Sunday, September 27, 2026

Jews and Non-Jews


„Years of observation and thought have given increasing strength to the belief that we Jews stand apart from you gentiles, that a primal duality breaks the humanity I know into two distinct parts; that this duality is a fundamental, and that all differences among you gentiles are trivialities compared with that which divided all of you from us.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 12)


„You may even have Jews in your midst who did not learn their way of life from us, and did not inherit it from a Jewish forebear. We may have authentic gentiles in our midst: these single protests are of no account; they are extreme and irrelevant variations.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 21).


„I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 23).


„You have your way of life, we ours. In your system of life we are essentially without ‘honor.’ In our system of life you are essentially without morality. In your system of life we must forever appear graceless; to us you must forever appear godless.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 34).


„According to Jewish belief, the Jewish People constitutes a species of their its own...i.e., a special, separate act of Creation by the Almighty. ‘The thought of creating the Jewish People preceded every other thought’ of the Almighty when creating the Universe according to the teaching of Rabbi Samuel bar Isaac.“ (Bereshith Rabba 1,5)


„When Germany and England and America will long have lost their present identity or purpose, we shall still be strong in ours.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 111).


„Judaism, which was destroyed politically (as a result of the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D.), went forth into the great world. It adapted its possessions to its wanderings. I once compared it to an army going to war, a ‘movable State.’

Jews were compelled to smuggle their goods across from frontier to frontier; so they chose abstract wares, easy to stubble; and this gave them ability, despite ghettos and restrictions, to enter everywhere; and so it is that the Hebrew people have penetrated everywhere.

The argument is that Judaism, by penetrating among the Gentiles (IN CHRISTIANS GUISE or otherwise), has gradually undermined the remnants of paganism. Such penetration has not been without deliberate Jewish conniving in the shape of assistance bestowed in a thousand ways, devices and disguises. It has been affected in great measure by crypto-Jews, who have permeated Christianity and spoken through the mouth of Christianity.

By these devices of their Jewish blood; and owing to an instance for ‘requital,’ they have gradually induced Christianity to accept what was left in it of pagan elements as their own; and it is they who, in principle (even though they are called by great Gentile names), of Democracy, of Socialism, and of Communism. All this achievement...has come about chiefly through unknown anonymous Jews, Jews in secret, either crypto-Jews who mingled among the Gentiles and nurtured great thinkers from among them; or, through the influence of Jews, who, in the great crises of liberty and freedom, have stood behind the scenes; or through Jewish teachers and scholars from the time of the Middle Ages.

It was disciples of Jewish teachers who headed the Protestant movements. These dogs, these haters of the Jews have a keen nose. In truth, Jewish influence in Germany is powerful. It is impossible to ignore it. Marx was a Jew. His manner of thought was Jewish. His keenness of intellect was Jewish; and one of his forebears was a most distinguished rabbi endowed with a powerful mind. The newspapers, under Jewish control, obviously served as an auxiliary in all movements in favor of freedom. Not in vain have Jews been drawn toward journalism. In their hands it became a weapon highly fitted to meet their needs...

The Gentiles have at last realized this secret, that Judaism has gradually penetrated them like a drug. The Gentile nature is in revolt, and is trying to organize the final battle. Christianity is trying to organize its last war against Judaism. And there is no doubt that this warfare...is being waged specifically against Democracy, against Socialism. This is another world wide warfare again against the forces of Judaism. I venture to think that Socialism in its highest form is the fruit of the Jewish spirit, and the fruit of the world outlook of the prophets. It is they who were the first Socialists.

War is now being waged against us {but unknown to most of Christianity. Because God’s People refuse to accept knowledge and recognize the enemy}, against Judaism, not in our own land, but in the great outer world where we are scattered. They would ‘smoke us out’ of all the cracks and crannies where we have hidden. They would exterminate us like bacilli, and be rid of us.“ (N.H. Bialik, in an address delivered at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, May 11, 1933, which appeared in Lines of Communication, Palestine, July, 1933)


„The Western mind is incapable of thinking religiously.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, a Jew, p. 185).


„The Universal Israelite Alliance...addresses itself to every type of worship. It wishes to penetrate all religions, as it has found access to all countries...Let all men of enlightenment, without distinction of sec, find a means of union in the Universal Israelite Association, whose aims are so noble, so broad, and so highly civilizing...To reach out a friendly hand to all who, although born in a different worship from ours, offer us the hand of fellowship, acknowledging that all religions which are based on morality and acknowledge God ought to be friendly towards one another: thus to destroy the barriers separating what is destined one day to be united, that is the grand supreme object of our Alliance...I summon to our Association our brethren of every form of worship. Let them come to us...Our grand mission is to put the Jewish population in touch with the authorities in every country...to make our voices heard in the cabinets of ministers and in the ears of princes, whatever be the religion that is despised, persecuted, or attacked.“ (Archives Israelites Universelle, tom. xxv, pp. 511-520 (1861). Quoted in Rev. S.J. Deschamps, Les Sociétés Secrètes et la Société, p. 24).


„For fifty years I have been a resolute partisan of assimilation of the Jews, and have believed in it. Today I confess my error. The American melting-pot will never produce the fusion of one Jew. Fifty years ago we were near to assimilating ourselves to the Americans. But since then two millions of our brother (or three) have arrived from the East, keeping their ancient traditions, bringing with them their old ideal. This army has submerged us. It is the hand of God. The Jew must differentiate himself from his neighbor; he must know it; he must be conscious of it; he must be proud of it.“ (The Jewish Chronicle, April 28, 1911, M. Schindler, an American Rabbi).


„We are hostile to strangers, guests in all countries, and at the same time we find ourselves at home in all countries when we are masters there.“ (Isaac Blumchen, Le Droit de la Race Supérieure).


„I do not intend,“ declares Herzl, „to provoke a softening of opinion in our favor. It would be idle, and would lack dignity. I am content to ask the Jews if, in the countries where we are numerous, it is true that the position of advocates, doctors, engineers, professors, and employees of all kinds, belonging to our race (people), is becoming more and more intolerable.“ (Le Droit de la Race Supérieure, Isaac Blumehen).


„[The Jews] fill in proportion, thanks to their insistence, more posts than the other communities, Catholic and Protestant. Their disastrous influence makes itself felt above all in affairs which have most weight in the fortune of the country; there is no enterprise in which the Jews have not their large share, no public loan which they do not monopolize, no disaster which they have not prepared and by which they do not profit. It is therefore, ill-considered to complain, as they always do, they who have all the favors and who make all the profits!“ (Les Juifs (1847), Cerfberr de Medelsheim; also quoted by Gougenot des Mousseaux in Le Juif, (1869).


„More than ever the study of the Jewish problem is a pressing reality, but...the Jewish question is also more than ever ‘taboo’; one must not speak of it, still less study it. At most the right to deny its existence is recognized. Those even who should be most interested in finding a solution pretend to solve the problem by abstention or silence which is considered both a sane method and a high humanitarian idea...Judaism in its origins and expansions presents an ensemble of sentiments, notions, and ideas which are the source of veritable systems, religious, political and social; one has the right to discuss and contest these systems.“ (Le Problème Juic, (1921), Georges Batault).


„The dispersion of the Jews has rendered them a cosmopolitan people. They are the only cosmopolitan people, and in this capacity must act, and are acting, as a solvent of national and racial differences. The great Ideal of Judaism is not that Jews shall be allowed to flock together one day in some hole-and-corner fashion, for, if not tribal, at any rate separatist objects; but that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a Universal Brotherhood of Nations, a great Judaism, in fact, all the separate races and religions shall disappear...The new Constitution of the [Jewish] Board of Deputies marks an epoch in the history of that important institution...The real importance of the new Constitution is...that it provides a machinery for enabling the Jews of England to work together when the occasion requires, that in short it organizes the Jews of the whole Empire, and renders their aggregate force available in cases of emergency.“ (Jewish World, February 9 and 16, 1883).


„...We aspire to corrupt in order to attain to govern...We have corrupted too much...I begin to fear that we will not be able to stem the torrent we have let loose. There are insatiable passions of which I did not guess, unknown appetites, savage hatreds which ferment around and under us...It has been very easy to pervert; will it also always be easy to muzzle the perverts?...I am disturbed, for I am getting old, I have lost my illusions, I do not wish, poor and deluded of everything to assist as a theatrical supernumerary in the triumph which I have created and which would repudiate me by confiscating my fortune and taking off my head. We have gone too much to the extreme in many things. We have taken from the people all the gods of heaven and earth which had their homage. We have torn from them their religious faith, their faith in monarchy, their honesty and their family virtues, and we hear in the distance their sinister roarings. We tremble, for the monster may devour us...The world is cinched on the declivity of democracy, and for some time for me democracy has meant demagogy.

 „It is true that there is a distinct ‘Jewish idea’ in business and professional life which has eaten away the traditional principles of honor on which Anglo-Saxon life was erected. Every Jew knows that, every non-Jew knows it...It is true that beneath all the network of trivializing influences in literature, art, politics, economics, fashion, and sports, is Jewish influence controlled by Jewish groups. Their Orientalism has served as a subtle poison to dry up the sound serum of Anglo-Saxon morality on which this country thrived in its formative years.“ (The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem, Vol. IV, pp. 224-225).


„...the original mixed ancestry of the Jews and their subsequent history of intermixture with every people among whom they have lived and continue to live...“ (Ashley Montagu, Man’s Most Dangerous Myth, (1974) , p. 375).


„The word ‘ghetto’ is synonymous with the Jews: ‘ghetto, section of a city in which Jews lived. In the early Middle Ages their segregation in separate streets or localities was voluntary...The reason generally given for compulsory ghettos was that the faith of Christians would be weakened by the presence of Jews. Within the ghetto the inhabitants were usually autonomous, with their own courts of law and their own culture.“ (The Columbia Encyclopedia, 2nd Ed., (1950), p. 772).


„London became after Waterloo the money market and the clearing house of the world ...Every new economic enterprise of the British state appealed to the Jewish genius for commerce and especially for negotiation in its most abstract form - finance...The two things dovetailed one into the other and fitted exactly, and all subsidiary activities fitted in as well. The Jewish news agencies of the nineteenth century favored England in all her policy, political as well as commercial; they opposed those of her rivals and especially of her enemies. The Jewish knowledge of the East was at the service of England (Opium Wars, Indian Conquest). His international penetration of the European governments was also at her service, so was his secret information...The Jew might almost be called a British agent upon the Continent of Europe and still more in the Near and Far East...He was admitted to every institution in the State, a prominent member of his nation became chief officer of the English executive, and, an influence more subtle and penetrating, marriages began to take place, wholesale, between what had once been the aristocratic territorial families of this country and the Jewish commercial fortunes. After two generations of this, with the opening of the twentieth century those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception. In nearly all of them was the stain more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English name and the tradition those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family were taken for Jews whenever they travelled in countries where the gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed the admixture.“ (Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, pp. 222-223)


„There are two life-forces in the world I know: Jewish and gentile (non-Jewish), ours and yours...I do not believe that this primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York, 1924, pp. 19, 23).


„...don’t kill the farmer, he’s too valuable to us.“ (Jewish Motto).


„We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.“ (Goldwin Smith, Jewish Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, October, 1981)


„We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.“ (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).


„But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim.“ (Statement reported in a French Newspaper in 1773 after a meeting in the Rothschild home).


In an article by the Jew Victor Berger, one of the national leaders of the Socialist Party, wrote, in the Social Democratic Herald: „There can be no doubt that the Negroes and Mulattos constitute a lower race.“


Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels said Blacks: „...were people who ought to be eradicated and swept from the earth.“ (Karl Marx, by Nathaniel Weyl).


„Jews may adopt the customs and language of the countries where they live; but they will never become part of the native population.“ (The Jewish Courier, January 17, 1924).


„We are neither German, English or French. We are Jews and your Christian mentality is not ours.“ (Max Nordrow, a German Zionist Leader, in The Jewish World)


„The chief difficulty in writing about the Jewish Question is the super-sensitiveness of Jews and non-Jews concerning the whole matter. There is a vague feeling that even to openly use the word ‘Jew,’ or expose it nakedly to print is somehow improper. Polite evasions like ‘Hebrew’ and ‘Semite,’ both of which are subject to the criticism of inaccuracy, are timidly essayed, and people pick their way gingerly as if the whole subject were forbidden, until some courageous Jewish thinker comes straight out with the old old word ‘Jew,’ and then the constraint is relieved and the air cleared...A Jew is a Jew and as long as he remains within his perfectly unassailable traditions, he will remain a Jew. And he will always have the right to feel that to be a Jew, is to belong to a superior race. No one knows better than the Jew how widespread the notion that Jewish methods of business are all unscrupulous. No existing Gentile system of government is ever anything but distasteful to him. The Jew is against the Gentile scheme of things.

He is, when he gives his tendencies full sway, a Republican as against the monarchy, a Socialist as against the republic, and a Bolshevik as against Socialism. Democracy is all right for the rest of the world, but the Jew wherever he is found forms an aristocracy of one sort or another.“ (Henry Ford, Dearborn Independent)


„We are interested in just the opposite...in the diminution, the killing out of the Goyim.“ (Reportedly spoken by a Jewish speaker in the Rothschild home in 1773)


„We intend to remake the Gentiles -- what the Communists are doing in Russia.“ (Rabbi Lewish Brown in How Odd of God, New York, 1924)


„Let us recognize that we Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, or shade of belief, is necessarily a member. Organize, organize, until every Jew must stand up and be counted with us, or prove himself wittingly or unwittingly, of the few who are against their own people.“ (Louis B. Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1916-1939)


„I would willingly disenfranchise every Zionist. I would almost be tempted to proscribe the Zionist organizations as illegal and against the national interests...I have always recognized the unpopularity, much greater than some people think of my community. We [Jews] have obtained a far greater share of this country’s [England] goods and opportunities than we are numerically entitled to. We reach, on the whole, maturity earlier, and therefore with people of our own age we compete unfairly. Many of us have been exclusive in our friendships, and intolerable in our attitude, and I can easily understand that many a non-Jew in England wants to get rid of us.“ (Jewish-American Ambassador to India, Edwin Montague, The Zionist Connection, p. 737)


„You cannot be English Jews. We are a race, and only as a race can we perpetuate. Our mentality is of Edomitish character, and differs from that of an Englishman. Enough subterfuges! Let us assert openly that we are International Jews.“ (From the manifesto of the „World Jewish Federation,“ January 1, 1935, through its spokesperson, Gerald Soman).


„No one pretends that a Japanese or Indian child is English because it was born in England. The same applies to Jews.“ (Jewish World, London September 22, 1915)


„A Jew remains a Jew. Assimilalation is impossible, because a Jew cannot change his national character. Whatever he does, he is a Jew and remains a Jew. The majority has discovered this fact, but too late. Jews and Gentiles discover that there is no issue. Both believed there was an issue. There is none.“ (The Jews, Ludwig Lewisohn, in his book „Israel,“ 1926)


„When some Jews say that they consider themselves as a religious sect, like Roman Catholics or Protestants, they do not analyze correctly their own attitude and sentiments...Even if a Jew is baptized or, that which is not necessarily the same thing, sincerely converted to Christianity, it is rare if he is not still regarded as a Jew; his blood, his temperament and his spiritual particularities remain unchanged.“ (The Jew and the Nation, Ad. Lewis, the Zionist Association of West London; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 187)


„An energetic, lively and extremely haughty people, considering itself superior to all other nations, the Jewish race wished to be a Power. It had an instinctive taste for domination, since, by its origin, by its religion, by its quality of a chosen people which it had always attributed to itself [since the Babylonian Captivity], it believed itself placed above all others. To exercise this sort of authority the Jews had not a choice of means, gold gave them a power which all political and religious laws refuse them, and it was the only power which they could hope for. By holding this gold they became the masters of their masters, they dominated them and this was the only way of finding an outlet for their energy and their activity...The emancipated Jews entered into the nations as strangers...They entered into modern societies not as guests but as conquerors. They had been like a fenced-in herd. Suddenly the barriers fell and they rushed into the field which was opened to them. But they were not warriors...They made the only conquest for which they were armed, that economic conquest for which they had been preparing themselves for so many years...The Jew is the living testimony to the disappearance of the state which had as its basis theological principles, a State which anti-Semitic Christians dream of reconstructing. The day when a Jew occupied an administrative post the Christian State was in danger: that is true and the anti-smites who say that the Jew has destroyed the idea of the state could more justly say that the entry of Jews into society has symbolized the destruction of the state, that is to say the Christian State.“ (Bernard Lazare, L’Antisémitisme, pp. 223, 361; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 221-222)


„The most important and pregnant tenet of modern Jewish belief is that the Ger {goy - goyim}, or stranger, in fact all those who do not belong to their religion, are brute beasts, having no more rights than the fauna of the field.“ (Sir Richard Burton, The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam, p. 73)


„Jew and Gentile are two worlds, between you Gentiles and us Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf...There are two life forces in the world Jewish and Gentile...I do not believe that this primal difference between Gentile and Jew is reconcilable...The difference between us is abysmal...You might say: ‘Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.’ But the misfortune is that the two are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, pages 2, 19, 23, 30 and 95)


„The Jewish people, Rabbi Judah Halevy (the famous medieval poet and philosopher) explains in his ‘Kuzari,’ constitutes a separate entity, a species unique in Creation, differing from nations in the same manner as man differs from the beast or the beast from the plant...although Jews are physically similar to all other men, yet they are endowed [sic] with a ‘second soul’ that renders them a separate species.“ (Zimmer, Uriel, Torah- Judaism and the State of Israel, Congregation Kehillath Yaakov, Inc., NY, 5732 (1972), p. 12)


Actually it seems to serve their twisted purpose! The basis of this belief is All non Jews are subhuman and are to be exploited (milked or beeved). When these folks get Irate and try to fight back they naturally see the enemy as being all „Jews“ and not merely their Corrupt leaders.. Thus these leaders would use IaHUeH’s people as a shield to further their wicked ends. When attacked, the people tend to stick closer together.. According to what they are told to believe for a non-jew to confront a Jew is like Blasphemy... this makes it harder to Isolate the very Serious problem! It turns into a vicious cycle of destruction. And has caused the unnecessary Suffering and Death to Millions upon Millions of People...all for the benefit of a few.

It seems that the only effective Solution must come from the „Jewish“ people themselves.. but they still aren’t listening.. because they are told that whenever someone even so much as mentions „Multi-national Banker“ that it is because that person is an anti-semite and wants to Murder all „Jews“ everywhere! I wonder how many millions of dollars have been spent by the ADL to keep people from talking bad about these „Multi-National (Power hungry, moneygrabbing, slimball, Lying, Thieving, Murderous, Sons of Belial) Bankers“!!!

 ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937: „There is nothing else in Communism - a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a „paradise on earth.“

Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and what it means. It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is - a Jewish scheme invented by Jews - that it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string-puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews.“

The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht ...(„not wanted.“) „I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish...“


„The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability.“ (Minority Report: H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks)


Thursday, September 24, 2026

The Aryan Origins of the Atom Bomb

Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/the-aryan-origins-of-the-atom-bomb/

 

Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976), German physicist, teaching in 1936. Heisenberg was a founder of quantum physics, being awarded a Nobel Prize in 1932 for his matrix mechanics version of the theory of quantum physics. He developed the Uncertainty Principle in 1927. This stated that the more precisely the position of a sub-atomic particle is measured, the less precisely its momentum is known. This removed absolute determinacy (cause and effect) from physics, replacing it with statistical probability.

 

by Karl Radl

 

A Review of Carter Plymton Hydrick, 1998, ‘Critical Mass: The Real Story of the Birth of the Atom Bomb and the Atomic Age’, 1st Edition, Self-Published: USA

 

The subject of the Axis powers’ Atom Bomb research has recently received a significant amount of fresh intellectual attention with Dwight Rider and Eric Hehl recently arguing that the Thai-Burma Railway – made famous by the film ‘The Bridge over the River Kwai’ – was actually part of the Japanese Atomic Bomb research project.

 

Carter Hydrick’s book ‘Critical Mass: The Real Story of the Birth of the Atom Bomb and the Atomic Age’ deserves to be widely read not only because of its excellent scholarship and sceptical cross-checking of the stories of the participants of the Manhattan Project and the German atomic bomb research effort as well as primary sources.

 

Why with such serious and innovative scholarship was Hydrick’s book not published by a solid academic publisher or at least one of the smaller specialist publishers out there?

 

The answer to my mind lies in the fact that ‘Critical Mass’ is a book of two parts. The first section concerns the German and American Atomic Bomb race, but the second is a fantastical attempt to prove the survival of Martin Bormann – the head of NSDAP’s Party Chancellery and a key confident of Adolf Hitler – as well as the existence of the so-called ‘Bormann Brotherhood’ operating in South America.

 

This second intellectually toxic section to the book – largely a rehash of the theories of jewish historian Ladislas Farago’s book ‘Aftermath’ and American journalist Paul Manning’s ‘Martin Bormann’ – is almost certainly why publishers wouldn’t have wanted to handle it, because to associate their name with the ‘Bormann Brotherhood’ lunacy in the mid-to-late 1990s would have been damaging to the intellectual and public perception of their brand as well as have exposed them to significant (and serious) ridicule.

 

It is not uncommon for otherwise excellent books to have ridiculous chapters. For example, Adrian Weele’s otherwise excellent ‘Army of Evil: A History of the SS’ predictably has a chapter on the so-called ‘Holocaust’ but in it he repeats long discarded claims about homicidal gas chambers at the Dachau concentration camp as well as the myth of the shrunken heads and human skin lampshades as if they were an established fact rather than generally accepted among ‘Holocaust historians’ as being a historical nonsense.

 

Thus, if we discard the second part of Hydrick’s book and focus on the first part – they are in essence two books published together in my estimation – which is intellectually solid.

 

Hydrick’s argument is as complex as is his sourcing, but it boils down to a series of very simple and well-evidenced contentions:

 

A) The American Atomic Bomb project believed it was at least a year behind the Germans in terms of Atomic Bomb research by late 1942 (2) and in fact Germany was probably circa two years ahead at this point so it is very unlikely the American Atomic Bomb project could have caught up with the German Atomic Bomb project. (3)

 

B) That there were two separate German Atom Bomb projects with the one led by Werner Heisenberg and Carl-Friedrich von Weizsacker was funded by the Wehrmacht and hampered by its notorious bureaucracy (4) and a second run by the maverick physicist and inventor Baron Manfred von Ardenne funded directly by NSDAP and supervised by Wilhelm Ohnesorge – the Reich Minister of Post Affairs and member of the Reich President’s Council on Nuclear Affairs who was himself a noted mathematician and physicist – supported by Fritz Houtermans who was one of the first people to articulate thermo-nuclear theory in 1932. (5)

 

C) That Werner Heisenberg and Carl-Friedrich von Weizsacker systemically derided Baron Manfred von Ardenne’s work after the war because he wasn’t a formally trained academic as well as to cover up their own involvement with the Third Reich, but yet the latter developed a magnetic isotope separator in 1940 that had begun production by April 1942, which was four times more efficient than the method the Manhattan project would begin to use after the completion of their magnetic isotope separator at the Oak Ridge facility in the summer of 1944. (6) Also countering this is the fact that Baron Manfred von Ardenne’s process is still used today as the best source of particle rays and ion plasma. (7)

 

D) That Auschwitz’s important synthetic rubber plant that was to be run by I.G. Farben but which famously never produced any actual synthetic rubber yet cost huge amounts of money ($250 million which is suspiciously similar to the $240 million cost of the US’ Oak Ridge enrichment facility), employed 25,000 workers and allegedly took 4 and a half years to build while using more electricity than the entire city of Berlin [synthetic rubber doesn’t require electricity to produce it] was actually the main German uranium enrichment plant and the site of Baron Manfred von Ardenne’s centrifuges. (8)

 

E) That the German submarine U-234 was captured by the United States in June 1945 while transporting the refined uranium and associated devices – such as infra-red fuses – with German specialists on their way to Japan and its capture was covered up to make the Manhattan Project – whose own estimates were that they wouldn’t have enough enriched uranium to make one atom bomb by November/December 1945 or early 1946 at the earliest, but suddenly acquired enough to make two devices in June 1945 as well as the required detonators that they didn’t have previously. (9)

 

This contention is backed up by Baron Manfred von Ardenne’s later centrality to the Soviet and East German Atomic Bomb research effort (10) as well as the ‘Holocaust historians’ conundrum surrounding I.G. Farben’s directors ‘not knowing’ what the SS were allegedly doing at Auschwitz even though they would have had to as well as the fact that the ‘Buna Inmates’ [i.e., those working in the synthetic rubber factory at Auschwitz] seem to have often held doctorates. (11)

 

Hydrick’s ‘Critical Mass’ has the kind of intuitive sense to it that often accompanies a historical theory that suddenly causes a lot of different facts to click together and make an eerie sort of sense all of a sudden (for example Hitler’s regular visits to Baron Manfred von Ardenne’s laboratory in Berlin and the famous later push by Hitler to develop and use ‘Wonder Weapons’ that would change the course of the war). The beauty of Hydrick’s thesis underlies the fundamental tragedy of it in that the Third Reich and German science deserves the credit for being the true creators of the Atom Bomb, but this credit was stolen by the jewish ‘former’ Communist Robert Oppenheimer and his fame hungry boss Major General Leslie Groves.

 

Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.


References

 

(1) Dwight Rider, Eric Hehl, 2020, ‘Railway of Infinite Regret: Uranium on the Thai-Burma Railway. 1943-1945’ (https://www.academia.edu/43421086/Railway_of_Infinite_Regret_Uranium_on_the_Thai_Burma_Railway_1943_1945)

 

(2) Carter Plymton Hydrick, 1998, ‘Critical Mass: The Real Story of the Birth of the Atom Bomb and the Atomic Age’, 1st Edition, Self-Published: USA, p. 46

 

(3) Ibid., p. 43

 

(4) Ibid., p. 55

 

(5) Ibid., pp. 49; 54; 55-56; 58-59; 145

 

(6) Ibid., pp. 56; 75

 

(7) Ibid., pp. 45; 49; 55-56

 

(8) Ibid., pp. 49-51; 66-70

 

(9) Ibid., pp. 14-15; 22-23; 25; 84-85; 88

 

(10) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manfred_von_Ardenne#In_the_Soviet_Union

 

(11) Jurgen Graf, 2001, ‘The Giant with Feet of Clay: Raul Hilberg and his Standard Work on the “Holocaust”’, 1st Edition, Theses & Dissertations Press: Capshaw, pp. 72-74

 

via Karl Radl’s Substack

 

Thursday, September 17, 2026

Inconvenient History - Volume 14

 

DOWNLOAD THE BOOK IN PDF FORMAT.

 

Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern warfare.

Monday, September 14, 2026

New World Order - Communism by the Backdoor - Part 8


By Denis Wise

 

Hollywood: the modern-day Babylon. The Hollywood motion picture industry is the most important vehicle of propaganda in the English-speaking world today. In the long run Hollywood exerts a greater influence over the English-speaking peoples than all other propaganda mediums combined. It has therefore become a prime target for communist infiltration. And since the film industry is overwhelmingly Jewish, it was a minimum of difficulty in setting up shop.

Saturday, September 12, 2026

Jewish Losses During World War II

Source: https://codoh.com/library/document/jewish-losses-during-world-war-ii/

 

On the dispute between Giuseppe Fallisi and Vincent Reynouard

Last updated on September 2, 2026

 

On August 7, 2026, French revisionist Vincent Reynouard posted a video titled “The Number of Jews Who Disappeared between 1941 and 1945. A Response to my Accusers” (“Nombre de juifs disparus entre 1941 et 1945. Réponse à mes accusateurs”). In it, Reynouard discusses the Jewish death toll during the time of the alleged Holocaust, while also addressing accusation made against him by some critics, foremost among them Italian activist Guiseppe Fallisi. In the following text, Italian revisionist Carlo Mattogno discusses Reynouard’s presentation on Jewish wartime population statistics.

 

I state that I express my point of view on the issue on the express invitation of the manager of Andrea Carancini’s Blog.

 

First of all, it should be made clear that considering Reynouard a sort of “traitor” passed to the “enemy,” as Fallisi seems to have done, is frankly ridiculous. On the contrary, he should be praised and thanked for the enormous revisionist work he has produced, and in particular for the excellent, well-documented compendium SHOAH: Une synthèse après trente ans de travaux, published by him in PDF and also as a documentary, which is essentially dedicated to the demolition of the history of “extermination camps” and “gas chambers”, drawing on all the best revisionist literature available and on his own research.

 

Chart on Jewish population statistics, taken from V. Reynouard’s ebook SHOAH: Une synthèse après trente ans de travaux, p. 223.

 

The question of the “Jewish Victims of the Shoah”, which is summarized in a graph on p. 223 of his book, is in my opinion completely marginal, because – in principle – even if the number of victims were really 6 million, this would not automatically demonstrate the reality of a planned extermination plan and implemented in gas chambers. This is also explained clearly by Reynouard:

 

“’The missing 6 million in 1945 demonstrate the existence of this plan [of extermination].’ We answer: ‘No, this estimate has no relationship with reality. Between one and three million Jews died in the camps, ghettos and the East because of the Germans. The question is: have they been massacred within the framework of a systematic extermination plan, or have they been victims of circumstances related, in one way or another, to war?” (p. 228)

 

Mr Reynouard proposed the following ‘General budget (very approximate)’ of Jewish losses:

 

“– 8 million pre-war Jews in what was to be the German sphere of influence
– survivors in 1945: between 3.5 and 5 million;
– disappeared: between 3 and 4.5 million” (p. 223)

 

Much can be discussed about the distribution of these victims that appears in the above chart, and I will do so at the end of this article, but that is not the problem. The important fact is that the chart is based on a statistical study by Germar Rudolf[1] that comes precisely to the following conclusion:[2]

 

“According to our calculations, 3.46 to 5 million of them [Jews] survived the ‘Holocaust,’ and 3.1 to 4.64 million did not.”

 

He also stated:[3]

 

“Consequently, the number of possible real Holocaust victims – according to official data provided by Israel – is probably less than 3 or even 2 million Jews.”

 

Reynouard distinguishes between the Shoah on the one hand, which for him is the catastrophe that Jews suffered during World War II, in practice their persecution, and the Holocaust on the other hand, which is to be understood as the claimed systematic and planned extermination.

 

In my opinion, in a possible statistic, it would be necessary to introduce the categories of “died” (for whatever cause), “murdered” and “disappeared,” all of which fall into the general category of “losses.”

 

For example, the victims of the concentration camps and ghettos fall into the category of those who simply “died,” while victims of the Einsatzgruppen were “murdered,” and deportees who passed through the camps of Action Reinhard and Chełmno have “disappeared.” In my book “The “Operation Reinhardt” Camps Treblinka, Sobibór, Bełżec: Black Propaganda, Archeological Research, Expected Material Evidence” (Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, UK, 2021), I explained and demonstrated in abundance why they cannot be considered “murdered.”

 

All assessments of Jewish losses inevitably start from two data: the number of Jews present in what was to become National Socialist-occupied Europe in the pre-war (1939) and the post-war period (1945). However, these numbers are not as certain as is believed. The result of these calculations varies according to the sources used. This is striking that, for Gerald Reitlinger, Jewish losses range from a minimum of 4,194,200 to a maximum of 4,581,000,[4] while Raul Hilberg wrote about 5,100,000.[5]

 

According to Danuta Dąbrowska, Stanisław Waszak, Henryk Grynberg, 2,642,000 Jews lived in Poland in 1939; Peter-Heinz Seraphim indicated the figure of 2,719,000; Eugene Kulisher and Malcolm Proudfoot relied on that of 2,845,000;[6] Hilberg preferred the figure of 3,351,000.[7] Already these data involve a maximum difference of 709,000 people, who can be considered or not “victims” depending on the choice of the sources you adopt.

 

Regarding the losses related to Poland and the Soviet Union, Wolfgang Benz, who assumes 2,700,000 deaths for the former and 2,100,000 for the latter, recalls in the introductory paragraph “Realistic Assessments” of the book he coordinated[8] that the relative minimum and maximum figures adduced by G. Reitlinger and the Yad Vashem Institute are 2,350,000-2,600,000 and 1,211,500-1,316,500, respectively, with a minimum difference of 883,500 and a maximum of 1,238,500, which, even in this case, may or may not be considered victims. These great differences depend simply on the numerical data of departure chosen and the methods adopted.

 

The problem of the number of survivors in 1945 is even more complicated. First of all, the mythical-symbolic character of the 6-million victims should be kept in mind, as was well-documented by Thomas Dalton, who turned his attention to multiple articles published by the New York Times from 1869 to 1938, according to which the Jews of Central and Eastern Europe, invariably 6 million, always appeared threatened with extermination by hunger and disease.[9]

 

On June 25, 1940, the New York Times reported the following statement by Nahum Goldmann, President of the World Jewish Congress:[10]

 

“Six million Jews in Europe are condemned to destruction if the victory of the Nazis were to be final.”

 

This figure was repeated by Jewish propaganda throughout the war. Reynouard refers to articles of newspapers of November 1944 that informed about the publication of the Soviet Black Book, in which the figure of 6 million was consecrated (p. 218). Post-war statistics were compiled to “prove” this propaganda assumption. No statistician dared to explicitly cite the figure of 6 million victims – this would have been too brazen! ‒ but everyone approached it with considerable approximation.

 

The statistics relating to surviving Jews in the post-war period, even assuming very charitably that they were not rigged for the above reason, cannot be trusted.

 

In the article “Losses of the Jewish Population in the German Sphere of Influence during World War II,”[11] Jürgen Graf, commenting on Germar Rudolf’s above-mentioned study, put forward compelling arguments on this point:

 

“Benz’s basic assumption is that every Jew who no longer lived in 1945 in the place where s/he had lived until 1939 was murdered by the Germans.”

 

The specialists Benz coordinated did not take into account the territorial changes that occurred after the end of the Second World War. The most important cases, Graf continues, are those of Poland, Hungary and Romania:

 

“Poland lost its eastern provinces, where Jews had been particularly numerous, in favor of the Soviet Union. In return, it acquired vast German territories in the West, where few Jews lived before the war.

 

Hungary acquired Romanian, Czechoslovak and Yugoslav territories, only to lose them again in 1945. Romania was forced in 1940 to cede Bessarabia to the Soviet Union. Now, Jews who lived in these respective areas and who died during the war, really or presumably, are counted by Benz twice. Thus, 100,000 Jews from Bessarabia who, according to Benz, were exterminated by the Germans and their Romanian allies, appear twice in the statistics of the victims.

 

G. Rudolf showed that this double count yielded about 533,000 fictitious victims.

 

But the problem also concerns the survivors, as is clearly evident from the method used to determine their numbers.

 

In France, those who showed up in 1945 at the Ministry of Former Fighters were considered survivors.[12] In Poland, the general list of Jewish survivors was compiled on 15 June 1945 by the Centralny Komitet ͐Żydów Polskich (Central Committee of Polish Jews).[13] It is clear that, in order to be registered, they too had to present themselves to some ministry. And it can be considered well founded that such a practice was customary throughout Europe. But how many survivors preferred not to return to their country of origin? And how many preferred not to go and declare that they were alive?

 

Among the approximately 75,700 Jews deported from France, about 26,300 were Polish, 7,000 Germans, 4,500 Russians, 3,300 Romanians, 2,500 Austrians, 1,200 Hungarians:[14] can you imagine that the survivors of the deportations in 1945 rushed to return to France to be declared alive by the competent ministry?

 

And the surviving Polish Jews of Galicia (where Lwów/Lemberg is located), which was incorporated into the Soviet Union, went to Warsaw to be registered as being alive?

 

The changes in religion or identity of survivors, which applies in particular to the Soviet Union, should also be considered. As J. Graf found:

 

“According to the 1939 census, there were 3.02 million Jews in the Soviet Union. The first post-war census, which took place in 1959, provided a figure of just 2.26 million Jews, but all Western Zionists agree that this figure was unrealistically low. According to Soviet practice, every citizen could choose for himself which nationality to belong to, and a considerable part of Soviet Jews was already assimilated: they considered themselves as Russians, Ukrainians etc. Moreover, at that time, the political atmosphere was not particularly favorable to Jews, so many of them preferred not to be identified as such.”

 

To this is added the emigration of the immediate post-war period, especially to Palestine, the countries of Latin America, the United States and other English-speaking countries.

 

In this regard, J. Graf mentions an emblematic case:

 

“A short article that appeared on November 24, 1978 in an American newspaper The State Time (Baton Rouge, Louisiana), illustrates better than long and complicated statistics what really happened to the missing Jews:

 

‘The Steinbergs once lived in a small village in Poland. This was before the camps of Hitler’s death. Now more than 200 survivors dispersed to the world and their descendants are gathered here to share a special four-day celebration that appropriately began Thanksgiving. Relatives came Thursday from Canada, France, England, Argentina, Colombia, Israel and at least 13 U.S. cities. ‘It’s fabulous,’ said Iris Krasnow of Chicago. ‘There are five generations here – from three months of age to 85. People are celebrating and having a wonderful time. It’s almost like a World War II refugee meeting.’’”

 

To conclude, the statistics relating to Jews in 1939 are somewhat dubious, while those relating to 1945 are extremely dubious; therefore, any statistics based on this comparative method are rather unreliable.

 

Returning to Reynouard, while his absolute numbers were taken from Germar Rudolf, their breakdown is conjectural and moreover unfounded. Reynouard proposes a lower estimate of 3 million victims, and an upper one of 4 and a half million. The victims are divided into 6 identical categories, plus a seventh (1,500,000 victims), which applies only to the upper estimate and concerns “Disappeared in the East… in camps and ghettos, in pogroms…” It is unclear where this figure comes from and why he excluded it from the lower estimate.

 

The other 6 categories are:

 

1) “in the hands of the Soviets: about 1 million”. Even here it is not known where this figure comes from and what it means: how and why did these Jews die? In this regard, consider the following observation of the commander of the Einsatzgruppe C in the “Ereignismeldung” (event report) No. 81 of 12 September 1941:[15]

 

“While in the first weeks there were still Jews in large numbers, in the territories of central and eastern Ukraine it was possible to see that in many cases 70-90% of the Jewish population had fled, in some cases 100%. In this we can see an indirect result of the work of the Security Police, since the gratuitous expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Jews – for the most part, according to interrogations, beyond the Urals – represents a considerable contribution to the solution of the Jewish question in Europe.”

 

But Soviet territories were also the destination of the Jews who passed through the transit camps (see below, Point 4), more than 1,400,000 of them, so the number of Jews who passed alive “in the hands of the Soviets” should be around 2 million.

 

2) “Einsatzgruppen: 400,000.” Reynouard practically rounds up the proposed figure of Siegfried Verbeke (387,000, p. 439), but also reports my count in my study on the Einsatzgruppen: 727,871 victims, of which 274,149 are recorded in the reports without indication of place and date; from this, rounding the digits, he calculates the number of 750,000 – 270,000 = 480,000 victims, which would confirm the Verbeke’s figure (p. 443).

 

In my study, when discussing the above figure of 727,871, I stated:

 

“The unverifiable data are therefore 40.7% of the total figure! To these problems is added that of the exaggerations, because, even if the executions are reported with precise date and place, in most cases there is no certainty that the figures indicated are accurate.”

 

For this reason, I concluded, “the only way to assess the reliability of the figures in the Ereignismeldungen [the Einsatzgruppen‘s event reports] remains the examination of the findings of corpses and/or their destruction in the framework of the so-called ‘Aktion 1005,’”[16] a theme to which I have dedicated a special volume, in which I have examined in detail the alleged activity of all the “Sonderkommandos” of the alleged “Aktion 1005” (the exhumation of bodies from mass graves and their cremation on open-air pyres), eyewitness accounts, Soviet reports and photographic evidence, and I have come to the following conclusion (Point 4):[17]

 

“Between the figures of the executions proclaimed in the various German reports and the number of corpses actually found [and supposedly cremated] there is such an immense disproportion that it can reasonably be considered that they are far exaggerated.”

 

A report dated September 12, 1941 clearly shows that the Einsatzgruppen did not have as their main task the killing all the Jews they encountered, so the numerical exaggerations in these reports cannot be due to their eagerness to appear before their Berlin superiors as particularly efficient exterminators.

 

3) “Miscellaneous reasons (combats casualties, bombings, hostages…): 700,000.” This figure is disproportionate. According to the Yad Vashem Institute, about 240,000 Jewish soldiers died in battle, about 200,000 of them within the Red Army,[18] so it is not realistic to hypothesize 460,000 victims for bombing and hostage killings.

 

4) “Transit camps: 300,000.” For Reynouard, the camps of Bełżec, Sobibór, Treblinka and Chełmno were transit camps. Here the only toehold could be mainstream Holocaust historian Dieter Pohl, according to whom up to 5% of the deportees could die of hardship during the journey.[19] Since some 1,420,000 Jews were deported to these camps according to the Korherr Report, this would amount to approximately 71,000 deaths. How did Reynouard get to 300,000?

 

5) “Concentration and labor camps: 300,000.” This is another decidedly exaggerated figure. German orthodox historian Karin Orth wrote:[20]

 

“At least one-third of the more than 700,000 inmates registered in concentration camps in January 1945 died, perhaps even half, in death marches or mass mortality of the camps; the percentage of Jewish inmates among the dead was high.”

 

The death toll resulting from this would therefore have been 230,000-350,000 inmates. Even assuming that this estimate is well-founded, how many of these deaths were Jews? In this regard, there is no complete data, but some significant examples serve to give an idea of the order of magnitude.

 

In their analysis of the Sterbebücher (death records) of Auschwitz, Thomas Grotus and Jan Parcer found that, out of a total of 68,384 deaths documented between 1941 and 1943, those of Jews were 29,125, or 42.6%.[21] On 21 August 1944, 104,891 registered prisoners were in Auschwitz, 45,876 of them Jewish (43.7%).[22] In addition, there were some 30,000 unregistered Jews in the transit section (Durchgangslager). However, as a rule, they remained there only for a few days before getting transferred to other camps. Therefore, the mortality of Jewish prisoners was reasonably less than 50% of the total deaths toll, which was about 135,500.[23]

 

As noted in the Mauthausen Camp’s death records, Jewish inmates who died in this camp between 1938 and 1945 numbered 14,356 out of a total of 68,874,[24] hence about 21% of the total. It is therefore highly unlikely that the number of Jewish deaths in concentration camps reached 50% of the alleged 350,000 mentioned above, i.e. 175,000 deaths. The labor camps cannot have caused the remaining 125,000 deaths, so the 300,000 figure is also blatantly unfounded.

 

6) “Ghettos: 300,000.” It seems obvious to me that Reynouard refers to the Polish ghettos, because the Baltic and Soviet ones already fall into what I have indicated as the seventh category (“Disappeared in the East… in camps and ghettos, in pogroms…”). But, according to the orthodox Holocaust narrative, many of the Einsatzgruppen’s victims came from the ghettos, who are therefore counted twice.

 

The two largest ghettos – those of Warsaw and Lodz, which had a maximum number of about 400,000 and 160,000 residents, respectively ‒ recorded 69,355 deaths in Warsaw in the period January 1941 to June 1942,[25] and 47,372 in Lodz from 1938 to August 1944,[26] hence a total of 116,727. For the remaining ghettos ‒ very numerous but also much smaller ‒ there no data exists; most of them moreover suffered drastic population reductions in the second half of 1942 due to deportations to the eastern camps, so it is not realistic that there were about 183,000 people missing to get to 300,000. This figure therefore remains conjectural.

 

In conclusion, from a revisionist perspective, it is easy to accept (on the basis of the uncertain assumptions set out above) a death toll of 3 or 4.5 million Jews. The challenge is to explain how and where they died.


Endnotes

 

[1] In: G. Rudolf (Ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust. The Growing Critique of “Truth“Truth” and “Memory”.” Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago, 2003, pp. 181-213 (pp. 171-202 in the current, 4th edition of 2024).

 

[2] Idem, p. 210 (2024 edition: p. 199).

 

[3] Ibid.

 

[4] G. Reitlinger, La Soluzione Finale. Il tentativo di sterminio degli Ebrei d’Europa 1939-1945. Il Saggiatore, Milan, 1965, p. 612.

 

[5] R. Hilberg, La distruzione degli Ebrei d’Europa. Giulio Einaudi editore. Turin, 1995, p. 1319.

 

[6] F. Golczewski, “Polen,” in: Wolfgang Benz (edited by), Dimension des Völkersmords. Oldenbourg, Munich, 1991, p. 419.

 

[7] R. Hilberg, La distruzione degli Ebrei d’Europa, p. 1313.

 

[8] The work was written by 17 specialists from individual countries under the supervision of Benz. To simplify, I refer to Benz as the author.

 

[9] T. D. Dalton, Debating the Holocaust. A New Look at the Both Sides. Theses & Dissertations Press. New York, 2009, pp. 50-56.

 

[10] The New York Times, June 25, 1940, p. 4.

 

[11] Historia Magistra Vitae / Chapter 10, pp. 109-117. Can be purchased online at: https://www.lulu.com/shop/j%C3%BCrgen-graf/historia-magistra-vitae/paperback/product-1z424zk8.html? page=1&pageSize=4

 

[12] S. Klarsfeld, Le mémorial de la déportation des Juifs de France, édité et publié par Beate et Serge Klarsfeld, Paris, 1978, p. 10 (my numbering).

 

[13] ‘Statystyka ludności żydowskiej w Polsce’, in: Biuletyn Głównej Komisji Badania Zbrodni Niemieckich w Polsce, Vol. I, 1946, p. 203.

 

[14] S. Klarsfeld, Le mémorial de la déportation des Juifs de France, p. 23.

 

[15] Klaus-Michael Mallmann, Andrej Angrick, Jürgen Matthäus, Martin Cüppers (edited by), “Die Ereignismeldungen UdSSR 1941”. Dokumente der Einsatzgruppen in der Sowjetunion I. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 2011, p. 452.

 

[16] Gli Einsatzgruppen nei territori orientali occupati. Genesi, compiti e attività. Vol. I. Effepi, Genoa, 2016, pp. 257f. For the English edition, see https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the-einsatzgruppen-in-the-occupied-eastern-territories/

 

[17] Gli Einsatzgruppen nei territori orientali occupati. L’“Azione 1005.” Vol. II. Effepi, Genoa, 2017. vol. II, p. 335.

 

[18] Jewish Soldiers in the Allied Armies, online at https://www.yadvashem.org/holocaust/about/combat-resistance/jewish-soldiers.html

 

[19] D. Pohl, “Massentötungen durch Giftgas im Rahmen der ‘Aktion Reinhardt’: Aufgaben der Forschung” in: Günter Morsch, Betrand Perz (ed.), Neue Studien zu nationalsozialistischen Massentötungen durch Giftgas: Historische Bedeutung, technische Entwicklung, revisionistische Leugnung. Metropol, Berlin, 2011, p. 194.

 

[20] K. Orth, “The Genesis and Structure of the National Socialist Concentration Camps,” in: Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945. Vol. 1, Part A. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 2009, p. 194.

 

[21] T. Grotum, J. Parcer, “EDV-gestützte Auswertung der Sterbeeinträge”, in: Staatliches Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau (ed.), Sterbebücher von Auschwitz. G. Saur, Munich/New Providence/London/Paris, 1995, p. 249.

 

[22] Archive of the Central Commission of Inquiry on Crimes against the Polish People – National Memorial. NTN, 155, pp. 96 and 115.

 

[23] See my book Auschwitz: Trasporti, Forza, Mortalità. Effepi, Genoa, 2019, p. 276. For the English edition, see https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the-real-auschwitz-chronicle/, Vol. 2.

 

[24] H. Marsalek, Mauthausen. La Pietra, Milan, 1977, pp. 115 and 204.

 

[25] T. Berenstein, A. Eisenbach, B. Mark, A. Rutkowski, Faschismus – Getto – Massenmord: Dokumentation über Ausrottung und Widerstand der Juden in Polen während des zweiten Weltkrieges. Röderberg Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1960, pp. 138f.

 

[26] J. Baranowski, The Łódź Ghetto 1940-1944. Vademecum. Archiwum Państwowe w Łodzi & Bilbo, Łódź, 1999, p. 86.