by Eric Thomson (1999)
Orwell
warned us that tyranny begins with the abuse of language, and that “who defines
controls.” With these thoughts in mind, we need to take another look at some
important political terms which have been so loaded with connotations by
propagandists posing as historians, entertainers, teachers and journalists that
a loaded word tends to preclude our thinking. Instead, our thinking should be
stimulated toward achieving solutions to the social/national problems now
confronting us.
Consider the word, “socialism”.
Proponents of various political ideologies have tried to monopolize this word
to define their specific and often divergent social programs, while other
political ideologists, who are equally socialistic in their thinking, deny that
they are socialists, and seek to label their opponents with the term. In practice,
socialism addresses any society, whether that society be monarchistic,
theocratic, democratic, plutocratic, kleptocratic, anarchistic, etc. Society
appears to have natural limits as to inclusivity, as we see in the Balkans and
India, where distinct societies live within uneasy proximity to one another,
maintaining their separate and distinct identities despite centuries of
coexistence and race-mixing. Social-thinking and so-called socialist programs
cannot be applied outside of the society in question. These practical limits
were demonstrated in World War I with the most recent collapse of international
socialism, which was premised on the myth of international working class
solidarity. The various proponents of this Second International Socialism betrayed
their principles in favor of their respective national loyalties, which caused
millions of working class men to be killed in the ensuing war. World War I was
the graveyard of nationalism and international socialism.
That disaster led to the formation
of Third International Socialism under the Jew, Vladimir Ulyanov, alias
Lenin. Like all internationalist doctrines, this kosher brand of socialism was
a cloak for Jewish imperialism: universalism on behalf of tribalism. Mussolini,
a long time socialist, saw that nationalism could be the only basis for
socialism. When things were serious, people fought for their own kind and not
for some utopian scheme of unrealized possibilities. Mussolini’s Fascism was
basically an economic system based on the real constituencies of the Italian
state: the land owners, industrialists, workers, peasants, the army, the
monarchy and the church. The previous de jure regional constituencies of
the Italian parliament were irrelevant, and Italy was frozen in a state of
governmental gridlock, with strikes, lockouts, growing poverty and disorder. So
it was that the King of Italy appointed Mussolini his prime minister, for he
had nothing to lose. As history teaches, Mussolini got Italy working
harmoniously, not as a dictator, but as an arbitrator who worked to achieve a
consensus from Italy’s disparate classes and interest groups. Because Mussolini
depended on consensus derived from a balance of power, his rise was swift and
easy, just as his fall was swift and easy.
Hitler had also learned hard lessons from history. He
was also a social thinker and saw great strength in the mating of two major
political ideas: nationalism and socialism, both of which had huge numbers of
adherents in postwar WW I Germany. Instead of basing his state on economics,
Hitler based the new German state on race. National Socialism was, in practice,
a form of totalitarian populism. It was far more democratic than any regime in
the U.S.A. or Britain, and it was also more authoritarian, in that the leaders
were authorized to fulfill their responsibilities and were also accountable to
their people. Savitri Devi said that National Socialism was a temporal
expression of cosmic truth. For these reasons, it took the Jews and their
minions much greater effort to remove Hitler from office than it did Mussolini.
So-called internationalism is really
Jewish imperialism. The Jews have long used such internationalist ideologies as
Communism, Christianity and Capitalism to achieve their goal of world
domination. Jewish imperialism or Zionism, uses any tool to bring about The Jew
World Order and the enslavement of mankind, just as a carpenter uses any tool
to build a cabinet, whether it be a saw, a hammer, a drill, a plane, etc. A
wise observer does not say that the woodworker is a ‘driller’, a ‘planer’, a
‘sawyer’, etc, but a carpenter. A wise political observer will not view a
seeker of world conquest as a Christian, a Communist or a Capitalist, but will
understand that the user of these means is a Jew or Zionist who seeks to
achieve, as an end, world conquest and enslavement. Jews have always used other
peoples as their agents toward the achievement of their evil ends. These
peoples are called “golem“, a murderous monster which kills the Jews’
enemies toward the advancement of Zionist domination. The British were the
Jews’ golem in the l9th century and the Americans are their golem
of the 20th century. Of course, the golem are unnatural creatures, so
they destroy themselves as they obey their Jew masters. Will the Chinese be the
Jews’ golem in the 21st century? Stay tuned!
No comments:
Post a Comment