The official blog of the site “Der Stürmer” – http://der-stuermer.org
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
Saturday, June 27, 2020
Adolf Hitler About the Propaganda
The cleaning
of our public life of manifestations of decay leads to a reform of our press,
of film and of theater life.
Speech of
January 30, 1934 in Berlin
It is no
pleasure to read fifteen newspapers, which all have almost the same content:
over the course of time our editors must again be so schooled that they can add
their own valuable contributions to the national construction. But I can assure
you of one thing: I will tolerate no press, whose purpose is to destroy what we
have started to build up.
Interview of
April 3, 1934 in Berlin
If it is the
attitude of an editor to put his own interesting world-view in opposition to
ours, he should be told that I will then use the modern possibilities of the
press likewise to combat him. I will give no chance whatever to the agents of
foreign powers; such agents violate their right as guest. I welcome a foreign
correspondent who reports objectively and without bias what he sees and hears
in Germany. But every correspondent - for the sake of himself as well as of his
reputation as journalist - should not expose himself to the risk of having to
later contradict himself.
Interview of
April 3, 1934 in Berlin
While I on
the one hand wish criticism, I on the other hand insist that those who work for
the well-being of the whole folk must have the security of being able to pursue
their work in peace.
Interview of
April 3, 1934 in Berlin
A press,
which is fundamentally anti-national, cannot be tolerated in Germany. Whoever
denies the nation, has no business in it. We must demand that the press becomes
the instrument of the national self-education.
Speech of
April 27, 1923 in Munich
The name
“Völkischer Beobachter” [“Folkish Observer”] has become a program for itself.
Made war upon and attacked by a whole world of enemies, countless times
persecuted and banned, our central organ has conveyed to tens of thousands and
again tens of thousands of fighters the spiritual basics and fundaments, which
make up the essence of our present National Socialist view. Distributed across
the entire German-speaking area of Europe, our “Völkischer Beobachter” has
helped everywhere to create cells for the German liberation struggle, but
conveyed to existing groups that knowledge, which is indispensable for the
unity of the thought and of the action of our movement.
From the
Central Publishing House of the NSDAP: Eher, Munich, distributed for
advertising purpose
Wednesday, June 24, 2020
David Duke & Mark Collett: The Racist War Against White People
Dr. David Duke Radio Show
(19-Jun-2020)
Dr. Duke and Mark Collett had a discussion on
the acceleration of the attack on white people world-wide by the Jewish elite
using blacks and immigrants as a front.
Monday, June 22, 2020
Saturday, June 20, 2020
Fashion for Genocide
by Dr. William L. Pierce
American
Dissident Voices broadcast, September 26th 1998
A month ago, I told you about the murder of two
White girls, Tracy Lambert and Susan Moore, in Fayetteville, North Carolina, as
part of the initiation of new members into the Black and Hispanic Crips gang.
I’m still receiving comments about that program. Apparently many listeners –
especially those with Internet access – checked out the facts as reported in
the Fayetteville newspaper, and they were shocked that, just as I said, there
was no media coverage of these terrible murders outside the Fayetteville area.
They were shocked that virtually all of the mainstream media around the country
would deliberately hide the news of these racially motivated murders from the
White public – and these were the same media which had made such a sensation
about the killing of a convicted Black drug dealer and his girlfriend in
Fayetteville by a White soldier, James Burmeister, in December 1995.
But really, no one who has been
listening to my broadcasts should have been shocked. I have commented over and
over again about the virtual control of all of America’s mass media by the
Jews, and I have pointed out many times that the Jews’ policy is to disarm the
White population morally as well as physically by deliberately creating the
false impression that Whites are oppressors and victimizers, and non-Whites are
our innocent victims. They want us to feel guilty. They want us to feel that it
would be immoral for us to resist any of their schemes for more non-White
immigration, for more so-called “diversity” and “multiculturalism,” for more
racial mixing and racial intermarriage.
That is what the Jewish media bosses
are deliberately pushing: the destruction of our people through racial mixing,
and they don’t want us to put up any resistance. And I am sorry to say, their
program is succeeding. When they send their step’n’fetchit Bill Clinton around
the country making speeches about how much he is looking forward to an America
with a non-White majority, about how any resistance to the government’s
programs for the darkening of America would be un-American, he is applauded by
brainwashed young Whites who have been deceived by this deliberately falsified
media impression of Whites as oppressors.
Now you know, I am making a pretty
serious accusation. I am accusing the Jewish population as a whole – and the
Jewish media bosses in particular – of planning our annihilation as a race, of
planning to commit genocide against us. And I don’t want anyone to think that I
am basing my accusation on only the few instances of racially motivated killings
I already have cited: their suppression of the news of the Fayetteville murders
of two White girls by the Crips and their sensationalizing of the news of the
Fayetteville shooting of a Black drug dealer and his girlfriend by a White
soldier and of the dragging death of another convicted Black criminal in Texas
by three Whites. And so today I’ll talk a bit more about anti-White crimes
which the Jewish media have deliberately covered up. The details aren’t
pleasant – in fact, they are shocking – but I believe that many listeners need
to be shocked.
Let’s begin with another crime which
occurred in Fayetteville. This is timely because the trial of the criminals
began just last week. Here’s what happened: Donald Lange, a 25-year-old White
soldier at Fort Bragg was leaving an International House of Pancakes in
Fayetteville. He accidentally bumped into a group of seven Black soldiers who
were going in. The Blacks began punching Lange while shouting racial insults at
him. They dragged him into the adjacent parking lot and stomped and kicked him
while continuing to shout racial epithets.
A witness in the trial of the
Blacks, Tracye Cochran, was in the parking lot where the assault took place.
She told the court last week, “The Black person who threw the first punch was
the one who knocked him down... It dropped him down to his knees. He got back
up and got hit again... I was walking toward the fight screaming and hollering
for them to leave him alone... By then he was just getting hit by people left
and right.” Another witness, Gina Perez, testified that she saw eight or ten
Blacks kicking and stomping Lange as he lay on the pavement. She told of seeing
one Black kicking Lange in the face, causing his head to slam into the pavement
and bounce back. The Black would then kick him again, over and over. Perez
said, “They just kicked him to death. I remember him being on his side, being
kicked over and over again.”
Actually they didn’t quite kick
Lange to death. They just destroyed his brain. He has neither moved nor spoken
since the beating. His brain was so badly damaged that doctors say that he will
never again be more than a vegetable.
Now, if you live outside the
Fayetteville area, I’ll wager that you’ve heard not a word about what happened
to Donald Lange before this broadcast. Imagine what you would have heard if
Donald had been Black and the soldiers who destroyed his life had been White.
The networks would have shown Mr. Clinton denouncing the attack on television
and calling for new laws against “hate crime.” In fact, that’s exactly what
they had Clinton doing last year when a White teen-ager beat up a Black
teen-ager who had come into his White Chicago neighborhood. Clinton referred to
the incident in his weekly radio address and used it as an example of why we must
do something about “race hate.” But Mr. Clinton has responded to the stomping
of Donald Lange with silence.
If Donald Lange had been Black and
his attackers White, the media bosses would have had Janet Reno on television
announcing that she was sending in the FBI. The media would have been
interviewing every professional hate merchant: the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the
Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, Morris Dees and his Southern Poverty
Law Center, and all the rest. The media would have made a real circus of it,
and the whole world would have had it drummed into their consciousness: another
hate crime against a poor, innocent Black by White racists in Fayetteville.
In order to convince the media
bosses that he was doing something to “end hate” after the Burmeister shooting
of the Black drug dealer, the commanding general of Fort Bragg ordered a witch
hunt among the White soldiers on the base. Every White soldier was checked for
tattoos that might suggest a skinhead affiliation. As the media frenzy
continued, the witch hunt for White racists in the Army eventually spread to
other bases. Now, don’t hold your breath waiting for the general at Fort Bragg
to start questioning Black soldiers about their racial beliefs and their gang
affiliations because of what Blacks from the base did to White soldier Donald
Lange. The media pressure just isn’t there, and the general has better things
to do with his time.
Last month a Black mob in Alton,
Illinois, which is a suburb of St. Louis, beat a White man to death who had
made the mistake of coming into their neighborhood looking for his stolen
television set. As they were beating and kicking 48-year-old Richard Skelton to
death on August 10, the Blacks hooted, laughed, and shouted racial insults,
according to a number of eye-witnesses.
Now, it’s possible that you may have
read a few words about this racially motivated murder – if you’re a careful
reader of the small news items in the back pages of your newspaper. But you
certainly didn’t see anything about it on television or read any detailed news
accounts, unless you live in the immediate vicinity of Alton. Even the news
accounts in Alton tried to excuse the Black murderers by suggesting that
Skelton may have precipitated the attack on himself by using racially
insensitive language in asking about his stolen television set. But there is no
dispute about the facts. Blacks began beating the unarmed White man. Black
bystanders watched and shouted encouragement to the attackers. Others joined in
the attack, and soon as many as 25 Blacks were beating and kicking Skelton.
They continued kicking him until he was dead.
Again, imagine the response of the
controlled mass media if the races of the victim and the killers had been
reversed: a Black wanders into a White neighborhood and is beaten to death by a
mob of 25 Whites who laugh and shout racial insults as the Black dies. My god,
the media would be apoplectic! They would be calling for martial law and a
roundup of all heterosexual White males who weren’t registered Democrats.
Everybody in the world would be hearing about the killing over and over and
over again, along with sermons against White racism. But as it is, most of my
listeners are now hearing about last month’s racially motivated mob murder of
Richard Skelton for the first time.
Here’s another one that you may have
read a few words about if you’re a news hound or if you live in eastern New
York state. Earlier this month in Poughkeepsie, New York, a town on the Hudson
River about 70 miles north of New York City, police discovered the decomposing
corpses of seven White women and one Black woman in the house of Kendall
Francois. The women had been murdered over a two-year period, with the latest
being killed just a month ago. Francois is a 27-year-old Black man who works as
a hall monitor in a nearby high school. Affirmative action got him the school
job even though he had a previous arrest record. Francois was living with his
mother and father and younger sister – and eight decaying corpses. Police found
the dead women lying on beds and in the midst of piles of rotting garbage in
various rooms of his house. Francois’s parents and his sister, who is employed
as a nurse at a nearby hospital, said that they hadn’t worried about the stench
from the dead women because they thought it was the odor of the garbage which
had been allowed to accumulate in the house. Francois had picked up the women,
one at a time, taken them to his house, had sex with them, and then strangled
them.
Now, in a sense the murders of these
women may not have been race crimes. The women were all prostitutes, and aside
from the fact that Francois had a preference for killing White prostitutes, we
don’t really know what his motive was for killing them. And I should add that I
believe that any White woman, prostitute or not, who consents to sexual
relations with a Black deserves death, so I cannot really condemn Francois for
killing them.
The real racial angle to these
killings is the media response – or lack thereof. Do you remember John Wayne Gacy
or Jeffrey Dahmer? I’m sure you do, even though Gacy was arrested 20 years ago
and Dahmer more than seven years ago. Both of them also were serial killers who
stashed the bodies of their victims in or under their houses. Both received
enormous publicity when police caught them – so much that we still remember
them many years later. But they were both White.
Gacy and Dahmer, of course, received
extraordinarily heavy media coverage not because they were White, but because
their shocking crimes were extraordinarily newsworthy. Francois has received
almost no media coverage outside the Poughkeepsie area, not because his
shocking crimes were not extraordinarily newsworthy, but because he is Black
and most of his victims were White.
Earlier this month a court in
Colorado convicted Francisco Martinez of participating in the abduction, gang
rape, torture, and murder of a 14-year-old White girl, Brandy Duvall. Martinez
and six other members of the Black and Hispanic Bloods gang grabbed Brandy from
a bus stop in Denver on the night of May 30, last year. They took the young
White girl to the house of one of the gang members and spent several hours
raping her and then sexually torturing her with a knife and a broomstick.
During the trial one of the gang members told the court how Martinez laughed as
he repeatedly rammed a broomstick into the body of the bleeding girl while she
screamed and pleaded for her life. Later they stabbed the 14-year-old girl 28
times and dumped her body in a ditch. Then they went home and disposed of the
bloody mattress on which she had been raped and tortured.
Four of the Bloods gang members have
pleaded guilty, one other besides Martinez has been tried and convicted, and
one is still awaiting trial. This case is reminiscent of the Fayetteville
murders last month of two White girls by members of the Crips. The Crips and
the Bloods are the two largest non-White gangs in the United States. Like the
Fayetteville murders, Brandy Duvall’s murder and the subsequent trials have
received virtually no national news coverage, although Denver-area newspapers
did report them.
Once again, imagine the reaction of
the television networks and all of the other national media if instead of the
Bloods raping, sexually torturing, and murdering a 14-year-old White girl,
seven Ku Klux Klan members had done that to a Black girl or a Mexican girl. The
gruesome details would be on every television screen in America night after
night after night, and there would be no end to the parade of politicians and
preachers and professional hate merchants telling us about the evils of White
racism. We know that’s what would happen, because we have seen it before in far
less egregious cases, most recently in the dragging death of the Black convict
in Jasper, Texas, this summer.
Now, all of the Black-on-White
crimes I’ve just mentioned – the stomping of Donald Lange by Black soldiers in
Fayetteville until he became a mindless vegetable; the kicking of Richard
Skelton to death by a Black mob in Alton, Illinois, when he tried to retrieve
his stolen television set; the murder of seven White prostitutes by a Black
school monitor in Poughkeepsie, New York; the horrible rape, torture, and
murder of 14-year-old Brandy Duvall by members of the Bloods gang in the Denver
area after they had snatched her from a bus stop – all of these either occurred
during the past month or came to trial during the past month. And I could have
given you twenty more recent examples of horrible race crimes committed by
non-Whites against Whites which have received the silent treatment by the
media, except in the areas where they occurred. And these are all crimes which
would have received extensive national publicity if they had been
White-on-Black crimes.
Anyway, I hope that I’ve made my
point. And my point is that the controlled media are far more likely to
publicize White-on-Black crimes than Black-on-White crimes. And this is not
just a fluke. It’s not that I have carefully selected a few Black-on-White
crimes which somehow escaped the attention of the media. No, their way of
dealing with interracial crime is systematic. It is consistent. We all
understand that. If the Ku Klux Klan does something, the Jewish media act as if
the sky is falling. If the Bloods or the Crips do something, they ignore it.
There is no denying that. We know it’s true.
So why do they do it? If I ask a
non-Jewish newspaper writer or television reporter or magazine editor: “Why do
you and your colleagues minimize the news of Black-on-White crime? Why are you
protective of non-White organizations such as the Bloods and the Crips? Don’t
you believe that you have a responsibility to warn the White public about the
dangers posed for us by non-White crime in general and by non-White gangs such
as the Bloods and the Crips in particular?
“And why do your colleagues maximize
the news of any White-on-Black crime? Why do you go ballistic if there’s any
possibility of a White organizational connection, even if some racially
oriented literature is found in the White offender’s possession? Don’t you
understand that the Bloods and the Crips are essentially anti-White criminal
organizations, while the Klan can only be accused of having members who
sometimes do stupid things? Why do you deliberately create the false impression
in the public mind that White-on-Black crime – that’s what you call “hate
crime” – is a big problem in our society, and at the same time you hide from
the public the truly horrendous and dangerous problem of Black-on-White crime?
Why do you do it?”
I’ve never gotten really clear and
honest answers to these questions. But what is clear is that they all know how
they’re expected to report the news. They know what the party line is. They
know which side their bread is buttered on. It’s clear that the top media
bosses have set the fashion for reporting interracial crime, and no one who
works for them is willing to depart from the fashion.
That fashion, which is almost never
stated explicitly, which is only implied, is this: White people are evil –
especially heterosexual White males. They have persecuted non-Whites for
hundreds of years. White people really shouldn’t complain if non-Whites
sometimes strike back at them. That’s only justice. When Blacks and Mexicans
organize in gangs, it’s only to protect themselves from Whites. But when Whites
organize, it’s to oppress non-Whites. Whites need to be reminded that they are
oppressors. That’s why White crimes against non-Whites should be emphasized.
And if we’re to have a happy and prosperous multicultural society with lots of diversity,
which is of course a wonderful thing, then Whites need to mix more with
non-Whites . . . so we shouldn’t give them any news which might make them
reluctant to mix. We shouldn’t tell them about Black crimes against Whites,
because that might frighten White women away from Black men. It might even lead
Whites to organize against non-Whites. In the long run the only sure way to
have a peaceful society, in which everyone gets along with everyone else, is to
get rid of the White majority: to replace the present White majority with a
non-White majority. A lot of racial mixing and racial intermarriage will help
to achieve that, and we should report the news with that aim in mind.
That is the prevailing fashion in
the controlled mass media today, whether the media people will admit it or not.
That fashion has been set deliberately by the media bosses. And I, curious and
inquisitive person that I am, have looked at where that fashion is taking us,
and when I have done that I have looked into the face of death: racial death,
racial extinction. And I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have decided that the
Jewish media bosses who designed the current fashion in reporting the news have
in fact designed it with that aim in mind. And I also have decided that it is our
responsibility to ourselves, to our posterity, to our ancestors, and to the God
of Nature which made us what we are to use any and all means – any and all
means – to combat these Jewish media bosses and their collaborators in the
government, in the schools, in the churches, and wherever else we find them.
Wednesday, June 17, 2020
The jewish Post-War Ethnic Cleansing of German Silesia and Breslau
Source: http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-jewish-post-war-ethnic-cleansing-of-german-silesia-and-breslau/
The Post-War Ethnic Cleansing of German Silesia
Stolen Heritage: German Silesia
In the parts of Germany taken for Poland in
1945, the entire ethnic German population was either murdered, expelled or
faced severe reprisals at war’s end. As cited elsewhere, in East Prussia and
Pomerania, from Danzig to Stettin to Elbing and to all of the old Baltic German
cities, catastrophic jewish Allied bombing was followed by jewish Red Terror.
The few surviving Germans in these areas were placed before violent judeo
Communist led “verification” committees who decided their fate. Their language
and civil rights were immediately suspended. Thousands died trying to flee.
Slave labor camps in Poland included, among those run by the infamously
sadistic Salomon Morel and Czesław Gęborski, the Central Labour Camp Jaworzno,
Central Labour Camp Potulice, Łambinowice, Zgoda labour camp and others. Aside
from being thrown into one of these 1,255 “labor” camps under Polish
administration in early 1945, it was estimated that about 165,000 Germans were
deported to slave labor in the Soviet Union from the German territories annexed
de-facto by Poland.
With German defeat in 1945, all of
Silesia was suddenly occupied by the jewish Soviet Red Army who, following
their violent pattern, embarked upon another horrendous spree of rape. In one
instance, 182 Catholic nuns were raped in Neisse and in the diocese of
Kattowitz, they left behind 66 pregnant nuns. Even small children were not
spared the horrors of violent sexual assault, and little girls were being
attacked as often as their mothers. Boys who tried to protect their mothers and
sisters were shot, as were many of the victims afterward.
Churchill proposed the genocidal
plan adopted at the 1945 Potsdam Conference for putting Poland “on wheels” and
“rolling it westward” into German lands. As a result of his final solution to
the “German problem,” millions of Poles were displaced from territories granted
to the USSR and even more millions of Germans were expelled from lands they had
inhabited since the 13th century.
Silesian Germans, some of whom had
roots in Silesia going back centuries, and who before World War II amounted to
about 4 million, were collectively labelled “German partisans” and either fled
or were murdered, put in camps, sent to the jewish Gulags or expelled. Often, the
men would be rounded up from the villages and camps and marched a short
distance away, shot and buried in mass graves. Under the terms of the
agreements at the Yalta Conference of 1944 and the Potsdam Agreement of 1945,
German Silesia east of the rivers Oder and Lusatian Neisse was transferred to
Poland. Poles from lands stolen by Stalin were trucked in and resettled there
before the blood had even dried. The Germans were sometimes ordered to not only
leave all of their possessions behind, they were ordered to leave the beds made
with clean linen. It was efficient, well-planned and organized.
An order of expulsion was placed
upon the expellees by Communist Section Commander Major Zinkowski:
1. On July 14, 1945 from 6 to 9 oclock resettlement of the German
population will take place.
2. The German population will be resettled to an area west of the river
Neisse.
3. Each German is allowed to take 20kg of luggage with him at the most.
4. No means of transportation (wagons, oxen, horses, cows etc) is
permitted.
5. The total of the living and dead inventory in an undamaged state
remains the property of Poland.
6. The last resettlement deadline will terminate on the 14th of July at
10 o’clock.
7. Noncompliance with this order will be punished severely, including
the use of weapons.
8. Sabotage and looting will also be prevented by the use of weapons.
9. Assembly point on the street station Bad Salzbrunn Edelsbacher Weg in
a four person marching column. The head of the column is to be 20 meters before
the village of Adelsbach.
10. Those Germans who have a certified non-evacuation order, are not
permitted to leave their dwelling with their family members from 5 o’clock to
14:00.
11. All dwellings in the city must remain open; all apartment and house
keys must be left outside.
Breslau
Thousands of Breslau civilians had
waited to evacuate the city when they heard news of the jewish Soviet advance
on January 14, 1945.They could not evacuate until 6 days later because of rail
damage and battles. In panic and desperation, 50,000 to 60,000 left on foot,
mostly women and children, in bitter winter weather. In the process, some
18,000 frozen bodies were recovered along their trails and 70 children were
crushed to death under wagon wheels. 90,000 Breslauers are thought to have died
in the trek. Partly because they realized the hopelessness of evacuating, another
200,000 or so civilians remained in the inner city, and by February 15, the
Soviet noose tightened around them. Breslau was the last major city in eastern
Germany to fall on May 7, 1945.
Although the city was only bombed
once, massive destruction took place in the aftermath. Breslau was largely
destroyed. The medieval parts of the city and almost all historical landmarks
were gutted. The buildings that escaped bomb damage were burned and looted by
the jewish Soviets. It was said there was a murdered, disfigured or
disemboweled German hung on every lamp post in the city.
The entire youth of Germany, boys of
14 to 17 years, and the Volkstrum, consisting of old men, were all the defense
that was left during these last days of war. These pitiful troops were all that
stood between Germany and Armageddon. Over a thousand of these boys arrived to
defend Breslau where they awaited the Russian onslaught. Many of the youngest
boys killed themselves out of sheer terror while others fought on desperately
for days until the city finally fell on May 6, 1945.
The 40,000 survivors of the German
garrison who surrendered were executed, thrown into mass graves or taken to the
Gulag, from which few returned. Over 30,000 more civilians would die, most from
homicide, but there were also about 3,000 suicides. The jewish led Red Army
went house to house and block to block embarking on vicious rape and slaughter.
For 77 days, the carnage and mayhem lasted, the Soviets murdering and burning
people alive. Thousands of Breslauers lay dead in the ruins, and the city was
almost 70% destroyed. Like most of Silesia, Breslau was placed under Polish
administration. Most surviving German inhabitants were expelled and all German
property was taken. By the 1950s, Breslau had been cleansed of most of its
dried blood as well as remaining Germans and the real history of the city.
Renamed “Wrocław,” it was resettled with Poles.
It was not just adults who were
expelled from their homes. Children became adults overnight when suddenly
orphaned or when separated from their parents, and they had to face the hard
and dangerous treks alone, at the mercy of the elements and vicious predators.
The violence used to obliterate the ethnic memory of Germans was degrading and
often fatal.
Reduced to slaves by their new
masters, Germans were forced to make public apologies for their “collective
guilt” at social and governmental gatherings. Others were sent to camps with
unbearable conditions. Of 8,064 Germans in Camp Lamsdorf in Upper Silesia,
6,488, including hundreds of children, died from starvation, disease, hard
labor, and physical maltreatment including torture. This repeated itself by the
thousands. Illness brought on by bad water, starvation, exposure and even
poisoning was rampant and suicides epidemic. Five times as many Germans died in
the first year after the War’s end as died during five of the War itself.
It is interesting to note that not
all Germans were expelled: in the Opole/Oppeln region in Upper Silesia. Some
German miners and their families were “allowed” to stay, but their culture was
repressed and they were virtual slaves. German language remained forbidden for
the next forty years. Forced out at gunpoint, old and young, rich and poor had
to leave their family homes behind furnished and unlocked for the new
inhabitants. The Oder-Neisse as the border of a new post-war Germany was
deceptively described as “tentative” until a final peace settlement with
Germany. The issue was not laid to rest by Germany until it was forced to sign
it as the high price for German reunification: some or nothing at all.
Sunday, June 14, 2020
Friday, June 12, 2020
The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”
An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious
“Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust
Controversies” Bloggers
by Carlo Mattogno, Thomas Kues and Jürgen Graf
Published: 2013-10-23
Ever since the authors of the
present study started publishing, together or separately, thorough studies
about the most prominent German camps of the WWII era which are generally
referred to as extermination camps, orthodox historians have made it a point to
intentionally ignore these studies which they seem unable to refute. This eerie
silence ended only in late 2011 when several members of the exterminationist Holocaust
Controversies blog published a 570 page-long online study titled Belzec,
Sobibor, Treblinka: Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard. With it they
claim to refute three of our authors’ monographs on the camps Belzec, Sobibor
and Treblinka (see vols. 9, 19 and 8 of the Holocaust Handbooks series).
This lengthy orthodox critique
forced our three authors to go back to the sources. After a year of archival
and library research, the rebuttal of their detractors’ critique was finally
complete, and a few months later Mattogno’s major contributions to it were
translated into English. The opus seemed ready for publication. What followed
next, though, was an arduous, 6-months-lasting process of thorough
fact-checking and archival verification by peer reviewers as well as massive
lingual improvements by numerous editors. The results are out in the open now:
a work comprising more than 1,500 pages.
This work has occupied the
most knowledgeable revisionists for a year and more. It has led to the
postponement of numerous other projects (as can easily be gleaned from this
website as well). Today’s leading revisionists consider this their ultimate
response and final word on the subject. From now on they have promised to focus
on more productive research and publications.
As to the contents of this
book, the casual reader may be warned: This work cannot be read like a novel.
It is a point-by-point response to the above-mentioned Holocaust
Controversies bloggers’ PDF file (accessible on their website) and can be
understood only in that context. It also requires that the reader be familiar
with the authors’ three monographs on the Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka camps,
all of which can be accessed and downloaded on this website.
It goes without saying that it
is neither easy nor profitable to publish such a huge two-volume opus which
will find only a very small audience. In order to make the text a little more
readable and to reduce the volume of the printed version slightly, it does
include only the English translations of any foreign language sources quoted.
The full foreign language text can be found in the extended PDF version. Since
this PDF file is accessible to everyone and can thus be searched, we have
refrained from creating a cost-prohibitive index.
In summarizing the book’s
conclusions, Jürgen Graf writes in his Epilogue:
"Holocaust Controversies
had all the time they needed to write their “refutation.” They were assisted by
a host of Holocaust historians they diligently enumerate in their introduction.
It did not help them a bit. […] Since the exterminationist position with
regards to these two topics [gas chambers and eyewitnesses] is hopeless from
the beginning, Myers had myriads of opportunities to make a fool of himself,
and he missed not a single one of them. […]
However, the most preposterous
chapters of the pamphlet are undoubtedly the two last ones, written by […]
Roberto Muehlenkamp, who unsuccessfully tried to prove that during World War II
the eternal laws of nature had to pause so that the evil Nazis could carry out
their massacre in chemical slaughterhouses and get rid of the bodies without
significant use of fuel. [Muehlenkamp] knew exactly that Mattogno, who has an
encyclopedic knowledge of all problems related to cremation, would react to his
challenge and make mincemeat of his chapters, to use Romanov’s poetic formulation
for the last time. Is Muehlenkamp perhaps a masochist? Does he relish the role
of the circus clown who is pelted with eggs to the roaring laughter of the
audience? Now he has egg all over his face. I do not feel a bit sorry for him
because he asked for it."
Note
This book exists in two
versions: a “short” printed version which does not include most of the foreign
language quotes, and an extended PDF version which includes all foreign
language quotes. The print version’s PDF files can be downloaded with the usual
links below. The extended PDF version of 1554 pp. is available here (37.7 MB).
2nd, slightly corrected edition, Set of 2 tomes
with a total of 1396 pages.
Tome 1: 712 pp. ISBN13: 9781591480877 (ISBN10: 1591480876)
Tome 2: 684 pp. ISBN13: 9781591480884 (ISBN10: 1591480884)
Format: pb, 6"×9", bibliography.
Published by Castle Hill Publishers (Uckfield, UK) in Apr. 2015.
For prices please see retail outlets.
Tome 1: 712 pp. ISBN13: 9781591480877 (ISBN10: 1591480876)
Tome 2: 684 pp. ISBN13: 9781591480884 (ISBN10: 1591480884)
Format: pb, 6"×9", bibliography.
Published by Castle Hill Publishers (Uckfield, UK) in Apr. 2015.
For prices please see retail outlets.
Purchase Options
Note: Books published by Castle Hill Publishers
should be available anywhere books are sold – except for those companies
boycotting us, like Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Search other online stores
using the book-price search-engine links provided below, or when searching
other stores use the ISBN number provided above. Also ask your local book store
to order it for you. They should be able to get it for you.
Tuesday, June 9, 2020
Saturday, June 6, 2020
While US is in Crisis, Congress Posts 68 Bills (and Counting) for Israel
At the request of Democratic leaders, President
Trump ordered last week that US flags on DC federal buildings fly at half-staff
“in memory of the Americans we have lost to the Coronavirus.” Justice advocates
also grieve at the persistence of pro-Israel legislation in Congress.
In the chaos that is the US – with
coronavirus, racial tension, deep divisions, highly contested elections – Israel
continues to hold sway over Capitol Hill. Congress members toil unwaveringly to
win massive military aid money and special treats for the Jewish State with 68
pieces of legislation focused on Israel.
by Kathryn Shihadah
Back in January 2019, immediately
after the swearing-in ceremony for the new Congress, advocacy for Israel began.
On that first day, the Senate introduced a pro-Israel bill; the House
introduced 3. By the end of 2019, lawmakers had presented over
50 pieces of
legislation favoring Israel.
2020 pro-Israel bills have been
arriving at a somewhat slower pace (as of this writing, the number stands at
18), but most of last year’s bills are still in circulation. At the end of this
year, every bill that has not become law will die. The process starts over with
the new Congress in January 2021.
Especially given this year’s massive
financial disruption from COVID-19, Americans should be aware of our country’s lavish
spending habits toward Israel – and not only because we need to be generally more frugal. Israel has
a long, ugly record of human rights violations, the likes of which have been chronicled in detail by numerous human rights
organizations.
Below is a description of pro-Israel
bills that have been introduced in Congress in 2020 (grouped by subject),
followed by a listing of bills that support justice for Palestinians (as of
this writing, there is only one).
For the list of 50+ pro-Israel bills
(and 2 that advocate for Palestinians) presented in 2019, please go here.
Pro-Israel
legislation: military aid
S.3176 – “US-Israel
Security Assistance Authorization Act of 2020” (To amend the Foreign Assistance
Act of 1961 and the US-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 to make
improvements to certain defense and security assistance provisions and to
authorize the appropriations of funds to Israel, and for other purposes).
This is the Senate version of House
bill H.R.1837, which was passed last July (read
about it here). The bill outlines the US promise
to give Israel a minimum of $3.8 billion a year for the next ten years. In
addition, it would give the President authority to provide Israel with
unlimited weaponry and assistance without prior authorization from Congress.
These bills contradict the Leahy
Laws, which clearly state that, in the words of principal sponsor Sen. Patrick
Leahy (D-VT), “when credible evidence of human rights violations exists, US aid
must stop.” (For more on the Leahy Laws, read this.)
S.3176 passed the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee on May 21, using several unscrupulous procedures. As Alison
Weir reports,
First, Senate Committee Chairman Jim Risch
(R-Idaho) refused to allow a livestream of the meeting, despite the fact
that the Senate Rules panel had recommended that extra efforts be taken to
ensure public transparency while the Capitol is closed to the public and the
presence of reporters is severely limited. The Senate’s Press Gallery Standing
Committee of Correspondents had objected strongly to Risch’s decision.
Second, the bill was passed without being
named, debated, or even discussed, even though it would set into law the largest such aid package in U.S.
history. There has been no US mention of the bill by US mainstream media.
Notably, a “manager’s amendment” to
S.3176 replaced the entire content of the original
bill with new text – and this text was not made public until after the
conclusion of the hearing.
This pro-Israel bill also provides
millions in new funding for various additional programs and programs benefiting
Israel. As analyst Lara Friedman reports, the bill authorizes “funding for
programs designed to make enhanced/expanded US-Israel cooperation part of the
DNA of more and more U.S. government agencies.” It also establishes programs
“that in effect recruit U.S. agencies/funding to the cause of expanding Israel’s
relations and influence in the region (i.e., open normalization by Arab states)
and around the world.”
There are a number of additional
perks, including requiring NASA to work with the Israeli Space Agency, despite
accusations of Israeli espionage.
As the US grapples with its
Covid-induced economic devastation, Israel’s $3.8 billion aid package is
expected to remain intact – this even as Israel actively removes Palestinians’ protections from the virus.
Introduced Jan. 9 by Sen. Marco
Rubio (R-FL). Cosponsors to date: D – 19, R – 19.
Pro-Israel
legislation: Israeli-exceptionalism bills
H.R.5595 – the “Israel Anti-Boycott Act” (To impose additional prohibitions
relating to foreign boycotts under Export Control Reform Act of 2018, and for
other purposes).
H.R.5595 is the latest in a string
of pro-Israel bills that many experts consider a violation of Americans’ right to free speech.
The bill would halt attempts to
disrupt businesses that partner with illegal Israeli settlements. This same
nonviolent strategy was instrumental in bringing down apartheid in South
Africa.
Past anti-boycott bills have
targeted businesses, organizations, and individuals; the current bill also
targets global organizations – specifically the United Nations, which recently published a database of over 100 companies
doing business in illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land. The human
rights expert behind the effort “urged UN Member States to implement laws
banning the import of goods produced in illegal settlements located in any
occupied territory.”
The American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) has stated
unequivocally that
anti-boycott legislation interferes with free speech, and is therefore
unconstitutional. Nevertheless, thanks to pro-Israel influence, Congress has
considered not less than 22
anti-BDS bills; 28 states have adopted anti-BDS laws (a
number of these are being challenged).
President of the Foundation for
Middle East Peace (FMEP) and Middle East foreign policy expert, Lara Friedman, explains that anti-BDS legislation conflates
voluntary political free speech – taking a stand against Israeli policy – with
a type of coercive boycott that does not resemble the BDS movement.
The Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions
(BDS) movement is, in its own words,
a Palestinian-led movement for freedom, justice
and equality. BDS upholds the simple principle that Palestinians are entitled
to the same rights as the rest of humanity.
Israel is occupying and colonizing Palestinian
land, discriminating against Palestinian citizens of Israel and denying
Palestinian refugees the right to return to their homes. Inspired by the South
African anti-apartheid movement, the BDS call urges action to pressure Israel
to comply with international law.
Introduced Jan. 13 by Lee Zeldin
(R-NY-1). Cosponsors to date: D – 1, R – 63.
S.Res. 570 –
A resolution opposing and condemning the potential prosecution of United States
and Israeli nationals by the International Criminal Court.
As mentioned above, the ICC is a
“court of last resort,” where it is possible to try individuals when their home
country is unwilling or unable to do so. The allegations of American war crimes
in Afghanistan, and Israeli war crimes in Israel/Palestine could be resolved if
the US and Israel would self-investigate.
Instead of calling for due process
in the home countries of the accused, however, the pro-Israel bill S.Res.570
calls for impunity – for American citizens and citizens of one other selected
country.
Introduced on May 12 by Sen. Ted
Cruz (R-TX). Cosponsors to date: D – 0, R – 0.
S.3775 – “The United States Israel
Military Capability Act” (A bill to establish a United States-Israel
Operations-Technology Working Group, and for other purposes).
The senators believe that the US government has a
“national security and moral imperative” to guarantee that American soldiers’
weapons are second to none.
Foundation for Defense of
Democracies (recognized as an arm of the Israel lobby) reports that the pro-Israel bill S.3775
seeks to create a “permanent and dedicated forum” for “[sharing]
intelligence-informed military capabilities.”
Israel’s behavior in this regard is
extremely problematic. It has a record of stealing US technology and selling it
to others, including to adversaries.
Israel has also developed advanced
weapons systems and sold them all over the world – including to countries known to be human
rights abusers. Although the US has bankrolled Israel’s Iron Dome for nine
years, when the American military wanted to purchase its own Iron Dome systems,
Israel refused to provide vital source codes.
Israel has also used its advanced
surveillance technology to spy on the US repeatedly in spite of
the fact that the US has given Israel over $230
billion in aid
since 1946.
Introduced by Sen. Gary Peters
(D-MI) on May 20. Cosponsors to date: D – 0, R – 1.
S.3722
and H.R.6829 To authorize funding for a bilateral cooperative program with Israel
for the development of health technologies with a focus on combating COVID-19
(over two weeks after the legislation was introduced, the text is not
available).
In its letter to activists,
exhorting them to contact Congress members, AIPAC proclaims, “Israel is a world leader in medical
innovation, and increased U.S.-Israel collaboration will greatly benefit the
American public.”
Other organizations offered a fuller
perspective of Israel vis-a-vis the pandemic.
Human Rights Watch reported that the temporary disruptions
Israelis are experiencing shed some light on the experience of Palestinians
living under occupation:
…far more sweeping restrictions on movement
have been the norm for decades. Since 2007, Israeli authorities have largely
sealed off the Gaza Strip, banning the movement of 2 million Palestinians
living there outside of “exceptional humanitarian cases” and maintaining a
formal “policy
of separation”
between Gaza and the West Bank. Israel’s closure of Gaza, which is vastly
disproportionate to any concrete security threat, separates thousands of
Palestinians from relatives in the West Bank, inside Israel, and abroad.
Unlike the temporary COVID-19 measures to
protect Israelis, these long-standing restrictions are not meant to protect
Palestinians and are not going away anytime soon.
Israel has reportedly closed
down Palestinian
COVID-19 testing sites, continued (in one case, escalated) its nightly routine of raiding homes, arresting
Palestinians – including minors – and demolishing Palestinian homes and businesses.
Israeli soldiers and settlers have also allegedly been spitting
on Palestinians.
Israeli security forces, wearing
protective masks as a precaution during the Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic,
stand on guard in the old city of Jerusalem on the Orthodox Christian holiday
of Holy Friday on April 17, 2020. (AFP)
Introduced by Rep. Chris Pappas (D-NH-1)
on May 12, 2020 and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on May 13, 2020. Senate
cosponsors
to date: D – 3, R – 3; House
cosponsors
to date: D – 4, R – 3.
H.R.5605 – United
States-Israel PTSD Collaborative Research Act (To direct the Secretary
of Defense to carry out a grant program to increase cooperation on
post-traumatic stress disorder research between the United States and Israel).
Israelis have indeed witnessed
violence: spates of stabbings and the infamous “rain of rockets” that have sent
them scrambling for shelter (for facts on Gaza rockets, read this and this).
The rocket phenomenon in Gaza began in 2001,
after the Israeli military had already killed hundreds of Gazan Palestinians.
In fact those “rockets” have in most cases been small, homemade projectiles – many
without explosive capability – and in 19 years have caused 30 Israeli deaths. In the same time
period, Israeli airstrikes have killed over 4,000 Gazan men, women, and children
(this number does not include Palestinians in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, or
Israel).
At least 10,006 Palestinians and
1,271 Israelis have been killed by someone from the other side since 2000. (israelpalestinetimeline.org)
Overall, the death toll of
Palestinians and Israelis is both tragic and lopsided: since 2000, over 10,000
Palestinians and 1,200 Israelis have been killed. Vox reports that since 2005,
23 out of every 24 conflict-related deaths have been Palestinian.
Tragically, Palestinians’
experiences would provide a more abundant field for PTSD research.
Palestine has the heartbreaking
distinction of having one of the highest rates of mental illness in the world –
thanks to generations of oppression. For example, 1 in 4 Palestinian
adolescents have attempted suicide, according to the World Journal of Medical
Sciences.
Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP)
has found that 54% of Gazan children who
experienced heavy bombardment in the 2014 Israeli incursion known as Operation
Protective Edge, suffer from severe PTSD, with symptoms including flashbacks
and nightmares.
Palestinian
psychiatrist and member of the Palestinian Ministry of Health, Dr. Samah Jabr, says of such statistics,
What is sick, the context or the
person? In Palestine, we see many people whose symptoms – unusual emotional
reaction or a behaviors – are a normal reaction to a pathogenic context.
Palestinian children gather outside
a United Nations-run school in the northern Gaza Strip. The head of the United
Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in Gaza, Pernille Ironside, said that nearly 400,000 Gaza kids were
in urgent need of psychological and social support to overcome the trauma they
experienced during the 2014 Israeli genocidal attacks on the besieged Palestine
enclave. (Reuters)
One in four children in Gaza require
psychosocial support.Israeli violence has made the Palestinian population a
rich source for PTSD research. Palestinians have endured not stabbings, but machine
guns, snipers, and tanks
armed with missiles;
not rains of rockets, but rains of illegal
white phosphorus
and one-ton
bombs; not
intermittent restaurant attacks, but tens
of thousands of home demolitions and hundreds
of thousands of detentions (including over
50,000 children
since the beginning of the occupation), and the relentless cheapening
and degradation of life. (For more on Palestinian and Israeli experiences of violence, read this.)
But if the US wants to study PTSD in
combat veterans, a good starting place would be Breaking the Silence:
Breaking the Silence is an organization of
veteran soldiers who have served in the Israeli military since the start of the
Second Intifada and have taken it upon themselves to expose the Israeli public
to the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories.
We endeavor to stimulate public debate about the
price paid for a reality in which young soldiers face a civilian population on
a daily basis, and are engaged in the control of that population’s everyday
life. Our work aims to bring an end to the occupation.
Introduced Jan. 14 by Rep. Mike
Waltz (R-FL-6). Cosponsors to date: D – 25, R – 17.
S.3409 and
H.R.6392
“Secure United States Bases Act” (To modify the conditions and terms of all
foreign military training programs operated within the United States by the
Department of Defense and the Department of State).
These pro-Israel bills would create
a new, nonimmigrant visa category for foreign military students in Department
of Defense and Department of State training programs. Foreign military students
would be subject to comprehensive vetting to be eligible for the visa.
The requirements would apply
retroactively, but students from NATO states and Israel would be exempt.
These bills are a response to the
December 2019 deadly
attack at a US
military facility in Florida in which a Saudi national in military training
shot 11 people, killing 3.
Interestingly, while the Senate puts
great faith in Israeli military students’ loyalty to the US, it is well-known
that Israel has a history of spying on the US – even stealing military secrets – and was caught red-handed as recently as 2019.
In an article entitled “Israel Spies and Spies
and Spies,” Philip Giraldi, former CIA counterterrorism specialist adds, “The
fact is that Israel conducts espionage and influence operations against the
United States more aggressively than any other ‘friendly’ country.”
Nevertheless,
Israeli military trainees appear to be considered trustworthy.
Introduced March 5, 2020 by Sen. Rick
Scott (R-FL), and Rep. Michael Waltz (R-FL-6). Senate
cosponsors
to date: D – 0, R – 1; House
cosponsors
to date: D – 0, R – 1.
Pro-Israel legislation: Anti-Semitism-related
bills
H.Res.782
– Encouraging public schools to design and teach a curriculum about the history
of anti-Semitism and the Holocaust, and the vital importance of the Jewish
State of Israel.
The bill addresses the important
issues of anti-Semitism and Holocaust education, but then turns a corner to
once again target the peaceful Boycott, Divest, and Sanction movement (see
above).
It begins with a list of recent
anti-Semitic incidents and concludes with a call for all public schools to
design and teach a
curriculum about the history of anti-Semitism and the Holocaust, and the
historic importance of the creation of the Jewish State of Israel in 1948 that
served as a refuge for Jews all over the world to escape persecution following
the Holocaust.
The bill ignores the fact that the
creation of Israel was accomplished through a violent, massive ethnic cleansing
against the indigenous population. It also ignores the fact that projects to
create other refuges had been sabotaged by pro-Israel groups.
The legislation also blames the BDS
movement for “rampant anti-Semitism,” although this is broadly considered
untrue. As Lara Friedman points
out,
Fun fact: NONE of the attacks listed in the
resolution have anything to do with Israel or BDS. Yet the drafters make the
resolution about both. Another fun fact: A decade ago then-President Obama was attacked (viciously and over and over) for
using language mentioning the creation of Israel and the Holocaust in adjacent
sentences.
Palestinian children gather outside
a United Nations-run school in the northern Gaza Strip. The head of the United
Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in Gaza, Pernille Ironside, said that nearly 400,000 Gaza kids were
in urgent need of psychological and social support to overcome the trauma they
experienced during the 2014 Israeli genocidal attacks on the besieged Palestine
enclave. (Reuters)
The bill does not mandate anti-BDS
instruction, but leaves the content of the curriculum open to interpretation.
H.Res.837 (introduced Feb. 6 by Rep. William
Keating [D-MA-9]) similarly encourages European countries to teach about the Holocaust
and anti-Semitism. It does not name Israel, but does refer to “modern-day
anti-Semitism,” – commonly understood as a reference to anti-Zionism, an
ideology that opposes the “Jewish character of the State of Israel”
It is important to note that pro-Israel
groups regularly pressure school textbook companies to present an
Israel-centric version of history (read, for example, this, this, this, and this) and shut down student
organizations, professors, and curriculum that represent the Palestinian
perspective.
Introduced Jan. 9 by Rep. Ted Budd
(R-NC-13). Cosponsors to date: D – 0; R – 5.
Whereas
many European governments and the European Union have adopted the International
Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of anti-Semitism;
While the bill doesn’t report this,
the IHRA working definition includes certain criticisms of Israel
“antisemitic.” Thus, the resolution affirms an alleged “need” to cooperate in
combatting efforts in support of Palestinian human rights.
(interestingly, in the cases of H.Res.732 and H.Res.884, bills about white supremacism and
Islamophobia, the only cosponsors were Dems.)
Introduced Feb. 6 by Rep. William
Keating (D-MA-9). Cosponsors to date: D – 3; R – 1.
Pro-Israel
legislation: Iran-related bills
Israel has long targeted Iran as an
“existential threat.” For this reason, the Israel lobby has often pushed for
legislation in Congress that sanctions Iran. A separate report on Iran-related
bills will be coming soon.
The single bill that is (peripherally)
pro-Palestine:
H.Res.855 – “Expressing
the sense of the House of Representatives that the US should ratify the Rome
Statute and join the International Criminal Court.”
The International Criminal Court
(ICC) is a “court of last resort” to “bring to
justice the perpetrators of the worst crimes known to humankind” – crimes of
genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity – when national courts can
not or will not do so.
This resolution refers to the fact
that the United States has never become a member of the ICC. Various groups and individual politicians
(primarily Republican) have criticized the institution; others have denounced the critics for endorsing American
exceptionalism.
Israel walks hand-in-hand with the
US in defying the ICC, and has been resisting war crime investigations by the
body for years.
Recently, Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo vowed, “If the ICC continues down its
current course [toward prosecuting Israel], we will exact consequences.”
Notably, American politicians’ and
conservative think tanks’ dismiss the legitimacy of the ICC’s jurisdiction, not
the factual nature of the allegations against Israel (as well as those against
the US), which include crimes (committed by both Israel
and the Palestinians) in the Gaza War of 2014, in the building of Israeli
settlements on Palestinian land, and in the use of lethal force against
peaceful protesters at the Gaza border (apartheid – of which Israel has also
been accused – is also considered a crime against humanity).
Introduced Feb. 12 by Rep. Ilhan
Omar (D-MN-13). Cosponsors to date: D – 0, R – 0.
Kathryn Shihadah
is staff writer for If Americans Knew. She blogs at Palestine Home.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)