. Hilberg, La distruzione degli Ebrei d’Europa, p. 1313.

 

[8] The work was written by 17 specialists from individual countries under the supervision of Benz. To simplify, I refer to Benz as the author.

 

[9] T. D. Dalton, Debating the Holocaust. A New Look at the Both Sides. Theses & Dissertations Press. New York, 2009, pp. 50-56.

 

[10] The New York Times, June 25, 1940, p. 4.

 

[11] Historia Magistra Vitae / Chapter 10, pp. 109-117. Can be purchased online at: https://www.lulu.com/shop/j%C3%BCrgen-graf/historia-magistra-vitae/paperback/product-1z424zk8.html? page=1&pageSize=4

 

[12] S. Klarsfeld, Le mémorial de la déportation des Juifs de France, édité et publié par Beate et Serge Klarsfeld, Paris, 1978, p. 10 (my numbering).

 

[13] ‘Statystyka ludności żydowskiej w Polsce’, in: Biuletyn Głównej Komisji Badania Zbrodni Niemieckich w Polsce, Vol. I, 1946, p. 203.

 

[14] S. Klarsfeld, Le mémorial de la déportation des Juifs de France, p. 23.

 

[15] Klaus-Michael Mallmann, Andrej Angrick, Jürgen Matthäus, Martin Cüppers (edited by), “Die Ereignismeldungen UdSSR 1941”. Dokumente der Einsatzgruppen in der Sowjetunion I. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 2011, p. 452.

 

[16] Gli Einsatzgruppen nei territori orientali occupati. Genesi, compiti e attività. Vol. I. Effepi, Genoa, 2016, pp. 257f. For the English edition, see https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the-einsatzgruppen-in-the-occupied-eastern-territories/

 

[17] Gli Einsatzgruppen nei territori orientali occupati. L’“Azione 1005.” Vol. II. Effepi, Genoa, 2017. vol. II, p. 335.

 

[18] Jewish Soldiers in the Allied Armies, online at https://www.yadvashem.org/holocaust/about/combat-resistance/jewish-soldiers.html

 

[19] D. Pohl, “Massentötungen durch Giftgas im Rahmen der ‘Aktion Reinhardt’: Aufgaben der Forschung” in: Günter Morsch, Betrand Perz (ed.), Neue Studien zu nationalsozialistischen Massentötungen durch Giftgas: Historische Bedeutung, technische Entwicklung, revisionistische Leugnung. Metropol, Berlin, 2011, p. 194.

 

[20] K. Orth, “The Genesis and Structure of the National Socialist Concentration Camps,” in: Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945. Vol. 1, Part A. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 2009, p. 194.

 

[21] T. Grotum, J. Parcer, “EDV-gestützte Auswertung der Sterbeeinträge”, in: Staatliches Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau (ed.), Sterbebücher von Auschwitz. G. Saur, Munich/New Providence/London/Paris, 1995, p. 249.

 

[22] Archive of the Central Commission of Inquiry on Crimes against the Polish People – National Memorial. NTN, 155, pp. 96 and 115.

 

[23] See my book Auschwitz: Trasporti, Forza, Mortalità. Effepi, Genoa, 2019, p. 276. For the English edition, see https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the-real-auschwitz-chronicle/, Vol. 2.

 

[24] H. Marsalek, Mauthausen. La Pietra, Milan, 1977, pp. 115 and 204.

 

[25] T. Berenstein, A. Eisenbach, B. Mark, A. Rutkowski, Faschismus – Getto – Massenmord: Dokumentation über Ausrottung und Widerstand der Juden in Polen während des zweiten Weltkrieges. Röderberg Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1960, pp. 138f.

 

[26] J. Baranowski, The Łódź Ghetto 1940-1944. Vademecum. Archiwum Państwowe w Łodzi & Bilbo, Łódź, 1999, p. 86.

Sunday, September 6, 2026

Jewish Invention Myths: The Volkswagen Beetle

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-invention-myths-the-volkswagen-beetle/

 

by Karl Radl

 

One of the more significant ‘jewish invention’ claims that I have come upon in recent months is the claim that a jew ‘invented the Volkswagen Beetle’. The Volkswagen Beetle has long been an iconic car long credited to its ostensible creator Ferdinand Porsche – as well as his design team Erwin Komenda, Josef Kales, Karl Rabe, Josef Mickl and Franz Xavier Reimspiess – was first debuted between 1936 and 1937 having been commissioned by Adolf Hitler in June 1934.

 

However, the claim that Porsche and his team ‘stole’ – or ‘took heavy inspiration’ from the work of others to create – the Volkswagen Beatle have long been circulating with the first ones kicking around in the 1950s.

 

It is from these assertions we get the claim that a ‘jew invented the Volkswagen Beetle’ as one jewish Reddit user summarised it in a thread listing so-called ‘jewish inventions’ – nearly all of which are in fact not ‘jewish inventions’ – writing:

 

‘Hitler stole the design of the VW Beetle (and also the name) from a Jewish auto engineer named Josef Ganz. He saw Ganz’s car at an auto show, scribbled a fascimile on a cocktail napkin and gave the idea to Ferdinand Porsche (a zealous SS officer) to manufacture.

 

Ganz was chased out of Europe by the Nazis & died a complete unknown somewhere in Australia. Much of his contribution to the modern auto industry has never been acknowledged, though he was arguably one of the great visionaries of his time.’ (1)

 

The claim that Josef Ganz – who was indeed jewish – was the ‘father of the Volkswagen Beetle’ is largely the work of one man: Paul Schilperoord. (2) The problem of course that Schilperoord’s book ‘Het Geheim van Hitlers Volkswagen’ is entirely speculative in nature and having read it – slowly as my Dutch simply isn’t that good – not particularly persuasive as it based on unevidenced assumptions about how Porsche (and others) were ‘influenced’ by Ganz’s designs and work but yet provide little actual evidence.

 

The argument is basically that Hitler allegedly saw Ganz’s designs at the Berlin Auto Show in 1933 and ‘ordered them copied’. The problem is that there is next to no evidence of this and what is usually left out of such claims is that the prototype that Ganz was exhibiting at the Berlin Auto Show had a completely different engine and axle layout than Porsche’s Beetle even if it superficially looked a bit similar. (3) It is also worth noting that Hitler had absolutely nothing to do with the design per se – the design actually comes from 1930/1931 where-as the design from 1934 to 1937 is simply Porsche’s refined version of his 1930/1931 design – as that was Porsche’s work who shared a common inspiration in the form of the motorcycle industry with Ganz but was not ‘inspired by Ganz’. (4)

 

The irony is that practically every country – from Britain to the United States to Belgium to France to the Soviet Union – tried to claim that they – and not Porsche and the Germans – had ‘in fact designed the Volkswagen Beetle’ and that their ideas ‘had been stolen’ by Porsche and the Germans as a form of mass intellectual/patent theft (a-la ‘Operation Paperclip’ etc). (5)

 

These claims were largely fanciful nonsense that have long been discarded by historians, but the Hungarian engineer Bela Barenyi has been widely credited with having inspired bits of Porsche’s design with his work in 1925/1926: (6)

 

 

Compared to Porsche’s July 1934 design: (7)

 

 

Now while Porsche’s 1934 design for the Volkswagen Beetle is distinctly different from Barenyi’s 1925/1926 design; you can see how Porsche’s 1934 design could be seen as having been inspired by Barenyi’s 1925/1926 design but that is as far as it goes and suggesting Barenyi was the ‘creator’ of the Volkswagen Beetle is simply wrong.

 

The other character whose role in the Volkswagen Beetle was an Austrian German engineer named Hans Ledwinka who was the chief design engineer for the Austrian-Czech car manufacturer Tatra between 1921 and 1937 as well as a friend of Porsche’s Ledwinka and that much of what Ledwinka had created throughout this period was pre-figured and complemented Porsche’s own designs and work.

 

Further it isn’t widely known that Ledwinka and Porsche’s design teams heavily collaborated in designing the Volkswagen Bettle between 1934 and 1937; (8) so Lewinka’s involvement – he’s primarily known for designing the trucks used by the Wehrmacht during the Second World War – is not only confirmed but accepted by historians.

 

The point here is that the case for Josef Ganz having something to do with the creation and the design of the Volkswagen Beetle is simply nonsense as there is no evidence that this is in fact true. While we have solid evidence that Hans Ledwinka was heavily involved in its creation as well as decent evidence that Bela Barenyi’s earlier work somewhat inspired the original Volkswagen design.

 

So no, the Volkswagen was not a ‘jewish invention’.

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.


References

 

(1) https://www.reddit.com/r/Jewish/comments/18q24ls/what_are_some_things_that_were_invented_by_jews/

 

(2) Schilperoord’s case is summarised by a short video on his website: https://josefganz.org/; also see https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-unknown-jewish-engineer-behind-hitlers-vaunted-volkswagen-beetle/

 

(3) Karl Ludvigsen, 2012, ‘Battle for the Beetle’, 2nd Edition, Bentley: Cambridge, pp. 16-17

 

(4) Ibid., pp. 13-15

 

(5) Cf. Ibid.

 

(6) https://www.mercedes-benz.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/09/HISTORIE_Bela_Barenyi_der_Lebensretter_04-710×396.jpg

 

(7) Ludvigsen, Op. Cit., p. 17

 

(8) Ibid., pp. 224-227

 

via Karl Radl’s Substack 

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Jewish Invention Myths: Anthropology

 

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-invention-myths-anthropology/

 

by Karl Radl

 

Our next ‘jewish invention’ myth is the claim by Daniel Zar that jews ‘invented the subject of anthropology’ or more specifically so-called ‘modern anthropology’.

 

Zar writes specifically credits jewish anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss as the ‘father of modern anthropology’ (1) which simply shows that Zar knows nothing about anthropology as it is a discipline that started out as a single entity – rather like psychology – and has subsequently split into multiple and often mutually exclusive sub-fields that often contradict each other but may be broadly split between cultural anthropology and physical anthropology.

 

Cultural anthropology is broadly a branch of sociology that doesn’t want to engage in the hard data mining aspect of sociology, while physical anthropology is broadly an applied version of human biology, genetics and forensic medicine. The two broad groupings within anthropology couldn’t be more different with cultural anthropology being dominated by jews and the political left almost from the very beginning (2) and physical anthropology being dominated by the political right from the very beginning. (3)

 

Anthropology developed from the earlier discipline of ethnology in the 1850s and 1860s in Europe in and around the time of the co-discovery of evolution by the British naturalists Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace in the 1850s. The French doctor Paul Broca is broadly considered the founder of physical anthropology in 1859, while the German psychologist and philosopher Theodor Waitz is broadly considered the founder of cultural anthropology in the same year with the publication of the first volume of his six volume ‘Die Anthropologie der Naturvolker’ (‘The Anthropology of Primitive Peoples’).

 

This was formalized in 1863 when British explorer and linguist Sir Richard Francis Burton and speech therapist James Hunt formed the ‘Anthropological Society of London’, while Hunt published one of the first anthropological treatises in English titled ‘The Negro’s Place in Nature’ arguing for the reality of racial differences. Burton and Hunt’s society was subsequently absorbed into the ‘Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland’ upon its founding in 1871. (4)

 

The point being that jews have absolutely nothing to do with the invention of ‘modern anthropology’ let alone anthropology as a discipline and they subsequently perverted and twisted the discipline of anthropology to support pre-determined Marxist conclusions. (5) All Claude Levi-Strauss did for anthropology was to repackage the ideas of his fellow member of the tribe (and founding father of many academic anthropology departments in the United States) Franz Boas into a new form called ‘Structuralist Anthropology’ in the mid to late 1940s that doesn’t propose or suggest anything that anthropologists and ethnologists hadn’t been doing for nearly a century at that point (6) but rather created a system for leftists in anthropology – who were often jewish (for example ‘Ashley Montagu’ [Israel Ehrenberg] and one of the founders of Afrocentrism Melville Herskowits) – (7) to use to better promote their nonsense claims that ‘race didn’t matter’ and that ‘we all bleed red so therefore we are all the same’ which still dominate most mainstream political and intellectual thought to this day.

 

In essence jews didn’t ‘invent’ anthropology but rather they utterly corrupted it into the nonsensical rotten word salad of an intellectual discipline that it still largely is to this day.

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.


References

 

(1) https://www.historyandheadlines.com/10-great-jewish-contributions-mankind/

 

(2) Cf. Gary Bullert, 2009, ‘Franz Boas as Citizen-Scientist: Gramscian-Marxist Influence on American Anthropology’, The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 208-243; also see Roger Pearson, 1997, ‘Race, Intelligence and Bias in Academe’, 2nd Edition, Scott-Townsend: Washington D.C.

 

(3) Cf. Conway Zirkle, 1959, ‘Evolution, Marxian Biology, and the Social Scene’, 1st Edition, University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia and Carleton Putnam, 1961, ‘Race and Reason: A Yankee View’, 1st Edition, Public Affairs Press: Washington D.C.

 

(4) Much of this is covered in some detail – albeit pejoratively – in Dane Kennedy, 2007, ‘The Highly Civilized Man: Richard Burton and the Victorian World’, 1st Edition, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, and Frank McLynn, 1991, ‘From the Sierras to the Pampas: Richard Burton’s Travels in the Americas 1860-1869’, 1st Edition, Century: London

 

(5) Cf. Bullert, Op. Cit.; Pearson, Op. Cit.; Zirkle, Op. Cit.; for how this has impacted society ever since cf. Frank Ellis, 2001, ‘Race, Marxism and the “Deconstruction” of the United Kingdom’, The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 694-718 in addition to Frank Ellis, 2006, ‘Marxism, Multiculturalism, and Free Speech’, Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies Monograph Series No. 31, Council for Social and Economic Studies: Washington D.C.

 

(6) For example, cf. Kennedy, Op. Cit.

 

(7) On the jewish origins of Afrocentrism please see my article: https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/martin-bernal-and-melville-herskowits

Thursday, August 27, 2026

Jews in America – Part I


„We have the Israelis coming to us for equipment. We can say we can’t possibly get the Congress to support a program like this. And they say don’t worry about the Congress. We will take care of the Congress. This is somebody from another country, but they can do it. They own, you know, the banks in this country. The newspapers. Just look at where the Jewish money is.“ (General George S. Brown)


„Now, just think, to accuse me of such a crime. Think of it! I, who have for twenty-five years single- handed struggled against the invasion of the Russian Government into American money markets, and to this day stave them off. Think of it! Who, as I, have been foremost in the past for agitation and insisted to the President of the United States; as some of you must know, that our treaty with Russia must be abrogated.“ (New York Times, June 5, 1916. Articles entitled, Jacob Schiff Quits Jewish Movements.“


„The guidance and control of America has gravitated into the hands of those least worthy of trusteeship. One of their most notable achievements, has been the making of ‘male prostitutes’ who do the dirty work for them [Jews]. A ‘male prostitute’ is a male who offers the facilities of his anatomy from the neck up, to anyone who is willing to pay the price, exactly as a female prostitute of the same species offers her body from the waist down. Thousands of these ‘pseudo-Christian ‘male prostitutes – male prostitutes are circulating in all walks of life, pandering to evil propaganda for monetary profit and political power.“ (Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman).


„Do not let the forces of evil take over to make this a Christian America.“ (Senator Howard Metzenbaum, 11/6/86)


„Although a Republican, the former Governor has a sincere regard for President Roosevelt and his politics. He referred to the ‘Jewish ancestry’ of the President, explaining how he is a descendent of the Rossocampo family expelled from Spain in 1620. Seeking safety in Germany, Holland and other countries, members of the family, he said, changed their name to Rosenberg, Rosenbaum, Rosenblum, Rosenvelt and Rosenthal. The Rosenvelts in North Holland finally became Roosevelt, soon becoming apostates with the first generation and other following suit until, in the fourth generation, a little storekeeper by the name of Jacobus Roosevelt was the only one who remained true to his Jewish Faith. It is because of this Jewish ancestry, Former Governor Osborn said, that President Roosevelt has the trend of economic safety (?) in his veins.“ (Chase S. Osborn, 1934 at St. Petersburg, Florida, The Times Newspaper).


„The Jews are a Distinct Nationality regardless of where they live, their station in life or their shades of belief, and his clarion call to all the Jews in the world to ‘organize, organize, organize,’ until every Jew in America must stand up and be counted - counted with us - or prove himself, wittingly or unwittingly, of the few who are against their own people.“ (From and address delivered in June, 1915, before the Eastern Council of the Central Conference of Reform Rabbis, by Justice Louis D. Brandeis).


„But either Europe will be recognized on a revolutionary basis or it will not survive. Once the sovereign State is no longer recognized, once international laws control and limit the sovereignty of the States, the way will be paved for real safeguards of citizens’ rights and of the rights of minority groups. The whole conception of majorities and minorities may get a different aspect...You are not only the strongest Jewry of the world numerically, not only the most powerful Jewry of the world politically, socially and economically...The same applies to American Jewry within the more limited field of its possibilities and tasks, if it will be dominated by the feeling of solidarity with European Jewry, realizing that its future is linked up with the future of European Jewry because we are one people.“ (In an address of Dr. Nahum Goldmann, a British Rabbi, Chairman of the Administrative Committee of the World Jewish Congress, reported in the New York Times, February 11, 1940).


„To you, Mr. President (Franklin D. Roosevelt), we say: Neither you nor any of your (Jewish) Roosevelt ancestors has ever fought in any war for America, notwithstanding they have lived in and off New York City, since Colonial days, as big merchants and money-changers. We tell you we want to live and be happy, to delve, to work, to succeed, to fail, to fall, to rise, to know the uses of adversity, to ‘treat the blows of circumstance,’ to have our homes, however humble; to provide for our wives and children, to rear our sons, to aid and comfort our sick, poor and helpless without regard to race, creed or color, to serve Christ and country free from Europe’s incessant strife, to seek the pathways of the just, to do our bit for humanity and America, and to defend our native land to the last drop of blood; but we and our posterity demand freedom from tribal wars on foreign soil and the right to have our say as to whether we die on the Rhine and become Europe’s cannon fodder. We deny your right by sly parallel understandings and secret negotiations, aided by press, radio, war-mongers, fellow travelers and foreign scum, who have become our arrogant, demanding guests, to traffic in our blood, birthright and security. ‘Lord, God of Hosts, be with us yet, lest we forget - lest we forget.’ (Cincinnatus, War! War! War!, p. 8)


„Well, we have the leverage in the sense that we supply all the wherewithal...or a major part of the wherewithal to finance or to pay for everything Israel does. We don’t have any leverage in the sense that Israel controls the Senate. The Senate is at least...a subservient, in my opinion, much too much. We should be more concerned about the United States’ interest, rather than doing the bidding of Israel. This is a most unusual development.“ (Senator William J. Fulbright).


But almost always conversion on these terms was only outward and false. Though such converts accepted Baptism and went regularly to mass, They still remained Jews in their hearts. They were called Marranos, ‘Accursed Ones,’ and there were perhaps a hundred thousand of them. Often they possessed enormous wealth. Their daughters married into the noblest families, even into the blood royal, and their sons sometimes entered the Church and rose to the highest offices. It is said that even one of the popes (Pope Leo X, Pope Clement VII was just two of them, as related in Philip II, William Thomas Walsh) was of this Marrano stock.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 234-235).


„The great majority of the Senate of the United States...somewhere around 80 percent...are completely in support of Israel, anything Israel wants. This has been demonstrated time and again, and this has made it difficult.“ (Senator William J. Fulbright)


„Our major vice of old, as of today, is parasitism. We are a people of vultures living on the labor and the good nature of the rest of the world...What a sorry spectacle the Jews makes on this continent which he pretends to have enriched! Not only does he fail to contribute any glamor [culture and art] to the scene. He does not even contribute man-power. He does not dig wells, plough fields, forge skyscrapers, lay bricks, cut out trenches, spin wheels, bake dough, fell trees, pack tin cans, sweep streets, heave coal, fire furnaces, weave cloth, dig subways, raise ramparts, wall floods, rivet bridges, hinge gates, or fight fires...Towards the man-power of America, Jewry contributes only that which it catches in its own sweatshops, as in so many rat traps - set by itself. It seems to be part of the Jew’s unwritten code that he should never work. Unless something happens to change his vision, I venture to add that he never will, either...I cannot find anything of value that the Jews have created in their 250 years residence on the American continent.“ (Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live, The Golden Hind Press, New York (1934), pp. 56, 101, 108).


„It was Marxist Jews who were behind the anti-white ‘civil rights’ movement in America to breakdown the natural barrier between the white and colored races. It was the Jew Joel Spingarn who had founded and headed the ‘National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’ in 1909. After his death his son Arthur headed the NAACP until 1965. The Vice President was another Jew, Rabbi Solomon. In 1965 another Jew, Kevie Kaplan, took over the organization. Two longstanding Jewish lawyers for the NAACP were Andrew D. Weinberger and Jack Greenberg.“ (Weinberger and Greenberg had filed briefs of amici curiae in the U.S. Supreme Court, on behalf of the NAACP, to strike down a Virginia statute which prohibited interracial marriages, in the case of Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1(1967). Two Jewish lawyers, Benard S. Cohen and Philip J. Hirschkop argued the case for the appellants (the interracial couple). The Virginia law was held to violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The Jews won!). (Charles A. Weisman, Who is Esau-Edom, p. 107).


„Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (read that Jewish influence), I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens, the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican Government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real Patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests. Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?“ (Washington’s Farewell Address).


„The citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in favor of liberty and happiness...beyond the Atlantic. In the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with our policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invaded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries...“ (President James Monroe).


„Their (Europe’s - Jewish) mutual jealousies, their balance of power, their complicated alliances, their forms and principles of government are all foreign to us. They are nations of eternal war. All their energies are expended in the destruction of the labor, property, and lives of their people. On our part never had a people so favorable a chance of trying the opposite system, of peace and fraternity with mankind, and the direction of all our means and faculties to the purposes of improvement instead of destruction...And the system of government which shall keep us afloat amidst the wreck of the world will be immortalized in history. I am so far from believing that our reputation will be tarnished by our not having mixed in the made contests of the rest of the world that, setting aside the ravings of pepper-pot politicians, of whom there are enough in every age and country,, I believe it will place us high on the scale of wisdom to have preserved our country tranquil and prosperous during a contest which prostrated the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of every country on the other side of the Atlantic.“ (President Thomas Jefferson)


„The political system of the United States is essentially extra-European. To stand in firm and cautious independence of all entanglement in the European system has been a cardinal point of their policy under every administration of their government from the peace of 1783 to this day...Every year’s experience rivets it more deeply in the principles and opinions of the nation.“ (President John Quincy Adams).


„We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them into the program of the Communist Party. In America, we aim for several victories. While inflaming the Negro minorities against the whites, we will instill in the whites a guilt complex for their supposed exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Blacks to rise to prominence in every walk of life and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige,, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and will begin the process which will deliver America to our cause.“ (Jewish Playwright Israel Cohen, A Radical Program For The Twentieth Century. Also entered into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957, by Rep. Thomas Abernathy).


„Which are you first, a Jew or an American? A Jew.“ (David Ben Gurion)


„...This weakness of the President [Roosevelt] frequently results in failure on the part of the White House to report all the facts to the Senate and the Congress; its [The Administration] description of the prevailing situation is not always absolutely correct and in conformity with the truth...When I lived in America, I learned that Jewish personalities – most of them rich donors for the parties – had easy access to the President. They used to contact him over the head of the Foreign Secretary and the representative at the United Nations and other officials. They were often in a position to alter the entire political line by a single telephone conversation...Stephen Wise...occupied a unique position, not only within American Jewry, but also generally in America...He was a close friend of Wilson...he was also an intimate friend of Roosevelt and had permanent access to him, a factor which naturally affected his relations to other members of the American Administration...Directly after this, the President’s car stopped in front of the veranda, and before we could exchange greetings, Roosevelt remarked: ‘How interesting! Sam Roseman, Stephen Wise and Nahum Goldman are sitting there discussing what order they should give the President of the United States. Just imagine what amount of money the Nazis would pay to obtain a photo of this scene.’ We began to stammer to the effect that there was an urgent message from Europe to be discussed by us, which Rosenman would submit to him on Monday. Roosevelt dismissed him with the words: ‘This is quite all right, on Monday I shall hear from Sam what I have to do,’ and he drove on.“ (USA, Europe, Israel, Nahum Goldmann, pp. 53, 66-67, 116).


„No sooner was the President’s statement made...than a Jewish deputation came down from New York and in two days ‘fixed’ the two houses [of Congress] so that the President had to renounce the idea.“ (As recorded by Sir Harold Spring-Rice, former British Ambassador to the U.S. in reference to a proposed treaty with Czarist Russia, favored by the President)


„The present program of palliative relief must give way to a program of fundamental reconstruction. American democracy must be socialized by subjecting industrial production and distribution to the will of the People’s Congress. The first step is to abolish the federal veto and to enlarge the express powers of the national government through immediate constitutional amendment. A gradual march in the direction of socialization will follow.“ (Rabbi Victor Eppstein, Opinion April, 1937)


„I am not an American citizen of Jewish faith. I am a Jew. I have been an American for sixty-three years, but I have been a Jew for 4 000 years.“ (Rabbi Stephen S. Wise)


„When the conspirators get ready to take over the United States they will use fluoridated water and vaccines to change people’s attitudes and loyalties and make them docile, apathetic, unconcerned and groggy. According to their own writings and the means they have already confessedly employed, the conspirators have deliberately planned and developed methods to mentally deteriorate, morally debase, and completely enslave the masses. They will prepare vaccines containing drugs that will completely change people. Secret Communist plans for conquering America were adopted in 1914 and published in 1953. These plans called for compulsory vaccination with vaccines containing change agent drugs. They also plan on using disease germs, fluoridation and vaccinations to weaken the people and reduce the population.“ (Impact of Science on Society, by Bertrand Russell)


„The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality.“ (Ben Wattenberg, Jewish ‘philosopher,’ in The Good News, The Bad News, p. 84)