By Mike Walsh
It is commonly believed that genocide means the
pre-planned systematic physical destruction, usually by violence, of a distinct
ethnic, religious or racial group. As one might expect of a mind-conditioned
population it is natural to single out the unsubstantiated holocaust as an
example.
Lip service is paid to the
European genocide of Native Americans, Incas and Aztecs, Maori and Australian
peoples. It is doubtful however if all combine to merit one-minute if set
against a year of holocaust propaganda.
Even those who should know
better feel that we gild the lily by describing what is currently happening to
ethnic Europeans as genocide. However, if genocide is defined by legal
convention it is not necessary to be a Philadelphia lawyer to make a case of
genocide against thousands employed directly or indirectly by Western regimes.
The Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, solemnly signed by
representatives of Western regimes, clearly sets out what is meant by genocide.
A quick perusal leads one to the conclusion that Europe and America’s political
elite, judicial and law enforcement agencies, educational and media apparatus,
are liable for prosecution for genocide relating to ethnic Europeans.
Is such a notion fanciful? You
decide if such are in clear defiance of the Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of the crime of Genocide. Under the terms of the Convention any of
the following definitions constitute genocide; i.e. intent to destroy, in whole
or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such:
· Killing members of a defined
ethnic group. (State sponsored race-confrontations and violence)
· Causing serious bodily or
mental harm to a group (dissent is punishable by law).
· Deliberately inflicting
conditions of life calculated to bring about a group’s physical destruction in
whole or part. (race-mixing).
· Imposing measures to limit
reproduction by natural birth.
· Forcibly transferring children
from one ethnic group to another.
Under these definitions any
person who promotes an environment hostile to that of ethnic-Europeans is
guilty of genocide. These might be legally defined as:
· Promotion of a multi-cultural
environment by which it might reasonably be assumed inter-racial strife will
result in injury and loss of life; (i.e. uncontrolled immigration).
· The initiation and
institutionalised promotion of an educational and cultural environment
specifically designed to degrade an ethnic group; (promotion of anti-White
propaganda).
· Affirmative action by which
alien ethnic groups are given advantages to the disadvantage of the host ethnic
group. (a pro-coloured agenda)
· Institutionalised
interbreeding propaganda aimed at the dissolution of one or more ethnic groups;
(promotion of race-mixing pogroms).
· State sponsored birth control
and institutionalised patronage of an environment hostile to the natural cause
of ethnic reproduction, i.e. Promotion of homosexuality, single relationship,
multi-partnerships etc.
· The institutionalised
stigmatisation of ethnic groups simultaneous to the artificial promotion of the
artificial values of an alien ethnic group.
· To undervalue cultural norms
(cultural genocide) by exchanging ethnic roles; i.e. theatre, ballet, TV and
movie roles traditionally filled by Europeans with non-Europeans.
· The institutionalised and
endorsement of birth control by subsidised distribution of contraceptives,
abortion, family control, economic restraints the purpose of which reduces
family numbers.
· Cross-race and same gender
adoption of infants.
· A government sponsored program
of mass deception and mind programming.
We can be certain that the foregoing
can be considerably adapted and enhanced. It is enough to say that under the
terms of Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
charges may be placed against all who may be responsible in whole or in part
for the foregoing.
Those brought to account will
include political legislators, media editors and selected individuals or groups
engaged by various government-funded public relations bodies. All engaged in
the education, judicial (police, courts and prison services, private or
otherwise), civil service, non-government organisations (NGO), law enforcement
agencies and institutions. Race, religion and ethnicity of those charged will
not be a factor in the process of prosecution. This list is not exclusive.
If you are employed directly or
indirectly in any of the above careers, or any calling in which your purpose is
likely to contravene the aforementioned liabilities, you can be certain that in
the fullness of time it will be you who will be waiting for the ominous rapping
on the door.
No Copyright.
Republishing or Sharing Invited.
No comments:
Post a Comment