Germany Awakens – A Document of the Rebirth of Germany (1933)
The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Friday, January 30, 2026
Tuesday, January 27, 2026
Characterizations of the Jews
„You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them.“ („Juif,“ Dictionnaire Philosophique)
„I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These marranos go wherever there is money to be made...But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.“ (Letter to Jean-Baptiste Nicolas de Lisle de Sales, December 15, 1773. Correspondance. 86:166)
„They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not someday become deadly to the human race.“ (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771)
„The customs of the Jews are base and abominable and owe their persistence to their depravity. Jews are extremely loyal to one another, always ready to show compassion, but towards every other people they feel only hate and enimity. As a race (the Jews are not a race, because they have mingled with the other races to the point that they are only a people, not a race), they are prone to lust; among themselves nothing is unlawful.“ (Roman Historian Tacitus).
„The Jews cannot be a part of a real national unity.“ (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 201).
„Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and to those around him. Ever since he has been scattered in your midst he has had to maintain a continuous struggle for the conservation of his identity.“ (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p.10)
„What virtues and what vices brought upon the Jew this universal enmity? Why was he in turn equally maltreated and hated by the Alexandrians and the Romans, by the Persians and the Arabs, by the Turks and by the Christian nation? Because everywhere and up to the present day the Jew was an unsociable being.
Why was he unsociable? Because he was exclusive, and his exclusiveness was at the same time political and religious or in other words, he kept to his political, religious cult and his law...This faith in their predestination, in their election, enveloped in the Jews an immense pride; they came to look upon non-Jews with contempt and often hatred, when patriotic reasons were added to theological ones.“ (L'AntisÇmitisme, (1894) Bernard Lazare; LÇon de Poncins, The Secret Powers behind Revolution, (1929)).
Then, concerning the persecution theme and host-alien relationship, Roth wrote: „Have not Jews been admitted from time immemorial, freely, kindly, almost happily by every nation at whose gate they have knocked for admittance...Have the Jews ever had to petition a country for admission - the first time? Read for yourself the story of the progress of Jewry through Europe and America. Wherever they come they are welcomed, permitted to settle down, and join in the general business of the community. But one by one the industries of the country close to them because of unfair practices (by the Jews towards Christians) until it no longer being possible to hold in check the wrath of a betrayed people, there is violence and, inevitably, an ignominious ejection of the whole race from the land. There is not a single instance when the Jews have not fully deserved the bitter fruit of the fury of their persecutors...Jewish history has been tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the neighboring nations who have suffered them. Our major vice of old, as of today, is parasitism. We are a people of vultures living on the labor (of the host nation) and the good nature of the rest of the world...We come to the nations pretending to escape persecution, we the most deadly persecutors in all the wretched annals of man.“ (Jews Must Live, Samuel Roth)
„The Jew is the instrument of Christian destruction. Look at them carefully in all their glory, playing God with other people’s money. The robber barons of old, at least, left something in their wake; a coal mine; a railroad; a bank. But the Jew leaves nothing. The Jew creates nothing, he builds nothing, he runs nothing. In their wake lies nothing but a blizzard of paper, to cover the pain. If he said, 'I know how to run your business better than you.' That would be something worth talking about. But he's not saying that. He's saying 'I'm going to kill you (your business) because at this moment in time, you are worth more dead than alive” (Quotations from the Movie, The Liquidator)
„The Jew is necessarily anti-Christian, by definition, in being a Jew, just as he is anti-Mohammedan, just as he is opposed to every principle which is not his own.
Now that the Jew has entered into society, he has become a source of disorder, and, like the mole, he is busily engaged in undermining the ancient foundations upon which rests the Christian State. And this accounts for the decline of nations, and their intellectual and moral decadence; they are like a human body which suffers from the intrusion of some foreign element which it cannot assimilate and the presence of which brings on convulsions and lasting disease. By his very presence the Jew acts as a solvent; he produces disorders, he destroys, he brings on the most fearful catastrophes.
The admission of the Jew into the body of the nations has proved fatal to them; they are doomed for having received him...The entrance of the Jew into society marked the destruction of the State, meaning by State, the Christian State.“ (Benard Lazare, Antisemitism, Its History and Causes, pages 318-320 and 328).
„It is not only this fervent 'Passionalism' which conditions the attitude of the Jews in the political and social order...They always experience the need to seek unity. Because of that they are sentimentally led to reject in a more or less absolute fashion all which is contradictory to this unity. For them, what is differentiation is an attack on the principle of unity; injustice and inequality are differentiations. They must be rejected or lessened...This is explained the Socialist and Communist tendencies of which they are reproached...It is in what is called business that the Jewish soul, by utilitarianism with which he is so strongly impregnated, finds a liberal career: commerce, trade, banks, finance, and industries. It is this same characteristic which in all times and in all places has brought upon the traditional Jew sarcasms and reprobation, often enough, let us recognize it, justified.“ (Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, (1929)).
„The perfect Semite (Jews are not Semites but are Khazars, descended from Japheth) is positive and impassioned. The two elements exercise a reciprocal influence, each moderating what is too excessive and therefore unlikely to live in the other, creating a being apart who easily arrives at domination, for nothing can stop such a man...It is the eternal opposition of Shylock and Jessica. It is the illogical and monstrous mixture of the rarest qualities with the most abject defects, mixture of irresistible force and of irremediable weakness.“ (Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, (1929), The Trail of the Serpent, Inquire Within, Miss Stoddard, p. 117).
„There is no race in the world more enigmatic, more fatal, and, therefore, more interesting than the Jews. Every writer who, like yourself, is oppressed by the aspect of the present and embarrassed by his anxieties for the future must try to elucidate the Jewish question and its bearing upon our age. For the question of the Jews and their influence on the world, past and present, cuts to the root of all things.“ (World Significance of the Russian Revolution, 1920, George Pitt-Rivers, by the Jew, Dr. Oscar Levy, The Trail of the Serpent, Inquire Within, Miss Stoddard, p. 91).
„The Jews cannot be classed as a 'race' per se, they are an ethnic group. '...the Jews form an ethnic group; that like all ethnic groups they have their own racial elements distributed in their own proportions; like all or most ethnic groups they have their 'look,' a part of their cultural heritage that both preserves and expresses their cultural solidarity...they have developed a special racial sub-type and a special pattern of facial and bodily expression.“ (Carleton S. Coon, The Races of Europe, The MacMillian Co., N.Y. (1939), p. 442).
„Take the particular trick of false names. It seems to us particularly odious. We think when we show our contempt for those who use this subterfuge that we are giving them no more than they deserve. It is a meanness which we associate with criminals and vagabonds; a piece of crawling and sneaking...Men whose race is universally known, will unblushingly adopt a false name as a mask, and after a year or two pretend to treat it as an insult if their original and true name be used in its place.“ (Hilaire Belloc, The Jew, pp. 100, 102).
„The fact is that the Jews were known only as destroyers in ancient history, not creators. They have developed no science, have produced no art, have built no great cities, and alone have no talent for the finer things of civilized life. The Jews claim to be the torchbearers of civilization, but thorough their parasitic habits have deteriorated or destroyed every nation in which they have existed in large numbers.“ (Charles A. Weisman, Who is Esau-Edom?, p. 28).
„The Jews are more subject to diseases of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell. Hysteria and neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some physicians of large experience among the Jews have even gone so far as to state that most of them are neurasthenic and hysterical.“ (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX, (1905), p. 225).
„Idiocy and imbecility are found comparatively more often among Jews than among non-Jews...The Mongolian type of idiocy is also very frequently observed among Jews...Among the Jews the proportion of insane has been observed to be very large...Jews are more liable to acute psychoses of early age than are non-Jews.“ (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, (1904), p. 556, 603-04).
„We [Jews] are like an elephant, we don't forget.“ (Thomas Dine, American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee)
„We Jews are an unusual people. We fight over anything.“ (Philip Klutznick, past president of B'nai B'rith, They Dare to Speak Out, p. 276)
„You are right! This reproach of yours, which I feel for certain is at the bottom of your anti-Semitism, is only too well justified; upon this common ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you and defend you against any accusation of promoting Race Hatred...We [Jews] have erred, my friend, we have most grievously erred. And if there is any truth in our error, 3,000, 2,000 maybe 100 years ago, there is nothing now but falseness and madness, a madness which will produce even greater misery and wider anarchy. I confess it to you openly and sincerely and with sorrow...We who have posed as the saviors of the world...We are nothing but the world' seducers, it's destroyers, it's incinderaries, it's executioners...we who promised to lead you to heaven, have finally succeeded in leading you to a new hell...There has been no progress, least of all moral progress...and it is our morality which prohibits all progress, and what is worse -- it stands in the way of every future and natural reconstruction in this ruined world of ours...I look at this world, and shudder at its ghastliness: I shudder all the ore, as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness...“ (The World Significance of the Russian Revolution, by George Lane-Fox Pitt-Rivers, July 1920)
„There is little resemblance between the mystical and undecided Slav, the violent but tradition living Magyar, and the heavy deliberate German. And yet Bolshevism wove the same web over them all, by the same means and with the same tokens. The national temperament of the three races does not the least reveal itself in the terrible conceptions which have been accomplished, in complete agreement, by men of the same mentality in Moscow, Buda Pesth, and Munich.
From the very beginning of the dissolution in Russia, Kerensky was on the spot, then came Trotsky, on watch, in the shadow of Lenin. When Hungary was fainting, weak from loss of blood, Kunfi, Jaszi and Pogany were waiting behind Karolyi, and behind them came Bela Hun and his Staff. And when Bavaria tottered Kurt Eisner was ready to produce the first act of the revolution. In the second act it was Max Lieven (Levy) who proclaimed the Dictatorship of the Proletariat at Munich, a further edition of Russian and Hungarian Bolshevism.
So great are the specific differences between the three races that the mysterious similarity of these events cannot be due to any analogy between them, but only to the work of a fourth race living amongst the others but unmingled with them.
Among modern nations with their short memories, the Jewish people...Whether despised or feared it remains an eternal stranger. it comes without invitation and remains even when driven out. It is scattered and yet coherent. It takes up its abode in the very body of the nations. It creates laws beyond and above the laws. It denies the idea of a homeland but it possesses its own homeland which it carries along with it and establishes wherever it goes. It denies the god of other peoples and everywhere rebuilds the temple. It complains of its isolation, and by mysterious channels it links together the parts of the infinite New Jerusalem which covers the whole universe. It has connections and ties everywhere, which explains how capital and the Press, concentrated in its hands, conserve the same designs in every country of the world, and the interests of the race which are identical in Ruthenian villages and in the City of New York; if it extols someone he is glorified all over the world, and if it wishes to ruin someone the work of destruction is carried out as if directed by a single hand.
The orders come from the depths of Mysterious Darkness. That which the Jew jeers at and destroys among other peoples, it fanatically preserves in the bosom of Judaism. If it teaches revolt and anarchy to others, it in itself shows admirable obedience to its invisible guides.
In the time of the Turkish revolution, a Jew said proudly to my father: 'It is we who are making it, we, the Young Turks, the Jews.' During the Portuguese revolution, I heard the Marquis de Vasconcellos, Portuguese ambassador at Rome, say 'The Jews and the Free Masons are directing the revolution in Lisbon.' Today when the greater part of Europe is given up to the revolution, they are everywhere leading the movement, according to a single plan. How did they succeed in concealing this plan which embraced the whole world and which was not the work of a few months or even years? They used as a screen men of each country, blind, frivolous, venal, forward, or stupid, and who knew nothing. And thus they worked in security, these redoubtable organizers, these sons of an ancient race which knows how to keep a secret. And that is why none of them has betrayed the others.“ (Cecile De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 135; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 141-143)
„They [Jews] were always malcontents. I do not mean to suggest by that they have been simply fault-finders and systematic opponents of all government, but the state of things did not satisfy them; they were perpetually restless, in the expectation of a better state which they never found realized. Their ideal as not one of those which is satisfied with hope, they had not placed it high enough for that, they could not lull their ambition with dreams and visions. They believed in their right to demand immediate satisfactions instead of distant promises. From this has sprung the constant agitation of the Jews.
The causes which brought about the birth of this agitation, which maintained and perpetuated it in the soul of some modern Jews, are not external causes such as the effective tyranny of a prince, of a people, or of a harsh code; they are internal causes, that is to say, which adhere to the very essence of the Hebraic spirit. In the idea of God which the Jews imagined, in their conception of life and of death, we must seek for the reasons of these feelings of revolt with which they are animated.“ (B. Lazare, L'Antisemitism, p. 306; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 185-186)
„There is in the destiny of the race, as in the Semitic character a fixity, a stability, an immortality which impress the mind. One might attempt to explain this fixity by the absence of mixed marriages, but where could one find the cause of this repulsion for the woman or man stranger to the race? Why this negative duration? There is consanguinity between the Gaul described by Julius Caesar and the modern Frenchman, between the German of Tacitus and the German of today. A considerable distance has been traversed between that chapter of the 'Commentaries' and the plays of Moliere. But if the first is the bud the second is the full bloom.
Life, movement, dissimilarities appear in the development of characters, and their contemporary form is only the maturity of an organism which was young several centuries ago, and which, in several centuries will reach old age and disappear.
There is nothing of this among the Semites [here a Jew is admitting that the Jews are not Semites]. Like the consonants of their [again he makes allusion to the fact that the Jews are not Semites] language they appear from the dawn of their race with a clearly defined character, in spare and needy forms, neither able to grow larger nor smaller, like a diamond which can score other substances but is too hard to be marked by any.“ (Kadmi Cohen, Nomades, pp. 115-116; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 188)
„The passionate enthusiasm could take them far, up to the end: it could decide the disappearance of the race by a succession of deadly follies...But this intoxication had its antidote, and this disorder of the mind found its corrective in the conception and practice of a positive utilitarianism...The frenzy of the abstractions does not exclude the arithmetic of interest. Sometimes straying in Heaven the Jew does not, nevertheless, lose his belief in the Earth, in his possessions and his profits. Quite the contrary! Utilitarianism is the other pole of the Jewish soul. All, let us say, in the Jew is speculation, both of ideas and of business; and in this last respect, what a lusty hymn has he not sung to the glorification of worldly interests! The names of Trotsky and of Rothschild mark the extent of the oscillations of the Jewish mind; these two limits contain the whole of society, the whole of civilization of the 20th century.“ (Kadmi Cohen, pp. 88, 156; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 194-195)
„From the ethical standpoint two kinds of Jews are usually distinguished; the Portuguese branch and the German [Khazar; Chazar] branch (Sephardim and Askenazim).
But from the psychological standpoint there are only two kinds: the Hassidim and the Mithnagdim. In the Hassidim we recognize the Zealots. They are the mystics, the cabalists, the demoniancs, the enthusiasts, the disinterested, the poets, the orators, the frantic, the heedless, the visionaries, the sensualists. They are the Mediterranean people, they are the Catholics of Judaism, of the Catholicism of the best period. They are the Prophets who held forth like Isaiah about the time when the wolf will lie down with the lamb, when swords will be turned into plough shares for the plough of Halevy, who sang: 'May my right hand wither if I forget thee O Jerusalem! May my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth if I pronounce not thy name,' and who in enthusiastic delirium upon landing in Palestine kissed the native soil and disdained the approach of the barbarian whose lance transfixed him. They are the thousands and thousands of unfortunates, Jews of the Ghettos, who during the Crusades, massacred one another and allowed themselves to be massacred...
The Mithnadgim, are the Utilitarians, the Protestants of Judaism, the Nordics. Cold, calculating, egoistic, positive, they have on their extreme flank vulgar elements, greedy for gain without scruples, determined to succeed by hook or by crook, without pity.
From the banker, the collected business man, even to the huckster and the usurer, to Gobseck and Shylock, they comprise all the vulgar herd of beings with hard hearts and grasping hands, who gamble and speculate on the misery, both of individuals and nations. As soon as a misfortune occurs they wish to profit by it; as soon as a scarcity is known they monopolize the available goods. Famine is for them an opportunity for gain. And it is they, when the anti-Semitic wave sweeps forward, who invoke the great principle of the solidarity due to the bearers of the Torch...This distinction between the two elements, the two opposite extremes of the soul has always been.“ (Dadmi Cohen, p. 129-130; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, 195-195)
„The Jews are a despicable race of cunning dealers, a race that never desires honor, home and country. That they ever could have been valiant warriors and honest peasants does not appear credible to us, for the disposition of a nation does not alter so quickly. A ministry in which the Jew is supreme, a household in which a Jew has the key to the wardrobe and the management of the finances, a department or a commissary where the Jew does the main business, a university where the Jew acts as brokers and money lenders to students are like the Pontinian Marshes that cannot be drained in which, after the old saying, the vultures eat their cadaver and from its rottenness the insects and worms suck their food.“ (Johann Gottfried Herder, German Author).
Oscar Levy, a well-known Jewish author, in the introduction to his book: „The World Significance of the Communist Revolution,“ said: „We Jews have erred...we have most grievously erred: and if there was truth in our error 3,000, nay 100 years ago, there is nothing now but falseness and madness, a madness that will produce an even greater misery and an even wider anarchy. I confess it to you openly and sincerely, and with a sorrow whose depth and pain, as the ancient Psalmist and only he could moan into this burning universe of ours. We who have boasted and posted as the saviors of this world, we have been nothing but it's seducers, it's destroyers, it's incendiaries, it's executioners. We who have promised to lead the world into heaven have only succeeded in leading you into a new hell. There has been no progress, least of all moral progress. And it is just our (Jewish) morality which has prohibited all real progress, and, what is worse, which even stands in the way of all future and natural reconstruction in this ruined world of ours. I look at this world, and I shudder at its ghastliness; I shudder all the more as I know the Spiritual Authors of this Ghastliness.“
The Jewish author Samuel Roth, in his book „Jews Must Live,“ page 12, says: „The scroll of my life spread before me, and reading it in the glare of a new, savage light, it became a terrible testimony against my people (Jews). The hostility of my parents...my father's fraudulent piety and his impatience with my mother which virtually killed her. The ease with which my Jewish friends sold me out to my detractors. The Jewish machinations which three times sent me to prison. The conscienceless lying of that clique of Jewish journalists who built up libel about my name. The thousand incidents, too minor to be even mentioned. I had never entrusted a Jew with a secret which he did not instantly sell cheap to my enemies. What was wrong with these people who accepted help from me? Was it only an accident, that they were Jews?
Please believe me, I tried to put aside this terrible vision of mine. But the Jews themselves would not let me. Day by day, with cruel, merciless claws, they dug into my flesh and tore aside the last veils of allusion. With subtle scheming and heartless seizing which is the whole of the Jews fearful leverage of trade, they drove me from law office to law office, and from court to court, until I found myself in the court of bankruptcy. It became so that I could not see a Jew approaching me without my heart rising up within me to mutter. 'There goes another Jew, stalking his prey!' Disraeli set the Jewish fashion of saying that every country has the sort of Jews it deserves. It may also be that the Jews have only the sort of enemies they deserve too.“
NESTA WEBSTER, In World Revolution, The Plot against Civilazation, page 163: „Since the earliest times it is as the exploiter that the Jew has been known amongst his fellow men of all races and creeds. Moreover, he has persistently shown himself ungrateful... The Jews have always formed a rebellious element in every state.“
ERNEST RENAN, French historian: „The Jews are not merely a different religious community, but - and this is the most important factor - ethnically an altogether different race. The European felt instinctively that the Jew is a stranger, who immigrated from Asia. The so-called prejudice is natural sentiment. Civilization will overcome antipathy against the Israelite who merely professes another religion, but never against the racially different Jew...In Eastern Europe the Jew is the cancer slowly eating into the flesh of other nations. Exploitation of the people is his only aim. Selfishness and a lack of personal courage are his chief characteristics; self-sacrifice and patriotism are altogether foreign to him.“
GOLDWIN SMITH, Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in Nineteenth Century, October 1881: „The Jew alone regard his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.“
H.L. MENCKEN: 20th century American writer: „The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.“ (Treatise on the Gods)
This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration. The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and start being human beings. (Literary Digest, October 12, 1932)
„Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means internationalism. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are mone-minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which at last is endorsed, and to a certain degree followed, by lawyers of other nationalities. The Jew has been in Germany for a thousand years, and he is still a Jew. He has been in America for all of 200 years, and he has not faded into a pure American by any means - and he will not. (Letter to Hutchins Hapgood, The Nation magazine, April 17, 1935)“
SAND, GEORGE (Amantine Dupin Dudevant). 19th century French novelist: „I saw in 'the wandering Jew' the personification of the Jewish people, exiled in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, they are once again extremely rich, owing to their unfailing rude greediness and their indefatigable activity. With their hard-heartedness that they extend toward people of other faiths and races they are at the point of making themselves kings of the world. This people can thank its obstinacy that France will be Judized within fifty years. Already some wise Jews prophesy this frankly.“ (Letter to Victor Lorie, 1857).
Saturday, January 24, 2026
America 2.0: Under Foreign Occupation
Source: https://www.renegadetribune.com/america-2-0-under-foreign-occupation/
By Donald Jeffries
via
I
Protest
One nation under ZOG
Americans labor under the belief that they are a free people. We get to elect our leaders, after all, and are protected by the Bill of Rights. We’re not like those poor saps in shithole countries like Venezuela. Our elections are as pure as the driven snow. Our “representatives” are breathtakingly brilliant. Be wary lest you believe otherwise.
As my book Survival of the Richest demonstrated so convincingly, there is very little upward mobility in this free country of ours. There doesn’t seem to be a meritocracy in any field that I’m aware of. This includes the world of sports, the subject of the current book I’m writing. It certainly doesn’t include those who run our government. A meritocracy is impossible when so many factors, from the Old Boys network to Affirmative Action, prevent it. In my 44 years of being gainfully employed in our rigged job market, I rarely if ever saw the logical person promoted. You know, the one who actually deserved it. On a national level, we never see any legislation passed that benefits the majority of the people. That actually makes things better. None of this is by accident. As Harry Truman’s Secretary of Defense James Forrestal said, before they pushed him out of a window, if this was all random, once in a while they’d make a mistake in our favor. The record shows they have never made a mistake in our favor.
So there is unquestionably a “They.” You can work as hard as you like, be honest and forthright, and still never rise above a certain level in society. Sure, you can have the right connections, or dumb luck, but most important is the assistance of those who really pull the strings, the unrecognized Occupiers of our country. If the Occupiers choose you, and decide to “install you,” you’re like a “made man” in the mob. Comedian Katt Williams touched on this in a mesmerizing interview with Shannon Sharpe almost exactly a year ago. Podcaster Jason Whitlock has taken this notion that public figures are “installed” to more extreme levels. If you wonder how a particular individual became famous, or how certain people get lucrative jobs that virtually anyone could do, it’s because someone “installed” them. From the 15 minute famous, like Psy and his “Gangham Style,” to the 13 year old “Cash me outside” girl, to truly dubious celebrities like Snoop Dogg to monstrous no-talents like Leslie Jones.
Literally anyone can do a podcast, but what kind of mechanism determines which ones explode with millions of subscribers? Sure, Alex Jones is understandable. Regardless of what he says, he is wildly entertaining and watchable. But have you tried to sit through a Lex Friedman podcast, for instance? They could torture the prisoners with that one at Guantanamo Bay. Friedman has nearly Five million subscribers. The public is fickle, but how did 13 year old Danielle Bregoli go “viral” with a stupid phrase like “Cash me outside?” Virtually all teenage girls say dumb things like that. Bregoli was eventually nominated for a Billboard Music Award, under her wigger rap persona Bhad Bhabie. You just add an extraneous “H” in there, you see. And wallah, you’re “viral!” She’s produced musical masterpieces like “These Heaux” and “Hi Bich.” Not surprisingly, her father is an Ashkenazi Jew. Bregoli’s music manager was Adam Kluger. How many managers in the entertainment world aren’t non-Irish?
I could provide endless examples like this. All these agents, producers, managers, political advisors, form what amounts to an Occupying force. Planted in seemingly every nook and cranny of this crumbling civilization. The Beatles had their Brian Epsteins and Allen Kleins. RFK, Jr. has his rabbi Shmuley. Donald Trump his Jared Kushner. His Miriam Adelson. His Stephen Miller. His Benjamin Netanyahu. These Occupiers, often out of sight behind the scenes, “install” and then manipulate both the talented and untalented public personas they create. JFK had his Irish mafia. But he also was surrounded by non-Irish advisors. Every president has been, going back at least to FDR. As Thomas Massie revealed to Tucker Carlson, AIPAC assigns a “handler” to every member of Congress. You could call AIPAC the Occupiers of Congress. The fortunate gentiles who are “installed” enter into an unsaid agreement whereby they will not question the Occupiers.
Why can’t we acknowledge the reality that people from a very tiny portion of the population occupy key levels of power in this country? Wouldn’t they be akin to a Royal bloodline, since they perpetuate themselves in positions of power, generation after generation? In Hollywood, at the beginning you had Louis B. Mayer at MGM. You had William Fox at Fox. The Warner Brothers. Harry and Jack Cohn at Columbia. Carl Laemmle at Universal. Adolph Zuker at Paramount. All of them from a select two percent of the population. The ones I choose to call the non-Irish. They vastly outnumbered the non-non-Irish at the top in Hollywood, with only Darryl Zanuck at 20th Century Fox and Walt Disney there as Gentile quotas. In radio/television, you had David Sarnoff at RCA. At CBS, you had William S. Paley. The first head of ABC, astonishingly enough, was the non-non-Irish Edward J. Noble. However, he was pretty quickly bought out by Leonard Goldenson, who didn’t celebrate Christmas.
For the zillionth time, I am not castigating Jews as a group. Most of my relatives are part Jewish. And there are lots of very bad non-non-Irish engaging in crime and corruption. But, damn, how can we not notice the prevalence of Jewish names in these enviable positions? Why do so many non-Irish, for example, become sports, acting, and literary agents and publicists? How did they come to dominate that field? Remember, there was an uproar over too many Catholics being on the Supreme Court. Why no uproar over too many Jews in Hollywood, including as heads of every film studio and every major television network? Why was it Mark Zuckerberg who “invented” Facebook, and not Mark O’Brien? Google co-founder Sergey Brin was fully non-Irish, and his partner, Larry Page, was half-Jewish. YouTube was founded by a diverse group, all of them non-non-Irish. However, once non-Irish Susan Wojcicki took over as CEO in 2014, it wasn’t long before freethinkers began being banned. Jab aficionado Wojcicki was particularly keen on stopping “medical misinformation” before she #diedsuddenly at fifty six. Doctors were said to be baffled.
If you looked around you, and noticed that a plethora of people with red hair and freckles seemed to hold a wildly disproportionate number of influential jobs in your society, wouldn’t that grab your attention? About two percent of Americans have red hair and freckles. Hmm. That two percent sounds awfully familiar. You saw what happened when too many Asian students began being accepted at Harvard. The media has an issue with “too many” Whites anywhere, except maybe in prison. But there has never been a push to “diversify” the top of television networks, film studios, social media platforms, publishing, etc., beyond making it less White. A non-conspiratorial YouTube video boasts, “Why 64% of Fortune 500 Companies have Jewish CEOs.” So it looks like this incredibly successful two percent is Occupying corporate America as well. Tim Pool, a classic example of someone who’s been “installed,” got his start with the Occupy Wall Street movement. Can we start an Occupy the Occupiers movement?
If all American Jews wore yarmulkes in public, like odious “U.S.” Rep. Randy Fine, who recently said on Newsmax, “If you get in the way of the government, you’re going to end up just like that lady (in Minneapolis),” even the Sheeple might get the point. Whenever you looked at who’s framing public discourse, and establishing the parameters of acceptable debate, you’d start noticing all those yarmulkes. Maybe half-Jews would only wear half a yarmulke. We can’t even question this almost supernatural level of disproportionate power, because the Occupiers hold such sway in every possible place that you might open up an uncontainable can of non-Irish worms; politics, business, all brands of media and entertainment. This is a simple matter of honesty. We need what the leftists of the 1970s would call a “sunshine law,” to disclose just what a significant percentage of our most prominent citizens come from a group small enough to not outnumber the freckled redheads.The Occupiers were front and center in the Civil Rights movement. Martin Luther King and the other Civil Rights leaders had a non-Irish Occupier behind them. Watching and observing, like rabbi Shmuley watches RFK, Jr. Howard Cosell was there to orchestrate the Cassius Clay/Muhammad Ali script. Probably the two most influential intellectual figures of the 20th century were Sigmund Freud and Albert Einstein. Both Hannukah celebrants. Freud’s magnificent contribution to our civilization was to convince the populace that all boys are born with a desire to kill their fathers and screw their mothers. Einstein, who apparently never learned to tie his shoes, developed a theory of “relativity” that is incomprehensible to pretty much everyone. The true genius Nikola Tesla had the courage to call Einstein’s theory, “a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king.” Just think: without this magical theory, they could never have faked the moon flights.
Why are all the sex “experts” non-Irish? Dr. Ruth Westheimer. Dr. Laura Schlesinger. Dr. Drew Pinsky. Why no Dr. Maggiano? No Dr. Callahan? The world’s first child rearing “expert” was Dr. Benjamin Spock. He wasn’t a Vulcan. Don’t forget Dr. Joyce Brothers, who was an “expert” on boxing on one of those rigged game shows of the 1950s, but survived the scandal to become a regular guest on all the talk shows of the era. Dr. Carl Sagan was the first celebrity astronomer. Johnny Carson loved him; they would regularly ridicule those who reported seeing UFOs. Dear Abby and Ann Landers. Twin sisters. Non-Irish sisters. “Competing” for best “advice” column. Dave Portnoy, head of one of those “competitive” gambling sites, which bankrupt sports fans. Portnoy also rates pizza at various establishments. It takes a special mind- one might even call it “chosen”- to excel at that. Occupiers. Everywhere. It is impossible to chronicle this culture of ours without noting these Occupiers in key roles.
What is most apparent is that, in the year of our Lord 2026, there is no opposition to the Occupiers. There may be growing resentment to them, and a “noticing” of them, but only among the people they are occupying. No one in a position of real authority can be anti-Zionist and remain in authority. Probably the most powerful voices questioning Zionism at this point are Rep. Thomas Massie, Candace Owens, and Tucker Carlson. Massie will be lucky to survive a primary challenge from Trumpenstein’s pro-Israeli candidate. Most in the alt media are skeptical of both Owens and Carlson. Their opposition to Zionism may be controlled. By the Occupiers, of course. Look at Nick Fuentes, the seeming “anti-Semite” who nevertheless insists that there is no evidence Israel was connected to the Charlie Kirk assassination, and now is cheerleading Trump’s foreign interventionism that has warmed the hearts of all powerful Israelis.
We must first get the sheeple to understand that they are Occupied. And that an unknown number of these Occupiers are dual citizens, with the other citizenship always being Israel. I mean, you could at least vote out the overtly Israel-first Randy Fine, and Brian Mast, who proudly wears his IDF military uniform on the floor of our Congress. If that doesn’t represent the actions of an Occupier, I don’t know what would. Cancel Nancy Pelosi’s pension for saying that a commitment to Israel is the top priority of Congress. Stop listening to Zionist lapdog Dan Bongino, who when asked what one issue was dear to his heart, instantly replied, “the defense of Israel.” Recognize the propaganda for what it is, and whose purpose it serves. Iran is no threat to the United States. They had nothing to do with the very dubious assassination attempt on Trump in Butler. Before you accuse a nation of being a “state sponsor” of terrorism, explain what that even means. Then define “terrorism” for us.
Without “terrorism,” and the continuously changing groups associated with it, from the PLO to Hamas, Zionism wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. Without the persistent reminders about the one and only Holocaust with a capital “H,” people would rightfully question why Israel was created, on land belonging to other people. This is not even considering everything the Israelis- who are obvious Occupiers of Palestine, have done to the inhabitants over the course of nearly 80 years. From blowing up the King David hotel to the present genocide in Gaza, it’s quite the laundry list of atrocities. One might almost call it “terrorism.” Worst of all, U.S. taxpayer money made it all possible. It costs money to subjugate a population. Palestinian blood is on our hands. And again, without what amounts to a foreign Occupation, how can we explain why our illustrious leaders are reluctant to issue a single discouraging word? Why do they all go the Wailing Wall, and not to some holy Christian place?
It’s no fun writing about the non-Irish so much. It certainly does nothing for your career prospects. Jews like Bob Dylan, Mark Lane, Harold Weisberg, and Randy Newman were heroes of my youth. When I talk about the non-Irish, that doesn’t apply to 99.9% of Jews, who are victims of the same rigged system we all are. It certainly doesn’t apply to my many cousins who are half-Jewish, one quarter-Jewish, and one-eighth Jewish. But we have to be able to discuss this, because it is relevant, and is at the heart of whatever truly ugly anti-Jewish bigotry exists. We are told that diversity is our strength. What kind of diversity always includes primarily people from only one tiny group in decision making roles? Movers and shakers should come from a cross section of the population, not just that magical 2 percent. All men, women, and they/thems are created equal. It isn’t “hate” to point out the truth. We all should have a say in this crumbling country of ours. And we all ought to resent being Occupied.
Thursday, January 22, 2026
Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Saturday, January 17, 2026
Inconvenient History - Volume 6
DOWNLOAD THE BOOK IN PDF FORMAT.
Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern warfare.
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
Monday, January 12, 2026
Jewish Involvement in Instigating World War II
Source: https://codoh.com/library/document/jewish-involvement-instigating-world-war-ii/
By John Wear
November 12, 2021
Last updated on June 9, 2024
Adolf Hitler said that Jews controlled both U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Soviet Union. Hitler mentioned the Jewish control of Roosevelt and the Soviet Union in his speech on December 11, 1941, declaring war on the United States:[1]
“The circle of Jews around Roosevelt encouraged him [to divert attention from domestic problems to foreign policy]. With Old-Testament vindictiveness, they regarded the United States as the instrument which they and he could use to prepare a second Purim against the nations of Europe, which were increasingly anti-Jewish. So it was that the Jews, in all of their satanic baseness, gathered around this man, and he relied on them. […]
We know the power behind Roosevelt. It is the same eternal Jew that believes that his hour has come to impose the same fate on us that we have all seen and experienced with horror in Soviet Russia. We have gotten to know the Jewish paradise on earth first hand. Millions of German soldiers have personally seen the land where this international Jewry has destroyed and annihilated people and property. Perhaps the president of the United States does not understand this. If so, that only speaks for his intellectual narrowmindedness.”
This article examines the validity of Hitler’s claim that Jews controlled both the U.S. and Soviet governments, and his allegations of Jewish involvement in instigating World War II.
Validity of Adolf Hitler’s Statements
Hitler was correct that Roosevelt was surrounded by numerous Jewish advisors. Jewish historian Lucy Dawidowicz wrote:[2]
“Roosevelt himself brought into his immediate circle more Jews than any other President before or after him.”
A partial list of Jews surrounding Roosevelt include: Bernard Baruch, Felix Frankfurter, David E. Lilienthal, David Niles, Louis Brandeis, Samuel I. Rosenman, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Benjamin V. Cohen, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Francis Perkins, Sidney Hillman, Herbert H. Lehman, Jesse I. Straus, Harold J. Laski, Charles E. Wyzanski, Samuel Untermyer, Edward Filene, David Dubinsky, Mordecai Ezekiel, Abe Fortas, Harold Ickes, Isador Lubin, Harry Dexter White (Weiss), David Weintraub, Nathan G. Silvermaster, Harold Glasser, Irving Kaplan, Solomon Adler, Benjamin Cardozo, Anna Rosenberg, and numerous others, almost to the exclusion of gentile advisers.
As a consequence, Roosevelt was surrounded by a milieu of Jewish hate and hostility toward Germany. Roosevelt was determined to destroy Germany because Roosevelt’s Jewish advisors were determined to destroy Germany.[3]
Hitler was also correct that Jews had taken control of the Soviet Union. Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, a U.S. Army intelligence officer in Russia during its revolutionary period, stated in a report dated June 9, 1919:[4]
“A table made up in 1918 by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times in Russia, shows at that time there were 384 commissars including two Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number, 264 had come from the United States since the downfall of the imperial government.”
Thus, the “Russian revolution” had only 13 ethnic Russians and more than 300 Jews in its top governing body of 384 members.
British intelligence reports also confirm that Jews controlled the Communist revolution in the Soviet Union. The first sentence in a lengthy British intelligence report dated July 16, 1919, stated: “There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews.” Even Winston Churchill, in an article appearing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald on February 8, 1920 wrote:[5]
“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews […].”
American intelligence officers reported that most Bolshevik leaders were Jews. The New York office of The Military Intelligence Division (MID) reported “that there is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews.” In Bern, an American agent reported that 90% of those attending secret Bolshevik meetings were Jews. The British government also obtained evidence that the Bolshevik movement throughout the world is an international conspiracy of Jews. The official MID viewpoint was that “Jewish intellectuals have had the leading and commanding part everywhere,” and because of “the growing power of the Jews,” they practically controlled the Soviet government.[6]
U.S. Gen. Amos A. Fries told MID’s chief in 1926 that Polish officers believed “extremely clever and absolutely unscrupulous” Jewish leaders, most disguised behind Russian names, really controlled the Soviet Union. Fries wrote:[7]
“[O]f the Russian Congress some 70% were Jews, and the remaining 30% were largely figureheads […] real power […] was entirely in the hands of the Jews who were in it […] for what they could get out of it, and very few members […] really believe in the doctrines which they preach.”
Jewish leaders also used Churchill to agitate for war against Germany. Churchill was financially supported by the anti-German group The Focus, whose membership included many wealthy British and American Jews. Churchill wrote that the basis of The Focus “is, of course, Jewish resentment.”[8]
American Gen. Robert E. Wood stated before a U.S. Senate committee that Churchill had said to him in November 1936, “Germany is getting too strong, and we must smash her.” Churchill also stated in 1936:[9]
“We will force Hitler into war, whether he wants it or not.”
Churchill was an exceptional orator and writer, and he was an effective agent in stirring up British public opinion against Germany.
Jewish Soviet Agents
Jewish Soviet agents conspired to have Japan attack the United States. Harry Dexter White, who was later proven to be a Soviet agent, carried out a mission to provoke Japan into war with the United States. When Secretary of State Cordell Hull allowed the peacemakers in Roosevelt’s administration to put together a modus vivendi that had real potential, White drafted a 10-point proposal that the Japanese were certain to reject. White passed a copy of his proposal to Hull, and this final American offer – the so-called “Hull note” – was presented to the Japanese on November 26, 1941.[10]
The Hull note, which was based on two memoranda from White, was a declaration of war as far as the Japanese were concerned. The Hull note destroyed any possible peace settlement with the Japanese, and led to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. In this regard, John Koster writes:[11]
“Harry Dexter White, acting under orders from Soviet intelligence, pulled the strings by which Cordell Hull and [State Department expert on Far Eastern Affairs] Stanley Hornbeck handed the Japanese an ultimatum that was tantamount to a declaration of war – when both the Japanese cabinet and the U.S. military were desperately eager for peace. […] Harry Dexter White knew exactly what he was doing. The man himself remains a mystery, but the documents speak for themselves. Harry Dexter White gave us Pearl Harbor.”
The Soviets had also planted numerous other Jewish agents in the Roosevelt administration. For example, Harold Glasser, a member of Morgenthau’s Treasury staff, provided intelligence from the War Department and the White House to the Soviets. Glasser’s reports were deemed so important by the NKVD that 74 reports generated from his material went directly to Stalin. One historian writes of the Soviet infiltration of the U.S. government and its effect on Roosevelt:[12]
“These spies, plus the hundreds in other U.S. agencies at the time, including the military and the OSS, permeated the administration in Washington, and, ultimately, the White House, surrounding FDR. He was basically in the Soviet’s pocket. He admired Stalin, sought his favor. Right or wrong, he thought the Soviet Union indispensable in the war, crucial to bringing world peace after it, and he wanted the Soviets handled with kid gloves. FDR was star struck. The Russians hardly could have done better if he was a Soviet spy.”
The opening of the Soviet archives in 1995 revealed that more than 300 communist members or supporters had infiltrated the American government. Working in Lend-Lease, the Treasury Department, the State Department, the office of the president, the office of the vice president, and even American intelligence operations, these spies constantly tried to shift U.S. policy in a pro-Soviet direction. During World War II, several of these Soviet spies were well-positioned to influence American policy. Especially at the Tehran and Yalta meetings toward the end of World War II, the Soviet spies were able to influence Roosevelt to make huge concessions to the Soviet Union.[13]
Jerzy Potocki’s Report
The Germans seized a mass of documents from the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs when they invaded Warsaw in late September 1939. The documents were seized when a German SS brigade led by Freiherr von Kuensberg captured the center of Warsaw ahead of the regular German army. Von Kuensberg’s men took control of the Polish Foreign Ministry just as Ministry officials were in the process of burning incriminating documents. These documents clearly establish Roosevelt’s crucial role in planning and instigating World War II. They also reveal the Jewish forces behind President Roosevelt that pushed for war.[14]
Jerzy Antoni Potocki (1889-1961),
Polish Ambassador to the U.S. (1936-1940)
Some of the secret Polish documents were first published in the United States as The German White Paper. Probably the most revealing document in the collection is a secret report dated January 12, 1939, by Jerzy Potocki, the Polish ambassador to the United States. This report discusses the involvement of American Jews in promoting war against Germany:[15]
“There is a feeling now prevalent in the United States marked by growing hatred of Fascism, and above all of Chancellor Hitler and everything connected with National Socialism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100% [of the] radio, film, daily and periodical press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents Germany as black as possible – above all religious persecution and concentration camps are exploited – this propaganda is nevertheless extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and knows nothing of the situation in Europe.
At the present moment, most Americans regard Chancellor Hitler and National Socialism as the greatest evil and greatest peril threatening the world. The situation here provides an excellent platform for public speakers of all kinds, for emigrants from Germany and Czechoslovakia who with a great many words and with most various calumnies, incite the public. They praise American liberty which they contrast with the totalitarian states.
It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign, which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia is almost completely eliminated. Soviet Russia, if mentioned at all, is mentioned in a friendly manner and things are presented in such a way that it would seem that the Soviet Union were cooperating with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the clever propaganda the sympathies of the American public are completely on the side of Red Spain…
The prevalent hatred against everything which is in any way connected with German National Socialism is further kindled by the brutal attitude against the Jews in Germany and by the émigré problem. In this action, Jewish intellectuals participated; for instance, Bernard Baruch; the Governor of New York State, Lehman; the newly appointed judge of the Supreme Court, Felix Frankfurter; Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau, and others who are personal friends of Roosevelt. They want the President to become the champion of human rights, freedom of religion and speech, and the man who, in the future, will punish trouble-mongers. These groups, people who want to pose as representatives of ‘Americanism’ and ‘defenders of democracy’ in the last analysis, are connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.
For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the interests of its race, to put the president of the United States at this ‘ideal’ post of champion of human rights, was a clever move. In this manner, they created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile camps. The entire issue is worked out in a mysterious manner. Roosevelt has been forcing the foundation for vitalizing American foreign policy, and simultaneously has been procuring enormous stocks for the coming war, for which the Jews are striving consciously. With regard to domestic policy, it is extremely convenient to divert public attention from anti-Semitism, which is ever growing in the United States, by talking about the necessity of defending faith and individual liberty against the onslaught of Fascism.”
Charles Lindbergh’s Speech
Charles Lindbergh also believed that Jews were a driving force behind World War II. On September 11, 1941, more than 8,000 people crowded into the Des Moines Coliseum to hear Lindbergh speak at an America First Committee rally. Lindbergh courageously made a “for-the-record” speech identifying the war makers as he saw them. Lindbergh told his audience:[16]
“The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish, and the Roosevelt administration. Behind these groups, but of lesser importance, are a number of capitalists, anglophiles, and intellectuals, who believe that their future, and the future of mankind, depend upon the domination of the British Empire. Add to these the Communistic groups who were opposed to intervention until a few weeks ago, and I believe I have named the major war agitators in this country.”
This speech was the only public address in which Lindbergh mentioned the Jews. Lindbergh in this speech elaborated on the Jewish group’s influence:[17]
“It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race. No person with a sense of dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy, both for us and for them.
Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences. Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastation. A few far-sighted Jewish people realize this, and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.
I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war. We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.”
Charles Lindbergh during his (in)famous Des Moines speech.
Rarely has any public address in American history caused more of an uproar than did Lindbergh’s Des Moines speech. Criticism and denunciations of Lindbergh’s speech came from all across the United States. Newspapers and organized interventionist groups joined in savage attacks on Lindbergh. Criticism of Lindbergh’s speech also emanated from high political levels in the United States. For example, Governor Thomas E. Dewey of New York called Lindbergh’s speech “an inexcusable abuse of the right of freedom of speech.”[18]
By the end of 1941, Lindbergh had become one of the most reviled men in American history. One columnist wrote that Lindbergh had plummeted from “Public Hero No. 1” to “Public Enemy No. 1.”[19] A 1942 poll showed that only 10% of Americans had a favorable view of Lindbergh, while 81% had an unfavorable view.[20] Lindbergh’s sister-in-law Constance reflected on America’s new attitude toward Lindbergh:[21]
“Imagine, in just 15 years he has gone from Jesus to Judas!”
Lindbergh never apologized for his Des Moines address and felt he had done nothing wrong. He wrote in his journal four days after his speech:[22]
“I felt I had worded my Des Moines address carefully and moderately. It seems that almost anything can be discussed in America except the Jewish problem. The very mention of the word ‘Jew’ is cause for a storm. Personally, I feel that the only hope for a moderate solution lies in an open and frank discussion.”
Lindbergh was correct that he had worded his address carefully and moderately. In fact, since Jews controlled both the American and British governments, he could properly have said that Jews were the sole primary group pressing for war against Germany.
U.S. Military Intelligence
Many U.S. military intelligence officers saw Jews as the driving force behind World War II. Throughout the 1930s, many military officers foresaw a situation in which Jewish influence would involve the United States in a war against Germany. They were particularly wary of Franklin Roosevelt’s scare tactics about German threats to the Western Hemisphere.[23] In fact, many military intelligence officers were saying essentially the same thing about Jews as Adolf Hitler.
It was widely known among U.S. military intelligence leaders that Jews played a prominent role in the Roosevelt administration. For this and other reasons, Roosevelt was widely unpopular among most U.S. Army officers. American historian Joseph Bendersky writes:[24]
“Years later, the wife of Col. Truman Smith recounted the ‘exultation’ and ‘fierce delight’ in their social and political circle upon hearing the news of Roosevelt’s death. Finally, in her words, ‘The evil man was dead!’”
A colonel at the Army War College asked Harvard historian William Langer why “all one hears is hostility for Hitler and for Germany.” Langer candidly replied:[25]
“I think the Jewish influence has a great deal to do with it. You have to face the fact that some of our most important American newspapers are Jewish-controlled, and, I suppose, if I were a Jew, I would feel about Nazi Germany as most Jews feel and it would be most inevitable that the coloring of the news takes on that tinge. As I read the New York Times, for example, it is perfectly clear that every little upset that occurs (and after all many upsets occur in a country of 70 million people) is given a great deal of prominence. The other part of it is soft-pedaled or put off with a sneer. So, that in a rather subtle way, the picture you get is that there is no good in the Germans whatever.”
John Beaty edited secret daily intelligence reports as a G-2 officer in Washington between 1941 and 1947. Beaty wrote the book The Iron Curtain over America based on his insights while inside G-2. He charged that World War II was an unnecessary war fostered by Jews. The war was designed to kill as many Germans and Americans as possible by prolonging the war through demands for unconditional surrender and the Morgenthau Plan. The uncivilized bombing of German cities was also designed to mass murder innocent German civilians.[26]
Beaty described “the Holocaust” as a “fantastic hoax” and United States support for Israel as a policy fiasco. The Iron Curtain over America received strong support from many in the military intelligence community. U.S. Gen. George E. Stratemeyer, for example, said he owed Beaty a great debt, since from Beaty’s book he finally learned what really occurred back home while he was fighting overseas. Stratemeyer said that every loyal American should read The Iron Curtain over America.[27]
Many other U.S. military leaders also concluded that Jews had influenced America to enter World War II. For example, Gen. Albert C. Wedemeyer wrote to retired Col. Truman Smith a few years after the war that the British, Zionists and Communists made American entry into the war inevitable. Wedemeyer said they were motivated by selfish interests rather than the welfare of humanity. He stated that “most of the people associated with Communism in the early days were Jews.” Wedemeyer also claimed that Roosevelt’s Jewish advisers “did everything possible to spread venom and hatred against the Nazis and to arouse Roosevelt against the Germans.”[28]
Conclusion
Hitler was convinced that Jews were ultimately responsible for World War II, and said so on many occasions.[29] A large body of evidence indicates that Jews had taken control of the American, British and Soviet governments prior to World War II. Hitler correctly stated that these Jews played a major role in instigating World War II to the detriment of non-Jewish citizens.
Notes
[1] Weber, Mark, “The Reichstag Speech of 11 December 1941: Hitler’s Declaration of War against the United States,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, Winter 1988-1989, pp. 406, 411; https://codoh.com/library/document/hitlers-declaration-of-war-against-the-united/.
[2] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, Bloomington, Ind.: AuthorHouse, 2012, p. 339.
[3] Ibid., pp. 321, 339-340.
[4] Duke, David, Jewish Supremacism: My Awakening to the Jewish Question, 2nd edition, Mandeville, La.: Free Speech Press, 2007, pp. 47-48.
[5] Ibid., pp. 45-46, 48.
[6] Bendersky, Joseph W., The “Jewish Threat”: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army, New York: Basic Books, 2000, pp. 60, 69, 116, 118.
[7] Ibid., p. 199.
[8] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, op. cit., p. 322. The Focus was originally called the Anti-Nazi Council. The name of the group was later changed in July 1936 to The Focus based on Winston Churchill’s wishes for a less negative title. See Irving, David, Churchill’s War (Vol. One), New York: Avon Books, 1987, pp. 54, 59. Churchill’s help in the launching and operation of The Focus is discussed in Gilbert, Martin, Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship, New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC, 2007, p. 136.
[9] Walendy, Udo, Truth for Germany: The Guilt Question of the Second World War, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2013, pp. 275-276. See also Hughes, Emrys, Winston Churchill: His Career in War and Peace, 1955, p. 145.
[10] Koster, John, Operation Snow, Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 2012, pp. 135-137, 169.
[11] Ibid., p. 215.
[12] Wilcox, Robert K., Target: Patton, Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 2008, pp. 250-251.
[13] Folsom, Burton W. Jr. and Anita, FDR Goes to War, New York: Threshold Editions, 2011, pp. 242, 245.
[14] Weber, Mark, “President Roosevelt’s Campaign to Incite War in Europe: The Secret Polish Documents,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, Summer 1983, pp. 136-137, 140; https://codoh.com/library/document/president-roosevelts-campaign-to-incite-war-in/.
[15] Count Jerzy Potocki to Polish Foreign Minister in Warsaw, The German White Paper: Full Text of the Polish Documents Issued by the Berlin Foreign Office; with a forward by C. Hartley Grattan, New York: Howell, Soskin & Company, 1940, pp. 29-31.
[16] Cole, Wayne S., Charles A. Lindbergh and the Battle against American Intervention in World War II, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974, pp. 153, 159-161.
[17] Ibid., pp. 171-172.
[18] Ibid., pp. 173-175.
[19] Berg, A. Scott, Lindbergh, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1998, p. 428.
[20] Hart, Bradley W., Hitler’s American Friends: The Third Reich’s Supporters in the United States, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018, p. 227.
[21] Berg, A. Scott, Lindbergh, op. cit., p. 433.
[22] Lindbergh, Charles A., The Wartime Journals of Charles A. Lindbergh, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970, p. 539.
[23] Bendersky, Joseph W., The “Jewish Threat”, op. cit., pp. 270-271.
[24] Ibid., pp. 212-213, 244.
[25] Ibid., p. 273.
[26] Ibid., pp. 405-408.
[27] Ibid., pp. 408-409.
[28] Ibid., p. 274.
[29] Dalton, Thomas, The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2019, p. 147.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)