Sunday, November 30, 2025
Thursday, November 27, 2025
Jews and Christianity – Part I
Part I
„There is no doubt that the... Jews aided the Persians with all the men they could muster, and that the help they gave was considerable. Once Jerusalem was in Persian hands a terrible massacre of Christians took place, and the Jews are accused of having taken the lead in this massacre.“ (A History of Palestine from 135 A.D. to Modern Times, James Parkes, p. 81; The Iron Curtain Over America, John Beaty, p. 194).
„Christianity, therefore is unhistoric and unmoral.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 121).
„The Jews were now free to indulge in their most fervent fantasies of mass murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and left hanging until they died of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death. Christian mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their arms. A red Jewish terrorist would take the baby, hold it by the feet, head downward and demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he would toss the baby into the air, and another member of the mob would rush forward and catch it on the tip of his bayonet.
Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies. There were many places of public execution in Russia during the days of the revolution, one of which was described by the American Rohrbach Commission: ‘The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls were bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters wide by 25 centimeters deep and about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood.
Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out, the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate.’„ (Defender Magazine, October 1933).
„The time will come when all Christians will become mature, they will all embrace Judaism, and they will all justify themselves by deeds. Then the Christians will become Jews.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 174).
„With deep insight into history Jesus foresaw what would happen to the Christians, that they would waste the treasure with harlots, but in due time the Christians will come back to Jehovah, and Jehovah will be glad to receive them.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p 176).
„A rabbi cannot teach you your Christian duty to the Jewish people.“
„Jewish Rabbis Should Not Teach Christians; in the ecumenical mania that grips the churches, Judeophiles especially are scurrying about trying to outdo one another in inviting Jewish speakers to their pulpits. It’s almost a fetish. While darkly contemplating this prima facie evidence of blissful ignorance, a refreshing breath of oxygen floated across this writer’s desk. It came from an unexpected, therefore a more greatly appreciated, source. The headline of the newsletter asked this question: ‘Should your Church Invite the Rabbi? In the center of the front page the box below appeared:
The newsletter was from Jews for Jesus. The article was written by Moishe Rosen, founder of Jews for Jesus. Although the organization is operated by ‘Jewish Christians’ some of whom are probably Zionists, Mr. Rosen did a good job in advising churches that they should not invite rabbis to teach them. In response to a woman whose church had invited a rabbi, he stated: ‘...I will first say that I am very pleased that your church cares about the Jewish people. I’m impressed that your minister has become friends with the local rabbi. As always, I appreciate any kindness to the Jewish people because I know how very much Jews need demonstrations of Christian kindness. Nevertheless, in all honesty, I’m chagrined that the rabbi was invited to speak at the church. He is a teacher who wants you to learn why he doesn’t believe in Jesus. He will tell you: ‘If you really respect the Jewish people, you must not proselytize or presume that we Jews need your religion.’ How could I be pleased about the church receiving that message?“
„Christianity does not concern itself about the material world its sole concern is immortality; it does not concern itself about conduct, its sole concern is faith.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 118).
„I am gong to show that real religious persecution is uniquely Jewish...In the time of Justinian, in the sixth century, the Jews massacred Christians in Caesarea and destroyed their churches. When Stephanus, the governor attempted to defend the Christians, the Jews fell on him and slew him. In 608 A.D., the Jews of Antioch fell upon their Christians neighbors and killed them with fire and sword...About 614 A.D., the Persians advanced upon Palestine and the Jews, after joining their standard, massacred the Christians and destroyed their churches. Ninety thousand Christians perished in Jerusalem alone.“ (The International Jew, Henry Ford (1922), pp. 171, 173; Who is Esau-Edom? Charles A. Weisman, p.100)
„This regenerated and true Christianity must identify itself with Marxism and Communism.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 124).
„Between the Christians and the Communists there is a life and death struggle because the Christians regard their idea of co-operation as being right, true and good, while the idea of co-operation of the Communists the Christians regard as wrong, false and evil.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 136).
„I shall use such influence as I have in emphasizing the basic truths common to all denominations, in lowering denominational barriers and in promoting effective cooperation among Christians of whatever creed.“ (John D. Rockefeller, The Messenger of the Covenant, December 1935 issue; And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin, p. 46).
On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, Elazar wrote: „For my Jewish brethren searching for a Biblical basis for sanctioning homosexuality, I provide you with words from Rabbis Marc Angel, Hillel Goldberg and Pinchas Stopler in their joint article published in the Winter, 1992-93 edition of Jewish Action Magazine;“ Well, here’s another viewpoint: Bible Review, December 1993, p. 11 DOES THE BIBLE PROHIBIT HOMOSEXUALITY? by Rabbi Jacob Milgrom: „The Biblical prohibition is addressed only to Israel. It is incorrect to apply it on a universal scale.
This past Yom Kippur, September 25, 1993, my synagogue invited me to explain the afternoon scriptural reading, the list of forbidden sexual liaisons in Leviticus 18. I chose to focus on what is today one of the most frequently quoted passages in the entire Bible, „Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman, it is an abomination“ (Leviticus 18:22).
What I said may be both good news and bad news to my Christian friends, depending on their position on gay and lesbian rights. This Biblical prohibition is addressed only to the Jews. Non-Jews are affected only if they reside in the Holy Land, but not elsewhere (see the closing exhortation in Leviticus 18, verses 24-30). Thus, it is incorrect to apply this prohibition on a universal scale.
But I spoke to my fellow Jews, who are required to observe this prohibition. What is the rationale for this prohibition? In a previous column, I noted that the Bible’s impurity rules are part of a symbol system representing the forces of life and death. Israel is required to avoid these impurities and adhere to the laws commanded by God, who promotes the forces of life. Thus in the same chapter we read, „You shall heed my statutes and my rules, by doing them one shall live“ (Leviticus 18:5). A man who discharges semen, whether intentionally or otherwise, is declared impure and must purify himself by bathing (a sort of re-baptism) before he is permitted to enter the Temple or touch sacred (sacrificial) food (Leviticus 15:16-18). Why? Because semen stands for life, and the loss of semen symbolizes the loss of life.
Note also that in the entire list of forbidden sexual unions, THERE IS NO PROHIBITION AGAINST LESBIANISM. Can it be that lesbianism did not exist in ancient times or that Scripture was unaware of its existence? Lesbians existed and flourished, as attested in an old (pre-Israelite)
Babylonian text and in the work of the lesbian poet Sappho (born c. 612 B.C.E., during the time of the First Temple), who came from the island of Lesbos (hence lesbianism). But there is a fundamental difference between the homosexual acts of men and women. IN LESBIANISM THERE IS NO SPILLING OF SEED. Thus life is not symbolically lost, and therefore lesbianism is not prohibited in the Bible.
My argument ostensibly can be countered by a more comprehensive biblical injunction. The very first commandment, given to Adam and repeated to Noah, is „Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth“ (Genesis 1:28 and Genesis 9:1,7). The descendants of Noah--the entire human race--are duty-bound to fulfill this commandment. But the truth is that we have not only filled the earth, we have over-filled it. This does not mean, however, that the commandment should be thought of as no longer in force--especially among Jews, who have lost a third of their members in our lifetime. I recall an incident during a premarital interview from the early years of my rabbinate. The starry-eyed bride declared her noble intention to have twelve children to compensate for the tragic loss of six million killed in the Holocaust. I gasped, „Must you do it all by yourself?“
I have since come to regret my flippant reply. This couple regarded their forthcoming marriage as a sacrament not just between themselves, but with the >Jewish people. The problem has worsened for American Jews. Because intermarriage is rife and the Jewish birth rate is low, American Jewry, once at zero population growth, has dipped into the minus column. Were it not for a steady stream of converts, the extinction of American Jewry would be even more imminent. For us the divine command, „Be fruitful and multiply“ is truly in force.
To Jewish homosexuals I offer an unoriginal solution. As compensation for your loss of seed, adopt children. Although adoption was practiced in the ancient world (as attested in Babylonian law), there is no Biblical procedure or institution of adoption. As a result the institution of adoption is absent from rabbinic jurisprudence. Yet there are isolated cases of a kind of pseudo-adoption in the Bible. For example, Abraham, long childless, complains to God that Eliezer of Damascus, his steward, will inherit him (Genesis 15:2). And barren Rachel beseeches her husband Jacob, „Here is my maid Bilhah--go into her that she may bear on my knees and that through her I too may have children“ (Genesis 30:3). Adoption is certainly a possibility today.
Lesbian couples have an additional advantage. Not only do they not violate biblical law, but through artificial insemination each can become the natural mother of her children.
Thus from the Bible we can infer the following: Lesbians, presumably half of the world’s homosexual population, are not mentioned. More than ninety-nine percent of the gays, namely non-Jews, are not addressed. This leaves the small number of male Jewish gays subject to this >prohibition. If they are biologically or psychologically incapable of procreation, adoption provides a solution. I hope the Eternal, in love and compassion, will then reckon their spilled seed as producing fruit. Jacob Milgrom.“ (Bible Review, a publication of the Biblical Archeology Society 3000 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington DC 20008, 202 387 8888
„The doctrines which the Jews had been spreading throughout the land for years could not but have helped to undermine the Church’s power.“ (Rabbi Lewis Browne, Stranger than Fiction, p. 222).
„Protestantism includes every type of religious thought and organization from ‘high church’ Anglicanism to high-principled Quakerism, from ecstatic Methodism to relentlessly intellectual Unitarism. Only slowly, and with many pangs is even Protestantism shaking off the religion about Christ.“ (Rabbi Lewis Browne, This Believing World, p. 300).
„Christianity has always looked on sex as in some way indecent and sinful; and for that reason Christians cannot possibly associate a truly religious nature ‘with an unsuppressed libido. But that is more than a prejudice.’„ (Rabbi Lewish Browne, This Believing World, p. 326).
„One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the Crucifixion of Christ. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I’d had charge of executing Christ, I’d have handled it differently. You see, what I’d have done was had him shipped to Rome and fed him to the lions. They could never have made a savior out of mincement!“ (Rabbi Ben Hecht)
The Rabbis of Judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo-Christian was relatively new, „There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian religion. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other.“ (National Jewish Information Service).
„It is useless to insist upon the differences which proceed from this opposition between the two different views in the respective attitudes of the pious Jew and the pious Christian regarding the acquisition of wealth. While the pious Christian, who had been guilty of usury, was tormented on his death-bed by the tortures of repentance and was ready to give up all that he owned, for the possessions unjustly acquired were scorching his soul, the pious Jews, at the end of his days looked with affection upon his coffers and chests filled to the top with the accumulated sequins taken during his long life from poor Christians and even from poor Moslems; a sight which could cause his impious heart to rejoice, for every penny of interest enclosed therein was like a sacrifice offered to his God.“ (Wierner Sombart, Les Juifs et la vie economique, p. 286; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 164)
„Our adversaries, numerous and formidable, will say, and will have the right to say, that our Principe Createur is identical with the Principe Gerateur of the Indians and Egyptians, and may fitly be symbolized as it was symbolized anciently, by the linage...To accept this in lieu of a personal God is to abandon Christianity and worship of Jehovah and return to wallow in the styles of Paganism.“ (Albert Pike, Supreme Council of the 33rd degree, New York, August 15, 1876).
„The Jew...is not content merely to destroy Christianity, but he preaches the gospel of Judaism; he not only assails the Catholic or the Protestant faith, but he incites to the unbelief, and then imposes on those whose faith he has undermined his own conception of the world, of morality and of life. He is engaged in his historic mission, the annihilation of the religion of Christ.“ (Benard Lazare, Antisemitism: It’s History and Causes, Translated by Britons Publishing Co., London (1967), p. 158).
„The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us give them enough of it! Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar! And let them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher.“ (Jewish Chairman of the American Communist Party, Gus Hall).
„Wars are the Jews harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100-million of them, and the end is not yet.“ (Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn).
„Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity.“ (The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918).
„We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people.“ (Rabbi Reichorn, in Le Contemporain, July 1st, 1880)
„Dear beloved brethren in Moses: We have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as yourselves. The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following: As for what you say that the King of France obliges you to become Christians: do it; since you cannot do otherwise...As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your goods make your sons merchants, that little by little they may despoil the Christians of theirs. As for what you say about their attempts on your lives; make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christian lives. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues; make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that you sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix themselves up with the affairs of State, in order that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.“ (Constantinople Elders of Jewry).
„The confusion of the average Christian comes from the action of the clergy. Confusion creates doubt! Doubt brings loss of confidence! Loss of confidence brings loss of interest! There need be no confusion in the minds of Christians concerning the fundamentals of the faith. It would not exist of the clergy were not ‘aiding and abetting’ their worst enemies [Jews]. Many clergymen are their [Jews] allies, without realizing it, while other have become deliberate ‘male prostitutes’ to their cause.
When Christians see their leaders in retreat which can only bring defeat they are confused and afraid. To stop this surrender, the clergy must make an about face immediately and take a stand against the invisible and intangible ideological war which is subversively being waged against the Christian faith.“ (Facts Are Facts, Dr. Benjamin Freedman who was born a Jew and died a Christian).
„The strongest supporters of Judaism cannot deny that Judaism is anti-Christian.“ (Jewish World, March 15, 1924)
„I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish.“ (Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, p. 32, January 18, 1972)
The Rabbis of Judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo-Christian was relatively new, „There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian religion. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other.“ (National Jewish Information Service, 6412 W. Olympic Blvd. L.A. CA).
„The current expression ‘Judeo-Christian’ is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men’s mind, if by it one is meant to understand the Jewish origin of Christianity; for by abolishing the fundamental distinctions between Jewish and Christian messianism, it seeks to bring together two ideas that are radically in opposition. By laying the accent exclusively on the ‘Christian’ idea to the detriment of the ‘Judean’ it conjures away monotheistic messianism - a valuable discipline at all levels of thought, and reduces it to a purely confessional messianism, preoccupied like Christian messianism with the salvation of the individual soul. If the term ‘Judeo-Christian’ does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea.
It is based on a ‘contrdictio in adjecto’ which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath two ideas which are completely irreconcilable, it seeks to demonstrate that there is no difference between day and night or hot and cold or Black and White, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavoring to construct a civilization. Christianity offers to the world a limited messianism which it wishes to impose as the only valid one...Even Spinoza, who was further than any other thinker from the historic messianism of Israel, wrote: ‘As for what certain churches say, that God assumed human nature, I must confess that this seems to me as absurd as saying that a circle assumed the shape of a square...’
The dogmatic exclusiveness professed by Christianity must finally end...It is the obstinate Christian claim to be the sole heir to Israel which propagates-anti-Semitism. This scandal must terminate sooner or later; the sooner it goes, the sooner the world will be rid of the issue of lies in which anti-Semitism shrouds itself.“ (Joshua Jehouda, l’Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde, pp. 135-136; Judaism and the Vatican, Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 30-31).
„A Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A Free thinker and Atheist always remains a Jew.“ (Jewish World, London December 14, 1922)
„A Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A Free thinker and Atheist always remains a Jew.“ (Jewish World, London December 14, 1922)
„The inward thought of Moscow (the Jews) indeed appears to be that for twenty centuries while humanity has been following Christ, it has been on the wrong word. It is now high time to correct this error of direction by creating a new moral code, a new civilization, founded on quite different principles (Talmudic Principles). And it appears that it is this idea which the communist leaders wished to symbolize when a few months ago they proposed to erect in Moscow a Statue to Judas Iscariot, to Judas, this great honest misunderstood man, who hanged himself, not at all, as it is usually and foolishly believed, because of remorse for having sold his master, but because of despair, poor man, at the thought that humanity would pay for by innumerable misfortunes the wrong path which it was about to follow.“ (J. and J. Tharaud, Causerie sur Israel, p. 38; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 143-144)
Monday, November 24, 2025
Healthcare In Auschwitz
Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/healthcare-in-auschwitz/
According to jews the camps were being used as human extermination centers, but all possible evidence goes contrary to their epic lies.
From the end of March 1942, the economic aspect of detention in National Socialist concentration camps began to prevail over the strictly “re-educative.” On March 31, 1942 SS Brigadeführer Richard Glücks, head of Amtsgruppe D – Konzentrationslager (Office Group D – Concentration camps) of newly-formed SS Wirtschafts-Verwaltungshauptamt, sent commandants of all the concentration camps a letter in which they were informed:
“By order of the Reichsführer SS, in a number of camps work is being carried out inside these preventive detention camps on behalf of the arms industry. These works are of military importance and therefore particularly urgent. With newly-arrived inmates, I must first fill these camps; then, according to the level of urgency, the needs of other camps will be met.”
These new tasks of importance to the war required safeguarding of inmate labor. On December 15, 1942, Himmler, concerned about the high mortality of inmates in concentration camps, wrote the following letter to the head of the SS WVHA:
“Dear Pohl, re our conversation in Hegewaldheim. In 1943, seek to acquire to a maximum extent for the inmates’ sustenance raw vegetables and onions. During the vegetable season, distribute large quantities of carrots, kohlrabi, turnips and as many other similar vegetables as are available, and store a sufficient quantity for the inmates in winter, so that inmates can receive a satisfactory amount of them every day. I believe that in this way we will significantly improve [their] state of health. Heil Hitler. Yours, Himmler.”
Other measures concerned the improvement of winter clothing, the shorter duration of roll calls, the right to receive food parcels, and a cookery class in Dachau for inmate cooks.
On December 28, 1942, Himmler ordered concentration camp inmate mortality to be reduced at any cost. As a result of these measures taken by Himmler, in the first half of 1943 deaths in concentration camps dropped significantly. On October 26, 1943 SS Gruppenführer Oswald Pohl, head of the SS WVHA, issued an important directive that concerned the improvement of inmates’ living conditions. Reproduced is ‘part of’ the full text of this directive, which was sent to the commandants of 19 concentration camps, including Auschwitz:
“Within the framework of German war production, thanks to the construction work carried out during the past two years, concentration camps represent a factor of decisive strategic importance. We have created from nothing armaments factories that have no equal. Now we must act with all forces at our disposal so that the achievements realized so far are not only maintained, but furthermore steadily increased in the future.”
1) Food
I have pointed out already multiple times the need for correct and appropriate food for inmates. I remind you of the following principles:
1. Store vegetables and potatoes in such a way as to minimize loss of stock. First-class storage facilities.
2. When cleaning potatoes and vegetables, keep waste to the lowest level possible. Constantly monitor peeler teams.
3. Wash potatoes as briefly as possible; do not leave them in running water for hours. If soaking in water is unavoidable, keep them just covered with water, whole and not broken. Distribute boiled potatoes as far as possible in their skins.
4. Shortly before distributing rations, mix 10-50% of all vegetables raw with the cooked food.
5. Stir into the food about 10% of raw grated potato.
6. Only throw away vegetable cooking water when it has a bad smell or taste.
7. Distribute vegetables alongside meals also raw as salad, or uncooked (carrots, sauerkraut). The collection of wild greens and herbs must be done with great care as before.
8. Do not overcook warm meals!
9. The amount of the lunch ration should be between a liter and a quarter and a liter and a half, yet not a watery soup, but a substantial dish, rich in content.
10. The cooks must turn their attention mainly to proper seasoning. No excessive amounts of salt, in general no more than 20-30 grams per day. The supply of spices, to the extent that they are not rationed, should be implemented vigorously.
11. Inmate cooks must be supervised constantly and replaced immediately in case of negligence in the service.
12. In contrast to cooking for soldiers, in cooking for inmates, food must be chopped and cooked together. Only workers involved in heavy labor are to receive in their hands their additional sausage ration.
13. All possibilities of providing additional food must be fully exploited (e.g. yeast, curd).
14. In the concentration camps there must be no waste food.
15. Hot food and drinks must be given and consumed hot.
16. Bread may not be ovenfresh. Where possible, distribute bread in whole loaves.
17. Great attention must be given to distribution of the food in equal shares. An inmate who receives food late through no fault of his own is entitled to the same amount as those who ate before him. Portions of surplus food must be distributed equally or equitably in turn.
18. Inmates are to be encouraged to carefully peel potatoes boiled in their skins.
19. The receipt of additional packages is to be encouraged. Eating and digesting well require peace and quiet. Therefore, sufficient time off when food is received. No unnecessary walking: take the food to the people, not the people to the food.
Do not burden meal breaks with other tasks.
1. In the kitchens, living quarters and food receptacles there must be maximum cleanliness.
2. If a patient can recover faster with a special diet, it must be provided for him, but only in the infirmaries.
2) Clothing
Clothing, along with hot meals, has the task of keeping the body warm and of protecting it from the common cold. This is of particular importance for inmates working outdoors. I order that in winter, where these are available, hats, coats, woolen cuffs and socks be worn. Several light garments keep one warmer than one heavy garment, so in the winter, if a coat is not available, wearing two shirts or similar must be allowed. Newspaper is an effective protection against the cold (because it keeps in the heat). Therefore, if necessary, have several layers of newspaper worn on the chest, belly and kidney area. You must give attention to procuring a sufficient amount of paper. If need be, inmates may make their own paper waistcoats. Shredded paper in socks is also a good protection against the cold. If no hat is available, allow close-fitting paper caps to be made as well. In this case, hair may be kept long as well to retain heat. I will reward suitable designs of heat-retaining clothing of any kind.
3) Natural hygiene measures.
In winter, care must be taken that the inmates are not subjected to hypothermia. So in the case of outdoor work, have repeated short breaks for energetic body exercise. Make use of roll calls for warming-up exercise. Hot drinks and foods promote blood circulation and warm the body from the inside. Always distribute cold food together with a hot drink. Bedding should not be allowed to cool; therefore, in unheated barracks during the day, put blankets on straw mattresses. Constantly check that straw mattresses are properly filled. You must provide an undisturbed night’s rest of at least 7 to 8 hours. Inmates who work during the day in dark areas, if possible, should be exposed during the lunch break to the light of day with a naked torso.
4) Avoid unnecessary exertion
Roll calls should be as short as possible; long periods of standing must be avoided. If it is cold, allow short exercises stamping the feet; if the weather is fine, have them sit [on the ground]. As far as possible organize workplaces with regard to layout and lighting so that all resources available work to the advantage of the labor process. In the future, useful and easily-achievable proposals made by the inmates in this regard will be rewarded (facilitations, cigarettes).
Treatment of Registered Prisoners Unfit for Work
In all preserved documents on the camp population of Auschwitz from 1942 to 1945, a very high number of “Prisoners unfit for work or deployment” is consistently to be seen. The legal status of these prisoners was established by the WVHA as early as 1942. On June 24 of that year, the head of Agency DII, SS Obersturmbannführer Gerhard Maurer, sent the commandants of the concentration camps new instructions for the submission of reports on the utilization of prisoners for work. Under Point 1 it stated:
“Prisoners unfit for work or deployment. These are to be listed in the daily reports under ‘Remarks’ in the following order:
Sick a) outpatients b) inpatients
1. Invalids
2. Outpatients
3. Under interrogation
4. Released
5. limited fitness
6. Arrest
7. Quarantined
8. Admissions.
As we shall see, these categories appeared regularly in various forms in reports from the year 1944, of which a number of examples have been preserved. These are the “Summary of Number and Utilization of Prisoners in Auschwitz II Concentration Camp.” On September 22, 1942, Auschwitz Camp held 28,207 prisoners, of which 16,459 were men and 11,748 women; 5,481 (19.4%) of the inmates were “Unfit for work and not deployable.” According to a report by the camp in December 1, 1942, 22,391 prisoners were in the men’s camp, including 1,620 patients in the Auschwitz Sickbay and 4,719 patients in the Birkenau Sickbay, in all therefore 6,339 patients, or 28.3% of the inmates. For 1943, the preserved documents enable us to derive the following more complete picture of the situation.
On September 4, 1943 SS Obersturmbannführer Gerhard Maurer, head of Agency DII of the WVHA (Prisoner Deployment), wrote the following letter to Höß:
“There are at this time about 25,000 jewish prisoners in CC Auschwitz. On Aug. 25, I told SS Hauptsturmführer Schwarz that I must know the number of fully work- and deployment-capable jews, because I had in mind to transfer jews from the concentration camp in order to put them to work in the Reich in arms production. I renewed this inquiry by teletype on Aug. 26, 1943. According to the reply teletype message of Aug. 29, 1943 of the 25,000 jews in custody, only 3,581 are fit for labor. These, however, are in constant utilization in arms production and cannot be given up. What are the other 21,500 jews doing? Something here doesn’t add up! Please review this situation once more and report back to me.”
Since the number of prisoners in Birkenau who were unfit for labor or deployment in June 1943 lay at about 34% of the total camp population, the number mentioned by Maurer was probably correct: of the 25,000 jews in Auschwitz at the end of August 1943, only about 3,581 were fit for labor, from which follows that about 21,400 were unfit for labor.
Saturday, November 22, 2025
Thursday, November 20, 2025
The Coming of the New Elites
Source: American Dissident Voices broadcast, September 12th 1998
by Dr. William L. Pierce
I really appreciate the letters I’ve been receiving from listeners. Since we don’t have anything like Nielsen ratings to judge how many people are listening to our broadcasts, I judge our popularity by the volume of mail that comes in. As long as that volume continues to grow, I’m happy in the knowledge that the number of people listening to our broadcasts is growing. More than that, I’m happy to know that people are not just listening, but they are responding. Because the consistent theme of all of my programs has been that people must stop being mere spectators and must become participants. They must begin speaking out.
Although most of my mail is very positive, I also receive a few hate letters, but I also appreciate these. They tell me things about the mentality of America’s enemies. I’m not talking about the occasional letter from a spiteful Jew, in which he tells me how much he hates me, or from a Black nationalist, in which his message is essentially, “Die, White dog! We people of color will destroy you, and then we will inherit the earth.” The really interesting hate mail is from the self-hating Whites, who tell me that I am evil for speaking up on behalf of my own race. In particular, I received several letters from these sick, pitiful people after my broadcast two weeks ago on the murders of those two White girls in Fayetteville, North Carolina, by members of a Black gang, the Crips, in an initiation ritual.
You know, I’m not a psychiatrist, although there are times when I wish I were, so that I could better understand people like those who send me these hate letters. I think it’s important to understand them because there are many more of our people out there suffering from the same sickness. I mentioned in an earlier broadcast that when Bill Clinton has traveled around the country speaking to groups of students and faculty about his vision of a non-White America in the next century, he has been applauded. Audiences which are mostly White have cheered Clinton when he boasted that the government’s immigration policies are leading to a deliberate darkening of America. Sometimes I have been tempted to explain this reaction as simply another manifestation of the lemming phenomenon – which is to say, most people have no real opinions of their own and will applaud whatever other people are applauding: whatever they think they’re expected to applaud. And in fact, I am sure that in most cases that’s what it is: simply a mindless reflex by people whose primary concern is to be fashionable.
But some of the letters which I have received in response to my broadcast on the Fayetteville murders indicate something darker and more twisted in the minds of the writers. What I detect is a sort of anguish, a sort of, “Oh, no, you shouldn’t tell anybody about that! It’s terrible for you to report on things like that!” And they think it’s terrible not because two young White women were brutally murdered, but because news of their murders may make some people more hesitant to associate with Blacks, more hesitant to tolerate the growing presence of Black gangs in their communities. It is terrible to them because it is news which doesn’t fit the party line that Blacks are always the innocent victims of White oppression and injustice. And it is terrible because it may hinder the great plan to elevate the Blacks and the other downtrodden and oppressed races and make everyone truly equal. And of course, the only way to do that is to get rid of the White majority, because Whites have a tendency to oppress others, and they will oppress others as long as it is physically possible for them to do so.
As I said, I’m not a psychiatrist, and so I don’t really know why some people think like that. Probably in some cases it’s the consequence of Christian teaching: the lion will lie down with the lamb, the last will be first and the first will be last, and so on. Sometimes these notions are pumped into the heads of small children, and even when they grow up and have a chance to experience the real world, even when they no longer think of themselves as religious, they are unable to shed these early notions. Even though they can see that equality does not exist in the world, they still believe that it should.
And probably there are others who have even darker and more twisted motives for not wanting the news of the Fayetteville murders to get out. For them personally it is gratifying to learn that Blacks have murdered White girls. They see it as a just punishment for our racial guilt. But, as I said, they don’t want such news to get out and alarm other White people and perhaps lead Whites generally to take protective measures which will avert further well deserved punishment.
These are the same type of people who believe that I am a high school dropout, have bad teeth, and live in a trailer park with discarded mattresses and appliances in my front yard. In fact, I hear these comments about bad teeth and trailer parks so often that I suspect that the kids are being taught such things in high school these days. They’re being taught that Politically Incorrect dissidents are low-class people who are chronic failures and want to keep Blacks down so that we’ll have someone to look down on. They believe that when I criticize the role of Jews in our society I do so because I am envious of the Jews’ financial success. And while some of the people who make these remarks to me about my bad teeth and my trailer home and my general failure as a human being seem to be pretty uptight – that is, it seems to me that they have some sort of emotional need to believe these things of me – others really are quite smug in their ignorance. I suspect that the smug ones are mostly just lemmings mindlessly parroting what they’ve been taught, and the uptight ones are those with some sort of religious motivation for their hatred.
I never argue with these people, because it’s clear that they’re not susceptible to reason. They believe what they do because they have a need to believe it. I think I could straighten out the thinking of most of them with a piece of two by four or an oak table leg applied smartly about the head and shoulders twice a day for a month or so while keeping them on a diet of a couple of hundred calories a day – you know, the way we straightened out the thinking of the conquered Germans after the Second World War – but not by debating them.
Really, it’s only a small minority of the American population that is capable of any sort of independent thinking at all. Most people are so tightly bound by either the need to conform or by religious or quasi-religious hang-ups that they just aren’t able to accept any idea or even any fact which is contrary to what they see on television. And that’s too bad for them, because only those individuals who are able to accept evidence and to think clearly about it can prepare themselves for the enormous changes which are coming in our society. Only this thinking minority will be survivors; the rest will be victims.
And indeed, great changes are coming. The twentieth century has been the democratic century, the era of egalitarianism, the age of the mass man. The next century – indeed, the next millennium – will be the era of the self-conscious elites. Which is not to say that everyone will be self-conscious or that everyone will belong to an elite. But the people who determine the course of events will. Of course, in a sense that has been the case in this century too. The Jews certainly are a self-conscious elite, and they certainly have had a dominant influence in this century, primarily through their control of the mass media. But they have had to keep their dominance concealed from most people. They have had to rule through deceit and subversion. In the next century the rule of the elites will be much more open. The pretense of democracy and equality will be dropped.
The pretense already has become so transparent that even some of the lemmings are beginning to be disturbed by what is being revealed. America, the greatest champion of democracy, the great powerhouse which has gone about the horribly bloody and destructive business of making the world safe for democracy during most of this century, has a government which currently is the laughingstock of the world. And this is not solely because of Mr. Clinton’s inability to keep his zipper up. Clinton, after all, did not get into the White House despite the system. He got into the White House because of the system. He got in because the system is designed for people like him: for clever liars, for skillful actors. It is designed so that the smoothest liars, the liars who can act most convincingly for the television cameras are the ones who succeed in it. It is designed to weed out anyone with principles or patriotism and keep such people away from public office. Clinton – or someone else with an equally embarrassing problem – was inevitable.
And as every other politician scrambles now to distance himself from Clinton and to persuade the public that everything will be A-OK if the public will just vote for him instead in the next election – as the politicians assure the public that Clinton is simply a terrible mistake, a fluke, who somehow slipped through the system and that the system itself is still in good shape, even some of the slow thinkers in the electorate are becoming a bit disillusioned about the system itself. Even the slow thinkers are beginning to suspect that all of the politicians who now, finally, are claiming to be shocked by Clinton’s deceit, by Clinton’s bald-faced lies, and are distancing themselves from him, really understood what sort of liar Clinton was all along and only stopped supporting him when it became obvious that there was no chance at all for him to wriggle out of the mess he has gotten himself into – and of course, after they were given the go-ahead last week by Clinton’s former number-one Jewish booster, Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman. Even the slow thinkers are beginning to understand that even the politicians who themselves have managed to remain untainted by personal scandal, even the politicians who never have been caught with their drawers down or their hands in the cash drawer, are perfectly willing to tolerate a Clinton, so long as the voters don’t find out what’s going on. And the brightest observers of the Clinton spectacle have understood that the system itself will not endure much longer. The most sophisticated observers have understood that a system so seriously flawed – a system whose flaws have been so glaringly exposed – will be replaced by something different before much more time has passed.
The situation in Russia now presents a striking and persuasive lesson for us in this regard. While the Russian people starve, while Russian workers go unpaid and the shelves of Russian stores remain bare, Jewish billionaires who have sucked the last drop of blood out of Russia scurry to stash their billions in Swiss bank accounts, and at the same time their Jewish brethren in the West tighten the screws on the same Swiss banks in the most arrogant extortion racket the world has ever seen. Even the slow thinkers in the West who are observing these developments must suspect that the system in Russia will not last much longer. They must suspect that it will be replaced by something different very soon.
More sophisticated observers of the Russian situation see a bit more. They see the likelihood that more than 80 years of exploitation of the Russian people by the Jews will come to an end soon. This exploitation endured while it was concealed from the public, first under the pretense of a “dictatorship of the proletariat” and then under the pretense of a democracy. But it was, in fact, exploitation of the Russian people first by Jewish commissars under a Marxist system and then exploitation by Jewish capitalists under a media-controlled democratic system. The facts of this exploitation were obscured by the Jewish media bosses in the West for a long time, but – like Mr. Clinton’s lies – the facts have become too obvious to conceal any longer. Boris Abramovich Berezovsky and Vladimir Gusinsky and all the rest of the Jewish billionaires controlling Boris Yeltsin simply have become too obvious, too visible. The fact that they literally stole Russia and that they stole Russia with the connivance of other Jews inside the communist system as that system was being dismantled, simply cannot be concealed any longer.
Berezovsky seems to enjoy the spotlight at the moment, and he is publicly throwing his weight around now and announcing his willingness to back certain Russian politicians, while the Russian people themselves are becoming increasingly exasperated by the spectacle of a handful of rich Jewish gangsters deciding how Russia is to be run while the Russians starve. I cannot predict in detail how the Russian situation will develop, of course, but I think it quite likely that we will see an end to Jewish power in Russia before we achieve that goal in the United States, and I also think it likely that the new rulers of Russia, the new self-conscious elite which comes to the fore there as the present crisis plays itself out, actually will be Russians for a change, and they will rule without the pretense of democracy.
And if Russia succeeds in liberating itself from Jewish control, there may be similar developments in the rest of eastern Europe, where just a few years ago communist butchers were permitted to switch hats, declare themselves democrats, and continue ruling. Pressure from Washington played a big role in preventing the people of these other countries from taking vengeance on their former communist bosses. By substantially diminishing the prestige of the U.S. government, inadvertent though that was, Bill Clinton may have done the people of Russia and perhaps also the other countries of eastern Europe a big favor. Vengeance may yet be taken. This possibility has not escaped the attention of the Jews themselves, and their publications in this country already are full of yammering and whining about how they’re being “scapegoated” again, poor dears.
Be that as it may, this era of sham and deceit and pretense, this era of democracy and politicians and rule by the Jewish media, is drawing to a close. The politicians don’t understand that; they think that we’re just seeing another blip on the graph. The couch potatoes certainly don’t understand it. Even the “wise guys,” most of the media commentators and the academics and the business tycoons, don’t understand that it won’t be just business as usual during the next century, with the Jewish media bosses molding public opinion to suit themselves, and the same old political shell game presenting clever liars and skillful actors to the voters to choose from. That racket has been too thoroughly exposed.
It takes more than a mass of credulous couch potatoes and a few clever Jewish media bosses to keep the present system going. It also takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to let themselves be governed by the system. In the past most of these people had pretty fuzzy notions of what was going on. They accepted the concept of democracy because that was fashionable. It was easier to accept it than to make a real effort to analyze its dynamics. But Bill Clinton, with his Jewish bimbo and his cigar tricks, has given us such a stark illustration of the way the system really works, that it will be very difficult for everyone to go back to swallowing the same old platitudes and clichés again. Of course, the people who believe that all dissidents have bad teeth and live in trailer parks will continue to believe whatever they’re told. And the academics and commentators who are slaves to fashion will continue to try their best to be fashionable.
But the number of those who have been permanently disillusioned has reached a point, I believe, where they will begin to have a growing influence on the course of events. They will have a growing influence on the thinking of those able to think for themselves. And from these people eventually will come a new elite of men who are idealistic and yet hardheaded, of men who will understand that the ground is shifting under the feet of the old elite and that something new and different must emerge from the changes now taking place around the world. And they will understand that now is the time, not later, to begin positioning themselves to be survivors rather than victims.
The second-raters will continue mouthing the old clichés and may even still believe the old baloney about democracy and equality, but the select few – the precursors of the elite of the 21st century – will free their minds from all of the old cobwebs and will see the future with much clearer eyes than the second-raters. They will see the Jews for what they are, and they will choose not to serve them or even to tolerate them. They will think thoughts that the second-raters are afraid to think. They will, for the sake of example, be able to compare Bill Clinton and his works, on the one hand, with Timothy McVeigh and the slaughter of 168 innocents in Oklahoma City, on the other hand, and they will understand whose deeds have in reality caused the greater amount of death and destruction; they will understand which of the two is the greater criminal, which of these two opponents has acted from worse motives.
And they will understand many other things. While rejecting the lie of egalitarianism and the pretense of democracy, they will understand that the new elite cannot stand on nothing, that it must stand on a strong base, and that base will be their racial community. Only the bonds of blood, of race, will be strong enough to hold in the chaos which is coming. In the struggle ahead only those who struggle for something beyond their own enrichment or personal power will have lasting success. They must be part of a strong group, and they must struggle for group interests as well as their own. The new age will be an age of nationalism, and only those who speak and act for their people will be able to lead in the coming age. But it will be an age in which the actors, in which the clever liars, will have short shrift, because it will no longer be masses of couch potatoes who will be asked to believe the liars, but instead hardheaded men who will not be so easily deceived and who will not feel the need to wear a mask of pretense themselves. They will rule because they are strong and able and have clear minds and actually work to advance the interests of their people.
Perhaps my way of stating that sounds naive and excessively idealistic in this age of lies and corruption and rule by deceit, but that’s really the way it will be. Things really are beginning to change. The age of the Jew is coming to an end. And the clear thinkers will be the first to begin acting on that.
* * *









