The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Thursday, November 30, 2023
Monday, November 27, 2023
Zionism – Part II
„World War II was a Zionist plot to make way for the foundation of the Jewish State in Palestine.“ (Joseph Burg, an anti-Zionist Jew).
„Zionism was willing to sacrifice the whole of European Jewry for a Zionist State. Everything was done to create a state of Israel and that was only possible through a world war. Wall Street and Jewish large bankers aided the war effort on both sides. Zionists are also to blame for provoking the growing hatred for Jews in 1988.“ (Joseph Burg, The Toronto Star, March 31, 1988).
„He received me not only cordially, but he was also full of confidence with respect to the war. His first words, after he had welcomed me, were as follows: ‘Well, Dr. Weismann, we have as good as beaten them already.’ I...thanked him for his constant support for the Zionist course. ‘You were standing at the cradle of this enterprise.’ I said to him, ‘and hopefully you will live to see that we have succeeded.’ Adding that after the war we would build up a state of three to four million Jews in Palestine, whereupon he replied: ‘Yes, go ahead, I am full in agreement with this idea.’„ (Conversation between Chaim Weismann and Winston Churchill).
„Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rings of a ladder leading upward and upward...The Zionist Congress; the English Uganda proposition; the future World War; the Peace Conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.“ (Max Nordau, 6th Zionist Congress in Balse, Switzerland, 1903)
„Now, in answer to the question would we use force in the Middle East. I don’t know...I hope not. We have no plans to, it is conceivable, I guess. It would be almost as bad as the seven days in May. You conjure up a situation where there is another oil embargo, and the people in this country are not only inconvenienced and uncomfortable, but suffer.“ (General George S. Brown)
„2.2 billion worth of military equipment had been stripped from U.S. Forces in West Germany and America and shipped to Israel in an unprecedented day and night airlift.“ (General George S. Brown, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff and top American military leader, made the statement at Duke University in November 1974).
„Very odd things are happening in Israel. Our observers were struck with the peculiar attitude of those travelling to Zion after the war. They seemed to see some strange sign which they could not help following at whatever cost. We heard this over and over again. These strange people saw something.“ (Review of World Affairs)
„We told the authorities in London; we shall be in Palestine whether you want us there or not. You may speed up or slow down our coming, but it would be better for you to help us, otherwise our constructive force will turn into a destructive one that will bring about ferment in the entire world.“ (Judishe Rundschau, #4, 1920, Germany, by Chaim Weismann, a Zionist leader)
„Ma’aser is the tenth part of tithe of his capital and income which every Jew has naturally been obligated over the generations of their history to give for the benefit of Jewish movements...The tithe principle has been accepted in its most stringent form. The Zionist Congress declared it as the absolute duty of every Zionist to pay tithes to the Ma’aser. It added that those Zionists who failed to do so, should be deprived of their offices and honorary positions.“ (Encyclopedia Judaica)
„The Zionist Organization is a body unique in character, with practically all the functions and duties of a government, but deriving its strength and resources not from one territory but from some seventy-two different countries...The supreme government is in the hands of the Zionist Congress, composed of over 200 delegates, representing shekel-payers of all countries. Congress meets once every two years. Its [supreme government] powers between sessions are then delegated to the Committee [Sanhedrin].“ (Report submitted to the Zionist Conference at Sydney, Australia, by Mr. Ettinger, a Zionist Lawyer)
„When a Jew in America or South Africa speaks of ‘our Government’ to his fellow Jews, he usually means the Government of Israel, while the Jewish public in various countries view Israeli ambassadors as their own representatives.“ (Israel Government Yearbook, 1953-54, p. 35)
„Israel controls the Senate...around 80 percent are completely in support of Israel; anything Israel wants. Jewish influence in the House of Representatives is even greater.“ (They Dare to Speak Out, Paul Findley, p. 66, speaking of a statement of Senator J. William Fulbright said in 1973)
„The world Zionist movement is big business. In the first two decades after Israel’s precarious birth in 1948 it channeled an estimated four billion dollars in donations into the country. Following the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, the Zionists raised another $730-million in just two years. This year, 1970, the movement is seeking five hundred million dollars. Gottlieb Hammar, chief Zionist money raiser, said, ‘When the blood flows, the money flows.’” (Lawrence Mosher, National Observer, May 18, 1970)
„I know I don’t have to say this, but in bringing everybody under the Zionist banner we never forget that our goals are the safety and security of the state of Israel foremost. Our goal will be realized in Yiddishkeit, in a Jewish life being lived every place in the world and our goals will have to be realized, not merely by what we impel others to do. And here in this country it means frequently working through the umbrella of the President’s Conference [of Jewish organizations], or it might be working in unison with other groups that feel as we do. But that, too, is part of what we think Zionism means and what our challenge is.“ (Rabbi Israel Miller, The American Jewish Examiner, p. 14, On March 5, 1970)
„I am a Zionist.“ (Jerry Falwell, Old Time Gospel Hour, 1/27/85)
„You Israeli you should never become lenient if you would kill your enemies. You shall have no pity on them until you shall have destroyed all their so-called Arab culture, on the ruins of which we shall build our own civilization.“ (Menachin Begin, October 28, 1956, at a Conference in Tel Aviv)
„The League of Nations is a Jewish idea. We created it after a fight of 25 years. Jerusalem will one day become the Capital of World Peace.“ (Nahum Sokolow, During the Zionist Congress at Carlsbad in 1922)
Friday, November 24, 2023
The Burning Question: Was 10/7 A False Flag?
Source: http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-burning-question-was-10-7-a-false-flag/
The October 7th Hamas attack on Israelis has been referred to as “Israel’s 9/11,” which gives us good reason to believe that it was probably another false flag psy-op.
Some people really do believe it was a false flag, i.e., that the Israeli regime allegedly knew that it was being planned and let it happen.
As Paul Craig Roberts notes, how could Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency not know this was being planned? Don’t Israeli intelligence and military have the most sophisticated and comprehensive monitoring and surveillance of the Israeli sheeple and of Palestinians and of Hamas?
The planning allegedly was going on for 2 years. Really?
And there were warnings from other countries or intelligence agencies, including Egypt who had warned the Israelis of a terrorist attack being planned, warnings ignored.
In any event, the official narrative of “surprise” attack is just not believable. A possible motive for a false flag op as reported by Jonathan Cook is a planned expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza to Sinai which is controlled by Egypt, an ethnic cleansing plan allegedly under way since at least 2007, according to Cook.
Many people dismiss such allegations as “conspiracy theory.” But would it really be that surprising that government-employed losers would intentionally allow a terrorist attack to occur, and for the sake of implementing a plan of ethnic cleansing of an entire population whose presence is inconvenient?
After all, government bureaucracies generally attract psychopaths. The worst of the worst, as F.A. Hayek had noted.
And now we are learning that there is a high probability that many of the Israelis killed on October 7th were killed by the Israeli military (IDF) itself, possibly as high as 80% of the Israeli deaths, according to Scott Ritter. And Ron Unz described the IDF as possibly “trigger-happy Apache pilots”. It has also been difficult for Israeli authorities to distinguish between many killed Israeli and Palestinian bodies.
But there is some history that is important here. The fact that Israel contributed to the creation of the Hamas organization is quite relevant to the allegation of false flag ops.
Justin Raimondo noted that the Israelis promoted the organization that later became Hamas for the purposes of discouraging Palestinians from supporting the Palestine Liberation Organization and Yasser Arafat as well as to cause blowback.
In a conscious effort to undermine the Palestine Liberation Organization and the leadership of Yasser Arafat, in 1978 the government of then-Prime Minister Menachem Begin approved the application of Sheik Ahmad Yassin to start a “humanitarian” organization known as the Islamic Association, or Mujama. The roots of this Islamist group were in the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood, and this was the seed that eventually grew into Hamas – but not before it was amply fertilized and nurtured with Israeli funding and political support.
Begin and his successor, Yitzhak Shamir, launched an effort to undercut the PLO, creating the so-called Village Leagues, composed of local councils of handpicked Palestinians who were willing to collaborate with Israel – and, in return, were put on the Israeli payroll. Sheik Yassin and his followers soon became a force within the Village Leagues. This tactical alliance between Yassin and the Israelis was based on a shared antipathy to the militantly secular and leftist PLO: the Israelis allowed Yassin’s group to publish a newspaper and set up an extensive network of charitable organizations, which collected funds not only from the Israelis but also from Arab states opposed to Arafat.
…
This “blowback” principle applies to Hamas not only insofar as Israel was involved in funding and encouraging Mujama, but also, after the consolidation of Hamas as an armed group, due to Israeli military policy. The much-touted “withdrawal,” which amounts to Israel giving up Gaza while strengthening its hand elsewhere in the occupied territories, has been grist for the radical Islamist mill, as has the Wall of Separation and the attempt to quash the vote in East Jerusalem. Israel’s relentless offensive against its perceived enemies – first Fatah, now Hamas and Islamic Jihad – has created a backlash and solidified support for fundamentalist extremist factions in the Palestinian community.
Besides the Israeli regime helping to foster an Islamic extremist terrorist group, Hamas, Al-Qaeda was also partially trained and funded by CIA.
See “MI6 ‘halted bid to arrest bin Laden’” on the Guardian and “Mainstream Media Finally Reports on U.S. Funding of Terror” on The New American for info.
Those examples of government-employed buffoonery have been a decades-long part of Western governments’ history of exploiting the more primitive Islamic cultures toward the end of Western regimes’ foreign policy goal of “creating monsters to destroy” to justify the expansion of the national security (sic) state and all its tax-funded largess.
Another example, in 2017 Islamic State or ISIS claimed responsibility for the London stabbing attack that killed 8 and injured 48 people. According to British historian Mark Curtis, author of Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion with Radical Islam, one of the 3 attackers had allegedly been “trained by U.K. and U.S. ‘liaison’ officers,” as part of a “covert” op in Libya, as other terrorists get trained to fight in Syria against the regimes the U.S. and U.K governments don’t like. Western regimes train would-be terrorists, who then go on to commit acts of … terrorism. And on and on.
So Western government bureaucrats, especially in the U.S. and U.K., have a history of radicalizing Muslims. As I wrote in this 2017 blog post,
In this article, Curtis states that the Manchester bombing was blowback from “overt and covert actions of British governments.” And Nafeez Ahmed in this article says that the “terrorists who rampaged across London on the night of 3 June were part of a wider extremist network closely monitored by MI5 for decades. The same network was heavily involved in recruiting Britons to fight with jihadist groups in Syria, Iraq and Libya.”
You see, this government bureaucrat-type of idiocy, attempting to manipulate and control hostile factions in society, seems to result in blowback.
Do bureaucrats never learn from their past mistakes? Or do “intelligence” and “national security” bureaucrats just like blowback?
Why would bureaucrats like blowback? Because of the bureaucrats’ extravagant government budgets at taxpayer expense. As I have maintained especially in this article, the involuntary, confiscatory income tax is the biggest enabler of government criminality ever. Removing the involuntary income tax is an “existential threat” to said government “security” apparatchiks.
Other examples of murderous Western government actions that have resulted in catastrophic blowback include President George H.W. Bush’s 1991 starting a whole new war of aggression against Iraq, even though Iraq was not a threat to the U.S.
In 1991 the U.S. military bombed and destroyed Iraqi civilian water and sewage treatment centers and then imposed sanctions on the Iraqis, which prevented the Iraqis from rebuilding, which forced the Iraqi civilian population to have to use untreated water, which led to skyrocketing disease and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocents by the mid-1990s, and then hundreds of thousands more by the year 2000.
The September 11th attacks in 2001 were clearly blowback from the decade of violence, bombings and murders by U.S. military in Iraq and the U.S. government’s other invasions, occupations and support of repressive regimes leading up to that time.
So, my question is, was the George H.W. Bush regime starting a whole new war in the Middle east in 1991 intentionally to cause the blowback of a 9/11 nature? Are bureaucrats that insane?
What do you think is going to happen when you bomb and destroy people’s water supply and sewage treatment centers? (Which the Israelis are doing to Gaza right now, by the way.)
Another example of that insane motive could be that after 9/11, and after the younger President George W. Bush followed in his father’s warmongering footsteps by starting another war of aggression in Iraq as well as a war in Afghanistan, during the mid-2000s the Bush administration helped Iraq and Afghanistan concoct new Constitutions.
Not a Constitution promoting freedom and individual rights, mind you. Nope. The new Iraq Constitution, still in place, declared Iraq to be an Islamic state under repressive Sharia Law. Why would the Bush administration agree to this?
The new Afghanistan Constitution was the same, although since 2021 Afghanistan now has no Constitution and an even more repressive society. Thanks, George W. Bush.
Prior to the 1990s, the U.S. government armed Iraq and helped Saddam Hussein gas Iranians during the 1980s Iran-Iraq War. (If only the rulers had listened to George Washington!)
Even further back, there were the hostilities between the U.S. and Iran. American “conservatives,” foreign interventionists and neocons are still angry at Iran for taking Americans hostage in 1979 at the time of the Iranian Revolution, which itself was blowback for the CIA’s supporting the Shah of Iran’s repressive SAVAK police state and torture, which followed CIA’s 1953 “Operation Ajax” coup in Iran (that was partly in the name of expropriating Iran’s oil for the British).
The U.S.-backed SAVAK police state kept Iranians in fear of their own government, much like what many Americans fear now thanks to the gestapo-like tactics of the Obama/Biden DOJ and FBI in Amerika.
So, did U.S. government bureaucrats, CIA and Pentagon, intend to cause the radicalization of Islam believers in Iran during the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s?
Iranians living in such repressive conditions in society as imposed by the American CIA-supported SAVAK had to have been a major contributor to the radicalizing of Iranians’ Islamic religion, from the 1950s coup leading up to the 1979 Iranian Islamic Revolution.
Since 1979 the Iranian opposition to the repressive Islamic regime, the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MeK), during the earlier years following the 1979 Revolution had been involved in terrorist acts of assassinations and bombings, and was listed as an official terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department.
That is worth noting here, because U.S. government bureaucrats and their hangers-on had been caught giving paid speeches on behalf of the Iranian MeK, while the MeK was on the U.S. government’s list of terrorist organizations.
Meanwhile, other people mainly non-involved Muslims had been imprisoned for the crime of providing “material support for terrorism,” as Glenn Greenwald pointed out in 2012.
But some of the American statist lackeys who were supposedly “providing material support” for the officially designated terrorist organization MeK included, according to Greenwald, “Rudy Giuliani, Howard Dean, Michael Mukasey, Ed Rendell, Andy Card, Lee Hamilton, Tom Ridge, Bill Richardson, Wesley Clark, Michael Hayden, John Bolton, Louis Freeh — and Fran Townsend,” a bunch of neocons, interventionist apparatchiks and “national security” swamp creatures.
And get this. In his subsequent article on the red-faced U.S. government’s 2012 de-listing of the MeK as an official terrorist organization, Greenwald notes,
What makes this effort all the more extraordinary are the reports that MEK has actually intensified its terrorist and other military activities over the last couple of years. In February, NBC News reported, citing US officials, that “deadly attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists are being carried out by [MEK]” as it is “financed, trained and armed by Israel’s secret service”. While the MEK denies involvement, the Iranian government has echoed these US officials in insisting that the group was responsible for those assassinations. NBC also cited “unconfirmed reports in the Israeli press and elsewhere that Israel and the MEK were involved in a Nov. 12 explosion that destroyed the Iranian missile research and development site at Bin Kaneh, 30 miles outside Tehran”.
In April, the New Yorker’s Seymour Hersh reported that the US itself has for years provided extensive training to MEK operatives, on US soil (in other words, the US government provided exactly the “material support” for a designated terror group which the law criminalizes).
In other words, your tax dollars at work, folks.
More info on the U.S. and Iranian MeK here.
And if the October 7th Hamas attack really was an intentional false flag from the blowback of Israel’s “open air imprisonment” of Gazans for 15 years, it could also have been allowed as an excuse for the government to expand even further the police state, the surveillance state cracking down even more on speech and on “disinformation,” and on people who question the government’s official narratives or who criticize the regime. And I mean in the U.S. not just Israel.
Throughout the history of the West, the U.S., Israel, and other governments, false flag acts of violence have been planned and committed in order to blame the violence on others or effect in some desired central planning outcome.
Washington’s Blog, which apparently no longer exists, had this very detailed list (Wayback Machine link) of the many false flag ops admitted to by governments and militaries. For instance,
The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews who were Holocaust survivors attempting to flee to safety in Palestine right after World War II, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the pseudo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings…
Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed)…
The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister…
The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change…
The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s through the 1980s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.
As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security”…[Washington’s Blog further expands on this item with several more links.]
As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings…
A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddafi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist transmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddafi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter…
The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war.
Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction…
Washington’s Blog included many more false flag ops by many countries’ governments on the long list there.
Israeli rulers allegedly seeking to expel the Arabs from their Jewish State is a possible motive for a false flag op. And possible motive by the Western central-planning regimes in keeping Gaza, Iran, Iraq and other Islamic-based cultures “oppressed,” poor, primitive and repressive, and their populations angered and enraged at Western governments’ manipulations and false flag ops, in my view, might be so that the U.S. and the West would continue to dominate economically and culturally, as well as for the greedy parasites in those governments to expropriate the oil and natural resources of those lands.
And to justify the continuation of the greedy Western government bureaucrats’ extravagant tax-funded budgets and high-off-the-hog largess, of course.
via Activist Post
Wednesday, November 22, 2023
Monday, November 20, 2023
The Corrupters
Source: Free Speech magazine, November 2000, Volume VI, Number 11
by Dr. William L. Pierce
May I be cynical for a few minutes? I hope you don’t mind, but with the great democratic ritual of choosing a new President coming up in just a few days now, I can’t resist the urge to make a few cynical comments.
Of course, it’s not just the current Presidential campaign which is the cause for my cynicism. Have you been watching the senatorial campaign in New York? Have you noticed how Mrs. Clinton and the Republican candidate, Rick Lazio, have been falling over one another in their eagerness to apply their lips to the posterior of the Jewish vote?
You certainly have seen what’s been going on in Palestine during the past few weeks. Even on American television, which always censors out the most atrocious behavior of the Jews and tries to present the news in the light most favorable to them, the basic pattern has been clear enough: Palestinians have been throwing rocks at the Jews, and the Jews have been shooting and killing Palestinians. Nearly all of those killed over there have been Palestinians. The Jewish news media over here portray the conflict as “Israelis responding to Palestinian violence,” in the sense of cops responding to robbers, but it’s clear to anyone with eyes and a brain where most of the violence is coming from.
And it’s clear how the violence got started again. The most hated Jewish politician over there, Ariel Sharon, deliberately provoked it. When he was in the Israeli military, Sharon used to send his troops into Palestinian villages and refugee camps to butcher unarmed civilians. That sort of behavior helped win him the votes of the raving-mad Orthodox Jews, who bob their heads up and down while praying at the “Wailing Wall” for their tribal god Yahweh to kill all the Gentiles and turn the world over to them, as he promised them 3,000 years ago.
Sharon is no longer an active-duty Israeli general, but he still knows how to win Jewish votes. He showed up at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem back at the beginning of the month with a huge contingent of armed bodyguards and Jewish secret police thugs, who chased away the Moslems who were praying in the mosque there. He swaggered around a bit, expressed his contempt for Moslems in general and Palestinians in particular, and left, but that was enough to infuriate Palestinians and provoke Palestinian boys into throwing rocks at Jewish soldiers, who responded by shooting them dead. Sharon’s popularity among religious Jews immediately shot up.
During the fighting a Lebanese militia took three Jewish soldiers as prisoners, and the Jewish media over here immediately began talking about “kidnapped” Jews. When armed soldiers are captured by an opposing armed force in a combat situation, the proper term is “prisoners of war,” not “kidnap victims,” but the people who put the spin on our news figured “kidnap victims” would be more likely to get sympathy from Americans. They want us to feel sorry for the Israeli soldiers who are shooting Palestinian children rather than for the children who are being shot.
Well, all of that’s a pretty transparent situation, and, even if it keeps the couch potatoes fooled, certainly both Mr. Lazio and Mrs. Clinton are smart enough to see through it. They understand what’s going on over there in Palestine. They know who the aggressors are; they know who the thieves, the butchers, the torturers, the child killers are. And yet they both grovel for the votes of the Jews over here, who support the activities of the Jews in Palestine. They pretend to believe whatever the Jews tell them. They pretend to be indignant when the United Nations asks the Jews to stop killing Palestinian children. They pretend to believe that the Jews are inoffensive and innocent and are being picked on by wicked Palestinians.
And, really, Rick Lazio and Hillary Clinton are not atypical. The fact that these two are campaigning in New York brings the Jewish issue to the fore in their campaign, of course, but the truth of the matter is that every politician in Washington also would grovel for Jewish votes in the same way. The whole system has become corrupt in its very essence.
Now, I’ll tell you what I was thinking about while watching a recent Lazio-Clinton debate. Of course, I felt a certain sense of shame, of embarrassment. Neither Rick Lazio nor Hillary Clinton is a Jew. They are, unfortunately, a part of our people. We are responsible for them. But – and this is the important point – the Jews are responsible in a very general sort of way, for the fact that people so lacking in character and integrity are political candidates, and that one of them will end up in the U.S. Senate.
We always have had both bad and good men and women among our own people. We always have had crooks and swindlers and con men and liars and traitors. We have had manipulators and fast-buck artists and lawyers and child molesters among our own people. But it wasn’t often that we chose the fast-buck artists and the swindlers to govern us and make our laws. At least, we were less likely to choose such people before we let the Jews take over our news and entertainment media and begin controlling the opinions and attitudes of the lemmings, of the electorate. Before that, not every candidate for public office was a crook.
One other thing for which we ourselves are responsible is having a type of government which is a natural breeding ground for con men and liars. The Jews didn’t do that to us. In fact, all Jews were banned from Britain during the period when the parliamentary form of government developed there, during the 14th, 15th, 16th, and first half of the 17th century. Edward I sent them all packing in 1290, because they were causing too much dissension and were involved in too much mischief in his kingdom, and it was more than 350 years later when Oliver Cromwell, deranged by a Puritan infatuation with the Old Testament, permitted them to start trickling back in. And, of course, the rat’s nest of a system we have in Washington now grew out of the English parliamentary system.
And so we cannot blame the Jews for the fact that we have many fools and many knaves among our own people, and we cannot blame them for the fact that we have a system of government which is so susceptible to corruption: a system in which fools are allowed to vote and knaves are allowed to hold office. So this weakness, this susceptibility to manipulation and corruption, was inherent in us even without the intervention of the Jews. But you know, the Jews have an amazing talent for sniffing out weaknesses in others and then figuring how to turn those weaknesses to their own advantage.
And really, that is what makes the Jews special. That is what has made them more hated than any other race by all the peoples among whom they have dwelled throughout recorded history. Jews aren’t hated just because they think they’re God’s chosen people. There are other tribes which also have delusions of grandeur. The Chinese, for example, believe that they are racially superior to the other Asiatic peoples around them. And perhaps they are, but who cares, except the Chinese?
And the Jews aren’t hated just because they shoot Palestinian children or go on throat-cutting rampages in refugee camps. Other tribes also have murderous reputations: the Turks, for example. And the Jews aren’t hated just because there are even more fast-buck artists among them than among us, or because they have stickier fingers than most. The Gypsies have a similar reputation, and although no one wants to have Gypsies around, they don’t often inspire the intense hatred that Jews do.
Jews are hated, first and foremost, because they are corrupters. They are hated, by those who are aware of what they are doing, because they involve us in their dirty business. They are hated because, instead of doing their own dirty work, like the Chinese or the Turks or the Gypsies, they deceive and manipulate us into doing it for them. They get us to support them in their murder of Palestinian children. They make us pay for it, they make us supply the weapons, and they make our government express approval of it.
The Chinese or the Turks or the Gypsies may endanger our property or our security or our economic well-being, but the Jews endanger our souls. Other aliens exploit us only externally; the Jews, like an especially insidious disease organism, get inside us and change the way we think and behave in order to make us easier prey for them to exploit.
A few days ago someone sent me an excerpt from a Jewish book published in 1988 by Basic Books in New York. The title is Born Guilty: Children of Nazi Families. It was written by a Jew in Germany, Peter Sichrovsky, and it is in effect a survey of the extent to which the compulsory brainwashing program imposed on Germans after the Second World War has been successful. It consists of the transcripts of a series of interviews with young Germans conducted by the Jew. Unfortunately, the brainwashing program has been very successful, and between the lines of the book one can read the author’s gloating over the Jews’ accomplishment in making young Germans hate their parents and grandparents and feel guilty for being German, although in typically Jewish fashion he complains that the Germans don’t feel guilty enough.
It was Jews, of course, who designed the truly satanic, soul-destroying programs of so-called “denazification” and “reeducation” which were imposed on the German people. It has been at Jewish insistence that laws have been enacted in Germany and Austria making it a penal offense to contradict or even question any detail of the Jewish “Holocaust” story or to suggest that the Jews themselves were in any way to blame for their lack of popularity in Germany before the war. Making it illegal to oppose the brainwashing has been a factor in its effectiveness, of course. Locking people up for reading the “wrong” sort of books or listening to the “wrong” sort of music helps to keep other Germans in line. Banning political parties in Germany that fail to follow the Jewish party line helps too. And all of this has made it a little easier, no doubt, to suck the 70 billion or so dollars in reparations the Jews have extracted from the Germans since the war.
But this uniquely Jewish mode of parasitism has robbed the Germans of infinitely more than money. It has corrupted their souls – and deliberately so. In the old days when someone won a war he collected tribute from the conquered nation. He made them pay. But he didn’t meddle with their souls. He didn’t try to corrupt them spiritually. He left them free to be themselves, to feel and think whatever they wanted, so long as they paid the tribute demanded of them. But with the Jews, corrupting the victim is the main thing. And they are uniquely equipped for corruption by having a faculty for deception that is so far above that of any other people that it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree.
In the book I just cited, Born Guilty, the Jewish author Sichrovsky writes:
It is no accident that I, a Jew, someone not burdened by past guilt, should have tackled the question of how these descendants of the perpetrators came to terms with the problem.
The arrogance of that statement – “I, a Jew, someone not burdened by past guilt” – is really breathtaking. Sichrovsky, like most Jews, accepts the idea of collective guilt, of racial guilt passed from one generation to the next: “Your Nazi grandparents persecuted us Jews, so you owe us!” Which is to say, the Jews accept the idea of other races being guilty; they certainly don’t accept the idea of their own guilt. You know, one of the principal reasons the Germans didn’t like Jews and wanted them out of Germany in the 1930s was based on the Jews’ support of communism, on the Jews’ espousal of the doctrine of their fellow Jew, Marx. The Germans knew what the Jews were doing to the Ukrainians and the Russians under communism, and they didn’t want the Jews doing it to them too. They knew that the communists were implementing the Jewish doctrine of egalitarianism – they were equalizing Ukraine and Russia – by murdering wholesale the best Ukrainians and the best Russians. The Germans knew about the mass executions being carried out in Russia by the communists. They knew about the death camps, the slave-labor camps. They knew who were running these death camps. They knew who the commissars were. And believe me, Sichrovsky knows too – and yet he piously writes, “I, a Jew, someone not burdened by past guilt...”
Pious fraud: that is something for which they have a unique talent. The chief actor in the pious fraud racket in the United States is the professional “survivor” Elie Wiesel. Wiesel gets $25,000 plus expenses each time he consents to lay a little collective guilt on a Gentile audience, and he does it fairly often. With a sad – really a mournful – expression on his terribly Jewish face, he spins his fairy tales about how those awful Nazis persecuted and mistreated him and all of the other innocent, inoffensive, sensitive, caring Jews: people not burdened by past guilt. And he never cracks a smile or shows a trace of embarrassment. And the hypnotized idiots in his audience lap it all up. Wiesel is a corrupter of souls. And he is only one of many.
For decades the most influential and revered Orthodox Jew in New York was Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson: the so-called Lubavitcher Rebbe and hereditary leader of the Chabad movement. Every politician in New York, Jew or Gentile, genuflected to the good rabbi. Schneerson died in 1992, but Hillary and Rick and the rest still pay tribute to him, expressing admiration for his wisdom and his piety. As a matter of fact, throughout his career Schneerson preached the hatred of all non-Jews that is inherent in Judaism. Other Orthodox Jews, such as Al Gore’s vice-presidential candidate Joseph Lieberman, are reticent about the more invidious aspects of their religion; in fact, they will simply lie to you about it if you question them. But Rabbi Schneerson wasn’t reticent at all. He spelled it out for his followers in his lectures and his writings. He taught that non-Jews are sub-human, that they are like cattle, created by the Jewish god Yahweh only to serve the Jews. He taught this explicitly, openly, over a period of many years.
I’ll quote directly from one of Rabbi Schneerson’s lectures. This is taken from a book of his lectures published in Israel in 1965. The English title of the book is Gatherings of Conversations:
This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of a member of any other nation of the world ... The Jewish body looks as if it were in substance similar to the bodies of non-Jews, but . . . the bodies only seem to be similar in material substance, outward look, and superficial quality. The difference of the inner quality, however, is so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is an halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews... Their bodies are in vain... An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist. A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul comes from holiness.
And there’s much, much more in the same vein, although reading Rabbi Schneerson’s lectures is not easy. Like the Talmud, they are full of hair-splitting, lawyer-like quibbling and references to obscure authorities. If you spend much time reading the Talmud and ask yourself what kind of people could be governed by such a strange religion, you’ll likely come to the same conclusion both Rabbi Schneerson and I have come to: the Jews and we really are completely different species.
The Jews of the New York Times and all of the other Jews covered for Schneerson, of course. No one ever denounced his teaching or called him a “hater.” Instead, he always was praised as a sort of living saint. And as I said, the Gentile politicians like Hillary Clinton and Rick Lazio, who really know better, still genuflect whenever his name is mentioned. And the Jews play right along. What contempt they must have for us! How easy it is to deceive us!
And how easy it is to bleed us! When a U.S. Navy destroyer, the USS Cole, was attacked in the Red Sea last week and nearly 20 American sailors were killed, not one government official was willing to place the blame where it belonged. Mr. Clinton’s Jewish secretary of defense was on television promising that he would search to the ends of the earth to find and punish the people responsible for the attack.
Hey, Mr. Cohen! You don’t have to search that far to find those responsible for the deaths of our sailors. The Jews have been murdering Palestinian children for the past three weeks, with the support of your government. The Jews have been firing rockets into Palestinian apartment buildings from helicopter gunships supplied to Israel by your Defense Department. Last week 70 U.S. senators signed a resolution of support for this sort of Jewish behavior. That was the Senate of which you used to be a member before you became Secretary of Defense. It was you who sent the USS Cole into harm’s way in order to maintain a blockade of Iraq: a blockade which in no way serves American interests but which is demanded by Jews because Iraq is an enemy of Israel. Mr. Clinton came on television and said that our ship wasn’t on a hostile mission. You certainly understand, Mr. Cohen, even if Mr. Clinton doesn’t, that blockading another country with a warship is a hostile action: it is an act of war. Did you really expect all of the non-Jewish people of the Middle East being victimized by the United States acting on behalf of the Jews to simply sit on their hands forever and let themselves continue to be victimized?
No, you really didn’t expect that, did you, Mr. Cohen? You knew that eventually the victims of your government’s policies would fight back. But you didn’t really care, so long as Jews didn’t get killed. You and your fellow Jews, both in this country and in Israel, are responsible for the attack on the USS Cole, and you know it. But still you go on television and refer to the attack as an act of terrorism and the attackers as cowards. Two brave men stand at attention as they willingly sacrifice their lives in order to strike a blow for their people in the only way they can, and you call them cowards and terrorists!
Ah, Mr. Cohen, you and your fellow Jews really do have contempt for our intelligence, don’t you? One of these days we will make you understand that there are a few of us who aren’t lemmings, a few of us who can see with our own eyes and hear with our own ears and figure things out for ourselves. That will be the day when we begin settling the score with those who have been deceiving and corrupting and bleeding our people for so long.
* * *
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)