The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Saturday, March 30, 2019
Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Famous People about Jews - Part I
Part I
VOLTAIRE (Francois Marie
Arouet) 18th century French philosopher, writer:
"Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable
result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the
whole human race..."
"The Jewish nation dares to display an
irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters;
always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others,
always barbarous - cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity."
(Essai sur le Moeurs)
"You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The
Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and
more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all
nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to
be punished, for this is your destiny." (From a
letter to a Jew who had written to him, complaining of his 'anti-Semitism.'
Examen des Quelques Objections...dans L'Essai sur le Moeurs.)
CANNOT, E. 19th century French reformer. In La Renovation, journal of
the socialist school of CHARLES FOURIER: "Jews!
To the heights of your Sinai...I humbly lift myself. I stand erect and cry out
to you, in behalf of all my humble equals, of all those whom your spoliation
has brought to grief, who died in misery through you and whose trembling shades
accuse you: Jews! for Cain and Iscariot, leave us, leave us! Ah, cross the Red
Sea again, and go down there to the desert, to the promised land which is
waiting for you, the only country fit for you; o you wicked, rude and dishonest
people, go there!!! ("Israel")
"We come now to the libel involving the gold, the Jewish gold. This
is obviously why the present case is being tried close to the Aurelian Steps.
It is because of this particular charge that you have sought out this location,
Laelius (the prosecutor), and that mob (referring to the noisy crowd of Jews
whom Laelius had assembled to create a commotion at the trial). You know how
large a group they (the Jews) are, and how influential they are in politics. I
will lower my voice and speak just loudly enough for the jury to hear me; for
there are plenty of individuals to stir up those Jews against me and against
every good Roman, and I don't intend to make it any easier for them to do this.
Since gold was regularly exported each year in the name of the Jews from Italy
and all our provinces to Jerusalem, Flaccus issued an edict forbidding its
exportation from Asia. Who is there, gentlemen of the jury, who cannot
sincerely commend this action? The exportation of gold had been forbidden by
the Seanate on many previous occasions, and most strictly of all during my
consulship. Further, that Flaccus was opposed to this barbarous Jewish
superstition was proof of his strong character that he defended the Republci by
frequently denying the aggressiveness of the Jewish mobs at political
gatherings was an evidence of his high sense of responsibility." (Speech
of Cicero, which is one of the few revelations of Jewish subversion which
survived the burning of libraries. The great consul of Rome, Cicero, had to
lower his voice to avoid stirring up the Jews. A Roman aristocrat, Flaccus, was
removed from office and dragged back to Rome to face a false charge. Why?
Because he had tried to enforce the Roman law banning the Jewish traffic in
gold. The outcome of this trial was that Flaccus ban on the shipping of gold
was removed. Thus the Jews won their objective, and Flaccus was lucky to escape
with his life after he had opposed them. (Harry
J. Leon of the University of Texas, p. 3, Jews of Ancient Rome).
"He (Martin Luther) accused them (the Jews) of all those fictitious
crimes which had made Europe such a hell for them. He, too, claimed that they
poisoned the wells used by Christians, assassinated their Christian patients,
and murdered Christian children to procure blood for the Passover. He called on
the princes and rulers to persecute them mercilessly, and commanded the
preachers to set the mobs on them. He declared that if the power were his, he
would take all the leaders of the Jews and tear their tongues out by the
roots." (Stranger than Fiction, p. 249).
"Judaism is a unique gift to this land that people of myriad faiths
and cultures call home ...The Talmudic teachings of mercy and justice, and
those who have sought to uphold these ideals, grace the pages of American
history. We can draw strength and inspiration fromt he enduring lessons of
Judaism, and it is entirely fitting that we honor the great traditions of its
followers." (April 20, 1005 President Clinton signed a
Jewish Heritage Week Proclamation).
This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a
"CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION," at the Philadelphia
Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina: "I fully
agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an
insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews.
"In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have
lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated
themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to
undermine the Christian Religion upon which that nation is founded by objecting
to its restrictions; have built up a state within a state; and when opposed
have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of
Spain and Portugal.
For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their
sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, they call
Palestine. But, Gentlemen, should the world today give it to them in fee
simple, they would at once find some cogent reason for not returning. Why?
Because they are Vampires, and Vampires do not live on Vampires. They cannot
live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people
not of their race.
If you do not exclude them from these United States,
in this Constitution in less than 200 years they will have swarmed in such
great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and change our form
of government [which they have done -- they have changed it from a Republic to
a Democracy], for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our
substance and jeopardized our liberty.
If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our
descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them sustenance, while
they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, Gentlemen,
if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in
your graves. Jews, Gentlemen, are Asiatics; let them be born where they will,
or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise.
Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even though they live
among us ten generations. A Leopard cannot change its spots.
Jews are asiatics, they are a menace to this country
if permitted entrance and should be excluded by this Constitution." (by
Benjamin Franklin, who was one of the six founding fathers designated to draw
up The Declaration of Independence. He spoke before the Constitutional Congress
in May 1787, and asked that Jews be barred from immigrating to America. (The above are his exact words as quoted from the diary of General
Charles Pickney of Charleston, S.C.).
"I believe that the active Jews of today have a tendency to think
that the Christians have organized and set up and run the world of injustice,
unfairness, cruelty, misery. I am not taking any part in this, but I have heard
it expressed, and I believe they feel it that way. Jews have lived for the past
2000 years and developed in a Christian World. They are a part of that
Christian World even when they suffer from it or be in opposition with it, and
they cannot dissociate themselves from this Christian World and from what it
has done. And I think that the Jews are bumptious enough to think that perhaps
some form of Jewish solution to the problems of the world could be found which
would be better, which would be an improvement. It is up to them to find a
Jewish answer to the problems of the world, the problems of today." (Baron
Guy de Rothschild, NBC-TV, The Remnant, August 18, 1974)
"From the days of Adam (Spartacus) Weishaupt, to those of Karl Marx
to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburg and Emma Goldman. This world-wide
conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstruction of
society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and
impossible equality, has been steadily growing...There is no need to exaggerate
the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about
of the Russian Revolution by these international, and for the most part,
atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one: it probably outweighs all
others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading
figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes
from the Jewish leaders." (Winston Churchill, Sunday
Illustrated Herald, London, England, February 8, 1920)
It seems to me that it is principally with Mr.
Neufville we have to do; and tho' I believe him to be as much a Jew as any in
Jerusalem, I did not expect that with so many and such constant Professions of
Friendship for the United States with which he loads all his Letters, he would
have attempted to enforce his Demands (which I doubt not will be extravagant
enough) by a Proceeding so abominable." (The Writings of Benjamin Franklin, Vol. 8, The MacMillian Co., p.
332).
"The Gulag Archipelago, 'he informed an incredulous world that the
blood-maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million victims in
Russia from 1918 to 1957! Solzhenitsyn cited Cheka Order No. 10, issued on
January 8, 1921: 'To intensify the repression of the bourgeoisie.'" (Alexander
Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago)
"The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age." (Napoleon
Bonaparte)
"A Jew is anyone who says he is." (David
Ben Gurion)
"They are the carrion birds of humanity...[speaking of the Jews]
are a state within a state. They are certainly not real citizens...The evils of
Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of these
people." (Napoleon Bonaparte, Stated in Reflections
and Speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806)
"The Jew continues to monopolize money, and he loosens or strangles
the throat of the state with the loosening or strengthening of his purse
strings...He has empowered himself with the engines of the press, which he uses
to batter at the foundations of society. He is at the bottom of...every
enterprise that will demolish first of all thrones, afterwards the altar,
afterwards civil law." (Hungarian composer Franz Liszt
(1811-1886) in Die Israeliten.)
"The Jews are the most hateful and the most shameful of the small
nations." (Voltaire, God and His Men)
"There had been observed in this country certain streams of
influence which are causing a marked deterioration in our literature,
amusements, and social conduct...a nasty Orientalism which had insidiously
affected every channel of expression...The fact that these influences are all
traceable to one racial source [Judaism] is something to be reckoned with...Our
opposition is only in ideas, false ideas, which are sapping the moral stamina
of the people."
(My Life and Work, by Henry Ford)
"You've seen every single race besmirched, but you never saw an
unfavorable image of a kike because the Jews are ever watchful for that. They
never allowed it to be shown on the screen!" (Marlon
Brando, Playboy, Jan. 1979)
"It is rather surprising is it not? That whichever
way you turn to trace the harmful streams of influence that flow through
society, you come upon a group of Jews. In sports corruption, a group of Jews.
In exploiting finance, a group of Jews. In theatrical degeneracy, a group of
Jews. In liquor propaganda, a group of Jews. Absolutely dominating the wireless
communications of the world, a group of Jews. The menace of the movies, a group
of Jews. In control of the press through business and financial pressure, a
group of Jews. War profiteers, 80 percent of them, Jews. The mezmia of
so-called popular music, which combines weak mindedness, with every suggestion
of lewdness, Jews. Organizations of anti-Christian laws and customs, again
Jews. It is time to show that the cry of bigot is raised mostly by bigots. There
is a religious prejudice in this country; there is, indeed, a religious
persecution, there is a forcible shoving aside of the religious liberties of
the majority of the people. And this prejudice and persecution and use of
force, is Jewish and nothing but Jewish.
If it is anti-Semitism to say that Communism in the
United States is Jewish, so be it. But to the unprejudiced mind it will look
very much like Americanism. Communism all over the world and not only in Russia
is Jewish." (International Jew, by Henry Ford,
1922)
"The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here,
but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with
the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the
people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing
to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we
have, for the benefit of this weak and newly developed place and land in
general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying
also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves as also for the general
community of your worships, that the deceitful race, such hateful enemies and
blasphemers of the name of Christ, be not allowed further to infect and trouble
this new colony, to the detraction of your worships and dissatisfaction of your
worships' most affectionate subjects." (Peter
Stuyvesant, in a letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India
Company, from New Amsterdam (New York), September 22, 1654).
"They {the Jews} work more effectively against us, than the enemy's
armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great
cause we are engaged in...It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago,
has not hunted them down as pests to society and the greatest enemies we have
to the happiness of America." (George Washington, in Maxims of
George Washington by A.A. Appleton & Co.)
"The Jews form a state, and, obeying their own laws, they evade
those of their host country. the Jews always considered an oath regarding a
Christian not binding. During the Campaign of 1812 the Jews were spies, they
were paid by both sides, they betrayed both sides. It is seldom that the police
investigate a robbery in which a Jew is not found either to be an accomplice or
a receiver." (Count Helmuth von Molthke, Prussian
General)
"The Jews are a class violating every regulation of trade
established by the Treasury Department, and also department orders and are
herein expelled from the department within 24 hours from receipt of this
order." (President Ulysses S. Grant)
Sunday, March 24, 2019
Friday, March 22, 2019
Wednesday, March 20, 2019
The Importance of Leadership
Source: Free Speech magazine, July 2002, Volume VIII, Number VII
by Dr. William L. Pierce
Every
time I fly somewhere for a meeting or a speaking engagement, I have to
spend an hour or two in airports. That’s a very democratic experience. One
really sees the dregs of humanity in airports these days. It used to be that
what bothered me most was seeing young White women with mongrel offspring in
tow. What irritates me at least as much these days is the sight of young White
males trying to look and act like Blacks. In every airport one sees these sorry
specimens wearing hip-hop garb: backward baseball caps, baggy shorts or
trousers, and clueless expressions on their faces. More and more one sees these
slack-jawed cretins with their hair done in cornrows and pieces of metal
through their lips or cheeks or nostrils.
I mentioned in a recent broadcast
that I saw young Whites like this shuffling along the sidewalks of Philadelphia
during one of my rare visits to that urban pesthole last month. The more White
males I see garbed and groomed like Blacks, the less surprised I am to see
White females leading by the hand the disgusting proof that they have been
dabbling in bestiality. It’s obvious that this sort of degeneracy is rapidly
becoming much more widespread. When I did an interview with Rolling Stone
magazine nearly two years ago, they sent along a German photographer who had
his blond hair done in dreadlocks. I don’t know why I should expect more of
Germans than that. After all, they have had 57 years – two generations – of
Judaeo-American forced education in democracy now. Turn on any TV receiver in
Germany, and you will see much of the same poisonous, race-destroying filth
from Hollywood that you see here. Young Germans watch Sumner Redstone’s MTV
just about as much as young Americans do. And in Germany as in America: monkey
see, monkey do.
Last year the first-place
photojournalism award for the best photograph by a newspaper photographer went
to Mike Urban of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, for a photograph he
took during the Mardi Gras riot there. I talked about that riot on this program
last year. Gangs of Blacks ran through the mostly White crowd of Mardi Gras
revelers, snatching purses, punching White women in the face, throwing them to
the ground, and kicking them senseless, while Seattle’s cops stood on the
sidelines and refused to interfere, lest they be accused of “racial profiling.”
One young White man who tried to help a young White woman who had been knocked
down and was being kicked by Blacks, was smashed in the head by a Black
wielding a bottle and was killed. I repeatedly watched the newsreel footage of
the riot, and it clearly was a Black-on-White riot.
But not entirely. There were some
Whites among the rioters: “wiggers” I call them. That means “White niggers.”
They’re the ones with the backward baseball caps. Mike Urban’s prize-winning
photograph, which the Seattle Post-Intelligencer did not have the
courage to publish, is of a young White woman in the crowd who has been
stripped naked by a gang of men and is being pawed and sexually abused by some
of them while others constrain her. Most of the 20 or so men holding the naked
girl down and pawing her are non-Whites: mestizos or Blacks. But in the
photograph one can see clearly three or four White males – wiggers – grinning
as they help the Blacks hold the struggling girl: a shocking and sickening
portrait of the reality of multiculturalism.
What should be done with wiggers? In
my view they are a thousand times worse than Blacks, and when the time of
cleansing for America comes, they certainly will be dealt with first.
And there’s another class of White
people we can do without. They don’t wear hip-hop clothes or have their hair
done in cornrows. On the socioeconomic ladder they’re a rung or two above
wiggers, but they’re at least as bad as wiggers. They are the Whites who
collaborate with the Jews. With the exception of the German photographer for Rolling
Stone, who was a wigger, virtually all the other journalists with whom
I’ve dealt are in the collaborator class. They don’t help rioting Blacks tear
the clothes off White girls and sexually abuse them, but they help the Jews
generate the social climate in which that sort of thing can happen. They help
the Jews disseminate their multicultural propaganda. They help the Jews teach
young Whites that they shouldn’t resist Blacks, that it’s all right to mix with
them. They help the Jews indoctrinate politicians and police officials with
Political Correctness, so that White cops are less likely to intervene to
protect Whites from Blacks. Sumner Redstone could not spread his poisonous,
racially destructive, hip-hop filth through his MTV channel without the active
collaboration of thousands of White helpers.
And its not just the Whites who help
Redstone by buying advertising on MTV or working for him as announcers or
scriptwriters who are collaborators. Here’s an example: a month ago a small,
nearly all-White South Dakota college town was turned upside down when it was
discovered that a Black basketball player, whom the local college recently had imported
from Chicago, was infected with HIV and was having sex with the White girls at
the college: with lots of them. Nearly everybody at the college had to have an
HIV test, and it turned out that several of the girls there already had become
infected by the Black. It’s likely that a few of the White boys will be testing
positive for HIV pretty soon.
The only reason this story made the
news is that the Black basketball player knew he was infected and was having
sex with White girls without telling them of his infection. He had found out he
was infected after a routine blood test, but he kept the news to himself so as
not to interfere with his sex life. Well, there’s a law against that sort of
thing in South Dakota, and so now the Black is locked up and out of
circulation. To me the shocking thing is not that the Black was deliberately
infecting his sex partners; the shocking thing is that White college girls were
willing to have sex with him, and that White college boys were willing to
tolerate that sort of behavior and to have sex themselves with girls they knew
had been having sex with a Black. So far as I am concerned, every White woman
who has sex with any Black deserves to be infected with HIV and to die a
horrible death from AIDS.
But the really reprehensible people
in this story are the White college officials who imported this Black
basketball player from Chicago. I imagine that before they found out that he
was spreading HIV through the whole student body they were quite proud of themselves
for having brought some “diversity” to this White college. I have a pretty
strong suspicion that these academic idiots wouldn’t have been bothered a bit
about White girls having sex with the Black if it hadn’t been for the HIV. They
would be proud that they had taught the girls to be so “tolerant.” They would
be happy that the White girls aren’t “racists.”
These South Dakota college officials
almost certainly aren’t Jews, but they are doing the Jews’ work for them.
Sumner Redstone and the other media Jews have been working for decades to
create the moral and ideological climate where this sort of thing could happen –
they have been making racial mixing fashionable – but without the active
collaboration of White college officials and White journalists and White
politicians and White Christian preachers, all of the Jews’ racially
destructive efforts would have been in vain.
I’m sure that everyone listening is
familiar with situations similar to that at the South Dakota college, but
without the HIV. There are Christians in small communities all across the
Whiter areas of America who feel guilty that their communities are so White,
and many of these guilt-stricken Christians have tried to remedy the situation
by importing Blacks or other non-Whites into their churches or their
communities. Some of them even bring in the Blacks from as far away as Africa.
And again, the Jewish media people have been the biggest factor in generating
the moral and ideological climate in which being White is something to feel guilty
about, but it is local Gentile preachers and teachers and politicians and
journalists who actually do the destructive work of making their communities
more racially “diverse.”
So what’s to be done with all of
these collaborators if we want one day to have a clean America again?
The reason we’re discussing this
subject today is that there is a difference of opinion among members in my own
organization, the National Alliance, about what attitude we should have toward
wiggers and collaborators. Some members believe that we should take the hardest
possible line toward them. Whether they are wiggers or White women who consort
with Blacks or White journalists who follow the Jewish party line or White
politicians who do the Jews’ bidding in order to get themselves elected or any
other sort of collaborator, they should all be put up against a wall and given
traitors’ justice.
And some members of the National
Alliance believe that we should be more understanding of the conditions, of the
environment, that made these wiggers and collaborators opt for treason.
Now, all of this is pretty academic
at this time, since we’re still a long way from being able to punish anybody
for anything. About all we can do now is try to understand what is happening in
the world around us and communicate with others, help others understand. But I
should tell you that until a few years ago I was pretty much in agreement with
the hard liners. I was in favor of getting rid of all of the wiggers and all of
the collaborators as a first step toward building a healthy society for our
people.
But my views on this have changed as
I have learned more about human motivation and human behavior. What I have come
to understand about people – our people, White people – is that there are very
few, probably only a fraction of a per cent, who are consciously evil: a
fraction of a per cent who collaborate with the Jews knowing that they are
helping the Jews destroy our people but who do it anyway for reasons of
personal gain. These collaborators fit the clinical definition of psychopath:
people without conscience. I believe that most politicians are in this
category.
And there are only a small minority
of our people who have an innate moral sense, a minority of two or three or
four per cent of the White population who are able to think independently and
form their own views about what is good and what is evil, what is right and
what is wrong.
And the remaining 95 per cent or so
of the population simply don’t have minds or consciences of their own. They may
be bright or they may be dull, they may have good work habits or they may be
lazy and careless, they may be well disciplined and have good character or they
may be weak and self-indulgent slobs, but all of them conform their opinions
about what is right and what is wrong, about what is proper behavior and what
is unacceptable, to their perception of the opinions and behavior of their
peers.
No matter how foolish we may think
their opinions, no matter how perverse we may consider their behavior, they have
no innate compass for judging these things; they can only conform their
thinking and their behavior to the thinking and behavior they perceive in their
peers. Sometimes – that is, at most times in the past, prior to the last
century – what they perceived was real. They observed and listened to their
neighbors at first hand. And especially they observed and listened to community
leaders, to role models, to authority figures, including especially parents. So
what we had in the past among this 95 per cent of our people were patterns of
thinking and behavior that varied primarily with social class. But the patterns
were based on perceptions of real behavior among peers.
Since the rise of the mass media
during the past century, however – and especially since the rise of television
during the past half-century – what has been perceived has been increasingly
artificial. What has been perceived has to a large degree not been the thinking
and behavior of their flesh-and-blood peers that have evolved naturally over
the course of generations, but rather the artificially contrived behavior and
pretended thinking of actors and actresses and commentators on movie screens
and TV screens and of models in magazine advertising. Scriptwriters and film
directors and spin doctors and advertising executives have to a very large
degree taken the place of parents and of other natural role models in shaping
the thinking and behavior of the masses. And of course, perception gradually
becomes reality. Eventually we observe among our peers behavior that is very
similar to that we see on our television screens. But the mass media –
especially the mass media of entertainment – continue to lead and to move and
to shape public thinking and public behavior.
That is a fact with profound implications.
I’ll recapitulate: Most people – probably 95 per cent of the population – are
neither good nor evil. They are morally neutral. Their attitudes and opinions
and aspirations – their moral judgments and their behavior – are determined not
by any innate sense of right and wrong but rather are conformed to the
attitudes and behavior they perceive in their peers, real or artificial, and
especially to the attitudes and behavior they perceive in role models and
authority figures. When those role models and authority figures incorporate and
display what is best in a people, then the attitudes and behavior of the masses
will be good and progressive and characteristic of the best tendencies in the
race. If the leaders and role models display noble qualities and greatness,
then the masses will strive toward nobility and greatness. They won’t all get
there, of course, but they will strive for those qualities, and many will
achieve them.
If their leaders show their racial
consciousness and pride and their respect for the best traditions of their
people, then the masses also will be racially conscious and will try to behave
in a way that displays racial pride and respect for tradition. They will not
even consider mixing with non-Whites or imitating their ways, and they will not
tolerate such behavior in their peers. The concept of racial treason will be
abhorrent to them.
But if their role models and
authority figures display the worst and weakest traits in the people, then that
behavior will be reflected in the behavior of the masses. And if their role
models and authority figures are mere puppets controlled by aliens whose aim is
the demoralization and destruction of the people, then the masses will behave
in the way we can see them behaving on the streets of Philadelphia or in our
airport terminals today. That is the consequence of permitting the Jews to gain
a dominant influence over our mass media of news and entertainment.
And so what is the point in shooting
wiggers or collaborators, except as an educational measure, to provide an
example of behavior that will not be tolerated in a healthy society? Or
perhaps, in the case of wiggers, we might consider shooting the most
slack-jawed among them as a eugenic measure.
The point is that what we need to aim
for is not eliminating the great mass of people who have bad behavior or bad
attitudes, but rather changing their role models and authority figures. We
should not even think about getting rid of the lemmings, just because they have
been behaving badly. They make up the great majority of every society, and it
is necessary that they do so. They provide the stability and cohesiveness
necessary for a viable society. A society cannot tolerate too many independent
thinkers, just as it cannot tolerate too many psychopaths.
Think about these things. I know
that it took me a lot of thinking and a lot of observing to become quite sure
that what I have just told you is, in fact, correct. Twenty years ago, I
believed that people are born with all of the fundamental traits that they will
display as adults. And at one level – a very basic level – that is true.
Intelligence – various types of intelligence – is a group of fundamental traits
that individuals are born with. And there certainly are inherited tendencies
toward certain types of behavior as well. But these are underlying tendencies,
and the ways in which these underlying tendencies are expressed in individuals –
the ways in which they manifest themselves as the individuals mature – are very
much subject to external influences.
The 15-year-old, slack-jawed White
boy encountered on a Philadelphia sidewalk who wears a backward baseball cap
and baggy trousers and collects basketball cards with pictures of Black players
could have turned out to be a decent White teenager instead, with pride of race
and aspirations to be a policeman or a soldier or a craftsman: perhaps not a
brilliant member of White society, but at least a constructive member. The
20-year-old White woman encountered in an airport terminal with needle marks on
her arms and three mulatto offspring trailing behind her could have turned out
to be that White policeman or soldier or craftsman’s wife, living a clean life
and proudly bearing and caring for his children.
For the masses, everything depends
on the examples that are set for them, on their role models and authority
figures. Monkey see; monkey do.
That is why it does not behoove us
to think of ourselves at war against wiggers and collaborators. When I see a
White kid wearing hip-hop clothing, I still feel a strong urge to kick. And
when I see a White woman with mongrel offspring, I wish that I could call in an
air strike against New York or Washington or Philadelphia or Los Angeles; I
really have an urge to lay waste to the whole society that tolerates such
abominations.
But I understand that our task is
not to kick and shoot and bomb; instead it is to communicate and to teach. We
don’t need to try to communicate with the wiggers and the collaborators now.
But we do need to communicate with those of our people capable of being
positive role models and authority figures, and we do need to continue to build
our means – our media – for reaching ever larger numbers of ordinary White
people: those who have not yet been completely corrupted by the aliens who have
subverted our mass media into a weapon for waging genocide against our people.
When the time comes there will be
enough punishment for those who need it. But what most of our people, who are
behaving badly now, need is not punishment but good leadership, good examples.
And that is what we must strive to give them.
* * *
Sunday, March 17, 2019
Pete McCloskey “The machinations of the ADL”
By Paul N. Mccloskey
Published: 2019-03-12
Former
Congressman Pete McCloskey speaks at the 13th Institute for Historical Review
conference in the year 2000. His topic of speech is Israel, the Anti-Defamation
League and Free Speech.
Thursday, March 14, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)