The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Saturday, June 27, 2026
Jews and Communism – Part I
Part I
„Not a single one of the doctrines of Marx has ever been accepted by any economist or any philosopher. But what of it? It was necessary that Gaiseric should convince economists or philosophers that there were sound reasons why he should capture Rome. He and his followers wanted it, and they had the power to take it.“ (Professor Thomas Nixon Carver, Introduction to Socialism vs. Civilization, by Boris Brasol, p. 10, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1920).
„The class consciousness of the masses must be transformed into action and class power; and the arming of the masses is the form of expression of this transformation, the instrument for conquering the bourgeoisie and crushing counter-revolutionary manoeuvers...The proletariat alone is the revolutionary force, the proletariat alone msy wage the uncompromising struggle for the overthrow of Capitalism, the proletariat alone is the maker and the preserver of the Revolution; and it is necessary that this proletariat shall be armed, that it shall itself directly, consciously, energetically and dynamically, constitute the state, the army, the police and th ejudiciary, shall itself usurp and discharge the functions of the ‘state.’„ (Jewish Italian Communist Louis C. Fraina, thecounder of the American Communist Party, Boston, The Revolutionary Age Publishers, p. 49).
„...An exact representation of the universe, of its evolution, of the development of mankind and of the reflection of this evolution in the minds of men, can only be obtained by methods of dialectics.“ (Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, p. 48).
„I cannot help feeling that Communism, whatever its exponents may say, has recovered that essential core of a real belief in God, which organized Christianity has in our day largely lost.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 125).
„Our bourgeois philanthropy, whatever form it may take, is really only the effort to give back to the workers a little part of that which our whole social system, systematically, robs them of, and so to prop up that system yet a little longer...
It is the workers who produce all values, but the lion’s share of what they produce falls to the lion, the capitalist class, and enables the capitalist arbitrarily to decide what he will do with it and whether or not he will use a part of the spoils for the good of the despoiled, a part of the plunder for the good of the plundered; and, however, disinterestedly individual men and women may devote themselves to this task of restitution, the fact remains that, for the capitalist class as a whole, all philanthropic effort is a work of restitution for self- preservation...
Shall I cast my lot with the oppressors, content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of a perishing society? Shall I spend my life in applying palliatives, in trying to make the intolerable endurable yet a little longer?...Shall I not rather make common cause with these, my brothers and sisters, to make an end of such a system?...
As loyal members of the ruling class, our work must, I repeat, be merely palliative. For a radical cure of the social disease means the end of the system of exploiting the workers...Another of the indispensable books is ‘The Condition of the Working Class in England,’ by Frederick Engels, which is especially valuable for American readers, because the conditions described in it as they prevailed in England at the time of its appearance in Germany are reproduced upon a still larger scale in America now, at the moment of its publication in an English translation. It is the best introduction to the study of modern scientific political economy and of the fundamental work par excellence thereof, ‘Capital,’ by Karl Marx.“ (Address by Florence Kelley, May 14, 1887, before the New York Association of Collegiate Alumnae, entitled „The Need of Theoretical Preparation for Philanthropic Work.“)
„The Jews welcome this revolution in the Christian world, and the Jews should show an example. It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism: all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, by Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 148).
„The Communists are against religion (Christianity), and they seek to destroy religion; yet, when we look deeper into the nature of Communism, we see that it is essential nothing else than a religion (Judaism).“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 138).
„But the Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, pp. 143-144).
„While professing to be ‘profoundly disturbed’ by the aggression of anti-Semitic Germany, Roosevelt continued his special friendship for Soviet Russia after its attacks upon Outer Mongolia, Poland, Latvia, Esthonia, Lithuania and Finland. Professing an adoration for ‘democracy’ he refused, as the Jews control 90 percent of the scrap iron business, to invoke the Neutrality Act against Japan in its war on China, or against Russia when, with Germany, she invaded Poland and attacked Finland. He extended a warm welcome to the Communist Ambassador Oumansky when he presented his credentials and, on the same day, displayed marked coldness toward the newly appointed Ambassador from Christian Spain.“ (War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, p. 152).
„The founding prophet of the leftist faith, Karl Marx, was born in 1818, the son of a Jewish father who changed his name from Herschel to Heinrich and converted to Christianity to advance his career. The young Marx grew into a man consumed by hatred for Christianity.
Internationalizing the worst antichrist stereotypes, he incorporated them into his early revolutionary vision, identifying Jews as symbols of the system of private property and bourgeois democracy he wanted to further. ‘The god of the Jews had been secularized and has become the god of this world,’ Marx wrote. ‘Money is the jealous god of the Jews, beside which no other god may stand.’ Once the Revolution succeeds in ‘destroying the empirical essence of Christianity, he promised, ‘the Jew will become the rulers of the world. This early Marxist formulation is the transparent seed of the mature vision, causing Paul Johnson to characterize Marxism as ‘the antichristian of the intellectuals.’
The international Communist creed that Marx invented is a creed of hate. The solution that Marx proposed to the Christian ‘problem’ was to eliminate the system that ‘creates’ the Christian. The Jews, he said, ‘are only symptoms of a more extensive evil that must eradicate capitalism. The Jews are only symbols of a more pervasive enemy that must be destroyed; capitalists.’
In the politics of the left, racist hatred is directed not only against Christian capitalists but against all capitalists; not only against capitalists, but anyone who is not poor, and who is White; and ultimately against Western Civilization itself. The Marxist revolution is antichrist elevated to a global principle.“ (David Horowitz, Human Events).
„Religion is one of the forms of the spiritual yoke which always and everywhere has been laid on the masses of the people crushed by poverty. The weakness of the exploited classes, in their struggles with their oppressors, inevitably produced a faith in a better life in the next world, just as the weakness of the savage in the struggle with nature led to faith in gods, devils and miracles. Religion teaches such men, who work and endure poverty all their lives, humility and patience by holding out the consolation of a heavenly reward. But the exploiters are urged by faith to do good on earth, because in this way they think to win justification for their existence and a sort of ticket of admission to heavenly bliss. Religion is an opiate for the people, a sort of spiritual vodka, meant to make the slaves of capitalism tread in the dust their human form and their aspirations to a semi- decent existence...But the slave who becomes conscious of his slavery has already half ceased to be a slave. The modern worker, who is taught by his work in the factory and enlightened by urban life, contemptuously casts off religious prejudices, and leaves heaven to the parsons and devout bourgeois, while he himself tries to win a better life here on earth.“ (V.I. Lenin, Socialism and Religion, Rene Fueloep Miller, The Mind and Face of Bolshevism, pp. 77-78).
„In the U.S.S.R. Judaism and Christianity have been buried together. They sleep in the common grave reserved for all religions. The Communists have made no difference between cults...Their philosophy was scientific materialism, they denied the value of all religion, thus they struck at Judaism as at all religions. It is forbidden to give religious instruction to children under eighteen. At school it is explained to the pupils that they will betray the revolution if they put foot within the church or synagogue. With the result that the synagogues are empty...Zionism is banned. To the Communist Zionism is doubly reprehensible, first because they believe it to be in the service of Zionism is severely punished; Zionists have been imprisoned, exiled, and even shot. The suppression of Zionism and of religion (continues the editor) was a great tragedy for the Jewish spirit... The children, victorious, pursue their object (Communism) with the certainty of having chosen a superior mode of Life.“ (L’Universe-israÇlite, September 7-14, 1934).
„Use the courts, use the judges, use the constitution of the country, use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends. Do not stint in your labor in this direction. And when you have succeeded you will discover that you can now effect your own legislation at will and you can, by careful organization, by constant campaigns about the terrors of society, by pretense as to your effectiveness, make the capitalist himself, by his own appropriation, finance a large portion of the quiet Communist conquest of that nation.“ (Address of the Jew Laventria Beria, The Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics, page 8).
„...there is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself. In the fact that so many Jews are Bolsheviks. In the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.“ (The London Jewish Chronicle, April 4, 1919)
„Some call it Marxism -- I call it Judaism.“ (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
„Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels,“ Weyl writes, „were neither internationalists nor believers in equal rights of all the races and peoples. They opposed the struggles for national independence of those races and peoples that they despised. They believed that the ‘barbaric’ and ‘ahistoric’ peoples who comprised the immense majority of mankind had played no significant role in history and were not destined to do so in the foreseeable future.“ (Karl Marx, by Nathaniel Weyl).
„We are living in a highly organized state of socialism. The state is all; the individual is of importance only as he contributes to the welfare of the state. His property is only his as the state does not need it. He must hold his life and his possessions at the call of the state.“ (Bernard M. Baruch, The Knickerbocker Press, Albany, N.Y. August 8, 1918)
„If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist Internationalism then the Jewish race is doomed.“ (George Marlen, Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin, p. 414, New York, 1937)
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
Did Adolf Hitler Threaten to ‘Annihilate the Jewish Race in Europe’ on 30th January 1939?
by Karl Radl
One of the most common claims that desperate promoters of the ‘Holocaust’ myth like to bring forth when confronted with the primary documentation that suggests that the ‘Holocaust’ is a myth based on a mix of wartime black propaganda and rumour is the claim that Hitler himself ‘confirmed’ that ‘if there was a war he would exterminate the jews’.
Recently Rabbi Jeffrey Salkin made just such a nonsense claim in his column ‘The Many Forms of Holocaust Distortion and Why J. D. Vance Remarks Matter’ at ‘Religion News’ (1) that I wanted to address separately from my length debunk of his nonsensical attempt to create a ‘system’ to ‘categorize Holocaust Distortion’, (2) because it is a common enough false claim in and of itself and thus needs to be addressed separately.
Salkin writes that:
‘To quote my friend Peter Himmelman in his Substack:
Hitler (may his name be erased) himself was explicit about what the war was for. In his speech to the Reichstag on January 30, 1939, he declared that if war came, its result would be “the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.” This was not metaphor. It was demonic prophecy, a warped but deeply held theology, the articulation of a destiny he believed necessary to redeem the world.’ (3)
The problem of course is that Himmelman and Salkin’s claim is just moronic rubbish that relies on reading Hitler’s speech of 30th January 1939 completely out of historical context and to replace Hitler’s meaning with their own claim of ‘what Hitler meant’.
The German historian of the Third Reich Hans Mommsen – building on the work of other historians of the Third Reich like Yehuda Bauer and Ian Kershaw – commented on how nonsensical these sorts of claims are in a widely-cited journal article in ‘History and Memory’ in 1997.
He began by first explaining how:
‘The most widely known quotation from Hitler’s public orations is taken from his speech in the German Reichstag on 30 January 1939. Referring to the Jewish question, it contains the macabre prophecy: “Today I will be once more a prophet: if the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevizing of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!” This statement has been taken as evidence that in early 1939 Hitler already intended to exploit the conditions of a future war to annihilate the Jews, at least those under German rule.’ (4)
So far so good, but as Mommsen goes on to explain: Hitler obviously had no intention whatsoever of ‘exterminating the jews’ at this point in history even according to the orthodox ‘Holocaust’ interpretation and was in fact explicitly referring – and only referring – to the problems he had encountered with the mass voluntary deportation of the jews in Germany and Austria to other countries especially North and South America.
He writes how:
‘However, it seems to me that in order to analyse this statement – which was unprecedented in its harshness -it should be read within the immediate political context and the particular conditions that prevailed at that time. First of all, Hitler’s threat did not occupy a prominent place in his rather lengthy speech, which celebrated his seizure of power and was largely devoted to the “party saga” (Parteierzaehlung), a subject that usually comprised considerable parts of Hitler’s speeches and did not vary in content. It was only in the last part of the speech after he had spoken for over two hours, that Hitler raised the issue of Jewish emigration. The context was the still ongoing negotiations between Hermann Goring and George Rublee, the American chairman of the Intergovernmental Committee for Refugees, on a plan for the emigration of Jews from Germany. Thus, the threat against European Jewry was made in relation to the aim of accelerating the Jews’ departure from Germany. The process was being stymied by the increasingly strict stipulations on the part of the potential host countries, who insisted that immigrants arrive with an adequate amount of foreign currency for their subsistence; put differently, to avoid the likelihood of their becoming a public charge.’ (5)
As well as how:
‘It is in this context that Hitler’s remarks in the Reichstag should be understood. The Fuhrer referred indirectly to the pending Rublee-Wohlthat negotiations, complaining that “third countries suddenly refuse to receive Jews, using all possible excuses,” and asserting that there was “enough space for settlement” in the world to dispose of the Jews and that an understanding between the nations on this issue was long overdue because Europe could “not become pacified before the Jewish question has been settled.” At least, he declared, the German government was ultimately resolved to get rid of the Jews, who would have to learn to make their living like all other peoples through ordinary work. It was after these declarations, which were targeted at the Western governments and sought to gain their support for the emigration of German Jews, that Hitler made his much-quoted threat against “the Jewish race in Europe.” His formulations should be perceived in the context of the volkisch anti-Semitism that had been virulent in Germany since the Wilhelmine period. The notion of using the Jews as hostages in order to prevent the Western powers from inflicting damage on Germany was familiar to the fanatical anti-Semites of that era.’ (6)
With Mommsen then summarizing how:
‘The notion that Hitler’s speech of 30 January 1939 constitutes incontrovertible evidence of his intention to eventually solve the Jewish question by the use of violence has repeatedly been assessed in the literature. In the context in which it was made, however, it rather indicates that at that time Hitler did not perceive any other solution than the enforced emigration of the Jewish population, including resurrecting the idea of settling the Jews in Madagascar, a suggestion that had been raised again by the Polish side.’ (7)
Further Mommsen is at pains to point out that Hitler later uses exactly the same language – and refers back to this statement (which Hitler deliberately misdating to 30th September 1939 rather than 30th January 1939 for the purposes of good propaganda so as to seem prophetic for both his contemporary audience and for posterity) – at the beginning and the height of the so-called ‘Holocaust’ (i.e., ‘Operation Reinhard’) and even then he clearly still does not mean actual ‘extermination’ since he refers to solving the jewish question ‘at a future date’ not at the moment when – according to the orthodox ‘Holocaust’ narrative – the Third Reich was allegedly engaging in a mass extermination operation ‘to solve the jewish question’.
He writes that:
‘The episode of the Reichstag speech, however, seems to be put in quite another light by the fact that Hitler repeated his prediction on 30 January 1941, using exactly the same words and referring to his earlier speech which he erroneously dated 1 September 1939. He reiterated this passage on 30 January and 8 November 1942 and alluded to it again on 24 February and 30 September 1942 and on 24 February 1943. While the context differed to some extent, the main argument – that in the long run the European nations, whether they were opponents or friends of the Reich, would cooperate in the struggle against international Jewry – remained the same. In addition, he alluded to his former prophecy whenever he addressed the party on 30 January or 24 February (the latter date being the Partei Grundungstag, the anniversary of the founding of the party). Although some of the allusions were sharpened in conjunction with the ongoing genocide, Hitler preserved the masked language and avoided any direct mention of the mass murder. He continued to depict the solution of the Jewish question in Europe as a task that still lay in the future and, when speaking of the actual steps pursued by the German Reich toward this aim, he would refer exclusively to the anti-Jewish legislation and indoctrination, never to the killing operations as such.’ (8)
Mommsen’s interpretation jives with a literal reading of the Wannsee Protocol of January 1942 – rather than the unproven and almost entirely unevidenced interpretation that ‘deportation and evacuation’ at this top-secret meeting was meant as code for ‘deportation and extermination’ – (9) and that the jews of Europe were being deported/evacuated to concentration and labour camps in the East for the purpose of labour – on which point the Wannsee Protocol is remarkably clear despite ‘Holocaust’ scholars perpetually commenting on it without seeming to have read the document – (10) and to await the future final solution of the jewish question that was still under discussion till near the end of the Second World War.
The central point here is that Hitler’s comment in his 30th January 1939 speech at the Reichstag where he stated:
‘Today I will be once more a prophet: if the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevizing of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!’ (11)
Never referred to the ‘mass extermination’ of the jews but rather the ‘mass deportation’ of the jews from Europe or put another way: the Third Reich intended to ensure that there were no jews left in Europe to act as a subversive fifth column against its people and their national governments and was seeking to achieve this not through ‘extermination’ but rather mass voluntary (and later during the war forced) deportation.
It is that simple.
Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.
References
(2) For this please see my article: https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-holocaust-minimization
(4) Hans Mommsen, 1997, ‘Hitler’s Reichstag Speech of 30 January 1939’, History and Memory, Vol. 9, Nos. 1 & 2, p. 147
(5) Ibid, pp. 147-148
(6) Ibid., p. 150
(7) Ibid., p. 152
(8) Ibid., p. 156
(9) For the interpretation of the Wannsee Protocol as a ‘code for genocide’ see Lucy Dawidowicz, 1977, ‘The War against the Jews 1933-45’, 1st Edition, Pelican: London, pp. 176-180
(10) For example Eberhard Jackel, ‘Die Konferenz am Wannsee’, Die Zeit, 17th January 1992, p. 33
(11) Quoted by Mommsen, Op. Cit., p. 147
Monday, June 22, 2026
Saturday, June 20, 2026
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Inconvenient History - Volume 11
DOWNLOAD THE BOOK IN PDF FORMAT.
Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern warfare.
Sunday, June 14, 2026
New World Order - Communism by the Backdoor - Part 5
By Denis Wise
This episode shows the infiltration of the Roman Catholic Church
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)