by Dr. William Pierce
One of the most profoundly depressing experiences an
American can subject himself to these days is watching the various presidential
candidates campaigning on his television screen. My god, what a sorry
spectacle! Bush and McCain, Gore and Bradley: these are the „leaders“ approved
for us by the media masters. These are the men they have said it’s OK for us to
vote for, the ones they have checked out and decided are safe. And every one of
these approved candidates is a man who would be marched straight to the gallows
and hanged on the first day of any general cleanup of America: every one of
them. There is not an honest man or a patriot among them, not one who will
stand up to the media bosses or even wants to stand up to them.
In Austria, where one politician
who has not been approved by the media bosses somehow slipped through a crack
and ended up with enough votes to gain substantial influence in the Austrian
government, the Jews are organizing huge demonstrations of immigrants,
communists, feminists, homosexuals, democrats, and the usual rabble. Freedom
Party leader Jörg Haider has groveled and apologized to the Jews for saying
some Politically Incorrect things in the past, but that’s not enough for them.
He wasn’t approved, he wasn’t certified kosher, and they want him out.
In America, on the other hand,
all of the major-party candidates have been approved. What a depressing
thought! Think how much better off the Austrians are than we are! Well, really,
that’s not much better, because Haider is nothing but a conservative. He may
slow Austria’s decline for a while, but he certainly won’t clean his country
up. Over here we have an approved conservative, a kosher conservative, in the
person of George W. Bush, Jr., and three approved liberals, in the persons of
John McCain, Al Gore, and Bill Bradley. What a choice!
To me the most depressing
aspect of this situation is the way in which the American people have adapted
to it. Now, it’s true that in the last presidential election, in 1996, a majority
– 51 per cent – of the eligible voters voted, in effect, for „none of the
above,“ by choosing not to vote. I suppose that I ought to consider that a good
sign, but, really, when the choice was between Bill Clinton and Viagra poster
boy Bob Dole, who throughout his political life was a disgustingly subservient
flunky of the Jews, like John McCain is today, you can hardly blame people for
not bothering to go to the polls. What I’m afraid of is that the percentage of
the electorate voting this year will bounce back up from its low point of 49
per cent in 1996. In other words, most Americans – or at least, more than half
of them – still take the charade seriously. That’s a shame, but not really
surprising.
I always take what I see on
the television screen with a grain of salt, but despite the spin applied to the
news by the media bosses, there’s usually some truth in what they show us. When
they show us a sampling of public opinion, a series of little sidewalk
interviews, they certainly are able to slant the impression they give us of
public opinion by choosing in the editing room which interviews to keep and
which to discard, but for the most part the people we see being interviewed
after the editing is done are real people. Unlike the anchor person or the interviewer,
they aren’t paid actors. And so we must believe that there really are such
idiots in our population: a lot of such idiots, in fact.
I’m using the word „idiot“
loosely here, of course. Most interviewees aren’t really stupid; they’re just
lemmings. They say what they believe is expected of them, what they believe
other people would say in their place. Which is why these sidewalk interviews
are such a useful tool for the media bosses. The lemmings who are watching the
interviews on their screens take their cue from the lemmings who are being
interviewed, and so any spin put on these interviews has a real effect on
public opinion.
That doesn’t really provide a
complete explanation of the disaster that has befallen us, however.
Lemminghood, I believe, is a hereditary condition. That is, one is either born
a lemming or not, and not much can be done to change the condition after birth.
But there are other elements of our society who aren’t lemmings, but who
nevertheless have contributed to the disaster. I was talking with a
secret-police agent last week, a man I’ve spoken with on several occasions in
the past. He’s retiring now, after 32 years with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, and so he shouldn’t be under an obligation any longer to avoid
saying anything Politically Incorrect. He’s an intelligent man and not unlike
many others in his line of work, I believe. I asked him again last week a
question I’ve asked him on several previous occasions: How can he justify
working for Bill Clinton? Doesn’t he at least have some misgivings working for
a government headed by Bill Clinton?
Well, I got the same answer I’ve
gotten from him before. He’s not working for Bill Clinton, he told me, or for
Janet Reno. He’s working to uphold the Constitution, he said. He believes in
the system we have, he told me. He believes the system still works. And he said
that with a straight face, as if he really believed it. And I think that in
some sense, at some level, he does believe it. I don’t think he’s like the
lemming, who foolishly and enthusiastically jumps aboard every trend that comes
along. He simply avoids coming to inconvenient or uncomfortable conclusions.
And there’s probably a bit of authoritarianism mixed in there, as is the case
with many career cops and military people: a tendency to assume that might is
right.
I think that we see the same
sort of mentality at work when military officers support Clinton administration
policies on homosexuals and on women in combat. In the past they were
unanimously opposed to these policies. But then the Jews demanded that
homosexuals be accepted in the military and that women be permitted to be on
submarine crews, and the political appointees in the Pentagon scrambled to
issue new regulations in line with these demands, and the career military
people begin readjusting their thinking to bring it into line. I think that
they really justify to themselves their changed views on these matters. Not one
in a hundred will do the honorable thing and resign in protest. Instead, they will
conform their opinions to whatever is demanded of them – just as the secret
policeman I occasionally speak with, and his Constitution-supporting
colleagues, will without hesitation violate every Constitutional right I have
if orders come down from Washington to arrest me as an „enemy of democracy,“ or
whatever.
You know, it’s not too
difficult for us to figure out what has happened to us in retrospect. It’s not
too difficult for us to understand the mechanics of the way in which the people
who control the mass media are able to determine public policy by playing on
the psychologies of the susceptible elements of the population. What is eerie
to me is the way in which the Jews instinctively went for control of the media
at a time when no one had the advantage of hindsight. How did they know, in the
first quarter of the last century, when motion pictures were in their infancy
and television was only a dream in the minds of a few visionary engineers, such
as Philo Farnsworth, that the key to the control of the world lay in Hollywood?
When I think about it, I’m
inclined to believe that it was part instinct and part luck. Jews always have
had a mercantile instinct. It’s evolved with them in the course of thousands of
years during which trade was their principal activity. And a good line of
patter, the ability to get the rubes to line up and buy a ticket to the
sideshow, is certainly an asset to the man who wants you to buy something from
him. In other words, showmanship and salesmanship are compatible traits, and so
the Jews may have been attracted to Hollywood – and to other media – primarily
as a result of their mercantile tendencies, without a long-range plan for using
the media to acquire complete domination of our society. Maybe. But it didn’t
take them very long to see that potential and then to take advantage of it.
As useful as it may be for us
to understand how they managed to get the sack over our heads, the more urgent
question now is: what are we going to do about it? How are we going to get the sack
off? It’s an urgent question, because our time is running out. The Jews are
using their present advantage over us in an attempt to make it impossible for
us to recover. They’re keeping our borders open, flooding America with every
sort of wretched refuse from the Third World they can coax into the country.
They’re pushing miscegenation with all of their media as hard as they can,
trying to convince our oh-so-desperate-to-be-fashionable young women that
bedding down with a Black or some other non-White is the most fashionable thing
they can do – and unfortunately, they’re having a lot of success with this
race-wrecking program. And they’re absolutely determined to repeal the First
and Second Amendments to our Constitution, so that I can’t warn you about what’s
coming, and you can’t defend yourself when it gets here.
Now, I receive many
suggestions from listeners as to what we should do about all of this. Some
people tell me that we need to buy a television network – and I agree with
that, but so far no one with this suggestion has sent me a check for $20
billion to make such a purchase possible. Other listeners have told me that we
need to run candidates for public office and take the country back by winning
the public offices now being held by the treasonous politicians of the
Democratic and Republican Parties.
Actually, I believe that it’s
quite reasonable to run candidates for public office, to use the democratic
process – and any other process we can use for our purpose – so long as we go
about it realistically. That is, we mustn’t fool ourselves into believing that
we’re actually going to succeed in taking back the country that way. The
problem is that as long as most of the public consists of lemmings and
television remains in the hands of the Jews, the public will vote for an
approved candidate, a candidate who has secretly pledged his loyalty to the
enemies of our people and who has been certified kosher. But election campaigns
do provide a forum, they provide another means of communicating with the
public. And they may be the best means for communicating with the most
conventional and conservative sector of the public, with those who are
authoritarians but not really lemmings, and who believe that everything must be
done in accord with the system.
But we really don’t have much
time for trying things that may be useful in one way or another but that
ultimately won’t get the job done. We must do what we can do effectively – and
which ultimately will be successful. So let me spell it out for you: America
will not be taken back by people who believe Bill Clinton is an OK guy. It will
not be taken back by people who believe that Bill Bradley or John McCain or
George Bush or any other TV-approved politician ought to be in the White House
instead of Bill Clinton. America will not be taken back by the lemmings. As
long as those who are determined to destroy our race are able to control the
thinking and behavior of the majority of voters, we must not waste our time and
our resources on majority-based schemes. The masses of our people can have a
part in taking back America only after the grip of our enemies on their minds
has been broken. Until then we must look to the minority of our people able to
think for themselves. We must have a plan based on elites, not on the masses.
Many of our people who think
of themselves as patriots feel that we have been betrayed by our elites – and
in a sense we have. After the Second World War, when the Jews began pushing
their various programs to multiculturalize America – that is, to break the
power of the White majority – these programs impacted most heavily on the
Whites at the bottom of the socioeconomic scale. The White professional and
business classes, the Whites with more money and mobility, were better able to
protect themselves. When government programs began destroying White
neighborhoods and White schools, they could move to safer neighborhoods; they
could send their children to private schools. Affirmative action was no threat
to them, because Blacks couldn’t handle the sort of work they did. The real
traitors – the Kennedys and their ilk – lived in private compounds with armed
guards and felt that they would be able to live well and be safe no matter what
happened to everyone else.
And today we still have a high
concentration of traitors among the wealthiest Whites. We have the disgusting
spectacle of the richest White man in the world trying to buy favor with the
Jews and the non-Whites by giving hundreds of millions of dollars to vaccinate
Blacks in Africa and pay tuition for Blacks in America. But really, we have few
White heroes in any class. The disgusting behavior of Bill Gates is more than
matched by the disgusting behavior of the White workers who cheer for Black
basketball players and let their daughters run with sub-humans, and by the
mindless adoption by White yuppies of every Jew-promoted fashion, no matter how
degenerate. And anyway, when I speak of White elites I am not thinking
primarily of rich Whites. I am thinking of Whites able to think for themselves,
regardless of income. Being rich doesn’t automatically bestow the ability to
think independently, but being able to think independently does give a person
certain advantages in the struggle for survival.
And we should note that the
struggle for survival has changed during the past 50 years. The lemmings
believe that they are better off than before, because they can buy more shiny
gadgets at the mall than they could 50 years ago. To them, this makes up for
the prospect of mulatto grandchildren. But many thinking Whites in the
professional class are beginning to understand that there are limits to what
their money and mobility can get them in a society controlled by Jews. The
flood of immigrants from Asia already has impacted on their career prospects
the way affirmative action impacted on blue collar Whites a generation ago.
Medical schools and graduate schools in America are packed with non-Whites from
India and Pakistan and China and Korea and a dozen other countries. These
Asians are just as alien as Blacks are, but they are vastly more able. They are
able to compete with educated Whites for positions in the professions the way
Blacks began competing for factory jobs and service-industry jobs with
working-class Whites in the 1960s and 1970s.
What has happened in America
in just the last decade has made a big difference for many White professionals,
though certainly not for all. Many White professionals – and would-be
professionals, who now are obliged to settle for blue collar work, because there’s
no room for them in graduate school or medical school or other professional
schools – really have been hit hard. Many are confused by the change. Most
haven’t figured it out yet, but they are more open to the truth now than they
have been at any time in the past. That’s why my organization, the National
Alliance, is more successful now in recruiting young university faculty
members, young engineers, young physicians, young pharmacists, young
biochemists, young computer scientists, even young lawyers, than ever before,
despite the fact that the economy is keeping most people comfortable.
And, as I indicated a moment
ago, it’s not just the professionals to whom we must address ourselves. It is
the elite minority of our people able to think for themselves, regardless of
what they do for a living. The lemmings may not be bothered by the prospect of
mulatto grandchildren, and perhaps Bill Gates isn’t either, but among the
thinking minority plenty of White people are bothered by that prospect.
We have two factors at work
here. We have the material factor. We have the realization that life-style and
security, that career opportunities, have been damaged by the
multiculturalization of America, and that has made some of our
independent-minded people receptive to the truth, who a decade ago would have
preferred not to think about it. And we have the aesthetic factor, the
spiritual factor. We have the realization that life has lost much of its
meaning, much of its value, in a darkening world, regardless of material
considerations. This realization has opened the minds of many people in the
arts. The fact that resistance music is booming as never before is just one
consequence of this.
Now, thinking people never
will be able to outvote the lemmings. And a howling mob of the dispossessed
outside the city gates, acting alone, never will take a strong citadel, but
with allies inside to open the gates, the prospects for taking the citadel
improve dramatically. We live today in a technocratic society. Money and the media
and politics may seem all-powerful at first glance, but all of these elements
of power are completely dependent on a technocratic elite, an elite that
understands the mechanism that keeps the wheels turning and that has its hands
on the levers that control the machine.
Furthermore, the mediacrats
depend not only on the engineers and programmers who keep their machinery of
illusion running, but also on a creative and artistic minority who create their
illusions for them, and not all of these toilers in the illusion factory are
Jews.
And so while our television
screens are filled with images of the media-approved politicians strutting and
smiling and kissing Black babies, we’ll continue helping the independent-minded
portion of the population understand what’s happening. We’ll continue building
an organization based on that elite minority of the White population. And we’ll
continue building our media capabilities, our ability for communicating with
everyone in the White population willing to listen. I’d be happy to have you
join us in this effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment