The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Friday, November 30, 2018
Tuesday, November 27, 2018
Jews and Economics
"America
is full of businesses bearing old Christian names, but which are really owned
and run by Jews. Most of them have been acquired in the manner I have just
described, the way the Jew creates something out of nothing (slow strangling).
The Jew, better than anyone else in the world knows how to dispossess the poor
and the members of the middle classes. To fit this case, the old P.T. Barnum
adage needs only a little changing. A gentile enters business every minute,
with two Jews waiting to take him out of it." (Jews Must Live, Samuel Roth)
"Reduced
to its own resources since France...gave it financial autonomy and this
Colonial Parliament, at first consultative and then deliberative, of the
Financial Delegations...Algeria is incapable of assuring by its own resources
the crushing expense of the first establishment of administration and upkeep
which falls upon it. The economic equipment is too heavy because of the
immensity of its territory and the insignificance of its population...At
present the fellah has no longer anything but his dried skin stretched upon his
bones, and he must pay the contracts, the banks, and above all the Jew." (Le Péril Juif, Charles Hagel).
"I
found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and sessionists had
become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to
stop it. The gold can have but one use - the purchase of arms and
ammunition...Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself or the
Secretary of Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews) I have stopped
it. The cotton speculators are quite clamorous for aid in getting their cotton
away from Middleburg, Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to pay liberally for the
service. I think I can bring it away with safety, and make pay to the
government. As some of the Jew owners have as good as stolen the cotton from
the planters, I have no conscientious scruples in making them pay liberally to
take it away."
(General W.T. Sherman, in a letter
written from Memphis, July 30, 1862).
"I
have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused
into post commanders, the specie regulations of the Treasury Department have
been violated and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well
satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officer at
Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come south, and I have frequently had
them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in
spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged
class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any wood yard on the river
and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton
themselves they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at a military
post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes
which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate in gold." (Grant, addressed the Assistant Secretary of War, C.P. Wolcott,
December 17, 1862, from the Headquarters of the Thirteenth Army Corps at
Oxford, Mississippi).
"The
Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the
Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the
Department within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order. Post
commanders will see that all of this class of people be furnished passes and
required to leave, and any one returning after such notification will be
arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them
out as prisoners, unless furnished with permit from headquarters. No passes
will be given these people to visit trade headquarters for the purpose of
making personal application for trade permits." (General Order No. 11, By order of Maj. General U.S. Grant, Jno. A.
Rawlins, Assistant Adjutant-General, Commander of the Thirteenth Army Corps,
Department of Tennessee).
"The
reason these general monopolies are formed by Jews is that the Jew is
international, tenacious and determined upon reaching the very end of his task.
He is not satisfied in any trade until that trade is, as far as possible, under
his complete control, and he has for the extension of that control the support
of his brethren throughout the world. He has at the same time the international
knowledge and international indifference which further aid his efforts. But
even were the quite recent monopolies in metal and other trades taken, as they
ought to be taken, from these few alien masters of them, there would remain that
partial monopoly...which a few Jews have exercised not only today, but
recurrently throughout history, over the highest finance; that is, over the
credit of the nations, and therefore today, as never before, over the whole
field of the world's industry." (Hilaire Belloc, The
Jews, p. 94).
"The
genius of the Jew is to live off people; not off land, nor off the production
of commodities from raw material, but off people. Let other people till the
soil; the Jew, if he can, will live off the tiller. Let other people toil at
trades and manufacturers; the Jew will exploit the fruits of their work. That
is his peculiar genius." (The International Jew; The
World's Foremost Problem, Dearborn Publishing Co., (1921), Vol. II, p. 31).
"We
see the Jew, then, in business, as promoter, money-lender, salesman par
excellence, the author and chief instigator of a system of credit by which a
nation-wide usury rises like a Golem (a created monster) with a million hands
on a million throats, to choke the honor and the freedom-of-movement of a
hard-working people."
(Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live, p. 123).
"Give
me control of the money of a country and I care not who makes her laws." (Meyer Rothschild)
"...[We]
must stop these swarms of Jews who are trading, bartering and robbing." (General William Sherman).
"The
ruin of the peasants in these provinces are the Zhids ['kikes']. They are full-
fledged leeches sucking up these unfortunate provinces to the point of
exhaustion."
(Nikolai I, Tsar of Russia from 1825 to
1855, in his diaries)
The
English writer Frances Trollope estimated that at least 200,000 English
children were "snatched away" to factories, "...taken and lodged
amid stench, and stunning, terrifying tumult; driven to and fro until their
little limbs bend under them...the repose of a moment to be purchased only by
yielding their tender bodies to the fist, the heel or the strap of the
overlooker (overseer)."
(Chattel Slavery and Wage Slaver, Marcus
Cunliffe, p. 73).
"Jew
storekeepers have already learned the advantage to be gained from this
[unlimited credit]: they lead on the farmer into irretrievable indebtedness,
and keep him ever after as their bondslave hopelessly grinding in the
mill." (Across the Plains, by Scottish writer
Robert Louis Stevenson, 1850-1894)
"No
traveller has seen a plot of ground ploughed by Jews, a manufacture created or
supplied by them. In every place into which they have penetrated they are
exclusively given up the trades of brokers, dealers in second hand goods and
usurers, and the richest amongst them then become merchants, chandlers and
bankers. The King of Prussia wished to establish them in his States and make
them citizens; he has been obliged to give up his idea because he has seen he
would only be multiplying the class of retailers and usurers. Several Princes
of Germany and barons of the Empire have summoned them to their states,
thinking to gain from them great advantages for their commerce; but the
stock-jobbing of the Jews and their usury soon brought into their hands the
greater part of the current coin in these small countries which they
impoverished in the long run." (Official Report of
Baron Malouet to M. de Sartinne on the demands of the Portuguese Jews in 1776;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 167)
"The
Jews in this particular sphere of activity far outnumbered all the other
'dealers'...The Jewish trafficker in women is the most terrible of all
profiteers of human vice; if the Jew could only be eliminated, the traffic in
women would shrink, and would become comparatively insignificant." (Jewish Chronicle, April 2, 1910).
DO YOU KNOW WHO
REALLY BROUGHT THE BLACK SLAVES TO AMERICA?
The following information is documented in 4 volumes
by Elizabeth Donnan, with Documents illustrative of the slave trade in America.
They can be found in the National Library Washington, D.C. and in the Carnegie
Institute of Technology Library, Pittsburgh, PA.
Name of Ship: Owners:
Abigail.......... Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy and Jacob
Franks
Crown............ Isaac Levy and Natham Simpson
Nassau........... Moses Levy
Four Sisters..... Moses Levy
Anne and Eliza... Justus Bosch and John Adams
Prudent Betty.... Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix
Hester........... Mordecai and Davdi Gomez
Elizabeth........ Mordecai and Davdi Gomez
Antigua.......... Natham Marston and Abram Lyell
Betsy............ Wm. De Woolf
Polly............ James De Woolf
White Horse...... Jan de Sweevts
Expedition....... John and Jacob Roosevelt
Charlotte........ Moses and Sam Levy; Jacob Franks
Caracoa.......... Moses and Sam Levy
DIODORUS SICULUS. First century Greek historian.Observed that Jews treated other people
as enemies and inferiors. "Usury" is the practice of lending money at
excessive interest rates. This has for centuries caused great misery and
poverty for Gentiles. It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!
BERNARDINO OF FELTRO. 15th century Italian priest. A mild man who
extolled patience and charity in normal circumstances, he described himself as
a "barking dog" when dealing with Jews: "Jewish usurers bleed
the poor to death and grow fat on their substance, and I who live on alms, who
feed on the bread of the poor, shall I then be mute before outraged charity?
Dogs bark to protect those who feed them, and I, who am feed by the poor, shall
I see them robbed of what belongs to them and keep silent?" (E. Flornoy, Le Bienbeureux Bernardin the
Feltre)
HILAIARE BELLOC, in the book THE JEWS, page
9: "There is already something
like a Jewish monopoly in high finance... here is the same element of Jewish
monopoly in the silver trade, and in the control of various other metals,
notably lead, nickel, quicksilver. What is most disquieting of all, this
tendency to monopoly is spreading like a disease."
H.H. BEAMISH, in New York Speech, October
30, 1937: "The Boer War
occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like
Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the
gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild
controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and
Moses controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably
pollute."
W. HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday
Evening Post, June 19, 1919: "The
Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not a gold field
or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does not pay them a heavy
tribute. They are the real owners of the antipodean continent. What is the good
of our being a wealthy nation, if the wealth is all in the hands of German
Jews?"
GREGORY I ('The Great'). Protested wholesale circumcision of
Christian slaves by Jewish traders, who monopolized the slave trade in Europe
and the Middle East and were widely suspected of supplying white girls to
Oriental and African buyers.
GRANT, USYSSES S. 19th century American general,
politician. While in command of the 13th Army
Corps, headquartered at Oxford, Mississippi, he became so infuriated at Jewish
camp-followers attempting to penetrate the conquered territory that he finally
attempted to expel the Jews: "I have long since believed that in spite of
all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the special
regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by
Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that
I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews
to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but
they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to
prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere.
They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the
country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for
someone else, who will be at military post with a Treasury permit to receive
cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed
rate, paying gold. (Letters to C. P.
Wolcott, assistant secretary of war, Washington, December 17, 1862)
1). The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation
of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders,
are hereby expelled from the Department.
2). Within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this
order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are
furnished with passes and required to leave, and anyone returning after such
notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity
occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from
these headquarters.
3). No permits will be given these people to visit
headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.
By order of Major Gen. Grant Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General (General Order Number 11, December 17, 1862)
The expulsion order was immediately countermanded by
the general-in-chief, H. W. Halleck, in Washington. Apparently the expelled
Jews had immediately contacted their kinsmen there and had pressure brought to
bear.
SHERMAN, WILLIAM T. 19th century American
soldier. In a letter from Union-occupied Memphis, July 30, 1862, he wrote: "I found so many Jews and speculators
here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing
anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have
but one use - the purchase of arms and ammunition... Of course, I have
respected all permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in
these new cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it." (The Sherman
Letters)
ROSS, L. F. 19th century American military
man. As did Generals ULYSSES S.
GRANT and WILLIAM T. SHERMAN, Ross confronted Jewish 'carpetbagging' cotton
traders preying upon captured Confederate areas during the Civil War. In a
letter to General John A. McClernand, he wrote: "The cotton speculators
are quite clamorous for aid in the getting their cotton away from Middleburg,
Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to pay liberally for the service. I think I can
bring it away with safety, and make it pay to the Government. As some of the
Jew owners have as good as stolen the cotton from the planters, I have no
conscientious scruples in making them pay liberally to take it away."
OLMSTED, GREDERICK LAW. 19th century
American architect, historian. "A
swarm of Jews has, within the last ten years, settled in every Southern town,
many of them men of no character, opening cheap clothing and trinket shops,
ruining or driving out of business many of the old retailers, and engaging in
an unlawful trade with the simple Negroes, which is found very profitable. (The Cotton Kingdom. For other views on
Jewish involvement in exploiting the South, see ULYSSES S. GRANT and MARK
TWAIN.)
(1) Every big and small Jew is the peddling trade must
renew his license every year.
(2) Checks and other obligations are only redeemable
if the Jew can prove that he has obtained the money without cheating. (Ordinance of March 17, 1808. Napoleonic Code.)
Saturday, November 24, 2018
The Shocking Jewish Role in Slavery Part II - The Media Coverup
Dr.
David Duke exposes the Jewish role in the African and global slave trade.
Thursday, November 22, 2018
Tuesday, November 20, 2018
Thoughts on the “Holocaust”
The dishonest label “Holocaust denier” is used to prevent questioning.
Source: American Dissident Voices broadcast,
February 8, 1997; reprinted in Free Speech magazine, March 1997, Volume III, No. 3
by Dr. William L. Pierce
There has
been a lot of commotion in the controlled media recently about Swiss bankers
who supposedly are hiding the assets of various Jews who perished more than 50
years ago, during the Second World War, in the so-called “Holocaust.” The idea
is that during the war Jews in Germany, France, and other European countries
squirreled their money away in secret Swiss bank accounts so the Germans
couldn’t get it. Then the Jews were hauled off to concentration camps or
otherwise came to an end, and their money still remains in the secret Swiss
accounts. The news stories have hinted that the Swiss bankers have been remiss
in simply keeping the money in the accounts, rather than searching for heirs or
turning it over to Jewish organizations. It has been suggested that billions of
dollars of Jewish money is being kept from the Jews to whom it rightfully
belongs. Jewish groups are demanding that the Swiss set up a fund immediately
to reimburse “Holocaust” survivors.
The Swiss, who are proud of the
integrity of their banking system, are naturally indignant about these Jewish
allegations that they have behaved improperly. The outgoing president of
Switzerland, Jean-Pascal Delamuraz, called the Jewish media campaign
“extortion” and “blackmail.” The Jews and the media have responded by clamoring
even more insistently that the Swiss should pay billions of dollars to the
Jews. In fact they now have begun making demands against Sweden as well. The
Jews claim that the Germans bought raw materials from Sweden during the war
using gold that had been confiscated from Jews, and that now Sweden owes that
gold to Jewish “Holocaust” survivors.
It’s really an amazing campaign. The
Swiss bankers have said repeatedly that they have checked their inactive
accounts in the past, and that they are holding at most a few million dollars
which may belong to the relatives of Jews who died during the war, that it
could not possibly amount to the billions of dollars the Jews are claiming, and
that they have treated the accounts of their Jewish depositors just like they
treat all of their accounts. Yet the media virtually ignore what the Swiss say
and continue to raise a huge hullabaloo about the poor, persecuted Jews and how
they are being done wrong by the Swiss and the Swedes. And, of course, the U.S.
politicians are jumping into the act, demanding that the Swiss and the Swedes
satisfy the Jews. It’s really amazing.
You know, I haven’t talked much in
the past about the so-called “Holocaust,” because I’ve felt that really is a
job for the historians, and I’m not a professional historian. Unfortunately,
however, the “Holocaust” is one of those politically sensitive subjects which
makes professional historians very nervous. Jews – and apologists for the Jews –
have written literally thousands of “Holocaust” books during the past 50 years,
and many of the claims made in these books are patently false. The professional
historians know that, but they hesitate to say anything, lest they be branded
as “Holocaust deniers” by the powerful Jewish organizations and by the
controlled news media.
Because of this timidity on the part
of the professionals, perhaps we amateurs really have an obligation to speak
out more. This whole “Holocaust” business is a fascinating subject, and there’s
much to be learned from looking into it, even if one isn’t a professional
historian. Take, for example, the label of “Holocaust denier,” which is pasted
on anyone who dares to ask questions about the “Holocaust.” If I comment
publicly that the official figure for the number of Jews who died in the big
concentration and labor camp at Auschwitz, in Poland, has been revised downward
recently by the Polish government from an earlier figure of four million to
about one million, and I suggest that perhaps that means that the famous figure
of “six million” Jews killed by the Germans also needs to be revised downward –
if I make such a suggestion, then I’m immediately denounced as a “Holocaust
denier.” That’s the standard phrasing that’s been agreed on by all of the big
Jewish outfits, the news media, the bought politicians, and so on: “Holocaust
denier.” That’s what you’re called if you question anything about the official
myth. It’s a crooked tactic. It deliberately makes it look like you’re denying
that there ever was any such thing as a “Holocaust.” It’s a label that’s
designed to make any questioner look like some sort of extremist who denies
that anything at all happened to the Jews during the Second World War. That’s crooked,
isn’t it?
I know that Jews were killed during
the war. I’ve talked with German soldiers who shot Jews. In the war against the
Soviet Union and Communism, the Germans found that virtually all of the Jews
they encountered on the Eastern Front were Communist partisans, that Jews were
heavily involved in Communist guerrilla activities, in sabotage, and in other
hostile actions against the Germans. Often the only way to pacify an area was
to round up all of the Jews and ship them off to a concentration camp or to
shoot them. Most of the other folks on the Eastern Front – the Poles, the
Ukrainians, often even the Russians – were happy enough to have the German Army
get the Communists off their backs, but the Jews were fanatically
pro-Communist. The Soviet Political Commissars who were attached to all Red
Army units to spy on ordinary Russian soldiers and look for any signs of
Political Incorrectness nearly always were Jews, and the German Army in many
cases separated these Jewish Political Commissars from their Russian prisoners
of war and shot the commissars.
I also know that Germans didn’t like
Jews, and Hitler especially didn’t like them, and as a consequence the German
government tried very hard to encourage Jews to leave Germany, even before the
war. Laws were passed limiting Jewish participation in some professions – such
as the law and publishing – where they were heavily overrepresented.
So I know that something did happen
to the Jews in Europe both before and during the Second World War, and if they
want to call that something a “Holocaust,” that’s all right with me. I don’t
deny that something did happen. I don’t deny that there was a “Holocaust.” I’m
just interested in checking the details, in checking the facts. But as soon as
I or anyone else does that, we’re called “Holocaust deniers.”
That’s interesting, because the
obvious intent of the people who use that label is to discourage us from asking
questions. They don’t want the details checked. They don’t want anyone looking
for any facts other than the official facts they present to us. And after being
called a “Holocaust denier” a hundred times or so, I’ve come to believe that
the reason they don’t want their facts checked is that they know that in many
cases their facts are false. That’s really crooked – but I believe
that to be an accurate assessment of the situation.
I first became interested in the
“Holocaust” enough to want to check it out when I encountered some especially
fanciful accounts by so-called “survivors.” I read accounts by Jews who claimed
that they saw German soldiers grabbing Jewish babies by their legs and swinging
their heads against brick walls to smash out their brains. One Jewess told of
witnessing German soldiers carrying Jewish children one at a time up the stairs
to the top of a building, throwing them off, and laughing when they hit the
pavement below and were killed. Other Jews made the claim that they saw German
guards separate Jews out from prisoners arriving at concentration camps, pour
gasoline on them, and set them afire, right on the train platform. And there
were other stories about Jewish prisoners with colorful tattoos being selected
from the camps and then skinned so that their tattooed skin could be made into
lampshades. Now, these stories just didn’t jibe with what I knew about the
German Army and the German government during that period. I knew that the
Germans didn’t like Jews, but I also knew that the German Army was the
best-disciplined army in the world. I knew that they had a better record of
behavior in the countries they occupied than any other army in the Second World
War – including the U.S. Army. I had until that point believed the stories that
the Germans had methodically herded the Jews into gas chambers. But I really
doubted that any disciplined army would tolerate its soldiers just killing
prisoners for sport.
If you saw the anti-German
propaganda film which came out a couple of years ago, Schindler’s List, you
will remember that it portrayed the German commandant of a labor camp shooting
Jewish inmates with a hunting rifle from his balcony. That was the sort of
thing I had questioned when I first encountered these stories. And yet, very
few other people were questioning these accounts. Newspapers and magazines and
books were reporting them as if they were unquestionably true.
I began looking into the matter in
detail, and I discovered many interesting things. I discovered that some Jews
had been killed, and I discovered the circumstances under which they were
killed. I discovered that many more Jews simply died under the conditions that
existed toward the end of the war, when malnutrition and disease were rampant
in the prison camps. I discovered that the total number of Jews who were killed
and who died of disease was substantially less than the six million claimed by
the Jewish propagandists. Most important, I discovered that a great many lies
had been told about what had happened during the “Holocaust.” I discovered that
most of the tales about gas chambers – that is, the ones that could be checked
out – were not true. I discovered that not a single one of the stories about
bashing out babies’ brains or throwing children off buildings or shooting
prisoners with hunting rifles for sport, à la Schindler’s
List, could be substantiated, and that they were all almost certainly
false.
All of this is interesting in
itself; at least, it is interesting to me. It is a part of our history. I could
talk all day about the details, about the facts that I discovered when I began
looking into the “Holocaust,” but I don’t want to bore you. If you really want
to know the details, write to the Institute for Historical Review. They’re
experts, and they’re honest. Their address is:
Institute for Historical Review
P.O. Box 2739
Newport Beach, CA 92659
P.O. Box 2739
Newport Beach, CA 92659
To me what’s even more interesting
about the “Holocaust” story than all of the holes in it is the motivation
behind it, the way the story is being used today, and the response of various
elements of our society to it. Let’s go back for a moment to that deliberately
misleading label of “Holocaust denier” that I mentioned earlier. If you’ve
spent any time exploring the Internet – especially some of the political
discussion groups on the Internet – you’ll have heard that term “Holocaust
denier” often enough. It’s not that the “Holocaust” is a hot topic of
discussion on the Internet. It isn’t. But it is discussed occasionally, along
with just about every other topic under the sun, and it’s discussed openly,
without fear. The Internet is just about the only place left where one can
discuss politically sensitive topics openly. And that just drives the big
Jewish censorship organizations crazy. They don’t want any open discussion of
the “Holocaust.” They’re terrified of it. The Simon Wiesenthal Center has been
especially loud in its complaints about the lack of censorship on the Internet.
Without censorship, they complain, the “Holocaust deniers” can say anything
they want. If we don’t censor the Internet, the “Holocaust deniers” can come
right into your home and contaminate your child’s mind while he’s using his
computer to do his homework.
They’ve tried to intimidate people
into silence. They’ll have one of their own people claim to be a World War II
veteran, and his standard line will be, “Hey, don’t try to tell me there wasn’t
a Holocaust. I was there. I saw the bodies. So don’t try to tell me there
wasn’t a Holocaust.”
Now, that sort of tactic may work on
television, where they control the whole medium and no one can contradict them.
But on the Internet people have been contradicting them. People have been
saying, “Hey, we’re not trying to tell you there were no bodies. We just want
to know how many bodies. We want to know how they died.” But they will not
engage in a rational discussion with you. If one trick won’t silence you,
they’ll try another. They’ll say, “What difference does it matter how many? If
only one Jew were killed just for being a Jew, that’s a terrible crime. That’s
a Holocaust.” That’s supposed to embarrass you into shutting up. But on the
Internet you can come back and say, “Well, what about the Germans who were
killed just because they were Germans. What about the Russians and the
Ukrainians and the Hungarians who were killed by some Jewish Commissar just
because they were anti-Communists? Don’t they count? Wasn’t that a crime for
which someone should be held accountable?”
They don’t like to hear that. They
really don’t. Try it sometime, if you have a thick skin and don’t mind having
them shriek insults at you.
Their final line of defense is
governmental force, governmental repression. If they can’t embarrass you into
silence, they turn to the politicians and demand laws to make you shut up.
That’s what they’ve already done in Europe and in Canada, where you can be
jailed for being a “Holocaust denier” – which means, for questioning anything
at all about what really happened. There are many people in German prisons now
who made the mistake of saying, “Hey, I was a guard at such and such a prison
camp during the war, and there was no gas chamber there.” In Britain, they
already have laws against criticizing Jews, but they want the laws toughened,
and so they’ve turned to the politicians. And, I’m sorry to say, the
politicians in Britain are just about as crooked a lot as we have here. The
chairman of the British Labor Party, Tony Blair, is a real piece of filth, of
about the same quality as Bill Clinton. He hopes to be the new prime minister
after the parliamentary elections coming up in May. He has announced, with a
little prodding from the Labor Party’s Jewish backers, that when he is prime
minister he will propose a new law making “Holocaust denial” a specific crime,
so that anyone who questions whether or not there was a gas chamber in such and
such a place can be locked up, just as in Germany.
And that’s what they want in America
too. The Jewish lawyers and journalists and professors – and their Gentile
collaborators – already are working hard to persuade people that the First
Amendment to our Constitution needs to be scrapped, or at least rewritten. The
Founding Fathers never intended to protect all types of speech, they say. They
never intended to protect indecent or hurtful speech. And to deny the
“Holocaust” is indecent and hurtful. They’re working hard on it. The trendier
Gentiles already are falling into line. Believe me, they’ll be making a strong
push to abolish free speech in America soon. They’ll tell us that it’s for our
own good.
But it’s for their own good, not
ours. That’s the most interesting insight I gained from checking out the
“Holocaust.” I learned why they push it so hard, why they’ve made so many
Hollywood propaganda films like Schindler’s List, why they’ve told
so many whoppers about bashing out babies’ brains and making lampshades out of
skinned Jews, why they talked the politicians into letting them have a
Holocaust Museum in Washington, why they’ve gotten politicians at the state
level to pass laws requiring that the public schools carry “Holocaust”
indoctrination courses, and why they’re so desperate to stop people from asking
questions.
It’s not just because they’re afraid
of being exposed as liars if they stop defending their old lies with new lies.
It’s not just because they hate the Germans and like to beat them over the head
with the “Holocaust.” And it’s not just because they find the “Holocaust” a
convenient excuse for the crimes they have committed and still are committing
against the Palestinian people. There’s a much bigger reason than all of these
things – and a much more dangerous reason for us, for our people. But you are
an intelligent person with at least a little bit of open-mindedness, a little
bit of mental independence, or you wouldn’t be reading this magazine. Why don’t
you discover for yourselves why the Jews are so defensive about the
“Holocaust,” why they are so afraid for anyone to ask questions about it? It’s
an easy thing to do, and I believe it’ll be much more convincing if you find
out for yourselves, instead of having me tell you. There are thousands of books
out there that they’ve written. Go into any large bookstore or library and
you’ll find books about the “Holocaust” by the top “Holocaust” promoters, Jews
like Elie Wiesel and Simon Wiesenthal. Read these books with an open mind, with
a questioning mind. Think about the claims they make. Then get a copy of our
book catalog and read a couple of the books we sell – or read some books from the Institute for
Historical Review – and think about what you read in these books too. Make up
your own mind. I believe you’ll find it an illuminating and rewarding
experience.
* * *
Saturday, November 17, 2018
Memorabilia: Fear, Shame and Gas Chambers: The Failure of the American Academic Class
By Bradley R. Smith
Published: 2018-11-03
Why does the
American professorial class insist that students “believe” what they are told –
and told and told -- about Germans and Jews during World War 11? Why does the
American academic refuse to encourage students to create a free exchange of
ideas about what really happened during that fracas? Why? One word reveals the
story. That word is “shame.”
Wednesday, November 14, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)