By Veronica Clark
Published: 2011-10-01
What exactly did the NSDAP (National Socialist German Worker's Party)
represent and who were its founding members? Why and how did Adolf Hitler
transform the party from an unimpressive proletariat workers’ party to a
full-fledged political machine that obtained absolute power in Germany? Perhaps
more important, how was it funded? We answer these questions in this
introduction. But first, we begin with an examination of the early stages of
the NSDAP and its recruiting process. One must understand how this process
unfolded if one is to understand the NSDAP’s position on Judaism and
Freemasonry as well as the prevailing social and political order of the day.
Naturally, we also reveal some of the other important aspects of its early
development, which necessitates a fair amount of myth busting about Hitler,
including who actually gave him money.
Triumvirate:
Leadership, development and unity
Adolf Hitler, contrary to his own self-myths and the myths of others, was
not poor—at least not until he had drained his savings and entitlements
gallivanting in Vienna. Many historians have written that Hitler simply lived
day-to-day wasting both his money and time, but in so doing they overlook
Hitler’s experiences and ‘life education’ that later played such an important
role in the development and direction of National Socialism as well as the
Second World War. The development and direction of both can be traced to
Hitler’s experiences during those “lost” years.
Hitler, like so many other young German men and women of his day, fell from
middle-class status into that of the “wretched proletariat.” This was something
that young Hitler refused to accept. He was deeply embittered by his Vienna
experiences, which offered false promises of prosperity and hope for young
people with enough willpower and talent. The prevailing dissonance of the time
and place in which he grew up inculcated in him a burning desire to change
these circumstances, which is precisely what he did after 1933. Hitler was so
resentful of the class-ridden society that was Vienna, and Austria and Europe
generally, that one of his key aims throughout both the peace and war years was
cultivating a system of merit. One’s birth station was not what mattered. What
mattered were one’s talent, loyalty, dependability and fortitude, notably in
the face of adversity and uncertainty. Hitler was able to overcome most
imbedded class barriers in two distinct ways:
1.
He recruited both men and
women from all social classes and accordingly tailored his speech and
disposition to each, depending on his/her social standing.
2.
He supplanted economic
valuation with racial valuation.
Let’s look at the first point. Hitler needed the broadest spectrum of
German society he could get, so this meant that he needed to appeal to men,
women, young, old, wealthy, poor, unemployed and employed alike. Women were
amongst Hitler’s most devoted and fervent supporters in the early years. So
were low-wage earners, small businessmen and foreign nobles, such as White
Russian émigrés who wished to see the return of the Russian monarchy. They
provided Hitler with a physical audience, elite and business connections and
monetary support, most of which ended up being granted in the form of loans.
Hitler needed industrialists as much as he needed the workers, elites and
disenfranchised foreigners. Since his goal was to raise the station of all
lower-class ethnic Germans, he had to win them all together, which required a
strategy of multi-class appeal. When he met and spoke with counts, duchesses
and other members of the former royalty, he addressed them in a royal manner.
His etiquette, speech and personal manners proved impeccable in such company.
When he met or spoke with industrialists, such as Fritz Thyssen, he tailored
his behavior and manner to match that of the hopes and fears of industrialist
Germany. At the same time he was careful to scale back his socialistic language
in such company, so that the industrialists would not misidentify him as a
Marxist-Communist. He had to convince them that he would crush
Marxist-Communism and uphold their industrial power base in the face of the
growing mass of disenchanted, underpaid workers who felt they were being
cheated and exploited by German industry. Whenever things got economically
tough, the workers suffered wage and benefit cuts. They blamed the
industrialists, but Hitler saw that the industrialists were also suffering:
many went bankrupt during the inflation as well as during the Great Depression.
The crippling Versailles reparations forced most German industrialists and
exporters into an untenable economic position, which in turn harmed German
workers. This meant that Hitler had to at least hint at future German
rearmament, which was covertly occurring anyway. On the other hand, Hitler had
to promise the workers, his single largest and most important support base in
almost every respect in the formative years, that he would not allow the state
or industry to exploit them or continue treating them as automatons. We can see
that balancing the wants and needs of these three core sectors of class-ridden
Germany was far from simple. But Hitler did it, and nearly bloodlessly
(relative to the Communist revolutions in Russia and throughout Eastern
Europe).
Now to the second point: Hitler had to come up with a unifying ideology for
Germanic peoples. This task seems simple in retrospect, because Germany was a
homogenous society by today’s standards. However, back then this was not how
the German situation was seen. Germany may have been racially homogenous, but
class antagonisms were so deep-seated that few if any German elites and nobles
were interested in sharing political or social power with lower-class and
middle-class Germans. The Junkers (estates Lords) treated their farmhands
(serfs) as second- or third-class citizens and ordered them to pack up and get
out if they dared to vote against their landlord employers. According to James
and Suzanne Pool's research, many of the Junkers, notably the friends of von
Hindenburg, refused to discontinue living the feudal order, which helped fuel
the growing mass discontent for monarchy. This only served the interests of
republicans and Freemasons, both of whom wished to see the end of monarchy for
good. We will discuss their motivations later. For now it is enough to say that
their motives were far from benevolent. German class divisions trumped any sort
of racial or ethnic solidarity. Not surprisingly, one finds that the desire to
unite all Germans as racial comrades was a desire shared almost entirely
amongst the lower and middle classes, and even many middle-class Germans did
everything they could to cling to their bourgeois life station, even if it
meant keeping the lower-classes downtrodden. As one can see, Hitler’s goal was
anything but simple.
How, then, did Hitler unite Germans? And how successful was he? Hitler
united Germans by invoking an ideological concept similar to Italy’s Romanita,
as espoused by Benito Mussolini. Hitler’s concept was Nordicism: the
basic, simplified premise of which was that all Germanic peoples were united by
their Nordic racial component, and because they were united by this common
“race soul” or blood component, how could they fight or be divided? While such
a unifying idea sounded feasible and reasonable to many, some resisted
nonetheless. The Junkers, former nobility, and many other business elites in
Germany saw Hitler as nothing other than a lowly former corporal who had no
clout given his petit bourgeois (lower middle-class) upbringing. Hitler was
only partially successful in uniting all Germans as Volksgenossen. His
lack of complete success in this regard, an unattainable goal to be sure, later
proved to be his undoing. Elites amongst the officer corps did immeasurable damage
to Hitler and his war effort, but the story of their treachery and sabotage is
beyond the scope of this discussion.
Might Hitler have been more successful had he been more racially inclusive
early on? Not necessarily. Mussolini, unlike Hitler, was not racially exclusive
at any point and expended a great deal of effort and time attempting to recruit
non-Italians to the Italian fascist cause. He was largely unsuccessful,
especially in Ethiopia—this in spite of the fact that he had Ethiopians trained
as pilots (before the Tuskegee Airmen even came into being) and promised them
higher status within a Fascist Italian Empire. We may deduce from this example
that Hitler having merely extended his hand openly in the beginning to
non-Germans would not have guaranteed National Socialism’s political or
military success. Mussolini did so and his tolerant hand was rejected. Indeed
the U.S. and Britain did not win the Second World War due to non-white
conscription, but because they supported and funded the Soviet war machine and
were willing to bomb Germany indiscriminately. Anyway, this brings us back to
our main point, which is that unifying a body of people, regardless of whether
it is homogenous or diverse, is no easy task. Hitler was only able to convince
the lower and middle classes that racial value must supersede economic (class)
value. Most of the German elites were never won over to his Nordicism.
So, what does all of this mean? First, it means that a party that wishes to
succeed in a Western Liberal-Democratic context must appeal to women and men
both, citizens of all ages, and all social classes. A sensible and serious
leader and party cannot afford to leave any group out. Naturally this all
depends on the individual nation and citizenry in question, as Hitler’s brand
of politics and leadership were formed with a specific time, culture, people
and place in mind. It was not intended for export, but for adaptation in
multiple contexts. Hitler’s brand of politics was in fact largely modeled after
Mussolini’s as well as the leadership of the Austrian mayor Karl Lueger.
Second, it means that the masses are more important to a party’s success
than the elites, because of their numbers. Only the masses have the power to
invoke fear in the upper-class by threatening to support violent revolutionary
parties and organizations, which are often led and funded by hostile
fifth-columnists. The Communist Party (KPD) was the only party besides Hitler’s
that evoked genuine fear in the elite classes of Germany. Hitler and the NSDAP
could not be ignored for the very reason that they, besides the
Marxist-Communists, had the largest mass following in Germany at the time.
Industrialists could not afford to anger or rebuff Hitler and the NSDAP; if
they did, then Hitler’s followers would quickly have swelled the ranks of the
Communists or perhaps have even overthrown him, as Ernst Röhm and many SA
members wished to do. Hitler’s party was the only non-Communist, nationalist
party that offered the lower and middle classes a better standing in German
society. Given Hitler’s ability to keep the overwhelming majority of his
followers in line and loyal meant that he alone could prevent a transitional
bloodbath, which is what most of the upper-class Germans feared the most. And
this is exactly what he did. What’s important to bear in mind, however, is that
Hitler needed a credible threat to maintain his personal and political leverage
over the upper classes and big business. Without the Communists to threaten
them via mass upheaval and bloodshed, the industrialists and former nobility
had little reason other than patriotism to support Hitler and the NSDAP.
Third, a citizenry that wishes to remain united needs a party that can
accomplish this. Bavarians wanted to secede from Germany and become an
independent state. Big business demanded an end to the Junker estates that
squandered numerous government bailouts and demanded trade tariffs that harmed
German industry. The Junkers did not care whether the industrialists suffered,
so long as their estates were still in their name and they could live a lavish
lifestyle of luxury at the German taxpayers’ expense. To mediate such
divisiveness, Hitler invoked Nordicism, which called on Germans to recognize
and value their blood ties instead of their social standing (based on wealth).
This unifying ideology provided Hitler with the necessary means to develop a
system of merit: one could rise to the top of National Socialist society
regardless of one’s parents’ or personal finances, because one was equal to all
other Germans from the racial point-of-view. Hitler’s German racialism and
anti-Semitism were the practical means for achieving classless unity among
formerly divided Germans. Hitler used a similar approach later on with the
Waffen-SS. He turned an exclusively German organizational concept (the Allgemeine
SS) into an international, multiethnic idea by uniting everyone who
participated against Jewish-Bolshevism, the enemy of “all peoples.”
Hitler salutes marching National Socialists in
Weimar, October 1930.
Bundesarchiv, Bild 102-10541 / Unknown / CC-BY-SA [CC-BY-SA-3.0-de (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons
Bundesarchiv, Bild 102-10541 / Unknown / CC-BY-SA [CC-BY-SA-3.0-de (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons
Initial
member recruitment
Like any grassroots party, the NSDAP developed organically from amongst a handful
of hardcore ideologues, the primary catalyst having been Adolf Hitler. But the
NSDAP did not spring up on its own; it instead arose from out of a party that
already had a platform, leadership core, and small committed following. This
was the German Workers’ Party led by Anton Drexler. Hitler was actually
appointed by the Army to spy on the German Workers’ Party. The Army was
interested in two things: locating nationalists for its own designs and rooting
out Communists who threatened to turn Germany into a subservient satellite of
Moscow. Hitler’s speaking skills and interest in politics led the Army to
select him for this covert task. He took a liking to Drexler and many of his
ideas, so he finally signed up and was issued a membership card with his name
and membership number on it, a tradition that Hitler maintained in his NSDAP.
While Hitler began his political career as the propagandist for the Workers’
party, he was quick to identify the party’s main problems: it appealed to too
few and had no outreach venue other than speaking engagements, which were often
drab. He therefore focused on developing his own talents, which surpassed
Drexler’s, and forming his own designs for the Workers’ party; hence the birth
of the NSDAP. Hitler was quick to capitalize on Drexler’s connections to
wealthy Thule Society members. He did not join Thule, but requested their
patronage. They alone significantly enhanced the potential for what was now his
party to appeal to upper-class Germans, who, in turn, also helped fund the
party. After he quit the Army, Hitler threw himself into the development of the
NSDAP with unbounded determination.
While Drexler and his core focused entirely on winning over German workers,
Hitler had eyes for larger audiences and outreach. His relationships with White
Russian émigrés, wealthy Thule members, and especially Gottfried Feder
(economist) and Dietrich Eckart (philosopher and writer) proved invaluable in
his acquisition of the bankrupt Völkischer Beobachter (VB). Feder
together with two other early NSDAP members owned 30,000 shares of the VB.
Dietrich Eckart was able to obtain a loan for RM 60,000 from the sympathetic
General Ritter von Epp to acquire the VB. The rest of the RM 120,000
price tag came from an industrialist named Dr. Gottfried Grandel, who was won
over by Hitler’s personal appeal to him. Eckart likely helped out too, along
with Dr. Gutberlet (who pledged RM 5,000).
According to the Pools, Hitler’s early supporters came from a wide range of
classes, nationalities and ethnic backgrounds. Numerous wealthy White Russian
émigrés, who had Thule contacts, formed an alliance with the NSDAP and
allegedly raised “vast sums of money” for Hitler—i.e. according to an official
1923 file note. There was Henry Ford, who was anti-Jewish and wished to spread
his message to receptive nations. Benito Mussolini’s personal agents were known
to have established contact with NSDAP members in Germany, likely in order to
arrange the transfer of financial support from the Duce. The Russian Grand
Duchess Victoria, who was pro-monarchy and anti-Bolshevik, gave Hitler money.
Sir Henry Deterding of Royal Dutch Shell Corporation offered Hitler vast
amounts of money in 1931, ‘32 and ‘33 in exchange for a guarantee that he would
regain his expropriated oil interests from the Bolsheviks at some future point
in time. The amount was likely between 30 and 55 million pounds sterling.
Deterding was so pro-German that he ended up marrying a National Socialist
woman and even moved to Germany. He, like so many other German elites, realized
that only an assertive foreign policy could secure Germany’s economic survival
in a world in which France and England had a monopoly over one-quarter of the
globe and were determined to crush Germany’s global competitiveness.
The Germans had tried everything else, including complying with the
Versailles reparations, which was de facto theft. This “treaty” was in
fact designed with one goal in mind: the permanent crippling of German
industrial competition. Ernst Röhm was a fervent German nationalist who
channeled Army funds to the NSDAP via various front organizations. The Thule
Society, which was pan-Germanic and nationalist, not only contributed members to
the NSDAP but helped it raise a lot of money. The two German jewelers Josef
Füss and Herr Gahr supported Hitler. A certain Mr. Pöschl, a small businessman,
gave to Hitler early on. Quirin Diestl was another early supporter who gave
small funds. Oscar Koerner, a toy shop owner, likewise gave money to the NSDAP.
Dr. Friedrich Krohn, a dentist, gave as much as he could. Adolf Müller helped
the NSDAP keep the VB going by endlessly extending credit to Hitler. Ms.
Hoffmann, the widow of a headmaster, contributed regularly. Numerous friends of
General Ludendorff, a Thule member, provided the NSDAP with funding. A
significant number of prominent foreigners and German nationals living or
working in Austria, Britain, Czechoslovakia, Finland, France, Italy, Holland, Hungary,
Switzerland, Sweden and America gave Hitler money, much of it via Winifred
Wagner, Kurt Lüdecke and Hungarian nationalists like Gömbös. The German Free
Corps members gave Hitler money, and so did many Stahlhelm members. Several
right-wing German business interests, such as Emil Kirdorf of the covert
Ruhrlade group, gave Hitler money, along with many business interests that
usually supported Alfred Hugenberg (a man who tried to use Hitler for his own
ends). There was also General Ritter von Epp, who helped Dietrich Eckart and
the NSDAP purchase the VB; Dr. Emil Gansser, who had connections to wealthy
Protestants; Admiral Schröder, a former naval commander; Baron Sebottendorf,
who had connections to J. F. Lehmann (a Thule member, financier and publisher
for the German Navy) and sympathetic naval officers; Herr Schaffer, who
acquired weapons for Hitler’s SA; Kurt Lüdecke, and through him two Jewish arms
dealers who were either 1) not privy to who Lüdecke was or 2) had no reason to
fear Hitler (this was the early 1920s after all); possibly the Duke of Anhalt
and Count Fugger; Ernst Hanfstaengl, a wealthy Harvard graduate with numerous
American connections and some wealth of his own; the wealthy Magda Quandt, who
married Joseph Goebbels and who had elite connections; Fritz Thyssen, who later
denied that he gave substantial sums to Hitler and Göring, in 1929 and off and
on throughout the 1930s, both of whom he liked very much; and so forth.
No Warburgs. No Rothschilds. No Rockefellers. While the Rockefellers
indirectly came into Hitler’s financial sphere by way of Standard Oil technical
investments and the Warburgs via I. G. Farben and J. H. Stein later on,
neither gave Hitler any financial support before 1933. And neither directly
supported or paid Hitler at any point in time. The Sidney Warburg story is pure
fabrication. Fritz Thyssen and some of Hugenberg’s heavy industrial
connections, not James Warburg, gave Hitler substantial monetary gifts in 1929
(at least RM 1,250,000) and Deterding and several German coal companies took
care of Hitler in the early 1930s. While Hitler spent a vast amount on
campaigning, he was by no means rolling in untraceable money. All of his
funding was carefully accounted for and most of it came from VB advertising;
party dues, insurance, and speaking fees; Gregor Strasser’s left-wing faction,
which received RM 10,000 per month in 1931; the good will of VB publisher Adolf
Müller; and the financial frugality of party treasurer Franz Schwarz, whose
meticulous party financial records were destroyed. The Americans interrogated
him so brutally that he died in 1946 in British captivity. His records denoting
even Hitler’s anonymous donors never turned up anywhere. The Pools suspect that
the American occupiers destroyed them.
As for Goebbels’s remark on 17 January 1932 that the finances of the party
“suddenly improved,” this was not exactly true. The truth is that the party’s
credit line suddenly improved, and this was thanks to the maneuverings of Franz
von Papen and Baron Kurt von Schröder with his syndicate of investors,
including a number of prominent heavy industrialists, the Hamburg-America
Steamship Line, the Stein Bank of Cologne, Commerz und Privat Bank, the
Gelsenkirchen Mine Company, Deutsche Bank, Reichskredit-Gesellschaft Bank,
Allianz Insurance, members of the potash industry, the Brabag Coal Company,
Deutsches Erdöl, and a number of other brown-coal industrialists. While Hitler
tolerated fifth-column banks like M. M. Warburg and the Temple Bank (a special
account created for the Temple Society by the Reichsbank to fund Ha’avara
emigration), he eventually restricted and regulated their business
opportunities and forced them to assist with financing Jewish emigration.
Hitler’s goal was to increasingly inhibit and thereby financially squeeze the
foreign banks until they were unable to exist any longer and had to relocate
outside Germany—the same policy he employed to encourage Jewish emigration and
business closures. One such example was the Germanization (i.e. German
takeover) of two Jewish ironworks plants in the Rhön region in 1937.
Moving on to the actual recruitment process, potential recruits were
approached on the streets and at meetings and speaking engagements. They were
given flyers or pamphlets. Sometimes Hitler or other core members of the party
were invited to speak or converse privately with industrialists or nobles who
were interested in a non-Communist, nationalist party. Contrary to myths like
that concerning Sidney Warburg, Hitler and the right-wing faction of the NSDAP
did not receive as much industrial or banker funding, before 1933, as the
Strasser brothers, the Social Democrats (SPD) or even Hugenberg’s Nationalist
Party. The reason why Hitler and the NSDAP never received the same level of
financial or moral support early on was three-fold: (a) the industrialists and
many Junkers did not trust Hitler given his socialist stance on many issues;
(b) most industrialists and Junkers were not financially threatened enough to
back a revolutionary party like Hitler’s (they were still satisfied with the
status quo); and (c) they were leery of his anti-Jewish stance.
Back to recruitment: most potential recruits and financial supporters heard
about Hitler and the NSDAP via word of mouth. Nothing else was as effective as
this. When men like Scheubner-Richter, Schacht, Borsig, Kirdorf and Thyssen
recommended the NSDAP and personally endorsed Hitler, wealthy and other upper-
and middle-class Germans were willing to seriously consider Hitler and his
party. Hitler was invited to speak to heavy industrialists in 1927 by word of
mouth in fact. He even wrote a secret pamphlet intended only for this
industrial-capitalist audience, which they then passed around to others.
Besides active word-of-mouth campaigning, the NSDAP also placed posters
everywhere they could, promoted speaking engagements and other party activities
and viewpoints in their newspaper, sold various odds and ends to raise small
funds (e.g. various items like soap with NSDAP packaging), and sent wealthier
members abroad to raise funds from German expats and foreign sympathizers. Kurt
Lüdecke excelled at this form of campaigning.
In the very beginning, Hitler and the NSDAP targeted veterans, farmers,
workers, young men, noblemen and -women, small businessmen and -women and
pensioners. These were the social classes who were initially the most
receptive, due to the economy and prevailing anti-monarchism, but later on
Hitler’s support base included wealthy elites, heavy industrialists, fascist
and monarchist foreigners, landed Junkers, veterans’ organizations, the German
Army and Navy and even Montagu Norman, a prominent English banker and personal
friend of Hjalmar Schacht who, according to both his private secretary Ernest
Skinner and Émile Moreau, despised Jews, the French and Roman Catholics. He
unabashedly refused to assist France’s treasury with anything and proved
willing and able to arrange financing for the NSDAP by way of his connections
to Bruno von Schröder (Schroder Bank), Kurt von Schröder (Stein Bank) and the
Bank of England (F. C. Tiarks and M. Norman himself). Norman had strong
sympathy for the Germans which dated back to his days as a student in Dresden,
and naturally offered to financially assist and thereby stabilize the new
government that his friend Schacht had openly supported since 1931. Since
Hitler was hostile to France (he saw the French as Foreign Enemy Number One),
friendly to Britain (which he did not feel was a threat), and discriminatory
towards Jews, the three things that Norman found favorable, he recommended that
Kurt von Schröder extend credit to Hitler’s party, which now controlled the
government. Schacht was Hitler’s de facto lifeline in this respect, a
nationalist German banker who had his own designs for German recovery, but who
was also personally impressed with Hitler’s speeches and mass appeal, which no
other politician possessed.
As for Hitler’s initial support, many farmers were burdened by debt, and
most, including landed Junkers, felt threatened by Communist expropriation and
insufficient protective agricultural tariffs. The veterans were receptive
because they felt betrayed by the ruling class, especially the
liberal-democrats of the SPD, and because they had a difficult time finding
work. Workers, who were mostly young men, were receptive because they felt they
were being exploited by the business class, but primarily because they were the
most negatively affected by the inflation and unemployment. Pensioners on fixed
incomes were receptive to Hitler’s socialist stance. Noblemen and -women were
interested in Hitler because he opposed Freemasonry and expropriation of their
landed estates, and because he hinted at restoration of the monarchy.
Additionally, all of these groups generally opposed Marxist-Communism. Most of
the German masses were not interested in a revolutionary bloodbath or
agricultural collectivism, but economic and social security as well as justice
and prosperity for themselves; the German elites did not support expropriation
and collectivization. Hitler’s main opposition in the formative years came from
the Communists, who denounced him as a tool of capitalism and from the former
nobility; the heavy industrialists, who distrusted his socialism and the SA
(they feared the SA was nothing but a Communistic horde); and the left-wing
faction within his own party, who questioned Hitler’s financial sources and
pro-business stance.
When someone requested to join the NSDAP, one paid one’s initial annual
dues and was then given a membership card and asked to perform some service or
task for the party. This could be anything from putting up posters before
speaking engagements to spreading the word by simply talking about the NSDAP or
handing out flyers on street corners and at beer halls. After the
Hitler-Strasser break, he or she was asked to swear allegiance to Adolf Hitler.
Vetting was likely performed by those members doing the actual talking and
recruiting in the streets, as there was no known formal vetting procedure. As
long as a person paid his annual dues and served the party loyally, he or she
was trusted. Those who wished to break with the party were actually told to
leave by Hitler himself at a rally that took place after the Strasser and
Stennes affairs. We’ll revisit this topic later on.
Along these lines, Kurt Lüdecke, Otto Wagener and Ernst Röhm played leading
roles in arming, training and drilling SA men. Their personal fundraising;
their secret dealings with the German Army (Reichswehr), which had many
prominent sympathizers of the NSDAP and SA; and Lüdecke’s connections to
black-market Jewish arms dealers proved essential to building a credible
paramilitary threat to the status quo. The government in Berlin tended to
ignore SA violence against Communists because it opposed a Communist takeover.
Also, Hitler’s party supported German national unity at all costs, so Hitler
and his SA were worth tolerating to prevent Bavarian secession. Hitler’s real
bargaining base was his SA and the masses. Without both, he could afford to be ignored
by the elites, government and industry; however with both he was a true threat,
like the Communists. Lüdecke, Wagener and Röhm all led, at one point or
another, regular drilling and paramilitary basic training at a large hall
funded by party members and various supporters. Marching in formation and
drills also took place in the forests and countryside when possible, but mostly
it occurred in the party’s own rented hall or on a wealthy sympathizer’s
private estate. Fortunately for unemployed and poor members, the party paid for
everyone’s uniforms.
When SA and SS ranks were introduced, the requirements were loyalty and
leadership aptitude. The SS consisted of men handpicked by Hitler himself.
Thus, he vetted them personally. As a matter of fact, Hitler usually personally
appointed leaders to their positions even in the SA. He recalled Röhm from
Bolivia, for instance, to reorganize and lead the SA. Hitler tended to choose
people who he felt would resist falling prey to groupthink. Historians have
tended to characterize this as Hitler’s “divide and rule” policy, but in-depth
study of the party’s early development suggests instead that Hitler chose
people who would (a) not challenge or question his leadership, and (b) not fall
prey to the “yes man” temptation. This appointment procedure did two things: it
prevented serious intraparty division by subordinating all to Hitler himself,
while at the same time it encouraged intraparty rivalries, which prevented
groupthink. Leaders could disagree and even challenge one another’s authority
without destroying the party. Hitler based promotion solely on performance, not
status. This tendency increased later on during the war especially after Hitler
established the NSFO (National Socialist Commanding Officer Corps). This
NS-high command was likely enacted to replace or take over the OKW (Armed
Forces High Command). Hitler wanted select NSFO officers to undergo a 4- to
18-hour course in political-ideological instruction. He himself appointed the
head of the NSFO, Hermann Reinecke, in December 1944.
The NSDAP expanded into cities and states outside of Munich (Bavaria),
where it had its Brown House headquarters, by appointing certain members to run
party operations and perform party services in their own states, cities, towns
and villages. The most well-known example of an NSDAP member-cum-leader who
acquired almost enough personal power, financial backing and mass following to
challenge Hitler himself was Gregor Strasser. Hitler was able to prevent a
crisis from developing with his gifts for clever maneuvering and personal
appeal, but such risks are inherent in any organization that becomes as
powerful as the NSDAP. And they are risks that must be taken if a party’s
leadership wishes it to develop and grow. Talented, committed and qualified
speakers and leaders were appointed to run operations in every location
possible. But Berlin NSDAP members also traveled around giving speeches and
lectures and soliciting financial support. All speaking engagements required
admittance fees. Hitler himself was constantly traveling and meeting with
workers and elites alike to recruit new members and bolster his finances.
At the end of 1920, the NSDAP had about 3,000 members. Membership then grew
from 27,000 in 1925 to 108,000 in 1928. In August 1931 the NSDAP created its
own intelligence and security sector. Heinrich Himmler established the SD (Sicherheitsdienst)
and Reinhard Heydrich was appointed head of the organization, which was kept
separate from the SS (Schutzstaffel). By the time of the Strasser
crisis, the SA was some 400,000 members strong and the party itself had grown
to 2 million by 1933. In 1932, it was large enough to achieve control of 37% of
the Reichstag.
Here are the election results from 1920 to 1933:
Adapted from James E. and Suzanne Pool. Who Financed Hitler: The
Secret Funding of Hitler’s Rise to Power 1919 – 1933, p. 494.
|
||||||||
Political Parties in the
Reichstag
|
June
1920 |
May
1924 |
Dec.
1924 |
May
1928 |
Sep.
1930 |
July
1932 |
Nov.
1932 |
Mar.
1933 |
Communist Party (KPD)
|
4
|
62
|
45
|
54
|
77
|
89
|
100
|
81
|
Social Democratic Party
(SPD)
|
102
|
100
|
131
|
153
|
143
|
133
|
121
|
120
|
Catholic Center Party (BVP)
|
65
|
81
|
88
|
78
|
87
|
97
|
90
|
93
|
Nationalist Party (DNVP)
|
71
|
95
|
103
|
73
|
41
|
37
|
52
|
52
|
National Socialist Party
(NSDAP)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12
|
107
|
230
|
196
|
288
|
Other Parties
|
98
|
92
|
73
|
121
|
122
|
22
|
35
|
23
|
One can see that the NSDAP lost most of its former 230 seats as of July
1932 to the even more radical-revolutionary Communist Party (KPD) in November
1932, not to conservative Catholics or social-democrats. The conservative nationalists
(DNVP) only gained 15 seats. These results, contrary to most historiography, do
not imply the demise of the NSDAP, but the masses’ disaffection with any party
that was not willing to promise sweeping social and economic change for the
majority, even if change meant bloodshed. Hitler and the NSDAP were not viewed
as extreme enough, so they lost seats to the KPD! This alarmed men like Hjalmar
Schacht and Franz von Papen so much that they were finally willing to give
Hitler the opportunity to become chancellor.
He actually should have received the chancellorship in July 1932 when his
party had the most seats in the Reichstag, but the industrialists and noblemen
surrounding General Schleicher, Franz von Papen and President Hindenburg
opposed his appointment to the chancellorship. So much for James Warburg’s and
the Rothschilds’ “magical funding.”
Hitler faced so much resistance at this stage that he, like others,
resorted to blackmail. Hitler arranged a private meeting with President
Hindenburg’s son Oskar, during which he is suspected to have threatened to
expose his father’s role in the repeated taxpayer bailouts of the Junkers’
mismanaged, bankrupted estates. Since blackmail and intrigue had been used to
cheat Hitler of his due appointment, he decided that he could also play such a
game. Hindenburg appointed him chancellor shortly thereafter, which most
historians claim was at the behest of von Papen. We see that von Papen’s desire
to prevent a Communist majority by giving Hitler the chancellorship was only
partly why Hindenburg appointed him. Hitler won, but not because he received
covert funding. Franz von Papen continued to intrigue against Hitler and urged
industrialists to withdraw their financial support of the NSDAP! The goal of
this so-called “cabinet of barons” was to give Hitler just enough power to
satisfy him personally without actually allowing him to attain a majority
strong enough to overthrow the status quo, but just strong enough to prevent a
Communist majority.
Given this context of stalemate, the speed of the NSDAP’s growth in just 6
years and its subsequent attainment of absolute power were only possible with
an authoritarian leader in a crooked political situation in which blackmail,
corruption and political sleight-of-hand were the order of the day. What had
started as a democratic-style workers’ party with a simple executive committee
to which Hitler was appointed in the early 1900s became an authoritarian-style
organization with its own uniforms, offices, training facilities, insurance
company, merchandise, newspaper, propaganda machine, army (the SA) and security
apparatus (SS and SD). This was nothing short of impressive and most of the
credit for its success goes to those leaders and members like Hitler, Hess,
Gansser, Eckart, Funk, Schwarz, Feder, Keppler, Himmler, Rosenberg, Goebbels,
the Strassers (before 1932), Scheubner-Richter, Hanfstaengl, Lüdecke, Göring
and Röhm, all of whom literally devoted their lives to the party.
NSDAP events were staged as often as they could be afforded. The newspaper
was of course always available—it was a daily—so the public and members always
knew what was going on from day to day. Hitler gave speeches and met with
important wealthy persons almost non-stop after his release from prison. He was
keen enough to purchase motor vehicles, which were rare in those days. Speedy
travel was vital to defeating rival parties like the Communists, who still had
to walk to their various speaking engagements and meetings. The NSDAP’s doors,
so to speak, were always open to receive new recruits. Interested persons
either signed up at simple on-site recruitment centers or they mailed their
applications to the party’s headquarters in Munich.
Inconvenient
facts about Hitler and the NSDAP
The following is a list of important facts gleaned from the Pools’ Who
Financed Hitler. This list clarifies and summarizes our introduction to the
NSDAP’s development, support and financing. More importantly, this list exposes
numerous myths associated with Hitler and the NSDAP, such as Hitler’s
“militatarism,” NSDAP funding via Paul or Sidney (James) Warburg and the
Rothschilds, and Hitler’s unpopularity amongst most Germans.
· Gustav Stresemann was as militarily inclined as Adolf Hitler. Thus the idea
that Hitler’s appointment to the chancellorship meant war in future is moot.
· Upper-class hostages, including members of Thule, were literally lined up
and murdered in 1918 by the Communists. A total of 12 hostages were shot in a
schoolyard in Munich.
· The Pools noted that since the German economy was not harmful to most
industrialists’ profits overall, they as a group wished to uphold the status
quo. And that was the problem with them from the perspective of
revolutionary parties like Hitler’s, as well as the impoverished, unemployed
millions.
· Hitler and Hess, not Göring and Goebbels as claimed by “Sidney Warburg,”
solicited money in 1929. German industrialist Emil Kirdorf likely gave the
NSDAP money at this time.
· Radek, Levine and Axelrod, all Communists, were Jewish. These three men and
the terror they inflicted upon Fritz Thyssen and his father personally,
including imprisonment and death threats, changed Thyssen’s life. From that
point on he supported Hitler, and fervently so.
· French martial law and Ruhr resource demands were too much for Fritz
Thyssen. He was arrested and fined 300,000 gold marks for encouraging German
workers to passively resist French military occupation. The French opened fire
on these German workers killing and wounding hundreds.
· Thyssen downplayed his support of the National Socialists. He gave
1,250,000 Reichsmarks between 1928 and 1929. This was the exact timing of
Sidney Warburg’s alleged covert cash transfers to Hitler.
· Kirdorf had Jewish friends and bank connections, including Dr. Arthur
Salomonsohn. In spite of these big money connections, Kirdorf gave very little
to Hitler and the NSDAP.
· Thyssen and Kirdorf saw little hope for Germany. France and England had a
monopoly over one quarter of the world and were determined to crush Germany’s
global competitiveness.
· The Versailles Dictate was Germany’s economic end—really, truly and
totally.
· The “Treaty” was actually an economic weapon designed to permanently
cripple Germany as an industrial competitor. Germany’s total reparations
payments amounted to $32 billion, which equates to $425 billion today, or $6.6
billion per year.
· The NSDAP was not put into power by international Jewish interests as some
researchers suggest. The NSDAP fought for its power. For example, in just a
single street battle between the National Socialists and Communists, 300 men
were killed. Hitler struggled for 14 years to achieve power and was nearly shot
dead during his attempted putsch, facts which challenge this thesis.
· The I. G. Farben conglomerate and high finance never factored into
the Hitler-NSDAP equation before 1933.
· According to the Pools, since nothing Germany did had worked to relieve the
unemployment and trade imbalance, an imperialist policy was necessary for
Germany’s economic survival. She had earnestly tried everything else.
· Big business’s main motive for supporting Hitler and the NSDAP was to
prevent Communism at all costs.
· General von Seeckt operated under a façade of pro-democracy (like Hitler)
until the day when all democratic chains could be broken. Indeed the intellectual
demilitarization of Germany was, to von Seeckt, the greatest threat of all.
· Russo-German military collaboration was championed by von Seeckt, not
Hitler, and started in 1921. (Before the Treaty of Rapallo). Von Seeckt was
instrumental in this collaboration. Lest we overlook it: Hitler, and no one
else, had a reserve army—the SA. Thus the years 1921 to 1922 saw some degree of
Russian funding of the NSDAP via the Reichswehr’s secret Russian collaboration
efforts.
· The Allies destroyed Krupp’s industry, which provided Krupp with a key
motive for later supporting the NSDAP. Krupp, with the help of foreign
subsidies, established anonymous companies to carry out arms construction and
testing in neutral countries long before Hitler came to power.
· Stresemann, like Hitler, wanted to see Germany reemerge as a world power.
Neither von Seeckt nor Stresemann was a liberal-democrat (i.e. neither
supported democracy, which was imposed upon Germany against her will.)
· Holding companies were used to rebuild the German Navy in the early 1920s,
long before Hitler’s ascension.
· “Liberal-Democratic” Weimar Germany was providing covert assistance to
German rearmament efforts in every way possible. Krupp was subsidized by the
Weimar regime, not by Hitler.
· Given the industrial context of that time period, Thyssen’s industry would
die without total rearmament. This was a consequence of Germany’s
overdependence on industrialization,. As suggested by Lawrence Dennis in The
Dynamics of War and Revolution, a developed nation like Germany had the
choice to contract severely in every way, including population-wise, or expand.
Most German leaders opted for the latter.
· German rearmament began earnestly “production-wise” in 1928—five full years
before Adolf Hitler was appointed chancellor.
· The Social Democrats, SPD, supported rearmament.
· Rearmament does not prove that Germany was planning aggressive warfare or
that Germany was “militaristic.”
· Both France’s and Poland’s militaries were threatening to encircle and
occupy Germany in 1919.
· All of the German power elite had the same goal, only different methods of
achieving that goal—to reestablish Germany as a world power. However, only
Adolf Hitler understood international power politics or “economy by the sword.”
Hitler asked the industrialists in 1927: Does it benefit our nationality
now or in the future, or will it be injurious to it? Expediency is the basis of
all alliances.
· France, not England, was Enemy Number One in Hitler’s view.
· Political bribes were not illegal in the Weimar Republic.
· The rule of special interest groups and the power of money (with which to
buy Reichstag deputies) destroyed the Weimar Republic’s chances of survival.
Both are, in fact, inherent features of all democracies, which intentionally
give the masses the illusion of power and voice in government to prevent their
discontent.
· The SPD was the political instrument of the trade unions and the
bureaucracy of organized labor. All of the rest, save the KPD, were big
business’s interest groups incognito.
· Walther Rathenau set the Weimar “big business” precedent, not Hitler or the
NSDAP.
· The Ruhrlade was a secret society of heavy industrialists, with 12 members,
who met secretly to set joint economic and political policy.
· Hugenberg and the Nationalist Party had far more big business and discreet
financial backing and prestige than the NSDAP. But not even Hugenberg was an
industrialist's tool. He opposed the Anglo-Freemasonic Dawes Plan while several
of his industrialist backers supported the plan.
· The Anglo-Freemasonic Young Plan was enacted 11 years after the war, which
demanded that Germans pay “reparations” for the next 59 years!
· Hugenberg and Strasser both underestimated Hitler. He was no one’s “pawn.”
This was already evident around the time of the passing of the Freedom Law in
1929, right around the time of Sidney Warburg’s alleged cash promise to Hitler.
The Warburg myth was used to discredit Hitler by the Strasser-Stennes faction
of the NSDAP. Stennes, with 80,000 SA men under his command, seized the NSDAP headquarters
in Berlin and occupied it to destroy Hitler, but Hitler was able to largely
circumvent recapturing the headquarters via violent means by establishing his
right of ownership of the Berlin headquarters. He did this simply by presenting
his ownership proof to the courts after the holidays ended. The police were
therefore obliged to retake the headquarters for him and Captain Walther
Stennes’ attempted anti-Hitler coup fell apart. Interestingly, Stennes was
never even an NSDAP member.
· Hitler used Karl Lüger’s methods: utilize the existing implements of power.
· Thyssen admitted to funding the NSDAP. His continuous support and Hitler’s
strategic alliance with Hugenberg and the Nationalist Party meant money for
Hitler in 1929—none of which was from Sidney Warburg.
· After 1930, the Völkischer Beobachter generated day-to-day revenue
and paid off all of its outstanding debts.
· There was no “secret” funding early on. Max Amann mortgaged all of the
NSDAP’s property and forestalled all financial obligations until after the
elections in 1930, which surprised everyone, including Hitler. Rallies and
occasional donations by the wealthy supplemented funds after September 1930.
· NSDAP memberships swelled due to the “bandwagon effect” after the party’s
huge electoral success. The VB also started generating substantial
advertising revenue. At one point Hitler actually let his prohibitionist
idealism go too far with the brewers and they canceled all their VB ads.
Fellow party members had to coax them back.
· Adolf Müller helped the Nazis with the VB, the only paper that did
not drop in circulation after the Depression began.
· The United States likely destroyed Party Treasurer Franz Schwarz’s records,
which were meticulous: Hitler had even told him to denote names of anonymous
donors! All of the records are gone. Americans brutally interrogated Schwarz
and likely murdered him in 1946. The Anglo-Americans were determined to
incriminate only German big business for funding the NSDAP at the IMT.
Given that the United States did this, one suspects that there was more
American-based funding than just Henry Ford and Teutonia behind the NSDAP, but
what that was we will never know. The Anglos were likely trying to cover up
American industrial involvement with NS-Germany after 1933, such as that of
Standard Oil which we’ve already discussed.
· Generals, namely Alfred Jodl, were won over by Hitler at his Leipzig trial.
· Big business was reassured by Hitler’s total party control and
non-Communist stance after he ordered his 107 deputies to vote against the
Nazis’ own “left-wing” bill, introduced by Strasser et al.
· The German economy was controlled by the government and a private bank
cartel 2,500 banks strong before Hitler assumed power.
· In the summer of 1931, the Ruhrlade made its first contribution to the
NSDAP, and Göring was being paid by Thyssen at this time as well.
· Frau Quandt joined the NSDAP in 1930 and brought lots of wealthy influence
with her.
· Hitler recalled Ernst Röhm in 1930 to lead the SA. He had been living in
Bolivia.
· Kaiser Wilhelm and his sons supported the NSDAP in an effort to try and
convince Hitler to reestablish the monarchy.
· Brüning was a de facto dictator but was failing, because the
Depression was worsening.
· The Credit-Anstalt, a Rothschild bank branch in Austria, experienced a
devastating run in May 1931, which crashed all German banks and eventually even
London’s banks. So much for the Rothschilds’ endless, untouchable wealth!
· Freemasonic France and America exacerbated the German collapse by recalling
short-term loans to Germany and Austria and with the passing of the
Hawley-Smoot tariff.
· The German People’s Party, which enjoyed more conservative support than
Hitler, demanded constitutional revision terminating the parliamentary system
and giving Hindenburg the power to appoint a government.
· Other nationalist parties got a lot more money and support than Hitler, but
they maintained the status quo and displeased the masses immensely. Thus only
Hitler had the masses’ support and could therefore not be brushed aside or
ignored, not even by the moneyed elite.
· Big business, namely industrialists, was paying the NSDAP by 1931.
· The Harzburg Front organized and rallied in 1931. Hjalmar Schacht gave a
speech at this event and shockingly declared that the Weimar government was
truly and utterly bankrupt. He, more than anyone else that day including
Hitler, brought incalculable benefit to the NSDAP. He was after all the man who
had saved the German economy before by introducing the Rentenmark.
· Hitler had his man Keppler meet informally with businessmen to create the
NSDAP’s economic policy. This was known as the “Circle of Friends for the
Economy.” This is actually where Reinhardt comes into play, the man behind the
Reinhardt Plan which Hitler enacted shortly after coming to power. Reinhardt,
not Hitler or an NSDAP member, openly called for rearmament in 1932.
· Walther Funk met with Kurt von Schröder, a partner in J. H. Stein of Cologne.
A man with great skill for negotiation, Funk was able to “satisfy Schröder” of
Hitler’s “good will” towards “international banking.”
· Mussolini gave unofficial support to the NSDAP. France backed the Bavarian
separatists while Italy supported the Bavarian nationalists. Hitler was the
only nationalist who opposed France and was willing to let Italy keep control
of the South Tyrol (with a population of 250,000 Germans).
· Hitler received Italian fascist funding, which only came to light in 1932.
Mussolini also sent the NSDAP weapons in the 1920s.
· The U.S.-based Teutonia gave Hitler regular donations.
· Montagu Norman was the governor of the Bank of England for 24 years. He was
anti-France, disliked Jews immensely, was opposed to Versailles, and favored
Germany due to his earlier studies there. Norman lent money to the Nazis after
1933 via his personal friend Schacht. He may have channeled funds via
Baron Kurt von Schröder and J. H. Stein and Company in 1932, but this is
not proven. Schröder was a German partner in J. H. Stein.
· Viscount Rothermere of the Daily Mail gave Ernst Hanfstaengl money.
He was a staunchly pro-German Anglo who despised Jews.
· It is crucial to understand that Anglo-Saxon foreign policy was designed to
prevent any single power—whether France, Germany or Russia—from attaining
formidable power enough to rival that of Britain. This was the real reason why
King Edward VIII was forced to abdicate; he was simply too pro-German. His
sympathy as well as that of Montagu Norman, the Mosleys, the Mitfords and
Viscount Rothermere made Hitler miscalculate on Britain. He thought he had more
Anglo-Saxon support than he really did.
· Deterding met Alfred Rosenberg in Britain and likely promised him funding.
Deterding controlled oil interests in Romania, Russia, California, Trinidad,
the Dutch Indies and Mexico. He also had pumps in Mesopotamia and Persia. The
Soviets seized his oil fields in Baku, Grozny and Miakop and nationalized them,
thereby becoming a serious competitor to Deterding with his own former oil
lands.
· Georg Bell was Deterding’s contact agent with the NSDAP. Deterding did not
just back the NSDAP, but also White Russians and Ukrainian nationalists, as
well as anti-Soviet Georgian rebels.
· Deterding married a pro-National Socialist woman and moved to Germany. He
was the one who gave the real ‘big money’ to the NSDAP in 1931, 1932, and
1933—£30 to £55 million. Dr. Kahr claimed that French money flowed to Hitler
after going through nine exchanges, but this has not been proven. In fact,
Bavarian parties like the BVP were backed by France only because they wished to
break away from Berlin!
· The Treaty of Trianon was even worse and more unjust than Versailles.
Hungary lost population and territory and was completely impoverished. This
treaty soured most Hungarians on democracy. In 1919, Bela Kuhn ruled ruthlessly
for three months in Hungary: he confiscated and expropriated private land, slaughtered
peasants indiscriminately and further destroyed the economy, which resulted in
famine. Hungarians were overwhelmingly anti-Communist, anti-Freemason and
anti-Jewish after that. Most of these Communists, including Bela Kuhn, were
Jewish Freemasons. This experience is what led the Hungarian nationalist Gyula
(Julius) Gömbös to finance the NSDAP.
· Hitler aimed for “careers open to talent” according to Otto Dietrich, a
policy opposed to hereditary power.
· Here is the explanation for one of Goebbels’s economic improvement
references in his diary: Hitler’s Düsseldorf Industry Club speech of January
27. This fundraising event explains Goebbels’s entry of February 8.
· To give people some perspective on the German economy before Hitler: there
were 17,500,000 unemployed Germans over the winter of 1931 to 1932. This was
nearly one third of the entire population of Germany!
· Stennes’s rebellion is very important, but all too often overlooked.
Stennes was a paid agent of Strasser and Captain Ehrhardt, both of whom had big
business (industrialists) and one (Otto Wolff) Jewish backers.
· As a result of this rebellion and other street violence, the SA, SS and HJ
were all banned by a Brüning decree signed by President Hindenburg. This was in
1932. So much for Rothschild and Warburg supporting Hitler! Why would they let
their “pawn” get banned? This ban was an attempt to destroy the NSDAP and
Hitler for good. Besides, if Hitler was really just a “tool” of a vast
international entity as researchers like Jim Condit and Guido Preparata
suggest, then why didn’t he win the presidency in 1932? What was this entity’s
motive for forestalling his “power grab” if it was in fact behind him?
· Paul Silverberg, Jewish, financed Gregor Strasser, not Hitler. Silverberg
was head of the R.A.G., one of the largest coal companies in the entire world.
He supported the chancellor ruling by presidential decree (Brüning in
particular).
· Brüning, not Hitler, asked the question: is democracy able to work in
Germany?
Concluding
thoughts
Paul Silverberg was extremely liberal, except for his own business
enterprise. He naturally favored “equal rights” for Jews and big business, but
not for anyone else; he likewise favored “individual rights over national
rights” and was therefore completely opposed to the NSDAP. Silverberg was angry
at Brüning’s ouster. He opposed von Papen, supported General Schleicher as
chancellor, and gave both Schleicher and Hitler’s rival Gregor Strasser large
sums of money.
Gregor Strasser received 10,000 marks per month, beginning in the spring of
1931, for the NSDAP from heavy industry. So much for Sidney Warburg! Walther
Funk got 3,000 marks per month in 1931 and Hitler got 100,000 marks from
various coal companies that same year, shortly before the Reichstag elections.
As one can see his alleged 1931 “miracle financing” was no miracle at all. It
came from German coal companies, not Sidney Warburg. In fact, most of the
NSDAP’s money came from the party itself: insurance premiums, dues, speaking
fees, etc. Brüning, not Hitler, was backed by I. G. Farben. Chancellor
Schleicher, with Silverberg’s and other industrial bigwigs’ money, conspired
with Ernst Röhm on a plan to incorporate the SA into the German Army and
thereby betray Hitler.
Clearly, Franz von Papen was no puppet either, contrary to the thesis of
Guido Preparata (Conjuring Hitler). He refused to lift the SA ban until
June 15. He also banned political parades until after 30 June 1932 and made
himself Reich Commissioner of Prussia. He enjoyed widespread support among
industrialists, big business, Hindenburg and the Army officer corps. His intent
was to block Hitler from ever attaining more than nominal power in government.
Hitler was so financially strapped thanks to this intrigue against him that he
ended up signing contracts amounting to giving away everything the party owned
to finance his 1932 election: he won over 13 million votes and 230 seats in the
Reichstag. This was nothing short of impressive. He should’ve been appointed
chancellor right then and there.
The real question was whether Hitler could be bought. That was the question
that Franz von Papen and Chancellor Schleicher were asking. Since it did not
seem likely, both opposed his chancellorship as long as possible. Von Papen
conceded in the end: he wanted power for himself and he did not want a
Communist majority in the Reichstag. By agreeing to appoint Hitler chancellor
in 1933, von Papen thought that he could satisfy Hitler’s personal power needs
and keep the NSDAP in check, while at the same time use Hitler’s party as a
means to prevent the Communists from ever achieving a majority. Only Hitler had
the mass following to pull off such a plan. And only von Papen could secure for
Hitler the appointment, funding and support of industrialists he needed to
become chancellor with a stable government. Indeed Hitler deserved the
chancellorship, and was fully entitled to it, since he had the masses’ support
and the largest number of seats in the Reichstag. The rest, as they say, is
history.
Sources:
· Dennis, Lawrence. The Dynamics of War and Revolution. New York:
Revisionist Press, 1975.
· Gregor, Dr. A. J. National Socialism and Race. London: Steven Books,
2009.
· Pool, James E. and Suzanne Pool. Who Financed Hitler: The Secret Funding
of Hitler’s Rise to Power 1919 – 1933. New York: The
Dial Press, 1978.
· Pudor, Dr. Heinrich. “The High Financiers of France.” In Warwolves of
the Iron Cross: The Hyenas of High Finance, edited by Veronica Kuzniar
Clark and Luis Muñoz, 51-66. United States: Vera Icona Publishers, 2011.
· Schinnerer, Erich. German Law and Legislation. Edited by Richard
Mönnig. Berlin: Terramare Publications, 1938.
· Schwarz, Dieter. Freemasonry: Ideology, Organization and Policy. 6th
ed. Berlin: Central Publishing House of the NSDAP, 1944.
· Schwarzwäller, Wulf. The Unknown Hitler: His Private Life and Fortune.
Translated by Aurelius von Kappau. Edited by Alan Bisbort. Bethesda, Md.:
National Press Inc and Star Agency, 1989.
· Warburg, Sidney. The Financial Sources of National Socialism: Hitler’s
Secret Backers. Translated by J. G. Schoup. Palmdale, Cal.: Omni
Publications, 1995.
Copyright © 2011. Veronica Kuzniar Clark. All Rights Reserved. None of this
text may be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication, or
redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium without prior permission
from the author. Please e-mail Inconvenient History for contact information.
The full introductory text is featured in The Nazi SS Manual on Freemasonry
(Martinson Edition) by Dieter Schwarz.
No comments:
Post a Comment