The Year 1944 – Part 5
The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Thursday, October 9, 2025
Monday, October 6, 2025
Jewish Invention Myths: Blood Groups
Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-invention-myths-blood-groups/
by Karl Radl
Another common ‘jewish invention’ myth which proved difficult to crack the truth of is the claim that a Viennese jew named Karl Landsteiner ‘discovered blood groups’ in 1901. (1) This however is accurate since Landsteiner didn’t ‘discover blood groups’ but rather created the classification system building on the research of non-jewish scientists over the preceding two decades as Joan Stevenson explains:
‘In the late 1800’s, immunology was developing rapidly as scientists examined the various physiological changes associated with bacterial infection. Some pathologists studied the way cells helped the body fight disease; others favored a central role for noncellular, or humoral, factors. In 1886, George Nuttall showed how serum (the fluid remaining after a clot is removed from blood) can be toxic to microorganisms. Others obtained similar results, and although debate continued regarding cellular versus humoral immunity, most researchers focused on the humoral response to disease. It was during this period that the term “antigen” was used to refer to any substance inducing a reaction against itself by the host organism. “Antibody” referred to the factor in the serum that could react with the foreign substance.
In 1894, Richard Friedrich Johannes Pfeiffer of the Institute for Infectious Diseases in Berlin injected cholera into guinea pigs and observed a series of changes in the cholera organisms: loss of mobility, clumping, loss of stainability, and eventual disappearance. His work inspired others. Max von Gruber, a bacteriologist at the Hygiene Institute in Vienna, was particularly interested in the clumping, or agglutination, of foreign cells. He and his student Herbert Edward Durham discovered that antibodies cause the agglutination of disease organisms and that particular antibodies react only with like or closely related microorganisms. Also influenced by Pfeiffer, Jules Bordet of the Pasteur Institute demonstrated in the late 1890’s that agglutination and hemolysis occurred after red blood cells from one species were injected into another. He pointed out that this response was similar to the body’s reaction to foreign microorganisms.
[…]
Samuel Shattock, an English pathologist, almost discovered the human blood groups. In 1899 and 1900, he described the clumping of red cells by serum from patients with acute pneumonia and certain other diseases. He could not find the clumping in the serums of normal persons because of his small sample size, and he concluded that his results reflected a disease process.
Karl Landsteiner synthesized the results of all the experiments noted above and provided a simple but correct explanation. He joined the University Hospital in Vienna and began advanced study in organic chemistry. At the age of twenty-eight, he joined Gruber at the Hygiene Institute in Vienna and soon began a lifelong interest in immunology. Almost two years later, he transferred to the Institute of Pathological Anatomy of Anton Weichselbaum.’ (2)
Stevenson’s point here is that contrary to the ‘received wisdom’ that Landsteiner ‘discovered blood groups’ in truth Landsteiner simply took the research of Nuttall, Pfeiffer, von Gruber, Durham, Bordet and Shattock and provided a classification system for what they had already observed and theorised. In truth Shattock in particular had already discovered blood groups in 1899/1900 before Landsteiner in 1901 but mistook what he was observing as being the result of disease rather than being part of blood itself.
Further what is often not stated is that Landsteiner had been an assistant of von Gruber’s from 1896-1898 at the Hygiene Institute in Vienna just when von Gruber and Durham were studying blood groups and had created what became known as the Gruber-Durham reaction based on the agglutination of human cells – including blood – which was the true basis of Landsteiner’s work and blood group system.
The question that remains is that given von Gruber left the Hygiene Institute in Vienna in 1902 – alleging poor working conditions – and transferred to the Hygiene Institute in Munich the year after Landsteiner’s ‘discovery’; did this have something to do with Landsteiner taking the credit for von Gruber and Durham’s work on blood cells?
It is quite plausible given that von Gruber and Durham’s work was the basis for Landsteiner’s ‘discovery’ and the timing fits such a scenario rather well, but as we have no direct evidence that Landsteiner stole von Gruber and Durham’s work on blood cells and presented it as his own; we have to point out that all Landsteiner ever actually did was classify the research of others rather than doing something truly new.
Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.
References
(1) For example: https://mnews.world/en/news/the-great-jews-and-their-inventions
(2) https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/discovery-human-blood-groups
Friday, October 3, 2025
The Kennedys vs The Jews
Sources: https://www.renegadetribune.com/the-kennedys-vs-the-jews/
by Donald Jeffries
A century long battle
Joseph Kennedy, Sr. became the youngest bank president in U.S. history, at just twenty five years of age. We have been told he was a scoundrel. A bootlegger. In bed with the mafia. Who cheated on his wife with actress Gloria Swanson. A man who used his fortune to buy his unqualified son the presidency. As always, we are being lied to.
In 1937, a young JFK wrote, “Adolf Hitler is among the greatest of men. The old trust him, and the youth idolize him. It is the veneration of a national hero who has served his country.” In 1945, on the verge of first running for political office, JFK declared, “Hitler will emerge from the hatred currently surrounding him in a few years as one of the most important personalities that ever lived.” JFK also stated that Hitler “had a mystery about him in the way he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.” That same year, JFK toured Europe with his father’s close friend James Forrestal, who became Truman’s Secretary of Defense, and was later pushed out a window at Bethesda Naval Hospital. By an amazing coincidence, Forrestal happened to be one of the most vocal critics of the newly created state of Israel.
In 1939, twenty two year old John F. Kennedy visited Palestine, which definitely did exist despite the protestations of modern Zionists, and left his impressions in a remarkably insightful letter to his father. I nearly included this letter as an Appendix to my book American Memory Hole. In his opening line, JFK reveals that he and his father have discussed this subject before: “Dear Dad: I thought I would write you my impressions on Palestine while they were still fresh in my mind, though you undoubtedly, if I know the Jews, know the ‘whole’ story. It is worth while looking at it in its entirety.” JFK writes, “On the Jewish side there is the desire for complete domination, with Jerusalem as the capital of their new land of milk and honey, with the right colonize in Trans-Jordan. They feel that given sufficient opportunity they can cultivate the land and develop it as they have done in the Western portion. The Arab answer to this is incidentally, that the Jews have had the benefit of capital, which had the Arabs possessed, equal miracles could have been performed by them.”
Showing a keen awareness and intellectual maturity for someone so young, Kennedy goes on to describe how, “There were 13 bombs set off my last evening there, all in the Jewish quarter and all set off by Jews. The ironical part is that the Jewish terrorists bomb their own telephone lines and electric connections and the next day frantically phone the British to come and fix them up….The sympathy of the people on the spot seems to be with the Arabs. This is not only because the Jews have had, at least some of their leaders, an unfortunately arrogant, uncompromising attitude, but they feel that after all, the country has been Arabic for the last few hundred years…” Old Joe was an unsurprising critic of financing and creating the modern state of Israel. It is impossible to imagine all those legendary dinner conversations with his children without his strong views influencing them.
Old Joe had all the right enemies, from FDR to Winston Churchill. As I revealed in my book American Memory Hole, FDR once tried to humiliate him in the Oval Office by having him remove his trousers for some absurd reason. FDR here sounds like a fledgling screenwriter, in addition to being a corrupt Hall of Fame conspirator. Old Joe’s pride and joy was his oldest son Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr., who was alleged to be as openly anti-Jewish as his father was. This information came from one of countless anti-Kennedy books published over the last fifty years, Nigel Hamilton’s Reckless Youth. The elite have succeeded in firmly attaching the word “reckless” to the Kennedys. You think reckless, and you picture JFK. RFK. JFK, Jr. And now RFK, Jr. As Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. noted in his book American Values, all the negative images of his grandfather originated from either Mafia or CIA sources.
RFK, Jr. described how his grandfather had served on the little known Hoover Commission, appointed by President Truman, to investigate the activities of the CIA. As RFK, Jr. wrote, “Alan Dulles manipulated the law, and did a lot of backroom deals to get these huge secret budgets and began really engaging in all of the mischief. And my grandfather was on a commission that looked at this and saw what they had done. And when they were overthrowing democracies in Guatemala and Iran and all over the world, he (Joe Kennedy, Sr.) said ‘we should dismantle it. We should remove the Plans Division,’ which was the ‘dirty tricks’ division. Alan Dulles never forgave him, or my family for that. And when my Uncle came in, and did the Bay of Pigs, he then fired Dulles.” RFK, Jr. also disclosed that Old Joe was a true antiwar activist, having also opposed our entry into World War I.
Old Joe’s poignant declaration, in a radio address, that “America ought to stay out of the war,” and that our goal should be to establish a “just and lasting peace” foretold his son’s timeless June 1963 American University “peace” speech, which essentially signed his death warrant. Old Joe had a quite a personal stake here, with the lives of his three oldest sons on the line. Tragically, Joe, Jr. would die in a senseless and still unexplained plane crash, after volunteering for a nonsensical mission to bomb a long abandoned German site. His daughter Kathleen would then die, incredibly enough, in another plane crash. Jack nearly died, and became a true war hero by tugging an injured crew member to safety by gripping the rope of his PT109 lifejacket between his teeth, and swimming over three miles to safety. Later, both Jack and Robert would die by assassination. Four of his children dying unnaturally in separate incidents.
Michael Collins Piper, author of the long neglected JFK assassination book Final Judgment, wrote another book before his premature death. Titled Confessions of an Anti-Semite, it includes conversations between then ambassador to England Joseph Kennedy, Sr., and a wealthy Hollywood agent, model, and TV executive named DeWest Hooker, which focused on disproportionate Jewish media and financial clout in America. Piper described Hooker as “an extremely handsome, aristocratic-looking man with broad shoulders and brilliant blue eyes” who had appeared in every national magazine as the model for Hathaway shirts and wore a patch over one eye. He was also the lead male model for Chesterfield cigarettes. One of the most explosive things Old Joe told Hooker was “We (meaning patriotic non-Jews) lost World War Two, and the Jews won.” Throughout 1938, Ambassador Kennedy had attempted to meet with Adolf Hitler, without the approval of the State Department.
Thanks to Piper’s unwanted research, we now know that President Kennedy was engaged in a behind the scenes battle with Israeli President David Ben-Gurion at the time of his assassination. JFK was incensed over the Israelis developing nuclear weapons. It wasn’t until recently that I learned that November 22, 1963 just happened to be the fifty third anniversary of the day the bankers who plotted to create the Federal Reserve system first met in Hoboken, New Jersey. JFK and his brother, Attorney General Bobby Kennedy, had infuriated Zionist leaders by supporting an investigation led by Senator William Fulbright (whom Kennedy had unsuccessfully tried to name as Secretary of State) aimed at registering the American Zionist Council as a “foreign agent” subject to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, which would have rendered its lobbying division, the AIPAC, nearly powerless.
As a senator, John F. Kennedy had unequivocally supported Arab nationalism in 1957, and reversed Eisenhower’s foreign policy in a pro-Nasser way by committing the U.S. to support U.N. Resolution 194, regarding the right of return of Palestinian refugees. That was a major threat to Zionist interests, who’d been devoted to making Nasser an enemy of the United States. So it is pretty clear that JFK was the last president who wasn’t a Zionist. Who was, in fact, an enemy of Zionism. And who happened to be the son of one of Zionism’s long time opponents. At the beginning of his presidency, JFK was faced with the CIA’s disastrous Bay of Pigs plan, for which he fired the top three officials in the Agency, including director Allen Dulles. The same Dulles who already despised his father. The same Dulles who would serve on the Warren Commission which covered up his assassination. JFK is the last president to stand up to Israel. And the last man to occupy the White House who actually thought he was in charge.
Isn’t it just a bit strange that the same usual suspects, the bought and paid for court historians and news “analysts,” never paint JFK with the anti-Semitic brush? These are the same presstitutes, to use Gerald Celente’s phrase, that have claimed he was too sick to be president, but also was having nonstop sex with the most beautiful women in the world at the same time. Who have branded him (and his entire family) as “reckless” and irresponsible. An empty suit who was pumped full of legal and illegal drugs to give him the appearance of vibrant health. But little mention of his (or his father’s) attitude towards Jews. They have plenty of anecdotal evidence, which is far more credible than all the bootlegging/mafia nonsense. According to former Kennedy embassy aide Harvey Klemmer, Ambassador Joe Kennedy routinely referred to Jews as “kikes or sheenies”. Kennedy allegedly told Klemmer that “[some] individual Jews are all right, Harvey, but as a race they stink. They spoil everything they touch.“
Recently, I covered the Turning the Tide 9/11 Conference in Washington, D.C., organized by my friend Richard Gage. I was thrilled to meet Dennis Kucinich, one of my favorite modern politicians. In his address to the conference, Kucinich shocked me with just how anti-Zionist he was. I reflected upon how it was Kucinich that RFK, Jr. named as his presidential campaign chair. Kucinich would leave RFK Jr.’s campaign under unclear circumstances, after Kennedy’s perplexing remarks about how the Palestinians are the “most spoiled” people on earth, and how the IDF has never murdered civilians. RFK, Jr. cannot possibly believe this. His choice of Kucinich indicates that he, like his grandfather, father, and uncle, has deep reservations about Zionism. But then Rabbi Shmuley arrived on the scene, and became in effect RFK, Jr.’s handler. I can’t imagine how much Old Joe would despise Rabbi Shmuley.
Shmuley was tasteless enough to try and grift off the recent assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. Kirk’s death has demonstrated again the growing rift in America between those who are aware of the power of Zionism, over our foreign policy and domestic culture, and those who prefer to whistle past the synagogue. Old Joe Kennedy was one of the first critics of the Federal Reserve. As the head of his own small Hollywood studio, he understood first hand the disproportionate power that Jewish immigrants wielded even then over our civilization. He consistently stood for peace, and also recommended that the powers of the CIA be severely curtailed, two decades before the Church Committee hearings. His ill-timed stroke at the start of his son’s presidency prevented him from being the trusted advisor and confidante he’d always been during JFK’s short time in office.
The worlds of 1938, and of 1963, are still relevant today. The decisions made, to precipitate a bloodletting of millions of Europeans, and twenty five years later to murder the only peace seeking president this country has really ever had, are directly connected to the mess that is America 2.0. Old Joe Kennedy tried to do what he could to stop that bloodletting, and sacrificed a great deal himself in the process. The fanciful tales of Judith Campbell Exner have become accepted history. Old Joe was a horrible rapscalian, a morally bankrupt “appeaser,” or even a genuine “Nazi” himself. JFK was a total degenerate, and being his father’s son, slept with a Nazi spy. RFK probably had Marilyn Monroe killed. Teddy Kennedy, at best, let Mary Jo Kopechne drown. The same people who created the myth of Camelot destroyed it. And now, RFK, Jr. is depicted as beyond weird, with some perverse interest in roadkill. They even mock him for the unfortunate, inherited condition that impacts his voice.
So we see a historical pattern here, starting with family patriarch Joseph Kennedy, Sr. Privately suspicious of Jews in general, and certainly against the very creation of Israel. What would Old Joe think of the genocide in Gaza? How would President Kennedy feel about his dreams of liberated people ruling themselves everywhere, which was an updated version of the Founders’ “consent of the governed” argument, being shattered to pieces? Which is exactly the phrase he used to describe what he wanted to do to the CIA. We’ve come a long way from JFK demanding that Ben-Gurion stop nuclear development at Dimona, to sex toy peddler Rabbi Shmuley controlling his nephew’s position on Zionism. The Kennedys have been unfairly smeared by a “free press” that is disproportionately run by the same kind of people Old Joe railed against behind the scenes. It’s a war that the Kennedys lost, as their Body Count gruesomely shows. But it was also a huge defeat for the American people.
Tuesday, September 30, 2025
Saturday, September 27, 2025
Jews and Germany
„Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the aged! Kill every German -- wipe them out!“ (Llya Ehrenburg, Glaser, p. 111).
„The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end.“ (The Jewish newspaper, Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939)
„Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child.“ (Jewish professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937)
„Our fight against Germany must be carried to the limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us, therefore, defend Israel! Against the awakened Germany, we put an awakened Israel. And the world will defend us.“ (Jewish author Pierre Creange in his book Epitres aux Juifs, 1938)
„Judea declares War on Germany.“ (Daily Express, March 24, 1934)
„Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30-year War.“ (Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Dairy, p. 11).
„The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany...“ (Valadimir Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934)
„In fact, about 600 news-papers were officially banned during 1933. Others were unofficially silenced by street methods. The exceptions included Judische Rundschau, the ZVfD’s Weekly and several other Jewish publications. German Zionism’s weekly was hawked on street corners and displayed at news stands. When Chaim Arlosoroff visited Zionist headquarters in London on June 1, he emphasized, ‘The Rundschau is of crucial Rundschau circulation had in fact jumped to more than 38,000 -- four to five times its 1932 circulation. Although many influential Aryan publications were forced to restrict their page size to conserve newsprint, Judische Rundschau was not affected until mandatory newsprint rationing in 1937.
And while stringent censorship of all German publications was enforced from the outset, Judische Rundschau was allowed relative press freedoms. Although two issues of it were suppressed when they published Chaim Arlosoroff’s outline for a capital transfer, such seizures were rare. Other than the ban on anti-Nazi boycott references, printing atrocity stories, and criticizing the Reich, Judische Rundschau was essentially exempt from the so-called Gleichschaltung or ‘uniformity’ demanded by the Nazi Party of all facets of German society. Juedische Rundschau was free to preach Zionism as a wholly separate political philosophy -- indeed, the only separate political philosophy sanction by the Third Reich.“ (This shows the Jewish Zionists enjoyed a visibly protected political status in Germany, prior to World War II).
„...In Germany the Jews occupy the principal rìles and are first-rate revolutionaries. They are writers, philosophers, poets, orators, publicists, and bankers, and on their heads and in their hearts all the weight of ancient ignominy! They will one day be terrible for Germany...probably followed by a morrow terrible for them.“ (Rougeyron, 1861; Metternich, 1849; The Trail of the Serpent, Inquire Within, Miss Stoddard, p. 93).
„That German Jewry could raise the Star of David -- Emblazoned Zionist Flag...“ (Nuremburg Laws of 1935)
„I know in expressing with this frankness my ultimate opinion of the Jews, I expose myself to enormous danger. Many people share it, but very few dare to express it publicly, for the Jewish sect... constitutes today a veritable power in Europe. It reigns despotically in commerce, in the banks, and it has invaded three-quarters of German journalism, and a very considerable portion of the journalism of other countries. Woe, then, to him who has the clumsiness to displease it!“ (Study of the German Jews, (1869).
„In no place so much as in Germany do the Jews [in finance, industries and commerce] hold such an important, almost preponderant part. Therefore it might easily be said that all the newly-rich and war- profiteer, is an ancient of a thousand years...The immense majority of the influentials in Austrian Socialism were and are still Jews (1921) ...finally, in a certain sense the Jews oppose themselves to non-Jews, above all in the rìle they play as initiators and actors in the extreme-left parties as internationalism opposed to nationalism.“ (Le Probläme Juic, (1921), Georges Batault).
„The German revolution is the achievement of the Jews; the Liberal Democratic parties have a great number of Jews as their leaders, and the Jews play a predominant role in the high government offices.“ (The Jewish Tribune, July 5, 1920)
„I hope every German west of the Rhine River and wherever we attack, will be destroyed.“ (R.F. Keeling). (Rabbi Rabinovich’s Speech of January 12th, 1952)
„The story I shall unfold in these pages is the story of Germany’s two faces, the one turned towards Western Europe, the other turned towards Soviet Russia...It can be said, without any exaggeration, that from 1921 till the present day Russia has been able, thanks to Germany, to equip herself with all kinds of arms, munitions, and the most up-to-date war material for an army of several millions; and that, thanks to her factories manufacturing war material in Russia, Germany has been able to assure herself not only of secret supplies of war material and the training of officers and other ranks in the use of this material, but also, in the event of war, the possession of the best stocked arsenals in Russia...The firm of Krupp’s of Essen, Krupp the German Cannon-King (Kanonenkoenig), deserves a chapter to itself in this review of German war-industries in Russia.
It deserves a separate chapter...because its activity upon Soviet territory has grown to tremendous proportions...The final consolidation of the dominating position Krupp’s occupy in Russia, was the formation of a separate company ‘Manych’ to which the Soviet Government granted a liberal concession...Negotiations concerning these concessions for the company were conducted in Moscow, for several months...Gradually there was formed in Russia a chain of experimental training camps, and artillery parks (ostensibly eliminated by the Treaty of Versailles).
These are under the management of German officers, and they are invariably teeming with Germans either arriving to undergo a course of training, or leaving after the completion of the course...At the time of writing (1932) interest is growing in the rising star of Herr Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Leader. Herr Hitler is regarded as the protagonist par excellence of the Right against the Left in Germany, and, as a Hitlerist regime is anticipated before long, it may perhaps be argued that the Third Reich of the Nazis, the sworn enemies of Communism, would not tolerate the Reichswehr-Red Army connection. Such a conclusion would be inaccurate to the last degree ...Stalin, the realist, would have no qualms in collaboration with the Hitlerist Germany. But more important than this are the following facts: The Reichswehr Chiefs and their political allies amongst the civilian politicians and officials have succeeded in nursing their Eastern orientation, their underground military collaboration with the Soviets, in spite of all the changes of political regime in Germany since the end of the war. It has made little or no difference to them whether the Reich Government has been composed of men of the Right, the Center, or the Left. They have just continued their policy uninfluenced by political change. There is no reason to suppose that they would change their course under a Hitlerist regime, especially when it is remembered that most of the aims, in external policy, of the Nazi leaders, are identical with those of the Nationalists and the military leaders themselves. Furthermore, there are the great German industrialists, of Nationals color, who are amongst the principal collaborators, on the war material side, with the Reichswehr Chiefs, and who are, therefore, hand in glove with the directors of the ‘Abmachungen’ (Agreements) plot. Many of these great industrialists are contributors on a big scale to the Nazi party funds. A hitlerist Germany would, therefore, have no qualms in continuing the collaboration with Soviet Russia...The Reichswehr chiefs who are conducting the Abmachungen delude themselves that they can use Bolshevist Russia to help them in their hoped-for war of revenge against Europe, and then, in the hour of victory, hold the Bolshevists at bay, and keep them in their place. The more subtle psychologists at the Kremlin, of course, know better, but are wise enough to keep their knowledge to themselves. The fact, however, that this German-Russian plot will, in the end, bring about the destruction of Germany, will not in any way reconcile Europe to its own destruction at the hands of Germany and Russia together.“ (The Russian Face of Germany, Cecil F. Melville, pp. 4, 102, 114, 117, 120, 173-174, 176).
„In [pre-WW II] Berlin, for example, when the Nazis came to power, 50.2% of the lawyers were Jews...48% of the doctors were Jews. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and made great inroads on the educational system.“ (The House That Hitler Built, by Stephen Roberts, 1937).
„...Each of you, Jew and gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in the sacred war should do so now...“ (Samuel Undermeyer, Radio Broadcast, New York City, August 6, 1933)
„All Jews world wide -- declared war on the Third Reich.“ (The London Daily Express, Front Page Story, 3/24/1933).
„...Jabotinsky insisted that all energies be expended to force the Congress to join the boycott movement. Nothing less than a ‘merciless fight’ would be acceptable, cried Jabotinsky. ‘The present Congress is duty bound to put the Jewish problem in Germany before the entire world...(We [Jews] must) destroy, destroy, destroy them, not only with the boycott, but politically, supporting all existing forces against them to isolate Germany from the civilized world...our enemy [Germany] must be destroyed.“ (Speech by Vladimir Jabotinsky, a Polish Jews, on June 16, 1933)
„German Jewry, which found its temporary end during the Nazi period, was one of the most interesting and for modern Jewish history most influential centers of European Jewry. During the era of emancipation, i.e. in the second half of the nineteenth and in the early twentieth century, it had experienced a meteoric rise...It had fully participated in the rapid industrial rise of Imperial Germany, made a substantial contribution to it and acquired a renowned position in German economic life. Seen from the economic point of view, no Jewish minority in any other country, not even that in America could possibly compete with the German Jews. They were involved in large scale banking, a situation unparalled elsewhere, and, by way of high finance, they had also penetrated German industry.
A considerable portion of the wholesale trade was Jewish. They controlled even such branches of industry which is generally not in Jewish hands. Examples are shipping or the electrical industry, and names such as Ballin and Rathenau do confirm this statement.
I hardly know of any other branch of emancipated Jewry in Europe or the American continent that was as deeply rooted in the general economy as was German Jewry. American Jews of today are absolutely as well as relative richer than the German Jews were at the time, it is true, but even in America with its unlimited possibilities the Jews have not succeeded in penetrating into the central spheres of industry (steel, iron, heavy industry, shipping), as was the case in Germany.
Their position in the intellectual life of the country was equally unique. In literature, they were represented by illustrious names. The theater was largely in their hands. The daily press, above all its internationally influential sector, was essentially owned by Jews or controlled by them. As paradoxical as this may sound today, after the Hitler era, I have no hesitation to say that hardly any section of the Jewish people has made such extensive use of the emancipation offered to them in the nineteenth century as the German Jews! In short, the history of the Jews in Germany from 1870 to 1933 is probably the most glorious rise that has ever been achieved by any branch of the Jewish people.
The majority of the German Jews were never fully assimilated and were much more Jewish than the Jews in other West European countries.“ (Feuerzeichen, Ingid Weckert, Tubingen 1981, p. 52-54, with reference to Nation Europa 10/1962, pp. 116-120)
„We became aware of the propaganda in your country about alleged cruelties against the Jews in Germany. We therefore consider it our duty, not only in our own interest as German patriots, but also for the sake of truth, to comment on these incidents. Mistreatment and excesses have indeed occurred, and we are far from glossing these over. But this is hardly avoidable in any kind of revolution. We attach great significance to the fact that the authorities where it was at all possible to interfere, have done so against outrages that have come to our knowledge. In all cases, these deeds were committed by irresponsible elements who kept in hiding. We know that the government and all leading authorities most strongly disapprove of the violations that occurred.
But we also feel that now is the time to move away from the irresponsible agitation on the part of so-called Jewish intellectuals living abroad. These men, most of whom never considered themselves German nationals, but pretended to be champions for those of their own faith, abandoned them at a critical time and fled the country. They lost, therefore, the right to speak out on German-Jewish affairs. The accusations which they are hurling from their safe hiding places, are injurious to German and German Jews; their reports are vastly exaggerated. We ask the U.S. Embassy to forward this letter to the U.S. without delay, and we are accepting full responsibility for its content. Since we know that a large-scale propaganda campaign is to be launched next Monday, we would appreciate if the American public be informed of this letter by that date [Of course we know that the Jewish owned American News Media did not so inform the American Public -- just another of the traitorous actions which they have repeated time after time over the years]...The atrocity propaganda is lying. The Originators are politically and economically motivated. The same Jewish writers who allow themselves to be misused for this purpose, used to scoff at us veterans in earlier years.“ (Feuerzeichen, Ingid Weckert, Tubingen 1981, p. 52-54, with reference to Nation Europa 10/1962 p. 7f)
„...Each of you, Jew and gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in the sacred war should do so now...“ (Samuel Untermeyer, a radio broadcast August 6, 1933)
ROBERTS, STEPHEN H. 20th century Australian historian. Though hostile on almost every point to National Socialism, his The House that Hitler Built does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany: „It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany. The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin, for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and they had made great inroads on the educational system.“
Wednesday, September 24, 2025
Jewish and Zionist Influence in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2009 to 2025)
by Karl Radl
On 1st October 2009 a new institution was created in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland which aped the constitutional structure of its one-time colony: the United States of America.
Interestingly there is a significant aspect to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (hereafter Supreme Court) that needs to be documented that is how jewish it has been and continues to be.
When the Supreme Court was first established on 1st October 2009 it had twelve justices which has continued to be the case since.
The original twelve justices were:
Nicholas Phillips, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers (President)
David Hope, Lord Hope of Craigshead (Deputy President)
Mark Saville, Lord Saville of Newdigate
Alan Rodger, Baron Rodger of Earlsferry
Robert Walker, Baron Walker of Gestingthorpe
Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond
Simon Brown, Baron Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood
Jonathan Mance, Baron Mance
Lawrence Collins, Baron Collins of Mapesbury
Brian Kerr, Baron Kerr of Tonaghmore
Tony Clarke, Baron Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony
John Dyson, Lord Dyson
Of these twelve justices, a whopping four were jewish: Nicholas Phillips (the President), (1) Simon Brown, (2) Lawrence Collins (3) and John Dyson. (4) In addition to this Brenda Hale was – and is – a big supporter of Israel and has even been a lecturer at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. (5)
Thus 33.3% of the members of the Supreme Court at its inception were jewish, while jews are 0.5% of the population of Britain, which illustrates they are represented at roughly 66 times their relative representation on the original Supreme Court.
If we add in Hale – as known supporter of jewish and Israeli interests – then we get 41.6% of the members of the Supreme Court are known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests, which is pretty scary: isn’t it?
If we look at the current Supreme Court as of September 2024, we have the following justices:
Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir (President)
Patrick Hodge, Lord Hodge (Deputy President)
David Lloyd Jones, Lord Lloyd-Jones
Michael Briggs, Lord Briggs of Westbourne
Philip Sales, Lord Sales
Nicholas Hamblen, Lord Hamblen of Kersey
George Leggatt, Lord Leggatt
Andrew Burrows, Lord Burrows
Ben Stephens, Lord Stephens of Creevyloughgare
Vivien Rose, Lady Rose of Colmworth
David Richards, Lord Richards of Camberwell
Ingrid Simler, Lady Simler
Of these twelve justices, two are still jewish: Vivien Rose (6) and Ingrid Simler. (7) In additional to this Andrew Burrows is a big supporter of Israel and guest lectures at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem on occasion, (8) while Patrick Hodge is also a confirmed Christian philo-Semite and proponent of a ‘Judeo-Christian’ alliance (with Christians firmly as the subservient partner in that relationship). (9)
Thus 20% of the current members of the Supreme Court are jewish, while jews are 0.5% of the population of Britain, which illustrates they are represented at roughly 40 times their relative representation on the current Supreme Court.
If we add in Andrew Burrows and Patrick Hodge – as known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests – then we get 33.3% of the members of the Supreme Court are known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests, which is also pretty scary: isn’t it?
If take the Supreme Court over its entire existence from October 2009 to present (September 2025) then it has had the following members:
Nicholas Phillips, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers (1st October 2009 to 30th September 2012)
David Hope, Lord Hope of Craigshead (1st October 2009 to 26th June 2013)
Mark Saville, Lord Saville of Newdigate (1st October 2009 to 30th September 2010)
Alan Rodger, Baron Rodger of Earlsferry (1st October 2009 to 26th June 2011)
Robert Walker, Baron Walker of Gestingthorpe (1st October 2009 to 17th March 2013)
Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond (1st October 2009 to 10th January 2020)
Simon Brown, Baron Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood – (1st October 2009 to 9th April 2012)
Jonathan Mance, Baron Mance (1st October 2009 to 6th June 2018)
Lawrence Collins, Baron Collins of Mapesbury (1st October 2009 to 7th May 2011)
Brian Kerr, Baron Kerr of Tonaghmore (1st October 2009 to 30th September 2020)
Tony Clarke, Baron Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony (1st October 2009 to 30th September 2017)
John Dyson, Lord Dyson (1st October 2009 to 1st October 2012)
Nicholas Wilson, Lord Wilson of Culworth (26th May 2011 to 9th May 2020)
Jonathan Sumption, Lord Sumption (11th January 2012 to 9th December 2018)
Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir (6th February 2012 to Present)
Robert Carnwath, Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill (17th April 2020 to 15th March 2020)
David Neuberger, Baron Neuberger of Abbotsbury (1st October 2012 to 4th September 2017)
Anthony Hughes, Lord Hughes of Ombersley (9th April 2013 to 11th August 2018)
Roger Toulson, Lord Toulson (9th April 2013 to 22nd September 2016)
Patrick Hodge, Lord Hodge (1st October 2013 to Present)
Jill Black, Lady Black of Derwent (2nd October 2017 to 10th January 2021)
David Lloyd Jones, Lord Lloyd-Jones (2nd October 2017 to 13th January 2020 then 30th August 2020 to Present)
Michael Briggs, Lord Briggs of Westbourne (2nd October 2017 to Present)
Mary Arden, Lady Arden of Heswall (1st October 2018 to 24th January 2022)
David Kitchin, Lord Kitchin (1st October 2018 to 29th September 2023)
Philip Sales, Lord Sales (11th January 2109 to Present)
Nicholas Hamblen, Lord Hamblen of Kersey (13th January 2020 to Present)
George Leggatt, Lord Leggatt (21st April to Present)
Andrew Burrows, Lord Burrows (2nd June 2020 to Present)
Ben Stephens, Lord Stephens of Creevyloughgare (1st October 2020 to Present)
Vivien Rose, Lady Rose of Colmworth (13th April 2021 to Present)
David Richards, Lord Richards of Camberwell (3rd October 2022 to Present)
Ingrid Simler, Lady Simler (14th November 2023 to Present)
Of these seven out of a total 47 Supreme Court justices were/are jewish: Nicholas Phillips, Simon Brown, Lawrence Collins, John Dyson, David Neuberger, (10) Rose and Simler, while Brenda Hale, Patrick Hodge and Andrew Burrows are strongly supportive of jewish and/or Israeli interests.
Thus 14.9% of all members of the Supreme Court have been jewish, while jews are 0.5% of the population of Britain, which illustrates they are represented at roughly 30 times their relative representation on the current Supreme Court.
If we add in Hale, Hodge and Burrows – as known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests – then we get 25.5% of the members of the Supreme Court are known supporters of jewish and Israeli interests, which is rather frightening: isn’t it?
Thanks for reading Semitic Controversies! This post is public so feel free to share it.
References
(1) https://www.thejc.com/how-jewish-is-lord-chief-justice-phillips-n30w2gn8
(2) https://www.thejc.com/news/obituary-lord-brown-of-eaton-under-heywood-dz4xbotw
(4) https://www.jewishrenaissance.org.uk/blog/john-dyson
(6) https://www.thejc.com/news/lady-justice-rose-to-join-supreme-court-p08pa604
(7) https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/uk-supreme-court-female-judge-lady-justice-simler-rrf3mtxb9
(8) https://www.bfhu.org/product/lecture-by-lord-andrew-burrows/
(10) https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/desert-island-books-lord-david-neuberger/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)