By
In my article ‘The High
Culture of the Germanic Peoples‘ I already mentioned the Jewish myth of
patriarchy (i.e. the theory that Capitalism was invented by the
Indo-Europeans). There I also explained why this is only a deception to deflect
the guilt away from the Jews. For those who have not read it, I quote myself
here:
[…] even Jewish scholars admit
that usury was invented in the Semitic kingdom of Sumer[15], the same kingdom
which invented the first crucified deity[16]. The currency of this kingdom was
the Shekel, dedicated to the crucified goddess Inanna[17], who went through a
passion and resurrected. Shekel is, as we know, the Jewish name for money to
this day.
In contrast to that,
Indo-European civilizations were so averse to usury and swindles that even
paying taxes was regarded as a sign of slavery and they knew only the reverse
of taxation, that is, the government handed over goods to the citizens from
time to time[18].These taboos against usury were so stark that they persisted
throughout most of European history.
The privatizing of common
goods, the exclusion of women from social life, the heritability of privileges,
and the extortion of usury, those evils came to Europe from the Orient, through
three ways:
· A Jewish religion called
Christianity, which hates Nature and Beauty.
· Roman law, intended for
forcing the life together of total strangers in cities.
· Classical Greco-Roman culture,
developed by narcissistic elites, wanting to justify their cosmopolitan
fetishes.
Some kind of proto-capitalism
was indeed spreading itself in antiquity, but this was a gradual process during
many thousands of years. This Capitalist trend came from the Orient, with its
epicenter in the Semitic kingdoms around ancient Israel, and the Indo-Europeans
were not their bearers but another victim of it.
This Oriental capitalism
profited from race-mixed societies and multicultural empires, finding its most
powerful expression in Christianity. This bedded the seeds for a world
subjugated by a few ‘chosen ones’, where autochthonous cultures are
replaced with Consumerism and the sacredness of life with machines.
Our Jewish patriarchs look
forward with all means to make ancient history confusing and inaccessible to
the masses, while deferring the guilt of these developments to White people.
Now the purpose of this short
essay is to explain in the most concise form possible why Communism is a
swindle in order to foster Jewish Capitalism.
As his favorite student
(Margaret Mead) pondered about the subject of his dissertation, Franz Boas gave
her not only a subject, but actually told her what her work should demonstrate
before she had even begun to research! She should demonstrate that among the
primitive peoples there was some kind of Communism with no private property, no
sexual roles and no violence whatsoever. Needless to say, all revisions of her
work demonstrated she had falsified information and even invented parts of her
accounts.
Later anthropologists who
visited the same islands of Samoa, found nowhere such Communist arrangement of
society and to this day, no-one has ever found a society with those
characteristics.
This example is illustrative
of the methods used in academia when it comes to ideologically loaded subjects.
We know, for example, that Karl Marx envisioned with his Ancient Communism also
a secular version of ‘the fall of man from paradise’. This Ancient Communism
was some kind of paradise, supposedly lost by the arrival of warrior nomads,
and only when humanity unites itself again into a universal, global community,
with no private property, then salvation can be found.
This international Communism
looks in practice no different from Capitalism, where a few Oligarchs have
concentrated so many riches that the rest of humanity have no private property
anymore (the destruction of all social classes) while an insatiable market has
removed all national barriers (internationalism) with its expansion.
The essence of Capitalism has
actually always been ‘the war of classes’ and ‘internationalism’ (the same
banner-words of Communism). The war of classes means that the poor are being
constantly exploited because of their belonging to another class, while the
rich identify with rich people of other countries, allying with them in order
to make the market into an international business.
Such a war of classes didn’t
exist among our ancestors because all members of the society identified
themselves as a race or folk, regardless of their position, thus the goal of
this war of classes, as proposed by Marx, is clearly to destroy that cohesion
and separate the world into people with property and the rest who have neither
property, nor culture, nor ancestry.
It seems that the last thing
Marx wanted was a world separated into races and sub-races, as it is natural.
Many Communists believe to this day that the source of Capitalism and economic
oppression is ‘racism’, something totally absurd and preposterous because
almost without exception all evils like the slave trade, colonialism, etc. have
been predestined by a expanding market and alimented by greediness.
It is only as an afterthought
when unscrupulous elites justify their enterprises in the name of religion,
human rights or global justice. A good example is the conquest of Mexico, led
in the name of a universalist religion of love (Christianity), and Hernan
Cortez didn’t seem very racist when he begot many sons among the Aztec Indians
(who later became nobles!) and he must have believed White culture is superior
when he decided to spend the rest of his life among the Aztecs with little
contact with European culture or other White people.
Racial consciousness, or the
desire to live among Whites, would never lead to miscegenation or economic
dependence from non-Whites. I have never encountered a National Socialist who
loves living in a country where the majority are poor non-Whites.
When different races want to
exchange goods without mixing, the only way is actually to respect each other’s
sovereignty, in contrast to the holy duty of conversion, mandatory for someone
who believes in universal equality and universal solidarity.
Thus, when modern communists
blame racism as the source of economic oppression, while promoting
internationalism as the solution, it is no different than the Spanish priests
who condemned the lot of the Indians, while converting them into the church,
which financed and ideologically justified their enslavement.
In this context is important
to mention that one of the greatest insights of Hitler was the realization that
with all promises of universal brotherhood and peace there always came some
kind of Versailles Treaty. This Versailles Treaty can be evident or it can be a
hidden one, for example in the ever-raising rates of usury we unknowingly pay in
everything we buy. The central point remains always the same: Universalism
leads to the concentration of riches and the reduction of humanity into
destitute tribute payers.
***
Continuing with how Communism
would look in practice: ‘The rule of the proletariat’ would mean that a
racially mixed humanity, without property, believes through propaganda that
they rule (just as modern democracy), and they are so culturally impoverished
that they don’t even know of the existence of these Oligarchs.
Another interesting parallel
between Marx’s ideal world and modern Capitalism is consumerism. Marx promoted
a materialistic view of morality and culture. Only when every person in this
planet could afford to buy anything they wished, could we talk about fairness.
This resembles of course the situation today, where we have destroyed all
Nature and all culture (real wealth as opposed to artificial wealth) just to
produce en masse all kinds of useless, ugly and unnecessary things, which only
calm a few seconds the addictive impulse of consume, as promoted by
capitalistic corporations.
Karl Marx had also a linear
vision of time in which the flow of history led irrevocably to a Communist
world-government. This linear conception of history is, of course, the same we
find in the Old and New Testaments, and a global rule of Communism reminds us
of a global rule of Christ as also prophesied in the Bible.
It is interesting, though,
that the Bible puts this global rule of the Jewish god as a preamble to the
intentional destruction of our world by this same god. In an ironic way, it
seems that the Jewish prophets got it right when they connected globalism with
the total destruction of our environment and life.
The essence of life is
differentiation and separation, first into species and then into races, as a
mechanism which makes sure no life forms overwhelms this planet. We could
fairly say that an artificial ideology that attempts to unite all humanity is
the antithesis of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment