HEIL HITLER!
The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Tuesday, December 31, 2019
Friday, December 27, 2019
Adolf Hitler About Religion
It is no
coincidence that religions are more stable than forms of government. They
mostly tend to sink their roots deeper into the earth; they would not be
conceivable at all without this broad folk.
Speech of
May 10, 1933 in Berlin
In that the government is determined to undertake the political and moral
detoxification of our public life, it creates and secures the prerequisites for
a really deep return of religious life.
Speech of
March 23, 1933 in Berlin
The Reich government, which sees in Christianity the unshakeable fundaments
of the folk’s ethics and morality.
Speech of
March 23, 1933 in Berlin
And no less have we taken up the struggle against the decomposition of
religion. Without us committing ourselves to any denomination, we have
nonetheless again given faith the prerequisite, because we were of the
conviction that the folk requires and needs this faith. We have thus taken up
the struggle against godlessness not with a few theoretical declarations, we
have exterminated it.
Speech of
October 14, 1933 in Berlin
The discussion of the new state with both Christian denominations: Filled
with the wish to secure for the German folk the great religious, ethical and
moral values anchored in both Christian denominations, we have eliminated the
political organizations, but strengthened the religious institutions. For a
contract with the energetic National Socialist state is more valuable to a
church than the struggle of denominational federations, which in their coalition-determined
politics of compromise must also buy personnel advantages for party supporters
with the surrender of ideals and of the really inner religious education and
consolidation of the folk. We all, however, live in the expectation that the
merger of the evangelical provincial churches and denominations into a German
evangelical Reich church may give real satisfaction to the yearning of those,
who believe they must fear in the absent-mindedness of evangelical life a
weakening of the strength of the evangelical faith in itself. In that the
National Socialist state has in this year proven its respect for the strength
of the Christian denominations, it expects the same respect from the
denominations for the strength of the National Socialist state!
Speech of
January 30, 1934 in Berlin
We have endeavored to produce the reconciliation of the denominations
with the new state, are determined - insofar as the evangelical denominations
are meant - to end their purely organizational fractionalization in a great
evangelical Reich church, filled with the conviction that it is not acceptable
to make a virtue out of the respect and consideration for the individual
states, forced on Martin Luther by need, in a time when the states themselves
already no longer exist. And we know: If the great reformer stood among us,
then he would - happy to have escaped the need of that time - just like Ulrich
von Hutten in his last prayer, think not of provincial churches, rather of
Germany and his evangelical church.
Proclamation
of September 5, 1934 in Nuremberg
The national government sees in both Christian denominations the most
important factors for the preservation of our folkdom. It will respect the
contracts made between them and the provinces. Their rights should not be
infringed. It expects, however, and hopes that the work on the national and
moral rejuvenation of our folk, which the government has made its task,
likewise receives the same appreciation. It will deal with all other
denominations with objective justice. But it cannot tolerate that membership in
a specific denomination or in a specific race could be a release from the
general legal obligations or even a license for unpunished committing or
toleration of crimes. The concern of the government is directed at the honest
coexistence of church and state.
Speech of
March 23, 1933 in Berlin
Not we, rather those before us, distanced themselves from it (from
Christianity). We have merely made a clean separation between politics, which
concerns itself with earthly things, and religion, which must occupy itself
with the spiritual.
Speech of
August 27, 1934 at Ehrenbreitstein
And above all, we have removed the priests from the marsh of political
party conflict and led them back into the church again. It is our will that
they should never return to an area, which is not created for them, which
degrades them and must invariably bring them into opposition to millions of
people, who inwardly want to be devout, but who want to see priests who serve
God and not a political party!
Speech of
October 24, 1933 in Berlin
Lord, you see, we have changed. The German folk is no longer the folk of
dishonor, of shame, of self-mutilation, of faintheartedness and of small faith.
No, Lord, the German folk is strong again in its will, strong in its
perseverance, strong in the endurance of all sacrifices. Lord, we will not
depart from you! Now bless our struggle for our freedom and thus our German
folk and fatherland!
Speech
of May 1, 1933 in Berlin
Tuesday, December 24, 2019
The Illustrated Protocols of Zion
by David Duke
This is a video preview of Dr. David
Duke’s new book, The Illustrated Protocols of Zion is an historical and
literary valuation of the original Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
He presents the case that Protocols
of Zion could well be titled the Protocols of „Zionism“ in that it predicts
many of the horrific wars and conflicts right down to the issues in the Israel
or „Zion“ of today and associated with Zionist power and influence that goes
far beyond the borders of Israel.
In this video and his book upon
which it is based, he shows that many of the most radical claims of the
Protocols are today proclaimed by Zionists themselves around the world. such as
domination of media, banking, and extensive power and influence in America, the
EU and in many governments around the world.
He quotes leading and influential
Zionists and Zionist media in showing that many of the most important
underlying themes can be documented in historical and contemporary terms.
Dr. Duke points out its true
history. He argues that the Protocols is obviously not the secret meeting of
earlocked „Elders of Zion“ anymore than 1984 is a true account of Big Brother
or Oceania.
He examines it as dystopian literature
that is amazingly prescient and predictive since its publishing well over a
century ago.
This video and the powerful
underlying book The Illustrated Protocols of Zion are essential materials to
understanding the Zionist issue from all perspectives.
A Phd in History, Dr. Duke shows how
vital assertions of the Protocols can be historically and contemporaneously
documented and that many of the most shocking claims of the Protocols can be
found in even more extreme expression by modern Zionism.
Sunday, December 22, 2019
Friday, December 20, 2019
Lies and the History Channel
Source: American Dissident
Voices broadcast of February 5, 2000
by Dr. William L. Pierce
The biggest
threat to our people – the biggest obstacle to our survival and progress – is
the Jewish control of the mass media of news and entertainment. I’ve said that
to you many times. Today I want to talk about some very specific examples of
the way in which this threat works. Last month a special television documentary
program began airing on the History Channel, which is a subsidiary of A&E
Television Networks. The “A&E” stands for “arts and entertainment.” The
name of the program is “Nazi America: A Secret History.” It purports to be a
serious history of the growth of the Nazi movement in America, starting with
the German-American Bund and its precursor organizations in the 1930s and
taking us right up to the present
I don’t have the time to view many
television programs except the national and international news each day,
primarily to see what the party line is: that is, to see what “spin” the Jews
are putting on the news. This History Channel documentary was of special
interest to me, however, because I was part of it. Beyond the fact that I’m in
the program, I knew intimately another person who was given major coverage in
the program, and I have detailed knowledge of several other persons and events
covered by the program. So when I viewed the program I paid careful attention
and took notes. What I noted generally about the program is that in addition to
the standard slant, which they put on everything they produce, there were a
number of very clear-cut and blatant lies: lies of both omission and
commission. And it occurred to me that these lies are so clear and so easily
refuted by anyone who knows the facts that I should share them with you. They
provide useful clues to Jewish motives – and also perhaps an antidote to other
Jewish lies.
One other thing about this
particular History Channel program: it will be shown more than once. You can
keep your eyes open for it and watch it the next time it is shown, keeping in
mind the facts I’ll share with you today. If you’re really serious about what’s
happening to America, you can even order a copy of the tape from the History
Channel and then study it yourself the way I did. It’ll cost you $29.95, but
the lesson is worth it.
The first thing to note is the
general slant of the program. That slant is to lump together everyone the Jews
consider a threat to their own plans for America as a “Nazi” and then to
portray Nazis as dangerous subversives and terrorists who need to be locked up
in order for the country to be safe. Nazis are portrayed as weird and
unpleasant people, strange and dangerous people, not at all like you and me.
The purpose behind this is not just lingering Jewish hatred for the German
Nazis, who put a real crimp in the Jews’ plans for Europe 60 years ago. It is a
current concern of the Jews that too many people are speaking out against them
today, and too many people are listening, especially with the Internet not yet
subject to Jewish censorship. The Jews’ aim is first to demonize the people who
don’t like them and then to outlaw them, cut them off from contact with the
public, keep them from speaking out.
So let’s look at the specifics. The
first part of the program deals with 1930s organizations such as Friends of the
New Germany and the German-American Bund, which tried to counter the Jews’
hate-propaganda against Germany in America, to build unity among
German-Americans, to help Americans generally understand what Adolf Hitler was
doing in his rebuilding of Germany, and to a lesser extent to propagate
Hitler’s National Socialist ideas in America.
And I should tell you now that this
part of the program on the German-American Bund, just like all the rest of the
program, is chock full of errors which are the result of ignorance and sloppy
research more than malice. For example, the program states that Hitler’s Mein
Kampf was published in 1924 and that Hitler was appointed chancellor of
Germany in 1932. Both dates are incorrect, as anyone can determine by reference
to an encyclopedia. In 1924 Hitler was in prison for revolutionary activity and
was just beginning to write Mein Kampf. And he didn’t become
chancellor until 1933. I point out these errors simply to remind you that the
controlled media very often are wrong in their facts even when they’re not
consciously lying, but they present those facts in an apodictic way, and few
Americans question them.
In its treatment of the Bund,
however, the program goes beyond sloppiness in its errors and turns to
deliberate deceit. It talks, for example, about New York Congressman Samuel
Dickstein’s investigation and harassment of the Bund and his labeling of it as
a subversive organization. What the people who wrote the program certainly knew
but neglected to tell the audience was that Congressman Dickstein was also a
Soviet espionage agent – not just a communist or communist sympathizer like so
many of his fellow Jews, but a secret agent actually on the payroll of the
Soviet NKVD. So in the 1930s what we had was a Jewish-Soviet espionage agent
pretending to be an American patriot denouncing what he called the
“un-American” influence of the Bund. Dickstein’s role as an NKVD agent was
revealed as old NKVD archives were opened following the collapse of communist
power and the breakup of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. But there wasn’t
a word of that in the History Channel program. Dickstein was represented simply
as a concerned congressman. But because he was a congressman and a Jew, both
the Roosevelt administration and the Jewish media collaborated with him in
railroading the Bund’s chairman, Fritz Kuhn, into prison on a trumped-up
embezzlement charge in 1939.
Not revealing Dickstein’s employment
by the NKVD was a lie of omission. A really outrageous lie of commission occurs
a little later in the program when it moves into the postwar period and focuses
on George Lincoln Rockwell, the World War Two Navy flier and combat veteran who
organized the National Socialist White People’s Party in the 1960s. The program
shows news footage of some of Rockwell’s public meetings in Washington, while
the program’s narrator comments that Rockwell – quote – “added gays and
Catholics to his list of threats to the future of the White race.” – end quote –
Then, between scenes of Rockwell speaking, a headline fills the screen. It
reads, and I quote: “Hate-Document Bared: ‘I will kill every Jew, Catholic and
Negro.'” – end quote – The clear implication is that this statement about
killing every Jew, Catholic, and Negro was made by Rockwell. But it wasn’t. It
was pure invention by the people who made this program.
I knew Rockwell quite well and
worked with him closely on the production of a magazine for a year before his
murder in 1967. He was totally removed from any sectarian bickering between
Catholics and Protestants and accepted them on an equal basis. He had a number
of practicing Catholics in his organization. This Jewish trick of trying to
divide Catholics from Protestants has been used before, but in Rockwell’s case
it is especially inappropriate. Furthermore, Rockwell never made a statement
about killing all homosexuals, although he certainly disapproved of homosexuality.
The deliberate deceit continues as
the program moves into the period after Rockwell’s death. The narrator
announces that Rockwell’s organization floundered after his death. . .
until the next Nazi leader came forward. Frank Collin emerged from Rockwell’s
shadow in 1970 . . . . I’m using the narrator’s exact words here. The
clear implication is that Frank Collin, a short, dark, hook-nosed, little man
with a flair for theatrics, was Rockwell’s successor. There is no mention at
all of Rockwell’s actual successor, a man named Matt Koehl.
And there is no mention that Collin
was a Jew. Not only was he a Jew, but he was a poseur and an exhibitionist,
pretending to be a National Socialist leader while putting on a media sideshow
which attracted to him a small group of losers and misfits who liked to wear
uniforms and strut around in public. While the media focused on Collin, whose
sole claim to fame was the uproar he generated when he announced that he
intended to march his uniformed freak show through Skokie, Illinois, a Jewish
suburb of Chicago, Rockwell’s real successor was left without access to the
media.
At the end of the Collin episode,
the narrator does reveal to us that Collin was convicted and sent to prison in
1979 for sexually molesting little boys, but we are left with the impression
that this smirking, prancing, child-molesting little Jew was a real National
Socialist, the successor of George Lincoln Rockwell. That’s the image of a
National Socialist, the image of a “Nazi,” that the writers of this program
deliberately and deceitfully plant in the public mind.
Actually, Collin was exposed as a
Jew in the Chicago press back in the 1970s. Interviews with his parents were
published in the newspapers. But that was more than 20 years ago, and the folks
at the History Channel figured that the public has forgotten about that. And
Frank Collin is not the only Jew trotted out as a “Nazi” by this program which
is supposed to tell us about the history of Nazis in America. The Columbine
killers, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, also are represented as “Nazis,”
although they are not named directly in the program. Instead, as images flash
across the screen, we hear the narrator naming a series of people involved in
recent killings, and the narrator tells us, one at a time, that they are Nazis.
James Burmeister, an 82nd Airborne
soldier at Fort Bragg, who shot a convicted Black drug dealer in Fayetteville,
North Carolina, in December 1995, is described as a “Nazi,” although there has
never been any evidence presented in this regard. Certainly, he was not a
member of any National Socialist group, or that fact would have been brought
out at his trial. Then there is John King, convicted in the dragging murder of
a Black in Jasper, Texas, in 1998. King also is described by the narrator as a
“Nazi,” although again there is no evidence to suggest this. What we do know
about King is that he acquired a burning hatred for Blacks after being
gang-raped by them while in prison.
Perhaps we are supposed to assume
that everyone who doesn’t like Blacks is a “Nazi” – perhaps even everyone who
is not Politically Correct. One of those in this series of supposed “Nazis” is
Benjamin Smith, who killed a Black and a Korean in drive-by shootings in
Illinois last year. Another is the apparently deranged Buford Furrow, who shot
a Filipino postman in California last year after wounding several Jews in a
Jewish community center. So far as we know, none of these killers was a “Nazi”
in the sense of having a serious belief in National Socialism and belonging to
a National Socialist group.
So the way the program worked the
Jewish Columbine killer Dylan Klebold into this series was to have the narrator
recite a series of names of killers while their faces flashed on the screen and
assert in each case that the killer is or was a “Nazi.” It went like this:
James Burmeister (face), John King (face), the Columbine killers (no face),
Benjamin Smith (face), Buford Furrow (face). Clever aren’t they? They know how
to lie without actually lying. Even a reasonably intelligent and perceptive
viewer will be tricked by this technique, unless he happens to know the facts.
The facts, of course, are that Dylan Klebold was a Jew, and both he and his
partner were outspoken anti-racists. But the average couch potato certainly
doesn’t know that, and so he falls into the trap of believing that the
perpetrators of the worst school massacre in U.S. history were “Nazis.”
Timothy McVeigh also is represented
in the program as a “Nazi” and the Oklahoma City bombing as an act of Nazi
terrorism. The narrator tells us: “McVeigh was a . . . neo-Nazi . . . .” There
is no evidence to suggest that he was or is. What we know about him is that he
hated the Clinton government and decided after the government burned all of
those women and children to death in the Branch Davidian church in Waco that he
would send the government a message. We also know that he read one of my books,
The Turner Diaries. If everybody who has read The Turner Diaries
is a Nazi, then the media Jews really have a problem on their hands, because
the number of readers is now somewhere close to half a million. But really,
that’s like saying that everyone who reads the New Testament is a Christian,
and everyone who reads the Old Testament is a Jew, and everyone who reads the
Koran is a Moslem.
A Nazi – a National Socialist – is a
person who holds a very specific set of beliefs, a person who accepts the
doctrine set forth in Hitler’s Mein Kampf, just as a Christian is a
person who accepts the teachings of Jesus and the claims made in the New
Testament about his miraculous origin and his resurrection, and a communist is
a person who believes the economic and social doctrines of the Jew Karl Marx.
This History Channel program starts with real Nazis – the leaders of the Bund –
continues with another real Nazi of a different sort – George Lincoln Rockwell –
and then cleverly ties these real Nazis into a series of Jewish child
molesters, antisocial freaks and exhibitionists of various sorts, and people
who have committed racial killings or acts of terrorism. And it’s all done very
smoothly, in a very slick way, a very Jewish way.
The aim, of course, is not only to
persuade viewers that Nazis are very unpleasant people – as if more than 60
years of anti-German propaganda films from Hollywood haven’t already done that –
but also to persuade us that Nazis are dangerous, and we need to do something
about them. We need new laws to protect ourselves from these dangerous Nazis.
You might wonder why they don’t just
tell us the truth about Nazis and let the chips fall where they may. Why not
just tell us that Nazis don’t believe in equality, that Nazis don’t believe in
multiculturalism and enforced diversity, that Nazis don’t believe that men and
women are the same? Why not just tell us that Nazis don’t approve of
homosexuality? Why not just tell us that Nazis aren’t democrats, that Nazis
believe in self-sufficiency and self-discipline and personal honor and a
natural hierarchy? Why not just tell us that Nazis are racists, and they don’t
like Jews? That should be enough, if all of the Jewish television propaganda
about equality and diversity and democracy has had the desired effect. That
should be enough to make every Politically Correct viewer hate Nazis. Why do
they feel it’s necessary to lie to us and try to make us believe that Nazis are
people like the Jewish child molester Frank Collin and the Jewish mass murderer
Dylan Klebold? Why do they feel it’s necessary to try to make us believe that
everyone who has tattoos and doesn’t like Blacks is a Nazi? Why do they feel
that it’s necessary to lie to us by telling us that Nazis want to kill
Catholics? Are they afraid that all of their anti-German hate propaganda and
all of their Political Correctness propaganda haven’t “taken”?
I’ll tell you what they’re afraid
of. They’re afraid of the truth. Listen to the part of this History Channel
program which is about me – that’s about 90 minutes into the program – and what
they’ll tell you is that all of the violence and strife in America during the past
few decades is the result of people reading my books, of people listening to
the ideas I talk about. If I hadn’t written The Turner Diaries, if I
didn’t have a radio broadcast every week, if I weren’t on the Internet, they’ll
have you believe, there wouldn’t have been an Oklahoma City bombing and a
dragging in Jasper, Texas, and a Columbine High School massacre, and we’d all
be getting along and loving one another in multicultural comfort and security.
And then they very slyly tell you:
Pierce is protected by his right to free speech, and they say it in a way that
means, Pierce was able to get away with putting people up to all of this
violent activity because he hides behind the First Amendment. What we need,
they suggest, are new laws to keep Pierce from hiding behind the First
Amendment. And you know, there are a lot of couch potatoes out there, a lot of
women of both sexes, who believe that.
I get hate mail every day from
people who ask me, “Aren’t you ashamed for causing all of those people to die
in Oklahoma City?” Others blame me for the Columbine High School massacre.
Really. They don’t blame the Clinton government. They don’t blame the liberals
for making a pigsty of America. They don’t blame the people who force the races
together and generate racial hatred by doing it. That would require independent
thinking. No, they blame me, and they nod their heads wisely and agree with the
History Channel narrator that we need new laws to keep people like Pierce from
causing violence.
The Jews and their hangers-on are
afraid of the truth getting to large numbers of people, especially through new
media such as the Internet, and they do want to put a stop to it. That’s why
they tell the sort of lies that this History Channel program is full of. They want
to scare the couch potatoes. And I want to make sure that the
independent thinkers see those lies and understand that they are lies
and also understand why they’re being told.
If you want to help me with this
work, then this History Channel program, “Nazi America: A Secret History,” is a
tool that you can use too. Talk to people you know about the lies in it. Help
people to understand the poisonous and destructive way in which the Jews use
their control of our mass media. Help people to understand that they’re not
being educated when they watch the History Channel; they’re being brainwashed;
they’re being lied to. And talk about the details.
I don’t know about you, but I’m
always skeptical when someone waves his arms and makes a general statement. I
want the specifics. I want the details. I want the facts, so that I can make up
my own mind. Anyway, that’s why I’ve spent so much time today talking with you
about this one History Channel program. It dealt with a subject that I happen
to know something about, so I could spot the lies and tell you about them. But
there are literally thousands of other programs out there which also are full
of lies. When you spot one, don’t keep quiet about it. Speak out. Tell other
people. And let me know about it too.
* * *
Tuesday, December 17, 2019
17 000 Baby Bodies Found in Jewish Abortionist’s Back Yard in 1981
Source: http://www.renegadetribune.com/17000-baby-bodies-found-in-jewish-abortionists-back-yard-in-1981/
In 1981, a
pathologist by the name of Malvin Weisberg was found to be storing 17,000
aborted bodies on his residential property, stored at room temperature in a
shipping container, his garage, and throughout his house. He had acquired the
bodies between 1976 and 1981. Malvin had also been actively defrauding both the
state of California and Federal governments to perform illegal pathology tests
on the bodies. What was the fall out of all this? A 2-year court case by the
Jewish ACLU to prevent Christians from burying the bodies, during which time
all the bodies were left to sit in another steel storage container, again at
room temperature. Malvin Weisberg was not charged for defrauding the government
and no further investigation was done to determine why he was squirreling away
aborted bodies en masse, or why a large portion of them were in a shipping
container in the first place. Was that even the first shipping container he had
filled? Was he even planning to dispose of the bodies?!
Saturday, December 14, 2019
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Ernst Zundel Converses with Dr. Fredrick Toben 1997
Ernst Zundel
of Canada converses with Dr. Fredrick Toben of Australia in 1997.
Monday, December 9, 2019
Friday, December 6, 2019
Is Criticism of Israel Already an Official Hate Crime in America?
Source: http://www.renegadetribune.com/is-criticism-of-israel-already-an-official-hate-crime-in-america/
By Philip Giraldi
One subject
that congressmen and the mainstream media tend to avoid is the erosion of
fundamental liberties in the United States as a consequence of the war on
terror and American involvement in the Middle East. Some of America’s
legislators apparently do not even understand that freedom of speech actually
means that one can say things that others might find distasteful. The assault
on freedom of speech has been accelerated through the invention of so-called
“hate speech,” which has in turn morphed into “hate crimes” where punishments
are increased if there is any suggestion that hatred of groups or individuals
is involved. Some have rightly questioned the whole concept, pointing out that
if you murder someone the result is the same whether you hate your victim or
not.
Freedom of speech is particularly
threatened in any situations having to do with Israel, a reflection of the
power of that country’s lobby in the United States. At a recent town hall
gathering, Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) demonstrated how he and his colleagues
run and hide whenever the issue of Israel is raised when he would not respond
directly to a question over whether any criticism of Israel should or should
not be protected under the First Amendment. Crenshaw is a Republican and
generally reliably conservative, though he recently spoke out against the “For
the People Act of 2019,” which he claimed “would limit free speech dramatically.”
A constituent specifically asked
Crenshaw’s opinion about federal laws that require citizens in some states to
sign a pledge that they will not boycott Israel if they wish to get government
contracts or obtain a government job. The audience member also mentioned a law
passed in Florida that bans anti-Semitism in public schools and universities,
defining “anti-Semitism” as criticism of Israel. The constituent observed,
“These laws are obviously flagrant and troubling violations of the First Amendment
to free speech.”
“Will you honor your oath and
denounce these laws here, now and forever?” Crenshaw was then asked. Crenshaw
quickly fired back that the critic was “cloaking yourself in the First
Amendment” to enable engaging in “vehement anti-Semitism.” Crenshaw then
asserted that the questioner was “advocating the BDS movement,” a recent target
of much of the legislation that the critic was addressing.
BDS refers to the Boycott,
Divestment, and Sanctions movement, which calls on people to protest Israel by
pulling investments from and boycotting the country.
Israel is engaged in what might be
described as a war with the objective of driving any and all criticism of the
Jewish state out of polite discourse, making it illegal wherever and whenever possible.
The Knesset has passed legislation criminalizing anyone who supports BDS and
has set up a semiclandestine group called Kella Shlomo to counteract its
message. The country’s education minister has called BDS supporters “enemy
soldiers” and has compared them to Nazis. Netanyahu has also backed up the new
law with a restriction on foreigners who support the BDS movement entering the
country, including American Jewish dissidents, several of whom have been turned
around at the airport and sent home.
Israel has been particularly
successful at promoting its own preferred narrative, together with sanctions
for those who do not concur, in the English language speaking world and also in
France, which has the largest Jewish population in Europe. The U.S. government
under Donald Trump is completely under the thumb of the Israeli prime
minister’s office, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently saying “our
major focus is stamping out anti-Semitism.”
Sanctions already in place in Europe
consist of fines and even jail time. The legal penalties come into play for
those criticizing Israel or questioning the accuracy of the accepted holocaust
narrative, i.e., disputing that “6 million died.” Even attacking specific
Israeli government policies, like its slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza every
Friday, can be found guilty of anti-Semitism, which is now considered a hate
crime in Britain, France, Germany, and, most recently, the Czech Republic. In
Britain, where the Jewish lobby is extremely strong, a law passed in December
2016 made the UK one of the first countries to use the definition of
anti-Semitism agreed upon earlier in the year at a conference of the
Berlin-based International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).
A statement from the British prime
minister’s office at that time explained that the intention of the new
definition was to “ensure that culprits will not be able to get away with being
anti-Semitic because the term is ill-defined, or because different
organizations or bodies have different interpretations of it.”
The British government’s own
definition relies on guidance provided by the IHRA, which asserts that it is
considered anti-Semitic to accuse Jews of being “more loyal to Israel or their
religion than to their own nations, or to say the existence of Israel is
intrinsically racist.” In other words, even if many Jews are more loyal to
Israel than to the countries they live in and even though Israel is in fact
intrinsically racist, it is now illegal to say so in Great Britain.
One should not be surprised, as the
British government’s subservience to Jewish and Israeli interests is nearly as
enthusiastic as is government in the United States, though it is driven by the
same sorts of things – Jewish money and Jewish power, particularly in the media.
A majority of Conservative Party members of parliament have joined Conservative
Friends of Israel, and the Labour counterpart is also a major force to be
reckoned with on the political left.
Here in the United States, the
friends of Israel appear to believe that anyone who is unwilling to do business
with Israel or even with the territories that it has illegally occupied should
not be allowed to obtain any benefit from federal, state or even local
governments. Constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and association for
every American are apparently not valid if one particular highly favored
foreign country is involved, as the discussion with Crenshaw reveals.
Twenty-seven states now have laws
sanctioning those who criticize or boycott Israel. And one particular pending
piece of federal legislation that is regularly re-introduced into the Senate
would far exceed what is happening at the state level and would set a new
standard for deference to Israeli interests on the part of the national government.
It would criminalize any U.S. citizen “engaged in interstate or foreign
commerce” who supports a boycott of Israel or who even goes about “requesting
the furnishing of information” regarding it, with penalties enforced through
amendments of two existing laws, the Export Administration Act of 1979 and the
Export-Import Act of 1945, that include potential fines of between $250,000 and
$1 million and up to 20 years in prison.
Israel, and its friends like
Crenshaw, are particularly fearful of the BDS movement because its non-violence
is attractive to college students, including many young Jews, who would not
otherwise get involved on the issue. The Israeli government clearly
understands, correctly, that BDS can do more damage than any number of terrorist
attacks, as it represents a serious critique of the behavior of the Jewish
state while also challenging the actual legitimacy of the Israeli government
and its colonizing activity in Palestine. Much of the current hate crime
legislation in places like Germany and the Czech Republic directly targets BDS,
stating specifically that it is “inherently” anti-Semitic. In late July, the
House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed its own resolution condemning
BDS explicitly in a 398-to-17 vote.
Going hand-in-hand with the
condemnation of BDS is a drive to maintain the exclusivity of Jewish suffering.
In June, when Rep. Alexandria Ocasio- Cortez (D-N.Y.) called border detention
centers holding asylum seekers “concentration camps,” she was inundated with
protests from Jewish groups that claimed she was denigrating the holocaust and
“insulting victims of genocide.” The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
even published a statement objecting to comparisons between “the holocaust and
other events.”
It is important for Americans to
realize that Israel not only spies on the U.S., digs its paws deep into our
Treasury, and perverts Washington’s Middle East policy, it is also attempting
to dictate what we the people can and cannot say. And Congress and much of the
media are fully on board, which is the real tragedy.
This article was originally
published on American free press, found via American Herald Tribune.
Tuesday, December 3, 2019
Churchill and the Jews
Most people know Winston Churchill as the “British Bulldog,” the Prime Minister who led Great Britain to victory in World War II. But a lesser-known story is one of Churchill, the lifelong friend of the Jewish people and one of the key players in the creation of the State of Israel.
Note: this is a Christian zionist
documentary, so it makes it seem like Churchill’s love for the jews is a great
thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)