Source: Free
Speech - August 2001 - Volume VII, Number 8
by Dr.
William Pierce
Today I want to talk again about a growing threat to
our freedom in America. In every White society, at all times, there have been
people who valued freedom over comfort and security, and there have been people
who valued comfort and security over freedom. Sometimes there are more of the
one, and sometimes there are more of the other.
When I’ve talked about this
subject in the past, I’ve characterized the freedom-lovers as masculine and the
security-lovers as feminine because under natural conditions men are a bit more
willing to take chances and try new things and want to keep their options open,
and they also are a bit more concerned with general principles, and women are a
bit more concerned with the security of home and hearth - which is not to say,
of course, that even the most adventurous and principled man has no concern for
security or comfort or that even the most home-oriented woman has no concern
for principles. It’s just that on the average men are more freedom oriented,
and women are more security-and-comfort oriented.
As times and manners change,
however, the degree to which men value freedom changes. In America 226 years
ago Patrick Henry proclaimed, „Give me liberty, or give me death,“ and in doing
so he won the general admiration of his fellows and the agreement of a majority
of them. Today many Americans would question his sanity, and more would laugh
or sneer at him than agree with him. Partly this change is the consequence of
dysgenic immigration and breeding policies during the past century, but it is
due more to permissive child-raising practices and a less masculine, less
demanding social and civic environment.
And there’s another reason - a
very important reason - for the devaluing of freedom in recent times, and that’s
the propaganda line of the mass media. The media have worked diligently to
undermine Americans’ attachment to certain specific freedoms - the freedom to
keep and bear arms, for example - and at the same time have twisted and
redefined the whole meaning of freedom, while cultivating a more feminine
ideological climate in America. Sixty years ago Franklin Roosevelt did much to
confuse the concept of freedom in the public mind by classifying comfort and
security as „freedoms“ and then elevating them to the status of freedom of
speech and freedom of religion. He included in his enumeration of his so-called
„four freedoms“ freedom from want and freedom from fear, and the media bosses
loved him for it.
Ever since then they have done
everything they could to further twist meanings and compound the confusion, so
that today the average couch potato or soccer mom can be persuaded easily that
comfort - that is, „freedom from want“ - and security - that is, „freedom from
fear“ - are indeed freedoms in the same sense as freedom of speech, freedom of
assembly, freedom of religion, freedom of self-defense, and freedom from
excessive governmental intrusion.
Really, I have had women - and
men too - seriously defend the notion that freedom of speech needs to be
balanced against comfort, in the form of freedom from feeling bad because of
some „insensitive“ remark by another person. These couch potato and soccer-mom
types will argue, „Well, yes, we have freedom of speech, and that’s important,
but we can’t have people saying or writing things that offend other people,
things that hurt the feelings of other people.“
For the most part, this is
just simpleminded „feel-goodism.“ These soccer moms and couch potatoes just
have very fuzzy notions about concepts such as freedom, and they’ve absorbed
from TV the belief that there really is a „right“ to feel good about oneself.
Imagine where we’d be today if the Americans at Valley Forge in the winter of
1778 had believed that they had a „right“ to be comfortable, and that „right“
was as important as the right to be free from domination by a foreign
government. In the last couple of centuries we have not only become softer
physically and morally, but we’ve become a bit soft in the head as well.
But it’s not just the couch
potatoes: there are smarter people out there whose notions are not fuzzy at all
but who also hate and fear our ideas about freedom. The radical feminists and
the militant homosexuals and many of the leaders of various racial minorities
understand the precariousness of their present positions. They understand that
a very comfortable and confused White society that tolerates their antics now
may someday lose its patience, especially if someone explains things. They
understand that they could very quickly lose all of their unnatural privileges
if someone explains to the public what their behavior is doing to our society.
They begin feeling very
insecure and very uncomfortable when they hear me, for example, talking against
government-imposed sexual and racial quotas. When I ridicule the idea that
America needs more „diversity“ or more female fighter pilots or more Haitian or
Mexican immigrants, they would like very much to shut me up. They are afraid
that other people will listen and will begin thinking. When I say in one of my
broadcasts that a society is sick unto death when its citizens are taught that
there’s nothing wrong with men kissing and fondling each other in public, these
people begin screeching about „hate speech“ and demanding laws to keep me
quiet.
And a lot of the couch
potatoes and soccer moms are ready to go along with them, because they’ve been
conditioned in that direction by the media and the schools - especially if they
have attended a college or university. The radical feminists and the
homosexuals and the non-White militants established a beachhead in the
university faculties and administrations in the 1960s, and since then they have
metastasized to the point where they are the arbiters of Political Correctness
in nearly every university in America.
Well, all of this is bad
enough - on the one hand the positions of influence in our schools and our
government held by freaks of various sorts and by non-Whites and on the other
hand the general softness and state of confusion of our population - but what makes
it much worse and much more dangerous is the campaign by well organized and
well financed Jewish pressure groups to subvert legislative bodies and
law-enforcement agencies at the same time that Jews in the media are continuing
to soften up the public. There is a powerful effort underway now to abolish our
Bill of Rights, piece by piece, both directly and indirectly, and it is
succeeding.
You know, I’ve spoken with you
before about the Jewish and liberal campaign to have more so-called „hate crime“
legislation enacted, at both the state and the Federal levels. That campaign
continues, with groups such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith
presenting their so-called „model hate crime“ bills to legislators everywhere
and lobbying for their enactment. And it’s not just the Anti-Defamation League.
It’s other Jewish organizations too, such as the Southern Poverty Law Center
and all sorts of ad hoc groups. And politicians being what they are these days,
these Jewish groups are having an alarming degree of success. Legislators, who
take an oath of office to uphold and defend the Constitution against all
enemies, foreign and domestic, eagerly subvert the Constitution if it will win
them favor with the Jews. They will enact patently unconstitutional laws
without a second thought if the Anti-Defamation League will give them a pat on
the head for it.
And let me assure you, even
patently unconstitutional laws that should never be able to stand up in court
are dangerous. In the first place, some of them do stand up in court because
the courts themselves have been corrupted. But even when they aren’t
enforceable they intimidate people. No person in his right mind wants to be
charged even under a law that is so clearly unconstitutional that no court will
uphold it, because he can be bankrupted by the legal fees involved in proving
that it is unconstitutional.
At least, there are some more
or less „mainstream“ groups in America that are as strongly opposed as I am to
the whole concept of „hate crime“ laws, although for different reasons, and
these groups undoubtedly have slowed down somewhat the rate at which the
Constitution is being undermined. They could do much more if they weren’t so
terrified of being labeled „haters“ or „anti-Semites“ for daring to take a
Politically Incorrect position.
The Jews, however, are pushing
their campaign to subvert the Constitution at more than one level. While using
their media to persuade the public that everyone will be safer and more
comfortable with more „hate crime“ laws, and lobbying the politicians to enact
the laws, at the same time they have a massive effort underway to infiltrate
and subvert law-enforcement agencies. And in this last effort, which in some
ways is the most dangerous of all, there are no mainstream groups opposing
them.
Here’s the way it works: the
media in a particular area - say, in Arizona or in Michigan - raise the public’s
consciousness of the threat of terrorism. The Jews persuade one of their
favorite Gentile politicians in the area to speak up about the need to be
prepared to deal with this new threat. The politician gives television
interviews and speaks very seriously about the lack of preparedness on the part
of police and other government agencies. State and local police agencies begin
to worry that they will be blamed if they don’t do something to show that they
are taking the threat of terrorism seriously. As a matter of fact, terrorism is
completely new to them. They’ve never thought about it much. They don’t know
anything about it.
Well, guess who comes to the
rescue! An official of the Anti-Defamation League or another Jewish group goes
to see the head of the state police, and he brings along a member of the
Israeli secret-police organization Mossad. The two Jews tell the chief of the
state police that they know all about terrorism and terrorists, and they want
to share their information with him, because of their humanitarian concern for
public safety. The police chief is happy to accept their offer, and so training
seminars are set up. The Jews tell the police officials about terrorism - and
especially about terrorists, about how to spot a terrorist, about what
characteristics to look for.
Usually the irony of the
situation is not even realized by the Gentile policemen. The Mossad is an
organization that engages in state-sponsored terrorism. It commits terrorist
acts on a larger scale than any other organization, including Osama bin Laden’s
group. Its agents sneak into people’s hotel rooms in other countries and plant
radio-detonated bombs under their beds. They put bombs in people’s telephones.
They put bombs in people’s cars. They use exotic poisons to assassinate people.
A couple of Mossad agents got caught in Jordan a couple of years ago when they
tried to murder an Islamic religious leader they didn’t like by squirting
poison into his ear as they passed him on a sidewalk in Amman. And these
professional assassins and terrorists are supposedly teaching our policemen
about how to spot terrorists!
Imagine the police hiring the
Mafia to teach them about organized crime and how to fight it. Do you think
that perhaps the Mafia instructors might tailor their teaching to give the
police only the information that wouldn’t be harmful to the Mafia? Do you think
that perhaps the Mafia might try to use the police for its own ends instead of
being public-spirited and really helping the police fight organized crime?
It is not surprising that what
our policemen learn about terrorism and terrorists from this relationship with
the Jews is a bit one-sided. It is not surprising that the police learn that
terrorists are likely to be Islamic extremists - or even more likely, White
racists. It is not surprising that they learn that White racists and White
patriots - in fact, any groups or individuals who are not Politically Correct -
should be watched carefully, because they might be terrorists, or they might
become terrorists as demographic and social conditions in the country continue
to worsen. People who are opposed to the flood of non-White immigrants pouring
into the country, people who are opposed to continually increasing „diversity“
in America, might become violent, might resort to terrorism, if the government
doesn’t do something to control immigration.
Well, that’s just the
beginning of this worrisome relationship between our police and the Jews. And
you know, when I say „the Jews,“ I don’t mean just the Anti-Defamation League
and the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Mossad. This ongoing subversion of
our Constitution - this assault on our freedom - is also supported by the
Jewish community, by the Jewish tribe, as a whole. The Jewish bosses of the
mass media support it as well as the Jewish pressure groups.
Of course, there are
individual exceptions. There are a few Jews who, for one reason or another,
refuse to march in lockstep with the rest of the tribe. In an earlier program I
told you about Norman Finkelstein, whose book The Holocaust Industry,
exposes the chicanery and fraud of the media Jews and other Jews who have lied
about and exaggerated Jewish losses during the Second World War in order to
gain economic and political advantages for their fellow Jews. Despite
Finkelstein’s dissent, the Holocaust fraud remains a Jewish fraud, because it
is supported by nearly all Jews, not just by Simon Wiesenthal and Elie Wiesel
and a few other professional Holocaust hucksters. I’ve discussed with you
Robert Friedman’s revelations of the Jewishness of so-called „Russian“
organized crime in his book Red Mafiya. But despite Friedman’s exposé,
virtually all the Jews in the controlled media continue to pretend that the
members of the organized crime gangs that came to America from the former
Soviet Union are Russians instead of Jews.
And there are a few individual
Jews who speak out against the campaign to enact „hate crime“ and „speech crime“
laws. They warn that this campaign threatens our most fundamental freedoms. Nat
Hentoff, a Jew who works for the Jewish newspaper Village Voice and has
a syndicated newspaper column, is one of these. Hentoff has for years spoken
out against threats to free speech, and he is speaking out now against the „speech
crime“ campaign being pushed by his fellow Jews.
Of course, Hentoff doesn’t
refer to it as a Jewish campaign, but that’s exactly what it is. I’m happy that
Hentoff is at least speaking out against „speech crime“ laws, but it is a fact
that one cannot really understand what is going on unless one sees the campaign
as Jewish and sees how it meshes with long-term Jewish goals. And one cannot
effectively fight against this campaign unless one is willing to fight against
the Jews as a whole.
Well, I told you that the
Anti-Defamation League’s teaching of law-enforcement agencies about terrorism
is just the beginning. Having established a cozy relationship with police
departments around the country, Jewish organizations next put themselves
forward as experts on „hate crime“ legislation, which is as new and strange to
most law enforcement people as terrorism is. „Hate crime“ and „speech crime“
are the coming things, the Jews persuade the policemen. If you want to stay on
the right side of the media in the future, you’ll be spending much less time
chasing robbers and rapists and instead will be arresting „hate criminals“ and „speech
criminals.“ You’ll need to know how to recognize them. Let us teach you.
And the Jews are teaching
them. In Phoenix, Arizona, the police department has a special „bias crimes
detail“: an incipient thought police unit. Although the Phoenix cops do not yet
have the authority to arrest people for expressing Politically Incorrect
thoughts, they do keep official police records - „information cards,“ they are
called - on people overheard saying things that might be used later as evidence
against them if they ever are charged with a „hate crime.“ For example, a White
man reports to the Phoenix police that he has just been mugged and robbed on
the street by two illegal aliens from Mexico. While the police are taking his
report he says, „I’d like to see all of these wetbacks rounded up and shot.“ An
„information card“ reporting that remark goes into the police files. Two years
later the same White man gets in a fight with a Mexican and beats him up. Has a
„hate crime“ been committed? The „bias crimes detail“ finds the two-year-old „information
card“ in its files and on that basis charges the White man with a „hate crime“
carrying twice the penalty that a simple assault would carry.
And Phoenix certainly isn’t
the only community where the Jews have persuaded the local cops to begin
collecting evidence of what people are thinking so that they can be prosecuted
later. In Laguna Beach, California, Police Chief Jim Spreine encourages
citizens to report to the police any „hate-style comments,“ to use the chief’s
words, that they overhear. People who make „hate-style comments“ are more
likely to commit acts of violence later and so bear watching, the chief told a
reporter for the Orange County Register. And I do not need to tell you
who it is that advises the chief exactly what constitutes a „hate-style
comment.“
This is the sort of thing that
is happening all over America at a rapidly increasing rate. The whole meaning
of law enforcement is being transformed. The police used to protect normal,
law-abiding citizens by locking up violent predators. Nowadays in many cities
the police are doing less of that from fear of being charged with „racism“ or „racial
profiling,“ because violent predators are disproportionately non-White. The
police instead are spending their time watching, gathering information on, and
in some cases arresting White men who are suspected of having Politically
Incorrect attitudes and thinking Politically Incorrect thoughts.
As I told you earlier in this
broadcast, there are two principal reasons for this transformation. One is the
general feminization of America: the shift from a freedom-loving citizenry to a
comfort-loving and security-loving citizenry. The other reason is deliberate
subversion on a huge scale, in which the controlled mass media and Jewish
pressure groups have played the largest role.
If America is to survive much
longer its citizens must once again come to value freedom more than comfort and
security. But before this shift in attitude can be effected, the grip of the
Jews on the mass media and on the political process in America must be broken.
And before that can happen, those Americans who still love freedom must find
the courage to speak out and accuse those who are subverting their country.
Certainly, anger is growing.
The rage is growing. But along with the rage must grow understanding and
courage.
No comments:
Post a Comment