Today marks
the launch of Britain’s first ‘Migration Museum‘, intended to reflect the ‘migratory history’
of the peoples of the United Kingdom. The enterprise, modelled on similar
projects on Ellis Island, in Paris and in Germany, is long overdue if you read
the opinion columns of the left-wing press. It is currently being housed across
the River Thames opposite parliament, until a permanent home for its
exhibitions can be built or found.
The project has been introduced by a
former Labour Party Immigration Minister by the name of Barbara Roche, a Jewish
woman who penned an article in today’s edition of the left-wing Guardian
newspaper entitled “Why are the British so reluctant to
recognise our migrant history?”. The article contains the usual drivel, of course, drawing on the
so-called “immigration waves” of the first millennia to somehow justify mass
migration in a contemporary context – this is an unfortunate comparison,
considering the myth of Britain being a ‘mongrel nation’ has been dispelled by
almost every leading geneticist and archaeologist in Europe.
But, not content with more lies to
convince the British people to accept more migration, Roche goes further
claiming that Britain’s vote to leave the European Union is in some way a reason
why we need such a museum. She claims that central to the
contemporary debate about identity should be the role of migration throughout
our history.
Ms Roche obviously forgets that more
people came to Britain in 2004 than throughout the entire period 1066-1945. But
of course, she would forget such things, considering she was minister for
immigration in Tony Blair’s Labour government that presided over organised mass
migration in order to, in the words of government ministers themselves, “make
the United Kingdom truly multicultural”. She laments the fact that migration is
a contentious issue, yet fails to take responsibility for her government making
it so.
But more startling than Roche’s
sycophantic ramblings and rank hypocrisy is the overwhelming Jewish presence in
this latest celebration of mass immigration. Barbara Roche is not just the
primary advocate of the migration museum, but also the chair of the board of
trustees. In her article, she proudly proclaims her Jewish roots in the second
sentence, as if this somehow entitles her to lecture an entire race of people
on the “virtues” of mass immigration.
As we delve further into the
structure of the migrant museum, we find that Judaism is not simply at the head
of this organisation, but at its roots and running through its very veins.
Amongst the primary financial
backers of this venture, we first find the Rothschild foundation. Of course,
this needs little explanation. It is a well known fact that the Rothschild
family have funded numerous subversive movements in practically all European
nations, along with their dangerous exploits in the banking sector. That they
would get involved so explicitly in such a venture is testament to their
arrogance and sense of complacency.
Next on the list there is the Kohn Foundation, who have by all accounts invested
large sums of money into the migrant museum project. The Kohn foundation is the
brainchild of one Ralph Kohn, a Jewish scientist who received a knighthood from
the British government for services to medicine and research. According to the British government website
for registered charities, the Kohn Foundations aims “to advance or promote education
(of) the Jewish religion.” Kohn was born in Leipzig, as one of 4
children to an Orthodox Jewish family. They fled to Amsterdam upon the rise of
Hitler and the NSDAP, then remarkably, were on the last boat of refugees from
Holland to England in 1940 (making him a holocaust survivor, perhaps?)
Another source of funding and
support for the migrant museum project is the Rayne Foundation, a “well-funded
and influential charitable organisation”. The foundation is a product of a man
named Max Rayne, a property developer and
philanthropist from a Jewish family in the East-End of London. Rayne was said
to be “on the governing bodies of most prominent Jewish charities” thanks to
his “highly valued business skills”. Rayne’s grandfather was a Hebrew scholar.
The Alfred Caplin Charity Settlement
can also be counted as one of the backers for the migrant museum. There is
little to be found regarding the founding of this particular charity, except
that, according to the government website; the charity “makes grants for
general charitable purposes with an emphasis on charities linked to the Jewish
community.”
Finally, there is the Paul Hamlyn
Foundation. Paul Hamlyn, the founder of the Paul Hamlyn
Foundation, was yet another escapee from “Nazi horror” when his family
emigrated to England in 1933. Hamlyn, originally from Berlin, established
himself as a publisher and, of course, a philanthropist. At this point it
almost does not require explanation, but Hamlyn comes from a Jewish family, his
surname at birth being “Hamburger”.
What we can see in this latest
left-wing indoctrination project is an overtly visible Jewish presence from the
top to the bottom. Why do the principle financiers of a mass migration advocacy
project come from the Jewish community? Why are Jews so over represented in the
open borders movement? Why do Jewish “philanthropists” feel duty-bound to
advance the causes of minority groups across Western Europe?
One can only speculate, but this is
a pattern that can be seen throughout the history of left-wing movements,
including Communism where, in Russia, 75% of the original core clique of the
Bolshevik Party were Jews. Karl Marx himself, the founder of communism, was
Jewish. George Soros, profiteer and financier of the subversion of nation
states from London to Budapest, is Jewish. These financiers of this latest
migration advocacy project; Jewish.
Are these mere coincidences?
I invite you to draw your own
conclusions…
No comments:
Post a Comment