The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Thursday, August 30, 2018
Monday, August 27, 2018
Philosophy - Part I
Part I
„The Gnostics derived their leading
doctrines and ideas from Plato and Philo, the Zend-avesta, the Kabbalah, and
the Sacred books of India and Egypt; and thus introduced into the bosom of
Christianity the cosmological and theosophical speculations, which had formed
the larger portion of the ancient religions of the Orient, joined to those of
the Egyptian, Greek, and Jewish doctrines, which the Neo-Platonists had equally
adopted in the Occident..It is admitted that the cradle of Gnosticism is
probably to be looked for in Syria and even in Palestine. Most of its
expounders wrote in that corrupted form of the Greek used by the Hellenistic
Jews...and there was a striking analogy between their doctrines and those of
the Judeo-Egyptian Philo of Alexandria; itself the seat of three schools, at
once philosophic and religious, the Greek, the Egyptian, and the Jewish.
Pythagoras and Plato, the most mystical of the Grecian philosophers (the latter
heir to the doctrines of the former), and who had travelled, the latter in
Egypt, and the former in Phoenicia, India, and Persia, also taught the esoteric
doctrine...The dominant doctrines of Plutonism were found in Gnosticism...
The Jewish-Greek School of
Alexandria is known only by two of its chiefs, Aristobulus and Philo, both Jews
of Alexandria in Egypt. Belonging to Asia by its origin, to Egypt by its
residence, to Greece by its language and studies, it strove to show that all
truths embedded in the philosophies of other countries were transplanted
thither from Palestine. Aristobulus declared that all the facts and details of
the Jewish Scriptures were so many allegories concealing the most profound
meanings, and that Plato had borrowed from them all his finest ideas.
Philo, who lived a century
after him, following the same theory, endeavored to show that the Hebrew
writings, by their system of allegories, were the true source of all religions
and philosophical doctrines. According to him, the literal meaning was for the
vulgar alone...The Jews of Syria and Judea were the direct precursors of
Gnosticism; and in their doctrines were ample Oriental elements.
These Jews had had with the
Orient, at two different periods, intimate relations, familiarizing them with
the doctrines of Asia and especially of Chaldea and Persia...Living nearly
two-thirds of a century, and many of them long afterward, in Mesopotamia, the
cradle of their race; speaking the same language, and their children reared
with those of the Chaldeans. Assyrians, Medes, and Persians, they necessarily
adopted many of the doctrines of their conquerors...and these additions to the
old doctrine were soon spread by the constant intercourse of commerce into
Syria and Palestine...
From Egypt or Persia the new
Platonists borrowed the idea, and the Gnostics received it from them, that man,
in his terrestrial career, is successively under the influence of the Moon, Mercury,
Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, until he finally reaches the Elysian
Fields.“ (Morals and Dogmas, Albert
Pike)
„The same basis of a State:
opposing interests balanced by combating each other, is wanting. In its place
passions animating popular masses, passions deprived of the corrective of the
consideration of realities, passions let loose at the will of mere psychic
factors...these factors which agitate the masses muting their material power of
reason, which those who take no account of imponderables will find mysterious.
Like a compass needle, influenced by a magnetic storm, imperceptible to our
senses, becomes erratic, sending astray the vessel which trusts to its
indications, losing it in the mysterious ways of the ocean...
In a general way, almost
everywhere, the Jews are Republicans. The Republic tending towards levelling
has always been one of their most cherished aspirations. Not the Republic which
affirms and consolidates the privileges of the possessors, but a
Republic...whose theoretic mission is to make most social inequalities
disappear. For them the Republic is not crystallized in a constitutional formula:
it is a constant progress, a slow but sure march towards the meeting of the
heights and abysses, unification, individual, social, and political
equalization...
Finally, a phenomenon of
contradiction attests to the existence of the Jewish concept of unity: it is
that of anti-Semitism...An anti...ism shows the reality of the thing, the
system. We do not mean that vulgar anti- Semitism, fermentation of hate and
calumnies, composed of errors and absurdities, factor of injustice and
crimes...We speak of that anti-Semitism which is untroubled by passion, a
particular form of judgment, claiming logic, reasoned and rational. Such an
anti-Semitism has its own contention, its intrinsic value, its force of ideas
and action. Qualified representative, champion of a determined order of
thought, of sentiments, beliefs, and results, it has, thanks to the powerful
extension of Christianity...established a mode of civilization almost
universal. If it is opposed to the Jewish concept of unity in almost all
domains, if it rises up against it on almost every ground, it does not ignore
it, it does not deny it: it affirms by contrast the substance, the consistence,
and constance of this concept.“ (Nomades, Kadmi Cohen).
„The Rose-Croix grade is a complete perversion of Christian symbolism
and sacred beliefs; ‘Three major events should fix the attention of the
Rose-Croix: the creation of the world (generation), the deluge of Noah
(destruction), and the redemption of mankind (regeneration). The triple
consideration should be, in fact, ever present in the mind of all Freemasons,
since the royal art has, like the ancient mysteries, no other aim than the
knowledge of nature, where all are born, die, and regenerate themselves...This
regeneration of man was and will always be the work of the philosophy practiced
in the mysteries...the eagle is liberty, the Rose-Croix, humanity, symbolized
by the pelican...The rose was also the emblem of the woman, and as the cross or
triple phallus symbolized virility or the sun in all its force, the combination
of these two emblems offers one more meaning expressing, as the Indian lingam,
the union of the two sexes, symbol of universal generation...Fire (or vital
energy) is concealed everywhere, it embraces all nature, it produces, it
renews, it divides, it consumes, it maintains the whole body...heat and light
are but its modifications, fecundity, movement, and life the effects (of the
letters I.N.R.I., he says). Their combination formed a mysterious meaning long
before Christianity and the sages of antiquity had attached to it one of the
greatest secrets of nature; that of universal regeneration ...All ancient
mystagogies were terminated by all breaking bread and tasting the wine from a
common cup, to recall among themselves the community of goods and that
initiates have nothing of their own. The bread and wine are consecrated. This
mystic nourishment, which should feed body and soul, was an emblem of
immortality.“ (Jewish writer Ragon (Dragon), Cours
philosophique (1841), The Trail of the Serpent, Miss Stoddard, pp. 83-84).
„Much of the old love for
Isis, and especially for Cybele, the Great Mother of the Gods, was taken over
into the church and translated into the worship of Mary, the Mother of
Christ...Similarly the worship of the old deities was made a part of
Christianity. The pagan gods and goddesses were discreetly made over into
Christian saints, as is instanced by the case of St. Bridget.
Their ‘relics’ were sold far
and wide in Christendom as fetishes guaranteed to ward off evil; and their
ancient festive days were made part of the Christian calendar. The Roman
Parilia in April became the Festival of St. George, and the pagan midsummer
orgy in June was converted into the Festival of St. John; the holy day of Diana
in August became the Festival of the Assumption of the Virgin; and the Celtic
feast of the dead in November was changed into the Festival of All Souls
(Halloween). The twenty-fifth day of December, the winter solstice according to
ancient reckoning, celebrated the birthday of the sun-god of Mithraism, was
accepted as the birthday of Christ, and the spring rites in connection with the
death and re-birth of the mystery gods were converted into the Easter rites of
the Crucifixion and Resurrection.“ (This Believing World, Rabbi Lewis Browne, pp. 294- 295).
„Much of the old love for Isis, and especially for Cybele, the Great
Mother of the Gods, was taken over into the church and translated into the
worship of Mary, the Mother of Christ... Similarly the worship of the old local
deities was made a part of Christianity. The pagan gods and goddesses were
discreetly made over into Christian saints, as is instanced by the case of St.
Bridget. (Here Browne reproduces a sketch of St. Bridget which resembles an
obscene cartoon far more than a Saint of the Church). Their ‘relics’ were sold
far and wide in Christendom as fetishes guaranteed to ward off evil; and their
ancient festive days were made part of the Christian calendar. The Roman
Parilia in April became the Festival of St. George, and the pagan midsummer
orgy in June was converted into the Festival of St. John; the holy day of Diana
in August became the Festival of the Assumption of The Virgin; and the Celtic
feast of the dead in November was changed into the Fast of All Souls. The
twenty-fifth day of December, the winter solstice according to ancient
reckoning, celebrated the birthday of the sun-god of Mithraism, was accepted as
the birthday of Christ, and the spring rites in connection with the death and
re-birth of the mystery gods were converted into the Easter rites of the
Crucifixion and Resurrection.“ (This Believing World, by Rabbi
Browne, pp. 294-295)
„The Bolshevists have therefore a philosophy. Let us ask from whence
they got it? To be frank, they have drawn this philosophy from L’Encyclopédie,
which was a vast enterprise of atheism and which, politically speaking,
expressed itself in a precise way at the end of the eighteenth century by the
French Revolution. They are attached to a philosophy which we find at the root
of all socialist systems propagated during the nineteenth century, and
particularly at the root of the Marx system. Thus its early source: L’Encyclopédie;
later source and very diverse: the series of contemporaneous socialist
systems...Such are the deep origins of Leninism and of the Soviet revolution.“ (La
République, Pierre Dominique)
„So also here, when the Male is joined to the Female, they both
constitute one complete body, and all the universe is in a state of happiness
because all things receive blessing from their perfect body. And this is an
arcanum.“ (The Visionary on the Mountain Top).
„I think the secret of it is
found in the ‘imperium in imperio’ matter in the common program towards which
each ‘imperium in imperio’ moves, and has been moving for forty centuries.“ (The Visionary on the Mountain Top).
„A nervous excitability, a chronic exaltation of the passion, in which
commingle the inferior life of the individual and its exterior manifestations,
a state in which sentiment, idea, and will are confounded together, where for
the lack of the powerful corrective of logic, the flights of imagination know
no bounds, where life and human activity are deprived of a regulator, and move
outside of material and concrete factors, by the sole interior force of the
soul.“ (Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, (1929)).
„All idealistic considerations
lead in the end to a kind of conception of divinity, and are, therefore, pure
nonsense in the eyes of Marxists; even Hegel saw in God the concrete form of
everything good and reasonable that rules the world: the idealist theory must
put everything on the shoulders of this unfortunate graybeard, who, according
to the teaching of his worshippers, is perfect, and who, in addition to Adam,
created fleas and harlots, murderers and lepers, hunger and misery, plague and
vodka, in order to punish the very sinners whom he himself had created, and who
sin in accordance with his will, in order that this comedy may be played to all
eternity before the eyes of the wondering world. >From the scientific
standpoint, this theory heads to absurdity. The only scientific explanation of
all the phenomena of the world, is supplied by materialism...
When men eat, carry on the
class war, pull on their boots, pick flowers, write books or marry, it occurs
to nobody to doubt the existence of the external world, and therefore the
existence of the food which they consume, the boots they pull on, or the women
they marry.
This imbecility, however,
follows from the principles of idealism. If the spirit is the basis of
everything, how was it before any men existed? Either we must assume the
existence of a superhuman and divine spirit, such as is described in the old
Hebrew fairy tales of the Bible, or we must say that the distant past is also
merely a creation of our imagination. The first way leads to the so-called
objective idealism, which recognizes the existence of an external world
independent of our consciousness, but nevertheless sees the nature of this
world in a spiritual principle, in a God, a high reason, a world-will, or some
similar spook, which, in this case, takes the place of God. The second way
leads direct to solipsism, through subjective idealism, for which there are
only spiritual feelings individual thinking subjects. It is easy to see the
solipsism is the most consistent form of idealism. Idealism takes the spiritual
principle as original and fundamental, because it believes that only our
perceptions are given to us directly. But if that is so, then the existence of
a block of wood is as doubtful as the existence of any man, even that of our
own parents. Here solipsism destroys itself and at the same time kills the
whole of idealism in philosophy, since when consistently thought out to the
end, it leads to complete absurdity and absolute nonsense, which at every turn
contradicts all human experience.“ (Bukharin, Quoted by Rene Fueloep Miller, The Mind and Face of
Bolshevism, pp. 53-54).
„...is so important that it is not possible to pass it over in silence.
Is it not sufficient to recall the names of the great revolutionaries of the
nineteenth century and twentieth, the Karl Marxes, Lassalles, Kurt Eiseners,
Bella Kuhns, Trotsky, and Léon Blumes, in order to find thus mentioned the
names of all theorists of modern socialism?...Further, in Europe in the same
years, the rìle played by the Jews in all revolutionary movements was considerable...’Revolutionarism’
exacts, at least technically, a very strong dose of passionalism together with
the ‘esprit de masse’ of the crowd. The different individuals, in principle
autonomous, blend even to disappearing in the whole, and the ‘magma’ thus
created takes on an aspect entirely different from the individual figures,
however characteristic each may be, of which it was primarily composed.“ (Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, (1929)).
Friday, August 24, 2018
David Duke Responds to Spike Lee's BlacKkKlansman
The movie by
Spike Lee, BlacKkKlansman, which features David Duke as one of its characters,
is now out in theaters. David Duke himself comes to discuss the veracity of the
story presented in the movie.
Wednesday, August 22, 2018
Monday, August 20, 2018
The Evil Among Us
Source: American Dissident Voices broadcast, July 2000
by Dr. William L. Pierce
Today I
have some new information I want to share with you. It is information on a
subject I’ve discussed with you more than once in the past: namely, the Jewish
trade in White female slaves. The reason this new information is noteworthy is
that it comes directly from the horse’s mouth, so to speak. It is from the June
16 issue of the Jerusalem Post – actually, the Saturday supplement to
the Jerusalem Post. In Israel, of course, they have Saturday
supplements instead of Sunday supplements. The Jerusalem Post‘s
documentary article on Israel’s trade in White slaves, published just two weeks
ago, is astoundingly frank and straightforward, and in today’s broadcast I will
read to you directly from the article.
You know, one of the biggest
problems facing me or anyone else trying to inform the public in a way which
contradicts the party line propagated by the television networks is
credibility. I tell the average citizen something like, “In Israel it is legal
to buy and sell slaves, as long as they aren’t Jews. The slave trade is big
business in Israel, and it’s legal.” The average citizen’s response to this
statement is: “I don’t believe it. That can’t be true. Everyone knows that Jews
are liberals and are big supporters of human rights. They would never tolerate
such a thing as the buying and selling of human beings in their own country.
Don’t you ever watch television? If you did, you’d know that Jews just aren’t
like that.” That reminds me of the refrain from a hymn I used to sing in Sunday
school when I was a child. It went something like: “This I know, for the Bible
tells me so.” Today, of course, television has replaced the Bible as the source
of all truth for the great mass of people – certainly for everyone who is
incapable of looking at the world around him and reaching his own conclusions
based on the evidence.
Actually, I believe that no amount
of evidence will change the mind of a true believer in the TV religion, any
more than it will change the mind of a Bible-believer. Get yourself a copy of
the Jerusalem Post – and it’s available in the New York Public Library
and in a number of other larger libraries around the country – and show it to a
true believer, and he’ll still tell you that he doesn’t believe it. He’ll tell
you it’s a forgery. It can’t be true, because it doesn’t agree with what he’s
seen and heard from television. Anyway, here goes. I quote from the June 16
issue of the Jerusalem Post:
“Every year hundreds of women, and
an unknown number of girls under the age of 18, are bought, sold, drugged,
imprisoned, and forced to work as prostitutes in Israel’s thriving sex
industry. In countries such as Russia, Ukraine, Latvia, and Hungary,
traffickers prey on desperate women. Facing poverty, the women are lured to
Israel with the promise that they will make fabulous salaries working as
teachers or caregivers.”
Here, I will interject two comments
of my own. First, the reason that so many young women in eastern Europe are
facing poverty and are desperate is that the countries in which they live were
bled dry by half a century of Jewish communism. In the case of Russia and
Ukraine, of course, it was nearly three-quarters of a century. In the case of
Hungary and Latvia it was the United States government which turned these
formerly free countries over to the communists at the end of the Second World
War to do with as they pleased.
Do you remember what started the
Second World War? Initially it was just a territorial dispute between Germany
and Poland. The Germans wanted back the German territory which had been taken away
from Germany and given to Poland at the end of the First World War. But when
the Germans, under Hitler, began taking back that territory, in September 1939,
Britain and France declared war on Germany, ostensibly to protect the freedom
of Poland. The Germans had done nothing against Britain and France and wanted
very much to remain at peace with those countries, but the politicians of
Britain and France had other considerations.
The fact that the Soviet Union also
invaded Poland in September 1939 was all right with Britain and France. They
didn’t declare war on the Soviet Union, because the Soviet Union was for all
practical purposes under Jewish rule. They did declare war on Germany, because
Germany, under Hitler, had broken loose from the grip of the Jews, had freed
the German media and German education and German finance and German politics
and German culture from Jewish influence, and was in the process of kicking all
of the Jews out of Germany. That was the reason for the Second World War, not
Polish freedom or Polish territorial integrity. That was the reason why, when
in April 1943 the German Army discovered the mass graves of some of the 25,000
Polish officers and intellectuals murdered by Jewish communists and invited the
International Red Cross and journalists from many nations to view the evidence,
the controlled media in Britain and the United States ignored the evidence and
blamed the atrocity on the Germans. That was the reason why, at the end of the
war, those countries which had gone to war ostensibly to insure the freedom of
Poland agreed to turn Poland and Latvia and Hungary and the rest of eastern
Europe over to the communist butchers who had carried out the massacre of the
elite of the Polish nation.
Of course, the communists economically
drained and ruined all of these countries. And these communists were Jews.
Which is to say, the Jews were the prime movers in the communist regimes
imposed on these countries after the war and also were the primary
beneficiaries of the regimes. In Hungary, for example, there was the regime of
the communist Jew Matyas Rakosi, followed by another communist Jew, Ernö Gerö;
in Romania the communist Jewess Ana Pauker ruled the country as First Secretary
of the Central Committee; in Poland the Minister for State Control was the
communist Jew Roman Zumbrowski; in Czechoslovakia the Secretary General of the
Communist Party was the communist Jew Rudolf Slansky; in Yugoslavia, while Tito
held the spotlight, the communist Jew Moshe Pijade was the chairman of the
National Assembly and president of Serbia; and so it went. And this in a Europe
whose Jews supposedly had all been “Holocausted” by Hitler. There were tens of
millions of Hungarians and Poles and Latvians and Serbs and other eastern
Europeans under the yoke of communism who were wishing that Hitler had actually
“Holocausted” the Jews. These communist Jews were so hated by the eastern
Europeans they ruled and exploited that there was constant turmoil, and after
the Hungarian uprising in 1956, many of the leading communist Jews were
replaced by Gentile front men, while the Jews continued to exploit the people
from behind the scenes.
Even as the communist regimes of
eastern Europe began collapsing during the last 15 years or so and their
economies were “privatized,” Jews continued to plunder the people among whom
they lived. Using money from their brethren abroad and collusion with their
corrupt kinsmen still in the various governments, they managed to buy up the
most valuable factories, mines, and other national resources at fire-sale
prices and then milked them for all they were worth.
I apologize for the long digression,
but I wanted to make it clear just why so many of our young women in eastern
Europe are living in poverty today and are desperate to improve their
prospects, making them easy prey for Jewish slave dealers. It is the Jews who,
more than anyone else, are responsible for the impoverishment of eastern
Europe. The Jews, beginning with Karl Marx, invented communism, and then they
used it to exploit the Gentiles among whom they lived.
My second comment is that the women
lured and entrapped by Jewish slave dealers are made doubly easy prey because
they never have been warned to beware of Jews. And the reason that they never
have been warned is that the Jewish communists of every regime in eastern
Europe enacted legislation making it illegal to do so. To warn a young woman
never to trust a Jew – to tell a young woman what Jews are like and what they
do – is “hate speech,” and “hate speech” is a penal offense in nearly every
country of eastern Europe. Jews may not be criticized. It is illegal to tell
the truth about them. And of course, the Jews and their bought politicians and
their feminist and homosexual and minority allies are pushing hard for similar
laws against so-called “hate speech” in the United States.
Let’s return to the June 16 issue of
the Jerusalem Post, where I read to you how financially desperate
eastern European girls are lured to Israel with the promise of big salaries as
secretaries or teachers or caregivers. The article continues:
“But when they come to Israel their
passports and travel papers are taken away, in order to prevent them from
leaving. They are raped and beaten. Trafficked women are treated as objects, as
commodities to be bought and sold by pimps for thousands of dollars or held in
debt bondage, forced to work to pay off large sums of money. Their “owners”
imprison them in locked houses or apartments with barred windows. They can
rarely leave the apartment and are prevented from going out unaccompanied. They
are frequently abused, especially if they refuse to have sex with a customer or
try to escape. . . . In brothels, massage parlors, and sex clubs throughout the
country, these women “slaves” are subjected to violence, degradation, and
terror. According to a report released last month by Amnesty International
entitled ‘The Trafficking of Women to Israel,’ the country is rapidly becoming
a major destination for sex trafficking and slavery.”
Now, I should tell you that I am
skipping around in this long article and reading you just bits and pieces. It
is full of heart-rending stories about individual female slaves, and there’s
not time to read all of them to you. One of the stories is about Anna, a
31-year-old unemployed physics teacher from St. Petersburg. She was lured to
Israel by a Jew who promised her good working conditions and $1000 a month,
which was 20 times what her salary had been in Russia. Now I’ll read to you
exactly what the Jerusalem Post says about Anna:
“Anna arrived here in October 1998
on a tourist visa. She was met at the airport and taken to an apartment and
locked up with six other women . . . [from eastern Europe]. She was auctioned
twice and finally bought for $10,000. Taken to Haifa, she was held in captivity
with two other women. The apartment in which she lived had bars on the
windows.” Et cetera. The article goes on to say that the Jew who had bought
Anna repeatedly reminded her that he knew where her family lived in St.
Petersburg, and that he would harm them if she escaped or failed to obey his
orders. Anna was not able to escape, but she finally was deported back to
Russia by Israeli immigration authorities because her tourist visa had expired.
Her former “owner” remains at liberty, and Anna remains in terror that he will
one day show up again at her residence in St. Petersburg.
Then there is the story of a young
woman from Belarus – from White Russia. Again, I read the exact words of the Jerusalem
Post:
“Tatiana (not her real name) had been
promised a job working as a cleaner in a hotel in Eilat. She was told the job
would pay enough to support her mother and six-year-old son. In Eilat a man
pretending to be from the hotel where she thought she was going to be employed
took her to a brothel, where she was forced to work as a prostitute. She was
told that she would have to repay her ‘sale price’ and travel costs. She tried
unsuccessfully to escape and was finally freed after a police raid. She was
held in Neveh Tirza. Three days after her arrest Tatiana found an anonymous
note on her prison bunk threatening to kill her and punish her family if she
spoke out about what had happened to her. She petitioned the chief of police
but was told that the Israel Police cannot guarantee anyone’s safety abroad.
She testified in June 1999 and was deported later that month. . . . Her fate is
not known. A police spokesman refused to comment on the case.” End of Tatiana’s
story.
Now, listen very carefully, because
we are getting to the real meat of this article. I will read you exactly what
the Jerusalem Post says about the role of the Israeli government and
Israeli law in this horrifying business. I quote:
“In Israel prostitution is not
illegal. Nor is there legislation against trafficking or slavery, though there
is a law forbidding taking people out of the country by force. Police officials
complain that in the absence of legislation their options are limited. . . .”
Now I’m skipping to another paragraph, and again I quote:
“According to the statistics provided
by the Israel Police, in 1997 between 500 and 600 police files were opened
under Article 10 of the penal code, which covers prostitution and obscenity
offenses. An unknown additional number of cases against traffickers and pimps
were also opened under other sections of the penal code, for crimes such as
assault, kidnapping, and unlawful possession of passports. And though the
police have opened more than 1,100 files during the past three years, only 126
cases against men involved in trafficking have actually been brought to court.
During the same period more than 1,200 women were deported from Israel.
According to sociologist Esther Herzog, director of Shin – “The Movement for
Equal Representation for Women” – in 1999 the police arrested more than 400
women but only 28 pimps. And even these minuscule numbers, she says, are
probably inflated. Since there is no law here against trafficking in human
beings or slave trading, it is impossible to know how many of the above cases
were related to trafficking, and how many were connected to
prostitution-related offenses, such as pimping or operating a brothel.” End of
quote.
I hope that you absorbed what I just
read: There is no law in Israel against trafficking in human beings or slave
trading – and consequently there is a flourishing trade in White slaves in
Israel today. I didn’t write that, and it’s not from the Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion. It was written by two female Israeli journalists and
published two weeks ago in a prominent Jewish newspaper in Jerusalem. You might
wonder why such devastating information was published by a Jewish newspaper.
There are a couple of reasons.
First, the same feminism which the Jews push so enthusiastically in America has
cropped up in Israel too. Jewish women always have resented the greater sexual
attractiveness which Gentile women have for Jewish men. After all, there’s not
much a Jewess can do about her face or her personality. Too many Jewesses look
like Ana Pauker or Madeleine Albright and swear like Madeleine Albright. These
Russian and Ukrainian girls being forced into prostitution in Israel not only
are better looking, but they are much softer and more feminine than Israeli
women. I believe that there is no question but that Israeli Jewesses would like
to see them out of Israel. They don’t like the sexual competition, and as
organized feminists they have enough muscle to be able to express their views
in Israel’s mass media.
That’s one reason this article
appeared in the Jerusalem Post. The other reason is that the Jews who
publish the Jerusalem Post understand that there’s no real danger that
the Jews will be called to account for their slave trafficking. They understand
that with their control of the mass media everywhere in the Gentile world, they
can say whatever they want among themselves with little risk that the soccer
moms or couch potatoes of America will ever hear about it; and if they do
happen to hear about it, they won’t believe it; and even if they do believe it
they’re too demoralized and spineless to do anything about it.
Want to try an experiment? Get
yourself a xerox copy of the June 16 Jerusalem Post article from a
library. If that issue has mysteriously disappeared by the time you get to the
library, send me $25 for my time and trouble and I’ll xerox my copy of the
article and mail it to you. Take your copy of the article to the editor of your
local newspaper. Send a copy to your congressman. Have your kid take it to his
high school social studies teacher for class discussion. If you’re a university
student enrolled in a class in international relations or ethics or law or any
subject relevant to this article, take it to your professor and ask him what he
thinks about it.
I’ll guarantee you: not one of these
people will appreciate having this matter brought to his attention. The
newspaper editor and the congressman will already know about it, but they won’t
want to talk about it. The high school social studies teacher would prefer that
your kid bring a case of live hand grenades to class for discussion. And the
university professor will have visions of his chances for tenure evaporating if
he can’t get you to shut up and go away quickly. And as I said at the beginning
of this program, the average lemming will find the whole issue unreal because
he didn’t see it on TV. You won’t even be able to embarrass a Jew with it.
He’ll just brazenly deny it and accuse you of “anti-Semitism.”
That, unfortunately, is the state of
public and private morale in America today. That’s why our civilization is
going down the tubes. That’s why Timothy McVeigh blew up the Federal building
in Oklahoma City. It was the only way he knew to get people to look up from
their ball games for a minute and pay attention to what’s happening to their
world.
So, why do I bother? I bother
because between the ball-game fans at one end and the corrupt politicians and
corrupt Christian preachers and corrupt newspaper editors at the other end
there is an intelligent and responsible two percent or so of the population – a
moral two percent – capable of understanding and caring about what the Jews are
doing to our world and to our people. And these Russian and Latvian and
Hungarian girls lured to Israel and forced into a life of slavery and
degradation are our people.
Among the moral two per cent of the
U.S. population there are people who care as much as I do about the fact that
their government sends billions of dollars a year to prop up a regime which
permits beautiful, young White girls to be stripped, raped, beaten, put up on
an auction block, and sold to whichever leering, swarthy, hook-nosed kike makes
the highest bid. We fight wars to protect that regime from its Arab neighbors.
We permit the kinsmen of those who make up that regime to control our mass
media of news and entertainment. We condemn the Germans for trying to free
themselves from such control.
There are Americans who care about
these things as much as I do. And by God, we intend to do something about these
things, even if we have to do it Timothy McVeigh’s way. I hope it doesn’t come
to that, but we will break the grip of these Jews and their collaborators on
our society.
Friday, August 17, 2018
The Strange Life of Ilya Ehrenburg
by Mark Weber
Ilya Ehrenburg, the leading Soviet propagandist of the Second World War, was
a contradictory figure. A recent article in the weekly Canadian Jewish News
sheds new light on the life of this „man of a thousand masks.“ [1]
Ehrenburg was born in 1891 in Kiev to a non-religious Jewish family. In
1908 he fled Tsarist Russia because of his revolutionary activities. Although
he returned to visit after the Bolshevik revolution, he continued to live
abroad, including many years in Paris, and did not settle in the Soviet Union
until 1941. A prolific writer, Ehrenburg was the author of almost 30 books. The
central figure of one novel, The Stormy Life of Lazik Roitschwantz, is a
pathetic „luftmensch,“ a recurring character in Jewish literature who seems to
live „from the air“ without visible means of support.
As a Jew and a dedicated Communist, Ehrenburg was a relentless enemy of
German National Socialism. During the Second World War, he was a leading member
of the Soviet-sponsored Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee. (At fund-raising rallies
in the United States for the Soviet war effort, two leading members of the
Committee displayed bars of soap allegedly manufactured by the Germans from the
corpses of murdered Jews.)
Ehrenburg is perhaps most infamous for his viciously anti-German wartime
propaganda. In the words of the Canadian Jewish News: „As the leading
Soviet journalist during World War II, Ehrenburg's writings against the German
invaders were circulated among millions of Soviet soldiers.“ His articles
appeared regularly in Pravda, Izvestia, the Soviet military daily
Krasnaya Zvezda („Red Star“), and in numerous leaflets distributed to
troops at the front.
In one leaflet headlined „Kill,“ Ehrenburg incited Soviet soldiers to treat
Germans as sub-human. The final paragraph concludes: [2]
„The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use
the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We
shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not
killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day ... If you cannot
kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on
your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German
in the meantime. If you leave a German alive, the German will hang a Russian
and rape a Russian woman. If you kill one German, kill another -- there is
nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days,
do not count kilometers. Count only the number of Germans killed by you. Kill
the German -- that is your grandmother's request. Kill the German -- that is
your child's prayer. Kill the German -- that is your motherland's loud request.
Do not miss. Do not let through. Kill.”
Ehrenburg's incendiary writings certainly contributed in no small measure
to the orgy of murder and rape by Soviet soldiers against German civilians.
Until his death in 1967, „his support for the Soviet state, and for Stalin,
never wavered,“ the Canadian Jewish News notes. His loyalty and service
were acknowledged in 1952 when he received the Stalin Prize. In keeping with
official Soviet policy, he publicly criticized Israel and Zionism.
The Canadian Jewish News further writes:
„ … The recent disclosure that Ehrenburg arranged to transfer his private
archives to Jerusalem's Yad Vashem library and archive, while still alive,
comes as a stunning revelation. The reason this information has come to light
only now is that Ehrenburg agreed to transfer his archive on condition that the
transfer, and his will, remain secret for 20 years after his death. On Dec. 11
[1987], with the 20-year period expired, Israel's daily Maariv related
Ehrenburg's story…”
The collection includes material about the important wartime Jewish
partisan movement. Among the documents in the collection is one concerning a
pogrom in Malalchovka, a village near Moscow, which took place in 1959.
This new revelation about one of the most influential figures of the
Stalinist regime shows that, whatever he may have said for public consumption,
Ehrenburg never privately disavowed Zionism or forgot his ancestry.
Notes
1. Rose Kleiner, „Archives to throw new light on
Ehrenburg,“ Canadian Jewish News (Toronto), March 17, 1988, p. 9.
2. Alfred de Zayas, Nemesis at Potsdam (London:
Roudedge & Kegan Paul, 2nd edition, 1979), pp. 6546, 201; Erich Kern (ed.),
Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: FZ- Verlag, 1988), pp. 260-61, 353-55.
From: The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1988-89 (Vol. 8, No.
4), pp. 507-509.
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Poland Mass Graves in Malbork
By Darius Cierpialkowski
Published: 2018-08-08
64 years after the end of World War Two,
construction workers have unearthed a mass grave with the bones of 2 000 people
near Marienburg Castle in Malbork, Poland, the former Marienburg. The evidence
suggests the bodies are mostly of German civilians -- men, women and children
-- killed in early 1945 towards the end of the war.
Sunday, August 12, 2018
Jim Traficant: Exposing Israel’s Control of America
James Traficant
was one of the most heroic politicians in the past hundred years, and that’s
why his tractor flipped and killed him.
Thursday, August 9, 2018
Monday, August 6, 2018
When Truth Fears Investigation: On August 5th We Honor the Life of Ernst Zündel
Source:
http://www.renegadetribune.com/when-truth-fears-investigation-on-august-5th-we-honor-the-life-of-ernst-zundel/
By John Wear
August 5, 2018 marks
the one-year anniversary of Ernst Zündel’s passing. He was essentially
kidnapped from the U.S. and forced to remain in Germany. His wife, Ingrid
Rimland, was unable to leave the U.S. to be with him. She risked jail time in
Germany despite having no previous criminal convictions.
His crime? Ernst Zündel was deemed a “security
threat.” Not because he was ever violent or ever incited violence, but because
he created a legal precedent in which:
For the first time ever, “Holocaust” survivors
and “Holocaust” historians were closely and critically questioned under oath
about their claims and views.
Few Canadians realize that Zündel did them “a
favor by wiping off the books [the] disgraceful False News laws” strangling
free-speech.
What They Do Not Tell You About the Life and Work of Ernst Zündel
An adapted extract from Revisionists. com.
Ernst Zündel (1939-2017) was a German-born publisher, author and civil
rights activist, who emigrated to Canada at the age of 19. He became a
successful graphic artist, with his work appearing, for example, on the front
cover of Canada’s national news magazine, Maclean’s. Setting aside
his thriving career, he dedicated himself to the great task, as he saw it, of
redeeming the sullied reputation of his fellow Germans.
For seven years he was held behind bars, first in Canada and then in
Germany, solely for the peaceful expression of non-conformist views. For some
time he was the most prominent political prisoner in the western world.
Zündel was an outgoing, good-humored man who was blessed with a rare
combination of unflagging optimism and practical ability. He was perhaps best
known as the defiant defendant in the much-publicized “Holocaust Trials” of
1985 and 1988. He was brought to court in Toronto on a charge of “publishing
false news,” and specifically for publishing a reprint edition of a booklet
entitled Did Six Million Really Die?
Zündel’s two lengthy trials were something close to full scale debates on
the Holocaust issue.
For the first time ever, “Holocaust” survivors and “Holocaust” historians
were closely and critically questioned under oath about their claims and views.
To wage the legal battle that was forced upon him, he brought together an
impressive international team of researchers, legal specialists, scholars, and
many others. From numerous libraries and archives in North America and Europe,
this group assembled at the “Zündelhaus” in Toronto one of the most extensive
collections of evidence anywhere on this chapter of history.
Among those who testified on Zündel’s behalf in the trials were Robert
Faurisson, David Irving, Mark Weber, William Lindsey, Udo Walendy, and Bradley
Smith. As a result of the two trials, an enormous quantity of evidence and
testimony challenging the prevailing Holocaust narrative was presented to the
court and thereby was made part of the permanent public record. Perhaps the
most important evidence was the historic testimony of American gas chamber
expert Fred Leuchter concerning his on-site forensic examination of the alleged
extermination gas chambers in Poland.
Zündel was found guilty in the 1985 trial, but the verdict was set aside by
the provincial appeals court. It ruled that the judge in that trial had, among
other things, given improper instructions to the jury, and had improperly
excluded defense evidence. At the conclusion of the second Zündel trial in May
1988, a jury declared him guilty. A few days later, he was sentenced to nine
months imprisonment.
French scholar Robert Faurisson wrote at the time:
Zündel may once again go to prison for his
research and beliefs or be threatened with deportation. All this is
possible. Anything may happen when there is an intellectual crisis and
a realignment of historical concepts of such a dimension. Revisionism
is the great intellectual adventure of the end of this century. Whatever
happens, Ernst Zündel is already the victor.”
On appeal, Canada’s Supreme Court threw out the 1988 conviction, declaring
on August 27, 1992, that the archaic “false news” law under which Zündel had
been tried and convicted was a violation of the country’s Charter of Rights.
This was more than a personal vindication by Canada’s highest court; Ernst Zündel
secured an important victory for the rights of all Canadians.
His next great legal battle was fought before the Canadian Human Rights
Tribunal [which operates outside of normal legal standards] in
Toronto. The charges, instigated by Jewish groups, accused Zündel of promoting
“hatred or contempt” against Jews through the “Zündelsite” website operated by
Ingrid Rimland from the United States. In this legal action, as the Tribunal’s
presiding Commissioner declared, the truth or validity of the supposedly
“hateful” items was not a consideration. (Ultimately the Tribunal declared the
“Zündelsite” to be unlawful, but because it is based in the U.S., the ruling
has been unenforceable).
During the 42 years he lived in Canada (1958-2000), Ernst Zündel was never
convicted of a crime. He was, however, repeatedly a victim of violence and
hate. He survived three assassination attempts, including by arson and pipe
bomb. Even Irv Rubin, the American Jewish Defence League leader, was caught
breaking into Zündel’s home with a member of the “Jewish Armed Resistance
Movement” who had previously claimed responsibility for one of the arson
attacks. He also endured years of legal harassment and repeated imprisonment.
After more than four decades in Canada, including a failed effort to
acquire Canadian citizenship, Zündel moved to the United States. On February 5,
2003, Ernst Zündel was arrested at home in the mountain region of eastern
Tennessee. U.S. authorities seized him on the pretext that he had violated
immigration regulations, or had missed an interview date with U.S. immigration
authorities, even though he had entered the U.S. legally, was married to Ingrid
Rimland, an American citizen, had no criminal record, and was acting
diligently, and in full accord with the law, to secure status as a permanent
legal resident.
After being held for two weeks, he was deported to Canada. For two years —
from mid-February 2003 to March 1, 2005 — he was held in solitary confinement
in the Toronto West Detention Centre as a supposed threat to national security.
His arrest and detention generated widespread media attention. A few
Canadian newspapers and several independent analysts acknowledged the injustice
of his incarceration. The country’s most prestigious daily, the Toronto
Globe and Mail, affirmed in an editorial (“Zündel doesn’t warrant a
security certificate,” March 6, 2004) that he posed no risk to
people or property, and that he was being held unjustly on a bogus “guilt by
association” pretext.
He has never been charged with a violent crime
and does not urge others to commit violence,” the editorial noted. “The real
danger to Canadians,” it concluded, comes not from individuals like Zündel,
“but from a government that casually discards their most precious rights.”
In another editorial (“The Zündel Case,” Oct. 23, 2004) the influential
paper called Canada’s treatment of Zündel an “abuse of the secret-trial
legislation.”
Bill Dunphy, a veteran investigative journalist and editor for the
daily Hamilton Spectator, also protested the injustice. He spent
six years probing Canada’s “white supremacist” movement, and got to know Zündel
well. Although he has no sympathy for Zündel’s views, in a hard-hitting column
(Hamilton Spectator, May 14, 2003) he told readers:
Our government has seized and branded Ernst
Zündel, stripped him of his human rights, tried him in secret and found him
wanting, and will now hand him over to a foreign government anxious to throw
him in jail …
… Zündel – who did this country a favor by
wiping off the books our disgraceful False News laws – has never once been
convicted of a criminal offense in this country, never once found to have
violated the hate crime laws that rest snugly around the throat of free
expression in this country.
Calculating correctly that there was no
political cost, no ‘down side’ to slipping on the jackboots to kick a reviled
old man out of our country, our government cobbled together their best insults
and innuendo, and Lord knows what secret ‘evidence,’ and branded Ernst Zündel a
threat to national security.
I know this man, his local and international
contacts and I know this movement. And after reading the 58-page ‘unclassified’
summary of the government’s case, I can assure you there is no justice here.
Their ‘evidence’ is riddled with errors and misinformation, hearsay and
inflammatory innuendo. Dead men walk again, and the shattered bits of shoddy
secret networks long since collapsed under the weight of their own ineptitude
are made whole and menacing once again. It is a shameful piece of dishonest,
unreliable tripe.”
Zündel was held in Canada not because his views are unpopular, or because
he was a “security risk.” He was in prison because Jewish groups wanted him
there, and because he promoted views that the Jewish-Zionist lobby considers
harmful to its interests.
This lobby was the decisive, critical factor in the decades-old campaign to
silence him. The only sustained and institutionalized effort in Canada to
imprison Zündel came from this lobby, which includes the Simon Wiesenthal
Center, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance
Association, and the League for Human Rights of B’nai B’rith (Canada’s
counterpart to the U.S.-based “Anti-Defamation League”).
On March 1, 2005, Zündel was deported to Germany, just as Jewish groups had
been demanding. Upon his arrival at Frankfurt airport, he was immediately
arrested and taken to Mannheim prison to await trial for the “thought crime” of
“denying the Holocaust.”
A few months later the public prosecutor in Mannheim formally charged
Zündel with inciting “hatred” by having written or distributed texts that
“approve, deny or play down” genocidal actions carried out by Germany’s wartime
regime, and which “denigrate the memory of the [Jewish] dead.” …. The 14
specific violations cited by the court included postings on the U.S.-based “Zündelsite”
website. The court thus upheld efforts by German authorities to punish
individuals for writings that are legal in the country where they are
published. Jewish groups quickly, and predictably, expressed approval of the
verdict.
Zündel was released from prison on March 1, 2010 — five years after his
deportation to Germany, and three years after his conviction by a court in
Mannheim. Banned from returning to either Canada or the U.S., he went to his
family home in Germany’s Black Forest region, where he resided until his death.
Unable to leave the U.S. and be with him, his wife Ingrid Rimland died two
months later.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)