In our weekly discussions here I sometimes use
careless language that leads to misunderstanding, and when I do I'm sorry for
it. The problem is that I really have a great deal of work to do, and I usually
don't have time to refine and polish my remarks before I go on the air, and so
sometimes I don't make myself as clear as I might. One listener criticized last
week's broadcast because I referred to Ayn Rand as a "Soviet Jewess"
who preached a religion of selfishness. He wrote to me that that was like
saying that Ayn Rand was a believer in both communism and individualism at the
same time, and that didn't make sense.
Actually,
my reference to Ayn Rand as a "Soviet Jewess" was intended to mean
only that she was a Jewess from the Soviet Union, not that she was an apostle
of communism. Unlike many of her fellow Jews at the time, she did not preach
communism. She was, however, an apostle not only of selfishness but also of
other destructive ideas preached by nearly all of her fellow Jews, such as the
idea that race doesn't matter. In her book The Virtue of Selfishness, after
railing vehemently and at length against what she called
"collectivism," she wrote:
"Racism
is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism."
Furthermore,
Ayn Rand's brand of selfishness was a far cry from the sort of self-reliance
and individual responsibility in which I believe. The atomistic sort of
selfishness she preached was intended - again I say intended - to
sever a person from his racial roots, to kill his feeling for his race, to lead
him to put his personal interests above his responsibilities to his race as a
whole, and, in fact, to abjure his racial responsibilities altogether. And this
was deliberate.
I don't
like to sound spooky or irrational about this, but I should tell you that many
years of experience have led me to believe that a maxim we all ought to be
guided by is, "No good thing cometh out of Israel." When a Jew
preaches anything to us - whether collectivism, as in the case of Karl Marx, or
extreme individualism, as in the case of Ayn Rand - it is intended to do us harm,
to deceive us, to weaken us, to make us more vulnerable. Even when it appears
to be anticommunism, it is slyly twisted so as to equate communism with every form
of collective feeling, and from there to make any form of racial feeling akin
to communism. And as I said, this is done very slyly, very cleverly, so that it
fools many people, especially the simpletons of the Right. Many anti-communists
today have let themselves be persuaded by Rand and her cohorts that racism is a
form of communism. A thousand generations of practice in the marketplace have given
Rand and her fellow tribesmen a rare talent for deception, for misdirection.
Let me
mention a specific example of this. According to all accounts the defining
event for the Jews of the world today is the so-called "Holocaust."
More professional Jews - that is, Jews whose profession is their Jewishness -
make their living today from the "Holocaust" than from anything else
connected with their Jewishness. It was, they tell us, the most horrible crime
in the history of the world. And they have trained a lot of Christian preachers
and Gentile politicians and Gentile media hacks to say the same thing. And they
have been sending to all of us the bill for this alleged "most horrible
crime in history" for quite a while now. First it was the Nazis, those
terrible people in Germany who, for some inexplicable reason, didn't like Jews
and so beginning in 1933 tried to get them all out of Germany by prohibiting
them from owning newspapers or radio stations, or from practicing law and so
on, and then after the start of the Second World War began putting them in
concentration camps. So, after the Second World War the Nazis were hounded and
hunted down and murdered wholesale. The Jews still gloat over that and complain
among themselves that they didn't get to kill as many as they wanted to.
Now, if
you're confused because that image of the bloodthirsty, gloating Jew doesn't
quite match the image presented by Hollywood of the lovable, benevolent, funny,
clever, and helpful Jew - the wise, thoughtful, humanitarian Jew presented to
you every day on your television screen - let me read you part of an article
that appeared in a New York Jewish newspaper just three weeks ago. The article
is in the November 26 edition of the Jewish Press, and it was written by
New York Jewish Assemblyman Dov Hikind. It's about a Jewish organization with
the Hebrew name Nakam, an organization that certainly would be called a
"hate group" - if it weren't Jewish, of course.
Assemblyman
Hikind writes:
"Recently
two elderly Holocaust survivors proudly related their involvement in Nakam, a
brigade of survivors who attempted to avenge the murders of their families. In
a documentary made for Nuremberg TV, Liepke Distel and Joseph Harmatz, both
nearing eighty, confirmed that they had conspired to kill Nazis by poisoning
their bread with arsenic. Regrettably, the arsenic wasn't potent enough, and
the German POWs became ill but did not die. It's a shame that the tens of thousands
of Nazis who avoided capture and punishment did not suffer at the hands of
their former victims."
Assemblyman
Hikind then goes on to rage that some Germans have had the nerve to suggest
that the two Jewish poisoners should be put on trial for war crimes.
Oi, veh!
The very idea of punishing Jews for crimes against Germans gives Hikind a fit.
It's fine for Jews to track down 80-year-old Germans alleged to have killed
Jews during the war and send them off for a show trial somewhere. There's good
money in that for the Jews, although Hikind doesn't put it quite that way. What
he says about the Germans is this:
"There
should not be a moment of peace for those who committed those horrible crimes.
They should never feel secure, should never enjoy the tranquility of a family
life they tore from so many."
But as for
the Jews who murdered Germans after the war, why, of course, they should not be
punished. They were just nice Jewish boys doing what comes naturally for Jews,
and regrettably they didn't use enough arsenic.
Anyway,
the contrast between the bloodthirsty hatefulness displayed by Hikind talking
to his fellow Jews in the Jewish Press and the image of the Jews
presented to us by Hollywood is instructive, I believe. It's also instructive
to contrast Hikind's account of this arsenic episode in the November 26 Jewish
Press with what really happened. In 1945 and 1946, in the months after the
Germans surrendered and the democratic and communist occupation forces moved
in, the Jews were running wild in Germany. Under the protection of the
occupation armies, bands of Jews murdered thousands of disarmed Germans. Going
from door to door at night, they took Germans out and shot them or cut their throats.
But that
wasn't enough for the Jews. They wanted to kill Germans in much larger numbers,
and so they decided to poison the water supplies for several major German
cities. By the time the Jews had gotten the poison together, however, the
cities of Germany were swarming with hundreds of thousands of Jews released
from the concentration camps, who had miraculously managed to avoid the gas
chambers, and the poisoners were afraid that some of these Jews might be killed
if they poisoned the water supplies.
They
decided to poison German prisoners of war instead. On the night of April 13,
1946, two Jews broke into a bakery in Nuremberg which supplied bread to a large
German POW camp. They poisoned 3,000 loaves of bread with arsenic. Several
hundred German prisoners who ate the poisoned bread the next day died a painful
death, and several thousand were hospitalized. But New York Assemblyman Dov
Hikind rages that not enough arsenic was used. If they had used more arsenic,
then they could have killed thousands instead of hundreds, and he finds it "regrettable"
that that didn't happen.
Now, 54
years later, the supply of German POWs has pretty well dried up, so the Jews
have announced that it's all of the German people, including those born after
the war, that must be held responsible for mistreating the Jews. They must pay
and pay and pay, because they committed the "most horrible crime in
history." And in fact, we all must pay. It was the Germans who did it, but
we let them do it, so we must pay too. We must continue to support the bandit state
of Israel, financially, militarily, and diplomatically. We must wage war
against Israel's neighbors when they fail to obey a United Nations directive or
when we suspect they're trying to develop weapons of mass destruction. But
Israel can ignore all the UN directives it wants, continue to develop new
Jewish settlements in territory stolen from its neighbors, continue to torture
Palestinian prisoners and dynamite the homes of their families, and continue to
build up its illegal stocks of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, and
we must look the other way. That's because we owe the Jews a free ride, right?
It's because we didn't stop the Germans from mistreating those nice, Jewish
boys soon enough. We let what they call the "most horrible crime in
history" happen, and so we must pay.
I always
have been amazed at how well this swindle works. Of course, it's easier to
swindle a nation when you control what that nation sees on its television
screens. But still, I am surprised at the gullibility of my own people, at how
easily they are deceived. I am surprised even though the swindlers, as I said a
moment ago, have a rare talent for deception. I mean, just look at the facts.
The Jews call what the Germans did to them the "most horrible crime in
history." Consider what the Jews did to the Russians, to the Ukrainians,
to the Poles, and to the Balts, not to mention what they did to the Germans. A
conservative estimate of the number of Russians and Ukrainians killed by Jewish
communism between the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 and the end of the Second
World War is 30 million.
Now, even
if one accepts the canonical figure of six million Jews killed in the so-called
"Holocaust," that alleged "most horrible crime in history"
is dwarfed by the slaughter of Slavs and Balts by the Jews. In the Baltic
countries before the war, the Communist Party was a kosher enterprise,
consisting almost exclusively of Jews. When the Red Army occupied Latvia, Lithuania,
and Estonia in 1940 and installed communist governments, Jewish commissars
began arresting and murdering what they called "the class enemy," but
which really was the Gentile enemy. Teachers, professors, writers, policemen,
military officers, businessmen, doctors - even lawyers - were rounded up by the
secret police and then murdered, sometimes after horrible tortures. The Jews
wanted no one left alive who might be looked upon as a leader by the masses.
They
murdered more than 60,000 members of the leadership elite in tiny Estonia alone,
which had a total population of only 1.2 million. They decapitated the Baltic
countries.
They did
the same thing in Poland, only they didn't have a chance to do it on such a
huge scale, because the Germans seized the larger part of Poland, including most
of the cities, before the Reds did. But in the part of Poland occupied by the
Red Army the Jewish commissars rounded up 15,000 Polish leaders, mostly
military officers, and murdered them. The Germans later discovered the corpses
of more than 4,000 of them in mass graves in a forest near the Russian village
of Katyn. The rest have never been found.
The Jews
complain loudly today that when the Germans liberated the Baltic countries in
1941, the local Balts were much more eager to kill Jews than the Germans were.
The Germans had to hold the Balts back for the sake of order. And in Poland at
the end of the war, after the Germans had left and before the Reds had clamped
down, there were several mass lynchings of Jews by the Poles. In the Polish
town of Kielce in 1946, for example, the local Poles killed 43 Jews before the
communists could stop them. The Jews claim to have no clue as to why the Balts
and the Poles hated them so much. They pretend that it's a mystery to them. Why
should those nasty Slavs and Balts want to hurt the poor, inoffensive,
long-suffering, humanitarian Jews, who have done so much for mankind? And even
today American school children are much more likely to hear about the 43 Jews
killed in Kielce by the Poles in 1946 than they are about the 15,000 Polish
leaders killed by the Jews in the Katyn forest and elsewhere in 1940. And they
are quite unlikely to hear about the deliberate poisoning of German POWs after
the war by Jews, just as they are unlikely to hear any genuine expression of
sentiment by leading Jews, such as New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind's expression
of regret that the Jewish poisoners didn't use more arsenic.
You know,
the history of the Second World War is a big and complex subject. So is the
so-called "Holocaust." There are many aspects of both of these
subjects which still ought to be investigated to determine where the truth is.
But most of the misunderstanding that exists today is not due to the complexity
of the subjects. It is due to deliberate deception. The mass murder of the
elites of the Baltic countries is not something that is too complex for the
average American to understand. It is simply something that the people who
control the mass media in America prefer that the average citizen not know.
What they want the average citizen to think about is how the poor, blameless
Jews suffered, through no fault of their own, and how we didn't do anything to stop
their suffering, so we owe them a free ride today.
One can
read specialized history books to learn about the genocide committed against
the Balts and the Poles and the Ukrainians by the Jews. One can even read a
little about this genocide in the Encyclopedia Britannica. But no school
teacher in America will mention it, for fear of losing his or her job. In
America's public schools, just as on television, genocide means only one thing:
the killing of the poor, blameless Jews by the wicked anti-Semites of the
world, especially the Nazis. And since Americans don't read specialized history
books - and very few of them ever pick up an encyclopedia - what Steven
Spielberg says about genocide in his movies is what most Americans believe it
is. That's deliberate deception.
And this
deception has serious consequences. I am sure that many Americans believe that
what happened in a war that ended 55 years ago is no longer relevant and
certainly not worth arguing about. But even if I and every other Gentile agreed
not to belabor the issue any more, the Jews wouldn't agree. They're making too
much money from it. And that's not just the billions they're shaking down the
Swiss and the Germans and the French and everybody else for. The extortion money
is the least of it. Much more important is the psychic aspect: the feeling on
the part of a brainwashed public that it's reprehensible to criticize Jews for
anything, because they have suffered so much more than anyone else - and
through no fault of their own, poor dears. That's why people are afraid to say
anything about Jewish media control in America, afraid even to acknowledge its
reality. And Jewish media control is destroying America, destroying our civilization,
destroying our race. Virtually every destructive policy coming from Washington -
immigration policy, affirmative action, forced school integration, the
promotion of feminism and homosexuality, the ramming of multiculturalism down
our throats, you name it - is a consequence of Jewish control of the mass
media. So it is important to get over this feeling that the Jews shouldn't be
criticized or held accountable. And to get over it we need to understand what
really happened during and after the war and why it happened.
I have one
more comment on this subject. I am often criticized - sometimes even denounced
in extreme terms - because of what some listeners believe is bloodymindedness
on my part. Some people thought that it was just terrible that I spoke last
week about putting politicians' heads on poles outside the community latrine.
What an uncivilized thing to say! Some people suggested that this shows that I
am not really sane, that I am filled with barely repressed homicidal impulses.
Well, I
have spent more time than my critics, I believe, acquainting myself with what
goes on in the real world. I have spent much time studying the details of what
the Jews did to the Estonians and to the Ukrainians and to the Poles - and also
to the Germans. These are terrible and uncivilized things, but they are real.
Just because Steven Spielberg never will make a movie about them makes them no
less real and no less terrible. And it is my knowledge of the reality of these
terrible things - my conviction that this is what the world is really like -
and that the terrible things that happened before to our people will happen
again if we let them happen. And we won't stop them from happening by sipping
tea and engaging in polite conversation with the people who are responsible for
these things happening.
We must
deal with the real world, and the real world has been a bloody and terrible
place in the past, and I firmly believe that it will continue to be that way.
Survival is a bloody business. Let us not be fooled by our momentary comforts
into believing otherwise. The mess we are in presently is more likely to be
resolved by somebody's heads being put on poles than it is by being polite and
avoiding the more unpleasant aspects of reality.
I am not
really obsessed by the desire to cut off the heads of any group of people - not
even the heads of the politicians. But I am obsessed by the idea that we must
not, through inaction or through an insistence on being polite and civilized,
allow the enemies of our people to do again to us what they did in Estonia or
in Ukraine or in the Katyn forest or in the prisoner of war camp at Nürnberg.
And as long as they continue in their efforts to deceive us, as long as they
continue in their efforts to prevent people like me from contradicting them, I
will continue to be obsessed.
No comments:
Post a Comment