The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Tuesday, July 30, 2024
Saturday, July 27, 2024
The Jewish Religion – Part I
Part I
„The Jews have always been with Jehovah, and all that Jehovah has belongs to the Jews.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 177)
„Only Judaism is a historic and moral religion: all other religions are neither historic nor moral.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 131).
„There never was a time when any Jew believed that Jehovah spoke to Moses or to the Prophets in any other sense than we believe today that God - that is, existence - reveals himself through the minds of a Spinoza, a Hegel, a Marx, an Einstein and the like.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 217)
„We belong to the One mastering God: you belong to the republic of playful gods.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 36).
„A Jew, by the fact that he belongs to the chosen people and is circumcised, possesses so great a dignity that no one, not even an angel, can share equality with him. In fact, he is considered almost the equal of God.“ (Pranaitis, I.B., The Talmud Unmasked, Imperial Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1892, p. 60).
„Our Jewishness is not a creed, it is ourself, our totality. Indeed, it may be fairly said that the surest evidence of your lack of seriousness in religion is the fact that your religions are not national, that you are not compromised and dedicated, en masse, to the faith.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 73).
„In the heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Is your God an Englishman or an American?“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 75).
„Professor Albert Einstein, German-Jewish refugee and Jewry’s greatest living idol, according to an Associated Press Dispatch of September 11, 1940, in an address at the Conference of Science, Philosophy and Religion at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, urged religious teachers to ‘give up the doctrine of a personal God, that is, give that source of fear and hope which in the past placed such vast power in the hands of priests.’ Professor Einstein obviously intended the word ‘priests’ to include ministers and preachers as well as priests. This is another way of advocating the false doctrine of Marx (Mordecai), Lenin, and Trotsky (Bronstein) that religion is the opium of the people.“ (War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, p. 143).
„Take the curious placing of the thumb to thumb and forefinger to forefinger by the High Priest when he lifted his hands, palms outward, to bless the multitude...Much of the drama’s text was from the Old Testament and Orthodox Ritual of Judaism.“ (The Romance of a People).
„As I looked upon that spectacle, as I saw the flags of the nations carried to their places before the reproduction of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem, and as I saw the six-pointed star, the illuminated interlaced triangles, shining above all the flags of all the peoples of all the world, my mind turned back to what Judge Harry M. Fisher, Chairman of the Jewish Day Committee, said in advance as to the whole idea of this pageant: ‘The idea summarized by the prophet Isaiah - ‘At the end of days all peoples shall be coming to the mountain of the Lord’ - will be portrayed.’” (The Visionary on the Mountain Top).
„The Jews are not a part of a vast Whole which they re-integrate in dying, but they are a Whole in themselves, defying space, time, life, and death. Can God be outside the Whole? If he exists, necessarily he confounds himself with this Whole...Thus Divinity in Judaism is contained in the exaltation of the entity represented by the Race - passionnel entity, eternal flame, it is the Divine essence. It must be preserved and perpetuated, therefore the idea of pure and impure was created.“ (Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, (1929)).
„‘I am that I am,’ said the Eternal. The Eternal - it is the race. One in substance - undifferentiated. One in time - stable and eternal.“ (Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, (1929)).
„A Mantra is composed of certain letters arranged in definite sequence of sounds, of which the letters are the representative signs. To produce the designed effect, Mantra must be intoned in the proper way, according to rhythm and sound...a Mantra is a potent compelling force, a word of power.“ (Arthur Avalon, Tantra of the Great Liberation, in a partial explanation of the Jewish Cabala or Kabbalah; Light-Bearers of Darkness, Inquire Within, p. 73)
„The purpose, the manner of attaining this happiness, of gaining this Liberation, is in your own hand. It does not lie in the hand of some unknown god, or in temples or in churches, but in your own self. For temples, churches, and religions bind, and you must be belong all dreams of God in order to attain this Liberation. There is no external God as such who urges us to live nobly, or to live basely; there is but the voice of our own intuition...When that voice is sufficiently strong, when that voice - the result of accumulated experience, is obeyed, and you yourself become that voice, then you are god...So the most important thing is to uncover this god within each one of you. That is the purpose of life; to awaken the dormant god (the unused sex-force, the Kundalini within you) to give life to the spark which exists in each one of us, so that we become a flame (illuminised), and join the eternal flame of the world (the universal life-force or ether, as above so below, of Hermes)...In the permanent is established, is seen, the only god in the world - yourself that has been purified.“ (The Creed of the Cabalistic Jews - the Deified Man - the origin of Humanism; Star Review Magazine, Paris September 27, 1927: Teachings given at Ommen, August 1927).
„(The Wandering Jew says) Aye, let the Nazarene (True Israelites) dogs lift their hands and eyes in ignorant wonder; the great Goldsmid was my very and mere instrument: I raised him because I deemed him worthy; I found him incompetent to the vast and sacred duty I designed him for, and I dashed him down even as we cast aside the gourd when we no longer require a drinking-cup. Who among the elder frequenters of the great Temple of Mammon, which is called the Exchange, does not remember the golden box with which the hand of Goldsmid was perpetually occupied in his busiest and most important moments! It was his talisman. The words of power had been pronounced above it; with it he could encounter a world and be triumphant...I had warned him again and again; I had menaced, I had entreated, but in vain; I found him incurable in his neglect of the cause of our people and our god; and even while he was wassailing at his luxurious villa in the neighborhood of Morden, the words of power went forth from my lips, and his talisman had departed from him for ever...He appeared upon the Exchange without his palladium; bargained, lost, and saw absolute ruin looking at him with steadfast and unpitying eyes. Two days he bore this, and then he blew his brains out! None can be false to our cause and prosper.“ (Nesta Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements)
„There is no people in history so narrowly and so ferociously conservative and traditionalist as the People of Israel, and its national traditions are all religious; we find ourselves in the presence of this unique, strange, and bizarre composition - a people religion and a religion-people, the two ideas are inseparable.“ (Le Problème Juif,“ 1921, Georges Batault)
„Humanity changes, empires arise and fall, ideals spring up, become resplendent, and are extinguished, the Jew remains, Judaism remains clothed in its fierce exclusivism, hoping all from the future, indefatigable, superhuman, inhuman...A people without land, wandering nation, dispersed race, they preserve a country, their religion...ever pursuing the mirage of a golden age, a new era, a messianic time when the world would live in joy and peace, subject to Yahweh, serving his Law under the rule of the sacerdotal people, who had been prepared by trials for the attainment of this hour...[This] the most conservative among peoples is justly reputed as being possessed by a spirit of inextinguishable revolt...they are eternally unadaptable, and can only hope for subversion...“ (Le Problème Juif, 1921, Georges Batault)
Wednesday, July 24, 2024
Perfidious Putin’s Plans to Flood Russia with ‘Refugees’
Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/perfidious-putins-plans-to-flood-russia-with-refugees/
Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Russian President Vladimir Putin
Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Russian President Vladimir Putin
Renegade Editor’s Note: Check the link below for the full story.
from Bob in DC
Mudsharking Russia: The Putin Plans
https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/putin-has-already-drafted-a-plan
In 2023 at the Valdai Club* there was a proposal to attract as many refugees from Africa as possible to Russia. This was proposed by Dmitry Poletaev, an employee of the Institute of National Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He even spoke about the fact that specifically for the future import of refugees from Africa, it is necessary to change the legislation of Russia.
It seems that the authorities want to change the racial and national composition of the inhabitants of Russia in every possible way, and turn the Russians into a minority in general.
*If you don’t know, Valdai is sort of the Rossiyan Bilderberg or Davos equivalent for Putin and his cabal of oligarchs and spooks and psychos. They invite weirdos from all over the world to participate and spend colossal sums at these events. Most of the money goes to hookers and coke, as Riley has reported before. Valdai report:
“By 2035 the African population could reach 1.9 billion people, and in 2050 — 2.5 billion people. Because of the increasing competition for resources on this continent and growing risks of economic and political instability, forced migration flows from Africa to Russia may become a new component of the migration situation already in the medium term, and it is worthwhile to prepare for this in advance.
It is necessary to develop and improve migration legislation; improve statistical accounting and the comprehensive analysis of data on migration; to develop a system of integration and adaptation for migrants who do not know the language, culture, and life arrangements in Russia well; support the work of non-governmental organisations in the field of migration; as well as expand and develop migration policy programmes in the Russian Federation.”
They are planning to subsidize the invasion!
P.S. Putin calls for “full-scale implementation” of digital ruble
Monday, July 22, 2024
Saturday, July 20, 2024
How It Fits Together
If this video is not available in your country use TOR Browser to watch it – fight the jewish censorship!
by Dr. William L. Pierce (pictured)
We’ve talked about many subjects on these American Dissident Voices programs, but one theme which has appeared in nearly every program has been the role of the Jews, either in our history or in our lives today. To a certain extent that’s been unavoidable, because of the influence they have over current events through their control of the mass media and because of their historical role in communism. But it’s more than that.
What I’ve said, in one way or another on several programs, is that the Jewish role in our lives goes far beyond the fact that their control of the news and entertainment media gives them a big influence on popular culture and on the political process. Today I want to talk again about this Jewish role. I want to try to give you an overview of it first. There are about 14 million Jews in the world today, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica Yearbook for 1997. Nearly half of those – about six million – are now in North America, where they make up just over two per cent of the population but wield far more influence than any other group.
The world’s 14 million Jews think and act like one big family – even though, like most families, they do a lot of arguing and squabbling among themselves. They go to different synagogues – Orthodox and Conservative and Reform – or to no synagogue at all. There are atheist Jews, and there are Jews who have converted to Christianity. There are capitalist Jews and communist Jews, homosexual Jews and heterosexual Jews. There are rich Jews and middle-class Jews and even a few poor Jews, but despite this apparent diversity they do a better job of cooperating with each other and looking out for their common interests than any other ethnic group in the world.
Why is this? Why are Jews more racially conscious than anyone else? Why are they so much more ready to collaborate with each other than members of other groups? Part of the reason is in their religion. It is an ethnocentric religion, a racist religion. Whereas Christianity and Islam, for example, are universalist religions, religions for anyone who chooses to believe in them, Judaism is not. Judaism is a religion only for the Chosen People, only for the circumcised sons of Abraham. Jews are defined in terms of their bloodline, not in terms of their faith, which is why non-religious Jews like Freud or Trotsky or even Marx, the father of atheistic communism, are considered just as much Jews as the most pious synagogue-goer, with sidelocks and yarmulke. The non-religious Jews don’t believe the hocus-pocus in their Torah, or Old Testament, but they nevertheless are steeped in the folklore and traditions of Judaism. They are as familiar as their religious cousins are with the claims that Jews are a Chosen People, destined to own all of the world’s wealth and be waited on hand and foot by non-Jews. And they are familiar with the tales of persecution, from the time of the pharaohs until the time of Hitler: with the tradition of being universally hated by all the other peoples of the world – which is why they believe they are justified in avenging themselves on non-Jews whenever they have the opportunity.
I’ll not spend any time quoting Bible verses to you today, but if you doubt what I’ve just told you about the religious basis for Jewish ethnocentrism, just read the Old Testament: especially the five books of Moses and the book of Isaiah. Study them carefully. Even the bowdlerized King James translation is pretty clear. If you really want to rub your nose in this subject, do some browsing in the Talmud – or for a solid scientific treatment, read the books recently written by a real expert on the subject, California State University psychology professor Dr. Kevin MacDonald. All three of his books are available from National Vanguard Books, the sponsor of this program. Those books are subtitled Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, and An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements. Pretty heavy reading, but very convincing, very thorough.
This tendency of the Jews to stick together, always to favor their fellow Jews over non-Jews, and to work for the interests of their tribe instead of just for their individual interests is a fact: a very enviable fact. It is the primary reason for their extraordinary level of wealth and power through the ages.
You know, there are clubby little groups of White men who cooperate with each other to advance their interests. But those interests are personal and individual, not racial or even tribal. And virtually all of the really influential groups of this sort – the Council on Foreign Relations, for example, or groups of very rich and powerful men, corporate bosses or bankers, are in fact heavily larded with Jews. They’re not racial groups at all, even if they don’t have any Blacks or Chinamen in them. They’re simply special-interest groups, whereas the 14 million Jews of the world form a huge, self-conscious racial-interest group. They really are unique in this regard.
I wish that our people had the same degree of racial consciousness the Jews do. The Jews understand the power of togetherness. Most of our people don’t. And this is largely the reason why we’re in the mess we’re in today. I’ll come back to this point in a few minutes.
The second thing for us to understand about the Jews is their very unusual mode of existence, living nearly everywhere as a small minority among other peoples. If one looks at their history in the Biblical period, they were at most times a people on the move, living as strangers and aliens among other peoples, getting kicked out of one place after another, always on terms of enmity with the Gentile host population. Only for a little over 400 years, from approximately the time of King David until the Babylonian conquest, did they really have a national existence in the ordinary sense of the word, with geographical borders. When the Babylonians dispersed the Jews throughout the Middle Eastern and the Mediterranean world in the middle of the sixth century BC, the Jews adapted amazingly well to being a minority everywhere and a majority nowhere. Five hundred years later, in the first century BC, the Greek writer Strabo commented: “The Jews have penetrated every country, so that it is difficult to find any place in the world where their tribe has not entered and become dominant.” Note those words: “There is no place where they have not become dominant.” The great geographer and historian Strabo was not the only scholar of the ancient world to make that observation about the Jews. The Jews became dominant by accumulating a substantial portion of the wealth of every country that they infiltrated. And they accumulated their wealth by collaborating with each other and preying on the host population. Their collaboration was based on their racial consciousness, on their conviction that they were a distinct and unique people, superior to the people among whom they lived and deserving of whatever they could take away from their hosts. The Jews in Rome did not think of themselves as Romans who happened to believe in Judaism, but as Jews who happened to live in Rome. And the same for every other country where they lived.
With the sort of attitude and behavior the Jews had they were bound to be hated by everyone – and they reciprocated. The Jews regarded the hatred they had for their hosts as justified, just as they considered deceiving and exploiting their hosts to be justified; but their hosts’ hatred of the Jews they regarded as “bigotry” and “persecution.” Their history is a chronicle of one “persecution” after another, right down to modern times. During the Middle Ages they were kicked en masse out of every country in Europe, repeatedly. They pretend today that this supposed “persecution” was the result of religious bigotry on the part of their hosts, but in fact it was simply self-defense on the part of their hosts, the same sort of reaction to their presence that the Egyptians and the Greeks and the Romans and everyone else in pre-Christian times had had. And it was this barrier of hatred between the Jews and the rest of the world which made it possible for them to maintain their identity and their sense of racial self-consciousness. If you want to study some of these details of Jewish history for yourself, there are many good books available. One I have read and found valuable is A History of the Jews by Abram Sachar. Sachar was the president of Brandeis University, and of course, he looks at history very subjectively and from a very Jewish point of view. But his history is revealing, and you can find it in most large libraries.
Now, this peculiar mode of existence of the Jews I have described changed to a certain extent shortly after the Second World War, with the theft of Palestine and the establishment of the new state of Israel on Palestinian territory. Today one-third of the world’s Jews live in Israel, but this is only made possible because the other two-thirds are continuing their existence as parasitic minorities among Gentile hosts. Without a constant supply of money extorted from Germany, the United States, and other countries, Israel could not continue to exist. Israel would have gone under half-a-dozen times in its warfare with its neighbors during the past 50 years if the United States had not provided massive military and diplomatic support. If all of the Jews in America and Europe sold their television networks and newspapers and film studios and moved to Israel, that flow of blood from their hosts would be cut off, and Israel soon would cease to exist.
The third thing we must understand about the Jews is the way in which they maintain their status as the dominant minority among us today. In Strabo’s day it was through their accumulated wealth. They were able to buy influence and special privileges for themselves. It remained that way pretty much for the next 1900 years. Throughout the Middle Ages they made themselves useful as sources of money to kings and popes and emperors. They would suck the wealth from the host population, and then give or lend some of it to the rulers in return for being allowed to keep their privileges. Although they usually were tolerated for their usefulness by the rulers, they were hated intensely by the general population. The Jews bought the tolerance of the rulers, but of course, they couldn’t afford to buy the tolerance of the people.
And so until quite recently the Jews maintained a separate existence among the host population, often living in ghettos, not mixing socially with their hosts, generally not engaging in the same occupations, and regarded with disdain if not revulsion by everyone. The great advantage for our people of this mode of existence was that the damage done by the Jews was mostly economic, although they also caused political mischief when it suited their needs. But they had almost no cultural influence on our people. They didn’t write books or plays, they didn’t paint or compose music, they didn’t clog up our universities, they didn’t run for public office, and of course, they didn’t have television studios or newspapers or advertising agencies. And so to a large extent they lived their lives, and we lived ours.
That began changing drastically approximately 200 years ago, with the advent of the mass media and mass democracy, and the change accelerated greatly during this century. Jews understood immediately the potential that newspapers and other media gave them for extending their influence from the rulers to the whole population, and democracy made this extension of their influence relevant; democracy provided the tool for transforming influence into power. I’ve described on other programs the way in which the Jews acquired control of our mass media and, through the media, control of the political process, and I won’t repeat that story today. There’s an up-to-date summary of Jewish media control in the National Vanguard Books catalog, which is available from the sponsor of this program.
But I do want to emphasize this very important point: the way in which the Jews maintain their position as the dominant minority in our society has changed. It used to be money-lending and bribes, and the pressure was exerted only at the top, on the political leaders of our society; today it’s control of the mass media of news and entertainment, and the pressure is exerted at every level of society. Some people still talk darkly about international Jewish bankers – and of course, there are such animals today, just as there also are international bankers who are not Jews – but the control of the media is the key to Jewish power today, not control of banking. The most important Jews today no longer are the Rothschilds and Warburgs and Hambros and Sassoons, but instead are the Eisners and Levins and Newhouses and Redstones and Bronfmans and Sulzbergers: the Jewish media bosses.
So now let’s look at the details of the Jewish application of influence through media control. Most people have a very limited range of real life experiences. Television and films and glossy magazine advertisements provide an enormous expansion of experience for the average person, by substituting artificial experiences for real experiences. On the television screen viewers experience artificial social relationships, artificial romances, artificial conflicts, artificial life. In advertisements they are given artificial ideals of beauty and fashion, artificial life-styles to which they can aspire. And in their newspapers and news-magazines they are given a carefully filtered, a carefully slanted, view of what is happening in the world.
And unfortunately most people do not have sufficient powers of discrimination to distinguish the artificial world of the media from the real world of everyday experience. The two worlds merge in their minds, and they can’t tell them apart. What people see on the television screen is not just entertainment; it is a collection of artificial experiences which merges with their collection of real experiences and gives them a new and largely artificial basis for evaluating things and making decisions. Cleverly designed advertisements don’t just show potential customers what is available and give them the information they need to choose what they want; clever advertising actually creates new wants, new desires, that didn’t exist before. The advertisements manipulate people’s desires and motivations. In a similar way television entertainment manipulates viewers psychologically. It changes their values and attitudes. It strongly affects the way they see things – including political issues and political candidates.
Well, I hardly have to tell you that the modern mass media give enormous power, unprecedented power, to whoever controls them – especially in a democracy. And really, no knowledgeable person who is honest will dispute my conclusion here. There are many people, who are not knowledgeable, who believe that they can watch television without being affected by it, who believe that they make up their minds independently without relying on the artificial reality supplied by television, but most of these people are mistaken, and the experts will agree with me on this. The mass media do shape public opinion, and in a democracy they do control the political process.
So now the only question which remains is this: To what end do the Jews who control the media use their control? What is their aim? What do they want? Now, the Politically Correct answer is that all the Jewish media bosses want is what any other businessman wants. The media bosses are simply businessmen, and their aim is simply to run their businesses at a profit.
Well, I’m sorry, but that simply isn’t true. It simply is not a coincidence that everywhere you look in the mass media you see Jews in control. It’s not a coincidence that a group making up only a little over two per cent of the population has virtually complete control over the mass media. The unanimity of the mass media on virtually every major issue of our time simply is not a coincidence. It is simply not a coincidence that the media bosses all just happen to have adopted the policy of hushing up Black-on-White crime and publicizing as widely as possible any White-on-Black crime. All of these things are planned and deliberate. They are the consequence of conscious collaboration. Only a fool can believe that it’s all just coincidence.
The Jewish media bosses know what they want. It is control – not just of the media, but of us: of everything. They want to own us and, to the extent that they cannot own us, to destroy us. Unfortunately, I cannot play for you a secret recording of one of their summit meetings, where they discuss their goals and their strategy, a la the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I can only offer you the historical record and common sense. The record, for those who have eyes to see and an open mind, is pretty clear, beginning with the account in the book of Genesis of the takeover of Egypt by Joseph and his brothers so that they could all “eat the fat of the land,” on through the ages to the Marxist takeover of Russia early in this century and the attempted takeover in many other countries.
You know, the Germans didn’t begin throwing the Jews out of Germany in the 1930s because of Christian bigotry. It was because they wanted their country back. The Germans wanted to run their own universities and schools, their own newspapers and films, their own legal and medical professions.
If you want to understand the historical record, you must study it. I can’t go through all of that for you in a half-hour program. I can only point the way. And as for the common-sense aspect of understanding what the Jewish media bosses are up to, we just need to clear the cobwebs out of our heads and realize that every racially conscious group strives for mastery, for domination, not just the Jews. That’s Nature’s way. That’s the way it is in every barnyard and every schoolyard.
And that is why the media propaganda takes the deliberate slant it does: trying to make us feel guilty, trying to kill our sense of racial consciousness while the Jews keep theirs, trying to persuade us to give up our arms, trying to silence all our dissident voices. Their aim is for us to be racially unconscious, for us to be ashamed of our nature and our traditions, for us to be afraid to organize for our common good, afraid of being thought racists. The deliberate aim of the Jewish media propaganda is to disarm us morally, to make us rootless and defenseless, and then to destroy us. That is what is happening now.
Think about it, and you’ll see how it all fits together.
* * *
Source: Free Speech magazine, December 1998
Wednesday, July 17, 2024
Elie Wiesel, Saint of the Holocaust - A Critical Biography
3rd, updated edition
Source: https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=30
by Walter N. Sanning
DOWNLOAD THE BOOK IN PDF AND EPUB FORMAT.
The author of this book weaves together five compelling and interrelated narratives. The book’s main concern is to present the world’s first unauthorized biography of Elie Wiesel. It shines the light of truth on the mythomaniac who, in the 1970s, transformed the word “Holocaust” and made it the brand name of the world’s greatest hoax: the unfounded claim by an extremist segment of World Jewry to the effect that the German government’s wartime policy of territorial transfer of Europe’s Jews out of the Reich was in actuality an “extermination program.” In these pages, both Wiesel’s personal deceits and the whole myth of “the six million” are mercilessly exposed and laid bare for the reader’s perusal. Unfortunately, Zionist control of the U.S. Government as well as the nation’s media and academic apparatus has allowed Wiesel and his fellow extremists to force a string of U.S. presidents to genuflect before this imposter as symbolic acts of subordination to World Jewry, while simultaneously forcing U.S. school children to submit to Holocaust brainwashing by their teachers.
The second strand involves close readings of several of Wiesel’s published texts, with emphasis on his alleged “autobiography,” the novel Night. The author demonstrates Wiesel’s appalling ignorance of both the physical details and layouts of the Auschwitz and Buchenwald camps, and this ignorance also extends to German administrative protocols and procedures. Amazingly, the novel’s chronology of the events said to have “really happened” in the author’s life is also disjointed, confusing and internally contradictory. The author also shows the role played by the meme of “retroactive continuity” in the telling of the Holocaust story.
The third strand involves an historical account of the rise of Holocaust revisionism mainly in the U.S. and France in response to the many obvious lies contained in the Jewish Holocaust narrative. From the sudden appearance of the revisionist work of Profs. Butz and Faurisson in the 1970s, through the Zündel trials of the 1980s, to the work of contemporary revisionists like Bradley R. Smith, Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, Thomas Kues and others today, this study shows, through the words of the Holocaustian extremists themselves, how effective the revisionists have been in demolishing their lies.
The fourth strand shows how certain ambitious and unscrupulous U.S. Catholic intellectuals have hitched a ride on the Holocaust bandwagon as a means of advancing their careers. Ritual denunciation of the alleged “silence” of Pope Pius XII is unfortunately very much a part of this behavior.
Finally, the fifth strand concerns all those U.S. Jews, young and old, who have been turned off by one or another aspect of the Holocaust story and its use within the U.S. Jewish community, but who never criticize it openly for non-Jewish ears. As for younger U.S. Jews, Rabbi Jacob Neusner has been pointing out for years that it has not kept them Jewish. What he calls the “Holocaust and Redemption” cult within U.S. Jewry has contributed to a pronounced abandonment of Jewish identity through intermarriage with non-Jews at percentages never before seen or even imagined.
Sunday, July 14, 2024
Friday, July 12, 2024
Absolute Immunity
Source: https://codoh.com/library/document/absolute-immunity/
“You need to know that the least of peasants, and what is even more, the beggar is just as much a human being as is his majesty, and he has to find justice by that fact that all humans are equal before the law; it may be a prince suing the peasant or vice versa, then the prince will be equal to the peasant before the law: and in such affairs it has to be proceeded purely by justice with no regard to the person. The justice councils in all provinces have to only comply with this. And wherever they do not go straight forward with justice without regard of person or class and put aside natural justness, they shall get in trouble with his royal majesty. A legal council which exercises injustices is more dangerous and worse than a gang of thieves; one can protect oneself against those, but nobody can protect himself against rogues who use the robes of justice to carry out their vicious passions; they are worse than the biggest scoundrels in the world and deserve double punishment.” – Friedrich von Hohenzollern, King of Prussia[1]
On June 30, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that all U.S. presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts that were committed within their “exclusive sphere of constitutional authority,” and “presumptive immunity” for other official acts,[2] which means that immunity is assumed until proven otherwise by one of the parties in a litigation.[3]
This ruling probably leads to the collapse of most if not all criminal proceedings against former U.S. President Donald Trump currently tried before various courts. Accordingly, Trump supporters were as ecstatic about this decision, as his opponents were horrified.
While I have my own views on the Trump drama unfolding here in the U.S. ever since he first decided to run for office, I want us all to take a step back and consider what this means in general and for all of us, both in the U.S. as well as abroad.
Immunity from prosecution for government officials is an old concept. In countries transitioning from absolute to parliamentary monarchy, such as the UK and Germany, immunity was introduced for members of parliament in order to protect them from persecution through prosecution by the monarch. The institution was maintained even after the monarchy had been abolished, as is the case in Germany, or where the monarch had lost most of his powers to initiate prosecutes, such as the UK. Therefore, the original reason for immunity no longer exists. It now merely serves as protection against common folks as well as political rivals.
I initiated this article for a good reason with a quote from the writings of Frederick the Great. Giving people – no matter the branch of government they serve in – governmental powers that can be abused to oppress and persecute people, but then making them immune against attempts to hold them accountable for such acts, is a safe way into tyranny. Bestowing power on anyone should not come with less accountability, but with more.
Germany’s historical experience during the National-Socialist period has led to the West-German legislature introducing a fundamental change in its penal law: following in Frederick the Great’s footsteps, the law was amended by stipulations that threatened any person committing a crime as a government official with a higher maximum penalty than those who had committed their crimes privately. Since this also threatened the very persons having enacted those provisions, they were deleted from the record in later years.
The person in the world holding the most powers in his hands should not only NOT be immune from criminal persecution. That person should be held accountable with a multifold threat of punishment for crimes committed while acting as an official.
To give this a very concrete reference point, let me give you a concrete example. What would you think should happen to a person who kidnaps another individual and holds that individual imprisoned for many years, just because he feels like it? Anyone can file a criminal complaint against that person. An investigation with arrest, prosecution and sentencing would surely follow, probably resulting in a prison term of many years for the felon.
When a U.S. government official of the executive branch does the same thing – arresting lawful residents in the U.S. and ensuring their incarceration for many years – then the consequence is – nothing. Filing a criminal complaint against that person with the executive branch will go nowhere. It would be like filing a complaint with a robber for his robbing.
This is exactly what happened to me in 2005. An act of Congress of 1961 clearly states that, as the husband of a U.S. citizen, I had the right to permanently reside in the U.S. And yet, the Jew Michael Chertoff, back then recently put in charge of the U.S. Department for Homeland Security, decided to have me arrested for no reason other than his contempt for me, and have me shipped to a country where he knew – and hoped – that I would be imprisoned for a long time for acts which were and are perfectly legal in the U.S. Which personal consequence did this criminal act have for him? None.
Former U.S. presidents had to hide false-flag operations, not just in order to make them effective, but also in order to prevent personal consequences. Will this still be the case when they commit such acts in the future in pursuance of the official duty of keeping the country safe from its enemies?
The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is seen as a partisan, pro-Trump decision, as it helps Trump in his attempt to win the coming election. The fact that this 6:3 split decision runs exactly along the judges’ party affiliations supports this claim. However, the danger really lies in those future acts by U.S. presidents that have bipartisan support.
We may assume that the conflict between Israel and its Arab neighbors will continue or may even escalate more in the future. It is also possible, in fact rather likely, that Holocaust revisionism will gaining traction among opponents of Zionist genocidal tendencies. To pull the emergency brake – for “the safety of the nation” or rather for the safety of the U.S. government’s Zionist occupiers – a future U.S. president may issue an executive order to arrest, incarcerate and, where possible, deport all Holocaust skeptics in violation of all kinds of laws, the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment included. Who is going to stop him? There will be no consequence for him whatsoever.
And what about yet another 9/11 false-flag operation to expand Zion’s wars to include all Muslim nations? As was the case regarding 9/11, no one in Congress is likely to initiate or, if tried, likely to succeed with attempts to launch an investigation, let alone an impeachment, in such a case. The judiciary will never see a case either, because the prosecution is controlled by the U.S. president as long as he holds that office. And once he steps down, he enjoys absolute or at least presumptive immunity.
Knowing that they are immune from prosecution, the temptation to violate the law will be almost irresistible for all future presidents.
Power corrupts – absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Immunity corrupts – absolute immunity corrupts absolutely.
Immunity for officers of the government is a holy cow that needs to be slaughtered.
A government official who exercises injustices is more dangerous and worse than a gang of thieves; one can protect oneself against those, but nobody can protect himself against rogues who use their official powers to carry out their vicious passions; they are worse than the biggest scoundrels in the world and deserve not immunity from prosecution, but double punishment.
America needs a new Independence Day.
Happy Fourth of July!
Endnotes
[1] Bruno Frank, Friedrich der Große als Mensch im Spiegel seiner Briefe, Deutsche Buch-Gemeinschaft, Berlin 1926, p. 99.
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States_(2024)
Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)