By Hervé
Ryssen
Judaism is
not merely a “religion,” as many Jews are overt atheists or agnostics, and they
do not consider themselves less Jewish for all that. Jewry is also not a race
even if it is true that a “trained eye,” most of the time, can recognize a
Jewish appearance, that is to say, a characteristic pattern which is the result
of their strict observance of endogamy for centuries. Jews see themselves as
the “chosen ones” of God, and marriage outside the community is strictly
frowned upon. However, mixed marriages do exist and have also helped to renew
the blood of Israel during all the centuries spent in the various ghettos where
the Jews preferred to live, separately and apart from the rest of the
population. The essential condition for such mixed marriages is that the mother
be Jewish, since Orthodox Rabbis recognize as Jewish only the child born of a
Jewish mother. However, having just a Jewish father or grandparent can suffice
for a person to identify completely with Judaism. Jewishness is therefore a
“mental race” that has been shaped over the centuries by the Hebrew religion
and the universalist project of Judaism.
Judaism is a Political Project
Judaism is essentially a political
project. It is important for Jews to work toward the emergence of a world at
“peace,” a peace meant to be universal and permanent. It is therefore not a
coincidence that this word “peace” (shalom in Hebrew) is found
frequently in Jewish discourse worldwide. In the perfect world that they are
building, all conflicts will disappear between the nations. This is why Jews
have been militating tirelessly for many years for the abolition of all
borders, the dissolution of national identities and the establishment of a
global empire of “peace.” The very existence of separate nations is considered
to be responsible for the triggering of wars and turmoil. so they must be
weakened and eventually replaced by a world government, a “one world
government,” a “New World Order,” one single world-ruling authority that will
permit happiness and prosperity to reign, Jewish-style, on earth.
We find this idea more or less
developed both in the writings of certain intellectual Marxists such as Karl
Marx himself and the Jewish-French philosopher Jacques Derrida and also in the
discourse of liberal thinkers such as Karl Popper, Milton Friedman and France’s
Alain Minc. The idea is to unify the world by all means necessary and to
generate cultural conflicts that will weaken nation-states. It is for this One
World that intellectuals Jews labor tirelessly all over the world. Whether they
call themselves left- or right-wing, liberal or Marxist, believers or atheists,
they are the most ardent propagandists of the pluralistic society and of
universal miscegenation, that is of racial mixture.
Thus, all their strength the Jews –
basically, ALL the vocal Jews in the world – encourage non-white immigration
into every country in which they are located, not only because the
multicultural society is their fundamental political aim, but also because the
disintegration of national identity in each nation and the massive presence of
anti-white immigrants is designed to prevent the original white population from
succeeding in any nationalistic outbursts against the Jewish sway over finance,
politics, and the media. All Jewish intellectuals, without any exception, are
focused on this question of building the “pluralistic society” and for this
they practice constant “vigilance against racism.” In France, influential
writers and journalists such as Bernard-Henri Levy, Jacques Attali, Jean
Daniel, Guy Sorman, and Guy Konopniki agree on pluralism and anti-racism
despite their political divergences in other areas. This obsession, which is
very characteristic of Judaism, is also manifested in movies, where many
producers and directors are influential Jews. As soon as a film starts
defending and promoting interbreeding, “tolerance” and pluralism, we can be
sure that the producer of it is Jewish.
Now we can understand better why the
former communists and leftists of the 1970s did not have to make such a big
leap to become today’s “neoconservatives.” They have merely switched to a
different strategy to achieve the same goal: the rule by racially pure Jews
over a racially mixed society.
The fact is that after the
Palestinian intifada began in October 2000, the Jews in France and the rest of
the Western world have realized that nowadays the danger to their interests and
their project comes primarily from Islam and from young African immigrants,
both Arabic and black. Their aim is to strengthen the modern race-mixing and race-blending
society, which they have contributed so much to establish in our country of
France. But this mosaic now threatens to break up into separate communities,
and this the Jews do not want. They want no separate identities or separateness
at all, except a separate Jewish identity and Jewish separateness. Former
Marxists in France such as Alexandre Adler, André Glucksmann, and Pascal
Bruckner thus support nowadays, along with Alain Finkielkraut, the right-wing,
pro-Washington, pro-Zionist party of Nicolas Sarkozy. And yet they have not
become French patriots. They react only for the exclusive benefit of Jewry,
asking, as American Jews proverbially do on every issue: “Is it good for the
Jews ?”
“Tolerance” as a Weapon
The members of the Jewish sect are
the most proselytizing people on earth, but unlike Christians or Muslims, who
dream of converting all peoples of all races to their faith, the Jews have no
plan to convert the world to their own faith, Judaism, but simply to encourage
other nationalities to give up their national and religious identities – and
live only for the goal of “tolerance.” The unceasing campaigns to blame all
Whites for slavery, colonialism, the plundering of the Third World or for
Auschwitz have no other purpose than putting the opponent on the defensive, and
getting him on his knees not by violence but via guilt. When the Jews are the
only people left on earth who are keeping their faith and their traditions,
they will finally be recognized by everyone as God’s “chosen people.”
Their “mission” (and Jews frequently
use this term “mission”) is to disarm the other peoples, to dissolve anything
which is not Jewish or Jewish-controlled, to grind the people down to a powder
for making a new identity-free work force, and thus to favor a universal
“peace” among the peoples who have no more “divisive” identities.
As their prophet Isaiah said: “The
wolf shall dwell with the lamb, the tiger will rest with the kid, the lion and
the ram shall live together, and a young child will lead them” (Isaiah 11:
6-9). The Messiah, coming from Israel, and awaited for three thousands years,
will establish anew the kingdom of David and will give the Jews an empire over
all the earth. And certain Jewish texts explicitly call for this.
Jews are therefore continuously
encouraged to campaign, in whatever society they inhabit, in order to promote
the unification of the world – and thus to also hasten the arrival of their
promised and cherished Messiah. Propaganda is a Jewish specialty, and it is no
coincidence that Jews become so influential in all the media. In their hands,
the concepts of “tolerance” and “human rights” have become incredibly efficient
weapons of white guilt and accusation against the majority culture. In fact, it
is not through Jewish-sounding names or a Jewish physical appearance that we
can best recognize Jews, but rather from what they write and say wherever they
are on earth.
Selective Amnesia and Fabulation
Many Jews, as we know, played an
absolutely huge role in the Soviet tragedy 1917-1991 and the thirty million
deaths that marked this era. Let us remember that Karl Marx was born into a
Jewish family and that Lenin himself had a Jewish maternal grandfather, that
Leon Trotsky, the Bolshevik founder and head of the Red Army, was born a
Bronstein, while Kamenev (real name: Rosenfeld) and Zinoviev (real name:
Apfelbaum) were running the two Bolshevik-conquered capitals of Moscow and St.
Petersburg. But the list of Jews who stood out in the mega-crimes of Communism
is endless. It must be said and it must be repeated: Jewish officials and
Jewish torturers bore a very heavy responsibility in this tragedy. The
“perfect” world they concocted and which was supposedly “historically
inevitable” turned out from the very beginning to be a nightmare for the
Russian population. It was not until 1948 when the Jewish intellectual elite
Jewish began distancing itself from the Stalinist government, and this was only
because Stalin had launched his “anti-Zionist” campaign, meant to purge
pro-Israel Jews from senior leadership positions.
This indisputable Jewish guilt for
the gigantic crimes of Bolshevism is now systematically being shoved down the
Memory Hole (the phrase from George Orwell’s 1984). In Alexander
Solzhenitsyn’s 2002 book Two Centuries Together, the Nobel Laureate
and 11-year veteran of the Bolshevik gulag expresses outrage that Jewish
intellectuals were still refusing to recognize their ethnic responsibility in
the slaughter of millions of Christians. Solzhenitsyn also denounces modern
Jews who pose as victims of an “antisemitic” Bolshevik government when that
government was in fact heavily Jewish and Jews were among the worst
perpetrators.
This selective amnesia is necessary
for a people who ceaselessly proclaim their “innocence” of any provocative
acts, as we regularly note in their writings, for example in an editorial in Israel
magazine of April 2003, “the first Israeli monthly magazine in
the French language” written under the name of a certain André Darmon.
He wrote: “To kill a Jew or a child
makes God cry, for we are exterminating [in the Jew] the bearer of universal
ethics and innocence.”
No less!
With this mindset of absolute
innocence Jews cannot conceive bearing any responsibility for their atrocities.
Jews are only victims, only “scapegoats” in an evil and hostile world. But very
soon the Messiah will punish the “wicked” and will restore the victimized sons
of Israel to their full rights.
Nevertheless, in this same Israel
magazine editorial, a certain Frederick Stroussi asserted that the Nazi
government was worse than the Stalin regime. He quoted the cruelties he claimed
were perpetrated by certain SS men. For example, we learn from Stroussi that
the Latvian SS man Cukur’s hobby was to toss Jewish babies in the air to shoot
them in their head as in skeet shooting. He also writes of other episodes, such
as the rape of children by the SS before they killed them. The Second World War
has certainly stimulated the fertile imagination of the children of Israel.
Or perhaps this imagination is once
again a case of the Jews’ own “projection” syndrome, that is, accusing others
systematically of one’s very own crimes as a matter of consistent PR policy:
always attack. We know in fact – even if the media never speak about it – that
many Jews and their rabbis are involved in the felony crime of pedophilia (see Psychanalyse
du Judaisme, 2007).
And murdering a child would seem to
be more a Jewish specialty than a characteristic of the SS mind. The
revelations of tenured professor Ariel Toaff of Bar Eilan University in Israel
– the son of the former Grand Rabbi of Rome – and buttressed in February 2007
by his 147-page, heavily footnoted, scholarly work Pasqua di Sangue [ Blood
Passover] – reveals proof of ritual murder among some Ashkenazi Jews (Jews
of Eastern European origin).
Emotional Fragility
We outsiders are thus supposed to
understand that the sufferings of Jews cannot be compared to those of any
others. As a consequence, we are supposed to get as indignant as they do when a
serious historian such as Stephane Courtois states (in the preface of his
famous Black Book of Communism): “The death of a Ukrainian child of
Kulak origin [ from the independent farmer class] who is deliberately forced to
starve to death by the Stalinist government is as significant as the death of a
Jewish child in the Warsaw ghetto.” These simple words were enough to provoke
the ire of Frederic Stroussi who declares he was “stunned” by such an affront.
Such a remark, according to him, was “despicable” and represented a vulgar
attack against Israel: “What does this comparison have to do here?” he writes.
“Why do we have to use the slaughter of a Jewish child to transmit this
underlying, false and hateful rumor that the Jews overshadow all other victims
of totalitarianism and monopolize all the attention on themselves?”
The author of the article, as we can
notice, reacts in a outraged and totally disproportionate way to the modest and
certainly justified intentions of the level-headed historian Stephane Courtois.
Stroussi demonstrates here the “great intolerance to the frustration” which are
so characteristic of the Jewish intellectual. Such reactions are clearly not
“normal.”
We note that Israel magazine
is a monthly magazine designed for the Jewish community and that, consequently,
one can hardly accuse Frederick Sroussi of lying to goyish readers, or
hiding from the goyim the true nature of Bolshevism and the supposedly
malefic cruelty of the SS. His discourse here does not correspond to any false
dialectic, as anti-Semites claim, but here, in this magazine by and for Jews,
he is reflecting, as a Jew among Jews, writing to Jews, the very essence of
their soul: 1) We are always innocent – and 2) Jewish lives are more valuable
than those of others.
There is an “attack anti-Semitism”
that stems from a failure to understand the Jewish identity and only sees
deliberate perfidy where there is in reality a genuine existential anxiety, one
generated by a deep psychological dysfunction.
Hysterical People
The Jews have never dared to
collectively approach the mirror on their inner lives represented by Freudian
psychoanalysis, a prism through which the Jews claim to see all humanity, but
which, on closer analysis, sheds far more light on the specific neuroses of
Judaism. Psychoanalysis, like Marxism, is a “Jewish science” and a product of
the Jewish mind. It was therefore logical to wonder how this Freudian
“discovery” corresponds to Jewish specificities.
The answer was not initially obvious
to the author, and it took the reading and analysis of hundreds of books of all
kinds, mostly written by Jews themselves, for him to realize that the searing
question of incest stands at the throbbing heart of the Jewish question, and
not theoretically either.
Jewish mothers do love their sons,
as is well known, but outright incest is at the origin of a well-known mental
illness – one that especially afflicts Jews – called “hysteria.” Incest
attracted early the attentions of Freud while he was developing his theories. The
parallels between Judaism and hysterical pathology are quite natural.
Jewry is well-known for these
syndromes: Hysteria, depression, introspection, amnesia, manipulation,
pathological lying, ambivalent identity, prophetic deception, sexual ambiguity,
and so on. Every Jewish symptom is found in hysteria.
Freud, as a loyal Jew, merely
projected the traits of a specific community onto the rest of humanity. In
reality, there is no “Oedipus complex” but rather an Israel complex (all Jews
together technically being Israel, not just the Near Eastern state). In fact,
Jews do not seem to really wish to discuss the topic of incest within their
families. On the other hand, all the psychiatrists mention: “The hysterical
woman so much wants a child from her father or her doctor that she can persuade
herself that she is pregnant by one of them and thus develops a ‘nervous
pregnancy.’”
It is interesting that all Jewish
writers use the same term to refer to the coming of their Messiah, namely, the
“delivery” of the Messiah. The whole Jewish community, we must understand, is
“the wife of God” (the Shekhinah of the Kabbalist) who is some day
supposed to give birth to the Messiah, and thus the whole of Jewry is indeed
suffering from a “nervous pregnancy” not unlike that found in nervous,
hysterical women.
Karl Kraus, the Austrian Jewish
journalist who did not agree with Freud, wrote sarcastically: “Psychoanalysis
is the mental illness of which it claims to be the cure.” But the right and the
best formula can be stated in ten words: “Judaism is the disease that
psychoanalysis is meant to cure.”
The Sexual Revolution
After Freud, other Jewish thinkers
came along who produced a symbiosis between Freudian doctrine and Marxism.
Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse preached sexual revolution in order to break
down the patriarchal family and unleash “free sex.” Their theories largely
inspired the student riots of May ‘68. The 1970s saw a new wave of
Freudo-Marxism and Jewish women were in the forefront (such as Gisele Halimi
and Elisabeth Badinter in France and Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan and Gloria
Steinem in the USA). As time passed, a series of Jewish-inspired laws appeared,
one after the other, designed to dissolve the family. In France, a
Neuwirth-promoted law legalized the contraceptive pill (1967), then came the
challenge to the authority of the father as head of the household (1970), then
divorce by mutual consent (1974) and the “right” to abortion promoted by
“Holocaust survivor” Simone Veil (1975). A great wave of movie porn accompanied
this “liberation” from traditional family values. Here we are compelled to note
that Jewish producers and film directors play a very important role in the sex
film industry. (See my La Mafia Juive [The Jewish Mafia], 400
pages, 2008). Parallel to this, the Freudian concept of bisexuality favored the
acceptance of overt “gay pride” and homosexuality.
A War Machine against Humanity
In fact, the only tangible results
of this moral “liberation” was the systematic demoralization and criminalization
of the white man, who is denounced tirelessly in movies, literature and history
as the cause of all the planet’s ills and of the collapse of the West. The
appeal of egalitarianism – as intended by Jewry – tends to level all ethnic
differences and identities and brings about their slow destruction.
Yitzhak Attia, director of
French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem Holocaust institute in Tel Aviv
wrote this himself in the same issue of Israel magazine:
Even if reason tells us, even shouts
with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small
and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all Jewry worldwide, not just “the
State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as absurd, as incoherent and as
monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the
Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and
their identities.
You read it right : Between the
Jewish people and the rest of humanity the struggle can only be “genocidal and
total.” The “peace” which Israel intends to confer is no more and no less than
“genocide,” the warrant for the execution of all humanity – except for those
allowed to live as cultureless slaves.
The Neutralization of the Devil
The question is whether the
aggressiveness of Judaism can be neutralized in order to save humanity from its
evils, evils that could prove even more serious than Marxism such as
psychoanalysis and the ideology of globalism. First of all, we must face the
facts: After all these centuries of mutual misunderstanding, the anti-Semitic
Christians, the Muslims, and Hitler have all failed to resolve the Jewish
question. The fact is that the Jews feed on and grow off the hatred they have
engendered among all the peoples of this world. This hatred, it must be said,
is vital for their survival and for their spiritual genetics. It has allowed
them for many centuries now to close ranks within their community against an
external enemy, while other civilizations have disappeared.
For their part, the rabbis spare no
efforts to keep their gene pool Jewish. And so even a renegade Jew remains a
Jew, and therefore it is perfectly useless to attempt to leave the Jewish
prison community. Judaism is indeed a prison. Claiming that a Jew cannot ever
stop being Jewish works in favor of Jewry’s survival.
Our mission must be to accommodate
these sick among us, because the Jews are not “perfidious” people as much as
they are sick people to be cured.
Jews are to be loved individually
and sincerely in order to free them from the prison in which they are locked.
Only then will they become free from the cult’s grip – and from the threat they
pose to themselves and to all humanity.
Only then we will become free from
this grip, and at the same time, they will free themselves from the evil inside
them that threatens all mankind.
No comments:
Post a Comment