Did you ever wonder why the Jews are such great
proponents of democracy? Whether in Indonesia or Pakistan or Serbia or you name
it, whenever there is some threat to universal suffrage, the Jews are ready to
send the U.S. armed forces in to bomb and kill until everyone is permitted to
vote.
Why is that? Why can't the Indonesians have an Islamic
theocracy if they want? Why can't the Pakistanis have a military dictatorship?
Why can't the Serbs run their own country the way they prefer? What is the
appeal in making sure that people whose minds have been wasted by Alzheimer's
Disease vote? Well, let's not beat around the bush: the appeal of mass
democracy lies in the fact that in essentially every country in the world
today, the number of persons unable to think for themselves is substantially
larger than the number able to make independent decisions. Those unable to
think for themselves have their thinking done for them by the people who
control the mass media. Which is to say, democracy is the preferred system
because it gives the political power to those who own or control the mass media
and at the same time allows them to remain behind the scenes and evade
responsibility for the way in which they use that power. And the more inclusive
the democracy is -- that is, the more Alzheimer's sufferers and Mongoloid
cretins and paranoid schizophrenics and people who live in empty packing cases
in alleyways and Jamaican immigrants and football fans are able to vote -- the
more certain is the grip of the media masters on the political process.
Those voters who buy astrology magazines at the
checkout stand and spend their time watching soap operas, game shows, and Oprah
absorb their general attitudes on things through the television screen. They
learn which ideas are fashionable and which are not by noticing the facial expression
and tone of voice of Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather when the news is announced each day.
Their opinions on specific issues are formed as they view televised sidewalk
surveys taken by reporters. The only uncertainty about these people is whether
or not they'll be able to pry themselves loose from their couches long enough
to vote for the designated candidates. That's why it's important to have lots
of them.
And wherever there are lots of them, the men who
control the mass media also will control the outcome of elections. It's a much
surer way of controlling governments than bribing corrupt dictators or slipping
seductive whores into the king's bedroom a la Esther and Ahasuerus -- or
Monica and Bill.
Believe me, one day soon the Jews on both sides of the
great water will institute a web-TV voting system that allows the couch
potatoes and the ball game fans to vote without having to get up from their
couches, just by clicking their remote controls at their TV screens to select
the next President or prime minister. That will be real democracy.
You know, back close to the beginning of this century,
around 1901 or so, a book first was published containing the text of what
became generally known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The
publisher was a Russian academic, Professor Sergei Nilus. Nilus himself allegedly
had obtained The Protocols from a Russian official, who had obtained the
text from a patriotic Russian noblewoman, who in turn had purchased the
material from a Jew in Paris about 15 years earlier.
The Protocols purports to be a collection of minutes
or reports of meetings held by the leaders of the world Jewish community, at
which they summarize the progress they had made to that time in their quest for
world subversion, world ownership, and world power and outline their plans for continuing
the process in the future. They talk about gaining control of the banking
systems of various countries, about fomenting wars and revolutions to weaken
and destroy Gentile power, about corrupting music and art and education, about
subverting various Gentile institutions, about taking over the press everywhere
and controlling the flow of information to the masses, about undermining the
family and bringing family values into disrepute, and so on. The Elders of Zion
really are a satanic bunch of schemers. Reading The Protocols makes
one's flesh crawl.
We should remember that when The Protocols began
circulating in Russia in the first decade of this century, that country had not
yet fallen victim to Jewish Bolshevism, but that wasn't for lack of trying on
the part of the Jews. The Jews were generally recognized as a dangerously subversive
element in Russia, as the schemers and string pullers behind every attempt to
damage or upset the established order in Russia, and so Professor Nilus'
publication of The Protocols found a ready market among the Russian
public. After the Jewish Bolshevik revolution of 1917 overthrew the Russian
government and established a communist dictatorship in Russia, anyone found
with a copy of The Protocols was liable to be summarily shot. The text
already had been translated into a dozen other languages and distributed far
and wide outside Russia, however.
Since then it has been published in virtually every
language which has a printed form and has been read by tens of millions of
people around the world.
The Jews have been claiming hysterically since The
Protocols first appeared that the text is "a forgery." I guess
that's their way of saying that it's not what it purports to be: namely, the
actual minutes of meetings of Jewish leaders discussing their plans for world
domination. The great American industrialist and automaker Henry Ford was very
strongly impressed by The Protocols and helped circulate the text in the
United States. When told by newspaper reporters in 1921 about the Jews' claims
that The Protocols was "a forgery," Mr. Ford responded that
all he could say about the material was that it fit what was actually happening
in the world and had been happening ever since the The Protocols first
appeared in print.
Of course, what Mr. Ford had especially in mind when
he made that remark were two momentous things which had happened during the
previous decade. One was the Jews' success in taking over Russia and imposing
communism on the Russians, and the other was the recently ended First World
War: a horribly fratricidal and senseless war, which had destroyed the old order
in Europe, had spilled the blood of millions of the best Europeans, and had
weakened all of Europe's long-established institutions, leaving every European
country open to all manner of social, political, and cultural ills -- in
particular, to the further spread of communism.
Well, Henry Ford was a very hard-headed, practical
sort of man, and it's easy to understand his attitude. He had no way of knowing
whether or not The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was actually
what it purported to be, but he was quite impressed by the fact that the plan
for world subversion and domination by the Jews outlined in the book seemed to be
happening pretty much as described.
I'll go a step further than Henry Ford was willing to
go in assessing The Protocols. I think that they very likely are not
what they purport to be. In the first place the text of The Protocols doesn't
ring true. It's too straightforward, too open. It doesn't use the sort of
deceptive, weasel worded, self-justifying language that Jews customarily use in
expressing themselves, even to one another. When a group of Jewish leaders get
together to discuss their plans for the destruction of a host nation, they
don't use straightforward expressions such as "encouraging
miscegenation" and "leading the goyim to the slaughter."
They use weasel-expressions, such as "building tolerance,"
"increasing diversity," and "eliminating inequality." In
the second place, it's difficult for me to imagine the head Jews laying out
such a complete, self-contained, and pat explanation of what they're up to.
It's just too convenient for those of us who aim at alerting our people as to
what the Jews' intentions are and then putting a monkey wrench in their gears.
I wouldn't call The Protocols "a
forgery," as the Jews do whenever the book is mentioned. I'm inclined to
believe Professor Nilus was an astute observer of the Jews and also was a
patriot. He wanted to warn the Russian people of what the Jews were planning to
do to them, and so he imagined how the Jews' plan might look if it were all
laid out in straightforward language. I believe that he wrote the text he
published, but that he believed it was a reasonably accurate description of
what the Jews actually were doing. And the reason that The Protocols ended
up being translated into hundreds of languages and read by millions of people
is that many people, like Henry Ford, saw that they fitted what was happening.
Sometimes I have tried to imagine what Professor Nilus
might have written if he were writing today instead of a century ago -- and if
he were writing still in the straightforward sort of language he used earlier.
A 1999 version of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion might read
something like this: Greetings, my fellow Elders of Zion! Today I am happy to
report to you that our plan for the destruction of the hated Gentiles and the
acquisition of their remaining wealth is practically complete. There remain
only a few loose ends to tie up, and then the struggle in which we have been
engaged for thousands of years against the filthy goyim against the
Nations, against all the non-Jewish peoples of the world, finally will be
victorious, and we will be able to devour everything they have created, as
Yahweh, the god of our tribe, has commanded us.
Everywhere we already rule behind the scenes, with
puppets completely under our control in the offices of power. In Russia, where
they resisted us for so long -- where the ordinary people always hated us as
exploiters, as moneylenders and tax collectors and purveyors of alcohol and merchants
in the sweet, white flesh of their daughters and sisters, and where the
aristocrats also hated us, as subversives and troublemakers, and kept us
confined to only certain areas of the country, so that we could not exploit all
of the people -- in Russia we used the doctrine of our dear, departed Elder of
Zion, Karl Marx, to divide the Russian people against themselves and get the
power into our own hands, where it remains to this day. We butchered their Czar
and his whole family like the Gentile cattle they were. With the help of the
common people we slaughtered all of the Russian aristocrats and took their
wealth.
And then we turned on the common people. First we
murdered their leaders -- their writers and teachers and intellectuals and
military officers -- so that there would be no one able to turn them against
us, and then we began murdering the common people themselves, the farmers and workers,
first by the millions and then by the tens of millions in labor camps and death
camps all across Russia. And most of them never did understand what was
happening to them. One of them, who had been studying to become a Christian
priest, we corrupted and made into our ally.
His name was Stalin. Later, like the pharaoh who knew
not Joseph, Stalin tried to turn against us, but one of our women was his
doctor, and we poisoned him before he could harm us.
When the system based on the theory of our departed
Elder Marx had bled the Russian people dry, we launched a
"privatization" scheme, which put most of the remaining wealth which
had belonged to the government directly into our hands. Their gas and oil,
their forests and their lumber industry, their mines and factories -- and
especially their television broadcasting facilities -- are now owned by us
acting as capitalists. Today we have a drunken, sick, old Russian clown, Boris
Yeltsin, as the nominal leader of the Russians, but one of our people, Boris
Abramovich Berezovsky, tells him what to do and keeps him under tight control
through bribes.
In England, the country from which all of us were
expelled by the king as exploiters and troublemakers just over 700 years ago,
we now have another puppet, Tony Blair, in place as the nominal leader of the
English, but like Yeltsin he is completely under our control. One of our people,
Michael Levy, finances his election campaigns and controls his purse strings.
Another of our people, Jack Straw, controls his domestic policies.
America, however, is the prize example of our success.
Just as in England and in Russia, also in America we have been able to put a
totally corrupt Gentile politician into the position of nominal power and then
to surround him with our own people, who wield the real power. Actually running
the American government, our people are in charge of America's State
Department, America's Defense Department, America's Federal Reserve System, and
America's Treasury Department. When one of our people, Robert Rubin, retired
recently as secretary of the treasury, we simply moved another of our people,
Lawrence Summers, into that position. Clinton appoints to every high office in
the American government, whether the Supreme Court or his own cabinet, only
those people we suggest to him, and the totally corrupt politicians of the
Senate dare not disapprove anyone we suggest, lest we label them as
"anti-Semites." We have gained nearly complete control of America's
educational system, from kindergarten through the universities. No ideas or
facts may be taught unless we have given them the stamp of Political
Correctness. We have made it impossible for anyone in an American university to
contradict anything we have claimed, no matter how preposterous, about what
happened to us during the Second World War. We now have the American
government, just like every government in Europe, paying us
"reparations," because not enough was done for us during the war.
We have succeeded in corrupting and then dominating
America's art and music and literature.
We have made degeneracy the touchstone for American
culture. We own the art galleries and set the standards for painting and
sculpture. We have the Americans lining up and paying admission to see a
"work of art" which consists of animal dung smeared onto a crude
painting of a Negress, which we tell them is their Virgin Mary. They read the
depraved and trashy novels we tell them to read and believe that these novels
are "literature." Their children listen to Negroid rhythms and chant
Negroid "rap" ditties, because we control the popular music industry.
Through the immigration policy we have imposed on
America we are increasing the percentage of non-White minorities in every part
of the country. Within the next few years we will succeed in making White
Americans a minority in their own country.
Our success in America has been due to two things: our
control of the mass media of news and entertainment, through which we control
the ideas and attitudes of the masses; and the system of mass democracy, which
ensures that the votes of the masses under our control determine which figurehead
politicians actually make up the American government. Since the last part of
the 19th century we have been gathering the power of the mass media into our
hands. In those days many of us were only rag-pickers and dealers in used
merchandise, recently off the boat from Russia or Poland, but whenever a
Gentile newspaper got itself into financial difficulties, we were ready instantly
to pool our resources and buy it out, so that henceforth it could be in the
hands of one of our people.
In the 1920s, when radio was becoming a powerful
medium of persuasion, we began buying broadcasting stations and putting
together networks. At the same time we saw the potential for motion pictures
and began moving into Hollywood. By working together with each other we were
able to bankrupt or buy out every Gentile film producer except Walt Disney. We
had to wait until he died to take control of his film company, but by then we
already dominated the entire motion picture industry.
After the Second World War, when television became the
most powerful medium of mass persuasion, we were ready to move in and dominate
the TV industry from the beginning. Today no motion picture can be made and no
television program can be broadcast in America without our approval. Only a few
independent commercial radio stations, a few shortwave radio stations, and a
handful of book and magazine publishers remain free of our control. But the
American masses, for the most part, never see or hear anything we have not
approved. They do not understand shortwave, and they are afraid to read any
publication we have not approved, for fear that it might be "hate" material.
There is, of course, that pesky Internet, which is not
yet under our control, but we are moving rapidly to deal with that matter. We
expect soon to have our puppet politicians enact "hate speech"
legislation in America, similar to that which we already have succeeded in
having enforced in Europe, so that no one can say anything on the Internet that
has not been approved by us. The couch potatoes will not object, because we
will tell them that the new laws will make them safe from terrorism. By that
time we also should have achieved our goal for the disarmament of the American
population. And then, my fellow Elders of Zion, we can do to the American
people what we did to the Russian people. With our power of television, we will
have them voting for their own slaughter.
Long live our mass
media! Long live democracy! Long live the power of triumphant Zion!
No comments:
Post a Comment