The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Saturday, March 30, 2024
Wednesday, March 27, 2024
Jews and the Media – Part III
Part III
„We must prevent a criminal understanding between the Fascist aggressors and the British and French imperialist clique.“ (Statement issued by Dimitrov, General Secretary of the Komintern, The Pravda, November 7, 1938).
„As for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary Bolshevist movement is Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppressions of our deplorable Press.“ (G.K.’s Weekly, February 4, 1937, Hilaire Belloc)
„The reader may wonder why newspapers never mention that Bolshevism is simply a Jewish conquest of Russia. The explanation is that the international news agencies on which papers rely for foreign news are controlled by Jews. The Jew, Jagoda, is head of the G.P.U. (the former Cheka), now called ‘The People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs.’ The life, death or imprisonment of Russian citizens is in the hands of this Jew, and his spies are everywhere. According to the anti-Comintern bulletin (15/4/35) Jagoda’s organization between 1929 and 1934 drove between five and six million Russian peasants from their homes. (The Government of France now (July, 1936) has as Prime Minister, the Jewish Socialist, Leon Blum. According to the French journal Candide, M. Blum has substantial interests in Weiler’s Jupiter aero-engine works in France, and his son, Robert Blum, is manager of a branch Weiler works in Russia, making Jupiter aero-engines for the Russian Government).“ (All These Things, A.N. Field; The Rulers of Russia, Denis Fahey, p. 37)
„The two great British institutions represented by Eden and myself had never sent a representative to Soviet Russia until now...British statesmen had never gone to Moscow. My paper had never sent a correspondent to Moscow because of the Soviet censorship. Thus our two visits were both great events, each in its own sphere. The Soviet Government had repeatedly complained about Russian news being published from Riga and asked why a correspondent was not sent to Moscow to see for himself, and the answer was always Censorship. So my arrival was in the nature of a prospecting tour. Before I had been there five minutes the Soviet Government started quarrelling with me about the most trivial thing. For I wrote that Eden had passed through streets lined with ‘drab and silent crowds,’ I think that was the expression, and a little Jewish censor came along, and said these words must come out.
I asked him if he wanted me to write that the streets were filled with top-hatted bourgeoisie, but he was adamant. Such is the intellectual level of the censors. The censorship department, and that means the whole machine for controlling the home and muzzling the foreign Press, was entirely staffed by Jews, and this was a thing that puzzled me more than anything else in Moscow. There seemed not to be a single non-Jewish official in the whole outfit, and they were just the same Jews as you met in New York, Berlin, Vienna and Prague, well- manicured, well-fed, dressed with a touch of the dandy. I was told the proportion of Jews in the Government was small, but in this one department that I got to know intimately they seemed to have a monopoly, and I asked myself, where were the Russians? The answer seemed to be that they were in the drab, silent crowds which I had seen but which must not be heard of...I broke away for an hour or two from Central Moscow and the beaten tourist tracks and went looking for the real Moscow. I found it. Streets long out of repair, tumbledown houses, ill-clad people with expressionless faces. The price of this stupendous revolution; in material things they were even poorer than before. A market where things were bought and sold, that in prosperous bourgeois countries you would have hardly bothered to throw away; dirty chunks of some fatty, grey-white substance that I could not identify, but which was apparently held to be edible, half a pair of old boots, a few cheap ties and braces...
And then, looking further afield, I saw the universal sign of the terrorist State, whether its name be Germany, Russia, or what-not. Barbed wired palisades, corner towers with machine guns and sentries. Within, nameless men, lost to the world, imprisoned without trial by the secret police. The concentration camps, the political prisoners in Germany, the concentration camps held tens of thousands, in this country, hundreds of thousands...
The next thing...I was sitting in the Moscow State Opera. Eden, very Balliol and very well groomed, was in the ex-Imperial box. The band played ‘God save the King,’ and the house was packed full with men and women, boys and girls, whom, judged by western standards, I put down as members of the proletariat, but no, I was told, the proletariat isn’t so lucky, these were the members of the privileged class which the Proletarian State is throwing up, higher officials, engineers and experts.“ (Insanity Fair, Douglas Reed, pp. 194-195; 199-200; The Rulers of Russia, Denis Fahey, pp. 38-40)
„We have only to look around us in the world today, to see everywhere the same disintegrating power at work, in art, literature, the drama, the daily Press, in every sphere that can influence the mind of the public...our modern cinemas perpetually endeavor to stir up class hatred by scenes and phrases showing ‘the injustice of Kings,’ ‘the sufferings of the people,’ ‘the Selfishness of Aristocrats,’ regardless of whether these enter into the theme of the narrative or not. And in the realms of literature, not merely in works of fiction but in manuals for schools, in histories and books professing to be of serious educative value and receiving a skillfully organized boom throughout the press, everything is done to weaken patriotism, to shake belief in all existing institutions by the systematic perversion of both contemporary and historical facts. I do not believe that all this is accidental; I do not believe that he public asks for the anti-patriotic to demoralizing books and plays placed before it; on the contrary it invariably responds to an appeal to patriotism and simple healthy emotions. The heart of the people is still sound, but ceaseless efforts are made to corrupt it.“ (N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 342; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 180-181)
1976: Jewish owned movie studios in Hollywood produce two anti-Christian movies. „THE PASSOVER PLOT“ which portrays Christ as a revolutionary who uses drugs to trick people into thinking he was crucified. „THE SEX LIFE OF JESUS,“ Christ is portrayed in a series of sexual encounters including homosexual [Think about it -- time after time the Jews make movies portraying our Lord Jesus Christ as a Queer. How can ANY thinking Christian possibly believe these are God’s People HOW STUPID CAN CHRISTIANS BE?] „ACTS THE MANY FACES OF JESUS“ is built around the same theme. [Other movies made since 1976 with that same theme, that Jesus Christ was a drug addict and Queer are „JESUS CHRIST SUPERSTAR,“ „LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST,“ „HEAVEN ON EARTH -- this one was not about Christ but about a fallen woman angel,“ „OH GOD-1“ and „OH GOD-2“ -- while these did not portray Jesus as a Queer they did portray Almighty God as a stupid mortal man -- and these are only a few of the many] (Tribune Review, November 16, 1976).
Where the hell are our so-called Christian Ministers? That’s right in their pulpits, on television and radio crying out for more money and letting these antichrist perverts go on blaspheming Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ, while they suck up after these Satanic creeps!
This cannot be accomplished without the use of other peoples publications.. It is impossible for us to agree with every view expressed in these works.. some of which are quite Inflammatory And even downright HATEFUL. I believe it important when presenting this material.. to leave it intact without Alteration. In this case however I am rewriting the Introduction... the old one seemed a bit Reactive and Racist. Kinda hard to avoid sometimes. But Racism is not a good defense against Racism...
HILAIRE BELLOC, renown historian in G. K.’s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937: „The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press.“
HENRY FORD in The Dearborn Independent, 12-19 February 1921: „Jews have always controlled the business... The motion picture influence of the United States and Canada...is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind.“
LINDBERGH, CHARLES. 20th century American aviator, writer. Wednesday, August 23, 1939: „We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence in our press, radio and motion pictures. It may become very serious. [Fulton] Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual system if a certain feature were permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed.“
Thursday, May 1, 1941: „The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have ‘the bit in its teeth’ and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are the ‘intellectuals’ and the ‘Anglophiles,’ and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others.“ (The Wartime Journals)
ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader of the 1930s: „Through their (Jew’s) international news agencies, they mold your minds and have you see the world not as it is, but as they want you to see it. Through their cinema, they are the educators of our youth - and with just one film in two hours, can wipe out of a child’s brain what he has learned in six months in the home, the church or the school.“
SPRING-RICE, SIR CECIL. 20th century British politician: „One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America. (Letter of November 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, foreign secretary. Letters and Friendships)
CAPOTE, TRUMAN. 20th century American writer. In an interview, he assailed „the Zionist mafia“ monopolizing publishing today, and protested a tendency to suppress things that do not meet with Jewish approval. (Playboy magazine, March 1968)
Sunday, March 24, 2024
Jews in the USA
Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jews-in-the-usa/
England is ruled by jewry; the same is true for the USA; the English-North American world conquest plans serve judah’s goal of subjecting all Aryan peoples to exploitation, racial corruption, and gradual destruction.
Background: One of the naturally recurring National Socialist anti-semitic campaigns began in May 1943. Goebbels introduced it with a lead article in Das Reich titled “The War and the Jews.” Soon after, this remarkable document appeared. The Deutscher Wochendienst was a weekly publication aimed at magazine editors, providing more in-depth treatment than the Zeitschriften-Dienst (also intended for magazine editors). Both came from the same office.
The source: Deutscher Wochendienst, 21 May 1943
JEWS IN THE USA
Supporting material:
Historical:
The mass migration of jews from England to the USA began in the middle of the nineteenth century. – jews in the USA (either in jewish districts [ghettos] and living among gentiles of other races; outside the ghetto, he often does not belong to a religious organization, mostly concealing himself). – From the beginning, the jews held together, to their advantage and to the disadvantage of Gentile USA citizens, working together in faith, morals, outlook, business, commerce, and industry in ways serving their jewish goals. They often conceal their efforts as “humanitarian,” appealing to the human feelings of Gentiles as they undertook their harmful, expletive, and destructive campaigns.– jews also succeeded in exploiting workers in the USA, along with peasants, farmers, craftsmen, and richer gentiles. – The jew also used Freemasonry in the USA to influence and train a number of gentiles – mostly those in important positions – turning them into his submissive tools. – The influence of the jews grows from year to year in the USA.
The jews as warmongers:
Especially in the USA, the jews have twice been warmongers against Germany. – When England faced the loss of the war in 1916, its government worked to draw the USA into the war, but received a negative answer; the jews in England (Dr. Chaim Weizmann, Solokov, Chief Rabbi Dr. Hertz, the Rothschilds, etc.) joined together and won over the Jesuit-trained Lieutenant Colonel Mark Sykes for the great Zionist plan: drawing the USA into the war. – President Wilson followed the demands of American Zionist Leader Brandeis (justice of the Supreme Court with a secret telephone line to the White House) and joined the side of judah, the warmongers. – The jews in England and especially in the USA used all their strength to get the USA to enter the war against Germany, and as a reward from the British government demanded Palestine for their pan-jewish purposes – The jews in the USA won on 6 April 1917: the government declared war on Germany. – The comment by former New York mayor Hylan regarding the forced entrance of the USA into the war against Germany is significant: “Wall Street (judah) is the breeding round for political and financial schemes and intrigues that have the goal of bringing everything under its control. Wall Street appoints party leaders, determines candidates for public offices, and ruthlessly uses the army and navy of the USA for its own purposes.”
The second warmongering campaign by USA jews against Germany: In 1936 Churchill told USA General Wood: “Germany is becoming too strong; we (that is, England and the USA) must destroy it!” After that, the half-jew Bullitt (owner of huge numbers of shares in armaments concerns) was named USA ambassador in Paris. – In 1937 he used Freemasonry to incite the obedient jewish-influenced Roosevelt (in whose veins jewish blood flows) to publicly attack Germany. – By 1937 the President of the USA already had the right “to determine if and when there was to be war between two countries.” – Bullitt “persuaded” the Polish ambassador in Paris to reject every German proposal. – In 1938 the French magazine Je suis partout wrote: Roosevelt has understood that war is the only means that will enable his small Hebraic brain trust to take revenge and reconquer central Europe. It would naturally not be a war in which the United States would take the initiative, no, rather a war that British sailors and French soldiers would wage for the Chosen People. The main goal is to make the peoples obedient and lead them with fine words to the slaughterhouse!” – Since 1938, the jewish press used radio and film advertising to flood the USA with warmongering favoring the goals of the jews: publicly it was for democracy, humanity, world peace, and so on, but actually it was aimed at Germany’s destruction since it was exposing the jews, and beyond that to gain enormous war profits, to weaken or destroy all Gentile peoples, and ultimately to establish a jewish dictatorship over the entire world.
The jews and the President of the USA:
Roosevelt’s ancestor Johanna Samuels was apparently of jewish descent: a demonstrable infiltration of jewish blood into the Roosevelt family occurred in the second generation with Nicholas Roosevelt, born in Esopus in 1685; in the seventh generation the mother of the current president, Sarah Delano (“Delano” is Roosevelt’s middle name) of jewish descent. – The president received a “medal” from the American Hebrew, the highest honor “American” jewry can bestow: Roosevelt is especially proud of that jewish recognition. – Roosevelt is a Freemason (member of Holland Lodge Nr. 8 in New York and honorary member of “Architect’s Lodge 519” and member of the “Great Lodge of Georgia”; he holds the 32nd degree (the highest degree is 33): all of the president’s three sons are also high level Freemasons.
The president won reelection by promising absolutely to keep the USA out of European conflicts; immediately after the election he let the mask fall and incited war against Germany.
Roosevelt’s friends and advisors:
The chief advisor of the President of the USA is the jew Bernard M. Baruch, who carried through the declaration of war against Germany in 1917 and later promoted the Dawes Plan, in order to make German workers the slaves of international jewish-plutocratic high finance. – In 1937 Baruch offered to pay for filling gaps in USA military supplies out of his own pocket ($3.3 million); the offer was not accepted, but the proposal was approved and Baruch could do enormous business. – Before the outbreak of war, Baruch consulted regularly with Churchill and Eden. – The jewish Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau is related by marriage to the governor of New York, Herbert Lehmann, who is an Orthodox jew. – The half-jew Laguardia is a well known enemy of Germany. – The jew Professor Felix Frankfurter (born in Vienna), judge of the Supreme Court of the USA, whose main activity is sneaking his particularly suitable jewish pupils into high positions in the States, particularly places near the president. – One of the jews that Frankfurter advanced is Benjamin Cohen, who is in the “White House” and occupies himself primarily with “lawmaking.” – The jew Samuel Rosenmann [sic] of the New York Supreme Court is also the president’s personal attorney. – Secretary of State Hull (married to a jew): Hull’s chief aide is the jew Leo Pavolski; most members of the State Department are jews; the president of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives, Bloom, is a jew.
Organization of jewry in the USA:
1. The “American Jewish Committee” and the “Kehillah” (the activity of the latter is secret; it has great influence on American life; it is almost unknown to gentiles. Both groups were established as a protest against the factual conclusion by the police commissioner of New York General Bingham, according to which 50% of all crimes in New York were committed by jews [1906]: Bingham also provided revelations about jewish pimps, and was fired; the “Kehillah” is the largest and most powerful jewish association in the world; jewish capitalists, Bolshevists, rabbis, union leaders, etc., all belong to the “Kehillah” and each helps the other).
2. “American Jewish Congress”: and
3. “American Labour Committee” (huge jewish association). These three organizations are a parallel government for the USA that has all power in its hands. – The publicly announced goal of the three associations: Aid for Palestine and support for needy jews; the real goal is to make the USA into a jewish state, a step on the way to the final goal of a world jewish dictatorship.
4. “Zionist Organization of America ” (ZOA): Official goal: Building a jewish state in Palestine along the lines of Th. Herzl; 80,000 members in the USA; including affiliated organizations 250,000 members; President: Salomon Goldmann.
5. “Union of American Hebrew Congregations” over 2,000,000 members.
6. “Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations”: 400,000 members.
7. “Anti-Nazi League”, New York; promotes agitation against Germany; carried out the whole boycott effort against Germany; LaGuardia is a member; the organization destroyed several hundred thousand bales of cotton to implement the boycott against Germany: 5,000,000 members, including affiliated organizations.
8. Women’s organization “Hadassah”: 60,000 members in the USA; affiliated with the “World Organization of Zionist Women” (Wizo).
9. “National Conference of Christians and Jews”: Based in New York; effort to establish jewish world domination; unites about 250 other Christian-Jewish organizations.
There are also others organizations, some Christian, that support the goal of a Zionist state. – Jewish leadership of Freemasonic lodges in the USA.
Themes and Suggestions:
Culture:
The young American style that modeled itself politically after England was subverted by the jews in the USA; Aeschylus, Euripides, Irish ballads and popular music, Shakespeare disappeared; The jews Jake, Lee, Skubert [sic], Ziegfield, Harries produced jewish-Oriental plays (Mecca, The Garden of Allah [nude dancing], leading to the “Shimmy”).– The jew introduced “Nigger songs” everywhere, promoted “writers” like the author of “Yes, We Have No Bananas”; he founded magazines to promote “sex appeal”, demoralized the American population through corresponding books, films (film king jew Laemmle), revues, etc. – The jews have understood how to give all forms of art a tone: jewish “artists” led the gentile people to moral and spiritual decline.
Commerce:
From the start of its emigration, jewry in the USA went into commerce, business, and finance, avoiding any form of physical, value-creating labor and rapidly gained almost unlimited influence on domestic and foreign commerce.
Industry:
Since the beginning of his industrial activity, the jew in the USA has produced worthless things lacking quality, workmanship, endurance, and taste. – The jew despises craftsmanship and is only interested in producing as much as possible from his raw materials, while keeping pay at the lowest level, bribing jewish union leaders, encouraging strikes against competitors, etc.
Agriculture:
The agricultural population of the USA is about 30,000,000, among whom are almost no jews (according to the American Jewish Yearbook only 130,000 of the 4.85 million jews in the USA live in small towns, villages, or on farms). – In the countryside, the jew is known only as a traveling salesman, peddler, or as an dealer in poultry, fruits, and vegetables; his business methods have everywhere earned him the title of “crook.”
Mining:
There is hardly a jew in the USA working underground in mining. – In mining districts, the jew is found only as a trader or deal maker. – If a new supply of metal, oil, and so on is discovered in the USA, a mass of jews immediately shows up and take over trade in the district.
Transportation:
The jew in the USA is particularly active in transportation as owner of moving companies, etc.; now and again also as a taxi owner in profitable cities. – The jew is never a railroad worker, professional driver, etc.
Forestry:
The jew in the USA is unknown in forestry; however, if a settlement develops he appears as a merchant. The rape of North American forests is a dark chapter in the history of jewish exploitation of the country’s natural treasures.
Construction:
The jew shows up only occasionally and temporarily as a worker, since he shies away from physical labor. – The jew in the USA as building contractor saw his jobs only as an opportunity for exploitation; he built tasteless buildings since he lacks any architectural sense. – The jew Strauss was appointed head of the administrative department in charge of housing.
Legal system:
The danger of jewish shysters and their treasonous cunning is known in the USA. – A “well-known” jewish lawyer is mistrusted by gentile Americans (frequent deposit swindles, etc.). – jewish attorneys represent on a “contingency” basis, including those whose injuries are the result of fraud. – Plots in divorce cases, bribery of witnesses, perjury, etc., are only “little” crimes of jewish attorneys in New York. The gentile citizen of New York knows that he will not receive justice in financial matters from a jewish attorney. – Gentiles have a chance of success only in, for example, cases involving debts on the other side of the river, where Mayor Hague excluded the jews. – The jews sit on the Supreme Court and maintain close relations with their racial comrades in all subordinate offices.
Financial system:
Since the collapse of the fraudulent jewish “Bank of the United States” (over 50 branches in the city of New York alone), the public has had great mistrust toward jewish banks (further example of fraudulent jewish banks: “Strauss Banking Comp., Sam. Insull). – Later the jews used treacherous stock maneuvers to retake control of the banking system. – The behavior of jewish loan companies in the USA (in each city) made government intervention necessary. – Countless cases in which jews made loans with interest that totaled 2-3 times the amount loaned. – On the mortgage market, the jews in the USA demanded discounts that were “nothing but a way of getting around the usury law.” – jewish firms involved in real estate can be called fraudulent enterprises almost without exception (Example Florida: during the height of the property boom the jewish Binder brothers sold property that was under water).
Medicine:
The jew here is primarily a bungler, abortionist, dealer in patent medicines that bring very high profits.
Labor movement:
The “little” jew in the USA is always an enemy of the state; the rich jew is an exploiter “from above,” who works with the relevant labor leader, who is usually a jew as well, and increases social misery to a degree that must appear incomprehensible especially to the German who thinks about the rich natural resources with which the USA is blessed.
Crime:
New York (Nearly 3 million of its 11 million inhabitants are jews) has the highest crime rate in the USA. – The first large criminal gang in the city (1825) was founded in the business of the jew Rosanna Peers (Perles); that was also the headquarters of “Captain” Coellmann (jew); the leader was the jew “Bowery-Moses,” his successor was Samson (jew). – The second big criminal gang met in the grain dealership of the jew Elias Hart; its leader was Judson (jew). – The leader of the notorious “River Pirates” was the jew Saul. – The worst criminal in the city in the middle of the 19th century was the jew “Italian David.” – The center of crooked gambling in New York was the gambling hell of the jew Sam Suydam, whose best customers were the jew John Jacob Astor and the later U.S. Marshall Captain Isaiah Rynders (jew). – The later owners of the countless gambling hells were almost without exception jews. – In 1888 the jews began the first organization of pimps and prostitution, which soon spread to the whole country. – The widespread fencing system was introduced in the USA by the jew Joe Erich and built up through a large number of his racial comrades. – The jewess Mandelbaum taught courses in bank robbery and extortion. – For a long time bank robbers were mostly jews (Red Lyons, Bill Mosher, Shinburn, etc.). – The king of burglars in the USA was the jew J. D. Gradys. – Among the worst gangster leaders in the USA were, among others, the jews Danny Lyons, “Bucklige Jackson (Jakobsohn), Ignaz Lupo, and Monk Eastman (Edward Ostermann), who headed the organizations for drugs, pick pocketing, burglary, and prostitution. – The rate of serious crimes has climbed rapidly since 1900 (crime statistics for New York and the whole of the USA show that the jewish percentage of crime was the greatest, and increased from year to year). – jews as Public Enemy #1 (1938 the jew Jacob Gurrah Schapiro; then the jew Lepke). – New York is typical of the whole United States.
Current position of the jews in the USA:
The jews in the USA have power in their hands, suck the people dry and enslave them; they have greatly increased the national debt, corrupted and undermined everything; they have power in a few hands of jews or jewish lackeys; they have encouraged the worst conditions as well opposition to the law, produced a wave of crime and violence; they have waged war (boycotts. etc.) against everything social (also the social state). – They have introduced the absolute rule of gold (money), and they have brought farmers into great debt, and in part completely destroyed them. The jews in the USA treated gentiles just as prescribed for the jews in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Population policy:
There are 4.85 million jews in the USA, about 3.7% of the population. – jewish immigration in the USA is encouraged by the “Hebrew Immigrant Society” in New York which on request helps any jew outside the USA to immigrate, even when it is not permissible under immigration regulations; the society “cares for” the jews, securing all necessary papers, documents, and money, and provides all necessary advice. – Cities are the centers for jews in the USA (jewish percentage of the population is about 3.7%, in New York state 17%, in New York City 25%, two-thirds of all jews in the USA live in seven industrial cities on the East Coast, while in the agriculturally-oriented states of the union the percentage of jews in the population is well under 1%).
Friday, March 22, 2024
Wednesday, March 20, 2024
Behind Liberalism
If this video is not available in your country use TOR Browser to watch it – fight the jewish censorship!
by Dr. William Luther Pierce
When anyone wants to eliminate a problem or overcome an obstacle, it’s usually a big help to him to understand the nature of the problem or the obstacle. If he misunderstands the nature of the problem and bases his attempt to eliminate it on that misunderstanding, he’s far more likely to fail than if he tackles the problem with a thorough understanding of its nature. That’s self- evident, and probably my worst enemies would agree with me on that. And yet there are some very important problems that are frustrating us in our efforts to solve them simply because most of us have made no serious effort to understand their true nature. We have just assumed that the nature of the problems is self-evident when in fact it is not.
The most important example of this is the assumption that the reason our civilization is self- destructing is so-called „liberal“ social and political policies. There is a general belief that we have a preponderance of liberals in our government, in the media, among school administrators, among Christian preachers, and so on, and that most of the White public goes along with the destructive policies of these leading liberals because most members of the public also are liberals.
And I’m using the word „liberal“ to designate a person who has a particular set of beliefs, much in the way a Christian has a particular set of beliefs. That is, a Christian believes, among other things, that a man named Jesus of Nazareth, born approximately 2,000 years ago in Palestine, was the son of God; that he walked on water, resurrected the dead, and performed other miracles; and that after he was crucified at the demand of the Jews he rose from the dead and ascended into heaven. And a liberal believes, among other things, that all featherless bipeds are „equal“ - that is, that they all are born with the same potential and would be equal in their accomplishments if they all had the same advantages and opportunities.
And as I said, there is a very common assumption made that the ongoing destruction of our society and our civilization is the consequence of applying the fallacious belief system of the liberals to the formulation of public policy. But this very common assumption is incorrect - or perhaps it would be better to say that it misses the point. Liberal policies certainly are destructive, but they aren’t the ultimate driving force behind the assault on Western civilization and our race. And so any attempt to restore our society to health and save our civilization from ruin based on an effort to change the beliefs of liberals - to convince liberals of the incorrectness of their ideas - is likely to fail. It is likely to fail because the problem is only superficially, but not fundamentally, the consequence of a group of people - namely, liberals - basing their policies on a particular set of incorrect ideas, such as the innate equality of all featherless bipeds. The problem is not one of belief, but one of psychology, of human nature, and of the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by hidden agents.
I am sure that there are real liberals: that is, people who have thought about the world around them and then consciously adopted the liberal ideology. They constitute a fraction of a percent of the people who adhere to liberal policies and pay lip service to liberal ideas. The rest - that is, nearly all so-called „liberals“ - are liberals for the same reason that Catholics are Catholics and Lutherans are Lutherans and Buddhists are Buddhists. It has nothing to do with the ideologies of the various religions and everything to do with psychology. With a few rare exceptions, a Catholic is not a Catholic because he has thought about the world around him and decided that Catholicism is what makes the most sense. He is a Catholic because his parents and his neighbors are Catholics. He is a Catholic - or a Lutheran or a Buddhist - because he is a lemming, and lemmings don’t make up their own minds about anything. They believe - really believe - whatever they think the people around them believe.
With liberals today it’s not so much a matter of believing what one’s parents or neighbors believe as it is believing what one perceives to be fashionable in one’s peer group, and the perception most often comes from one’s television screen. It is possible to persuade an occasional liberal that his view of the world is incorrect and his policies are destructive and he should straighten out his thinking, just as it is possible to persuade an occasional Lutheran that Martin Luther really was the Antichrist and that Lutherans should beg the Pope for forgiveness and return to Holy Mother Church. It’s a hard sell in either case. And as I said, it misses the point.
The point is this: Liberals are tools. Most of them are not inherently evil or destructive, any more than a hammer used to smash a statue by Phidias is evil or a match used to burn a great library is evil. Liberals are morally neutral, like the hammer and the match. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. The evil is in the mind that plans the destruction and then uses the liberals to carry it out. And that force is the force that controls our mass media of news and entertainment. That mind is the mind that formulates the slant of the news and the content of the media entertainment; the mind that determines which news will be reported and how it will be reported, and which news will be suppressed; the mind that determines which trends will be made fashionable and which ideas will be deemed Politically Correct.
And it is that force, that mind, that malevolent spirit that we must counter: that we must be aware of in making our plan to restore our society to health and halt the ruin of our civilization. When I said a moment ago that our problem is not one of belief but one of psychology, of human nature, I meant that we should not focus our efforts on trying to change the beliefs of the liberals but rather on exposing and then destroying the malevolent entity that manipulates the liberals by exploiting their psychological compulsion to conform to perceived norms.
That’s a fact, but as I said at the beginning, most people who are interested in eliminating the problem fail to see it that way. They still want to fight the liberals rather than the hidden force behind the liberals. What I’ll do now is try to persuade you that my understanding of the nature of the problem is correct by providing a few examples or illustrations of the way in which the problem manifests itself.
We might note first the global nature of the problem, the global way in which it is being orchestrated. Almost everywhere one looks in the White world, one sees the same destructive forces at work, the same governmental policies, the same wrongheaded attitudes and fashions being promoted by the media. There are, of course, local differences of detail. The United States had a large population of Black slaves until 136 years ago, and no country in Europe has that sort of history. One would expect this difference to have a strong effect on racial attitudes and policies, but in fact the policies of governments throughout Europe and the party line promoted by the mass media of news and entertainment throughout Europe are in broad outline the same as those in the United States.
The denial of racial differences and the doctrinaire promotion of egalitarianism are as much policies of the mass media and the government in Germany, in France, and in the United Kingdom, for example, as in the United States. Most European countries have no common border with a non-White country, as the United States does, and yet one sees the same insanely destructive policy regarding non-White immigration nearly everywhere in Europe that one sees in the United States. Nowhere is non-White immigration popular, and yet every government pursues a policy of bringing non-White immigrants into the country and then favoring and protecting them after they are in. One sees the same sort of corruption of the society by Turks, by Arabs, by Blacks, by Pakistanis, by Vietnamese, by Chinese, or by other non-Whites in the big cities of Sweden or Denmark or England as in the United States. The majority of the Whites everywhere are against it, while their supposedly democratic governments and the media are for it.
A good example of this is what’s been happening in northern England recently, where Asian gangs have been attacking and terrorizing Whites, and the government and the media have been trying to blame it on „White racists,“ such as members of the British National Party, the BNP. In fact the dynamics of the current racial rioting in the Manchester, England, area and in nearby Leeds is remarkably similar to the racial conflicts we’ve seen in places like Seattle and Cincinnati recently in this country. In Seattle and Cincinnati, Blacks were attacking Whites - specifically targeting Whites, especially young, White women, for vicious beatings fueled by racial hatred - while the media tried hard to persuade the public that race had nothing to do with the attacks, and the politicians were making promises of more handouts to the Blacks and looking for Whites to arrest in connection with the rioting so that they could not be accused of „racial profiling“ because they arrested more Blacks than Whites. In the Manchester suburb of Oldham, with a population of nearly a quarter of a million-15 percent of which consists of Asian immigrants brought in by the British government against the will of the British people since the Second World War-gangs of Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, and Indians have been attacking Whites, while the media and the politicians have been trying to blame it on Whites, who supposedly provoked the Asians. Change the names of the cities, and the news stories in England about the Oldham race war or the race riot just three days ago in Leeds could have been written in this country about the riots in Seattle and Cincinnati.
I’ll read to you excerpts from a couple of news reports that came from Oldham during the last two weeks. An Associated Press International story from Sunday, May 27, reported:
At the height of the clashes - which continued off and on for seven hours, into the early hours of Sunday - up to 500 youths fought pitched battles with police in full riot gear. The fighting left the main thoroughfare in the town’s Glodwick district littered with broken bricks, shards of glass, and the hulks of several burned-out cars.
Paul Barrow, proprietor of a pub that was trashed in the fighting, said rioters burst in and began beating his patrons. „The first of them got through the door and attacked the customers with whatever they could get their hands on - bottles, stools, and glasses,“ he said.
Did you hear anything about that? I’m sure that you would have heard plenty and would still be hearing about it if 500 Whites had been the ones rioting and beating up Asians. And do you know how the rioting started? The same Associated Press International story says:
The riot apparently was sparked when a gang of white youths attacked a home in a neighborhood where most residents are of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or Indian origin, police said. Soon after, a group of about 100 youths from the neighborhood attacked a pub mainly patronized by whites.
Actually, gangs of Asians have been attacking Whites in Oldham for months. Most of these attacks have been ignored by the media, although an especially vicious incident earlier this year did make national headlines. In that incident Asians nearly killed a 76-year-old White man, Walter Chamberlain, when they smashed his face with bricks while screaming anti-White insults at him.
I’ll read you another news report, this one from the May 30 issue of London’s The Times:
White families barricaded the windows of their homes with planks of wood last night as residents in the Oldham riot zone retreated behind ethnic lines....
Earlier Jack Straw, the home secretary, tried to blame racial conflict in the town on intervention by the British National Party, but angry local white people told a different story. After Chief Superintendent Eric Hewitt said on television that all but a few of the 20 people arrested overnight were white, The Times sought the views of the town’s shrinking white community.
People described themselves as being under siege. Neighbors told of sending children to stay with families in Manchester and Ashton-under-Lyne so that they were not injured by bricks flying through windows or kept awake at night by police helicopters....
Mr. Straw told the Oldham Evening Chronicle yesterday: „It is plain beyond doubt that relations between different sections of the community can only be poisoned by the intervention of extremists like the BNP. I utterly deplore their attempts to exploit the situation in the town.“
Straw’s comments about the BNP are nearly identical to those of the local media and government people in York, Pennsylvania, about me and the National Alliance when some of our material was distributed in York recently. I told you about that in my broadcast two weeks ago. If one isn’t aware of the underlying forces involved, that sort of global unanimity might be surprising.
By the way, Jack Straw, the United Kingdom’s minister of home affairs, who among other things is in charge of the country’s police agencies, is a Jew. So was his predecessor as home secretary, Michael Howard. I have no idea how he managed to appropriate a good English name like „Howard,“ but while he was in office Howard banned me from the United Kingdom. He told me that if I ever attempted to enter that country again I would be arrested. The reason for my banning, he said, is that I might cause a breach of the public order. I told him that I had never in my life caused a breach of the public order anywhere. But the banning still stands. A Jew is able to tell me that I cannot visit the land of my ancestors, and his order is enforced by English policemen!
What do you think is the likelihood that the present Jewish home secretary, Jack Straw, will ban any of the Pakistanis or other Asians who smashed in Walter Chamberlain’s head with bricks? Well of course, you know that there’s no chance at all of that because the same unwritten rules apply in Britain that apply here. An attack on a White by a non-White is not regarded as a breach of the public order. It’s only when a White defends himself against non-Whites that the media begin yapping about „hate crimes,“ and the government politicians spring into action.
And it’s not just Britain and the United States. The same controlling force is at work in Germany, in Scandinavia, in France, in Canada, in Australia, and everywhere else in the White world. From Switzerland to Sweden it is against the law to question the Jews’ claims about how many of them died during the Second World War in the so-called „Holocaust“ or how they died. In Switzerland people are in prison now for saying, „I’m not convinced that six million Jews were killed in gas chambers by the Germans. I think that fewer than six million Jews died during the war, and most of them died from disease in the concentration camps, rather than from poison gas.“ Say that over here, and the media will denounce you hysterically as a „Holocaust denier.“ Say it in Canada or Australia or Switzerland or almost any other country in Europe, and the government will lock you up.
It is not just an amazing coincidence that we have this global similarity in conditions at this instant in time. What we can see is the same organized campaigns, the same well-oiled legislative and social programs, the same hidden forces behind these campaigns in every country. As I said, there are differences in detail, but the same evil minds, the same schemers are at work globally. Take any program, any campaign - the current campaign by Jewish groups to have more „speech crime“ legislation enacted in the United States, for example - and if you want to see where it is headed, look at any other White country where the same program has met a little less resistance and been able to gain more ground. Where the campaign has gone in one country is where it is headed in every country, because the same malevolent force is behind it.
I’ll give you another indication that it’s not soft, weepy liberal sentiment that’s wrecking our society today, but rather a cold, hard, cunning, evil force behind the liberalism, using the liberalism to push a hidden agenda. It’s not some soggy, mushy idea that everything that somehow qualifies as „human“ is equal that is the driving force behind the ruin of our civilization, but rather it is a strongly cohesive group of people that consider themselves superior to everyone not in their ethnic/racial/religious group and only use egalitarianism as a wrecking tool against our society. My organization, the National Alliance, has for several years been publishing information on the racial differences in the incidence of HIV infection in the United States. One of our leaflets, which we have distributed widely on university campuses, points out that heterosexual Black males are 14 times as likely as heterosexual White males to be carriers of the AIDS-causing virus. We’ve also pointed out that while AIDS among Whites is largely a disease of homosexuals, among Blacks it’s largely a heterosexual disease. Well, when we point out this startling difference between Black and White HIV infection rates for heterosexual males, with Blacks 14 times as likely to be infected, liberals don’t want to believe it. They don’t want to believe it because it is contrary to their primary belief in equality, in the essential sameness of Blacks and Whites.
But of course, the people behind the scenes - the schemers - are concerned with facts, with reality, not with nutty notions of equality. The sophomore college girls can squeal in disbelief when we present our information about racial disparities in the spread of AIDS and can denounce us as „haters,“ but the AIDS professionals, the experts, understand the truth of the matter. I have in front of me, on my desk at this moment, a poster - a large, colorful poster - published by the Florida Department of Health, intended for distribution in Black neighborhoods. It says, in large black and red letters „1 in 50 Blacks in Florida has HIV.“ And it gives an 800 number for Blacks to call for free HIV testing.
So why aren’t the White college girls in Florida told that two percent of Blacks are HIV infected? The government is telling the Blacks this but hoping that Whites won’t find out. Why is that? Could it be that the people behind the scenes don’t want White college girls to be wary of having sex with Blacks? Could it be that they want White college girls to become infected with HIV?
I believe that’s exactly what they want. I believe that the people behind the scenes want the destruction of our people by any means, including racial mixing with Blacks. That’s why the experts, the people who know the facts about AIDS, are afraid to speak up and tell the college girls that the National Alliance is correct. They are afraid of bucking the Jews behind the scenes. I have seen this fear manifested over and over again, and it is another evidence of the powerful forces that simply use liberalism as a destructive tool against our people.
Sunday, March 17, 2024
Politics of Slave Labor
The Fate of the Jews Deported from Hungary and the Lodz Ghetto in 1944
Source: https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/politics-of-slave-labor/
by Carlo Mattogno
DOWNLOAD THE BOOK IN PDF AND EPUB FORMAT.
The deportation of more than 400,000 Jews from Hungary to the Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp from mid-May to early July 1944 is said to have been the pinnacle of this camp’s extermination frenzy. It was allegedly followed in August 1944 by the extermination of more than 70,000 Jews deported from the Łódź Ghetto.
For the present book, the author has gathered from vast archival resources all the evidence available on both events. In painstaking research, the author proves almost on a person-by-person level what the fate was of many of the Jews deported from Hungary or the Łódź Ghetto.
In the case of the Jews deported from Hungary, it can be demonstrated that those among them who were deemed fit for forced-labor deployment – some 30% of all deported Jews – were indeed sent to forced-labor assignments throughout territories still under German control at that point in time. For the Łódź Ghetto, available documentation shows that almost all of these Jews were merely relocated, together with their production equipment. The challenge was to move them out of harm’s way of the invading Red Army.
Little documental or reliable anecdotal evidence exists about the fate of those Jews deported from Hungary who were classified as unfit for labor. This concerned mainly children together with their primary caregivers (usually their mothers) as well as the elderly and frail. Testimonies of third-party observers mainly from inside the Auschwitz Camp indicate that these Jews were slaughtered in the alleged homicidal gas chambers.
The claimed magnitude of this slaughter, with ten thousand and more victims every day, is said to have exceeded the Auschwitz crematoria’s capacity. Therefore, the majority of these victims were presumably burned on huge outdoor pyres. However, air photos taken by several reconnaissance missions of Allied air forces refute these claims, showing an entirely peaceful Auschwitz Camp during that time span. Hence, the available evidence points at brutal politics of slave labor rather than mass-murderous genocide.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)