Thursday, November 30, 2017
Monday, November 27, 2017
„Anti-Semitism” - Part III
Boston: A Harvard Divinity School professor, John
Strugnell, was removed this week as chief editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls not
only because of his poor health, but because of a tirade against Israel and
Judaism, his colleagues said. The remarks, in which he called Judaism „a
horrible religion“ that „should have disappeared,“ came as a surprise to some
colleagues working with him to decipher the ancient texts of the Old Testament.
Strugnell made the remarks in a recent interview published in Haaretz, a Tel
Aviv news-paper. In the Haaretz interview, Strugnell, 60, said he was not
against Jews but their religion, according to an account soon to be published
in the Biblical Archaeology Review. „I can’t allow the word anti-Semitism to be
used,“ he is quoted as saying, „Anti-Judaist, that’s what I am.“
In other words... what you are about to read are other people’s strong
and often quite inflammatory Reactions... to a Hateful and very destructive
Belief System... The believers of which, intent upon World Dominion and
enslaving the masses, are following a carefully planned and systematic scheme...
seemingly unconcerned about the Reproach and often Violent anger brought down
upon the Whole of their people as a Consequence.
BTW: The ADL will not be able to defend you from
IaHUeH on that soon coming day!... And if you would start reading the TORAH
more instead of your Tragically Twisted Talmudic Traditions.. you would quickly
redifine „anti-semite“ not to mention your whole way of thinking and relating
with your Neighbors!!
POPE CLEMENT VIII: „All the world suffers from the
usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many
unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working
class people and the very poor. Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently
anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine
and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as
well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever
country they happen to live.“
THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees ordered
that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the colony without
authorization „use their endeavors that the said Jews may be removed from the
Colony of Georgia, as the best and only satisfaction that they can give to the
Trustees for such an indignity offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty’s
Charter.“ (C. Jones, HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)
MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923: „The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by
them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are
driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which
is increasing.“
JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by
the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316): „Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track
which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence,
Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and
bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly
prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws
of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.“
PIUS VII. Known generally as an ‘anti-Semite’ by
Jewish writers.
„A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of
great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they
inflict.“ (Letter of November 11, 1933)
„Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the Jews
by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of them in my
kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the most vile nation in
the world.“ (Letter to his brother Jerome, King of
Westphalia, March 6, 1808)
COMMUNITY OF STRASBOURG, FRANCE. In an address to the ASSEMBLEE in 1790,
the city’s revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews, because: „Everyone
knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one doubted they were
foreigners... Let the ‘enlighteners’ stop defaming the Gentiles by blaming them
for what is wrong with the Jews. Their conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the
Jews might eventually give up every aspect of their separation and all the
characteristics of their nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we
might them judge them to be worthy of equality. (Tres Humble Adresse qui Presente la
Commune de la Ville Strasbourg)
H. H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 -
November 1, 1937: „In 1848 the word „anti-Semitic“
was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word „Jew.“ The right word
for them is „Jew“...
„I implore all of you to be accurate - call them Jews.
There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in
this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years
ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. No he has got
you absolutely by the throat - that is your reward.“
CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate: „The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. They
monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the spiritual
treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a national and patriotic
duty - not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to get rid of the plague would
indicate that we are lazy cowards who let ourselves be carried alive to our
graves. Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Romanian and
Christian blood? It is logical and holy to react against them.“ (New York Herald Tribune, August 17, 1937)
Friday, November 24, 2017
Dr. David Duke on Harvey Weinstein & Race Realism
Topics David
Duke lectures about: The rapes by Hollywood Jewish mogul Harvey Weinstein are
critical in exposing Jewish domination of America.
What the Jewish press in Israel
writes for themselves is very different than what the Jewish owned press writes
for the gentiles.
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Monday, November 20, 2017
Behind Liberalism
by Dr. William Luther
Pierce
When anyone
wants to eliminate a problem or overcome an obstacle, it’s usually a big help
to him to understand the nature of the problem or the obstacle. If he
misunderstands the nature of the problem and bases his attempt to eliminate it
on that misunderstanding, he’s far more likely to fail than if he tackles the
problem with a thorough understanding of its nature. That’s self- evident, and
probably my worst enemies would agree with me on that. And yet there are some
very important problems that are frustrating us in our efforts to solve them
simply because most of us have made no serious effort to understand their true
nature. We have just assumed that the nature of the problems is self-evident
when in fact it is not.
The most important example of this
is the assumption that the reason our civilization is self- destructing is
so-called „liberal“ social and political policies. There is a general belief
that we have a preponderance of liberals in our government, in the media, among
school administrators, among Christian preachers, and so on, and that most of
the White public goes along with the destructive policies of these leading
liberals because most members of the public also are liberals.
And I’m using the word „liberal“ to
designate a person who has a particular set of beliefs, much in the way a
Christian has a particular set of beliefs. That is, a Christian believes, among
other things, that a man named Jesus of Nazareth, born approximately 2,000 years
ago in Palestine, was the son of God; that he walked on water, resurrected the
dead, and performed other miracles; and that after he was crucified at the
demand of the Jews he rose from the dead and ascended into heaven. And a
liberal believes, among other things, that all featherless bipeds are „equal“ -
that is, that they all are born with the same potential and would be equal in
their accomplishments if they all had the same advantages and opportunities.
And as I said, there is a very
common assumption made that the ongoing destruction of our society and our
civilization is the consequence of applying the fallacious belief system of the
liberals to the formulation of public policy. But this very common assumption
is incorrect - or perhaps it would be better to say that it misses the point.
Liberal policies certainly are destructive, but they aren’t the ultimate
driving force behind the assault on Western civilization and our race. And so
any attempt to restore our society to health and save our civilization from
ruin based on an effort to change the beliefs of liberals - to convince
liberals of the incorrectness of their ideas - is likely to fail. It is likely
to fail because the problem is only superficially, but not fundamentally, the
consequence of a group of people - namely, liberals - basing their policies on
a particular set of incorrect ideas, such as the innate equality of all
featherless bipeds. The problem is not one of belief, but one of psychology, of
human nature, and of the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by
hidden agents.
I am sure that there are real
liberals: that is, people who have thought about the world around them and then
consciously adopted the liberal ideology. They constitute a fraction of a
percent of the people who adhere to liberal policies and pay lip service to
liberal ideas. The rest - that is, nearly all so-called „liberals“ - are
liberals for the same reason that Catholics are Catholics and Lutherans are
Lutherans and Buddhists are Buddhists. It has nothing to do with the ideologies
of the various religions and everything to do with psychology. With a few rare
exceptions, a Catholic is not a Catholic because he has thought about the world
around him and decided that Catholicism is what makes the most sense. He is a
Catholic because his parents and his neighbors are Catholics. He is a Catholic -
or a Lutheran or a Buddhist - because he is a lemming, and lemmings don’t make
up their own minds about anything. They believe - really believe - whatever
they think the people around them believe.
With liberals today it’s not so much
a matter of believing what one’s parents or neighbors believe as it is
believing what one perceives to be fashionable in one’s peer group, and the
perception most often comes from one’s television screen. It is possible to
persuade an occasional liberal that his view of the world is incorrect and his
policies are destructive and he should straighten out his thinking, just as it
is possible to persuade an occasional Lutheran that Martin Luther really was
the Antichrist and that Lutherans should beg the Pope for forgiveness and
return to Holy Mother Church. It’s a hard sell in either case. And as I said,
it misses the point.
The point is this: Liberals are
tools. Most of them are not inherently evil or destructive, any more than a
hammer used to smash a statue by Phidias is evil or a match used to burn a
great library is evil. Liberals are morally neutral, like the hammer and the
match. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for
destructive purposes. The evil is in the mind that plans the destruction and
then uses the liberals to carry it out. And that force is the force that
controls our mass media of news and entertainment. That mind is the mind that
formulates the slant of the news and the content of the media entertainment;
the mind that determines which news will be reported and how it will be
reported, and which news will be suppressed; the mind that determines which
trends will be made fashionable and which ideas will be deemed Politically
Correct.
And it is that force, that mind,
that malevolent spirit that we must counter: that we must be aware of in making
our plan to restore our society to health and halt the ruin of our
civilization. When I said a moment ago that our problem is not one of belief
but one of psychology, of human nature, I meant that we should not focus our
efforts on trying to change the beliefs of the liberals but rather on exposing
and then destroying the malevolent entity that manipulates the liberals by
exploiting their psychological compulsion to conform to perceived norms.
That’s a fact, but as I said at the
beginning, most people who are interested in eliminating the problem fail to
see it that way. They still want to fight the liberals rather than the hidden
force behind the liberals. What I’ll do now is try to persuade you that my
understanding of the nature of the problem is correct by providing a few
examples or illustrations of the way in which the problem manifests itself.
We might note first the global
nature of the problem, the global way in which it is being orchestrated. Almost
everywhere one looks in the White world, one sees the same destructive forces
at work, the same governmental policies, the same wrongheaded attitudes and
fashions being promoted by the media. There are, of course, local differences
of detail. The United States had a large population of Black slaves until 136
years ago, and no country in Europe has that sort of history. One would expect
this difference to have a strong effect on racial attitudes and policies, but
in fact the policies of governments throughout Europe and the party line
promoted by the mass media of news and entertainment throughout Europe are in
broad outline the same as those in the United States.
The denial of racial differences and
the doctrinaire promotion of egalitarianism are as much policies of the mass
media and the government in Germany, in France, and in the United Kingdom, for
example, as in the United States. Most European countries have no common border
with a non-White country, as the United States does, and yet one sees the same
insanely destructive policy regarding non-White immigration nearly everywhere
in Europe that one sees in the United States. Nowhere is non-White immigration
popular, and yet every government pursues a policy of bringing non-White
immigrants into the country and then favoring and protecting them after they
are in. One sees the same sort of corruption of the society by Turks, by Arabs,
by Blacks, by Pakistanis, by Vietnamese, by Chinese, or by other non-Whites in
the big cities of Sweden or Denmark or England as in the United States. The
majority of the Whites everywhere are against it, while their supposedly
democratic governments and the media are for it.
A good example of this is what’s
been happening in northern England recently, where Asian gangs have been
attacking and terrorizing Whites, and the government and the media have been
trying to blame it on „White racists,“ such as members of the British National
Party, the BNP. In fact the dynamics of the current racial rioting in the
Manchester, England, area and in nearby Leeds is remarkably similar to the
racial conflicts we’ve seen in places like Seattle and Cincinnati recently in
this country. In Seattle and Cincinnati, Blacks were attacking Whites -
specifically targeting Whites, especially young, White women, for vicious
beatings fueled by racial hatred - while the media tried hard to persuade the
public that race had nothing to do with the attacks, and the politicians were
making promises of more handouts to the Blacks and looking for Whites to arrest
in connection with the rioting so that they could not be accused of „racial
profiling“ because they arrested more Blacks than Whites. In the Manchester
suburb of Oldham, with a population of nearly a quarter of a million-15 percent
of which consists of Asian immigrants brought in by the British government
against the will of the British people since the Second World War-gangs of
Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, and Indians have been attacking Whites, while the
media and the politicians have been trying to blame it on Whites, who
supposedly provoked the Asians. Change the names of the cities, and the news
stories in England about the Oldham race war or the race riot just three days
ago in Leeds could have been written in this country about the riots in Seattle
and Cincinnati.
I’ll read to you excerpts from a
couple of news reports that came from Oldham during the last two weeks. An
Associated Press International story from Sunday, May 27, reported:
At the height of the clashes - which
continued off and on for seven hours, into the early hours of Sunday - up to
500 youths fought pitched battles with police in full riot gear. The fighting
left the main thoroughfare in the town’s Glodwick district littered with broken
bricks, shards of glass, and the hulks of several burned-out cars.
Paul Barrow, proprietor of a pub
that was trashed in the fighting, said rioters burst in and began beating his
patrons. „The first of them got through the door and attacked the customers
with whatever they could get their hands on - bottles, stools, and glasses,“ he
said.
Did you hear anything about that? I’m
sure that you would have heard plenty and would still be hearing about it if
500 Whites had been the ones rioting and beating up Asians. And do you know how
the rioting started? The same Associated Press International story says:
The riot apparently was sparked when
a gang of white youths attacked a home in a neighborhood where most residents
are of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or Indian origin, police said. Soon after, a
group of about 100 youths from the neighborhood attacked a pub mainly
patronized by whites.
Actually, gangs of Asians have been
attacking Whites in Oldham for months. Most of these attacks have been ignored
by the media, although an especially vicious incident earlier this year did
make national headlines. In that incident Asians nearly killed a 76-year-old
White man, Walter Chamberlain, when they smashed his face with bricks while
screaming anti-White insults at him.
I’ll read you another news report,
this one from the May 30 issue of London’s The Times:
White families barricaded the
windows of their homes with planks of wood last night as residents in the
Oldham riot zone retreated behind ethnic lines....
Earlier Jack Straw, the home
secretary, tried to blame racial conflict in the town on intervention by the
British National Party, but angry local white people told a different story.
After Chief Superintendent Eric Hewitt said on television that all but a few of
the 20 people arrested overnight were white, The Times sought the views of the
town’s shrinking white community.
People described themselves as being
under siege. Neighbors told of sending children to stay with families in
Manchester and Ashton-under-Lyne so that they were not injured by bricks flying
through windows or kept awake at night by police helicopters....
Mr. Straw told the Oldham Evening
Chronicle yesterday: „It is plain beyond doubt that relations between different
sections of the community can only be poisoned by the intervention of
extremists like the BNP. I utterly deplore their attempts to exploit the
situation in the town.“
Straw’s comments about the BNP are
nearly identical to those of the local media and government people in York,
Pennsylvania, about me and the National Alliance when some of our material was
distributed in York recently. I told you about that in my broadcast two weeks
ago. If one isn’t aware of the underlying forces involved, that sort of global
unanimity might be surprising.
By the way, Jack Straw, the United
Kingdom’s minister of home affairs, who among other things is in charge of the
country’s police agencies, is a Jew. So was his predecessor as home secretary,
Michael Howard. I have no idea how he managed to appropriate a good English
name like „Howard,“ but while he was in office Howard banned me from the United
Kingdom. He told me that if I ever attempted to enter that country again I
would be arrested. The reason for my banning, he said, is that I might cause a
breach of the public order. I told him that I had never in my life caused a
breach of the public order anywhere. But the banning still stands. A Jew is
able to tell me that I cannot visit the land of my ancestors, and his order is
enforced by English policemen!
What do you think is the likelihood
that the present Jewish home secretary, Jack Straw, will ban any of the
Pakistanis or other Asians who smashed in Walter Chamberlain’s head with
bricks? Well of course, you know that there’s no chance at all of that because
the same unwritten rules apply in Britain that apply here. An attack on a White
by a non-White is not regarded as a breach of the public order. It’s only when
a White defends himself against non-Whites that the media begin yapping about „hate
crimes,“ and the government politicians spring into action.
And it’s not just Britain and the
United States. The same controlling force is at work in Germany, in
Scandinavia, in France, in Canada, in Australia, and everywhere else in the White
world. From Switzerland to Sweden it is against the law to question the Jews’
claims about how many of them died during the Second World War in the so-called
„Holocaust“ or how they died. In Switzerland people are in prison now for
saying, „I’m not convinced that six million Jews were killed in gas chambers by
the Germans. I think that fewer than six million Jews died during the war, and
most of them died from disease in the concentration camps, rather than from
poison gas.“ Say that over here, and the media will denounce you hysterically
as a „Holocaust denier.“ Say it in Canada or Australia or Switzerland or almost
any other country in Europe, and the government will lock you up.
It is not just an amazing
coincidence that we have this global similarity in conditions at this instant
in time. What we can see is the same organized campaigns, the same well-oiled
legislative and social programs, the same hidden forces behind these campaigns in
every country. As I said, there are differences in detail, but the same evil
minds, the same schemers are at work globally. Take any program, any campaign -
the current campaign by Jewish groups to have more „speech crime“ legislation
enacted in the United States, for example - and if you want to see where it is
headed, look at any other White country where the same program has met a little
less resistance and been able to gain more ground. Where the campaign has gone
in one country is where it is headed in every country, because the same
malevolent force is behind it.
I’ll give you another indication
that it’s not soft, weepy liberal sentiment that’s wrecking our society today,
but rather a cold, hard, cunning, evil force behind the liberalism, using the
liberalism to push a hidden agenda. It’s not some soggy, mushy idea that
everything that somehow qualifies as „human“ is equal that is the driving force
behind the ruin of our civilization, but rather it is a strongly cohesive group
of people that consider themselves superior to everyone not in their ethnic/racial/religious
group and only use egalitarianism as a wrecking tool against our society. My
organization, the National Alliance, has for several years been publishing
information on the racial differences in the incidence of HIV infection in the
United States. One of our leaflets, which we have distributed widely on
university campuses, points out that heterosexual Black males are 14 times as
likely as heterosexual White males to be carriers of the AIDS-causing virus. We’ve
also pointed out that while AIDS among Whites is largely a disease of
homosexuals, among Blacks it’s largely a heterosexual disease. Well, when we
point out this startling difference between Black and White HIV infection rates
for heterosexual males, with Blacks 14 times as likely to be infected, liberals
don’t want to believe it. They don’t want to believe it because it is contrary
to their primary belief in equality, in the essential sameness of Blacks and
Whites.
But of course, the people behind the
scenes - the schemers - are concerned with facts, with reality, not with nutty
notions of equality. The sophomore college girls can squeal in disbelief when
we present our information about racial disparities in the spread of AIDS and
can denounce us as „haters,“ but the AIDS professionals, the experts,
understand the truth of the matter. I have in front of me, on my desk at this
moment, a poster - a large, colorful poster - published by the Florida Department
of Health, intended for distribution in Black neighborhoods. It says, in large
black and red letters „1 in 50 Blacks in Florida has HIV.“ And it gives an 800
number for Blacks to call for free HIV testing.
So why aren’t the White college
girls in Florida told that two percent of Blacks are HIV infected? The government
is telling the Blacks this but hoping that Whites won’t find out. Why is that? Could
it be that the people behind the scenes don’t want White college girls to be
wary of having sex with Blacks? Could it be that they want White college girls
to become infected with HIV?
I believe that’s exactly what they
want. I believe that the people behind the scenes want the destruction of our
people by any means, including racial mixing with Blacks. That’s why the
experts, the people who know the facts about AIDS, are afraid to speak up and
tell the college girls that the National Alliance is correct. They are afraid
of bucking the Jews behind the scenes. I have seen this fear manifested over
and over again, and it is another evidence of the powerful forces that simply
use liberalism as a destructive tool against our people.
Friday, November 17, 2017
Lectures on the Holocaust
Controversial Issues Cross-Examined
Source: https://shop.codoh.com/book/446
Third, revised and expanded edition
of 2017. Did you
know that the mass media were reporting an impending holocaust of six million
Jews since the late eighteen-hundreds? Did you know that the media have
repeatedly exposed the stories of Holocaust survivors to be lies? Did you know
that many mainstream scholars have expressed doubts about the accuracy of
Holocaust history books? Did you know that historians critically investigating
the Holocaust narrative are thrown into jail in most European countries, and
are not allowed to defend themselves in court?
The present book addresses these and
many more such issues. In the first section, it starts by defining what “the
Holocaust” is and why it is an important topic. It then gives examples
demonstrating that it is well to keep an open, critical mind. The second
section tells the tale of many a mainstream scholar expressing doubts and
subsequently falling from grace due to this “heresy.” The third section
discusses in detail the physical traces and documents about the various claimed
crime scenes, such as the camps at Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor. It
investigates the claimed murder weapons: gas chambers, gas vans, crematoria and
cremation pits. The fourth section thoroughly examines to what degree we can
rely on witness testimony, and it analyzes the pertinent aspects of the most
prominent among them. In the last section, the author lobbies for free inquiry
and a free exchange of ideas about this topic, exactly because the powers that
be can’t face critical questions.
Of all the thousands of books on
this topic, this one gives the most-comprehensive and up-to-date overview of
the critical research into the Holocaust. With its dialog style, it is pleasant
to read, and with its logical organization and index, it can even be used as an
encyclopedic compendium.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)