By Dr. William L. Pierce
I’ve spoken before about the deliberately
destructive role of the mass media in American society. I’ve talked about the
psychology of liberalism, about what makes liberals do the crazy and destructive
things they do. Today, though, instead of talking about the enemies of our
society, the enemies of our people, let’s just talk about our people and the
sort of society that we need.
You know, a
society is a very complex thing: it is like a living organism. It responds to
selective environmental forces, and it evolves. In past ages it was the
struggle of our people to survive, the competition of our people against other
peoples, other races, which determined the nature of our society. Societies which
functioned well survived. Societies which didn’t function well perished.
Historically, if some crazy liberal came along and were able to change all of
the rules and structures in a society to suit some egalitarian fantasy of his,
the society would sink like a rock, and its people would perish. And that’s
what’s happening to our society today, although it may not be apparent to us
because of the time scale. After the experimenters finish their deadly work, it
may take a society 200 years to disintegrate completely and sink out of sight.
That’s not long from a historical viewpoint, but it’s long enough so that most
of the people involved never realize what’s happening to them.
The society
we had in Europe up until the end of the 18th century — or one may say, the
various national societies there, which really were very much alike when
compared with any non-European society — this European society had evolved over
a period of many, many generations of our people, and it had fine-tuned itself
to our special nature; it had developed its institutions and its ways of doing
things which suited us as a people and allowed us to form viable, efficient
communities. And when we colonized North America and other parts of the world,
we brought the essential elements of our society with us.
The first
essential element was order. Everyone had a place in our society, whether he
was the village blacksmith or the king, and he knew what that place was. He
knew how he fitted in, what his responsibilities were, to whom he owed loyalty
and respect, and to whom he in turn was obliged to provide guidance. It was a
hierarchical society. There was no pretense that everyone was just as capable
or just as creative or just as brave or just as suited for leadership as anyone
else. People had social rank and social status and social authority
commensurate with their social responsibilities and with their contributions to
society.
The second
essential feature that our society had was homogeneity. Everyone had the same
roots, the same history, the same genes, the same sensibilities. Or at least,
there was enough genetic similarity, there was a close enough family
relationship among the people, so that people understood each other. A village,
a province, a nation was like a large, extended family. People felt a sense of
kinship, a sense of belonging, a sense of loyalty and responsibility that
extended to the whole society. This feeling of belonging, this sense of a
common history and a common destiny, this sense of identity, was the glue that
held the society together and gave it its strength. And it gave men and women
their individual strength too. Just knowing who they were, where they had been,
and where they were going made an enormous difference in their sense of
personal security, in their ability to plan ahead and be reasonably confident
of what the future held for them.
This
homogeneity and the consequent sense of family, of identity, was thousands of
years in developing, just like the hierarchical order in our society. And we
developed, we evolved, along with our society. The type of society we had
become imprinted on our genes. Of course, it wasn’t a perfect society. It was
full of problems and imperfections. We always were developing new technologies,
for example, and our society didn’t always have time to adjust itself to these
innovations before even more innovations came along. But it was a society in
which we were strong and confident and more or less spiritually healthy.
You know,
the opponents of social order and racial homogeneity will try to confuse the
issue by pointing out that we have a longer life span today, that our infant
mortality rate is much lower, that we don’t have to work as hard to support
ourselves, that we can buy all sorts of shiny gadgets that our ancestors
couldn’t, and so on. They want you to believe that these changes came about as
benefits of the breakdown of order and the destruction of homogeneity. But they
didn’t. They are all the results of technological innovation. Our medical
scientists learned how to control the diseases which shortened our lives. Our
scientists and engineers learned how we could work more efficiently. And they
learned how to make new tools and new toys for us.
Now, to be
sure, not all of the degenerative changes in our society which have occurred in
the past couple of centuries have been the consequence of the destructive
efforts of the Jews and the liberals. The Industrial Revolution really was a
huge shock to our traditional form of society. The Industrial Revolution took
people off the farms and out of the villages and packed them into factory towns
like sardines in a can. This was a great strain on the old order. The new
relationship between factory owner and factory workers was not as healthy a one
as had existed between landowner and workers on the land, nor was the new,
urban life-style as spiritually healthy as the village life-style.
Unrest and
revolution were fomented from the latter part of the 18th century and
throughout the 19th and 20th centuries: egalitarianism, Communism, democracy,
equal rights, no responsibilities, welfare programs, feminism. The old order
was drowned in blood. In France the aristocrats and the landowners were
butchered in response to the resentments which the liberals had stirred up
among the rabble. Later in Russia the same process took place, when the Jewish
Bolsheviks finally gained the upper hand and butchered not just the
aristocrats, but everyone who had worked a little harder and been a little more
successful than the rabble. The kulaks, the small farmers and
landowners, were murdered en masse, by the millions, in order to
“equalize” Russian society and destroy the last traces of the old, hierarchical
order.
And into the
social chaos of the 20th century the enemies of our people were able to
introduce their idea of racial equality alongside their idea of social
equality. We were told that the descendants of our slaves are just as good as
we are — maybe better — and so they should become our social equals. We should
bring them into our schools and neighborhoods, and we should intermarry with
them, and we should buy Food Stamps for them with our taxes, and we should give
them preference in hiring and promotions. And we should open our borders to all
of the non-White wretched refuse of the Third World’s teeming shores. They also
are our equals, we are told. The more diversity the better. Diversity is our
strength. Et cetera. Et cetera. Blah, blah, blah.
We were too
disoriented and confused by the destruction of our social order to resist this
poisonous propaganda. And so here we are at the end of the 20th century. There
are some people who will try to convince you that things never have been
better. We certainly have more equality and less order, more diversity and less
homogeneity than ever before. And that obviously suits some people, in addition
to the liberals and the Jews who have been pushing for these changes.
Are these
changes better for us?
The suicide
statistics, the drug statistics, the crime statistics, the divorce statistics,
and the mental illness statistics give us part of the answer. The statistics
should help us keep our grip on reality when the Jewish media try to persuade
us that we need more of the same poison they have been dishing out for so long:
more equality, more chaos, more diversity.
And we
should be able to look into our own souls for the rest of the answer. We should
know that we need again to have an ordered, structured society, in which we all
have a place and will be appreciated according to how effectively we fill that
place. We should know that we need again to have a homogeneous society, in
which we can feel a sense of belonging. We should know that we need a society
in which we have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and
uncertainty. We should know that we need a society in which everyone strives
for quality, not for an imaginary equality. We should know that in order to be
spiritually healthy again we need a society in which we can feel a sense of rootedness
and responsibility, rather than the aimless, wandering, rootless, cosmopolitan,
egoism which characterizes American society today.
If we are
honest with ourselves we know that we all crave a healthy society again, we
need it. But too many of us have let ourselves be persuaded by the enemies of
our people that the type of society we need is no longer attainable. Our
enemies tell us, “We have destroyed the order in your society. We have made
everyone equal, and you dare not try to take that equality away. That would be
like trying to take candy away from a child. We have opened the candy store and
told all the children that they can have as much as they want, and it’s all
free. They all will fight you if you try to change that, if you try to tell them
that they must earn their candy.” And our enemies grin in triumph when they see
how that demoralizes and discourages so many of us.
And they
tell us, “We have destroyed the homogeneity in your society. We have replaced
your homogeneity with diversity. We have brought every non-White type on the
face of the earth into your midst, we have brought them in by the millions, and
we have forced you to mix with them. Now there’s nothing you can do to restore
your homogeneity.” And again they grin and say, “What will you do? Will you try
to root out every non-White and every mongrel and send them all away or get rid
of them? You don’t have the stomach for that. So you’d better just learn to
live with all of these non-Whites and mongrels. Pretty soon you’ll be a minority
in your own land.” And they gloat.
And it is
true, of course, that many of us do not yet have the stomach to do what must be
done. And so the suicide rate and the divorce rate and the abortion rate will
keep rising. The government will continue building more prisons. The cults will
continue thriving. And the Jews and the liberals will keep telling us how
wonderful everything is, how things have never been better, how we should
appreciate all of the equality and diversity.
But, you
know, all the while the number of us who do have the stomach to do what must be
done will be growing. Our numbers are growing, because more and more of our
people are coming to understand that the only alternative is death: death for
our society, death for our children, death for our kind. What the Jews and
liberals have done to our society is lethal. It cannot be sustained.
Order and
homogeneity, a sense of identity and belonging, are not just luxuries for us.
They are essential. Without them our society sickens and dies. The liberals may
not be able to understands that, and the Jews, with their media propaganda, try
to keep the rest of us from understanding it, but we can see the proof of it
all around us. And we are determined to do whatever we must do to have once
again a society for our own kind, a society to which we can really belong and
feel a sense of responsibility to, a society in which we have a place and are
appreciated if we fill that place well, a society based on order and quality
and structure and commonality. We will have it. We will do what is necessary.
***
From Free Speech,
May 1997, Volume III, Number 5
No comments:
Post a Comment