Part II
„Journalists, editors, and politicians for that matter, are going to
think twice about criticizing Israel if they know they are going to get
thousands of angry calls in a matter of hours. The Jewish lobby is good at orchestrating
pressure...Israel’s presence in America is all-pervasive...You don’t want to
seem like you are blatantly trying to influence whom they [the media] invite.
You have to persuade them that you have the show’s best interests at
heart...After the hullabaloo over Lebanon [cluster bombing civilians, etc.],
the press doesn’t do anything without calling us for comment.“
„Allowing NBC to televise this matter [revelations about former Prime
Minister Peres formulating the U.S. sale of weapons to Iran] is evidence that
some U.S. agencies are undertaking a private crusade against Israel. That’s
very severe, and is something you just don’t do to a friend.“ (Chicago
Tribune 11/24/84)
Israel was caught stealing U.S. technology for cluster bombs and
chrome-plating cannon barrels. Subpoenas against Israeli citizens were dropped
by „our“ government after Israel pledged to „co-operate.“ (Chicago
Tribune 11/24/86).
„All I had held against the Jews was that so many Jews actually were
hypocrites in their claim to be friends of the American black man...At the same
time I knew that Jews played these roles for a very careful strategic reason:
the more prejudice in America that could be focused upon the Negro, the more
the white Gentile’s prejudice would keep...off the Jew.“ (New York Magazine, 2/4/85)
„The role of Jews who write in both the Jewish and [American] general
press is to defend Israel.“ (Commentary of Editor Norman
Podhoretz)
„Much of what you have read about the war in Lebanon -- and even more of
what you have seen and heard on television - is simply not true.“ (New
Republic Editor-in-chief Martin Peretz)
„The use of force, including beatings, undoubtedly has
brought about the impact we wanted -- strengthening the [occupied] population’s
fear of the Israeli Defense Forces.“ (Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin)
„If we’d like to launch a war against the Washington
Post, we’ll pick the time and place.“ (Spokesman for the Israeli Embassy)
„...[Israel] is able to stifle free speech, control our Congress, and
even dictate our foreign policy.“ (They Dare to Speak Out, Paul
Findley)
The stage was set for the Pied Piper of Harvard to
lead a parade of mesmerized youth to a new dimension of spiritual experience
that science had told them did not exist. Timothy Leary’s LSD (along with the
other psychedelics) turned out to be the launching pad for mind trips beyond
the physical universe of time, space, and matter to a strange dimension where
intoxicating nectars were abundant and exotic adventures the norm. For millions
it was a ‘mind- blowing’ experience that forever changed their world view.
The Beatles played a key role in leading a generation
of youth into drugs. Leary, just back from India, called them ‘the four
evangelists.’ Relaxing in his tepee and listening to the Beatles’ album
Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, Leary said, ‘The Beatles have taken
my place. That latest album - a complete celebration of LSD.’ The Rolling
Stones and other big-time Rock groups were evangelists also. In 1969, Life
magazine quoted Rock star Jimi Hendrix: ‘...through music, you can hypnotize
people...And when you get [them] at [their] weakest point, you can preach into
the subconscious minds what we want to say.’ He was frank to admit, ‘Definitely
I’m trying to change the world.’ Lloyd Richards, dean of the Yale School of
Drama, has said, ‘The arts define whatever [the] new society is that we’re
evolving...’ The awesome power of music to mold the thinking of the masses (and
particularly of its youth) has been demonstrated by those who unquestionably
knew what they were doing. Crosby, of the Crosby, Stills & Nash group
boasted:
‘I figured that the only thing to do was to seal their
minds. I still think it’s the only thing to do. ...I’m not talking about
kidnapping... [but] about changing young people’s value systems...’
All of the above were Jews!
„Within the studies and on the screen, the Jews could simply create a
new country - an empire of their own, so to speak, one where they would not
only be admitted, but would govern as well. The would create its values and
myths, its traditions and archetypes.“ (An Empire of Their Own [How the Jews
Invented Hollywood], by Neal Gabler (Crown
Publishers, inc. N.Y. Copyright 1988, pp. 5-6)
„Television has allowed us to create a common culture, and without it we
would not have been able to accomplish our goal.“ (American
Story, Public Television, Dr. Morris Janowitz, Prof. of Psychology, Chicago
University, December 1, 1984)
„An intelligent man, thoroughly familiar with the newspapers, can, after
half an hour conversation, tell anyone what newspaper he reads...even high
prelates of Rome, even Cardinals Amette and Mercier show themselves more
influenced by the Press of their country than they themselves probably
realize...often I have noticed that it is according to his newspaper that one
judges the Papal Bull or the speech of the Prime Minister.“ (J.
Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, 1920; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by
Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 171)
„The corruption does not consist in the government exercising influence
on the Press; such pressure is often necessary; but in the fact that it is
exercised secretly, so that the public believes that it is reading a general
opinion when in reality it is a minister who speaks; and the corruption of
journalism does not consist in its serving the state, but in its patriotic
convictions being in proportion to the amount of a subsidy.“ (Eberle,
p. 128, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 128; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution,
by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 173)
„The great telegraphic agencies of the world which are
everywhere the principal source of news for the Press (just as wholesale
businesses supply the retailers), which spreads far and wide that which the
world should know or should not know, and in the form which they wish, these
agencies are either Jewish property or obey Jewish direction. The situation is
the same for the smaller agencies which supply news to the newspapers of less
importance, the great publicity agencies which receive commercial
advertisements and which then insert them in the newspapers at the price of a
large commission for themselves, are principally in the hands of the Jews; so
are many provincial newspapers. Even when the Jewish voice is not heard
directly in the Press, there comes into play the great indirect influences,
Free Masonry, Finance, etc.
In many places Jews content themselves with this
hidden influence, just as in economic life they consider Joint-Stock companies
as the most profitable. The editors may quite well be Aryans, it is sufficient
that in all important questions they should stand for Jewish interests, or at
least that they should not oppose them. This is achieved nearly always by the
pressure of advertisement agencies.“ (Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 174)
„The Jewish Press of Vienna sold everything, put
everything at a price, artistic fame as well as success in business. No
intellectual production, no work of art has been able to see the light of day
and reach public notice, without passing by the crucible of the Jewish Press,
without having to submit to its criticism or to pay for its approval. If an
artist should wish to obtain the approbation of the public, he must of
necessity bow before the all powerful Jewish journals. If a young actress, a
musician, a singer of talent should wish to make her first appearance and to
venture before a more of less numerous audience, she has in most cases not
dared to do so, unless after paying tribute to the desires of the Jews.
Otherwise she would experience certain failure. It was despotic tyranny
re-established, this time for the profit of the Jews and brutally exercised by
them in all its plentitude.
Such as it is revealed by its results, the Viennese
Press dominated by Judaism, has been absolutely disastrous. It is a work of
death which it has accomplished. Around it and outside it all is void. In all
the classes of the population are the germs of hatred, the seeds, of discord
and of jealously, dissolution and decomposition.“ (F. Trocase, L’Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris; The Secret
Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 175-176)
„When I first began to write on Revolution a well
known London Publisher said to me; ‘Remember that if you take an
anti-revolutionary line you will have the whole literary world against you.’
This appeared to me extraordinary. Why should the literary world sympathize
with a movement which, from the French revolution onwards, has always been
directed against literature, art, and science, and has openly proclaimed its
aim to exalt the manual workers over the intelligentsia? ‘Writers must be
proscribed as the most dangerous enemies of the people’ said Robespierre; his
colleague Dumas said all clever men should be guillotined. The system of persecutions
against men of talents was organized...they cried out in the Sections (of
Paris) ‘Beware of that man for he has written a book.’ Precisely the same
policy has been followed in Russia under moderate socialism in Germany the
professors, not the ‘people,’ are starving in garrets. Yet the whole Press of
our country is permeated with subversive influences. Not merely in partisan
works, but in manuals of history or literature for use in schools, Burke is
reproached for warning us against the French Revolution and Carlyle’s panegyric
is applauded. And whilst every slip on the part of an anti-revolutionary writer
is seized on by the critics and held up as an example of the whole, the most
glaring errors not only of conclusions but of facts pass unchallenged if they
happen to be committed by a partisan of the movement. The principle laid down by Collot d’Herbois still
holds good: ‘Tout est permis pour quiconque agit dans le sens de la revolution.’
All this was unknown to me when I first embarked on my
work. I knew that French writers of the past had distorted facts to suit their
own political views, that conspiracy of history is still directed by certain
influences in the Masonic lodges and the Sorbonne [The facilities of literature
and science of the University of Paris]; I did not know that this conspiracy
was being carried on in this country. Therefore, the publisher’s warning did
not daunt me. If I was wrong either in my conclusions or facts I was prepared
to be challenged. Should not years of laborious historical research meet either
with recognition or with reasoned and scholarly refutation?
But although my book received a great many generous
appreciative reviews in the Press, criticisms which were hostile took a form
which I had never anticipated. Not a single honest attempt was made to refute
either my French Revolution or World Revolution by the usual methods of
controversy; Statements founded on documentary evidence were met with flat
contradiction unsupported by a shred of counter evidence. In general the plan
adopted was not to disprove, but to discredit by means of flagrant
misquotations, by attributing to me views I had never expressed, or even by
means of offensive personalities. It will surely be admitted that this method
of attack is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy.“ (N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, London, 1924,
Preface; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp.
179-180)
No comments:
Post a Comment